Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2013-01-22 Thread Arvind Kannan
For the benefit of anyone who happens to be Googling the same problem, the 
following lines inserted into the aminoacids.hdb file will tell pdb2gmx how to 
correctly protonate the heme.

HEME16
1   1   HA  CHA C1A C4D
1   1   HB  CHB C4A C1B
1   1   HC  CHC C4B C1C
1   1   HD  CHD C4C C1D
3   4   HMA CMA C3A C4A
2   6   HAA CAA CBA C2A
2   6   HBA CBA CGA CAA
3   4   HMB CMB C2B C1B
1   1   HAB CAB C3B CBB
2   3   HBB CBB CAB C3B
3   4   HMC CMC C2C C1C
1   1   HAC CAC C3C CBC
2   3   HBC CBC CAC C3C
3   4   HMD CMD C2D C1D
2   6   HAD CAD CBD C3D
2   6   HBD CBD CGD CAD

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-22 Thread Sundar Jubilant

 

 Dear Abraham,

Sorry for making it hard. Since I am so new to this I guess I am not explaining 
it clearly for you to help me.

First of all I dont want to ignore any hydrogens but as pdb2gmx was complaining 
about my system and suggested me to add -ignh I did so.

My problem is how to update .hdb with heme hydrogen details.

So, here to follow your suggestion removing the hydrogen atoms I wish to ignore 
I actually need to ignore the hydorgens in protein.

Thanks
Sundar

 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 8:08 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 9:02 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:
  
 
  
  
 Dear Abraham,
  
  How would it work if I remove the hydrogen atoms that I   
   wish to ignore from my input co-ordinate file? The pdb2gmx  
tries to add the missing hydorgen atoms for which the .hdb  doesn't 
have information.



You've never actually told us what hydrogens you want to ignore, so
you're making it hard to help you.

Mark


  
  
  In my case here, I can consider heme as a ligand instead  
of having it as protein since it doesn't need to be the  part 
of the protein.
  
  Thanks for your information.
  Sundar
  
  
 
  
  
-OriginalMessage-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 6:42 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 7:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:  

 Dear Abraham,
  
  I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues  
since I am not sure if the Gromacs has an option
  to ignore hydrogen only for pretein residues but  not for 
the heme complexed with it.

  
  
  No, there is no ability to ignore them selectively - but  
if you want to ignore any of them, you have to address the  
heme hydrogen database issue, or go and remove the  hydrogen atoms 
that you wish to ignore from your input  coordinate file.
  
  

 
  One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme  
as an ligand not as a part of the protein to solve  
this issue. How would that really affect the  accuracy 
of the simulation?

  
  
  It's not a question of accuracy, but rather that if you   
   have bonded interactions between heme and protein, they  have to 
be part of the same [moleculetype], which is what  pdb2gmx is 
struggling to generate.
  
  Mark
  
  

 
  Thanks
  Sundar


 


 


-Original  Message-
  From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
  To: Discussion list for GROMACS users 
gmx-users@gromacs.org
  Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
  Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 
 FF
  
  
On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:   
 
  
 
  
  
 Dear Abraham,
  
  Thanks for your email. I have already 
 read the manual to solve the problem   
   but I wasn't successful.



That's good to say (particularly the first time 
   you post a request for help, else you'll just
get told to go and read), but is unlikely to get
much help because you haven't identified aspecific 
problem. You'd like the ability tobuild hydrogen atoms 
on a heme residue. pdb2gmxhas to have a specific recipe 
for doing

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-22 Thread Mark Abraham

On 23/04/2012 12:01 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

Sorry for making it hard. Since I am so new to this I guess I am not 
explaining it clearly for you to help me.


First of all I dont want to ignore any hydrogens but as pdb2gmx was 
complaining about my system and suggested me to add -ignh I did so.


Since that step introduces other problems, maybe the suggestion wasn't 
the best approach. Identifying the real problem may lead to a better 
solution than trouble-shooting an issue that arose from a suggested 
solution. There's a lesson here about describing the whole problem when 
seeking help, rather than just the immediate aspect. People who might 
help want all the information you can give them.




My problem is how to update .hdb with heme hydrogen details.

So, here to follow your suggestion removing the hydrogen atoms I wish 
to ignore I actually need to ignore the hydorgens in protein.


Maybe. Depends on the original problem. Chopping out just a subset of 
hydrogens with a text editor, leaving heme alone, solves a class of 
problems simply without needing to use the brute-force -ign and 
rebuild approach.


Mark



Thanks
Sundar

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 8:08 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 9:02 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

How would it work if I remove the hydrogen atoms that I wish to 
ignore from my input co-ordinate file? The pdb2gmx tries to add the 
missing hydorgen atoms for which the .hdb doesn't have information.


You've never actually told us what hydrogens you want to ignore, so 
you're making it hard to help you.


Mark



In my case here, I can consider heme as a ligand instead of having it 
as protein since it doesn't need to be the part of the protein.


Thanks for your information.
Sundar

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 6:42 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 7:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear Abraham,

I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues since I am not sure 
if the Gromacs has an option to ignore hydrogen only for pretein 
residues but not for the heme complexed with it.


No, there is no ability to ignore them selectively - but if you want 
to ignore any of them, you have to address the heme hydrogen database 
issue, or go and remove the hydrogen atoms that you wish to ignore 
from your input coordinate file.




One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme as an ligand not as 
a part of the protein to solve this issue. How would that really 
affect the accuracy of the simulation?


It's not a question of accuracy, but rather that if you have bonded 
interactions between heme and protein, they have to be part of the 
same [moleculetype], which is what pdb2gmx is struggling to generate.


Mark



Thanks
Sundar


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to solve the 
problem but I wasn't successful.


That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a request 
for help, else you'll just get told to go and read), but is unlikely 
to get much help because you haven't identified a specific problem. 
You'd like the ability to build hydrogen atoms on a heme residue. 
pdb2gmx has to have a specific recipe for doing that. The manual 
describes the required format and gives an example. Someone's going 
to have to do some work.




I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem.

By the way, here is the full command line for which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top -i 
CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh


If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already correct, you 
don't need to re-generate them...


Mark



The error is

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Sundar Jubilant

 

 Dear Abraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to solve the problem but 
I wasn't successful.

I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem. 

By the way, here is the full command line for which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top -i CYP_CHARMM.itp 
-ignh

The error is

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdbfile
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb   
 file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb   
 file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want
to use this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option-missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please   
 check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Thanks.

Sundar Jubilant


 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:
Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a 
   heme group using CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I havereceived 
the following error while running pdb2gmx .
  

When asking for help, please give your full command lines and/or
interactive selections so that we can know more context.



WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb   
 file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb   
 file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb   
 file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen
database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want
to use this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option-missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please   
 check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Can anyone help how can I generate and add hydrogen database
information for heme to be used with CHARMM27 ff?


  You'll have to read the applicable sections of manual chapter 
 5, make a local copy of the charmm27.ff folder in your working  
directory and editing aminoacids.hdb to add the generation  
information. When you're done, please post your efforts so  that others 
might be able to benefit from them in future.  (Also, search first in 
case this has already happened!)
  
  Mark
  
 
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search 
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Mark Abraham

On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to solve the 
problem but I wasn't successful.


That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a request for 
help, else you'll just get told to go and read), but is unlikely to get 
much help because you haven't identified a specific problem. You'd like 
the ability to build hydrogen atoms on a heme residue. pdb2gmx has to 
have a specific recipe for doing that. The manual describes the required 
format and gives an example. Someone's going to have to do some work.




I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem.

By the way, here is the full command line for which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top -i 
CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh


If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already correct, you don't 
need to re-generate them...


Mark



The error is

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Thanks.

Sundar Jubilant


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a heme 
group using CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the 
following error while running pdb2gmx .


When asking for help, please give your full command lines and/or 
interactive selections so that we can know more context.




WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Can anyone help how can I generate and add hydrogen database 
information for heme to be used with CHARMM27 ff?


You'll have to read the applicable sections of manual chapter 5, make 
a local copy of the charmm27.ff folder in your working directory and 
editing aminoacids.hdb to add the generation information. When you're 
done, please post your efforts so that others might be able to benefit 
from them in future. (Also, search first in case this has already 
happened!)


Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-us...@gromacs.org  mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive athttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it togmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org  
mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Readhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Sundar Jubilant

 Dear Abraham,

I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues since I am not sure if the 
Gromacs has an option to ignore hydrogen only for pretein residues but not for 
the heme complexed with it.

One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme as an ligand not as a part of 
the protein to solve this issue. How would that really affect the accuracy of 
the simulation?

Thanks
Sundar

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:
  
 
  
  
 Dear Abraham,
  
  Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to  
solve the problem but I wasn't successful.



That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a requestfor 
help, else you'll just get told to go and read), but is unlikelyto get much 
help because you haven't identified a specific problem.You'd like the 
ability to build hydrogen atoms on a heme residue.pdb2gmx has to have a 
specific recipe for doing that. The manualdescribes the required format and 
gives an example. Someone's goingto have to do some work.


  
  
  I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem. 
  
  By the way, here is the full command line for which I got 
 the error.
  
  $ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top 
 -i CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh



If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already correct, youdon't 
need to re-generate them...

Mark


  
  
  The error is
  
WARNING: atom HA is missing in residueHEM 513 
in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the   
 hydrogen database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in   
 the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the   
 hydrogen database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in   
 the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the   
 hydrogen database of building block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if 
   you want to use this incomplete topology anyhow, use 
   the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting,  
  please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Thanks.

Sundar Jubilant
  
  
  
 
  
  
-OriginalMessage-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:  
Dear  gmx-users,
  
  I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a  
protein with a heme group using CHARMM27 ff in  
Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the following error  while 
running pdb2gmx .

  
  When asking for help, please give your full command lines 
 and/or interactive selections so that we can know more  
context.
  
  
 
  WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in 
 the pdb file
   You might need to add atom HA

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Mark Abraham

On 20/04/2012 7:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear Abraham,

I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues since I am not sure 
if the Gromacs has an option to ignore hydrogen only for pretein 
residues but not for the heme complexed with it.


No, there is no ability to ignore them selectively - but if you want to 
ignore any of them, you have to address the heme hydrogen database 
issue, or go and remove the hydrogen atoms that you wish to ignore from 
your input coordinate file.




One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme as an ligand not as a 
part of the protein to solve this issue. How would that really affect 
the accuracy of the simulation?


It's not a question of accuracy, but rather that if you have bonded 
interactions between heme and protein, they have to be part of the same 
[moleculetype], which is what pdb2gmx is struggling to generate.


Mark



Thanks
Sundar


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to solve the 
problem but I wasn't successful.


That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a request for 
help, else you'll just get told to go and read), but is unlikely to 
get much help because you haven't identified a specific problem. You'd 
like the ability to build hydrogen atoms on a heme residue. pdb2gmx 
has to have a specific recipe for doing that. The manual describes the 
required format and gives an example. Someone's going to have to do 
some work.




I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem.

By the way, here is the full command line for which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top -i 
CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh


If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already correct, you don't 
need to re-generate them...


Mark



The error is

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Thanks.

Sundar Jubilant


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a heme 
group using CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the 
following error while running pdb2gmx .


When asking for help, please give your full command lines and/or 
interactive selections so that we can know more context.




WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Can anyone help how can I generate and add hydrogen database 
information for heme to be used with CHARMM27 ff?


You'll have to read the applicable sections

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Sundar Jubilant

 

 Dear Abraham,

How would it work if I remove the hydrogen atoms that I wish to ignore from my 
input co-ordinate file? The pdb2gmx tries to add the missing hydorgen atoms for 
which the .hdb doesn't have information.

In my case here, I can consider heme as a ligand instead of having it as 
protein since it doesn't need to be the part of the protein.

Thanks for your information.
Sundar

 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 6:42 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 7:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:
  
 Dear Abraham,

I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues since I am 
   not sure if the Gromacs has an option to ignore hydrogenonly for 
pretein residues but not for the heme complexedwith it.
  


No, there is no ability to ignore them selectively - but if you wantto 
ignore any of them, you have to address the heme hydrogendatabase issue, or 
go and remove the hydrogen atoms that you wish toignore from your input 
coordinate file.


  

One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme as an
ligand not as a part of the protein to solve this issue. Howwould 
that really affect the accuracy of the simulation?
  


It's not a question of accuracy, but rather that if you have bonded
interactions between heme and protein, they have to be part of thesame 
[moleculetype], which is what pdb2gmx is struggling togenerate.

Mark


  

Thanks
Sundar
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
-OriginalMessage-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF


  On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:  

 


 DearAbraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the  
  manual to solve the problem but I wasn't
successful.
  
  
  
  That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a
  request for help, else you'll just get told to go and  read), 
but is unlikely to get much help because you  haven't identified a 
specific problem. You'd like the  ability to build hydrogen atoms 
on a heme residue. pdb2gmx  has to have a specific recipe for doing 
that. The manual  describes the required format and gives an 
example.  Someone's going to have to do some work.
  
  

 
I need little more detailed answer to solve the 
   problem. 

By the way, here is the full command line for   
 which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p   
 CYP1_CHARMM.top -i CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh
  
  
  
  If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already  
correct, you don't need to re-generate them...
  
  Mark
  
  

 
The error is

  WARNING:  atom HA is missing 
in residue HEM 513 in  the pdb file
   You might need to add atom HA to 
 the hydrogen database of building block
  HEME
   in the file aminoacids.hdb (see  
the manual)
  
  
  WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM
  513 in the pdb file
   You might need to add atom HB to 
 the hydrogen database of building block
  HEME
   in the file aminoacids.hdb (see  
the manual)
  
  
  WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-20 Thread Mark Abraham

On 20/04/2012 9:02 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

How would it work if I remove the hydrogen atoms that I wish to ignore 
from my input co-ordinate file? The pdb2gmx tries to add the missing 
hydorgen atoms for which the .hdb doesn't have information.


You've never actually told us what hydrogens you want to ignore, so 
you're making it hard to help you.


Mark



In my case here, I can consider heme as a ligand instead of having it 
as protein since it doesn't need to be the part of the protein.


Thanks for your information.
Sundar

-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 6:42 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 7:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear Abraham,

I am ignoring hydrogens for the protein residues since I am not sure 
if the Gromacs has an option to ignore hydrogen only for pretein 
residues but not for the heme complexed with it.


No, there is no ability to ignore them selectively - but if you want 
to ignore any of them, you have to address the heme hydrogen database 
issue, or go and remove the hydrogen atoms that you wish to ignore 
from your input coordinate file.




One of my colleagues suggested to treat the Heme as an ligand not as 
a part of the protein to solve this issue. How would that really 
affect the accuracy of the simulation?


It's not a question of accuracy, but rather that if you have bonded 
interactions between heme and protein, they have to be part of the 
same [moleculetype], which is what pdb2gmx is struggling to generate.


Mark



Thanks
Sundar


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 4:38 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:


Dear Abraham,

Thanks for your email. I have already read the manual to solve the 
problem but I wasn't successful.


That's good to say (particularly the first time you post a request 
for help, else you'll just get told to go and read), but is unlikely 
to get much help because you haven't identified a specific problem. 
You'd like the ability to build hydrogen atoms on a heme residue. 
pdb2gmx has to have a specific recipe for doing that. The manual 
describes the required format and gives an example. Someone's going 
to have to do some work.




I need little more detailed answer to solve the problem.

By the way, here is the full command line for which I got the error.

$ pdb2gmx -f CYP.pdb -o CYP_CHARMM.pdb -p CYP1_CHARMM.top -i 
CYP_CHARMM.itp -ignh


If you don't ignore hydrogens, and they're already correct, you don't 
need to re-generate them...


Mark



The error is

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Thanks.

Sundar Jubilant


-Original Message-
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a heme 
group using CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the 
following error while running pdb2gmx .


When asking for help, please give your full command lines and/or 
interactive selections so that we can know more context.




WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb

[gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-19 Thread Sundar Jubilant
Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a heme group using 
CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the following error while running 
pdb2gmx .

WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of building 
block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of building 
block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of building 
block HEME
 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use this 
incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Can anyone help how can I generate and add hydrogen database information for 
heme to be used with CHARMM27 ff?

Thanks,

Sundar Jubilant
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Heme group with CHARMM27 FF

2012-04-19 Thread Mark Abraham

On 20/04/2012 2:33 PM, Sundar Jubilant wrote:

Dear gmx-users,

I am new to Gromacs and trying to simulate a protein with a heme group 
using CHARMM27 ff in Gromacs 4.5.3. I have received the following 
error while running pdb2gmx .


When asking for help, please give your full command lines and/or 
interactive selections so that we can know more context.




WARNING: atom HA is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HA to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HB is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HB to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)


WARNING: atom HC is missing in residue HEM 513 in the pdb file
 You might need to add atom HC to the hydrogen database of 
building block HEME

 in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)

.
.
.
.
.
---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.5.3
Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 1449

Fatal error:
There were 30 missing atoms in molecule Protein, if you want to use 
this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

Can anyone help how can I generate and add hydrogen database 
information for heme to be used with CHARMM27 ff?


You'll have to read the applicable sections of manual chapter 5, make a 
local copy of the charmm27.ff folder in your working directory and 
editing aminoacids.hdb to add the generation information. When you're 
done, please post your efforts so that others might be able to benefit 
from them in future. (Also, search first in case this has already happened!)


Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] HEME topology

2012-01-11 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Anik Sen wrote:

Dear nirmal,
  try prodrg server for generating the topology file 
for the said pdb file. Here is the link. 
http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/




PRODRG will be unable to handle this type of molecule, since it contains iron. 
What's more, PRODRG topologies are generally incorrect for even the simplest 
molecules.  Several of the force fields in Gromacs contain heme parameters, 
otherwise they can be found in the literature.


-Justin



*From:* gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] on 
behalf of Nirmal Prasad [nimmynir...@gmail.com]

*Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:45 AM
*To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
*Subject:* [gmx-users] HEME topology

Hello,

Can any one send topology for Heme group..My work is stuckeup

here are the PDB parameters for HEME

---

HETATM 3851 FE   HEM   482   4.876  25.216  23.893  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3852  CHA HEM   482   5.264  25.759  20.480  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3853  CHB HEM   482   8.132  24.660  24.172  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3854  CHC HEM   482   4.480  24.399  27.195  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3855  CHD HEM   482   1.700  25.148  23.458  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3856  NA  HEM   482   6.466  25.218  22.555  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3857  C1A HEM   482   6.439  25.484  21.193  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3858  C2A HEM   482   7.778  25.464  20.681  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3859  C3A HEM   482   8.610  25.197  21.767  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3860  C4A HEM   482   7.741  25.081  22.906  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3861  CMA HEM   482  10.215  25.091  21.758  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3862  CAA HEM   482   8.230  25.628  19.242  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3863  CBA HEM   482   8.574  27.061  18.804  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3864  CGA HEM   482   9.117  27.044  17.359  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3865  O1A HEM   482   9.982  27.831  17.013  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3866  O2A HEM   482   8.739  26.229  16.541  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3867  NB  HEM   482   6.104  24.497  25.449  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3868  C1B HEM   482   7.444  24.359  25.345  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3869  C2B HEM   482   8.044  24.034  26.598  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3870  C3B HEM   482   6.961  23.930  27.496  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3871  C4B HEM   482   5.778  24.182  26.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3872  CMB HEM   482   9.563  23.973  26.877  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3873  CAB HEM   482   6.964  23.552  28.851  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3874  CBB HEM   482   8.069  23.513  29.865  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3875  NC  HEM   482   3.315  24.748  25.179  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3876  C1C HEM   482   3.331  24.678  26.492  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3877  C2C HEM   482   2.053  24.644  27.006  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3878  C3C HEM   482   1.187  24.668  25.881  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3879  C4C HEM   482   2.053  24.742  24.763  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3880  CMC HEM   482   1.716  24.541  28.529  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3881  CAC HEM   482  -0.191  24.700  25.725  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3882  CBC HEM   482  -1.163  24.945  26.680  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3883  ND  HEM   482   3.655  25.286  22.181  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3884  C1D HEM   482   2.373  25.199  22.282  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3885  C2D HEM   482   1.768  25.396  21.008  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3886  C3D HEM   482   2.780  25.600  20.124  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3887  C4D HEM   482   3.958  25.545  20.924  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3888  CMD HEM   482   0.252  25.372  20.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3889  CAD HEM   482   2.755  25.897  18.597  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3890  CBD HEM   482   2.710  27.455  18.272  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3891  CGD HEM   482   2.759  27.846  16.738  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3892  O1D HEM   482   2.411  29.018  16.323  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3893  O2D HEM   482   3.210  26.948  15.911  1.00  0.00
TER3894  HEM   482



thanks in advance

nirmal



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] HEME topology

2012-01-10 Thread Nirmal Prasad
Hello,

Can any one send topology for Heme group..My work is stuckeup

here are the PDB parameters for HEME

---

HETATM 3851 FE   HEM   482   4.876  25.216  23.893  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3852  CHA HEM   482   5.264  25.759  20.480  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3853  CHB HEM   482   8.132  24.660  24.172  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3854  CHC HEM   482   4.480  24.399  27.195  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3855  CHD HEM   482   1.700  25.148  23.458  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3856  NA  HEM   482   6.466  25.218  22.555  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3857  C1A HEM   482   6.439  25.484  21.193  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3858  C2A HEM   482   7.778  25.464  20.681  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3859  C3A HEM   482   8.610  25.197  21.767  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3860  C4A HEM   482   7.741  25.081  22.906  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3861  CMA HEM   482  10.215  25.091  21.758  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3862  CAA HEM   482   8.230  25.628  19.242  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3863  CBA HEM   482   8.574  27.061  18.804  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3864  CGA HEM   482   9.117  27.044  17.359  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3865  O1A HEM   482   9.982  27.831  17.013  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3866  O2A HEM   482   8.739  26.229  16.541  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3867  NB  HEM   482   6.104  24.497  25.449  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3868  C1B HEM   482   7.444  24.359  25.345  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3869  C2B HEM   482   8.044  24.034  26.598  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3870  C3B HEM   482   6.961  23.930  27.496  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3871  C4B HEM   482   5.778  24.182  26.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3872  CMB HEM   482   9.563  23.973  26.877  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3873  CAB HEM   482   6.964  23.552  28.851  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3874  CBB HEM   482   8.069  23.513  29.865  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3875  NC  HEM   482   3.315  24.748  25.179  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3876  C1C HEM   482   3.331  24.678  26.492  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3877  C2C HEM   482   2.053  24.644  27.006  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3878  C3C HEM   482   1.187  24.668  25.881  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3879  C4C HEM   482   2.053  24.742  24.763  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3880  CMC HEM   482   1.716  24.541  28.529  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3881  CAC HEM   482  -0.191  24.700  25.725  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3882  CBC HEM   482  -1.163  24.945  26.680  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3883  ND  HEM   482   3.655  25.286  22.181  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3884  C1D HEM   482   2.373  25.199  22.282  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3885  C2D HEM   482   1.768  25.396  21.008  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3886  C3D HEM   482   2.780  25.600  20.124  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3887  C4D HEM   482   3.958  25.545  20.924  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3888  CMD HEM   482   0.252  25.372  20.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3889  CAD HEM   482   2.755  25.897  18.597  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3890  CBD HEM   482   2.710  27.455  18.272  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3891  CGD HEM   482   2.759  27.846  16.738  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3892  O1D HEM   482   2.411  29.018  16.323  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3893  O2D HEM   482   3.210  26.948  15.911  1.00  0.00
TER3894  HEM   482



thanks in advance

nirmal
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

RE: [gmx-users] HEME topology

2012-01-10 Thread Anik Sen
Dear nirmal,
  try prodrg server for generating the topology file for 
the said pdb file. Here is the link. http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/


From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] on behalf 
of Nirmal Prasad [nimmynir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:45 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: [gmx-users] HEME topology

Hello,

Can any one send topology for Heme group..My work is stuckeup

here are the PDB parameters for HEME

---

HETATM 3851 FE   HEM   482   4.876  25.216  23.893  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3852  CHA HEM   482   5.264  25.759  20.480  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3853  CHB HEM   482   8.132  24.660  24.172  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3854  CHC HEM   482   4.480  24.399  27.195  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3855  CHD HEM   482   1.700  25.148  23.458  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3856  NA  HEM   482   6.466  25.218  22.555  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3857  C1A HEM   482   6.439  25.484  21.193  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3858  C2A HEM   482   7.778  25.464  20.681  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3859  C3A HEM   482   8.610  25.197  21.767  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3860  C4A HEM   482   7.741  25.081  22.906  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3861  CMA HEM   482  10.215  25.091  21.758  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3862  CAA HEM   482   8.230  25.628  19.242  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3863  CBA HEM   482   8.574  27.061  18.804  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3864  CGA HEM   482   9.117  27.044  17.359  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3865  O1A HEM   482   9.982  27.831  17.013  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3866  O2A HEM   482   8.739  26.229  16.541  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3867  NB  HEM   482   6.104  24.497  25.449  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3868  C1B HEM   482   7.444  24.359  25.345  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3869  C2B HEM   482   8.044  24.034  26.598  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3870  C3B HEM   482   6.961  23.930  27.496  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3871  C4B HEM   482   5.778  24.182  26.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3872  CMB HEM   482   9.563  23.973  26.877  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3873  CAB HEM   482   6.964  23.552  28.851  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3874  CBB HEM   482   8.069  23.513  29.865  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3875  NC  HEM   482   3.315  24.748  25.179  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3876  C1C HEM   482   3.331  24.678  26.492  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3877  C2C HEM   482   2.053  24.644  27.006  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3878  C3C HEM   482   1.187  24.668  25.881  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3879  C4C HEM   482   2.053  24.742  24.763  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3880  CMC HEM   482   1.716  24.541  28.529  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3881  CAC HEM   482  -0.191  24.700  25.725  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3882  CBC HEM   482  -1.163  24.945  26.680  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3883  ND  HEM   482   3.655  25.286  22.181  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3884  C1D HEM   482   2.373  25.199  22.282  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3885  C2D HEM   482   1.768  25.396  21.008  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3886  C3D HEM   482   2.780  25.600  20.124  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3887  C4D HEM   482   3.958  25.545  20.924  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3888  CMD HEM   482   0.252  25.372  20.693  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3889  CAD HEM   482   2.755  25.897  18.597  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3890  CBD HEM   482   2.710  27.455  18.272  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3891  CGD HEM   482   2.759  27.846  16.738  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3892  O1D HEM   482   2.411  29.018  16.323  1.00  0.00
HETATM 3893  O2D HEM   482   3.210  26.948  15.911  1.00  0.00
TER3894  HEM   482



thanks in advance

nirmal
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] Heme group in the forcefield gromos53a6

2011-01-18 Thread Tanos Celmar Costa Franca

Dear users,
We are trying to perform a MD simulation of a protein with a heme  
group using the gromos53a6 force field but when trying to run grompp  
we receive the error mesage:

Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: ../../../../src/kernel/toppush.c, line: 947

Fatal error:
Atomtype FE2+ not found

How can it happen if the gromos53a6 force field have parameters to the  
heme group ?

Does someone knows how to fix it ?

Tanos Celmar Costa Franca - D.Sc
Coordenador do Programa de Pos-graduacão em Química
Secão de Engenharia Química - SE/5
Instituto Militar de Engenharia - IME
Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Brasil






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Heme group in the forcefield gromos53a6

2011-01-18 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Tanos Celmar Costa Franca wrote:

Dear users,
We are trying to perform a MD simulation of a protein with a heme group 
using the gromos53a6 force field but when trying to run grompp we 
receive the error mesage:

Program grompp, VERSION 4.0.3
Source code file: ../../../../src/kernel/toppush.c, line: 947

Fatal error:
Atomtype FE2+ not found

How can it happen if the gromos53a6 force field have parameters to the 
heme group ?

Does someone knows how to fix it ?


Heme parameters are included in 53A6, but they don't make reference to any such 
FE2+ atomtype.  The .rtp and .atp files specify an FE atomtype, though. 
You're still probably going to run into missing bonded parameters for the 
connection between your protein and heme.  I don't know what the solution for 
that is, though.


Also, unless you have a specific reason for using a Gromacs version that is two 
years old (as of today, exactly!) then you should upgrade to a more recent 
(preferably the most recent) version, to take advantage of numerous bug fixes 
and feature additions.


http://www.gromacs.org/About_Gromacs/Release_Notes/Versions_4.0.x

-Justin



Tanos Celmar Costa Franca - D.Sc
Coordenador do Programa de Pos-graduacão em Química
Secão de Engenharia Química - SE/5
Instituto Militar de Engenharia - IME
Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Brasil






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] heme

2010-11-26 Thread shahid nayeem
Hi Erik
I am using ffG43a1 force field. It has heme topology. But in Cyt C. FE is
bonded to both NR of HIS and SD of MET. The parameter for the bond, FE SD,
 angles e.g. NR (HIS) FE SD(MET)  and dihedral  angle CH2(MET)  SD (MET) FE
NR(HIS) is missing in this force field. hence I am getting error while
running grompp. Please suggest me what should I do.
Shahid Nayeem

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Erik Marklund er...@xray.bmc.uu.se wrote:

 shahid nayeem skrev 2010-11-24 18.02:

  Dear all
 I am trying MD of cyt C containing heme. I am able to generate bonds with
 specbond.dat by pdb2gmx. After using editconf and genbox, when I tried
 grompp I got error about unrecognized bonds/angles. I made bond with MET SD
 and FE of Heme. As earlier suggested on this list I wrote to get parameter
 for these bonds but I couldnt get it. If someone on this mailing list can
 help me I will be grateful. Cyt C is very widely modelled protein with
 Gomacs in literature hence I expect to get some help from the forum.
 shahid nayeem

 A long time ago I simulated CytC with one of the gromos force fields. It
 worked right out of the box. What forcefield are you using?

 --
 ---
 Erik Marklund, PhD student
 Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
 Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
 phone:+46 18 471 4537fax: +46 18 511 755
 er...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se/

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] heme

2010-11-24 Thread shahid nayeem
Dear all
I am trying MD of cyt C containing heme. I am able to generate bonds with
specbond.dat by pdb2gmx. After using editconf and genbox, when I tried
grompp I got error about unrecognized bonds/angles. I made bond with MET SD
and FE of Heme. As earlier suggested on this list I wrote to get parameter
for these bonds but I couldnt get it. If someone on this mailing list can
help me I will be grateful. Cyt C is very widely modelled protein with
Gomacs in literature hence I expect to get some help from the forum.
shahid nayeem
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] heme

2010-11-24 Thread Erik Marklund

shahid nayeem skrev 2010-11-24 18.02:

Dear all
I am trying MD of cyt C containing heme. I am able to generate bonds 
with specbond.dat by pdb2gmx. After using editconf and genbox, when I 
tried grompp I got error about unrecognized bonds/angles. I made bond 
with MET SD and FE of Heme. As earlier suggested on this list I wrote 
to get parameter for these bonds but I couldnt get it. If someone on 
this mailing list can help me I will be grateful. Cyt C is very widely 
modelled protein with Gomacs in literature hence I expect to get some 
help from the forum.

shahid nayeem
A long time ago I simulated CytC with one of the gromos force fields. It 
worked right out of the box. What forcefield are you using?


--
---
Erik Marklund, PhD student
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:+46 18 471 4537fax: +46 18 511 755
er...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se/

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] heme

2010-11-24 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Erik Marklund wrote:

shahid nayeem skrev 2010-11-24 18.02:

Dear all
I am trying MD of cyt C containing heme. I am able to generate bonds 
with specbond.dat by pdb2gmx. After using editconf and genbox, when I 
tried grompp I got error about unrecognized bonds/angles. I made bond 
with MET SD and FE of Heme. As earlier suggested on this list I wrote 
to get parameter for these bonds but I couldnt get it. If someone on 
this mailing list can help me I will be grateful. Cyt C is very widely 
modelled protein with Gomacs in literature hence I expect to get some 
help from the forum.

shahid nayeem
A long time ago I simulated CytC with one of the gromos force fields. It 
worked right out of the box. What forcefield are you using?




The same problem is frequently reported.  The inter-residue bonds and angles are 
not assigned in pdb2gmx, nor are they present in the force field, IIRC.  Hence 
the fatal errors.  Perhaps something has changed since a long time ago, but I 
am sure problems exist in recent versions.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] heme

2010-11-24 Thread shahid nayeem
I am using ffG43a1 forcefield. its .rtp file contains topology of Heme but
Met SD and FE bond is not there.
Shahid Nayeem

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 Erik Marklund wrote:

 shahid nayeem skrev 2010-11-24 18.02:

 Dear all
 I am trying MD of cyt C containing heme. I am able to generate bonds with
 specbond.dat by pdb2gmx. After using editconf and genbox, when I tried
 grompp I got error about unrecognized bonds/angles. I made bond with MET SD
 and FE of Heme. As earlier suggested on this list I wrote to get parameter
 for these bonds but I couldnt get it. If someone on this mailing list can
 help me I will be grateful. Cyt C is very widely modelled protein with
 Gomacs in literature hence I expect to get some help from the forum.
 shahid nayeem

 A long time ago I simulated CytC with one of the gromos force fields. It
 worked right out of the box. What forcefield are you using?


 The same problem is frequently reported.  The inter-residue bonds and
 angles are not assigned in pdb2gmx, nor are they present in the force field,
 IIRC.  Hence the fatal errors.  Perhaps something has changed since a long
 time ago, but I am sure problems exist in recent versions.

 -Justin

 --
 

 Justin A. Lemkul
 Ph.D. Candidate
 ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
 MILES-IGERT Trainee
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 

 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] HEME-cysteine gromacs simulation

2009-08-25 Thread 郭建路
HI all:

I want to run a simulation with  heme group(cytochrome p450). i have made a 3-d 
structure model for a cytochrome p450 .I use the ffG43a1 force field,someone 
told me that i need both suitable parameters for your desired force field, and 
then to construct a correct topology. I read lots of papers,but most of them 
used amber force field.Befor runing the gromacs molecular simulation,i define 
the heme group as a new residue in the .rtp files,following the required 
formats(atoms,bonds exclusions,angles,impropers,dihedrals)and then define a new 
FE-S bong.

i run the simulation like this:

pdb2gmx -ignh -ff G43a1 -f CYP2W1_CYSHEME.pdb -o new1.pdb -p new1.top -water 
spce   
editconf -bt cubic -f new1.pdb -o new2.pdb -d 0.9   

genbox -cp new2.pdb -cs spc216.gro -o new3.pdb -p new1.top  

grompp -f em.mdp -c new3.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr  

genion -s em.tpr -o new5.pdb -nname CL- -nn 1 -g ion.log; Edit top file, 
delette em.tpr 
grompp -f em.mdp -c new5.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr  

mdrun -s em.tpr -o em.trr -c new7.pdb -g em.log -e em.edr   

grompp -f pr.mdp -c new7.pdb -p new1.top -o pr.tpr  

mdrun -s pr.tpr -o pr.trr -c new9.mdp -e pr.edr -g pr.log 

 1 i run pdb2gmx and get the new1.pdb ,when checking the pdb with accelrys ds 
visualizer or sybyl,the atom FE was recognized as F (Fluorine)and the pdb miss 
the bonds between FE-S FE-N,i add or delete a blank space befor or after the 
FE in the pdb file,it was read as iron(FE) again but still missing;when 
checking the .top file,there was a FE (both atom name and type)and formed the 
FE-S  FE-N bonds.

if i ignore the above things,go on the command ,when runing the em.mdp there is 
a tip that Steepest Descents failed converged to Fmax  1000 in 5001 steps.when 
run the pr.tpr,a error emerged as segment fatal error。

2 someone told me that i need both suitable parameters for your desired force 
field, and then to construct a correct topology. I read lots of papers,but most 
of them used amber force field.Does anyone known a paper with a gromacs force 
field for HEME group?

please help me how handle those problems,how can i go on the simulation?

the HEME-cysteine parameter in the rtp files,define themas a new residue.(is 
there any problems?)

[ HEME ] 
 [ atoms ]   
N N-0.28000 0
H H 0.28000 0
   CA   CH1 0.0 1
   CB   CH2-0.1 2
   SG S-0.4 2
C C 0.38000 3
O O-0.38000 3
   FEFE 0.84700 4
   NANR-0.37000 4
   NBNR-0.42300 4
   NCNR-0.50400 4

 [ bonds ]   
N Hgb_2  
NCAgb_20 
   CA Cgb_26 
C Ogb_4  
C+Ngb_9  
   CACBgb_26 
   CBSGgb_30 
   SGFEgb_48 
   FENAgb_34 
   FENBgb_34 
   FENCgb_34 
   FENDgb_34   

.  
 [ angles ]  
;  aiajak   gromos type  
   -C N H ga_31  
H NCA ga_17  
   -C NCA ga_30  
NCA C ga_12  
   CA C+N ga_18  
   CA C O ga_29  
 ...   
 [ impropers ]   
;  aiajakal   gromos type
N-CCA H gi_1 
CCA+N O gi_1 
   CA N CCB gi_2 
   FESGNAND gi_3 
   FESGNANB gi_3 
   FESGNBNC gi_3 
   FESGNCND gi_3 
  . 
 [ dihedrals ]   
;  aiajakal   gromos type
  .


没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net





没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] HEME-cysteine gromacs simulation

2009-08-25 Thread Mark Abraham

?? wrote:

HI all:

I want to run a simulation with  heme group(cytochrome p450). i have made a 3-d 
structure model for a cytochrome p450 .I use the ffG43a1 force field,someone 
told me that i need both suitable parameters for your desired force field, and 
then to construct a correct topology. I read lots of papers,but most of them 
used amber force field.Befor runing the gromacs molecular simulation,i define 
the heme group as a new residue in the .rtp files,following the required 
formats(atoms,bonds exclusions,angles,impropers,dihedrals)and then define a new 
FE-S bong.

i run the simulation like this:

pdb2gmx -ignh -ff G43a1 -f CYP2W1_CYSHEME.pdb -o new1.pdb -p new1.top -water spce   
editconf -bt cubic -f new1.pdb -o new2.pdb -d 0.9   
genbox -cp new2.pdb -cs spc216.gro -o new3.pdb -p new1.top  
grompp -f em.mdp -c new3.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr  
genion -s em.tpr -o new5.pdb -nname CL- -nn 1 -g ion.log; Edit top file, delette em.tpr 
grompp -f em.mdp -c new5.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr  
mdrun -s em.tpr -o em.trr -c new7.pdb -g em.log -e em.edr   
grompp -f pr.mdp -c new7.pdb -p new1.top -o pr.tpr  
mdrun -s pr.tpr -o pr.trr -c new9.mdp -e pr.edr -g pr.log 


 1 i run pdb2gmx and get the new1.pdb ,when checking the pdb with accelrys ds 
visualizer or sybyl,the atom FE was recognized as F (Fluorine)and the pdb miss the 
bonds between FE-S FE-N,i add or delete a blank space befor or after the FE in the 
pdb file,it was read as iron(FE) again but still missing;when checking the .top 
file,there was a FE (both atom name and type)and formed the FE-S  FE-N bonds.


Visualization programs have to use heuristics to guess where bonds are 
and what names occur for which atoms (HG1 might be mercury or the first 
hydrogen on a gamma carbon, NE might be neon or an epsilon nitrogen, 
etc.). Only if you are able to read in a .tpr (such as with ngmx 
distributed inside GROMACS) can you get any visual confirmation of what 
GROMACS thinks you have described in your topology. There is no 
standardized widely-used mechanism for including such information in a 
PDB file, and so such usage of a file is unreliable.



if i ignore the above things,go on the command ,when runing the em.mdp there is a 
tip that Steepest Descents failed converged to Fmax  1000 in 5001 steps.when 
run the pr.tpr,a error emerged as segment fatal error??


Read the .log files as well. GROMACS almost never segfaults (except when 
subjected to buggy MPI libraries), and when it does it will normally 
write some diagnostic information to stdout or the .log file.



2 someone told me that i need both suitable parameters for your desired force 
field, and then to construct a correct topology. I read lots of papers,but most 
of them used amber force field.Does anyone known a paper with a gromacs force 
field for HEME group?


Sorry, I can't help there.


please help me how handle those problems,how can i go on the simulation?

the HEME-cysteine parameter in the rtp files,define themas a new residue.(is 
there any problems?)


Look at the results in ngmx to get started. Try generating a structure 
for some minimalist version of the heme group and get EM and MD to work 
on that first. If you reduce the complexity, you can eliminate potential 
sources of problems until you find the source.


Mark

[ HEME ] 
 [ atoms ]   
N N-0.28000 0
H H 0.28000 0
   CA   CH1 0.0 1
   CB   CH2-0.1 2
   SG S-0.4 2
C C 0.38000 3
O O-0.38000 3
   FEFE 0.84700 4
   NANR-0.37000 4
   NBNR-0.42300 4
   NCNR-0.50400 4

 [ bonds ]   
N Hgb_2  
NCAgb_20 
   CA Cgb_26 
C Ogb_4  
C+Ngb_9  
   CACBgb_26 
   CBSGgb_30 
   SGFEgb_48 
   FENAgb_34 
   FENBgb_34 
   FENCgb_34 
   FENDgb_34   

.  
 [ angles ]  
;  aiajak   gromos type  
   -C N H ga_31  
H NCA ga_17  
   -C NCA ga_30  
NCA C ga_12  
   CA C+N ga_18  
   CA C O ga_29  
 ...   
 [ impropers ]   
;  aiajakal   gromos type
N-CCA H gi_1 
CCA+N 

[gmx-users] HEME-cysteine gromacs simulation

2009-08-25 Thread chris . neale
You always need a correct topology. The main issue here is that you  
need to have correct parameters. Where did you get your heme and Fe  
parameters? Were you careful about the Fe state oxidation state? I  
suspect that most people use Amber because of their antechamber  
program, which seems like a brilliant idea even if it may overstretch  
it's own parameterization without letting you know. I have no specific  
advice for you here beyond saying that it is worth spending a month  
figuring out what parameters you should really be using (hint: why  
would you be using ffG43a1 if most others use Amber here? do you know  
something that they don't?). This will end up saving you time in the  
long run.


Note that ffG43a1 is the GROMOS forcefield, not the  GROMACS  
forcefield. It is unfortunate that many programs (Amber, Charmm,  
gromacs) have their own similarly named forcefield, but that does not  
mean that the forcefield must be used with the associated program.  
There are forcefields that are not associated with a program (OPLS)  
and programs that never developed their own force field (NAMD,  
Desmond, Tinker, LAMMPS), so it is perfectly ok for you to use the  
amber forcefield with the gromacs program.


Bottom line: read, read, read.

Chris.

-- original message --

I want to run a simulation with  heme group(cytochrome p450). i have  
made a 3-d structure model for a cytochrome p450 .I use the ffG43a1  
force field,someone told me that i need both suitable parameters for  
your desired force field, and then to construct a correct topology. I  
read lots of papers,but most of them used amber force field.Befor  
runing the gromacs molecular simulation,i define the heme group as a  
new residue in the .rtp files,following the required  
formats(atoms,bonds exclusions,angles,impropers,dihedrals)and then  
define a new FE-S bong.


i run the simulation like this:

pdb2gmx -ignh -ff G43a1 -f CYP2W1_CYSHEME.pdb -o new1.pdb -p new1.top  
-water spce

editconf -bt cubic -f new1.pdb -o new2.pdb -d 0.9
genbox -cp new2.pdb -cs spc216.gro -o new3.pdb -p new1.top
grompp -f em.mdp -c new3.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr
genion -s em.tpr -o new5.pdb -nname CL- -nn 1 -g ion.log; Edit top  
file, delette em.tpr

grompp -f em.mdp -c new5.pdb -p new1.top -o em.tpr
mdrun -s em.tpr -o em.trr -c new7.pdb -g em.log -e em.edr
grompp -f pr.mdp -c new7.pdb -p new1.top -o pr.tpr
mdrun -s pr.tpr -o pr.trr -c new9.mdp -e pr.edr -g pr.log

 1 i run pdb2gmx and get the new1.pdb ,when checking the pdb with  
accelrys ds visualizer or sybyl,the atom FE was recognized as F  
(Fluorine)and the pdb miss the bonds between FE-S FE-N,i add or  
delete a blank space befor or after the FE in the pdb file,it was read  
as iron(FE) again but still missing;when checking the .top file,there  
was a FE (both atom name and type)and formed the FE-S  FE-N bonds.


if i ignore the above things,go on the command ,when runing the em.mdp  
there is a tip that Steepest Descents failed converged to Fmax  1000  
in 5001 steps.when run the pr.tpr,a error emerged as segment fatal  
error¡£


2 someone told me that i need both suitable parameters for your  
desired force field, and then to construct a correct topology. I read  
lots of papers,but most of them used amber force field.Does anyone  
known a paper with a gromacs force field for HEME group?


please help me how handle those problems,how can i go on the simulation?

the HEME-cysteine parameter in the rtp files,define themas a new  
residue.(is there any problems?)


[ HEME ]
 [ atoms ]
N N-0.28000 0
H H 0.28000 0
   CA   CH1 0.0 1
   CB   CH2-0.1 2
   SG S-0.4 2
C C 0.38000 3
O O-0.38000 3
   FEFE 0.84700 4
   NANR-0.37000 4
   NBNR-0.42300 4
   NCNR-0.50400 4

 [ bonds ]
N Hgb_2
NCAgb_20
   CA Cgb_26
C Ogb_4
C+Ngb_9
   CACBgb_26
   CBSGgb_30
   SGFEgb_48
   FENAgb_34
   FENBgb_34
   FENCgb_34
   FENDgb_34

.
 [ angles ]
;  aiajak   gromos type
   -C N H ga_31
H NCA ga_17
   -C NCA ga_30
NCA C ga_12
   CA C+N ga_18
   CA C O ga_29
 ...
 [ impropers ]
;  aiajakal   gromos type
N-CCA H gi_1
CCA+N O gi_1
   CA N CCB gi_2
   FESGNAND gi_3
   FESGNANB gi_3
   FESGNBNC gi_3
   FESGNCND gi_3
  .
 [ dihedrals ]
;  aiajakal   gromos type
  .


ûÓйã¸æµÄÖÕÉíÃâ·ÑÓÊÏä,www.yeah.net




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search 

Re: [gmx-users] HEME topology

2008-09-26 Thread Tim Meyer
 Also is there some heme topology in the public domain that I can compare
 my parametrisation with ?
at the amber parameter database, all and united atom.

http://www.pharmacy.manchester.ac.uk/bryce/amber

tim
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] HEME topology

2008-09-25 Thread Shozeb Haider

Hi,

I am trying to simulate HEME in a water box. I generated HEME topology 
based on the parameters in the ffG43a2.rtp file. When I run a short 
burst of unrestrained dynamics, it does not remain planar. I understand 
that there might be some buckling but not to the extent that I am 
observing.


My questions is - Do I need to add some more parameters other than the 
default ones in the .top file ? (Impropers and Dihedrals already exist 
with planar flags)


Also is there some heme topology in the public domain that I can compare 
my parametrisation with ?


Many thanks

Shozeb Haider
The London School of Pharmacy
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] HEME topology

2008-09-25 Thread Chris Neale

Take a look at the charm file: top_all22_prot.inp
Specifically, RESI HEME
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Heme-O2 parameters

2008-07-01 Thread Rotem Sertchook

Dear All,

I'm looking for gromacs parameters for  heme  bound to oxygen  
molecule . I will appreciate getting the parameters or any tip  
considering the best way to create them.


Thank you

Rotem Sertchook
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Heme-O2 parameters

2008-07-01 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
If they are not among the user contributions, and if they are not 
published somewhere in the literature, you will have to derive them 
yourself (an advanced topic!).  See here:


http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Parameterization

And this one is probably applicable in your case, as well:

http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Exotic_Species

-Justin

Rotem Sertchook wrote:

Dear All,

I'm looking for gromacs parameters for  heme  bound to oxygen molecule 
. I will appreciate getting the parameters or any tip considering the 
best way to create them.


Thank you

Rotem Sertchook
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin



___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] HEME simulation

2007-07-23 Thread gromacs user
Dear all,
 
 I am trying to run a simulation of the interaction between two HEME in water. 
I have done it without problem, but when I use the calculated charge of HEME 
atoms from ab initio calculation I have problem.
 
 The enery minimaization was run without problem with the results:
 
 Steepest Descents converged to Fmax  2000 in 84 steps
 Potential Energy  = -1.5738966e+05
 Maximum force =  1.8819653e+03 on atom 77
 Norm of force =  9.0745400e+03
 
 When I try to run position restraint dynamic the process end with error as 
follow:
 
 
  
 t = 1.108 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 10423 can not be settled. Check 
for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.Wrote pdb files with previous and 
current coordinates.
 
 
 I checked the simulation and I see some of atoms are transfered to the out of 
the box. I reduced timestep and changed box type and coulombtype and deleted 
some water, but I didn t have any result. Also, the charge in my topology file 
is as follow:
 
 FE1.31
 NA -0.78
 NB -0.81
 NC -0.8
 ND -0.79
 CHA0.33
 HHA0.0
 C1A0.24
 C2A0.04
 C3A0.06
 C4A0.22
 CMA0.03
 CAA0.02
 CBA0.07
 CGA0.5
 O1A-0.18
 O2A-0.46
 CHB0.04
 HHB0.0
 C1B0.22
 C2B0.06
 C3B-0.02
 C4B0.22
 CMB0.03
 CAB0.07
 CBB-0.01
 CHC0.05
 HHC0.0
 C1C0.22
 C2C0.06
 C3C-0.03
 C4C0.22
 CMC0.02
 CAC0.08
 CBC-0.01
 CHD0.05
 HHD0.0
 C1D0.23
 C2D0.05
 C3D0.04
 C4D0.24
 CMD0.03
 CAD0.0
 CBD0.0
 CGD0.41
 O1D-0.61
 O2D-0.66
 H1A0.0
 
 
 What should I do?
 
 Thanks a lot
 
 
 
 
 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] HEME simulation

2007-07-23 Thread David van der Spoel

gromacs user wrote:

Dear all,

I am trying to run a simulation of the interaction between two HEME in 
water. I have done it without problem, but when I use the calculated 
charge of HEME atoms from ab initio calculation I have problem.


The enery minimaization was run without problem with the results:

Steepest Descents converged to Fmax  2000 in 84 steps
Potential Energy  = -1.5738966e+05
Maximum force =  1.8819653e+03 on atom 77
Norm of force =  9.0745400e+03

When I try to run position restraint dynamic the process end with error 
as follow:



check your energy components. are the bonds and angles low enough (this 
is in the minimization). How do the values differ in the dynamics?


--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php