Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-08 Thread Terje Kvernes
Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  [ ... ]

> 1. not but-ugly, like TWM, VTWM, CTWM, and FVWM
>I care more about functionality, but these are simply
>depressing to look at.

  http://terje.kvernes.no/tmp/snapshot2.png >.  is this
  butt-ugly?

  [ ... ]

> Sawfish is pretty nice, but I'm so sick of LISP-configurable SW I
> think I'm going to puke.  Trying to get Sawfish to do anything it
> is fully capable of doing is a major endeavor for me, because I
> just don't seem to be able to think the way LISP programmers do.

  you have my sympathy.  for me, the almost-lisp part of Sawfish is
  the only redeeming feature of Sawfish.

  [ ... ]

> 1. move a window to a pre-specified position on the screen

  check.

> 2. enlarge a window by X pixels in width or height

  check.
 
> 3. make a window a specified width by height, or one or the
> other

  check.

> 4. move a window to another desktop (but stay in the one you're
> in).
  
  check.

> 5. cycle between windows (not with a menu or pop-up window)

  check.

> 6. don't cycle between some of the windows (e.g., gkrellm).

  check.

> 7. for some X applications, put them on a pre-specified desktop
> when they start (i.e., xterms on 1, ide on 2, browsers on 4,
> etc.).

  check.

> 8. de-iconify a window (usually this involves popping up a menu
> and selecting which one you want (using the keyboard -- and not
> the damn arrow keys -- sawfish could do this - or some LISP I
> wrote, I can't remember).

  not sure about this one, I don't use icons and rarely ever minimize
  windows -- I just have 16-odd virtual desktops instead.
 
> Does anyone know of a window manager that can come close?  Does
> anyone know of one that they are just impressed with the keyboard
> shortcut configurability?

  due to space issues at home, I can't really use a mouse with my
  current fvwm setup.  I never miss it though, as I do everything I
  need to do with the keyboard.
 
> And for this last one, I'm not talking about some small set of
> events that the author identified as worthy of keyboard
> accessibility (a la WindowMaker, Enlightenment, Blackbox,  all of them>).  I'm talking about something like twm had, where
> _everything_ can be done with the keyboard.

  yup.  with fvwm I can also send mouse-events (clicks and move the
  mouse) with the keyboard, if the application really needs to talk to
  a mouse for some reason.

-- 
Terje

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-08 Thread brett holcomb
I like xfce.  Try xfce4 at www.xfce4.org.

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:55:07 -0500
 Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,

I'm hoping someone can help me choose a Window Manager I 


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-07 Thread Sebastian Hungerecker
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:55:07 -0500
Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. not but-ugly, like TWM, VTWM, CTWM, and FVWM
>I care more about functionality, but these are simply
>depressing to look at.
FVWM isn't ugly (at least it hasn't to be), perhaps you just configured
it wrong. Here's a taste of how highly customizable the FVWM-look is:
http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-loki.jpg
With x11-themes/fvwm-themes installed it's even more customizable

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-07 Thread Richard Kilgore
Wow, great feedback!  Thanks!

- richard

-- 
Richard Kilgore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-07 Thread Susie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:55:07 -0500
Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey all,
> 
> I'm hoping someone can help me choose a Window Manager I don't
> hate.  I've been through TWM, VTWM, FVWM, CTWM, Enlightenment,
> WindowMaker, Sawfish, and recently Waimea.  I have some difficult
> requirements that I have been unable to meet to my satisfaction.
> 
> The two most important are:
> 
> 1. not but-ugly, like TWM, VTWM, CTWM, and FVWM
>I care more about functionality, but these are simply
>depressing to look at.
> 2. keyboard, keyboard, keyboard, keyboard.
>in my Utopia, _nothing_ should be possible with the
>mouse or (god forbid) a menu, that is not possible
>with a configurable shortcut key-binding

Ok try openbox, with bbpager, bbload, bbconf, bbappconf, and idesk. 
Idesk is what will give you desktop icons(and should of worked with
waimea actually).  It's masked but I unmasked it and had no problem.(my
guess is it's still in testing stage).  Also if you have a multimedia
keyboard unmask lineak and emerge that.  It works great and my keyboard
is all mapped out making use of net keys and multi media... (the
multimedia button launches mplayer on mine, the other keys tho control
xmms, and my net keys control various apps I use tho could of controlled
a browser)  While I don't have other special keymaps beyond that
happening bbconf does offer keymapping.  BBappconf will do some of the
other things you require of apps below as will bblaunch(which can open
things on specified desktops via .xinitrc and can also specify if
something is sticky to desktops).  Using the mouse in openbox you can
nav much as you did on waimea.  You also can use windowmaker dock
apps.(I have several going some of which launch programs again when
clicked... also I'm the maker of a few dockapp ebuilds that are now in
protage ).  Oh and with openbox you can hide the toolbar which is
what I do and I have the silt in the center instead.  Fluxbox is good
and I'd use it but it doesn't get arid of that toolbar tho it will hide
it.(it tabs/groups apps).  Waimea was cool but I found it's navigation
disorienting... I just wish openbox had the tabs of flux and the second
slit that waimea offers then it would be near perfect.(as well none of
them are totally perfect but it would be what I'd like hehehe)...
Anyways I hope this helps.  Openbox is small and fast and related to
waimea, fluxbox, and blackbox.  Another one that is simple and good is
hackedbox which I was trying to make a ebuild for but still have to
learn something about using "commonbox" eclass.

Next to openbox xfce4 rocks... only fault I have with it is I can't see
how to dock windowmaker dockapps.  If you use more than one windowmanger
and your trying to see what you like best try selectwm as it will lauch
x and let you graphically select from a list what you want to run.

> And finally, I like to do some things with windows (from the
> keyboard) that not all window manager authors seem to think is
> interesting, like:
> 
> 1. move a window to a pre-specified position on the screen
> 2. enlarge a window by X pixels in width or height
> 3. make a window a specified width by height, or one or the
>other
> 4. move a window to another desktop (but stay in the one
>you're in).
> 5. cycle between windows (not with a menu or pop-up window)
> 6. don't cycle between some of the windows (e.g., gkrellm).
> 7. for some X applications, put them on a pre-specified
> desktop when they start (i.e., xterms on 1, ide on 2,
> browsers on 4, etc.).
> 8. de-iconify a window (usually this involves popping up
> a menu and selecting which one you want (using the
> keyboard -- and not the damn arrow keys -- sawfish
> could do this - or some LISP I wrote, I can't remember).
> 
> Does anyone know of a window manager that can come close?  Does
> anyone know of one that they are just impressed with the keyboard
> shortcut configurability?
> 
> And for this last one, I'm not talking about some small set of
> events that the author identified as worthy of keyboard
> accessibility (a la WindowMaker, Enlightenment, Blackbox,  all of them>).  I'm talking about something like twm had, where
> _everything_ can be done with the keyboard.
> 
> - richard
> 


- -- 

Susie
http://arienadean.tripod.com/

Digitally signed
GPG Key ID: E93F0D23
Key fingerprint = 33F8 0E9D 3AD1 23E0 C70F  ECC6 7871 D811 E93F 0D23

- ---

"A likely impossibility is always preferable to an unconvincing
possibility." - Aristotle



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Ck+VeHHYEek/DSMRAqzsAKCLppXic0zaXs16V18nUKz4NNDEhACgmAH3
Oe5JcVIM4kHGsYkTY2/4a10=
=7TZ9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] window manager selection

2003-07-07 Thread MIKE MacMartin
> The two most important are:
>
> 1. not but-ugly, like TWM, VTWM, CTWM, and FVWM
>I care more about functionality, but these are simply
>depressing to look at.
> 2. keyboard, keyboard, keyboard, keyboard.
>in my Utopia, _nothing_ should be possible with the
>mouse or (god forbid) a menu, that is not possible
>with a configurable shortcut key-binding

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge xfce4

it's in a similar style to the CDE, but with the sleekness of GUI of gnome2.  
It's also nice, fast, spiffy... and to boot, you can do

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge xfwm4-themes

and get some nice looking window decorations.

I'm unsure about the keyboard navigation thing, but I'm assuming that it's 
possible.

>
> - richard
MIKE
-- 
Beware the JabberOrk

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list