Re: [google-appengine] change the default logging level of deferred
Hi Takashi, Thank you so much! Another related question is that /_ah/warmup is also using logging.INFO . Since it is introduced in app.yaml, how could I change the logging for warmup? - working On Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:38:21 PM UTC-8, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: import logging from google.appengine.ext import deferred deferred.set_log_level(logging.DEBUG) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/QFY9Zf-QoNgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] change the default logging level of deferred
Dear all, I would like to change the default logging level of deferred from INFO to DEBUG. How could I do it? Thanks a lot! ps, I am using the python27 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/kxR_fXlfKqgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] prospective_search broke since yesterday
Dear All, Since 9/1, all my prospective_search related python code is broken. I don't know why. Is there a API change? Anyone has the same experience? Thanks a lot! coronin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/8EuwSbVDDJYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Incoming Bandwidth over quota / python
Because last the over quota happened at the middle night, I paid close attention today - and it went off after serving only 3 requests... 9 kb... in 3 minutes... Could anyone please give some suggestion? Thanks! 1. 1. 2012-07-31 00:04:28.071 /js?y=0.29361433181115804 503 100ms 0kb 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:04:28 -0700] GET /js?y=0.29361433181115804 HTTP/1.1 503 0 - - paperlink2.appspot.com ms=100 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.40 2. 1. 2012-07-31 00:03:48.053 /js?y=0.4865090114862315 200 68ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:48 -0700] GET /js?y=0.4865090114862315 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=69 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.000473 instance=*00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa* https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=s~paperlink2version_id=peaks27.360632871327433965key=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa#00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa 3. 1. 2012-07-31 00:03:28.231 /js?y=0.5931225973034153 200 188ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:28 -0700] GET /js?y=0.5931225973034153 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=188 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.000477 instance=*00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa* https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=s~paperlink2version_id=peaks27.360632871327433965key=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa#00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa 4. 1. 2012-07-31 00:03:19.859 /js?y=0.5153093388288915 200 4576ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:19 -0700] GET /js?y=0.5153093388288915 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=4576 cpu_ms=957 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.027121 loading_request=1 instance=*00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa* https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=s~paperlink2version_id=peaks27.360632871327433965key=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa#00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa 2. I2012-07-31 00:03:19.859 This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical request for your application. 5. 1. 2012-07-30 23:59:35.503 / 503 56ms 0kb 165.225.134.101 - - [30/Jul/2012:23:59:35 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 503 0 - - paperlink2.appspot.com ms=56 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.20 On Monday, July 30, 2012 1:08:55 AM UTC-7, working wrote: I have a low traffic site at https://paperlink2.appspot.com I enabled the billing over the weekend to tweak the datastore. When it was done, I disabled the billing. Now, I notice my Incoming Bandwidth is over quota. How could that happen? If anyone in the GAE team could have a quick look, I really appreciate~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/zAYMBpjAtswJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Incoming Bandwidth over quota / python
Thanks a lot! It is working now. I thought finishing the billing settings change was the reason the issue disappeared... On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:05:04 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: We've just reset the quota as a bandaid. Please let me know if this happens again. -- Takashi On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Takashi Matsuo wrote: It seems that something wrong is happening on your app. I've escalated this issue to the team. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Takashi On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Takashi Matsuo wrote: I'm going to take a look. On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:59 PM, working wrote: Because last the over quota happened at the middle night, I paid close attention today - and it went off after serving only 3 requests... 9 kb... in 3 minutes... Could anyone please give some suggestion? Thanks! 2012-07-31 00:04:28.071 /js?y=0.29361433181115804 503 100ms 0kb 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:04:28 -0700] GET /js?y=0.29361433181115804 HTTP/1.1 503 0 - - paperlink2.appspot.com ms=100 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.40 2012-07-31 00:03:48.053 /js?y=0.4865090114862315 200 68ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:48 -0700] GET /js?y=0.4865090114862315 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=69 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.000473 instance=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa 2012-07-31 00:03:28.231 /js?y=0.5931225973034153 200 188ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:28 -0700] GET /js?y=0.5931225973034153 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=188 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.000477 instance=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa 2012-07-31 00:03:19.859 /js?y=0.5153093388288915 200 4576ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 213.112.244.168 - - [31/Jul/2012:00:03:19 -0700] GET /js?y=0.5153093388288915 HTTP/1.1 200 3874 - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 paperlink2.appspot.com ms=4576 cpu_ms=957 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.027121 loading_request=1 instance=00c61b117c8c6f5d69c0df046a884b741337aa I2012-07-31 00:03:19.859 This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical request for your application. 2012-07-30 23:59:35.503 / 503 56ms 0kb 165.225.134.101 - - [30/Jul/2012:23:59:35 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 503 0 - - paperlink2.appspot.com ms=56 cpu_ms=0 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.20 On Monday, July 30, 2012 1:08:55 AM UTC-7, working wrote: I have a low traffic site at https://paperlink2.appspot.com I enabled the billing over the weekend to tweak the datastore. When it was done, I disabled the billing. Now, I notice my Incoming Bandwidth is over quota. How could that happen? If anyone in the GAE team could have a quick look, I really appreciate~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/cV1m1WcOwicJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Incoming Bandwidth over quota / python
I have a low traffic site at https://paperlink2.appspot.com I enabled the billing over the weekend to tweak the datastore. When it was done, I disabled the billing. Now, I notice my Incoming Bandwidth is over quota. How could that happen? If anyone in the GAE team could have a quick look, I really appreciate~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/I0N2SnGnNesJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Is the search API ready for python2.7?
When it was in testing, it only supports python 2.5 on HRD. How about now? Thanks~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/SmapHZJhkGIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: 40%+ increase of frontend instance hours over previous day
Hi Brian, The last step of the migration is alias the app over to the HRD app. I am wondering: whether oldapp.appspot.com will be pointed to newapp-hrd.appspot.com? whether old...@appspot.com will be pointed to newapp-...@appspot.com for xmpp? whether postmas...@oldapp.appspotmail.com will be pointed to postmas...@newapp-hrd.appspotmail.com? Do we have to go to Google Apps and manually switch domain names www.oldapp.com to newapp-hrd.appspot.com? Thanks, coronin On Dec 14, 1:32 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Alan Xing alanx...@gmail.com wrote: The dollar cost of HRD and MS are the same? It was a surprise for me. I always had the impression HRD costed way more. Now I could not find that document except from Google search engine snapshot. As of Dec 10, 2011, GAE doc still mentioned HRD uses approximately three times the storage and CPU cost of the master/slave option. Please see attached snapshot. Regardless, I'm very happy to know that HRD is not costing more than MS any more. I will seriously think about to migrate to HRD soon. When HRD was launched it did cost 3x more than MS (since it costs Google at least 3x more to do the replication). But the pricing has later adjusted to be the same as MS. Cheers, Brian As of this moment today, we are still seeing way much higher front end instance hours than I would have expected before yesterday's spike. I'm not convinced by the explanations I have received so far. I'd think it is good to be transparent about pricing. Choosing a platform is a long term relationship, transparency can help stabilize the relationship. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Alan Xing alanx...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, we are still using the M/S datastore. We feel that we are not offering mission critical services. These services don't require the HRD level availability. HRD db read/write/store all costs more. What do you mean? The dollar cost for HRD is the same as MS. I know we could save some CPU hours by using Python 2.7 concurrency feature if we move over to HRD. There is loss and there is gain. Overall, we don't see our cost will reduce by moving M/S to HRD. That is why we are reluctant to make the move. I have always wondered why GAE doesn't extend Python 2.7 support to M/S. It doesn't seem there is any particular technical blocker. Maybe I'm wrong. In this random latency case, I again wonder why GAE doesn't plan to fix for M/S servers. We do have a fix - the HRD :-) Seriously, to make MS more consistent and reliable, you'd need to synchronously replicate the data across machines and data centers and that is exactly what MRD. Cheers, Brian Is the plan to completely phase out M/S servers in some near future? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Kenneth kennet...@aladdinschools.com wrote: Are you using the old MS datastore or the HR datastore? If you're using MS then pretty much anything to do with the datastore is totally random, so expect random latency increases which result in higher instance counts and thus higher cost to you, randomly of course. Google will not be fixing these so move to the hr datastore when you can. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/PsCn4-PDjvUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at
[google-appengine] Asynchronous urlfetch limit?
Hi All, The PUT/POST limit for urlfetch is 8M. But when I do asynchronous request, I continuously get the error (code runs fine with 1M files): The request to API call urlfetch.Fetch() was too large. Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ ext/webapp/_webapp25.py, line 703, in __call__ handler.post(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps//2011.354764050417538199/upload.py, line 121, in post result = rpc.get_result() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/apiproxy_stub_map.py, line 592, in get_result return self.__get_result_hook(self) File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/urlfetch.py, line 355, in _get_fetch_result rpc.check_success() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/apiproxy_stub_map.py, line 558, in check_success self.__rpc.CheckSuccess() File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ api/apiproxy_rpc.py, line 133, in CheckSuccess raise self.exception RequestTooLargeError: The request to API call urlfetch.Fetch() was too large. Any suggestion? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Python 2.7 multithreaded: ereporter mapreduce compatibility
Hi Brian, As for google.appengine.ext.mapreduce.application Does it mean the SDK/runtime already has its mapreduce? Right now, I still supply an additional copy in my app folder. If SDK/runtime already has it, I will delete my own copy. How about the pipeline? Thanks, coronin On Nov 10, 6:10 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote: Hi, What are the plans to get these 2 extensions compatible with Python 2.7 multithreaded? $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/mapreduce/main.py $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/ereporter/report_generator.py I assume that you are seeing an error during the parsing of your appcfg.py file? The error message should say that you can't use a CGI with threadsafe. The solution is to use WSGI in your handlers instead i.e. google.appengine.ext.mapreduce.application google.appengine.ext.ereporter/report_generator.application Cheers, Brian Thanks, - Pol -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: will MS get python2.7?
Does it mean when appengine forces python2.7, MS has to be migrated to HR? How soon will it be? Thanks, coronin On Nov 5, 10:18 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote: Hi coronin, On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:14 PM, working coro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Will MS get python2.7 update? No, Python 2.7 will never support the Master/Slave datastore configuration. Cheers, Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] will MS get python2.7?
Hi All, Will MS get python2.7 update? Tested python2.7 on HR and it is very nice. Thanks, coronin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] what should I do, when the new pricing takes effect?
Hi All, Only the datastore storage is over the free quote. Reported the size of all entities is 283 MBytes. It is a web app for non-commercial usage. Any suggestion on what I should do? Thanks! ResourceUsedFreeBillableCharge Frontend Instance Hours $0.04/Hour 15.52 28.00 0.00 $0.00 Backend Instance Hours $0.08/Hour 0.009.000.00 $0.00 Datastore Storage $0.008/GByte-day 1.941.000.94 $0.01 Blobstore Storage $0.0057/GByte-day0.015.000.00 $0.00 Datastore Writes $1.00/Million Ops0.040.050.00 $0.00 Datastore Reads $0.70/Million Ops0.010.050.00 $0.00 Small Datastore Operations $0.10/Million Ops0.010.050.00 $0.00 Bandwidth In $0.10/GByte 0.011.000.00 $0.00 Bandwidth Out $0.15/GByte 0.011.000.00 $0.00 Emails $0.01/100 Messages 0.041.000.00 $0.00 XMPP Stanzas $0.01/1000 Stanzas 0.001.000.00 $0.00 Opened Channels $0.01/100 Opens 0.001.000.00 $0.00 Total*: $0.01 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: The API call taskqueue.Delete() required more quota than is available?
I got the error this morning. Is there any error code that we can use? Thanks On Jun 3, 4:26 pm, Arvind Raj arvind.raj.na...@gmail.com wrote: I am still getting the error. It is only raised when a delete task is attempted, not a create (bizzare) On Jun 1, 2:53 am, nverne nve...@google.com wrote: After a few investigations, it looks like our systems suffered a short glitch talking to servers enforcing quotas. This all resolved itself fairly quickly. Please let us know if you see this again. Thanks, Nick Verne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] The API call taskqueue.Delete() required more quota than is available?
Dear All, I started getting this error today. The API call taskqueue.Delete() required more quota than is available I only lease_tasks(500). After processing, I want to delete_tasks them. But failed. Any suggestion? The limit for lease_tasks is 1000, and there is no mention about the limit for delete_tasks. I check the dashboard, and I have plenty quota for everything. So strange~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: The API call taskqueue.Delete() required more quota than is available?
Hi Greg, All three Quota are 0% on the console. The app id is thepaperlink. I had the issue between 2011-05-31 18:18:45.861 and 2011-05-31 18:19:44.944. Could you please check the status? Thanks a lot for your time! On May 31, 7:13 pm, Greg Darke (Google) darke+goo...@google.com wrote: Check the value of Task Queue API Calls on the Task Queues page in admin console. Are you exceeding this limit? If not, what is the app id so that I can check why you are getting this error. On 1 June 2011 11:29, working coro...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I started getting this error today. The API call taskqueue.Delete() required more quota than is available I only lease_tasks(500). After processing, I want to delete_tasks them. But failed. Any suggestion? The limit for lease_tasks is 1000, and there is no mention about the limit for delete_tasks. I check the dashboard, and I have plenty quota for everything. So strange~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] cannot change billing settings?
Dear All, From last night, I cannot change the billing settings of one of my apps. The others are fine. Who should I contact for help? No info/hint googled yet~~ Thanks, coronin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Deal Breaker: App not visible in China
which app you are running? mines are fine On Jan 15, 11:53 am, GAEfan ken...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any solution to this, or is this something that Google is working on? Our most recent app has China as an important market. Yet, it appears China is again blocking the Google IP addresses, as our customers cannot get to the site. This is a deal breaker for this and many other apps. Please tell me this will be fixed soon, or propose a solution. Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: migrate to a new app-id
Hi Wim, I endup ported all the data with my code. The urlfetch method on demand is a very interesting one - will try next time :-p Best, Liang On Nov 20, 4:35 am, Wim den Ouden wdenou...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Liang, Wim again, Forgot to say, if a user ask an entity in the new app wich is not there yet, get it via urlfetch and delete in the old app-id and save/ show in the new app-id. Nobody sees the different (may be a little slower tille all entities are in the new datastore) gr wim On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Wim den Ouden wdenou...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Liang, Can't you use taskqueues with urlfetch to fill the new datastore in the background and allready start with the new app-id. No need to stay around for 70 hours etc. gr wim On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:57 PM, working coro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Due to some branding issue, I have to change my app to use a new app- id. The way I know is: 1. download datastore and upload to the new app-id 2. change the app-id in app.yaml. Sounds easy. But, since I have over 120 entities in a kind under the old app-id. If I use bulkuploader to do the downloading/uploading, which does it with a speed of 10 per second, I will need 12 * 2 / 3600 = 66 hours. Too long... Any suggestion? Is there a way to directly port the datastore to a new app-id? Thanks a lot! Best, Liang -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- gr wdo Demo free E-business:https://e-comm.appspot.com Wim den Ouden Gae (cloud) based apps -- gr wdo Demo free E-business:https://e-comm.appspot.com Gae developer tipshttp://code.google.com/p/relat/wiki/gaetips Wim den Ouden Google app engine based (web) apps -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] migrate to a new app-id
Hi all, Due to some branding issue, I have to change my app to use a new app- id. The way I know is: 1. download datastore and upload to the new app-id 2. change the app-id in app.yaml. Sounds easy. But, since I have over 120 entities in a kind under the old app-id. If I use bulkuploader to do the downloading/uploading, which does it with a speed of 10 per second, I will need 12 * 2 / 3600 = 66 hours. Too long... Any suggestion? Is there a way to directly port the datastore to a new app-id? Thanks a lot! Best, Liang -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
