Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Daniel da Veiga wrote: > On 2/6/07, Ric de France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 07/02/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > > > > That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I > > > > decided to this time, so like you said, my /boot was not > > > > mounted > > > > so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat > > > > was a stupid mistake on my part. > > > > > > > > Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you > > > > all with this... > > > > > > > > Gabriel > > > > > > I think we've all made that mistake at some point! > > > > > > No need to apologize, it's something to learn from. At least now > > > when the next newbie makes the same mistake you are in a position > > > to help them in return :-) > > > > Just curious... but does genkernel automatically mount /boot? I use > > genkernel, and have never had any issues, but I'm pretty sure that > > I've always mounted /boot before running the genkernel command. > > Yes, genkernel mounts /boot right after launched... genkernel *conditionally* mounts /boot if /etc/genkernel.conf contains MOUNTBOOT="yes" It can be unset with the result that /boot will not be mounted automatically alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo VMWare image works on Intel but not AMD. Are they not interchangeable?
Daevid, If your Gentoo installation was compiled with march=p4 or the like, your image will not work on an AMD machine. The way to have them interchangeable is to use march=i686 mtune=p4, that way there are no cpu-specific instructions compiled into your binaries. mtune will just adjust the scheduling to fit the pipeline of your most used arch. The one piece of hardware that cannot be virtualized on an x86 machine is unfortunately the cpu, unless of course you're running a new cpu with Intel Virtualization or AMD's Pacifica. Even then, it can't deal with incompatible binaries. You'll not just have to recompile your kernel, but your entire system with the new cflags for it to work interchangeably. Jason Weisberger On 2/5/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a VMWare Workstation image of Gentoo Linux that I transfer between my desktop and my notebook (for LAMP/Ruby development) and it works fantastic on both. Both are running WindowsXP as the host VMWare. Both are Pentium4. Recently, I tried to share the image with a co-worker and it pukes out about the time it does some udev stuff at the top of starting up. The (rc.init?) scripts start breaking and spewing lots of errors and ultimately doesn't mount the filesystem properly. We are able to manually mount it later, but then lost of other things are broken. VMware doesn't have any errors we could find, not even in the logs. It seems to be an OS issue. Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all emulated? I tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 CPU settings and removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue happens. Can I not transfer between Intel and AMD CPUs? Is there some magic thing in the kernel I need to set so it can work on both? We attempted several times and tried using VMWare player and also VMWare workstation. It would really suck to have to have him re-compile everything just to get the same dev environment setup as mine. I also posted this on the VMWare forums in case anyone cares: http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=71079 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Jason Weisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gentoo-user] QLogic QLA2xxx driver kernel 2.6.18+
Hi all, Has anyone found a solution to how to load the firmware dirvers on boot in 2.6.18+ kernels. I read something about you need to put the /lib/firmware files into initrd. But I dont know how or where to put it in. My setup is IBM Blade Ceneter with HS20 blades (Intel Xeon cpus) with Qlogic 2412 FC card. I boot from the san so i need the firmware into the kernel. ERROR: QLogic Fibre Channel HBA Driver GSI 19 sharing vector 0xC1 and IRQ 19 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:08.0[A] -> GSI 32 (level, low) -> IRQ 193 qla2xxx :05:08.0: Found an ISP2312, irq 193, iobase 0xc2006000 qla2xxx :05:08.0: Configuring PCI space... qla2xxx :05:08.0: Configure NVRAM parameters... qla2xxx :05:08.0: Verifying loaded RISC code... qla2xxx :05:08.0: Firmware image unavailable. qla2xxx :05:08.0: Firmware images can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/. qla2xxx :05:08.0: Failed to initialize adapter GSI 20 sharing vector 0xC9 and IRQ 20 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:08.1[B] -> GSI 33 (level, low) -> IRQ 201 qla2xxx :05:08.1: Found an ISP2312, irq 201, iobase 0xc2006000 qla2xxx :05:08.1: Configuring PCI space... qla2xxx :05:08.1: Configure NVRAM parameters... qla2xxx :05:08.1: Verifying loaded RISC code... qla2xxx :05:08.1: Firmware image unavailable. qla2xxx :05:08.1: Firmware images can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/. qla2xxx :05:08.1: Failed to initialize adapter Kveðja / Regards Ásgeir Halldórsson E.C. Software
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Norberto Bensa wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, > > > swap is nearly never touched :) > > > > swap was only an example. Things that kill performance: big tar, big copy > > around, and everything that touches a lot of files > > Check your DMA settings > my DMA settings are ok. Really, really. hdparm /dev/hda /dev/hda: multcount= 16 (on) IO_support = 1 (32-bit) unmaskirq= 1 (on) using_dma= 1 (on) keepsettings = 0 (off) readonly = 0 (off) readahead= 256 (on) geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234493056, start = 0 [ 36.419597] hda: 234493056 sectors (120060 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(100) and [ 37.500706] ahci :03:00.0: AHCI 0001. 32 slots 1 ports 3 Gbps 0x1 impl SATA mode [ 37.501239] ahci :03:00.0: flags: 64bit ncq pm led clo pmp pio slum part [ 37.501632] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC2004100 ctl 0x0 bmdma 0x0 irq 35 [ 37.502167] scsi0 : ahci [ 37.987972] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) [ 37.988743] ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 312581808 sectors: LBA48 [ 37.989026] ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16 [ 37.989838] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 [ 37.990176] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD1600JS-00M 10.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 37.990773] SCSI device sda: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB) [ 37.991061] sda: Write Protect is off [ 37.991339] sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 [ 37.991349] SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back [ 37.991657] SCSI device sda: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB) [ 37.991942] sda: Write Protect is off [ 37.992225] sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 [ 37.992235] SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back [ 37.992514] sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 sda6 > [ 38.033040] sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
> > > Gabriel Rossetti wrote: >> > I feel like a newbie > -- So do I, they are very tasty! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, swap > > is nearly never touched :) > > swap was only an example. Things that kill performance: big tar, big copy > around, and everything that touches a lot of files Check your DMA settings Regards, Norberto pgpBQdwAA5Xwf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xmcd problem?
Bayrouni a écrit : Sorry, my post was destined to an other mailing list. It time for me to go to bed. Here it is 3:55 Good night. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: xmcd problem?
Listscribbler a écrit : > I have xmcd_2.6-19_i386.deb installed on an etch laptop. I cannot figure > out how to use xmcd to rip ogg files off audio CDs. > Use cdparanoia to rip from CD audio to wav and oggenc to encode from wav to ogg. Both cdparanoia and oggenc are easy to use after reading their man pages. You can also create a script to do the work for you. This is only for command line lovers . Bayrouni -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
On 2/6/07, Ric de France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 07/02/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > > > That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to > > this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted > > so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a > > stupid mistake on my part. > > > > Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you all > > with this... > > > > Gabriel > > I think we've all made that mistake at some point! > > No need to apologize, it's something to learn from. At least now when > the next newbie makes the same mistake you are in a position to help > them in return :-) Just curious... but does genkernel automatically mount /boot? I use genkernel, and have never had any issues, but I'm pretty sure that I've always mounted /boot before running the genkernel command. Yes, genkernel mounts /boot right after launched... -- Daniel da Veiga Computer Operator - RS - Brazil -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > > > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not > > > > a single > > > > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing > > > > into it takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is > > > > back again. Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this > > > > happens. Reading email and browsing the web is all that is needed. > > > > CPU is at 3-5% according to > > > > top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. > > > > > > Maybe a faulty hard drive with bad sectors that can't be read. Anything > > > in /var/log/messages or any other log file? > > > > > > -- > > > Pierre-Yves Rofes > > > > I am not sure that something is 'broken'. His problem is like mine... > > heavy disk i/o kills performance. And if the box hits swap, everything > > sucks because for some reason, always the wrong stuff is swapped out > > ;) Really, sometimes, it is like every single bit is fetched individually > > from the swap space... > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, swap > is nearly never touched :) > > swap was only an example. Things that kill performance: big tar, big copy around, and everything that touches a lot of files -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
On 07/02/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to > this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted > so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a > stupid mistake on my part. > > Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you all > with this... > > Gabriel I think we've all made that mistake at some point! No need to apologize, it's something to learn from. At least now when the next newbie makes the same mistake you are in a position to help them in return :-) Just curious... but does genkernel automatically mount /boot? I use genkernel, and have never had any issues, but I'm pretty sure that I've always mounted /boot before running the genkernel command. Anyone know? (Guess I could see for myself, but I'm not in front of my Linux box at the moment) ...Ric -- Ric de France Ph: +61412945554 (international) or 0412945554 (Australia) ==> Do you, uh... Gentoo? Gent-hooo!! <== ==> http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml <== -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
Hi, Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > > > single > > > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into > > > it takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is back > > > again. Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this > > > happens. Reading email and browsing the web is all that is needed. CPU > > > is at 3-5% according to > > > top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. > > Maybe a faulty hard drive with bad sectors that can't be read. Anything > > in /var/log/messages or any other log file? > > > > -- > > Pierre-Yves Rofes > > I am not sure that something is 'broken'. His problem is like mine... heavy > disk i/o kills performance. And if the box hits swap, everything sucks > because for some reason, always the wrong stuff is swapped out ;) > Really, sometimes, it is like every single bit is fetched individually from > the swap space... I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, swap is nearly never touched :) Thanks, Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
Hi, Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Pierre-Yves Rofes: > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > > single > > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into it > > takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is back again. > > Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this happens. Reading > > email and browsing the web is all that is needed. CPU is at 3-5% > > according to > > top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. > Maybe a faulty hard drive with bad sectors that can't be read. Anything in > /var/log/messages or any other log file? no sorry, I should have mentioned that. Nothing in the logs. I am currently trying out, what Etaoin Shrdlu suggested in the thread "Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking". I switched from cfq to deadline scheduler. No hang since I did that. Maybe that did the trick? I'll let you know :) > Pierre-Yves Rofes Thanks, Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > Hi List, > > I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my > > feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with > > each > > version. > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > > single > > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into it > > takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is back again. > > Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this happens. Reading > > email and browsing the web is all that is needed. CPU is at 3-5% > > according to > > top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. > > I can somehow force this behaviour by doing some harddisc io, eg untaring > > a > > kernel-tarball. But it does not happen everytime I do this. > > This is really, really annoying. I have no idea, if this is a kernel, a > > FS or > > any other issue. Any help with this is most welcome. > > Some additional info: fs is xfs, kernel is 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 and I'm a > > KDE-User, but this also happens with xfce4 ;) > > Maybe a faulty hard drive with bad sectors that can't be read. Anything in > /var/log/messages or any other log file? > > -- > Pierre-Yves Rofes I am not sure that something is 'broken'. His problem is like mine... heavy disk i/o kills performance. And if the box hits swap, everything sucks because for some reason, always the wrong stuff is swapped out ;) Really, sometimes, it is like every single bit is fetched individually from the swap space... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
> What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the > deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers? > If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read > Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better > after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk. > Of course, your problem might be caused by something else altogether. I have tried the three available schedulers but unfortunately this has no effect. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi List, > I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my > feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with > each > version. > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > single > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into it > takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is back again. > Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this happens. Reading > email and browsing the web is all that is needed. CPU is at 3-5% according > to > top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. > I can somehow force this behaviour by doing some harddisc io, eg untaring > a > kernel-tarball. But it does not happen everytime I do this. > This is really, really annoying. I have no idea, if this is a kernel, a FS > or > any other issue. Any help with this is most welcome. > Some additional info: fs is xfs, kernel is 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 and I'm a > KDE-User, but this also happens with xfce4 ;) > Maybe a faulty hard drive with bad sectors that can't be read. Anything in /var/log/messages or any other log file? -- Pierre-Yves Rofes -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
> What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the > deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers? > If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read > Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better > after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk. > Of course, your problem might be caused by something else altogether. At the moment i use the CFQ-scheduler others are not compiled in the kernel, I will compile one and tell you if this gives any improvements. Regards Daniel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
Michael Schreckenbauer schrieb: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier: >> Hi all, >> i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself. >> This are the main components. > > that's very interesting. You seem to have exactly the same problem I posted > one minute before you :) > My machine is an amd64 3000, with via based board, gentoo compiled for ~x86. > Any chance you are using xfs? > > Regards, > Michael > No i use ext2 for boot and ext3 for all other filesystems I don't know if it also happens when my system is in an idle state, i have to investigate on this! Regards Daniel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Open Office 2.0.4 and fonts
Greetings; I just upgraded Open Office from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4 (yes, I'm behind). Now, I can't use any of the fonts other than the ones which come with Open Office. All my existing fonts which I added were being substituted with other fonts. I emptied the directory /usr/lib/openoffice/share/fonts/truetype and tried to reinstall, as root and then as user (using spadmin). Still doesn't work. I tried copying the fonts over manually. Doesn't work. I deleted ~/.ooo-2.0. Doesn't work. I tried running as root. Doesn't work. I tried all of this on my other computer, which I just upgraded as well. Doesn't work there either. I tried searching the bug list and the gentoo forum. Couldn't find anything relevant . . . My USE flags (on this box at least) are: root $ emerge -pv openoffice These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.4 USE="cairo cups dbus firefox gnome gstreamer gtk java kde ldap pam -binfilter -branding -debug -eds -odk -sound -webdav" LINGUAS="en_GB en_US -af -ar -be_BY -bg -bn -bs -ca -cs -cy -da -de -el -en -en_ZA -es -et -fa -fi -fr -gu_IN -he -hi_IN -hr -hu -it -ja -km -ko -lt -lv -mk -nb -nl -nn -nr -ns -pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -ru -rw -sh_YU -sk -sl -sr_CS -st -sv -sw_TZ -th -tn -tr -ts -vi -xh -zh_CN -zh_TW -zu" 0 kB Yea. Any suggestions? Thanks so very much. Adrian -- On The Fly Photography -:- Creation From Chaos On The Fly Photography: http://204EastSouth.com Purchase from On The Fly: http://204EastSouth.com/OTFStore.htm The Cynical Libertarian Society: http://www.204EastSouth.com/cls -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
Hi, Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier: > Hi all, > i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself. > This are the main components. that's very interesting. You seem to have exactly the same problem I posted one minute before you :) My machine is an amd64 3000, with via based board, gentoo compiled for ~x86. Any chance you are using xfs? Regards, Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
On Tuesday 6 February 2007 21:31, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > On the other i recently recognized when i doing some video editing > i.e. demultiplex the movie with projectx which shows the speed of > writing video and audio to the disk. It writes about 200MB with about > 25MB/s then it halts for about 2-3 seconds and starts again writing > data to the disk, after another 200MB it halts again and starts over > again and so on. I also recognize the same behavior when i multiplex > the video and audio together with mplex. What could cause this > problems What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers? If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk. Of course, your problem might be caused by something else altogether. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
Hi all, i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself. This are the main components. Mainboard: ConRoeXFire-eSATA2 (Intel(r) 945P) CPU:Core 2 Duo E6600 (2400 MHz) RAM:Transcend DIMM 2x1 GB DDR2-667 (1024 MB) Harddisk: Western Digital Caviar SE WD2000JD (200 GB) [Sata] DVD:Samsung SH-S183A (18 / 8 / 8 fach) [Sata] Graphics: Giga-Byte GeForce 7300 LE 128MB GV-NX73L128D (128 MB) Network:Gigabit (10/100/1000 MBit/s) I have managed to get all the stuff i want to work with gentoo. On one hand my new machine is very fast. Here is an example from genlop genlop -i openoffice * app-office/openoffice Total builds: 1 Global build time: 3 hours, 1 minute and 47 seconds. Info about currently installed ebuild: * app-office/openoffice-2.0.4 Install date: Tue Jan 30 04:34:33 2007 USE="branding cairo cups dbus firefox ldap sound pam -binfilter -eds -gnome -gstreamer -gtk -kde -odk -webdav -debug" CFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" On the other i recently recognized when i doing some video editing i.e. demultiplex the movie with projectx which shows the speed of writing video and audio to the disk. It writes about 200MB with about 25MB/s then it halts for about 2-3 seconds and starts again writing data to the disk, after another 200MB it halts again and starts over again and so on. I also recognize the same behavior when i multiplex the video and audio together with mplex. What could cause this problems Also when some one of this tasks is running and i want to do some multitasking, the system reacts very slow on executing other programs. For example if i try to open just an editor by the start menu. The menu seems to be frozen and did not react at once also it took very long for the editor to load. I thought of wrong settings in cflags, or a wrong kernel config maybe the sata-controller or other things which may cause this problems. Thanks in advance for your help Daniel Pielmeier Here are a few things which might give some information over my system: kernel config # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_X86_PC=y CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_XADD=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7 CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_TSC=y CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8 CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y CONFIG_PREEMPT=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_MCE=y CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL=m CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y CONFIG_VM86=y CONFIG_X86_CPUID=y # # ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support # CONFIG_IDE=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=m # # IDE chipset support/bugfixes # CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y CONFIG_IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y # # SCSI device support # CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_SCSI_PROC_FS=y # # SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM) # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=m CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=m # # SCSI low-level drivers # CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=y CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI=y CONFIG_SCSI_ATA_PIIX=y CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_INTEL_COMBINED=y CONFIG_SCSI_PPA=m CONFIG_SCSI_IMM=m CONFIG_SCSI_IZIP_EPP16=y CONFIG_SCSI_IZIP_SLOW_CTR=y cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 2393.448 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 4790.29 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 2393.448 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16
[gentoo-user] Very bad system response
Hi List, I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with each version. From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a single application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into it takes forever. After a while (up to ~30s ) normal reaction is back again. Strange thing is, there is no activity at the times this happens. Reading email and browsing the web is all that is needed. CPU is at 3-5% according to top, mem has ~1GB free according to free. I can somehow force this behaviour by doing some harddisc io, eg untaring a kernel-tarball. But it does not happen everytime I do this. This is really, really annoying. I have no idea, if this is a kernel, a FS or any other issue. Any help with this is most welcome. Some additional info: fs is xfs, kernel is 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 and I'm a KDE-User, but this also happens with xfce4 ;) Thanks, Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else? I'm not seeing them > myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the > ether. I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't > think it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about > kde-meta and kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. > Same with a comment I sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time. > > Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail. Your mails are not getting lost as I do receive copies. I got your repsonse to Dale's thread about kate/kwrite at 21:00 local time (GMT +2), with the following headers: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -8.5 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [140.105.134.102]) by linuxholdings.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C73C1AB4197 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:28:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l16JEf7l011539; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:14:41 GMT Delivered-To: Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l16J5J1F027818 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:05:19 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0DF18551 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:05:19 + (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qTC5VGiMM2tu for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:05:17 + (UTC) Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net (adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530A3184DD for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:05:17 + (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There doesn't seem to be any significant delay there, beyond 5 minutes lag at one point - easily ascribed to a full mail queue or other routine causes. But the mail certianly isn't getting lost wholesale. alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to > this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted > so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a > stupid mistake on my part. > > Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you all > with this... > > Gabriel I think we've all made that mistake at some point! No need to apologize, it's something to learn from. At least now when the next newbie makes the same mistake you are in a position to help them in return :-) alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Completely lost regarding wifi
On 05/02/07, Sigfrido V. Ortiz C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Review next section, after your WiFi card be right installed: nano -w /etc/conf.d/wireless.example If you follow that instructions as well as the provided by your school, It will be so easy to you. About Gentoo Networking please look at here for x86 processor: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=3 and http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4 Sigfrido I'm much closer than I have been before. Following the LEAP example, I seem to manage to connect. iwconfig tells me I have an encryption key. The only issue now seems to be that I can't get dhcp working. Nothing relevant runs automatically, and when I run dhcpcd manually it times out. Then, after I have run dhcpcd, or if I just wait a while, when I do iwconfig it tells me that I an unassociated. . . I feel close, but I'm not quite there yet >.<. Thanks, Henk Boom -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
Gabriel Rossetti am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 16:20: > Harm Geerts wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the > >> "linux" link, then cd inside > >> and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, > >> I do a uname -a > >> and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot > >> directory, and the links are correct, > >> then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried > >> gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. > >> > >> Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > Do you have a seperate /boot partition and forgot to mount it before > > installing the kernel? > > Harm! > > That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to > this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted > so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a > stupid mistake on my part. # umount /boot; touch /boot/YOU__FORGOT__TO__MOUNT__BOOT :-) Dani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Kwrite and CPU usage and locking up when scrolling
On Monday 05 February 2007 22:41, Dale wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> >> Calculating dependencies... done!
> >> [ebuild U ] kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.6-r2 [3.5.5-r7] USE="acl alsa
> >> arts cups doc fam jpeg2k spell ssl tiff -avahi -debug -kdeenablefinal
> >> -kdehiddenvisibility -kerberos -legacyssl -lua -openexr -utempter
> >> -xinerama -zeroconf" LINGUAS="-he" 15,186 kB
> >> [ebuild U ] kde-base/kate-3.5.6 [3.5.5-r1] USE="arts -debug
> >> -kdeenablefinal -kdehiddenvisibility -xinerama" 23,589 kB
> >
> > That version works fine.
>
> Well, I'm trying to mask this so it will not upgrade when I do updates.
> I must be missing something here. When I did the pretend downgrade it
> pulled kdelibs down one version too. So I want to make it so that
> kdelibs and kate will stay at 3.5.5 versions. This is what I added to
>
> package.mask:
> > =kde-base/kate-3.5.6
> > =kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.6-r2
>
> That way if there is a new release it will upgrade and hopefully it will
> be fixed. However, this is what happens when I check for updates:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating world dependencies \
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~kde-base/kate-3.5.6" have been
> > masked.
> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > request:
> > - kde-base/kate-3.5.6 (masked by: package.mask)
> >
> > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
> > page or
> > refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> > (dependency required by "kde-base/kdebase-meta-3.5.6" [ebuild])
> >
>
> Do I need to mask kde-meta too or is there some other way around this??
> < scratches head >
Bringing kde-meta up to version 3.5.6 is going to want to upgrade ALL it's
dependencies to 3.5.6 (which includes kate).
To maintain different versions of of the various KDE packages, you'll need
to
remove the kde-meta package. To make sure 'emerge -u world' (or a
variant),
pulls in new version of other packages, you'll want to 'emerge -n' the
various direct dependencies of kde-meta (kdenetwork-meta etc).
I doubt kate is a direct dependency of kde-meta (I could be wrong). If it
isn't, one (or more) of the other kde${stuff}-meta packages will also try
to
upgrade it. Instead of 'emerge -n'-ing those packages, 'emerge -n' it's
direct dependencies (one of which should be kate).
You may actually find some packages that you don't care about, feel free to
not 'emerge -n' them. They will then not be updated by an 'emerge -u
world'
and my be removed be 'emerge --depclean' (unless they are a dependency of
some other package in world)
In fact, I recently removed all the kde${stuff}-meta packages from my
system
and only installed the KDE applications I wanted. This might result in
significant disk space savings, but YMMV. I now have ~90 packages from the
kde-base category instead of the ~350 pulled in by kde-meta.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW!
pgpQeqL1O1U9j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 19:26:46 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > [...] but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and > kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. gmane and I haven't seen that one either... :) Complaints go to bug #141904 [1]. Logs with mail id's is a requirement though. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141904 -- Bo Andresen pgpOCtUiqgzu9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:26:46PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else? I'm not seeing them > myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the > ether. I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think > it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and > kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. Same with a comment I > sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time. > Last list mail I have from you is dated 2-2. festus -- Disobedience, in the eyes of any one who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion. -- Oscar Wilde pgpXVcdVcsQRO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:26 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else? I'm not seeing them > > myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the > > ether. I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think > > it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and > > kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. Same with a comment I > > sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time. > > > > Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail. > > > > I sent in a post yesterday afternoon. My mail logs say it was sent, but > I haven't seen it. I'm not using gmail either. I guess this list just does not send the message to its originator, I do not see mine either. -- When eating an elephant take one bite at a time. -- Gen. C. Abrams Michal 'vorner' Vaner pgpwO9nYlHS4b.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?
Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else? I'm not seeing them myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the ether. I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. Same with a comment I sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time. Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW! pgp7FBQhffdcD.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] System Crash
Hello list, This morning I noticed that my machine was frozen (would not respond to keyboard or mouse, so couldn't ctrl+alt+func_key to a terminal or anything, I couldn't ping it either). I reset it and started chugging along... or so I thought. This machine is my firewall. Everytime a client attempts to connect to eth1, the machine crashes. Prior to the most recent crash I switched to a console session so I could see messages coming to the screen and I saw something to the tune of: BUG: soft lockup detected on cpu#0! ... dump trace 0x69/ox1af show_trace_log lvl +0x18/0x2... show_trace+0xf/0x11 dump_stack 0x15/ 0x12 softlockup_tick 0xad/0xc4 ... smp_apic_timer_interrupt 0x9f/0xbb apic_timer_interrupt 0x2a/0x30 _do_softirq_0x68/0xeb do_softirq ox4a/0xc3 === I can induce the crash at will by: 1. booting the firewall 2. booting the client that is connected to eth1 or (if the client is booted) 1. boot the firewall 2. disconnect the cable that is plugged into eth1 and plug it into eth2 (if the client is booted) 1. boot the firewall 2. change the ip parameters on the client and ping the firewall I'm running 2.6.19-r1. I've been using that kernel for probably 1 month or so. The most recent change I made to the machine was installing Shorewall and recompiling the kernel to add the ip masq stuff. The machine ran all weekend with no hitches. Last night my wife's laptop was connected to eth1 and she was surfing the net just fine, I disconnected her laptop and connected my laptop and I surfed the net just fine. I woke up this morning and noticed this trouble? Have any of yous guys seen anything like this before? Thanks, Shawn "Doing linear scans over an associative array is like trying to club someone to death with a loaded Uzi." Larry Wall
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Harm Geerts wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Hello, I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. Does anyone have any ideas? Do you have a seperate /boot partition and forgot to mount it before installing the kernel? Harm! That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a stupid mistake on my part. Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you all with this... Gabriel I feel like a newbie -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Automounting drives, partitions & udev, mtab & fstab
There are some basic configuration options in the "Removable Drives and Media" applet in Gnome, but not much else that I can see. But it is obviously Gnome Volume Manager that is doing some of the work that results in removable media drive icons that show up on my Desktop, as when I boot into xfc4, my removable media doesn't even mount, at least automatically. doug On 2/5/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 05 February 2007, Douglas Linford wrote: > Alan, > > Thank you for the explanation...some of this helps, I already knew > about the mount command. I have hal and dbus installed...what GUI > tools for those apps were you refering to? In KDE it's controlled by kcontrol - that enormous config app with 1000s of selectable options. There's a selection near the top of the menu which asks you which icons to display on the desktop. Options include a large range of mounted and unmounted storage device types. I can't help much with Gnome (I don't use it) but surely it will be part of the vast array of configuration options available in the Preferences menu. This is installed automatically with Gnome. In my limited experience with Gnome I have always found that a device can be accessed through the middle Other menu alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Hi, On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:37:05 -0300 "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you are not putting the kernel on the real /boot and your grub > and kernel images are all... stored somewhere else, like the > real /boot? Yes, /boot _is_ apparently on a single partition (see grub config). Question is: Is that partition mounted (or better: was it when installing the kernel)? -hwh -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] help with emerge package recompile
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:09:44 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote: > Alternately, you could use an NFS share to make /usr/portage/distfiles > shared with all the computers on your network. If you have more than > one gentoo box, that is ; ) You don;t need to be running Gentoo on the distfiles host. It doesn't even have to be Linux, you could point $DISTDIR to a Samba mount on a Windows box. This is useful if you have, say, a laptop with limited disk space running Gentoo. -- Neil Bothwick If you think that you can truncate my sig to 75 chars, then you can just fu signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4 - SOLVED
Harm Geerts wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Hello, I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. Does anyone have any ideas? Do you have a seperate /boot partition and forgot to mount it before installing the kernel? Harm! That's it, I never did that (not automaount /boot), but I decided to this time, so like you said, my /boot was not mounted so everything was right, but at the same time it wasn'tThat was a stupid mistake on my part. Thanks to all those that answered and sorry for bothering you all with this... Gabriel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Ric de France wrote: Hi Gabriel, On 07/02/07, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. It sounds like you're doing the right thing. Could you do a: $ ls -al /boot $ cat /boot/grub/grub.conf $ ls -al /usr/src and then post the outputs to this list? ...Ric Hi Ric, yes, here is what you asked for : [snip listings] PS I have not changed my way of compiling / installing the kernel for at least 4 years (since switching to 2.6 kernel series) Well, everything there looks just fine and how it should be, and you do appear to know exactly how to compile kernels. It looks to me like you slipped up just this once and have a PEBKAC or a made a little typo - it happens :-) If you run 'strings' on /boot/vmlinuz, is that really a 2.6.20 image? Did you verify that /usr/src/linux-2.6.20 really does contain a 2.6.20 tree by examining the actual files? alan here's the output of "strings" strings /boot/vmlinuz | grep 2.6 2.6.20-gentoo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 6 14:09:46 UTC 2007 I didn't check the kernel tree against my files because I'm not really sure how to do that :-) Gabriel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with udev
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:13:04 +0100, jcd wrote: > Thank you very much. It is OK now. However, I followed this > documentation and there is described my approach (bad approach) > http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html . Some of the sysfs naming has changed since that page was last updated. -- Neil Bothwick "Bother," said Pooh, as the EEC outlawed his favourite sized honey pot. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Completely lost regarding wifi
YoYo Siska wrote: > As for WPA you need additional software to do the encryption (well, to > the key exchange and such stuff...). The best choice now is > wpa_supplicant. In the /etc/conf.d/net.eth0 just put > modules_eth0=( "wpa_supplicant" ) > and relevant config_ESSID and probably routes_ESSID (for dhcp you can > just leave it). To set up the WPA options you have to edit > /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf. > Forgot just the second important thig for wpa_supplicant and ipw2200, beside modules_eth0: wpa_supplicant_eth0="-Dwext" yoyo :w -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Completely lost regarding wifi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:51:09PM -0500, Henk Boom wrote:
> (I had some trouble posting this message the first time, so I
> apologize if it appears twice)
>
> Hi, last fall I spent some of my summer earnings on a ThinkPad X41
> tablet, and have been loving it ever since I installed Gentoo on it.
> There is one thing I have not yet been able to make work, though, and
> that is wifi. This is probably due to a combination of my own lack of
> wifi-related experience and the fact that my school (the only
> practical place I have to use wifi) seems to use a horrendously
> complicated setup >.<. I have heard that others with this laptop have
> managed to make wifi work.
>
> I have been trying different things on and off for a few month now,
> but the fact is that I have very little idea of how to configure wifi,
> and there seems to be little documentation that I can find which is
> relevant to this situation. I've decided that there's little left to
> do except bug all of you with my problem =(.
>
> My school has some Windows/Mac setup instructions here (scroll down a bit):
> http://rorschach.concordia.ca/neg/remote_access/wireless/
> They mention Xsupplicant in relation to Linux, but once again I find
> myself way out of my depth. . .
>
> lspci lists my wifi card as:
> 04:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG
> Network Connection (rev 05)
>
> I am using the ipw2200 module, and the wifi card shows up under
> iwconfig as eth1.
>
Hi I have X41Tablet too, although with the 2915ABG wifi chipset (because
of the built-in bluetooth ;-) but it uses the same driver and should
work in the same way (I used to have R51 with 2200).
As for the wifi, there are basically 3 different modes, unencrypted, WEP,
and WPA (there are many kinds of WPA, but that doesn't really matter in
the way of configuring it under gentoo w ipw2200).
For the unencrypted and WEP cases, all you need are wireless-tools and
gentoo initscripts, good examples are in /etc/conf.d/wireless. You
configure few things for the whole interface (such as preferred_aps) and
others per access point (essid) such as encryption key and actual tcp/ip
configuration. Gentoo initscripts than choose an access point in range
and connect to it.
Just put these into any of the relevant config files ( wireless, net,
net.eth0 or net.eth1 depending on which is your wifi, all in
/etc/conf.d):
# this should be default and thus not needed
modules_eth0=( "iwconfig" )
config_ESSID1=( "dhcp" ) # not needed too
key_ESSID1="abcdefabcd"
config_ESSID2=( "10.0.0.13 netmask 255.255.255.0" )
routes_ESSID2=( "defualt via 10.0.0.1" )
...
Then just start the interface...
As for WPA you need additional software to do the encryption (well, to
the key exchange and such stuff...). The best choice now is
wpa_supplicant. In the /etc/conf.d/net.eth0 just put
modules_eth0=( "wpa_supplicant" )
and relevant config_ESSID and probably routes_ESSID (for dhcp you can
just leave it). To set up the WPA options you have to edit
/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf.
There are many ways to do authentication/key exchange in WPA, from the
windows configuration on the page you mentioned it seems that you need
LEAP authentication (used by cisco) or PEAP + MSCHAPv2. The relevant part of the
wpa_supplicant should look like this:
network={
ssid="REftRW2d"
key_mgmt=IEEE8021X
eap=LEAP
identity="user"
password="pass"
}
or for PEAP+MSCHAPv2:
network={
ssid="REftRW2d"
key_mgmt=WPA-EAP
eap=PEAP
identity="user"
password="pass"
# this shiould not be needed
phase2="auth=MSCHAPV2"
}
I haven't actually used LEAP myself, so this is only a guess, feel free
to google for LEAP wpa_supplicant, or try asking people that managed to
get it running on your school.
As for the essids (ssids), under root, just run
iwlist eth0 scan
to see the list of wireless networks in range (or use some graphical
utility). wpa_supplicant uses to power down the wifi, so you may need to
do
iwconfig eth0 txpower on
to see some results.
If you need more help, feel free to mail me off list...
--
_
|
YoYo () Siska
http://www.ksp.sk/
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > Hello, > > I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the > "linux" link, then cd inside > and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, > I do a uname -a > and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot > directory, and the links are correct, > then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried > gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. > > Does anyone have any ideas? Do you have a seperate /boot partition and forgot to mount it before installing the kernel? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKinnon wrote: > If you run 'strings' on /boot/vmlinuz, is that really a 2.6.20 image? > Did you verify that /usr/src/linux-2.6.20 really does contain a 2.6.20 > tree by examining the actual files? Maybe you are not putting the kernel on the real /boot and your grub and kernel images are all... stored somewhere else, like the real /boot? - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica Mail Hosting Seguro y Consultoria - http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFyISBAlpOsGhXcE0RAv6FAJ9xj4lgQRfg/V7Meuq9G7fkjpcVJQCfTY+S uZdIcHPUdxqJkHNjh62GDv0= =JX/A -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Hello, I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. Does anyone have any ideas? Gabriel There is some more info, if I do : grep -r 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 linux I get : linux/include/linux/autoconf.h:#define CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE "2.6.19-gentoo-r4" linux/include/config/auto.conf:CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE="2.6.19-gentoo-r4 " but my linux symlink is from the 2.6.20 kernel, not 2.6.19-r4 : ls -la total 3 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 Feb 6 11:29 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 496 Jan 31 20:42 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Aug 3 2006 .keep lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 6 11:29 linux -> linux-2.6.20-gentoo drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1296 Feb 6 09:44 linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 6 11:45 linux-2.6.20-gentoo Thanks, Gabriel did you do a make menuconfig from scratch, or did you copy an old .config over from a prior release? It looks like the latter may have happened and your .config does not agree with what is actually in the source tree. Either that or you have a 2.6.19-r4 source tree thaqt is named 2.6.20 alan Thanks for your reply Alan, I copied over my .config and did a "make oldconfig" then I had to choose the new options. Gabriel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > Ric de France wrote: > > Hi Gabriel, > > > > On 07/02/07, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create > >> the "linux" link, then cd inside > >> and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from > >> modules, I do a uname -a > >> and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot > >> directory, and the links are correct, > >> then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried > >> gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. > > > > It sounds like you're doing the right thing. Could you do a: > > > > $ ls -al /boot > > $ cat /boot/grub/grub.conf > > $ ls -al /usr/src > > > > and then post the outputs to this list? > > > > ...Ric > > Hi Ric, > > yes, here is what you asked for : [snip listings] > PS > I have not changed my way of compiling / installing the kernel for at > least 4 years (since switching to 2.6 kernel series) Well, everything there looks just fine and how it should be, and you do appear to know exactly how to compile kernels. It looks to me like you slipped up just this once and have a PEBKAC or a made a little typo - it happens :-) If you run 'strings' on /boot/vmlinuz, is that really a 2.6.20 image? Did you verify that /usr/src/linux-2.6.20 really does contain a 2.6.20 tree by examining the actual files? alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with udev
> The first item should be SUBSYSTEMS, not SUBSYSTEM. The second should be
> ATTRS{model}; as in
>
> SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi", ATTRS{model}=="LYRA_MPHR2301_EU", SYMLINK+="lyra"
>
> If you cut and paste from the udevinfo output to your rules file, you
> avoid such errors.
Thank you very much. It is OK now. However, I followed this
documentation and there is described my approach (bad approach)
http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html .
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo VMWare image works on Intel but not AMD. Are they not interchangeable?
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote: > On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:27:01 +0300, Alan McKinnon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all > >> emulated? I tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 > >> CPU settings and removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue > >> happens. > > > > The host CPU shouldn't make a difference as a VMWare .vmx is > > supposed to work the same on all hosts. However, the VMWare version > > in use on your friend's machine might be broken on AMD, or he has > > done something dumb. > > No, it does make difference. The guest OS uses the same CPU as the > host, with the exception of the number of available cores. If there > are 2 or more cores on the host, including virtual ones through > multithreading, the guest may use 1 or 2 cores. If the host has only > one core, the guest must be configured to use only one. Ah, this does make sense. Daevid, you say you use a P4,a nd your friend is AMD. Does he perhaps have an AMD64 or AMD dual core machine? alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the > > "linux" link, then cd inside > > and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from > > modules, I do a uname -a > > and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot > > directory, and the links are correct, > > then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried > > gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > Gabriel > > There is some more info, if I do : > > grep -r 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 linux > > I get : > > linux/include/linux/autoconf.h:#define CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE > "2.6.19-gentoo-r4" > linux/include/config/auto.conf:CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE="2.6.19-gentoo-r4 >" > > but my linux symlink is from the 2.6.20 kernel, not 2.6.19-r4 : > > ls -la > total 3 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 Feb 6 11:29 . > drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 496 Jan 31 20:42 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Aug 3 2006 .keep > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 6 11:29 linux -> > linux-2.6.20-gentoo drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1296 Feb 6 09:44 > linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 6 11:45 > linux-2.6.20-gentoo > > > Thanks, > Gabriel did you do a make menuconfig from scratch, or did you copy an old .config over from a prior release? It looks like the latter may have happened and your .config does not agree with what is actually in the source tree. Either that or you have a 2.6.19-r4 source tree thaqt is named 2.6.20 alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Ric de France wrote: Hi Gabriel, On 07/02/07, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. It sounds like you're doing the right thing. Could you do a: $ ls -al /boot $ cat /boot/grub/grub.conf $ ls -al /usr/src and then post the outputs to this list? ...Ric Hi Ric, yes, here is what you asked for : ls -al /boot total 12526 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 792 Feb 6 11:45 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 576 Jan 20 16:37 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Feb 6 11:45 System.map -> System.map-2.6.20-gentoo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 999613 Feb 6 09:44 System.map-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 999613 Feb 6 09:09 System.map-2.6.19-gentoo-r5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 999613 Feb 6 09:00 System.map-2.6.19-gentoo-r5.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1016626 Feb 6 11:45 System.map-2.6.20-gentoo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Feb 6 09:44 System.map.old -> System.map-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Jan 19 13:42 boot -> . lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Feb 6 11:45 config -> config-2.6.20-gentoo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43780 Feb 6 09:44 config-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43780 Feb 6 09:09 config-2.6.19-gentoo-r5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43780 Feb 6 09:00 config-2.6.19-gentoo-r5.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 44623 Feb 6 11:45 config-2.6.20-gentoo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Feb 6 09:44 config.old -> config-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 672 Feb 6 12:58 grub lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Feb 6 11:45 vmlinuz -> vmlinuz-2.6.20-gentoo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2145374 Feb 6 09:44 vmlinuz-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2145431 Feb 6 09:09 vmlinuz-2.6.19-gentoo-r5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2145430 Feb 6 09:00 vmlinuz-2.6.19-gentoo-r5.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2159920 Feb 6 11:45 vmlinuz-2.6.20-gentoo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Feb 6 09:44 vmlinuz.old -> vmlinuz-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 - cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # # Grub Configuration file # # Load the splash image splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz # Boot automatically after 30 secs. timeout 10 # By default, boot the first entry. default 0 # Fallback to the second entry. fallback 1 # For booting the main version title Gentoo - default runlevel root (hd0,0) kernel (hd0,0)/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda5 vga=0x318 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr:3,[EMAIL PROTECTED] splash=verbose libata.atapi_enabled=1 #initrd /boot/fbsplash # For booting the main version, wireless runlevel title Gentoo - wireless runlevel root (hd0,0) kernel (hd0,0)/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda5 vga=0x318 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr:3,[EMAIL PROTECTED] splash=verbose libata.atapi_enabled=1 softlevel=wireless #kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda5 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr:2,[EMAIL PROTECTED] splash=silent,fadein,theme:livecd-2005.1 gentoo=nodevfs apm=off acpi=on CONSOLE=/dev/tty1 quiet softlevel=wireless #initrd /boot/fbsplash # For booting a fall back version title Fall Back root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz.old root=/dev/sda5 splash=verbose gentoo=nodevfs apm=off acpi=off - ls -al /usr/src total 3 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 Feb 6 11:29 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 496 Jan 31 20:42 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Aug 3 2006 .keep lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 6 11:29 linux -> linux-2.6.20-gentoo drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1296 Feb 6 09:44 linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 6 11:45 linux-2.6.20-gentoo - Thanks Ric! PS I have not changed my way of compiling / installing the kernel for at least 4 years (since switching to 2.6 kernel series) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Problem with udev
Hi.
I read lot of articles about writing udev rules. But I don't know why my
local rules don't work :(.
I have Thomson LYRA mp3 palyer. Currently I have it like /dev/sdc (I
don't know why, but there isn't any sdc(n) indicating partition. When I
mount /dev/sdc to some mount point it works (vfat)). Here is udevinfo:
$udevinfo -a -p /sys/block/sdc
Udevinfo starts with...
looking at device '/block/sdc':
KERNEL=="sdc"
SUBSYSTEM=="block"
DRIVER==""
ATTR{stat}==" 13 13 208 229000
000 2280 2290"
ATTR{size}=="9717520"
ATTR{removable}=="1"
ATTR{range}=="16"
ATTR{dev}=="8:32"
looking at parent device
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-6/1-6:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0':
KERNELS=="8:0:0:0"
SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi"
DRIVERS=="sd"
ATTRS{ioerr_cnt}=="0x0"
ATTRS{iodone_cnt}=="0x25b"
ATTRS{iorequest_cnt}=="0x25b"
ATTRS{iocounterbits}=="32"
ATTRS{timeout}=="30"
ATTRS{state}=="running"
ATTRS{rev}=="0.01"
ATTRS{model}=="LYRA_MPHR2301_EU"
ATTRS{vendor}=="Thomson "
ATTRS{scsi_level}=="3"
ATTRS{type}=="0"
ATTRS{queue_type}=="none"
ATTRS{queue_depth}=="1"
ATTRS{device_blocked}=="0"
ATTRS{max_sectors}=="240"
looking at parent device
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-6/1-6:1.0/host8/target8:0:0':
KERNELS=="target8:0:0"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
looking at parent device
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-6/1-6:1.0/host8':
KERNELS=="host8"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
looking at parent device
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-6/1-6:1.0':
KERNELS=="1-6:1.0"
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb"
DRIVERS=="usb-storage"
ATTRS{modalias}=="usb:v069Bp0738ddc00dsc00dp00ic08isc06ip50"
ATTRS{bInterfaceProtocol}=="50"
ATTRS{bInterfaceSubClass}=="06"
ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}=="08"
ATTRS{bNumEndpoints}=="03"
ATTRS{bAlternateSetting}==" 0"
ATTRS{bInterfaceNumber}=="00"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1/1-6':
KERNELS=="1-6"
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb"
DRIVERS=="usb"
ATTRS{configuration}==""
ATTRS{serial}=="22214F0E7422"
ATTRS{product}=="THOMSON PDP2814"
ATTRS{manufacturer}=="THOMSON"
ATTRS{maxchild}=="0"
ATTRS{version}==" 2.00"
ATTRS{devnum}=="9"
ATTRS{speed}=="480"
ATTRS{bMaxPacketSize0}=="64"
ATTRS{bNumConfigurations}=="1"
ATTRS{bDeviceProtocol}=="00"
ATTRS{bDeviceSubClass}=="00"
ATTRS{bDeviceClass}=="00"
ATTRS{bcdDevice}==""
ATTRS{idProduct}=="0738"
ATTRS{idVendor}=="069b"
ATTRS{bMaxPower}=="100mA"
ATTRS{bmAttributes}=="c0"
ATTRS{bConfigurationValue}=="1"
ATTRS{bNumInterfaces}==" 1"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb1':
KERNELS=="usb1"
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb"
DRIVERS=="usb"
ATTRS{configuration}==""
ATTRS{serial}==":00:1d.7"
ATTRS{product}=="EHCI Host Controller"
ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Linux 2.6.18-gentoo-r2 ehci_hcd"
ATTRS{maxchild}=="8"
ATTRS{version}==" 2.00"
ATTRS{devnum}=="1"
ATTRS{speed}=="480"
ATTRS{bMaxPacketSize0}=="64"
ATTRS{bNumConfigurations}=="1"
ATTRS{bDeviceProtocol}=="01"
ATTRS{bDeviceSubClass}=="00"
ATTRS{bDeviceClass}=="09"
ATTRS{bcdDevice}=="0206"
ATTRS{idProduct}==""
ATTRS{idVendor}==""
ATTRS{bMaxPower}==" 0mA"
ATTRS{bmAttributes}=="e0"
ATTRS{bConfigurationValue}=="1"
ATTRS{bNumInterfaces}==" 1"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7':
KERNELS==":00:1d.7"
SUBSYSTEMS=="pci"
DRIVERS=="ehci_hcd"
ATTRS{broken_parity_status}=="0"
ATTRS{modalias}=="pci:v8086d265Csv103Csd2A0Abc0Csc03i20"
ATTRS{local_cpus}=="ff"
ATTRS{irq}=="18"
ATTRS{class}=="0x0c0320"
ATTRS{subsystem_device}=="0x2a0a"
ATTRS{subsystem_vendor}=="0x103c"
ATTRS{device}=="0x265c"
ATTRS{vendor}=="0x8086"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00':
KERNELS=="pci:00"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
And this is my rule stored in /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules
#Thomson LYRA
SUBSYSTEM=="scsi", SYSFS{model}=="LYRA_MPHR2301_EU", SYMLINK+="lyra"
It must be ok, I think, but when I plug in my mp3 player it don't work.
I tried lot of things but it is till bad.
Finally i decide to ask for help. Thx
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Gabriel Rossetti wrote: Hello, I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. Does anyone have any ideas? Gabriel There is some more info, if I do : grep -r 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 linux I get : linux/include/linux/autoconf.h:#define CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE "2.6.19-gentoo-r4" linux/include/config/auto.conf:CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE="2.6.19-gentoo-r4" but my linux symlink is from the 2.6.20 kernel, not 2.6.19-r4 : ls -la total 3 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 Feb 6 11:29 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 496 Jan 31 20:42 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Aug 3 2006 .keep lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 6 11:29 linux -> linux-2.6.20-gentoo drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1296 Feb 6 09:44 linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 6 11:45 linux-2.6.20-gentoo Thanks, Gabriel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Hi Gabriel, On 07/02/07, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. It sounds like you're doing the right thing. Could you do a: $ ls -al /boot $ cat /boot/grub/grub.conf $ ls -al /usr/src and then post the outputs to this list? ...Ric -- Ric de France Ph: +61412945554 (international) or 0412945554 (Australia) ==> Do you, uh... Gentoo? Gent-hooo!! <== ==> http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml <== -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] dhcpd and routes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a Gentoo server that is running Cisco VPN software to connect to
my companies VPN. I have setup the server as a NAT for the specific
subnet required for the VPN and the rest of my traffic goes through my
router (192.168.1.1). I currently have to manually run the following
command to setup the route:
route add -net 10.4.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.200
On my Gentoo server I run dhcpd to allocate IP addresses for machines on
my LAN. The current configuration is:
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.1.100 192.168.1.199;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
}
So the question is how can I setup dhcpd to automatically setup the
route command for all clients using the dhcpd?
Cheers,
Dave.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFyHKMx43ifHzpDVURAhdrAJ4qDCmtotrW0I3B1JPF7+fVNeQlBwCfZr13
9ZcoJHn+fX8e8tqiWPok05w=
=kJ0P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] no matter what kernel version I compile, It says it's 2.6.19-r4
Hello, I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the "linux" link, then cd inside and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules, I do a uname -a and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i then check in the /boot directory, and the links are correct, then I check my grub.conf and it's correct, I then tried gentoo-sources-2.6.20, still the same thing. Does anyone have any ideas? Gabriel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo VMWare image works on Intel but not AMD. Are they not interchangeable?
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:03:16 -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote: > Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all emulated? I > tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 CPU settings and > removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue happens. The CPU is not emulated, so if your CFLAGS are specific to P4, you may have some programs break on an AMD processor. What is the output of emerge --info in the guest OS? -- Neil Bothwick Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by moving to where you can't find them. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypt USB flash drive
On Tuesday 06 Feb 2007 05:06:29 Thomas Lingefelt wrote: > > I've been using truecrypt between Windows and Linux for just this purpose > > and it works great. Not so sure about MacOS though. > > > > emerge app-crypt/truecrypt > > > > http://www.truecrypt.org/ > > Seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. I'll start implementing > tomorrow morning. Maybe by the time I get a Mac it will have been > ported. Thanks! It would be nice if you could post a HOWTO to the wiki, if it doesn't exist already. I haven't checked yet.. -- Mrugesh Karnik GPG Key 0xBA6F1DA8 Public key on http://wwwkeys.pgp.net pgphK9abt0mtt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Kwrite and CPU usage and locking up when scrolling
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Dale wrote: > I don't understand portage and ebuilds well enough to do that. How > about this. Is there a way to just tell emerge to emerge each > separate package and get rid of kde-meta? kde-meta is, well, as meta package. All it does is tell portage to emerge all the dependencies, and that turns out to be all 300 individual kde ebuilds. kdebase-meta is the same thing on a smaller scale and only for the basic stuff. You could 'emerge -avC kde-meta' and all that would happen is the -meta package gets removed, leaving the deps in place. However, they aren't in world so your next 'emerge --depclean' will want to remove them. Few people actually use all of KDE, so a good compromise is to figure out what you actually do use and emerge just those ebuilds Have you read the kde split-ebuilds HOWTO at gentoo.org/doc lately? It's all in there, but it's a lot of info so it's useful to refresh the old memory every now and again > I don't know, equery list > kde then poke them in one by one. Would that let it leave kate and > kdelibs where it is without masking all of kde? I just tried this test: masked kate-3.5.6 unmerged kdebase-meta emerge -pD world and it went crazy with blockers. Portage wanted to emerge kdebase-3.5.5 (not the -meta) one and that was bloked by all the kdebase packages at version 3.5.6. So it would seem there are some hard coded blocks in place, which is sensible as mixing KDE app and lib versions willy-nilly is probably not a good idea... > Thanks for the reply though. At least I can open the file and read > it and it is not just me having this problem. alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo VMWare image works on Intel but not AMD. Are they not interchangeable?
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:27:01 +0300, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all emulated? I tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 CPU settings and removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue happens. The host CPU shouldn't make a difference as a VMWare .vmx is supposed to work the same on all hosts. However, the VMWare version in use on your friend's machine might be broken on AMD, or he has done something dumb. No, it does make difference. The guest OS uses the same CPU as the host, with the exception of the number of available cores. If there are 2 or more cores on the host, including virtual ones through multithreading, the guest may use 1 or 2 cores. If the host has only one core, the guest must be configured to use only one. -- Andrei Gerasimenko -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Kwrite and CPU usage and locking up when scrolling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Dale wrote: > >> Dale wrote: >> > > First off, I get the same behaviour this end. kwrite borks out on > emerge.log which is about 8M. On a machine with 2G ram this should not > happen. It does the same thing as a kpart in konqueror > > >> Well, I'm trying to mask this so it will not upgrade when I do >> updates. I must be missing something here. When I did the pretend >> downgrade it pulled kdelibs down one version too. So I want to make >> it so that kdelibs and kate will stay at 3.5.5 versions. This is >> what I added to >> >> package.mask: >> >>> =kde-base/kate >>> -3.5.6 >>> =kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.6-r2 >>> > > That will mask those versions, and only those versions. The next upgrade > of either will be emerged. Is this what you want? > I think so. I just want kate to stay at that version because it is borked. Since kdelibs is a dependancy, I assumed I needed to mask it too. > >> That way if there is a new release it will upgrade and hopefully it >> will >> >> be fixed. However, this is what happens when I check for updates: >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world >>> >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >>> >>> Calculating world dependencies \ >>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~kde-base/kate-3.5.6" have been >>> masked. >>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete >>> your request: >>> - kde-base/kate-3.5.6 (masked by: package.mask) >>> >>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man >>> page or >>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook. >>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdebase-meta-3.5.6" [ebuild]) >>> > > See this line above? It says that kdebase-meta-3.5.6 requires kate-3.5.6 > but that can't be fulfilled because you masked it. > > I see two viable options: > > 1. Put up with it and use vi instead (this is the recommended one...) > 2. Make your own local copy of kdebase-meta-3.5.6.ebuild and put it in > your overlay. Modify the ebuild the use any kdelibs and kate > 3.5.5, > this should satisfy the dependedcies. > > The other option is to downgrade all of kde to 3.5.5 but that's just > overkill :-) > > > alan > > Well, I like nano better but not if I can use something GUI. ;-) That option is not exactly what I am hoping to use. I don't understand portage and ebuilds well enough to do that. How about this. Is there a way to just tell emerge to emerge each separate package and get rid of kde-meta? I don't know, equery list kde then poke them in one by one. Would that let it leave kate and kdelibs where it is without masking all of kde? Thanks for the reply though. At least I can open the file and read it and it is not just me having this problem. Dale :-) :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/dalek1967
