[google-appengine] Process pdf which is stored in the blobstore
Hi, is it possible to read a pdf file which previously has been stored in the blobstore? I would like to get the number of pages and perhaps the word count of the document. With pyPdf this is possible, but how do I let pyPdf read in the blobstore? Thanks for your help! Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Dm6BqGithj0J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Do version changes affect my cron job scheduling?
You let it seem like a well known feature of app engine - but to me it is more or less surprising behaviour, so I would rather call it a bug :) But thanks for your reply, I will then fix my jobs by assigning them to a specific time of the day. On 11 Apr., 17:24, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: It is a 'known fact that the cron job times are reset when you upload a new version. If you tell it every 24 hours and within 24 hours you do another upload no cron job is called. Better is to specify a time of day to run the job every day 00:00 2010/4/11 conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com: I am not sure why that is, but I have the feeling that app engine cron jobs are not totally reliable. I have 3 cron jobs scheduled at every 24 hours but a some days they are run and at some days they are not run at all. And If they are run the time of execution is not predictable (at least for me) - I mean I would expect the jobs to be run around the same time every day...? Could that be related to updates I make to my application? So maybe the scheduler of the jobs is set back to 24 houres if I upload a new version of my app?? Thanks Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Do version changes affect my cron job scheduling?
I am not sure why that is, but I have the feeling that app engine cron jobs are not totally reliable. I have 3 cron jobs scheduled at every 24 hours but a some days they are run and at some days they are not run at all. And If they are run the time of execution is not predictable (at least for me) - I mean I would expect the jobs to be run around the same time every day...? Could that be related to updates I make to my application? So maybe the scheduler of the jobs is set back to 24 houres if I upload a new version of my app?? Thanks Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] How many taks can be created within one request?
How long does it take to create task? In the docs it is suggested to create one task for each email to send out (in case of the mass email scenario). So if I have a list with 10.000 subscribers and I want to inform them all, then I would have to create 10.000 tasks. But how many taks can be created within the limitations of one request without getting timed out? Does here exist a rule of thumb? Thanks! Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How many taks can be created within one request?
Hi Ikai, thanks for your reply. I will look into AppStats for performance measurement. Regarding the optimal solution you suggested I must say that it seems to make the application code verry hard to understand and maintain. I would really like google to drop the timeout restriction for running tasks, so I could create one task which then performs the sending of all mails... this would be much more straight forward! Cheers, Constantin On 6 Apr., 18:57, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: Have you run AppStats yet? It shouldn't take too long, but tasks do have to be stored somewhere, so there is a cost. The optimal solution is likely a hierarchical tree of task creation (1000s, then 100s, then 10s). On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:01 AM, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: How long does it take to create task? In the docs it is suggested to create one task for each email to send out (in case of the mass email scenario). So if I have a list with 10.000 subscribers and I want to inform them all, then I would have to create 10.000 tasks. But how many taks can be created within the limitations of one request without getting timed out? Does here exist a rule of thumb? Thanks! Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Enginehttp://googleappengine.blogspot.com|http://twitter.com/app_engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Does the Request Timout still exist
I searched the docs but didn't find something about the request timout. The last time I read something about (around Feb 09) it it was at max. 30 sec per request. Does this limitation still exist? I mean with the introduction of cron jobs inside GAE this limitation should have been dropped... or are the cron jobs intended to be of very high granularity? If it's the case that requests can run as long as they want, how can one abort requests that are hang up (for example due to a programming mistake)? Cheers, Constantin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Offline?
same for me On 2 Jul., 17:30, bruno.braga bruno.br...@gmail.com wrote: And this is the attempt to open the dashboard: http://lh3.ggpht.com/_A7V9t45pMLU/SkzRNkvwu0I/TE4/zryzVNPq1Ck... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Free Quoata Reduction?
Why didn't they send out a notification about that... don't like it to see that happen, but at least I would like to become informed. The free 5 Mio PI claim from launch last year is now history for sure - at least for my application. Cheers, Constantin On 23 Jun., 09:17, jianwen kenvin.hu...@gmail.com wrote: I also noticed that. The free CPU hours now reduce to 6.50 per day, and Outgoing/Incoming Bandwidth reduce to 1GB per day. On Jun 23, 2:43 pm, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I just looked at the dashboard and saw that nearly one third of my free CPU quoata has been used up for today. How can that be, because my app didn't do significantly more than the other day when I looked last (I guess it was end of last week) Is this a known monitoring issue or was there again a quota adjustment as in february? Cheers, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Free Quoata Reduction?
Ah, ok, then this was the reduction that has beeen announced in februrary. Tx On 23 Jun., 10:04, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: It was announced since many months (here and the blog) http://code.google.com/intl/fr/appengine/docs/quotas.htmlhttp://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-grow-your-app-beyond-... On 23 juin, 09:30, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Why didn't they send out a notification about that... don't like it to see that happen, but at least I would like to become informed. The free 5 Mio PI claim from launch last year is now history for sure - at least for my application. Cheers, Constantin On 23 Jun., 09:17, jianwen kenvin.hu...@gmail.com wrote: I also noticed that. The free CPU hours now reduce to 6.50 per day, and Outgoing/Incoming Bandwidth reduce to 1GB per day. On Jun 23, 2:43 pm, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I just looked at the dashboard and saw that nearly one third of my free CPU quoata has been used up for today. How can that be, because my app didn't do significantly more than the other day when I looked last (I guess it was end of last week) Is this a known monitoring issue or was there again a quota adjustment as in february? Cheers, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] AppEngine and Google Base API
Hello, I am thinkting about using Google Base API to establish keyword based search for my application. After reading through the docs I am pretty sure this could work out quite well :) Does anyone have experience in that field? Is it the right appoach to use Google Base like that (I know that's not the correct syntax): item RelatedMedia keywordsSummer, Sand, Beach, Sea/keywords keyhdk383kadj93ujdkl/key /item I want to query for one or more keywords which would give me matching items. The attribute key is the DataStore key for the actual media object I want to present the user. Furthermore I am confused how to establish authentication so my web application can insert/edit or delete items inside Google Base. If I understand correctly I need to gather a request token via OAuth or AuthSub and use this to to to either make one request or to to gather a session token for some more requests. This makes sense if my application would access personal data like a calendar or docs - but I want to store/retrieve only application data. How can I prevent my application from authenticating all the time? Isn't there something like an application-key to authenticate valid requests (similar to Amazon-Database-Requests). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GAE Team, How does the import cache work? How do we reduce custom django overhead?
I am not quite sure, but it seems to me the zipimport/loading of our app is only a problem in the early evening (Germany)/forenoon PST It's now 8:00 am PST and our app failes serving - just on time as it was the days before. It's not that we get more traffic/less traffic at this time of the day. When accessing our app at this time it is reacting really slow and starts serving 500 errors. After some hours it gets better and approx. 3-4 h later it works like a charm again. Are there backups scripts running at that time of the day?? We are using django 1.0 via app engine patch - btw: great work Waldemar! On 10 Feb., 14:09, Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dan, On Feb 10, 5:05 am, Dan Sanderson dansander...@google.com wrote: As for bundling Django, we plan to upgrade the bundled Django with the next major version of the Python runtime environment. Upgrading Django 0.96 to 1.0 in place does not meet our criteria for a backwards compatible change, and so cannot happen without a major version bump. It's not really a pratical solution to have an unpatched Django release which gets monkey-patched. The django-helper's monkey-patching technique works at a small scale, but if you need the admin interface and the other interesting Django features you have to stay compatible with very specific implementation details (this can even happen for minor features), so even upgrading between API-compatible bugfix releases (Django 1.0 = 1.0.2) could break at least django-helper which means you break a whole website. Thus, you couldn't even provide bugfix releases without introducing a new API version. I can see only two practical options: 1. Remove Django from App Engine and let everyone take care of installing it, manually. That's what most of us already do. We just need a solution for the request timeouts, but maybe they're related to the zipimport bug which finally got identified? 2. Patch Django in-place and bundle the pre-patched version with App Engine, so we get a real Django port. This is only acceptable if you support almost all of Django's features, including the admin interface. Even better, Django 1.2 or 1.3 might come with support for query backends, so it could be possible to provide a backend that makes Django's Model class compatible with App Engine. I've started documenting the high-level changes here:http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AppEngine The discussion is here:http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread... Maybe I missed something. What plan did you have? Bye, Waldemar Kornewald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Again *major* server errors of app engine!
No, I don't understand why the app has problems loading django at some specific times of the day... Today everything seems normal but I don't have a good feeling if the source of the error is not clear and so it may still exist. Maybe someone of google can shed some light into that?? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Again *major* server errors of app engine!
Davel63, are you also using appengine patch? On 8 Feb., 04:48, Devel63 danstic...@gmail.com wrote: We see the same thing, and just converted to Django. Sounds like it may be related to Django. On Feb 7, 11:09 am, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote: No solution - just gathering information. Looking more closely at the logs where the errors occur, the deadline exceeded pops up somewhere while loading and patching django. This started a couple days ago. Maybe it'll go away? Oh well - I'm gonna enjoy the rest of the weekend, and will come back to this on Monday. :) johnP On Feb 7, 10:59 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Yea, I am using appengine patch too and in my logs are a lot deadline exceeded errors which result from request on very simple pages without any datastore operations. But what's the problem? I have the feeling app engine is lagging at this time of the day but that may be a oversimplification... What's your solution to that problem - or are you just igoring it? Constantin On 7 Feb., 19:37, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote: I saw similar issues (with a google-issued, non-customized 500 deadline exceeded error). I'm using appengine patch, and saw a large increase in zipimporter calls. It seemed like a large number of requests were reloading the entire Django environment (and maybe doing so more slowly than usual...) which resulted in periodic deadline exceeded errors on very simple pages. Sound possible? johnP On Feb 7, 9:29 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: It's happening again!! Our site is not accessible but instead showing a google 500 server error page!!! The whole day everything worked normal but in the early evening (Germany/Europe) or forenoon (PST) the serving of the site is broken again - and I definitively didn't change anything today! Yesterday at the same time of the day app engine had the exact same problem:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... What's up with that and where can I report this error so someone at google will look into that? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Again *major* server errors of app engine!
And why occurres the error only at some time of the day? On 8 Feb., 18:21, Mike Wesner m...@konsole.net wrote: I think our app was running into this issue also. We are using our own django and parts of the appengine helper patch. I would see 500 errors, deadlineexceeded but the exception is thrown in the django, helper or pyamf (in our case we use pyamf to process the requests from a flex/flash client) code which was even before any datastore operations or much else ran. The question is. How do you set it up so that django/helper are cached imports? If you import things in main.py (where our main method is) does that keep things in memory? The docs seem to be pretty light on details about how to do this. -Mike On Feb 8, 3:19 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Davel63, are you also using appengine patch? On 8 Feb., 04:48, Devel63 danstic...@gmail.com wrote: We see the same thing, and just converted to Django. Sounds like it may be related to Django. On Feb 7, 11:09 am, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote: No solution - just gathering information. Looking more closely at the logs where the errors occur, the deadline exceeded pops up somewhere while loading and patching django. This started a couple days ago. Maybe it'll go away? Oh well - I'm gonna enjoy the rest of the weekend, and will come back to this on Monday. :) johnP On Feb 7, 10:59 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: Yea, I am using appengine patch too and in my logs are a lot deadline exceeded errors which result from request on very simple pages without any datastore operations. But what's the problem? I have the feeling app engine is lagging at this time of the day but that may be a oversimplification... What's your solution to that problem - or are you just igoring it? Constantin On 7 Feb., 19:37, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote: I saw similar issues (with a google-issued, non-customized 500 deadline exceeded error). I'm using appengine patch, and saw a large increase in zipimporter calls. It seemed like a large number of requests were reloading the entire Django environment (and maybe doing so more slowly than usual...) which resulted in periodic deadline exceeded errors on very simple pages. Sound possible? johnP On Feb 7, 9:29 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: It's happening again!! Our site is not accessible but instead showing a google 500 server error page!!! The whole day everything worked normal but in the early evening (Germany/Europe) or forenoon (PST) the serving of the site is broken again - and I definitively didn't change anything today! Yesterday at the same time of the day app engine had the exact same problem:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... What's up with that and where can I report this error so someone at google will look into that? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App engine problems
This is not the 500 page of our app. The reported problems resulted in a 500 page of the google service. So actually we cannot 'design the app to not do that' :) Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App engine problems
The error report on http://code.google.com/status/appengine/detail/serving/2009/02/06#ae-trust-detail-helloworld-get-latency from yesterday 11:00 am talks about a memcache problem which 'didn't affect the perfomance or uptime of applications' I hope this problem was the reason for the heavy error rate of our application but then this statement is not quite true! But most importantly the problem seems to be solved and everything is back to normal :) Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Again *major* server errors of app engine!
It's happening again!! Our site is not accessible but instead showing a google 500 server error page!!! The whole day everything worked normal but in the early evening (Germany/Europe) or forenoon (PST) the serving of the site is broken again - and I definitively didn't change anything today! Yesterday at the same time of the day app engine had the exact same problem: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/4964daf12c05cd2b What's up with that and where can I report this error so someone at google will look into that? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Again *major* server errors of app engine!
Yea, I am using appengine patch too and in my logs are a lot deadline exceeded errors which result from request on very simple pages without any datastore operations. But what's the problem? I have the feeling app engine is lagging at this time of the day but that may be a oversimplification... What's your solution to that problem - or are you just igoring it? Constantin On 7 Feb., 19:37, johnP j...@thinkwave.com wrote: I saw similar issues (with a google-issued, non-customized 500 deadline exceeded error). I'm using appengine patch, and saw a large increase in zipimporter calls. It seemed like a large number of requests were reloading the entire Django environment (and maybe doing so more slowly than usual...) which resulted in periodic deadline exceeded errors on very simple pages. Sound possible? johnP On Feb 7, 9:29 am, conman constantin.christm...@googlemail.com wrote: It's happening again!! Our site is not accessible but instead showing a google 500 server error page!!! The whole day everything worked normal but in the early evening (Germany/Europe) or forenoon (PST) the serving of the site is broken again - and I definitively didn't change anything today! Yesterday at the same time of the day app engine had the exact same problem:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... What's up with that and where can I report this error so someone at google will look into that? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App engine problems
Hi Marzia, There have been periods this morning with higher than average serving latency, but so far this is all we have seen: I am pretty sure there was something wrong. I am sitting in Europe, maybe that's the reason... But I tested my site multiple times with http://www.hyperspin.com/ which tests site accessibility from multiple locations round the world. Around 8:00 am PST it reported 500 errors from everywhere around the world, sometimes one or two locations worked ok but the next time I tried I got an error again. Now I checked our site again and everything seems quite normal. It's making me nervous that we (or at least I) are experiencing *major* problems and there seems to be no explanation for this. Maybe someone can look into that to make sure it doesn't happen again? Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How-To Do Paging on App Engine
yes, you are right, this is even better :) Tx for the tip! Constantin On 26 Jan., 19:32, ryan ryanb+appeng...@google.com wrote: agreed, that would definitely help prevent multiple created values. using a guid generator would be even better. having said that, paging on created properties like that aren't really necessary now that we have __key__ filters and sort orders: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandinde... they can be used manually, but i've also described a general way to use them to support scalable paging with any query: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] How-To Do Paging on App Engine
I just looked into the artile How-To Do Paging on App Engine in the App Engine archive and I think that the Contributor object seems to me like an overkill for that kind of problem. If you want to prevent multiple 'created' values to be equal you could just append a random number at the end of the 'created' value. This way you can do the pagination as describe in the article while minimizing the propability of multiple entries having the same 'created' value and without having to do this complicated Contributor stuff and the computational expensive user-email-md5 obfuscation. Regards, Constantin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Googe App Engine and Friend Connect...
I amnot quite sure if I unserstand your question but I guess you need to manage your own User Login status which can be triggered by either Google Account Login or by FriendConnect or Facebook Connect or OpenId etc... That way a user would have the possibility to log in via different auth providers and different accounts but link this different logins to one user profile in your application. Hope that helps. On 16 Dez., 03:00, bvelasquez bvelasq...@gmail.com wrote: I added Google's Friend Connect to my GAE application. Now, there are two sign in steps on my site. One to authenticate using GAE users and the other for Friend Connect. This is not desirable and I was wondering if anyone knew of the method for integrating the two so there is only one sign-in. I should be able to pass the Google Authentication through Friend Connect to the GAE application. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: conversion of pricing into page impressions
Ok, I guees I need to specify my question :) Who has a running App Engine application with some amount of daily traffic and can make an assumption about how much he will have to pay if the pricing model kicks in? I need a rough conversion between the page views an application can deliver and the burned ressources - which have to be paid. Thanks! Constantin On 22 Nov., 16:40, conman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I know about the official pricing model for app engine[1], but where I need help is a rough conversion of this values (for example cpu cycles) into served page impressions. I know that this value depends heavily on the application, but what ranges are here to expect? And also I'd like to know which of the pricing variables (cpu, http requests, db storage) is likely to be the most expensive one? Regards,Constantin [1]http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/annc/20080527_google_io.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: conversion of pricing into page impressions
Ah, ok yejun, that doubles my guessing (which was $ 5 for 1 Mio. page views) Any other opinions? On 25 Nov., 12:13, yejun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think 1 million views will roughly cost $10 if each view uses 0.1s cpu and 100k size. On Nov 25, 5:55 am, conman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I guees I need to specify my question :) Who has a running App Engine application with some amount of daily traffic and can make an assumption about how much he will have to pay if the pricing model kicks in? I need a rough conversion between the page views an application can deliver and the burned ressources - which have to be paid. Thanks! Constantin On 22 Nov., 16:40, conman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I know about the official pricing model for app engine[1], but where I need help is a rough conversion of this values (for example cpu cycles) into served page impressions. I know that this value depends heavily on the application, but what ranges are here to expect? And also I'd like to know which of the pricing variables (cpu, http requests, db storage) is likely to be the most expensive one? Regards,Constantin [1]http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/annc/20080527_google_io.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] conversion of pricing into page impressions
Hello, I know about the official pricing model for app engine[1], but where I need help is a rough conversion of this values (for example cpu cycles) into served page impressions. I know that this value depends heavily on the application, but what ranges are here to expect? And also I'd like to know which of the pricing variables (cpu, http requests, db storage) is likely to be the most expensive one? Regards, Constantin [1] http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/annc/20080527_google_io.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
