Re: [gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan
Roeleveld [17-01-28 08:12]:
> On Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:43:14 AM CET meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there
> > actually...
> >
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> > ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,p
> > ython_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_pyth
> > on3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-pyth
> > on_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_sin
> > gle_target_python3_5(-)]". (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild]) (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "@selected" [set])
> > (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> >
> > How can I get out of this?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Meino
>
>
> I would recommend a re-sync. That package and version exists on my system:
> [I] dev-python/six
> Available versions: 1.10.0{tbz2} {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3
> python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
> Installed versions: 1.10.0{tbz2}(09:05:31 AM 11/04/2016)(-doc -test
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_5")
> Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six https://
> pypi.python.org/pypi/six
> Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library
>
> And I sync'd yesterday.
>
> --
> Joost
>
does not help...same as before...
Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:43:14 AM CET meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there
> actually...
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,p
> ython_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_pyth
> on3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-pyth
> on_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_sin
> gle_target_python3_5(-)]". (dependency required by
> "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild]) (dependency required by
> "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "@selected" [set])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
>
> How can I get out of this?
>
> Cheers
> Meino
I would recommend a re-sync. That package and version exists on my system:
[I] dev-python/six
Available versions: 1.10.0{tbz2} {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3
python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
Installed versions: 1.10.0{tbz2}(09:05:31 AM 11/04/2016)(-doc -test
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_5")
Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six https://
pypi.python.org/pypi/six
Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library
And I sync'd yesterday.
--
Joost
[gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan
Hi, I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there actually... emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-)]". (dependency required by "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by "@selected" [set]) (dependency required by "@world" [argument]) How can I get out of this? Cheers Meino
[gentoo-user] Re: Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox
On 01/27/2017 06:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote: Hi fellow gentoo'ers, I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio. Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse. If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the front speakers. But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound is mainly coming through the rear speakers. Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks! Run alsamixer (media-sound/alsa-utils). Press F6, select the Xonar and look for a "Stereo Upmix" setting. Also, make sure you're using the "Virtuoso" kernel driver (SND_VIRTUOSO), not the C-Media "Oxygen" one (SND_OXYGEN). The Virtuoso driver should provide the correct mixer controls for Xonar cards. (The Oxygen driver works too, since the Xonar cards use the Oxygen chip, but it might not provide Xonar-specific mixer controls.)
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 07:49:13 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
> >
> > wrote:
> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> more robust.
> >>>
> >>> rEFIt or rEFInd?
> >>
> >> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
> >>
> >> BillK
> >
> > Where did you install rEFInd? In the EFI partition? I am about to
> > install
> > gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3
> > partitions installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary.
> >
> > I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are
> > some parallels with boot loaders at least. I am thinking of trying out
> > the sys- boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd. Will it be
> > able to launch the OSX boot64.efi?
>
> mounted at /boot/efi
>
> /boot
> └── efi
> └── EFI
> ├── Boot
> ├── gentoo
> ├── Microsoft
> │ ├── Boot
> │ │ ├── ar-SA
> snip
> │ └── Recovery
> ├── refind
> │ ├── banners
> │ ├── drivers_x64
> │ ├── fonts
> │ ├── icons
> │ │ ├── licenses
> │ │ └── svg
> │ ├── images
> │ ├── keys
> │ └── tools_x64
> └── tools
>
> bunyip ~ # fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1
> Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disklabel type: gpt
> Disk identifier: 8607528E-5D14-4725-BC44-F325B97B6736
>
> Device Start End Sectors Size Type
> /dev/nvme0n1p1 2048534527532480 260M EFI System
> /dev/nvme0n1p2534528796671262144 128M Microsoft reserved
> /dev/nvme0n1p3796672 251281407 250484736 119.5G Microsoft basic data
> /dev/nvme0n1p4 496185344 500117503 3932160 1.9G Windows recovery
> environment
> /dev/nvme0n1p5 251281408 276447231 2516582412G Linux swap
> /dev/nvme0n1p6 276447232 496185343 219738112 104.8G Linux filesystem
>
> Partition table entries are not in disk order.
>
> /boot/efi/EFI/refind/refind.conf
> timeout 2
> showtools shell, gdisk, memtest, mok_tool, windows_recovery, about,
> reboot, exit, firmware
> scanfor manual
> menuentry Linux-4.9.5-gentoo {
> icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
> volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
> loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.efi
> initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.img
> options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
> pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
> root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
> resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
> }
> menuentry Linux-4.9.4-gentoo {
> icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
> volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
> loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.efi
> initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.img
> options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
> pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
> root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
> resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
> }
> menuentry "Windows 10" {
> loader \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
> }
Thanks, I may have a go installing rEFInd or systemd-boot this weekend.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
> wrote:
I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
more robust.
>>>
>>> rEFIt or rEFInd?
>>
>> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
>>
>> BillK
>
> Where did you install rEFInd? In the EFI partition? I am about to install
> gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3
> partitions
> installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary.
>
> I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are some
> parallels with boot loaders at least. I am thinking of trying out the sys-
> boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd. Will it be able to launch
> the OSX boot64.efi?
>
mounted at /boot/efi
/boot
└── efi
└── EFI
├── Boot
├── gentoo
├── Microsoft
│ ├── Boot
│ │ ├── ar-SA
snip
│ └── Recovery
├── refind
│ ├── banners
│ ├── drivers_x64
│ ├── fonts
│ ├── icons
│ │ ├── licenses
│ │ └── svg
│ ├── images
│ ├── keys
│ └── tools_x64
└── tools
bunyip ~ # fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 8607528E-5D14-4725-BC44-F325B97B6736
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/nvme0n1p1 2048534527532480 260M EFI System
/dev/nvme0n1p2534528796671262144 128M Microsoft reserved
/dev/nvme0n1p3796672 251281407 250484736 119.5G Microsoft basic data
/dev/nvme0n1p4 496185344 500117503 3932160 1.9G Windows recovery
environment
/dev/nvme0n1p5 251281408 276447231 2516582412G Linux swap
/dev/nvme0n1p6 276447232 496185343 219738112 104.8G Linux filesystem
Partition table entries are not in disk order.
/boot/efi/EFI/refind/refind.conf
timeout 2
showtools shell, gdisk, memtest, mok_tool, windows_recovery, about,
reboot, exit, firmware
scanfor manual
menuentry Linux-4.9.5-gentoo {
icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.efi
initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.img
options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
}
menuentry Linux-4.9.4-gentoo {
icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.efi
initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.img
options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
}
menuentry "Windows 10" {
loader \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
}
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > >> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and > >> more robust. > > > > rEFIt or rEFInd? > > Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using. > > BillK Where did you install rEFInd? In the EFI partition? I am about to install gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3 partitions installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary. I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are some parallels with boot loaders at least. I am thinking of trying out the sys- boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd. Will it be able to launch the OSX boot64.efi? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: >> >> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and >> more robust. > > rEFIt or rEFInd? > Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using. BillK
Re: [gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:41:44 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: > Device Start End Sectors Size Type > /dev/sdc12048264191262144 128M EFI System > /dev/sdc2 526336 537233407 536707072 255.9G Linux filesystem > /dev/sdc3 264192526335262144 128M BIOS boot You don't have a BIOS boot partition on a UEFI system. They are for compatibility when using GPT disks with BIOS systems, and even hen you don't put anything on them. Just create an EFI System partition, formatted using FAT and mounted at /boot as the first partition, then divide the rest of the disk between /, /home swap as you see fit. -- Neil Bothwick Drink varnish and you'll have a lovely finish. pgpzElG0x3awt.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-user] cyrus-sasl and multiple berkdb segfault
Hello Guys,
On one of my gentoo servers i had dev-libs/cyrus-sasl installed for some
time. Users configured for sasl auth.
After last system update i found that 'sasldblistusers2' and other commands
broken:
# sasldblistusers2
Successful return: 0
Segmentation fault
# ldd `which sasldblistusers2`
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffcaa381000)
libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libsasl2.so.3 (0x7f4fbac9)
libdb-4.8.so => /usr/lib64/libdb-4.8.so (0x7f4fba91)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7f4fba577000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x7f4fba373000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f4fba157000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f4fbaeae000)
And finally i found that 2 different version of sys-libs/db installed:
# eix -I sys-libs/db
[I] sys-libs/db
Available versions:
(1)1.85-r3
(3)3.2.9_p2
(4.2) 4.2.52_p5-r1
(4.3) 4.3.29_p1-r1
(4.4) ~4.4.20_p4-r1
(4.5) 4.5.20_p2-r1
(4.6) 4.6.21_p4
(4.7) 4.7.25_p4
(4.8) 4.8.30-r2{tbz2}
(5.1) ~5.1.29-r1
(5.3) 5.3.28-r2{tbz2}
(6.0) ~6.0.35
(6.1) [M]~6.1.29
(6.2) [M]~6.2.23
{cxx doc examples java rpc tcl test ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32"
ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32" ELIBC="FreeBSD"}
Installed versions: 4.8.30-r2(4.8){tbz2}(03:50:39 AM 07/28/2016)(cxx
-doc -examples -java -tcl -test ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64"
ABI_S390="-32 -64" ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")
5.3.28-r2(5.3){tbz2}(04:57:46 PM 01/27/2017)(cxx -doc -examples -java -tcl
-test ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64"
ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")
Homepage:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database-technologies/berkeleydb/overview/index.html
Description: Oracle Berkeley DB
eix -I dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
[I] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
Available versions: (2) 2.1.26-r9{tbz2} ~2.1.26-r10
(~)2.1.26-r11{tbz2}
{authdaemond berkdb gdbm java kerberos ldapdb libressl mysql
openldap pam postgres sample selinux sqlite srp ssl static-libs urandom
ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32" ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32"
ELIBC="FreeBSD"}
Installed versions: 2.1.26-r11(2){tbz2}(05:29:23 PM
01/27/2017)(berkdb pam ssl urandom -authdaemond -gdbm -java -kerberos
-ldapdb -libressl -mysql -openldap -postgres -sample -selinux -sqlite -srp
-static-libs ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64"
ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")
I tried to unmerge sys-libs/db-5.3.28-r2 but i see another packages (perl
and some modules) already compiled against db-5.
Also i rebuild cyrus-sasl dut it did not help.
revdep-rebuild said 'Your system is consistent'.
Can anyone help me to fix cyrus-sasl?
Thanks.
--
*This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.
Re: [gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox
On January 27, 2017 5:26:15 PM GMT+01:00, Jochen Kirchner
wrote:
>
>
>On 01/27/2017 05:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote:
>>
>> Hi fellow gentoo'ers,
>>
>>
>> I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.
>>
>> Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard
>>
>> Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.
>>
>> If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through
>the
>> front speakers.
>>
>> But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the
>sound
>> is mainly coming through the rear speakers.
>>
>> Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Jochen
>>
>
>I'm running systemd if that matters!
>
>emerge --info
>http://pastebin.com/4C9AcGhs
>
>emerge -pv pulseaudio
>[ebuild R] media-sound/pulseaudio-9.0::gentoo USE="X alsa
>alsa-plugin asyncns caps gdbm glib gtk ipv6 orc ssl systemd tcpd udev
>webrtc-aec -bluetooth -dbus -doc -equalizer -gnome -jack (-libressl)
>-libsamplerate -lirc -native-headset (-neon) -ofono-headset (-oss) -qt4
>-realtime (-selinux) -sox (-system-wide) {-test} -xen -zeroconf"
>ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB
I don't think systemd matters in this case.
I would expect some config setting for 'normal' stereo sound forcing it to the
rear speakers.
--
Joost
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox
On 01/27/2017 05:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote:
>
> Hi fellow gentoo'ers,
>
>
> I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.
>
> Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard
>
> Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.
>
> If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the
> front speakers.
>
> But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound
> is mainly coming through the rear speakers.
>
> Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jochen
>
I'm running systemd if that matters!
emerge --info
http://pastebin.com/4C9AcGhs
emerge -pv pulseaudio
[ebuild R] media-sound/pulseaudio-9.0::gentoo USE="X alsa
alsa-plugin asyncns caps gdbm glib gtk ipv6 orc ssl systemd tcpd udev
webrtc-aec -bluetooth -dbus -doc -equalizer -gnome -jack (-libressl)
-libsamplerate -lirc -native-headset (-neon) -ofono-headset (-oss) -qt4
-realtime (-selinux) -sox (-system-wide) {-test} -xen -zeroconf"
ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and > more robust. rEFIt or rEFInd?
Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Alan Grimes wrote: > I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first > impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently > some users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size > problem but the project has been deaf to these problems and has done > nothing whatsoever. =( That's grub1 (which doesn't understand efi). grub2 is still being developed. > I thought maybe I could go simple and use something like elilo. Unfortunately elilo's been abandoned.
[gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox
Hi fellow gentoo'ers, I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio. Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse. If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the front speakers. But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound is mainly coming through the rear speakers. Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks! Kind Regards, Jochen
Re: [gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!
Alan Grimes wrote: [] Had another learning experience with respect to how GPT disks work., system is buttoned up and operating in GPT mode. In old systems, the boot sectors and bootstrap loaders were kinda consigned to a digital pergatory on the drive, now you just have to give it its own 1mb partition... *sigh*. Oh well, at least I learned something from this ordeal... -- Strange Game. The only winning move is not to play. Powers are not rights.
[gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!
To make a boot disk in DOS you have two options. Format /s x: and Sys x: Once this is done, the new disk will boot perfectly [period] . So what I did was I deleted my botched UEFI partition, and created two new partitions, each of half-size. I mark ... well.: #33 localhost ~ # fdisk -l /dev/sdc Disk /dev/sdc: 256.2 GiB, 275064201216 bytes, 537234768 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk identifier: 00C7D602-412C-4505-8992-0482855EDEF9 Device Start End Sectors Size Type /dev/sdc12048264191262144 128M EFI System /dev/sdc2 526336 537233407 536707072 255.9G Linux filesystem /dev/sdc3 264192526335262144 128M BIOS boot Partition table entries are not in disk order. localhost ~ # I then set up my crap. on the BIOS boot partition, adjust the grub.cfg entries on that partition to expect to show up as hd0/sda[*] and try to boot the mofo... I got some BIOS errors regarding a boot failure, I'm not sure what that's about. =( I adjusted my d-ram voltage back to 1.475 which is what I think it needs to be... Have no idea, probably a red herring... After that, u know what happened? REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOOT LOOP! REBOO
[gentoo-user] julia against libgit2-0.25.1
Hello there, someone with problems on julia after upgrade libgit2 to
0.25.1 version?
Since them i'm facing a impossibility to upgrade packages. And yes,
julia was recompiled against new libgit2.
julia> Pkg.update()
INFO: Updating METADATA...
ERROR: METADATA cannot be updated. Resolve problems manually in
/home/rodolfo/.julia/v0.5/METADATA.
GitError(Code:ERROR, Class:Invalid, Invalid version 0 on git_proxy_options)
in macro expansion at ./libgit2/error.jl:99 [inlined]
in #fetch#52(::Base.LibGit2.FetchOptions, ::String, ::Function,
::Base.LibGit2.GitRemote, ::Array{AbstractString,1}) at
./libgit2/remote.jl:70
in (::Base.LibGit2.#kw##fetch)(::Array{Any,1}, ::Base.LibGit2.#fetch,
::Base.LibGit2.GitRemote, ::Array{AbstractString,1}) at ./:0
in #fetch#93(::String, ::String, ::Array{AbstractString,1},
::Nullable{Base.LibGit2.AbstractCredentials}, ::Function,
::Base.LibGit2.GitRepo) at ./libgit2/libgit2.jl:164
in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68
in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68
Any help are welcome. Best regards.
Re: [gentoo-user] snafu: the update
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Alan Grimes wrote: > Tom H wrote: >> AFAIK, when you load the kernel directly from the EFI firmware, it has >> to have the ".efi" suffix. But that doesn't explain why it would stall >> when loaded from grub... >> >> Somewhat OT: Regarding grub, your "/boot/" is messy. It might not be >> making a difference for (efi)-grub2's functioning but you have grub1 >> files (*stage1_5), grub2 bios files (i386-pc/), as well as grub2 efi >> files (x86_64-efi/). > > Yeah, I've been using that directory for many many long years, I ended > up removing the grub directory completely and re-installing, it's much > cleaner now. ACK. I just thought that I'd point it out. > I think there's something with how I'm compiling the kernel and the EFI > boot requirements aren't quite being met and the loader is trying to > execute non-code or some other error of that general nature. But that's > just a brainstorm, I really hate it when my machine gives me this kind > of problem where I don't even have an error message. If you're loading the kernel from grub, you don't have to compile the efi stub/stuff into the kernel. > FROM GRUB.CFG # > > echo 'Loading Linux 4.6.7 ...' > it successfully executes this line > linux /vmlinuz-4.6.7 root=/dev/sda2 ro > but fails before the first output from the kernel > > Looking at your grub.cfg, I wonder whether "linux /vmlinuz-4.6.7 ..." is correct. Looking at your original "tree" output, it looks like you're mounting the ESP at "/boot" and that grub's being loaded from "/boot/EFI/gentoo/grubx64.efi". What are the grub.cfg lines that start with "search" and "set root"?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What has happened to the Gentoo tree?
On 01/27/2017 12:11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 01/27/2017 11:56 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Thanks Mick, thanks Neil, it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed it and installed again. This fixed the issue. Or you forgot to run eix-update after doing emerge --sync? I don't think so, since I have been using eix-sync for ages.
[gentoo-user] Re: What has happened to the Gentoo tree?
On 01/27/2017 11:56 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Thanks Mick, thanks Neil, it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed it and installed again. This fixed the issue. Or you forgot to run eix-update after doing emerge --sync?
Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with gdbus-codegen
On Thursday 26 January 2017 22:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/01/2017 17:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
> >
> > Alan McKinnon wrote :
> >> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
> >> emerge give a different result?
> >
> > peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
> > Calculating dependencies ... done!
> >
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=gdbus-codegen-2.50.2".
> > peak ~ # eix -e gdbus-codegen
> > [I] dev-util/gdbus-codegen
> >
> > Available versions: 2.44.1 2.46.2 2.48.2 (~)2.50.0 (~)2.50.1
> > (~)2.50.2 {PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"} Installed
> > versions: 2.50.2(18:06:24 10/01/17)(PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7
> > python3_4 -python3_5") Homepage:http://www.gtk.org/
> > Description: GDBus code and documentation generator
> >
> > Something's screwed up here. I ran eclean-dist this morning and it listed
> > 90-odd packages with versions not in the database, which was not true.
> > Running eix-update again made no difference.
> >
> > I'm considering building a new system, but amd64 instead of ~amd64. I only
> > set the latter when this was a new box and too many packages needed to be
> > the ~ versions to be manageable otherwise.
> Somethng has gone wrong with your installation of portage or your copy
> of the tree - that "no ebuilds" message is impossible.
>
> It will probably be a cruel task to track down exactly what is wrong, my
> intuition says something in a local cache somewhere. Might be easiest
> just to delete all portage data (*except* /var/db/pkg), download a new
> tree tarball and let portage sort itself out
No clue if it's related or not, but I thought I'd mention this anyway:
This reminds me of a vaguely similar problem I had this week, though luckily
it was time-variant: portage refused to update boost-build because it was
masked, but the reason given was... literally empty. Immediately retrying it
on my desktop worked, but on my laptop it took a few retries (*no* changes in-
between) for portage to offer the upgrade. (Actually, for $reasons, I wanted
to do --fetchonly first, which took a few retries, then do the upgrade proper,
which took several more tries before the error went away again.)
Naturally, I haven't had any problems since...
Greetings
--
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] java replacement
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:15:42 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Some people think they can sell anything to everyone and then there is > > Alan and me. You to Neil. ROFL > > It also helps if you know multiple languages and can switch between > them at will. I once had a call from someone wanting to sell me > something. The conversation kept switching to different languages and > the person kept asking me to repeat what I said. I would simply repeat > the same, but in a different language. If only I'd be fluent in > Klingon ;) You don't have to be fluent, as long as the caller isn't ;-) I recently had a conversation along the lines of Caller: Would you like a free quote for a conservatory? Me: Ooh yes, I'd really like a conservatory... Caller: Me: ... but I'm not sure the people in the flat downstairs would be too happy about it Caller: -- Neil Bothwick Windows Error #10: Insufficient money spent in hardware. pgpHJh6VgzBcn.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] What has happened to the Gentoo tree?
Thanks Mick, thanks Neil, it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed it and installed again. This fixed the issue. Helmut
Re: [gentoo-user] java replacement
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:14:15 PM CET Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 26/01/2017 03:52, Dale wrote: > >> taii...@gmx.com wrote: > >>> On 01/25/2017 05:03 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > The java 8u112 download that the latest oracle java pulls in requires > an > invasive questionnaire to create an Oracle account to enable the > download. > > I was using iced-tea at one stage but found the android sdk didn’t work > well with it - is there a less objectionable java source than oracle > that has a compatible java? > > BillK > >>> > >>> "Why does radio-shack ask for your phone number why you buy batteries!" > >>> > >>> Always good to not put up with this crap, I like to feed them > >>> obviously fake information when I need something from a place that > >>> insists on doing this. > >>> > >>> I purchased some hardware (at a physical store with cash none the > >>> less) recently and the cashier asked for my information and was > >>> annoyingly insistent[1] so I gave them "John Smith at 123 1st Street" > >>> as she audibly sucked her teeth. > >>> > >>> The more people put up with this stuff the more bad things will happen > >>> - two police officers recently were murdered in france because a > >>> terrorist got their address off the internet and paid them a visit. > >>> > >>> [1]I presume they get a bonus for how many marketing > >>> emails/information they collect. > >> > >> It's also good to have a email address that you rarely if ever check. I > >> have one with the words spam, junk and such in it. I like the looks I > >> get when I give it to them. Generally, they not happy. Thing is, if I > >> need to confirm something, I can login and confirm it. It is a valid > >> email addy, I just rarely check it. > >> > >> It's odd just how much info they want just so we can be a customer. > >> Some act like we owe them something. > > > > If you own your own domain and sign up for say a bank account at > > Citibank, give your address as > > > > i.have.just.been.spammed.by.citib...@mckinnon.za.net > > > > and you will never see spam from that institution :-) > > I have it on good authority (from friends working there) that local > > banks etc "grep -v" anything that remotely matches their own name or > > domain when selling^Wsharing lists with spammers^Wpartners... > > > > > > Now if I can just get my own employer to get it too. Got another of > > these phone calls today: > > > > Them: Hi Alan! I'm calling from XYZ mobile network to offer you a great > > deal!! > > Me: I work for XYZ mobile network > > Them: Oh. Our special has great call rates! > > Me: All my calls are free > > Them: You get a great phone at a great discount...! > > Me: I have a top-flight company phone as a tool of trade, plus a > > notebook, plus a modem plus 2 x 24" hires screens > > Them: E ... how about a great deal for you wife? > > Me: The company gives me a second SIM for my spouse, same benefits > > > > Srsly, that happened. And some people have no idea when they are driving > > down Hopeless Street :-) > > I don't have a website but I hope others see that post and give it a > try. I wish we could see results for some of that, statistical of course. > > It reminds me of a time I won a TV. I would have to go get it and it > was a day, maybe two, drive away from me. The gas alone would cost more > than the TV would. Plus I'd need at least one nights hotel. To finally > end the nonsense I told the guy where to put his TV, sideways, not that > it mattered much back then. > > Some people think they can sell anything to everyone and then there is > Alan and me. You to Neil. ROFL It also helps if you know multiple languages and can switch between them at will. I once had a call from someone wanting to sell me something. The conversation kept switching to different languages and the person kept asking me to repeat what I said. I would simply repeat the same, but in a different language. If only I'd be fluent in Klingon ;) I can keep that up for an hour easily. -- Joost
