Re: [Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay

2006-10-17 Thread Mario Goveia
 --- Goa's Pride Goa-World.Com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  There are numerous examples of this,  notable 
  among them being the reasons for the Gandhi 
  family to remain in  politics at various times
  inspite of Rajiv’s disinterest, Sonia’s 
  unwillingness and then the children, Rahul and 
  Priyanka’s having better  things to do. Or lately 
  Supriya following in the tradition and footsteps 
  of her father, the redoubtable Maratha, Sharad 
  Pawar. Politics automatically bestows an armour 
  of invincibility on the individual of being 
  beyond the law, at least as far as India is 
  concerned. 
  www.oheraldo.in
  
--- Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear Mr Kamat,
 
 Although I agree with you that there is a tendency
 for political dynasties in India, I strongly resent 
 the Nehru family being cited as an example and no 
 other context provided. Please bear in mind that 
 this family has split their blood for India and if 
 the Indian in the village, the Indian in the slum, 
 the India in the factory wishes to believe that 
 this family has their best interests at heart, then 
 more power to them. 
 
 Afterall, the last time I checked India was a
 democratic country and elections are held to elect
 our representations. 

Mario observes:

Selma,
I think you meant the Nehru family spilled their
blood, rather than split their blood.

You are absolutely correct that a country has to
respect the wishes of the electorate.  Though an
electorate in a country with a high illiteracy rate
may be swayed by factors that may not turn out to be
in their best interests, one hopes that they will
adjust with time and experience.  If the electorate
perpetuates a dynasty, so be it.  Furthermore, unlike
some dynasties in other countries, no one could accuse
the Nehru dynasty of anything but the best of
intentions.

Unfortunately, what the post-independance Nehru
family, who were heroes and leaders in the fight for
independance, did split was India's business class,
for whom they had the utmost contempt.  Instead, they
implemented Fabian socialism and government
bureaucratic control over India's economy.  This then
held India's economy back, caused the massive brain
drain that has only recently slowed, and did not
benefit most of the country until a new national hero,
Manmohan Singh, was able to make important
adjustments, which the BJP continued until Manmohan
Singh regained control more recently, this time with
the support of yet another Nehru family member.



___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay

2006-10-17 Thread Floriano
Dearest Selma,

Unfortunately, for (scientist) Nandkumar Kamat, Atal Behari Vajpayee of his
revered BJP
is a bachelor and has no hopes in hell of having offsprings inspite of his
knees (or should I say one knee) being very weak. And  Advani, inspite of
his  having offsprings of his
own, cannot  sit on the chair of the Prime Minister of India, inspite of
his lifetime dreams, but on the the contrary,   he is an immediate candidate
for the inside of the Tihar jail  for Babri Masjid demolition, and has no
hope in hell (again) of
creating the dynastic rule that Nehru family of India established. Nandkumar
Kamat (for all of his internet based research) botanist et al, must realise
that Nehru was the son of Motilal Nehru, an all Indian philantrophist, who,
to the envy
of most of the affluent British, saw that a chauffer driven rolce-royce each
was standing at either gate of the University College where his son was
studying, to pick him up, after school, whether he strayed to the North or
the South gate. Advani or Vajpayee do not have a hope in hell of doing that,
even if they craved for it. Do they indeed??

Therefore, dear Selma, let  Nandkumar Kamat break his heart and feel sore
over the fact
that his immediate dynastic hero (of his dreams) Mr Manohar Parrikar of the
RSS-BJP (GOA),  in whose presence he would mostly want to wet his pants,
will never,
repeat, never get re-elected from the Panjim Constituency, even by a freak
of
fate for Dr. Nandkumar Kamat to prostrate himself, to proclaim his hero's
glory.

I do hope that  Nandkumar Kamat does like to take a toke of any alcohol, the
best tha can help is the home-grown feni,  to drown his disappointment.

And, if you should have a line of communication with Dr. Nandkumar Kamat,
tell him that  I said so.

Floriano Lobo
goasuraj

- Original Message -
From: Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994!
goanet@lists.goanet.org
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay


Dear Mr Kamat,

Although I agree with you that there is a tendency for
political dynasties in India, I strongly resent the
Nehru family being cited as an example and no other
context provided. Please bear in mind that this family
has split their blood for India and if the Indian in
the village, the Indian in the slum, the India in the
factory wishes to believe that this family has their
best interests at heart, then more power to them.

Afterall, the last time I checked India was a
democratic country and elections are held to elect our
representations. If you are citing the Nehrus as an
example of political dynastic rule then put things in
their proper perspective and give us reasons as to why
they have remained in power over the decades otherwise
your article speaks of nothing more than your own
biases.

selma
-

--- Goa's Pride Goa-World.Com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are numerous
 examples
 of this,  notable among them being the reasons for
 the
 Gandhi family to remain in  politics at various
 times
 inspite of Rajiv's disinterest, Sonia's
 unwillingness
 and then the children, Rahul and Priyanka's having
 better  things to do. Or lately Supriya following in
 the tradition and footsteps of her father, the
 redoubtable Maratha, Sharad Pawar. Politics
 automatically bestows an armour of invincibility on
 the individual of being beyond the law, at least as
 far as India is concerned.
 www.oheraldo.in



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/52 - Release Date: 7/19/05




___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay/response to Mario

2006-10-17 Thread Carvalho
Dear Mario,

I think we are fundamentally on the same page here.
It's true that Nehru led the country on a path to
self-destruction with his socialist agenda, but let me
put his socialism in context. Nehru although a product
of solid western education had a deep suspicion and
dislike for all things western (which didn't ofcourse
extend to Lady Mountbatten :))

After independence he wanted to distance himself from
western ideology  on priciple and unfortunately he
equated capitalism with western imperialism. Add to
this socialism was in its heydays. The stories coming
out of Russia of reform and rapid industrialisation
were compelling. We now know underneath lay rotting
poverty. On the other side of the pond, not even
Americans fifty years ago could have dreamed of the
affluence that the free market would herald. The free
market did two things, it fostered innovation and
technology and left the rest of the world behind.

Getting back to Mr Kamat. I don't know his writing but
through private emails I've been told that he is a BJP
sympathiser and his writing shows this bias. 

The fact that the Nehru family is a political dynasty
cannot be contested. But he doesn't provide a context
as to why, instead he muddies their reputation in
allegations of corruption. India is a country where
almost 60% of the population is either illiterate or
semi-literate. Their poverty and illiteracy makes them
victims of a saviour-complex and they foist their
hopes and aspirations onto this family. Indeed Sonia
is lovingly embraced by the millions of poor who see
her as a genuine person and interested in their
welfare.

The Nehrus are icons in India. They are part of our
history woven into the very fabric of our Indian
consciousness. They have given us their daughter and
their son, forsaken their families and risked their
lives for us. Have you ever heard of Americans
speaking ill of Lincoln or Eisenhower or Roosevelt,
regardless of the party they belong to? The fact that
we as Indians do this frequently is telling of how
divided we are as a country and how contemptuous we
are of our history. 

I have only this to say to Mr Kamat. Shame on you,
Shame on you indeed.
Selma
--

--- Mario Goveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Selma,
 
 Unfortunately, what the post-independance Nehru
 family, who were heroes and leaders in the fight for
 independance, did split was India's business class,
 for whom they had the utmost contempt.  Instead,
 they
 implemented Fabian socialism and government
 bureaucratic control over India's economy.  This
 then
 held India's economy back, caused the massive brain
 drain that has only recently slowed, and did not
 benefit most of the country until a new national
 hero,
 Manmohan Singh, was able to make important
 adjustments, which the BJP continued until Manmohan
 Singh regained control more recently, this time with
 the support of yet another Nehru family member.
 
 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


[Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay

2006-10-15 Thread Goa's Pride Goa-World.Com
Dynastic politics to stay
S Kamat, Alto Betim

Last week Vishwajeet Rane was appointed as the
Congress General Secretary.  This is yet another
indication of the dynastic trend in Indian politics. 
There is a compulsion among existing political
families to have at least one  of their members to
remain in politics. The logic of the matter is simple.
 The necessity for this is to protect the family
silver. 

The ill gotten gains  that these politicians
accumulate over their stint in politics is something 
that cannot be sneezed at. Such large sums, both in
movable and immovable  assets, need to be kept safely.
The easiest method to do this is to have the  family
remain in political life. There are numerous examples
of this,  notable among them being the reasons for the
Gandhi family to remain in  politics at various times
inspite of Rajiv’s disinterest, Sonia’s  unwillingness
and then the children, Rahul and Priyanka’s having
better  things to do. Or lately Supriya following in
the tradition and footsteps of her father, the
redoubtable Maratha, Sharad Pawar. Politics
automatically bestows an armour of invincibility on
the individual of being beyond the law, at least as
far as India is concerned.
www.oheraldo.in

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Dynastic politics to stay

2006-10-15 Thread Carvalho
Dear Mr Kamat,

Although I agree with you that there is a tendency for
political dynasties in India, I strongly resent the
Nehru family being cited as an example and no other
context provided. Please bear in mind that this family
has split their blood for India and if the Indian in
the village, the Indian in the slum, the India in the
factory wishes to believe that this family has their
best interests at heart, then more power to them. 

Afterall, the last time I checked India was a
democratic country and elections are held to elect our
representations. If you are citing the Nehrus as an
example of political dynastic rule then put things in
their proper perspective and give us reasons as to why
they have remained in power over the decades otherwise
your article speaks of nothing more than your own
biases.

selma
-

--- Goa's Pride Goa-World.Com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are numerous
 examples
 of this,  notable among them being the reasons for
 the
 Gandhi family to remain in  politics at various
 times
 inspite of Rajiv’s disinterest, Sonia’s 
 unwillingness
 and then the children, Rahul and Priyanka’s having
 better  things to do. Or lately Supriya following in
 the tradition and footsteps of her father, the
 redoubtable Maratha, Sharad Pawar. Politics
 automatically bestows an armour of invincibility on
 the individual of being beyond the law, at least as
 far as India is concerned.
 www.oheraldo.in
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org