[google-appengine] Re: dev_appserver.py throws SystemError: frexp() result out of range and subsequenty ValueError: bad marshal data
Thanks Nick. I had to reinstall my OS due to a rootkit virus/malware, masquerading as Google update / installer.. http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=39a9c985ba746ec6hl=en (as was the suggested approach mentioned in many forums, that one cannot be very sure of cleaning up such rootkit malwares without leaving open any backdoors) Not sure if the malware replaced any of the binary files which appengine was using during startup (say, for example to check if there is an update available for app-engine, or other operations). Just wanted to share the possible reasons, back on this thread. I have a new setup now and back into development, of course without that old datastore (which had just sample/test data, so no issues). Regards, R.Rajkumar On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi rraj, It's possible you're still pointing to a corrupted datastore. Please try backing up your datastore (if necessary), then running with --clear_datastore and see if that works. -Nick Johnson On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:43 PM, rraj r.rajku...@gmail.com wrote: No, but I gave a different datastore location (using datastore_path and history_path, as shown in the trace snippet) which I thought was equivalent enough - is it not ?! Regards, R.Rajkumar On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi rraj, Have you tried clearing your datastore? -Nick Johnson On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:07 AM, rraj r.rajku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Had anybody encountered the following error and can guide me on how you fixed it ? When running the development app server, initial run throws SystemError: frexp() result out of range... C:\Program Files\Google\google_appenginedev_appserver.py --datastore_path=C:\gae_data --history_path=C:\gae_data demos\guestbook Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\dev_appserver.py, line 60, in module run_file(__file__, globals()) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\dev_appserver.py, line 57, in run_file execfile(script_path, globals_) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 483, in module sys.exit(main(sys.argv)) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 400, in main SetGlobals() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 86, in SetGlobals from google.appengine.tools import dev_appserver File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver.py, line 86, in module from google.appengine.api import datastore_file_stub File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\api\datastore_file_stub.py, line 38, in module import datetime SystemError: frexp() result out of range Subsequent attempts to run applications, throws ValueError: bad marshal data... C:\Program Files\Google\google_appenginedev_appserver.py --datastore_path=C:\gae_data --history_path=C:\gae_data demos\guestbook Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\dev_appserver.py, line 60, in module run_file(__file__, globals()) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\dev_appserver.py, line 57, in run_file execfile(script_path, globals_) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 483, in module sys.exit(main(sys.argv)) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 400, in main SetGlobals() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver_main.py, line 86, in SetGlobals from google.appengine.tools import dev_appserver File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver.py, line 86, in module from google.appengine.api import datastore_file_stub ValueError: bad marshal data Python Version :: Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit Intel)] on win32 GAE Version : 1.2.3 (GoogleAppEngine_1.2.3.msi) Was running the application with an earlier version of GAE (1.2.2/1.2.1), when I encountered the bad marshal data problem during a restart of my application. Tried moving to the latest version to see if this has been handled. Removing the datastore_file_stub.pyc and running again reproduces the problem in the same sequence : frexp() result out of range followed by bad marshal data. Tried moving to Python 2.6.2 - did not help. Tried repairing GAE 1.2.3 - did not help. Uninstalled Python 2.6.2, Python 2.5.2 GAE and then installed Python 2.5.2 and GAE 1.2.3 again and tested with demo application and new data-store path, when I got the above traces. Not able to run any GAE apps
[google-appengine] Re: : full-text search for app-engine-patch/Django
One happy customer here (probably one of the first :) ) Impressive work from Waldemar and Thomas! I'm going to play with gae-search over the weekend. I might use it to let people search version banners my nkill gae project. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Too Many Versions (403)
I'm getting the following error. I only have 1 version of the app. According to Quota Details, my Deployments are only 28 of 250 (11%). My application name is 'launchset'. Deploying new version. 2009-06-25 23:50:52,071 ERROR appcfg.py:1241 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1234, in DoUpload self.Commit() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1106, in Commit self.Deploy() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1134, in Deploy version=self.version) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appengin e_rpc.py, line 344, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth(req, response) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too Many Versions (403) The application already has the maximum number of versions. --- end server output --- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Bucket Size example ?
Thank you for this explanation ! Another point, if I've only 1 task in the queue and my bucket_size = 10. This task may be never be triggered if there is no new task ? The system is waiting for 9 new tasks ? Regards. On 26 juin, 01:15, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote: Hi Sylvain, Great question! The bucket sized is intended to allow you to regulate bursts of incoming task executions. For example, if you set the bucket size to 1, only one task in the queue can be started at a time. If the task queues quota bucket is empty, no new tasks for the queue will be started. This differs slightly from rate (as noted in the docs): http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/queue.html#Queue_... A high rate with a small bucket size means that new tasks will be executed quickly when the queue is empty, but only a small number of tasks will be started at once. So you could intentionally cause the queue to grow longer when lots of new tasks are being added to spread out your task execution more evenly. Cheers, Jeff Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I don't really understand the bucket_size parameter in the task config yaml. Is it possible de have an example ? For example, I've 100 tasks in the queue. (rate 1/s) What does it change if my bucket_size = 1 or 10 ? and if I have only 5 tasks ? (rate 1/s) What does it change if my bucket_size = 1 or 10 ? Thank you Regards --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: moving data from google app engine
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/remote_api.html Or even http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html#Creating_Exporter_Classes On 25/06/2009, Ilya Biryukov mobiled...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I am developing a new application and thinking about using google app engine. My question is that if my app becomes too popular and I grow outside the available (billable) resources, is there any way to move my data off google engine? Can I just export everything to mysql, for example. Or any other convertible format? Thank you. -- Barry - www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: What is the limit on the size of data that can be stored in memcache?
On 26/06/2009, Khai khaitd...@gmail.com wrote: With traditional memache, we can cache data upto 1M in size. Is this the same for GAE? Yes. (Most GAE API's have a 1Mb limit) Thanks! Khai -- Barry - www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Is there a way to get entities with empty list property
Hi Khai, Due to the way entities are indexed, there's no way to query directly for entities with empty lists. Your best option is to add a BooleanProperty that you set to True whenever the ListProperty is empty, and query on that. -Nick Johnson On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Khaikhaitd...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model: class BlogEntry(db.Model): content = db.TextProperty() tags = db.StringListProperty() To fetch entries that had been tagged with 'Math', I would write a GQL: BlogEntry.gql(WHERE tags = :tag, tag = Math) How can I fetch entries that had not been tagged? -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: bugs in index?
Hi buger,
Is this in production, or on the dev_appserver? In production, your
app does not appear to have the necessary indexes to execute the
second query.
-Nick Johnson
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:38 PM, bugerleons...@gmail.com wrote:
SELECT * FROM Video WHERE artist = Key
('ag9tdXNpY3ZpZGVvYnVnZXJyFwsSBkFydGlzdCILYXNpZ3VyIHLDs3MM') AND
status = 2
This query gives me 4 results
But this gives only 1 result!, i'm just added order
SELECT * FROM Video WHERE artist = Key
('ag9tdXNpY3ZpZGVvYnVnZXJyFwsSBkFydGlzdCILYXNpZ3VyIHLDs3MM') AND
status = 2 ORDER BY created_at desc
created_at is DateTime property, and all this objects have it
--
Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer
Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration
Number: 368047
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Time zone in admin console
Thanks Nick. I went looking and discovered the issue tracking system, and I believe this is already logged: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=822 So I guess I'll wait :) Thanks for your reply. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Testing GAE application best practices
On Jun 25, 11:19 pm, Michelschr michels...@gmail.com wrote: On my side, following your suggestion, I tried nose-gae. It seems to work with webapp... Then I tried it with:http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/which is a sample application using django maintained by Guido van Rossum. Unfortunately, the unit tests are still on the TODO list, and alone, I was not able to make it work! (problems with 'application' and imports like 'use_library' to choose the new django version...) Even with an older version of Rietveld (to by pass the django version problem) I add problems. If you already mention Django, you should also mention app-engine- patch which provides full unit test support: http://code.google.com/p/app-engine-patch/ AFAIK, someone also got nose working on it, though I haven't had time to test it, yet. Bye, Waldemar Kornewald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Time zone in admin console
Would be nice if we can select a timezone to display from a drop-down. Am also tired to do -8 all the time. - Alex On Jun 26, 12:00 pm, dburns drrnb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Nick. I went looking and discovered the issue tracking system, and I believe this is already logged: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=822 So I guess I'll wait :) Thanks for your reply. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Bucket Size example ?
On Jun 26, 4:13 am, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for this explanation ! Another point, if I've only 1 task in the queue and my bucket_size = 10. This task may be never be triggered if there is no new task ? The system is waiting for 9 new tasks ? The bucket size is the maximum number of tasks that will be started at once, not the minimum. If the number of tasks is less than the bucket size, you should expect the tasks to all get run when your rate calls for them to run. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: moving data from google app engine
Not easily, Google's BigTable is not a relational database like mysql and most popular databases. If it becomes that popular you would have to completely rewrite the application. However if you optimize your app and it's not terribly inefficient you'll probably be happy with Google's pricing. Google estimates a well coded website can handle 5 million page views a month within the free quota limits. On Jun 25, 12:31 pm, Ilya Biryukov mobiled...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I am developing a new application and thinking about using google app engine. My question is that if my app becomes too popular and I grow outside the available (billable) resources, is there any way to move my data off google engine? Can I just export everything to mysql, for example. Or any other convertible format? Thank you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Transactionally updating multiple entities over 1MB
Hey guys and girls, I've got a situation where I'd have to transactionally update multiple entities which would cumulatively be greater than the 1MB datastore API limit... is there a decent solution for this? For example, let's say that I start off with entities E1, E2, E3 which are all about 400kb each. All the entities are specific to a given User. I grab them all on a remote node and do some calculations on them to yield new computed entities E1', E2', and E3'. Any failure of the remote node or the datastore is recoverable except when the remote node tries to *update* the datastore... in that situation, it'd have to batch the update into 2 separate .put() calls to overcome the 1MB limit. And should the remote node die after the first put(), we have a messy situation =) My solution at the moment is to: 1. Create a UserRecord entity which has a 'version' attribute corresponding to the latest versions of the related entities for any given User. 2. Add a 'version' attribute to all the entities. 3. Whenever the remote node creates the computed new set of entities, it creates them all with a new version number -- applying the same version for all the entities in the same transaction. 4. These new entities are actually .put() as totally separate and new entities, i.e. they do not overwrite the old entities. 5. Once a remote node successfully writes new versions of all the entities relating to a User, it updates the UserRecord with the latest version number. 6. From the remote node, delete all Entities related to a User which don't have the latest version number. 7. Have a background thread check and do deletions of invalid versions in case a remote node had died whilst doing step 4, 5 or 6... I've skipped out the complications caused by multiple remote nodes working on data relating to the same User -- but, overall, the approach is pretty much the same. Now, the advantage of this approach (as far as I can see) is that data relating to a User is never *lost*. That is, data is never lost before there is valid data to replace it. However, the disadvantage is that for (unknown) periods of time, there would be duplicate data sets for a given User... All of which is caused by the fact that the datastore calls cannot exceed 1MB. =( So queries will yield duplicate data -- gah!! Is there a better approach to try at all? Thanks! -- love, tav plex:espians/tav | t...@espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369 http://tav.espians.com | http://twitter.com/tav | skype:tavespian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] HELP,I can't upload files
why I can't upload files? Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. 2009-06-26 18:13:36,546 ERROR appcfg.py:1334 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Error 403: --- begin server output --- You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'simple-ajax- chat'). --- end server output --- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Are datastore queries secure?
Can the queries of my google app to the datastore be sniffed by anybody? Or is the transfer encrypted? Please confirm whether both the request and the response are safe from being read by anybody (except for google employees, of course). Another question related to security: The FAQ says Google App Engine allows you to serve SSL (HTTPS) traffic through your appspot.com domain. Does this imply that I cannot use SSL if I map my google app to a different domain? Thanks Diego --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Error 500 on first upload
Hi, I have been happily developing with the SDK, and on my first upload I hit this error (appId is twitsup): Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. Cloning 1 static file. Cloning 20 application files. Deploying new version. 2009-06-26 15:14:10,523 ERROR appcfg.py:1272 An unexpected error occurred. Aborting. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/alex/projects/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/ appcfg.py, line 1265, in DoUpload self.Commit() File /home/alex/projects/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/ appcfg.py, line 1137, in Commit self.Deploy() File /home/alex/projects/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/ appcfg.py, line 1165, in Deploy version=self.version) File /home/alex/projects/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/ appengine_rpc.py, line 344, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File /usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth(req, response) File /usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File /usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File /usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File /usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error Rolling back the update. Error 500: --- begin server output --- Server Error (500) A server error has occurred. --- end server output --- Any idea? Thanks, Alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Deserialization Cost of ListProperty
I was recently watching a Google I/O video (I believe it was by Brett Slatkin), and I noticed that he was trying to avert the Deserialization Cost of ListProperties. I was wondering how bad that cost is, and how big the list has to be in order to see that cost? (e.g. let's say I know the list will contain a maximum of 75. Would that be something to worry about?) Thanks, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Transactionally updating multiple entities over 1MB
Hi tav, Batch puts aren't transactional unless all the entities are in the same entity group. Transactions, however, _are_ transactional, and the 1MB limit applies only to single API calls, so you can make multiple puts to the same entity group in a transaction. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, tavt...@espians.com wrote: Hey guys and girls, I've got a situation where I'd have to transactionally update multiple entities which would cumulatively be greater than the 1MB datastore API limit... is there a decent solution for this? For example, let's say that I start off with entities E1, E2, E3 which are all about 400kb each. All the entities are specific to a given User. I grab them all on a remote node and do some calculations on them to yield new computed entities E1', E2', and E3'. Any failure of the remote node or the datastore is recoverable except when the remote node tries to *update* the datastore... in that situation, it'd have to batch the update into 2 separate .put() calls to overcome the 1MB limit. And should the remote node die after the first put(), we have a messy situation =) My solution at the moment is to: 1. Create a UserRecord entity which has a 'version' attribute corresponding to the latest versions of the related entities for any given User. 2. Add a 'version' attribute to all the entities. 3. Whenever the remote node creates the computed new set of entities, it creates them all with a new version number -- applying the same version for all the entities in the same transaction. 4. These new entities are actually .put() as totally separate and new entities, i.e. they do not overwrite the old entities. 5. Once a remote node successfully writes new versions of all the entities relating to a User, it updates the UserRecord with the latest version number. 6. From the remote node, delete all Entities related to a User which don't have the latest version number. 7. Have a background thread check and do deletions of invalid versions in case a remote node had died whilst doing step 4, 5 or 6... I've skipped out the complications caused by multiple remote nodes working on data relating to the same User -- but, overall, the approach is pretty much the same. Now, the advantage of this approach (as far as I can see) is that data relating to a User is never *lost*. That is, data is never lost before there is valid data to replace it. However, the disadvantage is that for (unknown) periods of time, there would be duplicate data sets for a given User... All of which is caused by the fact that the datastore calls cannot exceed 1MB. =( So queries will yield duplicate data -- gah!! Is there a better approach to try at all? Thanks! -- love, tav plex:espians/tav | t...@espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369 http://tav.espians.com | http://twitter.com/tav | skype:tavespian -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Testing GAE application best practices
Still testing the test tools... [My tests with the 'older' version of Rietveld was not significant, this version was unfortunately based on django 1.1...] GaeUnit seems to work for simple test on Rietveld... More later... To make justice to App Engine Patch, I should say that I was able to have access to the Django test framework with AEP, including the Django test client and test coverage reports (you can see other post about this subject...) In the GaeUnit doc, I read: GAEUnit for Django is an Django app. So it can be installed like other app into any Django framework based on Google App Engine, such as app-engine-patch and Google App Engine Helper. Well, if I use AEP, I don't need so much GaeUnit... So I will test now the integration in Rietveld... On Jun 26, 1:44 pm, Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@gmail.com wrote: If you already mention Django, you should also mention app-engine- patch which provides full unit test support:http://code.google.com/p/app-engine-patch/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: moving data from google app engine
Hi Ilya, You can extract your data using remote_api, the bulk downloader, or your own code. As far as hosting it off App Engine goes, changing your app to use a relational database like MySQL will probably require some work. There are alternative App Engine datastores, however, like BDBDatastore (my own project): http://arachnid.github.com/bdbdatastore/ -Nick Johnson On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ilya Biryukovmobiled...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I am developing a new application and thinking about using google app engine. My question is that if my app becomes too popular and I grow outside the available (billable) resources, is there any way to move my data off google engine? Can I just export everything to mysql, for example. Or any other convertible format? Thank you. -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Are datastore queries secure?
Hi Diego, On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Diego G.diegogr...@ymail.com wrote: Can the queries of my google app to the datastore be sniffed by anybody? Or is the transfer encrypted? Please confirm whether both the request and the response are safe from being read by anybody (except for google employees, of course). The queries between your app and the datastore only travel over Google's internal network; there's no opportunity for anyone else to get hold of them. The queries between you and your app, however, travel in the clear unless you're using SSL. If you're using remote_api, which uses HTTP, queries travel in the clear by default, but you can instruct it to use HTTPS. Another question related to security: The FAQ says Google App Engine allows you to serve SSL (HTTPS) traffic through your appspot.com domain. Does this imply that I cannot use SSL if I map my google app to a different domain? Correct. Due to the way SSL works, it's not practical to enable SSL on mapped domains. -Nick Johnson Thanks Diego -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Deserialization Cost of ListProperty
Hi MajorProgramming, Deserializing ListProperties can be expensive - nearly equivalent to the cost of deserializing an equivalent number of non-list properties. For exact performance details, I would recommend benchmarking it. A list of size 75 may or may not be problematic, depending on your application. Also bear in mind that every entry in a ListProperty corresponds to an index entry (unless you marked it as indexed=False), which increases overhead when doing a put(). -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:27 PM, MajorProgammingsefira...@gmail.com wrote: I was recently watching a Google I/O video (I believe it was by Brett Slatkin), and I noticed that he was trying to avert the Deserialization Cost of ListProperties. I was wondering how bad that cost is, and how big the list has to be in order to see that cost? (e.g. let's say I know the list will contain a maximum of 75. Would that be something to worry about?) Thanks, -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: HELP,I can't upload files
The user you're authenticating as does not have permission to update the app simple-ajax-chat. Make sure the user you're authenticating as is an admin of the app, and that you're entering the password correctly. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Bill Hsubill...@126.com wrote: why I can't upload files? Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. 2009-06-26 18:13:36,546 ERROR appcfg.py:1334 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Error 403: --- begin server output --- You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'simple-ajax- chat'). --- end server output --- -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: HELP,I can't upload files
Hi Bill Did you update the app.yaml file so its pointed to an app-space you control? On Jun 26, 8:34 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: The user you're authenticating as does not have permission to update the app simple-ajax-chat. Make sure the user you're authenticating as is an admin of the app, and that you're entering the password correctly. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Bill Hsubill...@126.com wrote: why I can't upload files? Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. 2009-06-26 18:13:36,546 ERROR appcfg.py:1334 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Error 403: --- begin server output --- You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'simple-ajax- chat'). --- end server output --- -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Transactionally updating multiple entities over 1MB
the 1MB limit applies only to single API calls Does that mean that db.put((e1, e2, e3,)) where all of the entities are 500kb will fail? Where are limits on the total size per call documented? http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/overview.html#Quotas_and_Limits only mentions a limit on the size of individual entities and the total number of entities for batch methods. The batch method documentation (http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/functions.html and http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/memcache/functions.html) does not mention any limits. Is there a documented limit on the number of entities per memcache call? BTW - There is a typo in http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/memcache/overview.html#Quotas_and_Limits. It says In addition to quotas, the following limits apply to the use of the Mail service: instead of Memcache service On Jun 26, 7:28 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi tav, Batch puts aren't transactional unless all the entities are in the same entity group. Transactions, however, _are_ transactional, and the 1MB limit applies only to single API calls, so you can make multiple puts to the same entity group in a transaction. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, tavt...@espians.com wrote: Hey guys and girls, I've got a situation where I'd have to transactionally update multiple entities which would cumulatively be greater than the 1MB datastore API limit... is there a decent solution for this? For example, let's say that I start off with entities E1, E2, E3 which are all about 400kb each. All the entities are specific to a given User. I grab them all on a remote node and do some calculations on them to yield new computed entities E1', E2', and E3'. Any failure of the remote node or the datastore is recoverable except when the remote node tries to *update* the datastore... in that situation, it'd have to batch the update into 2 separate .put() calls to overcome the 1MB limit. And should the remote node die after the first put(), we have a messy situation =) My solution at the moment is to: 1. Create a UserRecord entity which has a 'version' attribute corresponding to the latest versions of the related entities for any given User. 2. Add a 'version' attribute to all the entities. 3. Whenever the remote node creates the computed new set of entities, it creates them all with a new version number -- applying the same version for all the entities in the same transaction. 4. These new entities are actually .put() as totally separate and new entities, i.e. they do not overwrite the old entities. 5. Once a remote node successfully writes new versions of all the entities relating to a User, it updates the UserRecord with the latest version number. 6. From the remote node, delete all Entities related to a User which don't have the latest version number. 7. Have a background thread check and do deletions of invalid versions in case a remote node had died whilst doing step 4, 5 or 6... I've skipped out the complications caused by multiple remote nodes working on data relating to the same User -- but, overall, the approach is pretty much the same. Now, the advantage of this approach (as far as I can see) is that data relating to a User is never *lost*. That is, data is never lost before there is valid data to replace it. However, the disadvantage is that for (unknown) periods of time, there would be duplicate data sets for a given User... All of which is caused by the fact that the datastore calls cannot exceed 1MB. =( So queries will yield duplicate data -- gah!! Is there a better approach to try at all? Thanks! -- love, tav plex:espians/tav | t...@espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369 http://tav.espians.com|http://twitter.com/tav| skype:tavespian -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Transactionally updating multiple entities over 1MB
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: the 1MB limit applies only to single API calls Does that mean that db.put((e1, e2, e3,)) where all of the entities are 500kb will fail? Yes. Where are limits on the total size per call documented? http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/overview.html#Quotas_and_Limits only mentions a limit on the size of individual entities and the total number of entities for batch methods. The batch method documentation (http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/functions.html and http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/memcache/functions.html) does not mention any limits. You're right - we need to improve our documentation in that area. The 1MB limit applies to _all_ API calls. Is there a documented limit on the number of entities per memcache call? No. BTW - There is a typo in http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/memcache/overview.html#Quotas_and_Limits . It says In addition to quotas, the following limits apply to the use of the Mail service: instead of Memcache service Thanks for the heads-up. -Nick Johnson On Jun 26, 7:28 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi tav, Batch puts aren't transactional unless all the entities are in the same entity group. Transactions, however, _are_ transactional, and the 1MB limit applies only to single API calls, so you can make multiple puts to the same entity group in a transaction. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, tavt...@espians.com wrote: Hey guys and girls, I've got a situation where I'd have to transactionally update multiple entities which would cumulatively be greater than the 1MB datastore API limit... is there a decent solution for this? For example, let's say that I start off with entities E1, E2, E3 which are all about 400kb each. All the entities are specific to a given User. I grab them all on a remote node and do some calculations on them to yield new computed entities E1', E2', and E3'. Any failure of the remote node or the datastore is recoverable except when the remote node tries to *update* the datastore... in that situation, it'd have to batch the update into 2 separate .put() calls to overcome the 1MB limit. And should the remote node die after the first put(), we have a messy situation =) My solution at the moment is to: 1. Create a UserRecord entity which has a 'version' attribute corresponding to the latest versions of the related entities for any given User. 2. Add a 'version' attribute to all the entities. 3. Whenever the remote node creates the computed new set of entities, it creates them all with a new version number -- applying the same version for all the entities in the same transaction. 4. These new entities are actually .put() as totally separate and new entities, i.e. they do not overwrite the old entities. 5. Once a remote node successfully writes new versions of all the entities relating to a User, it updates the UserRecord with the latest version number. 6. From the remote node, delete all Entities related to a User which don't have the latest version number. 7. Have a background thread check and do deletions of invalid versions in case a remote node had died whilst doing step 4, 5 or 6... I've skipped out the complications caused by multiple remote nodes working on data relating to the same User -- but, overall, the approach is pretty much the same. Now, the advantage of this approach (as far as I can see) is that data relating to a User is never *lost*. That is, data is never lost before there is valid data to replace it. However, the disadvantage is that for (unknown) periods of time, there would be duplicate data sets for a given User... All of which is caused by the fact that the datastore calls cannot exceed 1MB. =( So queries will yield duplicate data -- gah!! Is there a better approach to try at all? Thanks! -- love, tav plex:espians/tav | t...@espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369 http://tav.espians.com|http://twitter.com/tav|http://twitter.com/tav%7Cskype:tavespian -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
[google-appengine] Re: Task Queue Back-off Times
Hi Tony, At the moment, the back off on a failure is starts at 100ms and from there subsequent failures incur an exponential backoff with a maximum upper bounds. The retry time calculation is one part of the task queue system which we expect to change quite a bit, so please don't rely on this in your design. There is also a congestion control factor which can complicate predictions of when a failed task will be tried again. I'm glad that you asked about this, and we will make sure to better document this in the future. Thank you, Jeff On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Tony fatd...@gmail.com wrote: I've looked through the source in the SDK but I can't find any code relating to the back-off times when tasks fail (I think because the SDK doesn't actually process queues automatically?). Does anyone know what the back-off/retry times are for failed attempts? The documentation says at worst, once a day but I was hoping for something a little more specific. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] custom template loader
Hi. I'm trying add custom templateloader to my google-app .
main.py start with
import os
import random
import string
import sys
import wsgiref.handlers
import datetime
import simplejson
import re
from django.conf import settings
settings.configure(
TEMPLATE_LOADERS=(
'django.template.loaders.filesystem.load_template_source',
'templateloader.load_template_source',
),
)
...
where templateloader.py:
from django.template import TemplateDoesNotExist
def load_template_source(template_name, template_dirs=None):
...
return xxx# e.g. let
xxx===template_name
load_template_source.is_usable = True
Unfortunally it doesn't work. If file-template isn't exists then {%
include xxx%} area remain empty.
But code
self.response.out.write(settings.TEMPLATE_LOADERS)
take: (
'django.template.loaders.filesystem.load_template_source',
'templateloader.load_template_source',
)
Where I'm wrong? I fill my mistake is in using settings.configure().
Can anybody help me?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Too Many Versions (403)
appcfg.py rollback 2009/6/26 dannyr danny...@gmail.com I'm getting the following error. I only have 1 version of the app. According to Quota Details, my Deployments are only 28 of 250 (11%). My application name is 'launchset'. Deploying new version. 2009-06-25 23:50:52,071 ERROR appcfg.py:1241 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1234, in DoUpload self.Commit() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1106, in Commit self.Deploy() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1134, in Deploy version=self.version) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appengin e_rpc.py, line 344, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth(req, response) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too Many Versions (403) The application already has the maximum number of versions. --- end server output --- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Bucket Size example ?
Thank you. Now, everything is ok. Regards. On 26 juin, 16:11, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 26, 4:13 am, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for this explanation ! Another point, if I've only 1 task in the queue and my bucket_size = 10. This task may be never be triggered if there is no new task ? The system is waiting for 9 new tasks ? The bucket size is the maximum number of tasks that will be started at once, not the minimum. If the number of tasks is less than the bucket size, you should expect the tasks to all get run when your rate calls for them to run. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: moving data from google app engine
I like your optimism! On Jun 25, 1:31 pm, Ilya Biryukov mobiled...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I am developing a new application and thinking about using google app engine. My question is that if my app becomes too popular and I grow outside the available (billable) resources, is there any way to move my data off google engine? Can I just export everything to mysql, for example. Or any other convertible format? Thank you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: bugs in index?
It all was in production. And I have right indexes at that moment
(actually had :), when i've done smth wrong with indexes when tried to
fix it, now they marked as error. I tried to vacuum indexed by
instruction, but they marked as error near 20 hours :( )
On Jun 26, 2:26 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi buger,
Is this in production, or on the dev_appserver? In production, your
app does not appear to have the necessary indexes to execute the
second query.
-Nick Johnson
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:38 PM, bugerleons...@gmail.com wrote:
SELECT * FROM Video WHERE artist = Key
('ag9tdXNpY3ZpZGVvYnVnZXJyFwsSBkFydGlzdCILYXNpZ3VyIHLDs3MM') AND
status = 2
This query gives me 4 results
But this gives only 1 result!, i'm just added order
SELECT * FROM Video WHERE artist = Key
('ag9tdXNpY3ZpZGVvYnVnZXJyFwsSBkFydGlzdCILYXNpZ3VyIHLDs3MM') AND
status = 2 ORDER BY created_at desc
created_at is DateTime property, and all this objects have it
--
Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer
Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration
Number: 368047
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Testing GAE application best practices
I had GaeUnit working on Rietveld (à la Guido...), the test:
import unittest
from django.test.client import Client
class Test(unittest.TestCase):
def testDjango(self):
c = Client()
response = c.get('/code')
self.failUnlessEqual(response.status_code, 200)
self.failIf(not ('SERVER' in response.content))
passed, not possible (for me) to 'from django.test import TestCase'
only from unittest.
But it is not out of the box! You should search a lot by yourself...
I will continue to investigate...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Admin Console functionality for Task Queue API
Hi, Just a quick note that I have raised the following feature requests for admin console functionality relating to the Task Queue API - http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1770 - Task Details http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1771 - Task Functions http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1772 - Editing Tasks in the queue http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1773 - Queue Functions http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1774 - Tombstone Functions I figure a lot of this stuff is probably on your agenda anyway, but doesn't hurt. Probably the highest priority from my perspective would be - Clearing a queue and its tombstones - Deleting a task - Deleting a tombstone Cheers, Colin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Too many versions!?!?
PLEASE HELP this is urgent when trying to deploy, I get this error message: Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too Many Versions (403) The application already has the maximum number of versions. --- end server output --- WHAT DOES THAT MEAN I really need to deploy today, it's urgent please please please someone help me I've tried deleting old versions of my app and deploying a new one (changing version id) but nothing... I'm getting desperate!!! I REALLY HAVE TO DEPLOY TODAY thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Too many versions!?!?
How many deployments are you currently using? If you delete a few old ones it will probably let you add a new one. Or you could overwrite an old version and then deploy under that version since it probably takes some time before your quota resets once you reach the max number of versions. See the Deployments in your Quota Details in AppEngine Control Panel. Hope that helps! Stephen On Jun 26, 7:29 pm, manuelaraoz manuelar...@gmail.com wrote: PLEASE HELP this is urgent when trying to deploy, I get this error message: Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too Many Versions (403) The application already has the maximum number of versions. --- end server output --- WHAT DOES THAT MEAN I really need to deploy today, it's urgent please please please someone help me I've tried deleting old versions of my app and deploying a new one (changing version id) but nothing... I'm getting desperate!!! I REALLY HAVE TO DEPLOY TODAY thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Random Datastore Timeouts?
Hi All ... Anyone know why I might be seeing random timeouts from the datastore? I'm inserting a very simple row and I'm the only one using my app ... so almost no load. ex. error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/ __init__.py, line 503, in __call__ handler.post(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps/myautomaticlife/4.334490812902965182/ forecast/views.py, line 164, in post event.put() File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/ __init__.py, line 696, in put return datastore.Put(self._entity) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 166, in Put raise _ToDatastoreError(err) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 2055, in _ToDatastoreError raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail) Timeout Any ideas? Stephen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Random Datastore Timeouts?
Please note that sometimes I don't get any timeout and the exact same put request works fine. Appreciate any assistance you can offer! Stephen On Jun 26, 11:14 pm, Stephen Mayer stephen.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All ... Anyone know why I might be seeing random timeouts from the datastore? I'm inserting a very simple row and I'm the only one using my app ... so almost no load. ex. error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/ __init__.py, line 503, in __call__ handler.post(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps/myautomaticlife/4.334490812902965182/ forecast/views.py, line 164, in post event.put() File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/ __init__.py, line 696, in put return datastore.Put(self._entity) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 166, in Put raise _ToDatastoreError(err) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 2055, in _ToDatastoreError raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail) Timeout Any ideas? Stephen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Random Datastore Timeouts?
Also noticing random errors in the appengine control panel ... Looks like this: Server Error A server error has occurred. On Jun 26, 11:15 pm, Stephen Mayer stephen.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Please note that sometimes I don't get any timeout and the exact same put request works fine. Appreciate any assistance you can offer! Stephen On Jun 26, 11:14 pm, Stephen Mayer stephen.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All ... Anyone know why I might be seeing random timeouts from the datastore? I'm inserting a very simple row and I'm the only one using my app ... so almost no load. ex. error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/ __init__.py, line 503, in __call__ handler.post(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps/myautomaticlife/4.334490812902965182/ forecast/views.py, line 164, in post event.put() File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/ __init__.py, line 696, in put return datastore.Put(self._entity) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 166, in Put raise _ToDatastoreError(err) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 2055, in _ToDatastoreError raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail) Timeout Any ideas? Stephen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Gae is down ?
Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Gae is down ?
Can't upload a new version either: 500 internal server error The dashboard is inaccessible as well. App is slow but works. On Jun 26, 9:55 pm, gg bradjyo...@gmail.com wrote: Seems to be just the admin... On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Gae is down ?
Seems to be just the admin... On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Gae is down ?
I meant dashboard/admin... Also seems like a lot of extra latency for the first load.. Way more than normal On Jun 26, 9:58 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: Can't upload a new version either: 500 internal server error The dashboard is inaccessible as well. App is slow but works. On Jun 26, 9:55 pm, gg bradjyo...@gmail.com wrote: Seems to be just the admin... On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
