[gentoo-user] Cannot unsubscribe

2006-10-08 Thread Ed Jabbour
I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which bounced with a 
notice:"_Recipient_address_rejected:_User_unknown_in_local_recipient_table".  
Consequently, I'm still getting list mail.  Not sure anyone here with a clue 
for the clueless, but if so . . . . 

Thanks.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] CD trouble - can't read linux discs.

2006-08-04 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Fri August 4 2006 18:29, dg wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 01:20, Ed Jabbour wrote:
> > Both Desktop and laptop run gentoo.  Desk will boot or mount a knoppix
> > or other live cd.  Lap, however, will do neither - mount returns "bad
> > superblock."  The lap, strangely enough, will mount and read a Scrabble
> > disc for Windoze.  Same with file -s; reads Scrabble fine, but barfs on
> > the knoppix.  Any hints or pointers on where on the lap's gentoo system
> > to look for the difference in behaviour greatly appreciated.  Thanks.
>
> Can you read (without mounting) knoppix cd on the laptop with something
> like dd if= of=/dev/null ?

No.  But it's getting weird.  I tried mounting a straight data disc - the 
gentoo package one - and it mounted fine.  So, I thought maybe the problem 
was just with bootable discs.  Trying file -s, the system froze.  I 
rebooted.  Now, I have no /dev/hdc at all and lost /dev/dsp, too.  So, 
something's wrong with udev.  It seems my entire system is crumbling.  I'd 
commit the heresy of reinstalling if I could boot off a CD.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Gentoo penguins found eating apples.

2006-03-07 Thread Ed Jabbour
From: http://www.neoseeker.com/news/story/5381/

Linux Boots on Intel-Based Mac
Matt Horne - Thursday, February 16th, 2006 | 2:31PM (PST)

Gentoo successfully run on 17" iMac Core Duo

With the recent surge to find alternative means of OS software for your 
computer and electronic devices, the great minds over at Mactel-Linux have 
been successful in booting a version of Linux on the new Intel-based 17" 
iMac.

The modified Linux kernel has been successfully run from a USB-based hard 
drive and loads the Gentoo distro. More information from the group will be 
released this weekend.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Phantom libcap?

2005-10-07 Thread Ed Jabbour
emerge -uDvp world listed net-libs/libcap as upgrading from 0.8.3-r1 to 
0.9.3.  However, the Gentoo database has no such animal, but rather 
sys-libs/libcap.  Locally, eix libcap also lists only 
sys-libs/libcap-1.10-r5.  The net-libs "version" is not 
in /usr/portage/net-libs.  There just doesn't appear to be a 
net-libs/libcap, even though emerge shows an installed version.  Any advice 
appreciated.  Thanks.

-- 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot vs emerge --uDvp differences

2005-09-12 Thread Ed Jabbour
emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-lang/python-2.3.5-r2", as directed in 
the GLSA, returns a download for xemacs, which I do not now or ever had 
installed.  It is not in use flags.  However, an emerge -uDvp python doesn't 
even mention xemacs.  Any clue as to why the difference?  Any problems if 
the --oneshot is not used?  Thanks.

-- 
Ed Jabbour
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 & disk access

2005-08-22 Thread Ed Jabbour
I installed KDE 3.4.1 using the split ebuilds.  At the kdm login screen, 
there is no disk activity.  When logged in, however, no matter which user, 
the disk is constantly being accessed.  top shows no unusual activity - not 
to my eyes, anyway.  If I log into KDE 3.3, the disk is quiet.  How might I 
discover what is running to cause the disk access?  Thanks.

-- 
Ed Jabbour
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] xine cannot find /dev/hdc

2005-08-20 Thread Ed Jabbour
After a recent emerge -uDv system, which upgraded xine-lib, I cannot use xine 
to watch dvds anymore.  It cannot find /dev/hdc.  The output from running 
xine from the console is at http://rafb.net/paste/results/ac0MJP75.html.   
I've tried downgrading and re-emerging to no avail.  I'm wondering if this 
is related somehow to udev, but I don't know where to look for that.  Any 
advice appreciated.  Thanks.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Help I have b0rked my system :(

2005-07-07 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Thursday 07 July 2005 01:57 pm, Dave S wrote:
> Ed Jabbour wrote:

> >If you emerged the nvidia stuff, you got the newest versions.   Do you
> > have the RIVA TNT2 by any chance?  If so, portage now has 1.0.7664,
> > which acc/to NVidia is not compatible with the TNT2.  I use 7174, which
> > works fine.  This would explain why nv works, but nvidia doesn't, and
> > also why your X used to work, but doesn't now.

> Strangley my video card is a RIVA TNT2 :)
>
> I checked Nvidias website, apparently TNT2 is OK with *1.0-7667 so I
> will give it a go.
>
> Thanks for the tip, I will let you know how it goes

The following is from the 1.0-7667/README.txt:
=
Below are the legacy GPUs that are no longer supported in the unified driver.
These GPUs will continue to be maintained through the special legacy NVIDIA
GPU driver releases.

NVIDIA chip name   Device PCI ID
------
RIVA TNT   0x0020
RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro 0x0028
RIVA TNT2 Ultra0x0029
===

The same list is in the 7664 Readme.txt.  The 7174 lists TNT2 as supported.  
  So it goes.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Help I have b0rked my system :(

2005-07-07 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Thursday 07 July 2005 02:40 am, Dave S wrote:

> >...what about xcompmanager (or whatever it's called)? Is that possibly
> >running?
> >
> >Holly
>
> You could be right, Im going out to work now but I tried changing
> 'nvidia' to 'nv' in xorg.conf and everyting returned to normal, I
> re-emerged nvidia-glx + nvidia-kernel, re-booted, re-tryed 'nvidia' and
> wierdness returned.
>
> Haven't got any more time but will look at it this evening ...

If you emerged the nvidia stuff, you got the newest versions.   Do you have 
the RIVA TNT2 by any chance?  If so, portage now has 1.0.7664, which acc/to 
NVidia is not compatible with the TNT2.  I use 7174, which works fine.  This 
would explain why nv works, but nvidia doesn't, and also why your X used to 
work, but doesn't now.

--
Ed Jabbour
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] BaseLayout Shutdown not working

2005-06-26 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Sunday 26 June 2005 11:52 am, Robert Robinson wrote:
> On 6/26/05, Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Robert Robinson wrote:
> > > So I think I slightly screwed up updating the files in /etc after
> > > emerging the baselayout, because the box now doesn't shutdown, just
> > > kills the processes and then says system is halted.  Doesn't attempt
> > > to stop the init.d scripts, or power down the machine like it used to.

> Well, I don't even have that installed, and don't eremember ever
> having to install it to get it to work in the first place.

Perhaps you have apmd then?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] NFS problems - Linux & OSX

2005-06-13 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Monday 13 June 2005 03:36 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:09:53 -0400, Ed Jabbour wrote:
> > showmount -e 192.168.1.20 (server):
> > Export list for 192.168.1.20:
> > /Volumes/Alien 192.168.0.0
>
> It looks like you have exported the directory for the wrong network
> block.

Yes, that was it.  Should be 192.168.1.0.  I changed it and everything works.  
Thanks a lot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] NFS problems - Linux & OSX

2005-06-12 Thread Ed Jabbour
Mac OSX is the server - 192.168.1.20;  Linux the client - 192.168.1.4. 
When I "mount -o vers=2 192.168.1.20:/Volumes/Alien /mnt/alien" I get
the dreaded "mount: 192.168.1.20:/Volumes/Alien failed, reason given by
server: Permission denied".  I'm trying to discover which side the
problem's on.  Any of the following stuff not kosher?  

/etc/fstab:
192.168.1.20:/Volumes/Alien /mnt/alien nfs 
rw,noauto,users,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0

cat /proc/filesystems:
nodev   nfs
nodev   rpc_pipefs

kernel (gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r4):
grep NFS /usr/src/linux/.config
CONFIG_NFS_FS=m
CONFIG_NFS_V3=y
# CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set
# CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO is not set
CONFIG_NFSD=m
CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y
# CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is not set
CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y

showmount -e 192.168.1.20 (server):
Export list for 192.168.1.20:
/Volumes/Alien 192.168.0.0

rpcinfo - p (client):
program vers proto   port
102   tcp111  portmapper
102   udp111  portmapper
1000241   udp   1024  status
1000241   tcp   1024  status
151   udp976  mountd
151   tcp979  mountd
152   udp976  mountd
152   tcp979  mountd
153   udp976  mountd
153   tcp979  mountd

rpcinfo -p 192.168.1.20 (server):
program vers proto   port
102   tcp111  portmapper
102   udp111  portmapper
1000241   udp   1021  status
1000241   tcp   1015  status
1000210   udp   1008  nlockmgr
1000211   udp   1008  nlockmgr
1000213   udp   1008  nlockmgr
1000214   udp   1008  nlockmgr
1000210   tcp   1014  nlockmgr
1000211   tcp   1014  nlockmgr
1000213   tcp   1014  nlockmgr
1000214   tcp   1014  nlockmgr
132   udp   2049  nfs
133   udp   2049  nfs
132   tcp   2049  nfs
133   tcp   2049  nfs
151   udp966  mountd
153   udp966  mountd
151   tcp999  mountd
153   tcp999  mountd

id edj (on client):
uid=1000(edj) gid=100(users) groups=100(users)

id edj (on server):
uid=1000(edj) gid=100 groups=100

Any pointers, hints, where else to look, etc. greatly appreciated.  Thanks.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Why are these modules loading?

2005-06-12 Thread Ed Jabbour
I have ieee1394 stuff compiled in the kernel as modules:

[Sun Jun 12] edj:~$ grep 1394 /usr/src/linux/.config
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
CONFIG_IEEE1394=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_CMP=m

At boot, pcilynx, raw1394, ohci1394 & ieee1394 are all loaded.  So are 
i2c_algo_bit & i2c_core, both used by pcilynx.  None of the above is 
in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6.  Where are they being loaded from?  
Thanks.

-- 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] WMP v.9 files

2005-06-05 Thread Ed Jabbour
If anyone can play the videos at 

http://www.cmt.com/artists/az/carter_family/artist.jhtml

I's appreciate hearing what player you used.  Thanks.

-- 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Wireless: dhcpcd starts too early

2005-04-17 Thread Ed Jabbour
At boot, when wlan0 starts up, I get a msg that dhcpcd is already running, so 
- no connection.  I have to start it manually after rm'ing the pid file.  
I've run rc-update del on pcmcia, netmount. net.lo and hotplug.  Anyone w/ a 
notion what's starting up dhcpcd before net.wlan0 gets called?  Thanks.
-- 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] dma is off

2005-04-17 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Sunday 17 April 2005 07:17 am, Christoph Gysin wrote:
> Al Bayrouni wrote:
> > Here is the output of lspci:
> > -
> > :00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS 645xx
> > (rev 51)
>
> Ok, you have a SiS 645...
>
> > and the part of dmesg output:
> > ---
> > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
>
> ...but are using the generic IDE driver.
>
> Enable CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIS5513 in your kernel config to support your
> hardware.
>
> Device Drivers  --->
>ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support  --->
>   [*] SiS5513 chipset support

I have the VIA chipset, and " CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y" in the kernel.  
Should I be worried that lspci lists "Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver 
Revision: 7.00alpha2"?  DMA works.  Thanks.

-- 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] VT Switching doesn't work (Ctrl-Alt-F1)

2005-04-10 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Saturday 09 April 2005 07:41 pm, Francis Barton wrote:
> Hi there
> Using GNOME 2.8 with xorg 6.8.2-r1.
> Since I re-installed a couple of months ago I have not been able to
> switch out of X to my virtual terminals using Ctrl-Alt-F$n
>
> If I press Ctrl-Alt-F1 simply nothing happens.

Have you checked /etc/inittab?  You would uncomment however many terminals 
you want:

# TERMINALS
c1:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty 38400 tty1 linux
c2:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty 38400 tty2 linux
c3:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty 38400 tty3 linux

etc.

-- 
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Migrating Win4Lin

2005-04-09 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:24 pm, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but what is this W4L where you say I should ask?
> I could not locate a mailing list or forum of that name.


http://www.netraverse.com/support/maillists.php

> ++ kevin
>
> On Apr 4, 2005 12:51 PM, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You didn't say gentoo & W4L versions, but I'll bet good money that the
> > W4L you have may need kernel-2.4...
> > Thus if you're running k26 you'll probably need to upgrade the W4L.
> >
> > In either case, I'm sure that teh best thing that you can do is to ask
> > this on W4L -- Gour among others use W4L under Gentoo, so there *will*
> > be good help there.
> >
> > Luck!,
> > rgh.
> >
> > Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > >I have and old Win4Lin on an ancient RedHat 7.1 box, and want to
> > >retire that machine.
> > >I want to keep running Win4Lin, though, and I'm looking to migrate it
> > >to my Gentoo
> > >system with the Win4Lin kernel.  Is there anything special I have to
> > >look out for?
> > >It's been running so long I've forgotten everything I ever knew about
> > >the (binary?)
> > >licence file(s), configuration and so on.
> > >
> > >++ kevin
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo source kernels

2005-04-08 Thread Ed Jabbour
On Friday 08 April 2005 12:53 am, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> Had this on 3 systems this morning: change the /etc/make.profile link to
> point to 2005.0  Note that 2005.0 has a 2.4 subdirectory that locks you
> into the 2.4 stuff if make.profile symlinks to it instead of one level
> up.

There is /etc/make.profile.2005 which points to 2005.0, as well as a 
make.profile pointing to 2004.3.  I thought that took care of things - but 
perhaps not.  Besides, Daniel Drake's explanation is that Gentoo's site uses 
a 2.4 profile, not my machine.

>
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 22:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Ed Jabbour wrote:
> > > I am running gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.11-r4.  As announced,
> > > gentoo-dev-sources has disappeared from sys/kernel leaving
> > > gentoo-sources.  However, the Online Database lists 2.4.28-r8 as the
> > > latest stable build.  I just ran emerge uDvp world and I am offered 
> > > "NS   ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r5", which is marked M+ in
> > > the database.  I do not have any kernel in any /etc/portage files.  Is
> > > the database not up to date or is something wrong at my end?  Any
> > > advice appreciated.  Thanks.
> >
> > This is a bug in packages.gentoo.org. Well, strictly not a bug.
> > packages.gentoo.org runs on a 2.4 kernel, and therefore uses a 2.4
> > profile. As you might expect, all 2.6 kernels are hardmasked under the
> > 2.4 profile. An unfortunate side effect is that this is reflected in the
> > content published on the site.
> >
> > I asked the maintainer if he could do anything to resolve this - i.e.
> > change profile or refine the parsing. I didn't recieve a very positive
> > answer.
> >
> > But this does raise other questions, particularly as we can now have
> > much finer control over masking now that we have decent cascading
> > profiles. If there was a 2.7/2.8 tree out, we'd have another profile
> > tree for it, and we'd add masks in the other profiles accordingly to
> > make sure 2.7/2.8 was not available in other profiles. Which kernels
> > would packages.gentoo.org then show as masked..?
> >
> > Maybe more information (such as the profile enforcing the mask) will be
> > available in the new version of the site which will hopefully go online
> > soon.
> >
> > Daniel
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Gentoo source kernels

2005-04-07 Thread Ed Jabbour
I am running gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.11-r4.  As announced, gentoo-dev-sources 
has disappeared from sys/kernel leaving gentoo-sources.  However, the Online 
Database lists 2.4.28-r8 as the latest stable build.  I just ran emerge uDvp 
world and I am offered  "NS   ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r5", which 
is marked M+ in the database.  I do not have any kernel in any /etc/portage 
files.  Is the database not up to date or is something wrong at my end?  Any 
advice appreciated.  Thanks.

-- 
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list