Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-18 Thread Simon Marlow

Gregory Wright wrote:


I built ghc-6.10.1.20090314 on OS X 10.5.6 (Intel) using ghc 6.8.2 as
a bootstrap compiler.  The build was done using the MacPorts 
infrastructure.


Summary test results:

OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Tue Mar 17 15:31:38 EDT 2009
2334 total tests, which gave rise to
   12487 test cases, of which
   0 caused framework failures
2460 were skipped

9709 expected passes
 258 expected failures
   0 unexpected passes
  60 unexpected failures

Unexpected failures:
   2469(ghci)
   apirecomp001(normal)
   
bits(normal,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) 


   conc049(hpc)
   conc068(normal)
   derefnull(profc,profthreaded)
   divbyzero(profc,profthreaded)
   
genUpTo(normal,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) 


   length001(optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,threaded2,profthreaded)
   
num009(normal,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) 

   
num012(normal,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded) 


   signals002(ghci)
   signals004(ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)


Thanks.  We really need people to look at these failing tests and either 
fix them or submit tickets as necessary.  Volunteers?


For num009 and num012, I've turned these on as part of validate which will 
force the problems to the surface.


Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-18 Thread Thomas Schilling
There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the  
toplevel or within the tests directory.  Could you search for  
"apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test.  I  
can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though I'm  
on OS X, too.


On 18 Mar 2009, at 10:51, Gregory Wright wrote:



I built ghc-6.10.1.20090314 on OS X 10.5.6 (Intel) using ghc 6.8.2 as
a bootstrap compiler.  The build was done using the MacPorts  
infrastructure.


Summary test results:

OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Tue Mar 17 15:31:38 EDT 2009
   2334 total tests, which gave rise to
  12487 test cases, of which
  0 caused framework failures
   2460 were skipped

   9709 expected passes
258 expected failures
  0 unexpected passes
 60 unexpected failures

Unexpected failures:
  2469(ghci)
  apirecomp001(normal)
   
bits 
(normal 
,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)

  conc049(hpc)
  conc068(normal)
  derefnull(profc,profthreaded)
  divbyzero(profc,profthreaded)
   
genUpTo 
(normal 
,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)

  length001(optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,threaded2,profthreaded)
   
num009 
(normal 
,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
   
num012 
(normal 
,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)

  signals002(ghci)
  signals004(ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)


I haven't looked at the errors in detail, but generally the release  
candidate

seems OK.

BTW, a test target will be added to MacPorts's portfile for the  
6.10.2 release, which will

let you run the test suite by typing

> sudo port test ghc

and if you then install the tested build, a record of the test will  
be saved in

$PREFIX/share/ghc-/.

Best Wishes,
Greg

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


/ Thomas
--
Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.





PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-18 Thread Thorkil Naur
Hello Thomas,

On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:03, Thomas Schilling wrote:
> There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the  
> toplevel or within the tests directory.  Could you search for  
> "apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test.  I  
> can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though I'm  
> on OS X, too.

Several of the buildbot slaves fail the apirecomp001(normal) test as well. For 
eaxmple, here is the output from 

http://darcs.haskell.org/buildbot/all/builders/tnaur%20x86%20Linux%20head/builds/333/steps/runtestsuite/logs/unexpected

for that test:

=> apirecomp001(normal)
cd ./ghc-api/apirecomp001 && $MAKE -s --no-print-directory apirecomp001
apirecomp001.run.stdout 2>apirecomp001.run.stderr
Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 )
Stdout:

Stderr:
make[1]: myghc: Command not found
make[1]: *** [apirecomp001] Error 127

*** unexpected failure for apirecomp001(normal)

> 
> On 18 Mar 2009, at 10:51, Gregory Wright wrote:
> 
> >
> > I built ghc-6.10.1.20090314 on OS X 10.5.6 (Intel) using ghc 6.8.2 as
> > a bootstrap compiler.  The build was done using the MacPorts  
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > Summary test results:
> >
> > OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Tue Mar 17 15:31:38 EDT 2009
> >2334 total tests, which gave rise to
> >   12487 test cases, of which
> >   0 caused framework failures
> >2460 were skipped
> >
> >9709 expected passes
> > 258 expected failures
> >   0 unexpected passes
> >  60 unexpected failures
> >
> > Unexpected failures:
> >   2469(ghci)
> >   apirecomp001(normal)
> >
> > bits 
> > (normal 
> > ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >   conc049(hpc)
> >   conc068(normal)
> >   derefnull(profc,profthreaded)
> >   divbyzero(profc,profthreaded)
> >
> > genUpTo 
> > (normal 
> > ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >   length001(optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >
> > num009 
> > (normal 
> > ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >
> > num012 
> > (normal 
> > ,optc,hpc,optasm,profc,profasm,ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >   signals002(ghci)
> >   signals004(ghci,threaded1,threaded2,profthreaded)
> >
> >
> > I haven't looked at the errors in detail, but generally the release  
> > candidate
> > seems OK.
> >
> > BTW, a test target will be added to MacPorts's portfile for the  
> > 6.10.2 release, which will
> > let you run the test suite by typing
> >
> > > sudo port test ghc
> >
> > and if you then install the tested build, a record of the test will  
> > be saved in
> > $PREFIX/share/ghc-/.
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Greg
> >
> > ___
> > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
> 
> / Thomas
> --
> Push the envelope.  Watch it bend.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Best regards
Thorkil
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-18 Thread Gregory Wright


Hi Thomas,


On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Thomas Schilling wrote:

There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the  
toplevel or within the tests directory.  Could you search for  
"apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test.   
I can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though  
I'm on OS X, too.




I get:

> Running ./ghc-api/apirecomp001/all.T
=> apirecomp001(normal)cd ./ghc-api/apirecomp001 && $MAKE -s --no- 
print-directory apirecomp001apirecomp001.run.stdout  
2>apirecomp001.run.stderr

Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 )
Stdout:

Stderr:
ld warning: atom sorting error for  
_ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizutype_closure_tbl and  
_ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizucif_closure_tbl in /opt/local/ 
var/macports/build/_Users_gwright_src_macports-trunk_dports_lang_ghc- 
beta/work/ghc-6.10.1.20090314/compiler/dist-stage2/build/ 
libHSghc-6.10.1.20090314.a(LibFFI.o)
ld warning: atom sorting error for  
_ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizutype_closure_tbl and  
_ghczm6zi10zi1zi20090314_LibFFI_Czuffizucif_closure_tbl in /opt/local/ 
var/macports/build/_Users_gwright_src_macports-trunk_dports_lang_ghc- 
beta/work/ghc-6.10.1.20090314/compiler/dist-stage2/build/ 
libHSghc-6.10.1.20090314.a(LibFFI.o)

make[2]: myghc: Command not found
make[2]: *** [apirecomp001] Error 127
*** unexpected failure for apirecomp001(normal)


Best Wishes,
Greg

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-19 Thread Simon Marlow

Thorkil Naur wrote:

Hello Thomas,

On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:03, Thomas Schilling wrote:
There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the  
toplevel or within the tests directory.  Could you search for  
"apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test.  I  
can't reproduce this failure when running it manually even though I'm  
on OS X, too.


Several of the buildbot slaves fail the apirecomp001(normal) test as well. For 
eaxmple, here is the output from 


http://darcs.haskell.org/buildbot/all/builders/tnaur%20x86%20Linux%20head/builds/333/steps/runtestsuite/logs/unexpected

for that test:

=> apirecomp001(normal)
cd ./ghc-api/apirecomp001 && $MAKE -s --no-print-directory apirecomp001
apirecomp001.run.stdout 2>apirecomp001.run.stderr

Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 )
Stdout:

Stderr:
make[1]: myghc: Command not found
make[1]: *** [apirecomp001] Error 127


I suspect Thomas has "." in his PATH.  Naughty :-)

This fixes it:

-   @myghc $(TOP)/..
+   @./myghc $(TOP)/..

I'll validate and push.

Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-26 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:51:31AM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:
> 
> Unexpected failures:
>2469(ghci)

This is
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2789
(which is fixed in the new build system).

>apirecomp001(normal)

This is failing because of
"ld: atom sorting error for ..." on OS X
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2578
(I'd love for someone to fix that).

> bits 
> genUpTo 

These are fixed.

> num009 
> num012 

These still need to be fixed, but I'm pretty sure they aren't
regressions.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-27 Thread Simon Marlow

Ian Lynagh wrote:

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:51:31AM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:

Unexpected failures:
   2469(ghci)


This is
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2789
(which is fixed in the new build system).


   apirecomp001(normal)


This is failing because of
"ld: atom sorting error for ..." on OS X
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2578
(I'd love for someone to fix that).

bits 
genUpTo 


These are fixed.

num009 
num012 


These still need to be fixed, but I'm pretty sure they aren't
regressions.


I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know what's 
going on with num009.


Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-27 Thread Max Bolingbroke
2009/3/27 Simon Marlow :
> I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know what's
> going on with num009.

num009 has been broken on OS X for as long as I can remember :-). I
opened a ticket about it on Trac way back:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2370 (not that that ticket
has any useful information in it...)

Cheers,
Max
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Under OS X 10.5.6: GHC 6.10.1 Release Candidate 1

2009-03-27 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Max Bolingbroke  wrote:

> 2009/3/27 Simon Marlow :
> > I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know
> > what's going on with num009.
> 
> num009 has been broken on OS X for as long as I can remember :-).

If it is any help, I can confirm that num009 works correctly on a
PowerPC Mac with both ghc-6.8.2 and 6.10.1, but it fails on an Intel Mac
at least as far back as ghc-6.8.3.

Regards,
Malcolm
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users