Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Andrea Aime]

Ok, ready for review here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2048

Cheers
Andrea

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Jody Garnett  wrote:

> Thanks Kevin.
>
> I have updated https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153 with
> the table of responsibilities for each layer group mode.
>
> We could not come up with any good alternate wording, please proceed.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 3 January 2017 at 16:04, Kevin Smith  wrote:
>
>> On 17-01-03 10:30 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> > I agree both that "opaque container" is a bit ugly and potentially
>> > confusing and that "basemap" is too specific.  Maybe a "flat group"?
>>
>> Jody and I just talked this over and I withdraw "flat group". My new
>> suggestion is "Restricted Single" which isn't great but is consistent
>> with "single" meaning it does not show it's children while "trees" do.
>> Jody likes "Container" which again avoids "tree" although I dislike that
>> it is inconsistent with how "container" is used in "Container Tree"
>> because a container tree is not a named layer.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Michael Smith
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>>
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
>


-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Jody Garnett]

Thanks Kevin.

I have updated https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153 with
the table of responsibilities for each layer group mode.

We could not come up with any good alternate wording, please proceed.

--
Jody Garnett

On 3 January 2017 at 16:04, Kevin Smith  wrote:

> On 17-01-03 10:30 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > I agree both that "opaque container" is a bit ugly and potentially
> > confusing and that "basemap" is too specific.  Maybe a "flat group"?
>
> Jody and I just talked this over and I withdraw "flat group". My new
> suggestion is "Restricted Single" which isn't great but is consistent
> with "single" meaning it does not show it's children while "trees" do.
> Jody likes "Container" which again avoids "tree" although I dislike that
> it is inconsistent with how "container" is used in "Container Tree"
> because a container tree is not a named layer.
>
> --
> Kevin Michael Smith
> 
>
>
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Kevin Smith]

On 17-01-03 10:30 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> I agree both that "opaque container" is a bit ugly and potentially
> confusing and that "basemap" is too specific.  Maybe a "flat group"? 

Jody and I just talked this over and I withdraw "flat group". My new
suggestion is "Restricted Single" which isn't great but is consistent
with "single" meaning it does not show it's children while "trees" do. 
Jody likes "Container" which again avoids "tree" although I dislike that
it is inconsistent with how "container" is used in "Container Tree"
because a container tree is not a named layer.

-- 
Kevin Michael Smith





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Kevin Smith]

On 16-12-28 12:10 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Mike Pumphrey  > wrote:
>
> I know I'm non-voting, but I agree with Jody's point here. Also,
> to my mind, "opaque container" is better realized as "black box"
> (fewer syllables too).
>
> But I think "basemap" might get more to the heart of how it would
> be used.
>

> If I can share my non binding opinion (I honestly don't care much),
> basemap seems to be a bit specific,
> while it's a legit use case of the functionality, one could also have
> a group that cannot be broken up
> in component parts meant to be used as an overlay (thus, no basemap).
>
I agree both that "opaque container" is a bit ugly and potentially
confusing and that "basemap" is too specific.  Maybe a "flat group"? 

-- 
Kevin Michael Smith




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Andrea Aime]

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
wrote:

> Andrea,
>
> Jody and I brainstormed GSIP-153 in today's (very small) committee
> meeting. In a nutshell, have you considered a single layer group class with
> many properties, rather than multiple classes of layer group? Jody made a
> nice table and we listed the properties in bullet points. We also discussed
> some naming changes. Please see the meeting notes.
>

I'm quite baffled and disconcerted... some chronology:

   - December 15th, initial discussion on the concept.
   
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Proposing-a-new-layer-group-type-why-make-do-with-4-when-you-can-have-5-td5299963.html
   Only feedback from Ben, who agrees on the concept and suggest to write a
   proposal. I wait a few days for people to provide feedback to inform the
   proposal (to avoid rewriting it), no feedback, time to move on.
   - December 19th, proposal in, by Dec 23rd there are more than enough
   votes, and one trivial request for name change (no problem there)

Given the lack of objections on both the mail and the proposal I start the
implementation on Dec 21th, the implementation is now basically ready
(still have to debug and fix some kinks):
https://github.com/aaime/geoserver/tree/lg_opaque_container

By a quick glance over the discussion in the other mail it seems that
actually:

   - You did not bother reading the first mail, or did not understand it
   - You did not bother reading/understanding or discussing the proposal
   (you'd not have questions now otherwise)

So what are the +1 you casted on the proposal worth?
The proposal mechanism, when it works, provides several beneficial
guarantees:

   - The community has a say on what gets implemented
   - The community has insurance that the work is resources and will be
   completed
   - The implementers knows they won't have to redo the design of their
   work from the ground up once the proposal is voted

The community has been given two occasions to discuss and bend the
proposal, and none was exploited. I'll now try to have a look at it, but my
budget is gone in the existing implementation (still only have a bit to
handle review comments). Would it be wrong of me to expect not simply
discussion but also coding and documentation help from those that changed
their mind now?

I'd really urge everybody to think _before_ casting a vote, not after doing
so. If you are unsure, it's also ok to ask for some time to think, just say
so in public.
If this case is an exception, well, that happens, but if it becomes common,
the proposal mechanism is basically dead and done for.

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Mike Pumphrey]

I know I'm non-voting, but I agree with Jody's point here. Also, to my 
mind, "opaque container" is better realized as "black box" (fewer 
syllables too).

But I think "basemap" might get more to the heart of how it would be used.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Pumphrey
Education Program Director | Boundless
917-338-0407
m...@boundlessgeo.com
http://boundlessgeo.com
@boundlessgeo

On 12/22/2016 3:21 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Reading now, tripping up over the naming "*Opaque Container".*
>
> I usually think of the word opaque as the opposite of transparent.
>
> The main difference in our naming seems to between "single" and "tree".
> This new layer group type is behaving like a single layer, we just wish the
> contained layers were "nameless" and. It available for direct access.
>
> Could I suggest calling this my its purpose "basemap" or "single basemap".
>
> What is getting me here is what to call the layers that compose the
> "basemap" that are unlisted in the capabilities document. It feels like
> adding them to a "basemap" changes their default behaviour to unadvertised.
> Is this the case or am I reading the proposal wrong?
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM Andrea Aime 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
>> this proposal:
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>>
>> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
>> current layer groups,
>> in protected and non protected mode.
>>
>> Please vote/discuss
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> ==
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>>
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>
>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
>> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
>> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>>
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> --
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
>
>
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Ben Caradoc-Davies]

Andrea,

Jody and I brainstormed GSIP-153 in today's (very small) committee 
meeting. In a nutshell, have you considered a single layer group class 
with many properties, rather than multiple classes of layer group? Jody 
made a nice table and we listed the properties in bullet points. We also 
discussed some naming changes. Please see the meeting notes.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 23/12/16 12:21, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Reading now, tripping up over the naming "*Opaque Container".*
>
> I usually think of the word opaque as the opposite of transparent.
>
> The main difference in our naming seems to between "single" and "tree".
> This new layer group type is behaving like a single layer, we just wish the
> contained layers were "nameless" and. It available for direct access.
>
> Could I suggest calling this my its purpose "basemap" or "single basemap".
>
> What is getting me here is what to call the layers that compose the
> "basemap" that are unlisted in the capabilities document. It feels like
> adding them to a "basemap" changes their default behaviour to unadvertised.
> Is this the case or am I reading the proposal wrong?
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM Andrea Aime 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
>> this proposal:
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>>
>> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
>> current layer groups,
>> in protected and non protected mode.
>>
>> Please vote/discuss
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> ==
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>>
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>
>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
>> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
>> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>>
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> --
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
>
>
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Christian Mueller]

Added my +1 on the proposal

Cheers

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Jody Garnett 
wrote:

> +1 on the proposal
>
> "single basemap" is an alternate for "opaque container" if you are
> interested.
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:21 PM Jody Garnett 
> wrote:
>
>> Reading now, tripping up over the naming "*Opaque Container".*
>>
>> I usually think of the word opaque as the opposite of transparent.
>>
>> The main difference in our naming seems to between "single" and "tree".
>> This new layer group type is behaving like a single layer, we just wish the
>> contained layers were "nameless" and. It available for direct access.
>>
>> Could I suggest calling this my its purpose "basemap" or "single
>> basemap".
>>
>> What is getting me here is what to call the layers that compose the
>> "basemap" that are unlisted in the capabilities document. It feels like
>> adding them to a "basemap" changes their default behaviour to unadvertised.
>> Is this the case or am I reading the proposal wrong?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM Andrea Aime 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and
>>> wrote this proposal:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>>>
>>> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
>>> current layer groups,
>>> in protected and non protected mode.
>>>
>>> Please vote/discuss
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> --
>>> ==
>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>>> @geowolf
>>> Technical Lead
>>>
>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
>>> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>>>
>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>
>>> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>>
>>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
>>> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
>>> or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
>>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> --
>>>
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>
>>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__
>>> _
>>>
>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>
>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>>> --
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> 
> --
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
>


-- 
DI Christian Mueller MSc (GIS), MSc (IT-Security)
OSS Open Source Solutions GmbH

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Jody Garnett]

+1 on the proposal

"single basemap" is an alternate for "opaque container" if you are
interested.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:21 PM Jody Garnett  wrote:

> Reading now, tripping up over the naming "*Opaque Container".*
>
> I usually think of the word opaque as the opposite of transparent.
>
> The main difference in our naming seems to between "single" and "tree".
> This new layer group type is behaving like a single layer, we just wish the
> contained layers were "nameless" and. It available for direct access.
>
> Could I suggest calling this my its purpose "basemap" or "single basemap".
>
> What is getting me here is what to call the layers that compose the
> "basemap" that are unlisted in the capabilities document. It feels like
> adding them to a "basemap" changes their default behaviour to unadvertised.
> Is this the case or am I reading the proposal wrong?
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM Andrea Aime 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
>> this proposal:
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>>
>> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
>> current layer groups,
>> in protected and non protected mode.
>>
>> Please vote/discuss
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> ==
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>>
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>
>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
>> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
>> or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>>
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
-- 
--
Jody Garnett
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Jody Garnett]

Reading now, tripping up over the naming "*Opaque Container".*

I usually think of the word opaque as the opposite of transparent.

The main difference in our naming seems to between "single" and "tree".
This new layer group type is behaving like a single layer, we just wish the
contained layers were "nameless" and. It available for direct access.

Could I suggest calling this my its purpose "basemap" or "single basemap".

What is getting me here is what to call the layers that compose the
"basemap" that are unlisted in the capabilities document. It feels like
adding them to a "basemap" changes their default behaviour to unadvertised.
Is this the case or am I reading the proposal wrong?

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM Andrea Aime 
wrote:

> Hi,
> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
> this proposal:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>
> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
> current layer groups,
> in protected and non protected mode.
>
> Please vote/discuss
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39  339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
>
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
> --
--
Jody Garnett
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Kevin Smith]

On 2016-12-19 02:47 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and
> wrote this proposal:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>
> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
> current layer groups,
> in protected and non protected mode.
>
+1


-- 
Kevin Michael Smith





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Ben Caradoc-Davies]

+1.

On 19/12/16 23:47, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
> this proposal:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>
> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for current
> layer groups,
> in protected and non protected mode.
>
> Please vote/discuss
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
> ___
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Alessio Fabiani]

+1 for me too. I think it would be useful, considering also past email
threads on ml.

Best Regards,
Alessio Fabiani.

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39 331 6233686

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

-

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:

> +1,
> but I'd like to hear the others as well.
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchini
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
> @simogeo
> Founder/Director
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob:   +39 333 8128928
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> ---
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate.
> Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del
> messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora
> riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo
> cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla
> distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema.
> Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte,
> distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità
> diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal
> D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be
> confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of
> privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New
> Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any
> disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either
> dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except
> previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by
> telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message
> that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty
> or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent
> messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes made after they
> were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail
> transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrea Aime
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
> > this proposal:
> >
> > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
> >
> > As suggested by Ben I've 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Simone Giannecchini]

+1,
but I'd like to hear the others as well.

Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39  333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---
AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate.
Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del
messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora
riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo
cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla
distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema.
Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte,
distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità
diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal
D.Lgs. 196/2003.

The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be
confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of
privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New
Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any
disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either
dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except
previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by
telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message
that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty
or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent
messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes made after they
were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail
transmission, viruses, etc.


On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrea Aime
 wrote:
> Hi,
> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
> this proposal:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>
> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for current
> layer groups,
> in protected and non protected mode.
>
> Please vote/discuss
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39  339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i
> file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro
> utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le
> finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio
> senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia
> via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
> cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo
> anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per
> finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati
> dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does
> not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> ---
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Andrea Aime]

Ah hem... anyone? :-)

Cheers
Andrea

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrea Aime 
wrote:

> Hi,
> I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
> this proposal:
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153
>
> As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for
> current layer groups,
> in protected and non protected mode.
>
> Please vote/discuss
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>



-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi 

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP 153 - opaque container layer group mode

[Andrea Aime]

Hi,
I've follow up with the previous discussion on layer tree modes and wrote
this proposal:

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-153

As suggested by Ben I've summarized the existing group behavior for current
layer groups,
in protected and non protected mode.

Please vote/discuss

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel