[appengine-java] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.persistence.EntityManager.createNamedQuery
That's the output I get when my Spring-injected JPA EntityManager instance calls createNamedQuery method: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.persistence.EntityManager.createNamedQuery(Ljava/lang/ String;Ljava/lang/Class;)Ljavax/persistence/TypedQuery; This is called inside a very tested and absolutely working library (working outside appengine). This happens locally in my computer, and I suppose also when uploaded in GAE. Other methods (persist, merge, remove, find...) work fine. Am I missing something? Any ideas? TIA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: My application works well in eclipse but when I deploy the same code in GAE it shows the following error while opening the homepage
As per your exception* tweet_now* class is not available for JVM. If you have created this class, make sure you have imported it. OR if you are using jar file for this class, make sure you have added the jar file to the class path. Just to clarify- Are you using eclipse to deploy the code in app engine? Thanks, Amit On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:49 AM, hiran.suvrat hiran.suv...@gmail.comwrote: I have a similar problem and the error log is.. Thank you for the help 500 776ms 956cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en- US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.133 Safari/ 534.16,gzip(gfe) 203.110.243.21 - - [30/Mar/2011:14:33:44 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 500 0 - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.133 Safari/534.16,gzip(gfe) sentiment-app.appspot.com ms=777 cpu_ms=957 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.026614 loading_request=1 W 2011-03-30 14:33:44.409 EXCEPTION java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: tweet_now at com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-01e974251f42de3f(Request.java) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:91) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:71) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Holder.doStart(Holder.java:73) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStart(ServletHolder.java: 242) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.java: 685) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context.startContext(Context.java:140) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.java: 1250) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandler.java: 517) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java: 467) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java: 437) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.Server$RpcTask.runInContext(Server.java: 573) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable $1.run(TraceContext.java:448) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext.runInContext(TraceContext.java: 688) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContextNoUnref(TraceContext.java: 326) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContext(TraceContext.java: 318) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $TraceContextRunnable.run(TraceContext.java:446) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor $Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) E 2011-03-30 14:33:44.410 javax.servlet.ServletContext log: unavailable javax.servlet.UnavailableException: tweet_now at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Holder.doStart(Holder.java:79) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStart(ServletHolder.java: 242) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.java: 685) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context.startContext(Context.java:140) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.java: 1250) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandler.java: 517) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java: 467) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.createHandler(AppVersionHandlerMap.java: 191) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.getHandler(AppVersionHandlerMap.java: 168) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.JettyServletEngineAdapter.serviceRequest(JettyServletEngineAdapter.java: 123) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.JavaRuntime.handleRequest(JavaRuntime.java: 261) at com.google.apphosting.base.RuntimePb$EvaluationRuntime $2.handleRequest(RuntimePb.java:9285) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java: 437) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.Server$RpcTask.runInContext(Server.java: 573) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable $1.run(TraceContext.java:448) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext.runInContext(TraceContext.java: 688) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContextNoUnref(TraceContext.java: 326) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContext(TraceContext.java: 318)
[appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Hi Luca,
What's your code for
r.setImage(newImage)
and anything else that might be relevant?
Ian
On Apr 7, 4:25 pm, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ian, I tried using your exact piece of code. Still same results.
The recipe still points to the first image instead of the most
recently added one.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you use transactions?
Instead of your
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
Recipe r = pm.getObjectById(Recipe.class, recKey);
try
{
r.setImage(newImage);
}
finally
{
pm.close();
}
have you tried
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
Transaction tx = pm.currentTransaction();
try
{
tx.begin();
Recipe r = pm.getObjectById(Recipe.class, recKey);
r.setImage(newImage);
tx.commit();
}
finally
{
try
{
if (tx.isActive()) // Because of an exception, say
tx.rollback();
}
finally
{
pm.close();
}
}
On Apr 7, 3:03 pm, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
This is really weird. I cannot find anything on the internet that
could help me. It seems such a simple thing to be editing child
objects and I find it ridiculous that I can't find a solution.
please help
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I would think the Key has relationship information. The thing is
that I'm able to fetch the image for the recipe, so the relationship
is there somehow. It seems as if setImage() isn't enough for the
linkage to update to the latest image.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that's what I would have expected - how else would a recipe ever
retain
which image it is related to? Is the relationship purely stored within
the
key of the Image?
I must admit that without any knowledge of JDO and its relationship
management, I'm just making wild guesses!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Here's the entire piece of code that handles the update. I changed it
to setAvatar() (line 42) and it's on a `MyUser` object instead of a
Recipe, but it's the same thing:
http://codepad.org/qPo2ZyBX
I also update the 'name' of the user, and the update works fine...
just as I said, the object still points to the first image instead of
the one added.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luca,
What's your code for
r.setImage(newImage)
and anything else that might be relevant?
Ian
On Apr 7, 4:25 pm, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ian, I tried using your exact piece of code. Still same results.
The recipe still points to the first image instead of the most
recently added one.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use transactions?
Instead of your
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
Recipe r = pm.getObjectById(Recipe.class, recKey);
try
{
r.setImage(newImage);
}
finally
{
pm.close();
}
have you tried
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
Transaction tx = pm.currentTransaction();
try
{
tx.begin();
Recipe r = pm.getObjectById(Recipe.class, recKey);
r.setImage(newImage);
tx.commit();
}
finally
{
try
{
if (tx.isActive()) // Because of an exception, say
tx.rollback();
}
finally
{
pm.close();
}
}
On Apr 7, 3:03 pm, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
This is really weird. I cannot find anything on the internet that
could help me. It seems such a simple thing to be editing child
objects and I find it ridiculous that I can't find a solution.
please help
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I would think the Key has relationship information. The thing is
that I'm able to fetch the image for the recipe, so the relationship
is there somehow. It seems as if setImage() isn't enough for the
linkage to update to the latest image.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that's what I would have expected - how else would a recipe ever
retain
which image it is related to? Is the relationship purely stored
within the
key of the Image?
I must admit that without any knowledge of JDO and its relationship
management, I'm just making wild guesses!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Can you post the code for your MyUser and the MyImage classes as well? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
The MyUser entity: http://codepad.org/C2qRTTRt and the MyImage entity: http://codepad.org/xR6hhuU8 On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: Can you post the code for your MyUser and the MyImage classes as well? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Hi Luca, My comments, for what they are worth, in ascending order of importance: 1. In your two MyUser public static methods, it might be good practice to close the PersistenceManager instance before returning. 2. For the annotation for persistent entity classes, I use: @PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION, detachable = true) Now, you do not have to do the detachable bit, but I do use the first part (identityType) (unlike in the GAE/J documentation examples) which you do not. 3. Try constructing your MyImage instance within the transaction. This may allow the enhancement magic to work better and the new MyImage instance to be persisted. Cheers, Ian On Apr 8, 10:07 am, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: The MyUser entity: http://codepad.org/C2qRTTRt and the MyImage entity: http://codepad.org/xR6hhuU8 On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: Can you post the code for your MyUser and the MyImage classes as well? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Not receiving E-mail updates
I am no longer receiving E-mail updates for topics that I have set this option. Is anyone else having this problem? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
I've no idea whether it makes any difference, but try changing the following: @Persistent private MyImage avatar; to @Persistent(defaultFetchGroup = true) private MyImage avatar; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Is there any reason you make a new MyImage object? Why can't you just change the MyImage object which already exists in the MyUser object? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Argh! Nothing! I just tried making all changes... nothing.. same results :( It's incredible I can't find any example online that involves editing a child owned entity. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've no idea whether it makes any difference, but try changing the following: @Persistent private MyImage avatar; to @Persistent(defaultFetchGroup = true) private MyImage avatar; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Have you looked at the GAE persistence blog of Max Ross of Google? There are some excellent working examples there... I have found it useful whilst working through my own private JDO nightmare! On Apr 8, 10:49 am, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Argh! Nothing! I just tried making all changes... nothing.. same results :( It's incredible I can't find any example online that involves editing a child owned entity. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've no idea whether it makes any difference, but try changing the following: @Persistent private MyImage avatar; to @Persistent(defaultFetchGroup = true) private MyImage avatar; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: fetching of children JDO
Hi, i didnt have the element
property name=datanucleus.maxFetchDepth value=1/
in the jdoconfig.xml file, but i added it with a value of 2 and it
indeed solved the problem.
I was about to use your suggestion, but since the fecth depth worked,
for now this is all i need!
Thanks alot for your help, you saved me a lot of work!
On Apr 7, 4:13 pm, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem could be due to fetch depth. In my jdoconfig.xml file, I
have
property name=datanucleus.maxFetchDepth value=1/
which is the default value.
I use transactions for my data exchange with the datastore using JDO
for everything except queries which can return entities from more than
one entity group.
What I do is:
· Retrieve or get an instance of A.
· Touch = retrieve the instance of B from A (A.getB()?)
· Touch = retrieve the instance of C from B (B.getC()?)
whilst in the transaction and before detaching. Then you should have
what you need.
What I do (and it's not optimised but it works) is have a generalised
business method like
/**
* For each object in the list supplied, fetches explicitly all
fields
* which represent either persistent objects or lists (of any
object),
* in order to force their loading into the persistent object.
* This method traverses one generation only in each direction.
* (To traverse another generation, a fresh call to the database
* will be needed to yield the relevant object(s) from the correct
* source generation.)
* @param liList The list of persistence objects to be traversed.
*/
private static void fetchChildAndParentFields(ArrayList liList)
{
ListIterator iterList = liList.listIterator();
while (iterList.hasNext())
{
Object obj = iterList.next();
if (obj instanceof User)
{
User user = (User)obj;
ArrayListUserDetails liUserDetails = user.getUserDetails();
if (liUserDetails != null)
liUserDetails.size();
ImageDataTemp idtImageDataTemp = user.getImageDataTemp();
ArrayListCommissionReceived liCommissionsReceived =
user.getCommissionsReceived();
if (liCommissionsReceived != null)
liCommissionsReceived.size();
}
else if ...
...
}
}
which is called within the transaction before detachment. I then know
that I have got the next layer of objects already fetched and ready
for use and abuse.
On Apr 7, 1:19 pm, Neto jpe.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a mistake above: by
I retrieve a A object and than detach it. I can acess the listB field just
fine, but when i try to acess the* working hours*, i get the following
error:
e mean
I retrieve a A object and than detach it. I can acess the listB field just
fine, but when i try to acess the *listC*, i get the following error:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
But editing the existing one is not a good solution. What if I want to insert another object keeping old object remains on datastore? On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Oh! Oh!!! Great idea I will just edit it instead of creating a new one! DUH! thanks so much On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any reason you make a new MyImage object? Why can't you just change the MyImage object which already exists in the MyUser object? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO - Updating a One-to-one child
Oh! Oh!!! Great idea I will just edit it instead of creating a new one! DUH! thanks so much On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any reason you make a new MyImage object? Why can't you just change the MyImage object which already exists in the MyUser object? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: fetching of children JDO
You're welcome.
On Apr 8, 11:40 am, Neto jpe.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i didnt have the element
property name=datanucleus.maxFetchDepth value=1/
in the jdoconfig.xml file, but i added it with a value of 2 and it
indeed solved the problem.
I was about to use your suggestion, but since the fecth depth worked,
for now this is all i need!
Thanks alot for your help, you saved me a lot of work!
On Apr 7, 4:13 pm, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem could be due to fetch depth. In my jdoconfig.xml file, I
have
property name=datanucleus.maxFetchDepth value=1/
which is the default value.
I use transactions for my data exchange with the datastore using JDO
for everything except queries which can return entities from more than
one entity group.
What I do is:
· Retrieve or get an instance of A.
· Touch = retrieve the instance of B from A (A.getB()?)
· Touch = retrieve the instance of C from B (B.getC()?)
whilst in the transaction and before detaching. Then you should have
what you need.
What I do (and it's not optimised but it works) is have a generalised
business method like
/**
* For each object in the list supplied, fetches explicitly all
fields
* which represent either persistent objects or lists (of any
object),
* in order to force their loading into the persistent object.
* This method traverses one generation only in each direction.
* (To traverse another generation, a fresh call to the database
* will be needed to yield the relevant object(s) from the correct
* source generation.)
* @param liList The list of persistence objects to be traversed.
*/
private static void fetchChildAndParentFields(ArrayList liList)
{
ListIterator iterList = liList.listIterator();
while (iterList.hasNext())
{
Object obj = iterList.next();
if (obj instanceof User)
{
User user = (User)obj;
ArrayListUserDetails liUserDetails = user.getUserDetails();
if (liUserDetails != null)
liUserDetails.size();
ImageDataTemp idtImageDataTemp = user.getImageDataTemp();
ArrayListCommissionReceived liCommissionsReceived =
user.getCommissionsReceived();
if (liCommissionsReceived != null)
liCommissionsReceived.size();
}
else if ...
...
}
}
which is called within the transaction before detachment. I then know
that I have got the next layer of objects already fetched and ready
for use and abuse.
On Apr 7, 1:19 pm, Neto jpe.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a mistake above: by
I retrieve a A object and than detach it. I can acess the listB field
just
fine, but when i try to acess the* working hours*, i get the following
error:
e mean
I retrieve a A object and than detach it. I can acess the listB field
just
fine, but when i try to acess the *listC*, i get the following error:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Detecting orphaned blobs in the Blobstore
Hi Didier, I'm not sure if I understand your idea. The get method you pointed is a method of a map that is retrieved by the getUploadedBlobs, from BlobstoreService right? If so, it only make sense to call getUploadedBlobs right after the blobstore redirect the request back to my application (according to the javadoc). Your idea is to store the blobs` keys regardless my form is stored or not? On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, You get the key of your blob via BlobKey blobKey = blobs.get(myFile) (see http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/blobstore/overview.html) So, I would personally store all the myFile ids that I distributed from the server side and in an asynchronous queue task would do to see if the get() above responds with a Key. If yes, you decide with other data if orphaned or not and delete appropriately. regards didier On Apr 7, 8:46 pm, lorenoolive...@gmail.com lorenoolive...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there. One of the features of my application requires the upload of image files along with other data in a form. That is, my entity is composed of both some fileds (text, currency, dates, etc) and an image file. As far as I could see, to deal with the blob store service is a two phase process. In my case, I submit a form with both the image and the remaining data, this post is handled by the blob store service, which stores the image and redirects the request back to my application, with the blob key and the remaining data of the form. But, what happens if, by some reason, the remaining of the post data cannot be persisted by my application? In cases like that, how can I cope with orphaned blobs in the blob store? I took a look at the BlobstoreService API, but could not find any method that lists all the keys of persisted blobs. Actually, I have some ideas for detecting and deleting such orphan blobs, but I'm afraid I can be missing something obvious since I'm still starting with GAE. Any advice in this sense? Loreno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Custom security for servlets
Hi, In what way is it not working? Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re-deploying an application under heavy load... what happens?
Hi, I have a question. How does the deployment process exactly work? What happens if I re-deploy an application or switch to a different, already uploaded version when the application is under heavy load? My guess would be that the requests that are currently running will be finished but no new requests will be received/processed until the deployment is ready. Is this what happens? Also during the deployment process if a new HTTP request arrives, what will the client get? Will it be delayed and executed/served properly? Or will the client get some HTTP error code (something like temporarily unavailable)? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Custom security for servlets
To apply the basic authentication we have to provide role (as I did in Tomcat container). Here google app engine defines only two role a) *. b) admin. I believe Google app engine has customize the BASIC_AUTH to GOOGLE_AUTH. Thats why they have their own role constraint. And in GOOGLE_AUTH it redirects the google login page. So I can't use BASIC_AUTH in my application. Thoughts? On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, In what way is it not working? Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Object Manager has been closed - solution other than detaching
Whenever I query something like
public static MyUser getUserInfo(Key userKey) {
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
MyUser myUser, detached = null;
try {
myUser = pm.getObjectById(MyUser.class, userKey);
pm.detachCopy(myUser.getAvatar()); // little worried about
this, but fixes the error
detached = pm.detachCopy(myUser);
} finally {
pm.close();
}
return detached;
}
before closing the PM I detach the object so that I can use the result
of the query after closing the PM. This works fine, however it becomes
a little crazy when my Objects contain child objects that need to be
detached as well.
Is there a better way of getting information from a query without
having to go through the entire result and detach all the objects?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Unable to delete entities
Ahhh. Thanks Didier! That makes sense, and should have been obvious! -Ben http://www.liink.it http://about.me/benjaminc On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You should try querying them all (so that you don't have to create an invalid query) via a Java program and then check the value of the property once the object is instantiated in order to issue a delete if the prop value is wrong. You may have to do this via chained queued tasks if your data is big. regards didier On Apr 7, 8:53 pm, Ben bencarl...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a strange problem in the app engine data viewer (admin tools). I have entities in my app that have an email property, but the value of email is ''... blank. This is apparently invalid, as when I browse all entities with the email property, I get an error. I then try to query: SELECT * FROM User WHERE email = '' and get the error: email must not be empty. I then try to query in reverse: SELECT * FROM User WHERE email != '' and I can browse the entities with no issues. How can I delete the entities with blank emails, when I cannot query on it being blank? I have a similar issue with URLs. Thanks! -Ben http://www.liink.ithttp://about.me/benjaminc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Infinite redirection loop...
Here is a behavior I don't how to prevent:
- Launching https://anothersocialeconomy.appspot.com/404.html in a
browser displays my (poor) 404 page.
- Launching it with a trailing character (https://
anothersocialeconomy.appspot.com/404.htmll) starts a loop of
redirection with continued appending of 'index.jsp/'! The browser
stops it after 20 redirections with the message 'Error 310
(net::ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS): There were too many redirects.'
This loop is triggered by any incorrect URL :(
My web.xml contains:
welcome-file-list
welcome-fileindex.jsp/welcome-file
/welcome-file-list
and:
error-page
error-code404/error-code
location/404.html/location
/error-page
I've no filter or servlet definition covering the entire path ('/*').
Any suggestion about the issue root cause? Any idea on a fix?
Note that behavior cannot be reproduced in the development
environment.
A+, Dom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Datastore - best way to insert/update a record
Folks, In my GAE datastore, the Users table contains two fields - email addr and counter. Each time a user accesses a specific object, I need to increment the counter. The logic is as follows: 1. SELECT Email, Counter FROM Users Where Email = emailAddr 2. If record not found, create one and set counter value to 1 3. If record found, increment the counter value and save it back. I am wondering what is the best way to achieve this in Java. Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] User API, not logging out properly.
Hi,
I'm having a problem with logging out the user.
I have the following code inside a jsp file, let say located at
http://test.appspot.com/index.jsp
%
UserService userService = UserServiceFactory.getUserService();
if (userService.isUserLoggedIn()) {
User user = userService.getCurrentUser(); %
a href=%= userService.createLogoutURL(request.getRequestURI() +
?domain= + request.getParameter(domain), user.getAuthDomain()) %Sign
out/a
% } else {%
a href=%= userService.createLoginURL(request.getRequestURL() +
?domain= + request.getParameter(domain), null,
request.getParameter(domain), null) %Sign in/a
% } %
I do the following:
1. Go to http://test.appspot.com/index.jsp?domain=mycompany.com for the
first time.
2. click Sign in and it redirect me to the google domain login page.
3. I enter username and password, and click sign-in.
4. I get redirected back to
http://test.appspot.com/index.jsp?domain=mycompany.com.
5. I click Sign out.
The problem is when I click Sign in again, it doesn't redirect me to the
Google domain login page, instead it directly logs me in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Weird 500 Internal Server Error nginx/0.7.67
Hi when I try to send a multipart/form-data post request to one of my servlet I got this wierd error: 500 Internal Server Error nginx/0.7.67 However, when I try to investigate it with server logs, I even can't find any information about that request. What could be possible reasons for this behavior? Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Datastore - best way to insert/update a record
Hi, I guess that you just have to - select how you access the Datastore (JDO/JPA or low-level API or 3rd party package like Objectify) - make an annotated entity Counter with the 2 fields above - code the algo as you say above - you may want to put this code in a task rather than do it directly: if datastore is not available or any other problem in execution, gae will do the retries of your write automatically. regards didier On Apr 8, 9:22 pm, Peter ptr...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, In my GAE datastore, the Users table contains two fields - email addr and counter. Each time a user accesses a specific object, I need to increment the counter. The logic is as follows: 1. SELECT Email, Counter FROM Users Where Email = emailAddr 2. If record not found, create one and set counter value to 1 3. If record found, increment the counter value and save it back. I am wondering what is the best way to achieve this in Java. Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: My application works well in eclipse but when I deploy the same code in GAE it shows the following error while opening the homepage
Hi, Tweet_now is a servlet which i have made. when i run it on the local server it works fine. but after deployment to google app engine server this error occurs. i am using netbeans to create war file but i am not able to deploy it to the server through netbeans. i am using command line to deploy on server. thanks On Apr 8, 12:42 pm, Amit Pandey amit.s...@gmail.com wrote: As per your exception* tweet_now* class is not available for JVM. If you have created this class, make sure you have imported it. OR if you are using jar file for this class, make sure you have added the jar file to the class path. Just to clarify- Are you using eclipse to deploy the code in app engine? Thanks, Amit On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:49 AM, hiran.suvrat hiran.suv...@gmail.comwrote: I have a similar problem and the error log is.. Thank you for the help 500 776ms 956cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en- US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.133 Safari/ 534.16,gzip(gfe) 203.110.243.21 - - [30/Mar/2011:14:33:44 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 500 0 - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.133 Safari/534.16,gzip(gfe) sentiment-app.appspot.com ms=777 cpu_ms=957 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.026614 loading_request=1 W 2011-03-30 14:33:44.409 EXCEPTION java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: tweet_now at com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-01e974251f42de3f(Request.java) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:91) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:71) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Holder.doStart(Holder.java:73) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStart(ServletHolder.java: 242) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.java: 685) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context.startContext(Context.java:140) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.java: 1250) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandler.java: 517) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java: 467) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java: 437) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.Server$RpcTask.runInContext(Server.java: 573) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable $1.run(TraceContext.java:448) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext.runInContext(TraceContext.java: 688) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContextNoUnref(TraceContext.jav a: 326) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContext(TraceContext.java: 318) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext $TraceContextRunnable.run(TraceContext.java:446) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor $Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) E 2011-03-30 14:33:44.410 javax.servlet.ServletContext log: unavailable javax.servlet.UnavailableException: tweet_now at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Holder.doStart(Holder.java:79) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStart(ServletHolder.java: 242) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.java: 685) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context.startContext(Context.java:140) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.java: 1250) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandler.java: 517) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java: 467) at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java: 50) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.createHandler(AppV ersionHandlerMap.java: 191) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.getHandler(AppVers ionHandlerMap.java: 168) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.JettyServletEngineAdapter.serviceReques t(JettyServletEngineAdapter.java: 123) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.JavaRuntime.handleRequest(JavaRuntime.java: 261) at com.google.apphosting.base.RuntimePb$EvaluationRuntime $2.handleRequest(RuntimePb.java:9285) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java: 437)
RE: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range?
I cheated horribly. My app calls a PHP file on another server and the PHP file does a Curl. Was really easy to setup, because I just used the Twitter API PHP example, and added some security on the PHP so that only Appengine could hit it, and only if it new the rotating secret. -brandon From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nischal Shetty Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:42 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range? Sigh :( Long day ahead for me. What proxy did you use? Have you documented your experience (of setting up a proxy) somewhere? Can you point me to something I can use? -N On 8 April 2011 11:08, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Been there, argued with Ev about why this was worth having someone fix, resolved issue using a proxy. Down side is the proxy will likely cost you by the gig transferred and you have to pay the appengine price for traffic as well, so your costs go up, but it resolves the issue. Plus in a world where IP's are now in limited supply buying an IP somewhere is worth doing if you rely on API's from others. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nischal Shetty Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:33 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range? Yes, they aren't whitelisting apps based on id and that sucks. I'm not using the search API, I'm making use of authenticated API calls against each user and it has been working well (my app makes thousands of reqs per hour). There actually is no rate limit on the calls I make (they are posts not get and twitter puts limits on gets). But, the twitter API team said that at times when there are excessive requests, they block these calls as well. I'm guessing there's some other app that is making a lot of post requests that are similar to mine. I don't know how to get over this. Right now I'm trying to move these calls over to some other server, been working on it. But, I love the appengine, I want to be here :( Is there no way you can make my app use some other ip range, that might help. -N On 8 April 2011 10:17, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Nischal, Are you using the search API, or one of the other APIs? The Search API doesn't require authentication, and so is limited by IP range. The most likely explanation is not a single badly behaving app - it's simply that there are a lot of App Engine apps that want to communicate with Twitter. This is a problem with any service that doesn't have dedicated IPs for each customer - and that's only going to get worse with the exhaustion of the IPv4 address space, unfortunately. We provide the App ID in the referer header so services like Twitter can distinguish requests from different apps for the purpose of ratelimiting and abuse detection, but Twitter haven't implemented anything to break apps out on this basis. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:33 AM, nischalshetty nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My app has been facing limit issues with the twitter API and under regular circumstances this should not have happened. I've been in talks with the twitter API team from the last 36 hours and they checked things on their end. They say that the most probable cause is some app on the same ip range as my app which might be making a lot of requests causing my app to be rate limited in the process. I don't know what a quick solution to this is but I might have to move away from appengine because my app is unusable right now. My app has been running from the last 1 year on the appengine and has 200k+ users. I need your help :( My app id is justunfollow . Is there any way you can move it to a different ip range? -Nischal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- -Nischal
Re: [google-appengine] Users service, urlfetch and 2-legged oauth?
Yesh - it's close, but as I think you pointed out on another thread, not the same as api.users - which means kludgy code. It would really make sense to merge users and oauth, they really are the same thing from the service consumer standpoint. I *might* want to know which was used, but 90% of the time, it doesn't matter. The impact here is needing to change the existing app, potentially in unpredictable ways. J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range?
Haha, right now as a quick way to get my app back on it's feet I'm doing the exact same thing! -N On 8 April 2011 12:13, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: I cheated horribly… My app calls a PHP file on another server and the PHP file does a Curl. Was really easy to setup, because I just used the Twitter API PHP example, and added some security on the PHP so that only Appengine could hit it, and only if it new the rotating secret. -brandon *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto: google-appengine@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Nischal Shetty *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:42 PM *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range? Sigh :( Long day ahead for me. What proxy did you use? Have you documented your experience (of setting up a proxy) somewhere? Can you point me to something I can use? -N On 8 April 2011 11:08, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Been there, argued with Ev about why this was worth having someone fix, resolved issue using a proxy. Down side is the proxy will likely cost you by the gig transferred and you have to pay the appengine price for traffic as well, so your costs go up, but it resolves the issue. Plus in a world where IP’s are now in limited supply buying an IP somewhere is worth doing if you rely on API’s from others. *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto: google-appengine@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Nischal Shetty *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:33 PM *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Being rate limited at twitter due to some rogue app on GAE, can u shift my app to different ip range? Yes, they aren't whitelisting apps based on id and that sucks. I'm not using the search API, I'm making use of authenticated API calls against each user and it has been working well (my app makes thousands of reqs per hour). There actually is no rate limit on the calls I make (they are posts not get and twitter puts limits on gets). But, the twitter API team said that at times when there are excessive requests, they block these calls as well. I'm guessing there's some other app that is making a lot of post requests that are similar to mine. I don't know how to get over this. Right now I'm trying to move these calls over to some other server, been working on it. But, I love the appengine, I want to be here :( Is there no way you can make my app use some other ip range, that might help. -N On 8 April 2011 10:17, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Nischal, Are you using the search API, or one of the other APIs? The Search API doesn't require authentication, and so is limited by IP range. The most likely explanation is not a single badly behaving app - it's simply that there are a lot of App Engine apps that want to communicate with Twitter. This is a problem with any service that doesn't have dedicated IPs for each customer - and that's only going to get worse with the exhaustion of the IPv4 address space, unfortunately. We provide the App ID in the referer header so services like Twitter can distinguish requests from different apps for the purpose of ratelimiting and abuse detection, but Twitter haven't implemented anything to break apps out on this basis. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:33 AM, nischalshetty nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My app has been facing limit issues with the twitter API and under regular circumstances this should not have happened. I've been in talks with the twitter API team from the last 36 hours and they checked things on their end. They say that the most probable cause is some app on the same ip range as my app which might be making a lot of requests causing my app to be rate limited in the process. I don't know what a quick solution to this is but I might have to move away from appengine because my app is unusable right now. My app has been running from the last 1 year on the appengine and has 200k+ users. I need your help :( My app id is justunfollow . Is there any way you can move it to a different ip range? -Nischal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: [google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine
I'll admit that I don't understand the maps API to be an authority on this, but the last time I spoke to them, they mentioned some kind of a key you can get a hold of? With this key you can make signed requests that can be whitelisted. Otherwise, you're put into the general pool of IPs and subject to throttling. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO a proxy will complicate things. What about if GAE team gets in touch with maps V3 team and explain to them the issue so may be they can rate limit all GAE originated appls by app id which is a very secure method since app id can't be hacked ? @Joe sorry my api isn't that useful in your case. Regards Nick On Apr 7, 1:06 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Use a Proxy. Then you can come through your own IP-pool. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joe Tyson Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 2:59 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine We are delegating some of that to the client now, but it is far less than ideal. Our client is mobile, so every byte that we send over can end up costing our users money (you would be surprised how sensitive some people are to this). Thanks for the resource, though. I wish country level would be enough information for us :-(. Doing some additional searching around, it looks this issue has been bought up by some other users on the maps forum: http://goo.gl/RyJ9w On Wednesday, April 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, nickmilon wrote: May be you can delegate the geocoding job to the client side using js ? also you can take a look here : http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-countries-and-ip-geocoding... ml Nick ;-) On Apr 6, 7:25 pm, Joe Tyson joety...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, This seems to be more of a problem with the geocoding api than app engine, but I'm unable to get ahold of anyone on that team so I'll post here instead. The new Geocoding API doesn't do any form of url signing or api keys for non-premier accounts and resorts to using IP address to control quotas. Since App Engine uses a shared IP pool, my app gets clumped in the quota limitations of other apps. This must be a somewhat frequent problem for other apps, since 90% of my geocoding attempts get an 'OVER_QUERY_LIMIT' message. These last few days, it has been closer to 100% at 500-600 queries spread out over an 15-20 hours. I'll add that I don't think using a pool of IPs is at all the issue. Any large scale deployment would be hitting the Geocoding API from a pool of IPs, and if the pool were dedicated to a single service, the service would be circumventing the Geocoding API quotas anyway. Is anyone else on the list having this issue? Have you been able to work with the geocoding team to get auth tokens that don't require having a premier account? joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: SDK 1.4.3 has been released!
Do these problems appear only with threadsafe on? Or do they only occur when threadsafe is set to off? Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Sérgio Lopes slo...@gmail.com wrote: Master/Slave. But the exceptions don't seem to be related do datastore. Most errors are with /_ah/warmup requests, and my startup process doesn't touch the datastore. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] How many concurrent channels can GAE handle?
Given that the current quota for Channel creation is 95,040 per day, I'm looking into building a degradation path where I would use polling from the client side after a certain number of concurrent users have been reached. What I'm trying to figure out is where is cut-off point should be. How many concurrent channel connections can GAE handle in a performant manner? At a high level, this is how my app works: 1) Server receives an update from an external source. 2) Server notifies each connected client via the Channel API about this new update. This is currently done in a crude way by looping through all clients and sending the msg via ChannelService.sendMessage(). Given that my site is not very popular right now, it's hard for me to know if GAE's Channel API can handle a large number of concurrent channels. Does anyone have rough numbers or best practices in regards to this? Thanks, J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] __debug__ and assert in prod
Is it possible to disable __debug__ on App Engine so that Python assert statements are not included in production code? http://docs.python.org/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-assert-statement -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] XMPP Service
*main application will not be built on Google App Engine. Can the XMPP Service be used on its own without using the rest of App Engine?* Yes. you can use only the XMPP service. You can look at the quotas of XMPP for app engine here : http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#XMPP Regards NM @ Krypton http://www.kryptonlabs.com On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Justin jbmey...@gmail.com wrote: I'm interested in using the XMPP Service for app to app communication. The main application will not be built on Google App Engine. Can the XMPP Service be used on its own without using the rest of App Engine? How many users can the XMPP Service support? Basically I'm looking for a hosted XMPP Service that can scale to support 100,000s to millions of users. I'm assuming that the Google XMPP services can support this as they are supporting massive scale for GoogleTalk ,etc. Is this support / scale available for third party applications? thanks, -J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
The 3x CPU cost is only for Puts/deletes though isn't it? It's not as if your CPU costs are suddenly going to triple by moving to HR - if a majority of your activity is reads, then the impact is mainly through the increased storage costs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Read XML
Hi all, I want read file xml but not working on GAE. Please demo for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Read XML
This isn't a useful post. Please tell us: 1. What you tried, if anything? 2. What language are you using? 3. ... did you ever do a search? http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=parsing+xml+app+engine Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:13 AM, VHT Corp vht...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I want read file xml but not working on GAE. Please demo for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
Strong consistency is guaranteed if your queries as ancestor queries using
entity groups. Or ... if you write by key and read by key, these will always
be strongly consistent.
The only case in which strong consistency is NOT guaranteed is if you write
an entity, then do a cross entity group query on a property. Example pseudo
code:
deal = {
name: My deal,
cost: 25.00
}
datastore.put(deal)
datastore.query(SELECT from deal where cost = 25.00);
Since you aren't setting an ancestor, this *may* go to a data center that
didn't yet commit the write. Note that this is generally unlikely. A better
way to structure this:
dealFamilySF = {
name: San Francisco Bay Area
}
deal = {
parent: dealFamily,
name: My deal,
cost: 25.00
}
datastore.put(deal)
datastore.query(SELECT from deal where cost = 25.00 AND ancestor IS
dealFamilySF);
This query will be strongly consistent.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Kyle Mulka kyle.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 10:20 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Yes, we'd love to do that at some point in the future - pick a general
area
where your apps would exist, and we'd run them from those nodes. I
suspect
that if we ever did this feature and you wanted to move to a new cluster,
that you would have to run the datastore migration tool (similar to what
it
would take to move from MS - HR), and if you're going to do this, why
not
just move to high replication?
I'm not that worried about running the migration tool. Should I be?
I'm worried about the eventual consistency model of the high
replication datastore. I want a user of our app to be able to create
an object in the datastore and then be able to read it right away.
--
Kyle Mulka
Co-Founder, DealSavant
http://www.dealsavant.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
One more note: we are working on two things for master/slave datastore:
1. Fewer scheduled downtimes
2. Faster downtimes. Downtimes at some point in the future will be on the
order of minutes, not an hour
Note that you will still be exposed to latency spikes.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.comwrote:
Strong consistency is guaranteed if your queries as ancestor queries using
entity groups. Or ... if you write by key and read by key, these will always
be strongly consistent.
The only case in which strong consistency is NOT guaranteed is if you write
an entity, then do a cross entity group query on a property. Example pseudo
code:
deal = {
name: My deal,
cost: 25.00
}
datastore.put(deal)
datastore.query(SELECT from deal where cost = 25.00);
Since you aren't setting an ancestor, this *may* go to a data center that
didn't yet commit the write. Note that this is generally unlikely. A better
way to structure this:
dealFamilySF = {
name: San Francisco Bay Area
}
deal = {
parent: dealFamily,
name: My deal,
cost: 25.00
}
datastore.put(deal)
datastore.query(SELECT from deal where cost = 25.00 AND ancestor IS
dealFamilySF);
This query will be strongly consistent.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Kyle Mulka kyle.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 10:20 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Yes, we'd love to do that at some point in the future - pick a general
area
where your apps would exist, and we'd run them from those nodes. I
suspect
that if we ever did this feature and you wanted to move to a new
cluster,
that you would have to run the datastore migration tool (similar to what
it
would take to move from MS - HR), and if you're going to do this, why
not
just move to high replication?
I'm not that worried about running the migration tool. Should I be?
I'm worried about the eventual consistency model of the high
replication datastore. I want a user of our app to be able to create
an object in the datastore and then be able to read it right away.
--
Kyle Mulka
Co-Founder, DealSavant
http://www.dealsavant.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
I've asked this question before, but haven't had any official answers. What's the expected behaviour of the following on an HR app: 1. Carry out a put and schedule a task in a transaction 2. Commit the transaction 3. In the task, read-by-key for the entity you put in the transaction Should the entity read in the task be the updated entity, or is there a chance that the task is run before the put has been committed fully? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Clarification on appengine-mapreduce
I see on http://code.google.com/p/appengine-mapreduce/wiki/UserGuidePython the following statement under Current Limitations: Only full range scan is supported, i.e. it's impossible to scan a subset of a particular entity kind. Is this because it is technically impossible or just that the functionality hasn't been implemented yet? It would be an awesome feature! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine
Google Maps Premium http://www.google.com/enterprise/earthmaps/maps.html Dev guide for Url signing http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/premier/guide.html On Apr 8, 3:31 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: I'll admit that I don't understand the maps API to be an authority on this, but the last time I spoke to them, they mentioned some kind of a key you can get a hold of? With this key you can make signed requests that can be whitelisted. Otherwise, you're put into the general pool of IPs and subject to throttling. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO a proxy will complicate things. What about if GAE team gets in touch with maps V3 team and explain to them the issue so may be they can rate limit all GAE originated appls by app id which is a very secure method since app id can't be hacked ? @Joe sorry my api isn't that useful in your case. Regards Nick On Apr 7, 1:06 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Use a Proxy. Then you can come through your own IP-pool. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joe Tyson Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 2:59 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine We are delegating some of that to the client now, but it is far less than ideal. Our client is mobile, so every byte that we send over can end up costing our users money (you would be surprised how sensitive some people are to this). Thanks for the resource, though. I wish country level would be enough information for us :-(. Doing some additional searching around, it looks this issue has been bought up by some other users on the maps forum: http://goo.gl/RyJ9w On Wednesday, April 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, nickmilon wrote: May be you can delegate the geocoding job to the client side using js ? also you can take a look here : http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-countries-and-ip-geocoding... ml Nick ;-) On Apr 6, 7:25 pm, Joe Tyson joety...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, This seems to be more of a problem with the geocoding api than app engine, but I'm unable to get ahold of anyone on that team so I'll post here instead. The new Geocoding API doesn't do any form of url signing or api keys for non-premier accounts and resorts to using IP address to control quotas. Since App Engine uses a shared IP pool, my app gets clumped in the quota limitations of other apps. This must be a somewhat frequent problem for other apps, since 90% of my geocoding attempts get an 'OVER_QUERY_LIMIT' message. These last few days, it has been closer to 100% at 500-600 queries spread out over an 15-20 hours. I'll add that I don't think using a pool of IPs is at all the issue. Any large scale deployment would be hitting the Geocoding API from a pool of IPs, and if the pool were dedicated to a single service, the service would be circumventing the Geocoding API quotas anyway. Is anyone else on the list having this issue? Have you been able to work with the geocoding team to get auth tokens that don't require having a premier account? joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
Only the enqueuing of the tasks is transactional. You should expect strong consistency in that situation. The task should not run unless the commit has succeeded. Transactional reads (default read) will wait to make sure the data is the new version before returning. Did you find some documentation that would suggest otherwise? Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've asked this question before, but haven't had any official answers. What's the expected behaviour of the following on an HR app: 1. Carry out a put and schedule a task in a transaction 2. Commit the transaction 3. In the task, read-by-key for the entity you put in the transaction Should the entity read in the task be the updated entity, or is there a chance that the task is run before the put has been committed fully? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Clarification on appengine-mapreduce
The functionality isn't implemented yet. Right now priority #1 is getting reduce out the door. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Dan Dubois uvico...@gmail.com wrote: I see on http://code.google.com/p/appengine-mapreduce/wiki/UserGuidePythonthe following statement under Current Limitations: Only full range scan is supported, i.e. it's impossible to scan a subset of a particular entity kind. Is this because it is technically impossible or just that the functionality hasn't been implemented yet? It would be an awesome feature! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
I've had experience which suggests otherwise :) I'm finding that very occasionally the entity returned by the read-by-key hasn't been updated yet. I've got around it by just re-queuing the task, and the second time around the entity is always in the updated state. I must admit that I was quite surprised it was happening - at first I thought I must not have enqueued in the task in the transaction, but after checking I definitely am. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Clarification on appengine-mapreduce
OK thanks for letting me know. I am certainly looking forward to being able to map over a subset of entities. It'll make my implementation of broadcasting using the Channel API much nicer! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
Is this high replication datastore or master slave? http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/transaction_isolation.html In a Master/Slavehttp://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/overview.html datastore, the entire transaction is almost always completely applied before the commit returns. A request that looks up an updated entity by its key at a time after Milestone A is guaranteed to see the latest version of that entity. The key here is the word almost always. If you do a transactional get by key, it *should* return the most updated entity. All gets in High Replication are, by default, transactional, so interestingly enough, it's more strongly consistent in this regard than master/slave. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've had experience which suggests otherwise :) I'm finding that very occasionally the entity returned by the read-by-key hasn't been updated yet. I've got around it by just re-queuing the task, and the second time around the entity is always in the updated state. I must admit that I was quite surprised it was happening - at first I thought I must not have enqueued in the task in the transaction, but after checking I definitely am. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Clarification on appengine-mapreduce
It just sounds like what you need are long running background tasks. If you expect this to take more than 10 minutes, you can either do task queue chaining with query cursors, or look into one of the pipelining tools: 1. Fantasm: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/fantasm.html 2. Pipeline API: http://code.google.com/p/appengine-pipeline/ Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Dan Dubois uvico...@gmail.com wrote: OK thanks for letting me know. I am certainly looking forward to being able to map over a subset of entities. It'll make my implementation of broadcasting using the Channel API much nicer! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
This is on High Replication. The only time I've seen the same problem on M/S is when I accidentally left the task enqueue out of the transaction. Once I added the enqueue into the transaction on M/S, the problem went away and I haven't seen any re-occurrence. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Can't creat new application
First off, my post of this problem (May 6th) has disappeared from Discussions so I'm posting again. Issue is I have created ONE app. When I try to create a new one I get taken to that once only phone number/SMS confirmation page, which won't accept my input since I've used the number before to create my first app. App Engine DOES accept updates and new versions of the original app but that's it. Google - PLEASE HELP. Developers will make your stuff glow in the skies, but only if you make it possible to advance. Thanx, Rex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Can't creat new application
If you are using a Google Apps login/domain, you should goto http://appengine.google.com/a/yourdomain.com/ On 8 April 2011 15:20, Rex Johnson rex.good...@gmail.com wrote: First off, my post of this problem (May 6th) has disappeared from Discussions so I'm posting again. Issue is I have created ONE app. When I try to create a new one I get taken to that once only phone number/SMS confirmation page, which won't accept my input since I've used the number before to create my first app. App Engine DOES accept updates and new versions of the original app but that's it. Google - PLEASE HELP. Developers will make your stuff glow in the skies, but only if you make it possible to advance. Thanx, Rex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Can't creat new application
Thanx, but I'm using .appspot.com/ :) On Apr 8, 10:20 am, Rex Johnson rex.good...@gmail.com wrote: First off, my post of this problem (May 6th) has disappeared from Discussions so I'm posting again. Issue is I have created ONE app. When I try to create a new one I get taken to that once only phone number/SMS confirmation page, which won't accept my input since I've used the number before to create my first app. App Engine DOES accept updates and new versions of the original app but that's it. Google - PLEASE HELP. Developers will make your stuff glow in the skies, but only if you make it possible to advance. Thanx, Rex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Unit Testing of DAOs locally on App Engine
I am hoping David Chandler can help here as regards his post at
http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/unit-testing-the-appengine-datastore-with-jdo/.
I have added aeftools.jar to my project classpath, but the test keeps
failing with the error:
warning: FAILED: No tests found
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Initially, I added just the 3 classes in com.appenginefan.toolkit.unittests,
as well as appengine-testing.jar to my classpath, but the compiler keeps
reporting a NoClassFound on
com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApiProxyLocalImpl.
Please I need help on this as I really can't query the datastore and
blobstore without a unit test.
Here's my test class:
public class UserEntityJDOTest extends BaseTest {
@Test
public void testFindUserByEmail(String email) {
UserEntityDAOImpl userentityDAO = new UserEntityDAOImpl();
email = t...@gmail.com;
PersistenceManager manager = newPersistenceManager();
// run a query
UserEntity expectedemail = manager.getObjectById(UserEntity.class,
email);
assertEquals(expectedemail, userentityDAO.findUserByEmail(email));
manager.close();
fail(The test case is a prototype.);
}
}
Regards
--
Odeyemi 'Kayode O.
http://www.sinati.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Issue 4603 URLFetch error Could not verify SSL certificate when using development server
I think there was an issue in the 1.4.3 release: For Java: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4823 For Python: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4824 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:03, carride carr...@gmail.com wrote: I know this issue says the problem was resolved, but this does not seem to be my case. Issue says it was resolved in SDK 1.4.2, even though I am using 1.4.3 and experiencing the problem as originally described. To summarize it only happens while running against local development server. When deployed to appspot the problem does not happen. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4603 Calling the java URLFetchService w/HTTPRequest - GET w/HTTPS, and option parameter set to other suggested workaround FetchOptions.Builder.doNotValidateCertificate(). Also have Basic Authentication set in header App Engine SDK 1.4.3 Mac OSX 10.6.6 Eclipse Helios Service Release 2 1.6.0.jdk Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: SDK 1.4.3 has been released!
I disabled threadsafe and AlwaysOn and it got worse. Many 500 errors on instance startups, all with this message: The process handling this request unexpectedly died. This is likely to cause a new process to be used for the next request to your application. (Error code 203) When I re-enabled AlwaysOn, my 3 instances started ok. So I disabled AlwaysOn again to test and, again, many 500 errors on startups. Anyway, I'm moving to HR. I was already planning the move, and from what people says, it seems to be more stable. Thanks On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 04:33, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: Do these problems appear only with threadsafe on? Or do they only occur when threadsafe is set to off? Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Sérgio Lopes slo...@gmail.com wrote: Master/Slave. But the exceptions don't seem to be related do datastore. Most errors are with /_ah/warmup requests, and my startup process doesn't touch the datastore. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How many concurrent channels can GAE handle?
Jamie, I have experience with what you are describing Jamie while I was building an IRC style chat client where multiple user are connected to a chat room. When a user send a message I would loop through each user connected in the channel and send them a message using ChannelService.sendMessage(). This becomes slow as more users connect. Because the Channel API does not scale with this broadcasting pattern, I've changed to a service that specializes in broadcasting called www.pubnub.com PubNub. The design pattern for broadcasting works great with this service. All I need to do is execute one function call with the intended message and every connected user receives this message instantly. On Apr 7, 11:22 am, Jamie ja...@mapstagram.com wrote: Given that the current quota for Channel creation is 95,040 per day, I'm looking into building a degradation path where I would use polling from the client side after a certain number of concurrent users have been reached. What I'm trying to figure out is where is cut-off point should be. How many concurrent channel connections can GAE handle in a performant manner? At a high level, this is how my app works: 1) Server receives an update from an external source. 2) Server notifies each connected client via the Channel API about this new update. This is currently done in a crude way by looping through all clients and sending the msg via ChannelService.sendMessage(). Given that my site is not very popular right now, it's hard for me to know if GAE's Channel API can handle a large number of concurrent channels. Does anyone have rough numbers or best practices in regards to this? Thanks, J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: How many concurrent channels can GAE handle?
Hi Stephen, Out of curiosity, were you simply going through the list one-by-one sending messages? Or, did you implement a more sophisticated fanout strategy? For example, did you break the list into sets of, say, ten users then insert a bunch of tasks to handle the sending? Robert On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 15:33, Stephen Blum blum.step...@gmail.com wrote: Jamie, I have experience with what you are describing Jamie while I was building an IRC style chat client where multiple user are connected to a chat room. When a user send a message I would loop through each user connected in the channel and send them a message using ChannelService.sendMessage(). This becomes slow as more users connect. Because the Channel API does not scale with this broadcasting pattern, I've changed to a service that specializes in broadcasting called www.pubnub.com PubNub. The design pattern for broadcasting works great with this service. All I need to do is execute one function call with the intended message and every connected user receives this message instantly. On Apr 7, 11:22 am, Jamie ja...@mapstagram.com wrote: Given that the current quota for Channel creation is 95,040 per day, I'm looking into building a degradation path where I would use polling from the client side after a certain number of concurrent users have been reached. What I'm trying to figure out is where is cut-off point should be. How many concurrent channel connections can GAE handle in a performant manner? At a high level, this is how my app works: 1) Server receives an update from an external source. 2) Server notifies each connected client via the Channel API about this new update. This is currently done in a crude way by looping through all clients and sending the msg via ChannelService.sendMessage(). Given that my site is not very popular right now, it's hard for me to know if GAE's Channel API can handle a large number of concurrent channels. Does anyone have rough numbers or best practices in regards to this? Thanks, J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
RE: [google-appengine] How many concurrent channels can GAE handle?
What are you doing that you have 95k people a day using your channels? Is it porn? You can tell us. But seriously... Assuming people want to send data to somewhere and not have a channel all to themselves you would have to have something like 250k users a day, on 24/7. If you did something sane you should be able to spread the load and re-use channels as users exit the system. Assuming these users eat, and sleep, and leave the house you should be able to accommodate 1m users on the 95k limit. And that assumes you use a channel per user, not group the channels based on what is going on. -Original Message- From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:22 AM To: Google App Engine Subject: [google-appengine] How many concurrent channels can GAE handle? Given that the current quota for Channel creation is 95,040 per day, I'm looking into building a degradation path where I would use polling from the client side after a certain number of concurrent users have been reached. What I'm trying to figure out is where is cut-off point should be. How many concurrent channel connections can GAE handle in a performant manner? At a high level, this is how my app works: 1) Server receives an update from an external source. 2) Server notifies each connected client via the Channel API about this new update. This is currently done in a crude way by looping through all clients and sending the msg via ChannelService.sendMessage(). Given that my site is not very popular right now, it's hard for me to know if GAE's Channel API can handle a large number of concurrent channels. Does anyone have rough numbers or best practices in regards to this? Thanks, J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Scheduled Downtime Woes
Interesting. Are you using any type of caching strategy, or is this a 'pure' db.get(the_key)? On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 08:30, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've had experience which suggests otherwise :) I'm finding that very occasionally the entity returned by the read-by-key hasn't been updated yet. I've got around it by just re-queuing the task, and the second time around the entity is always in the updated state. I must admit that I was quite surprised it was happening - at first I thought I must not have enqueued in the task in the transaction, but after checking I definitely am. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Channel Listener seems not work
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum to ask.I have implemented Channel
API in my gwt project.It creates token but when i try to open a channel it
doesn't seem to work.In onOpen() method I try to log info on the server that
channel has been opened but it doesn't work.Can anyone have a look and tell
me it is not working.I ran out of ideas.Have really bad time with
implementing channel.There is my code from onModuleLoad( ) [class filesfor
channel,socket and socket listener are from dance,dance robot app]:
private void listenToChannel() {
Window.alert(listen to channel..);
if(cca==null){
cca=(ChatChannelAsync) GWT.create(ChatChannel.class);
((ServiceDefTarget) cca).setServiceEntryPoint(ChatChannel);
}
((ServiceDefTarget) cca).setServiceEntryPoint(ChatChannel);
AsyncCallbackString callback=new AsyncCallbackString(){
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
Window.alert(caught.toString());
}
@Override
public void onSuccess(String result) {
Channel channel=ChannelFactory.createChannel(result);
channel.open(new SocketListener(){
@Override
public void onOpen() {
Logger log=Logger.getLogger(CryptoChat.class.getName());
log.info(channel open);
}
@Override
public void onMessage(String message) {
try {
SerializationStreamReader reader =
pushServiceStreamFactory.createStreamReader(message);
String msg = (String) reader.readString();
int i=message.indexOf(says);
String contact=message.substring(0, i-1);
handleMessage(msg,contact);
} catch (SerializationException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(Unable to deserialize +
message, e);
}
}
});
}
};
cca.createChannel(callback);
}
THANKS FOR ANY HELP!
Ania
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine
@bFlood : Maps Premium is an expensive service used by not public- facing, password protected Web sites, while what we are talking about here is the free Google Maps service, where G is penalizing all Apps running on top of GAE since they have to share the ip addresses pool of GAE ip adresses. @Ikai : what you write applies to old maps (V2) API where you can obtain an application authorization key and applications are rate limited based on this key, although I feel that some kind of ip based limitations exists also. Maps V3 which is the way to go especially for mobile appls, do not require an application key, instead there are rate limitations based just on originating IP addresses, this puts GAE based appls on a disadvantage since we have to share this with all other GAE based appls using the service. Regards Nick On Apr 8, 2:58 pm, bFlood bfl...@spatialdatalogic.com wrote: Google Maps Premiumhttp://www.google.com/enterprise/earthmaps/maps.html Dev guide for Url signinghttp://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/premier/guide.html On Apr 8, 3:31 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: I'll admit that I don't understand the maps API to be an authority on this, but the last time I spoke to them, they mentioned some kind of a key you can get a hold of? With this key you can make signed requests that can be whitelisted. Otherwise, you're put into the general pool of IPs and subject to throttling. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO a proxy will complicate things. What about if GAE team gets in touch with maps V3 team and explain to them the issue so may be they can rate limit all GAE originated appls by app id which is a very secure method since app id can't be hacked ? @Joe sorry my api isn't that useful in your case. Regards Nick On Apr 7, 1:06 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: Use a Proxy. Then you can come through your own IP-pool. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joe Tyson Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 2:59 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine We are delegating some of that to the client now, but it is far less than ideal. Our client is mobile, so every byte that we send over can end up costing our users money (you would be surprised how sensitive some people are to this). Thanks for the resource, though. I wish country level would be enough information for us :-(. Doing some additional searching around, it looks this issue has been bought up by some other users on the maps forum: http://goo.gl/RyJ9w On Wednesday, April 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, nickmilon wrote: May be you can delegate the geocoding job to the client side using js ? also you can take a look here : http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-countries-and-ip-geocoding... ml Nick ;-) On Apr 6, 7:25 pm, Joe Tyson joety...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, This seems to be more of a problem with the geocoding api than app engine, but I'm unable to get ahold of anyone on that team so I'll post here instead. The new Geocoding API doesn't do any form of url signing or api keys for non-premier accounts and resorts to using IP address to control quotas. Since App Engine uses a shared IP pool, my app gets clumped in the quota limitations of other apps. This must be a somewhat frequent problem for other apps, since 90% of my geocoding attempts get an 'OVER_QUERY_LIMIT' message. These last few days, it has been closer to 100% at 500-600 queries spread out over an 15-20 hours. I'll add that I don't think using a pool of IPs is at all the issue. Any large scale deployment would be hitting the Geocoding API from a pool of IPs, and if the pool were dedicated to a single service, the service would be circumventing the Geocoding API quotas anyway. Is anyone else on the list having this issue? Have you been able to work with the geocoding team to get auth tokens that don't require having a premier account? joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine
Re: [google-appengine] Re: HItting query limit using Geocoding API from App Engine
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO a proxy will complicate things. What about if GAE team gets in touch with maps V3 team and explain to them the issue so may be they can rate limit all GAE originated appls by app id which is a very secure method since app id can't be hacked ? Unfortunately this would incentivize the rest of the world to start *adding* GAE headers to work around maps' ratelimits. But combined with knowledge of the IP pool that appengine fetches from, it's a great idea. BTW, a proxy is pretty trivial to set up. And you can use it for other services that have rate issues as well - I've run into several. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Redirect from naked domain preserving full path
I'm having the same problem! I've set (under google apps cpanel DomainSettingsDomains) google apps to redirect mydomain.com to app.mydomain.com (because appengine doesn't allow for naked domains anymore) Then I've set (under google apps cpanel AppEngineServiceSettings) app engine to listen to *.mydomain.com (yes, you can set the * wildcard there now) This worked almost perfectly, but the only thing off is actually the most important: mydomain.com would redirect to app.mydomain.com userinput.mydomain.com would keep the userinput and load my regular app.mydomain.com (as described in my app.yaml, having my app to treat userinput: in Python's webapp framework you can access this with self.request.headers['Host'] ) userinput.mydomain.com/login would keep the url but behave like app.mydomain.com/login (as expected) while still being able to read userinput BUT mydomain.com/login would NOT redirect to app.mydomain.com/login ! it simply redirects to app.mydomain.com ignoring the full path! the problem seems to be the way google redirects my naked domain. it ignores the full path. I guess it's not just me, is it? so you are saying the solution really involves setting everything up on godaddy ? (in my case hostgator. I bought a .to domain, set the NS to my regular hostgator account and setting all DNS settings there.) On Apr 2, 1:13 am, Thomas Wiradikusuma wiradikus...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Giacinto, I'm having exactly the same problem. Can you get into more detail (step-by-step, starting fromhttps://www.google.com/a/cpanel/MYDOMAIN/DomainSettingsDomains probably?) on how you get it done? I understand your post, but I'm afraid I might click/delete the wrong stuff. On Mar 31, 2:31 am, Giacinto decata...@gmail.com wrote: Well, i solved the problem! None of the previous solutions is really the good solution, or better, none is complete. The real problem of the lost request's full path is the google autosetting for wwwredirect! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Users service, urlfetch and 2-legged oauth?
I did a couple quick tests this evening (in Python). I wrote a couple super simple handlers to walk me through the (three-legged) OAuth setup, then stored the token in the datastore. One the provider side I wrote a simple utility function, get_user that return users.get_current_user() if it returned a value, if not it tried oauth.get_current_user(), and finally returned None otherwise. It worked correctly. I have not tried this on an OpenID App yet. Robert On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 02:47, Jan Z/ Hapara jan.zawad...@gmail.com wrote: Yesh - it's close, but as I think you pointed out on another thread, not the same as api.users - which means kludgy code. It would really make sense to merge users and oauth, they really are the same thing from the service consumer standpoint. I *might* want to know which was used, but 90% of the time, it doesn't matter. The impact here is needing to change the existing app, potentially in unpredictable ways. J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Users service, urlfetch and 2-legged oauth?
Just a small follow up, I did some testing with a federated login app. This seems to work fine for Google Accounts. For Google Apps accounts the authentication process appears to happen correctly, but the app does not recognize a user on subsequent requests (even though I do get an access token). If anyone has used the built in OAuth provider with federated login and an Apps account I'd love to know if you needed to do anything differently. Robert On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 23:40, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: I did a couple quick tests this evening (in Python). I wrote a couple super simple handlers to walk me through the (three-legged) OAuth setup, then stored the token in the datastore. One the provider side I wrote a simple utility function, get_user that return users.get_current_user() if it returned a value, if not it tried oauth.get_current_user(), and finally returned None otherwise. It worked correctly. I have not tried this on an OpenID App yet. Robert On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 02:47, Jan Z/ Hapara jan.zawad...@gmail.com wrote: Yesh - it's close, but as I think you pointed out on another thread, not the same as api.users - which means kludgy code. It would really make sense to merge users and oauth, they really are the same thing from the service consumer standpoint. I *might* want to know which was used, but 90% of the time, it doesn't matter. The impact here is needing to change the existing app, potentially in unpredictable ways. J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
