[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0
On 8 Mai, 01:41, little_pea evgeny.demche...@gmail.com wrote: Does enybody know id Django 1.0 support is planned for App Engine? If you want an easy way to use Django 1.0 (and 1.1) you can use app- engine-patch: http://code.google.com/p/app-engine-patch/ Bye, Waldemar Kornewald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0
Hi little_pea, It's not currently on our roadmap, so don't count on it in the near future. You can use Django 1.0 in your App Engine apps, you just have to bundle it and upload it with your app. -Nick Johnson On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:41 AM, little_pea evgeny.demche...@gmail.com wrote: Does enybody know id Django 1.0 support is planned for App Engine? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0
Native django 1.0 may not be on the roadmap, but it is a very popular request. To join that crowd, star http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=872 . On May 8, 1:59 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi little_pea, It's not currently on our roadmap, so don't count on it in the near future. You can use Django 1.0 in your App Engine apps, you just have to bundle it and upload it with your app. -Nick Johnson On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:41 AM, little_pea evgeny.demche...@gmail.com wrote: Does enybody know id Django 1.0 support is planned for App Engine?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0
Note that Django 1.1 is coming soon ( http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/may/07/django-1-1-update/ ) so it would be nice if app engine made the leap. On May 8, 5:33 am, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: Native django 1.0 may not be on the roadmap, but it is a very popular request. To join that crowd, starhttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=872 . On May 8, 1:59 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi little_pea, It's not currently on our roadmap, so don't count on it in the near future. You can use Django 1.0 in your App Engine apps, you just have to bundle it and upload it with your app. -Nick Johnson On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:41 AM, little_pea evgeny.demche...@gmail.com wrote: Does enybody know id Django 1.0 support is planned for App Engine?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 + app-engine-patch
It looks like you really are missing the PIL module. syncdb isn't necessary with app-engine-patch. But, $ python manage.py shell will probably fail with the same error until PIL gets installed. Which platform are you developing on? On Jan 30, 10:44 am, metametagirl metametag...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to start a new app using Django 1.0 with the app-engine- patch. I'm used to using MySQL but I'm new to this datastore. The Django tutorial says to run 'python manage.py syncdb' to create the tables, but this doesn't work for me in my development environment. Is this step necessary when using this combination of technologies (Django 1.0 + app-engine-patch)? Also, how do you invoke the Django admin in the development environment? My understanding is that it won't work once you upload the app to GAE, but that there should be a way to make it work in the dev environment. python manage.py syncdb WARNING:root:Could not read datastore data from /var/folders/bz/ bzgZyG4mE5adBq+imZYFdk+++TI/-Tmp-/django_myapp.datastore WARNING:root:Could not initialize images API; you are likely missing the Python PIL module. ImportError: No module named PIL Unknown command: 'syncdb' Type 'manage.py help' for usage. Thanks in advance, Kelly --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 - any update on plans to replace 0.96 ?
Hi Alex, We are definitely interested in offering Django 1.0 with App Engine in the future. However, it seems likely that including Django 1.0 as the default Django version with App Engine would need to be part of an api version change, since such a change would likely brake existing apps. In terms of the high CPU warnings, we are generally working on a solution that will lesson the affect of such warnings on applications, so we hope we can address this soon not just for this case, but in general. As for the time concern, there isn't much right now that can be done. But as your application increases in popularity, it's more likely people will see an already warm interpreter and thus not have to wait for a new initialization. -Marzia On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Any plans to update Django 0.96 to Django 1.0 ? The 1.0 has been released on Sep 3 and still not there. I use local version of Django 1.0 and it's OK but my concern is performance and CPU usage. Whenever new instance of handler is created by GAE it takes some time and I guess CPU cycles. I've noticed Django loading and appengine_django helper installation takes solid amount of time (~0.8 sec) and I guess CPU cycles. See log extract from main.py : # 12-11 10:42AM 27.040 - Loading django helper... # 12-11 10:42AM 27.862 - Successfully loaded django helper It does not affect my CPU quota but harm user expirience and make me nervous when checking logs in admin console :). I assume if we load Django provided by GAE it will be pre-loaded and thus no CPU/time penalities for app. Is my assumption correct? Would be really great if we could get the Django version 1.0 provided by default. The latest reply on this is http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/c3bb71cd63d8d32f May be we should fill a feature request to speed it up? P.S. I'm wonder what if Django could be provided pre-patched as an option? P.P.S. I know - this is too specific request for general platform as GAE so would be happy to get any advises on speeding up cold requests. For example I already do not load Django if page content found in memcache. Still would prefer to have Django pre-loaded. May be by specifying this in app.yaml? -- Alex http:/sharp-developer.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 - any update on plans to replace 0.96 ?
Thanks Marzia, Have GAE team thought about providing some warm-up url? So if GAE see a load is increasing (and probably could predict a new request handler will be needed soon) then engine calls some URL specified in app.yaml (for example) and a request handler instance created and kept in cache for a while. So we do not waste time when a user request comes? I do not talk about 100% accuracy but some sort of pro-active warming would benefit. May be you could even disable calls to DB/memcache/etc so it is just modules initialization. -- Alex http://sharp-developer.net/ On Dec 12, 6:49 pm, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote: Hi Alex, We are definitely interested in offering Django 1.0 with App Engine in the future. However, it seems likely that including Django 1.0 as the default Django version with App Engine would need to be part of an api version change, since such a change would likely brake existing apps. In terms of the high CPU warnings, we are generally working on a solution that will lesson the affect of such warnings on applications, so we hope we can address this soon not just for this case, but in general. As for the time concern, there isn't much right now that can be done. But as your application increases in popularity, it's more likely people will see an already warm interpreter and thus not have to wait for a new initialization. -Marzia On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Any plans to update Django 0.96 to Django 1.0 ? The 1.0 has been released on Sep 3 and still not there. I use local version of Django 1.0 and it's OK but my concern is performance and CPU usage. Whenever new instance of handler is created by GAE it takes some time and I guess CPU cycles. I've noticed Django loading and appengine_django helper installation takes solid amount of time (~0.8 sec) and I guess CPU cycles. See log extract from main.py : # 12-11 10:42AM 27.040 - Loading django helper... # 12-11 10:42AM 27.862 - Successfully loaded django helper It does not affect my CPU quota but harm user expirience and make me nervous when checking logs in admin console :). I assume if we load Django provided by GAE it will be pre-loaded and thus no CPU/time penalities for app. Is my assumption correct? Would be really great if we could get the Django version 1.0 provided by default. The latest reply on this is http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/c3bb71cd63d8d32f May be we should fill a feature request to speed it up? P.S. I'm wonder what if Django could be provided pre-patched as an option? P.P.S. I know - this is too specific request for general platform as GAE so would be happy to get any advises on speeding up cold requests. For example I already do not load Django if page content found in memcache. Still would prefer to have Django pre-loaded. May be by specifying this in app.yaml? -- Alex http:/sharp-developer.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 - any update on plans to replace 0.96 ?
For the time being I've disabled some operations in InstallAppengineHelperForDjango() (which I believe not used by my app at the moment) That reduced init time of Django from 0.8 to 0.3 sec. LoadAppengineEnvironment() #InstallReplacementImpModule() InstallAppengineDatabaseBackend() InstallModelForm() #InstallGoogleMemcache() InstallDjangoModuleReplacements() #PatchDjangoSerializationModules() CleanupDjangoSettings() #ModifyAvailableCommands() #InstallGoogleSMTPConnection() #InstallAuthentication() May be it could be useful to someone. Have fun. -- Alex http://sharp-developer.net/ On Dec 12, 9:47 pm, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Marzia, Have GAE team thought about providing some warm-up url? So if GAE see a load is increasing (and probably could predict a new request handler will be needed soon) then engine calls some URL specified in app.yaml (for example) and a request handler instance created and kept in cache for a while. So we do not waste time when a user request comes? I do not talk about 100% accuracy but some sort of pro-active warming would benefit. May be you could even disable calls to DB/memcache/etc so it is just modules initialization. -- Alexhttp://sharp-developer.net/ On Dec 12, 6:49 pm, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote: Hi Alex, We are definitely interested in offering Django 1.0 with App Engine in the future. However, it seems likely that including Django 1.0 as the default Django version with App Engine would need to be part of an api version change, since such a change would likely brake existing apps. In terms of the high CPU warnings, we are generally working on a solution that will lesson the affect of such warnings on applications, so we hope we can address this soon not just for this case, but in general. As for the time concern, there isn't much right now that can be done. But as your application increases in popularity, it's more likely people will see an already warm interpreter and thus not have to wait for a new initialization. -Marzia On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Any plans to update Django 0.96 to Django 1.0 ? The 1.0 has been released on Sep 3 and still not there. I use local version of Django 1.0 and it's OK but my concern is performance and CPU usage. Whenever new instance of handler is created by GAE it takes some time and I guess CPU cycles. I've noticed Django loading and appengine_django helper installation takes solid amount of time (~0.8 sec) and I guess CPU cycles. See log extract from main.py : # 12-11 10:42AM 27.040 - Loading django helper... # 12-11 10:42AM 27.862 - Successfully loaded django helper It does not affect my CPU quota but harm user expirience and make me nervous when checking logs in admin console :). I assume if we load Django provided by GAE it will be pre-loaded and thus no CPU/time penalities for app. Is my assumption correct? Would be really great if we could get the Django version 1.0 provided by default. The latest reply on this is http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/c3bb71cd63d8d32f May be we should fill a feature request to speed it up? P.S. I'm wonder what if Django could be provided pre-patched as an option? P.P.S. I know - this is too specific request for general platform as GAE so would be happy to get any advises on speeding up cold requests. For example I already do not load Django if page content found in memcache. Still would prefer to have Django pre-loaded. May be by specifying this in app.yaml? -- Alex http:/sharp-developer.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 - any update on plans to replace 0.96 ?
It will be nice if GAE always keep one warmed up spare process. On Dec 12, 4:47 pm, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Marzia, Have GAE team thought about providing some warm-up url? So if GAE see a load is increasing (and probably could predict a new request handler will be needed soon) then engine calls some URL specified in app.yaml (for example) and a request handler instance created and kept in cache for a while. So we do not waste time when a user request comes? I do not talk about 100% accuracy but some sort of pro-active warming would benefit. May be you could even disable calls to DB/memcache/etc so it is just modules initialization. -- Alexhttp://sharp-developer.net/ On Dec 12, 6:49 pm, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote: Hi Alex, We are definitely interested in offering Django 1.0 with App Engine in the future. However, it seems likely that including Django 1.0 as the default Django version with App Engine would need to be part of an api version change, since such a change would likely brake existing apps. In terms of the high CPU warnings, we are generally working on a solution that will lesson the affect of such warnings on applications, so we hope we can address this soon not just for this case, but in general. As for the time concern, there isn't much right now that can be done. But as your application increases in popularity, it's more likely people will see an already warm interpreter and thus not have to wait for a new initialization. -Marzia On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Sharp-Developer.Net alexander.trakhime...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Any plans to update Django 0.96 to Django 1.0 ? The 1.0 has been released on Sep 3 and still not there. I use local version of Django 1.0 and it's OK but my concern is performance and CPU usage. Whenever new instance of handler is created by GAE it takes some time and I guess CPU cycles. I've noticed Django loading and appengine_django helper installation takes solid amount of time (~0.8 sec) and I guess CPU cycles. See log extract from main.py : # 12-11 10:42AM 27.040 - Loading django helper... # 12-11 10:42AM 27.862 - Successfully loaded django helper It does not affect my CPU quota but harm user expirience and make me nervous when checking logs in admin console :). I assume if we load Django provided by GAE it will be pre-loaded and thus no CPU/time penalities for app. Is my assumption correct? Would be really great if we could get the Django version 1.0 provided by default. The latest reply on this is http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/c3bb71cd63d8d32f May be we should fill a feature request to speed it up? P.S. I'm wonder what if Django could be provided pre-patched as an option? P.P.S. I know - this is too specific request for general platform as GAE so would be happy to get any advises on speeding up cold requests. For example I already do not load Django if page content found in memcache. Still would prefer to have Django pre-loaded. May be by specifying this in app.yaml? -- Alex http:/sharp-developer.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 -- would someone from Google please respond
Paul, Thanks very much for answering my question, I really appreciate it and I am sure many others do as well. Thanks again, Michael I Angerman Albuquerque, New Mexico http://www.zrato.com On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael, While we'd like to support Django 1.0 be default in App Engine its going to be a little while before we'll have that support. We are currently working on some larger features that require the team's resources. For the time being we suggest you include it in the app you are uploading to App Engine. Below is a link to a thread that discuss getting Django 1.0 working with App Engine. http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/edaa3f36ebef201f/a0935973b63b9e34?lnk=gstq=Using+django+1.0#a0935973b63b9e34 Please let us know if you have any questions. Paul - Product Manager, App Engine On Sep 6, 12:35 pm, Michael Angerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this group has already got an official announcement that the next version of appengine will have Django 1.0 inside it, so we don't have to upload it with our app, Just tell me its official and point me to the email or blog posting where it has been announced, if it hasn't been announced yet then here goes my flame. There are lots of developers out there in the community who would like to know the answer to this question, because it impacts them on whether or not to release their new app or lets say wait for another week or two. This is exactly the type of communication that is lacking from Google's management -- and why their has been a thread recently on why people are disappointed in the lack of information from Google. I think appengine is a great product, really amazing, and I think all of the other Google products are great too, so I am big huge fan of Google, but why are they letting the developer community down by not supplying them with information in a timely fashion that impacts developers decisions. This information that I am asking for is extremely basic and others have asked the same question in recent days. So I could go on here, but Google management ! surprise us for once and just answer the question definitively. I am not expecting to have an answer like it will happen next week. But just give the developer community a general sense that yes it will happen in the next month or so, or not, that is sort of OK too, but keeping the community abreast on what is going on is really the point here. Thanks for you continued support, Michael I Angerman Albuquerque, New Mexico http://www.zrato.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 -- would someone from Google please respond
Hi Michael, While we'd like to support Django 1.0 be default in App Engine its going to be a little while before we'll have that support. We are currently working on some larger features that require the team's resources. For the time being we suggest you include it in the app you are uploading to App Engine. Below is a link to a thread that discuss getting Django 1.0 working with App Engine. http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/edaa3f36ebef201f/a0935973b63b9e34?lnk=gstq=Using+django+1.0#a0935973b63b9e34 Please let us know if you have any questions. Paul - Product Manager, App Engine On Sep 6, 12:35 pm, Michael Angerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this group has already got an official announcement that the next version of appengine will have Django 1.0 inside it, so we don't have to upload it with our app, Just tell me its official and point me to the email or blog posting where it has been announced, if it hasn't been announced yet then here goes my flame. There are lots of developers out there in the community who would like to know the answer to this question, because it impacts them on whether or not to release their new app or lets say wait for another week or two. This is exactly the type of communication that is lacking from Google's management -- and why their has been a thread recently on why people are disappointed in the lack of information from Google. I think appengine is a great product, really amazing, and I think all of the other Google products are great too, so I am big huge fan of Google, but why are they letting the developer community down by not supplying them with information in a timely fashion that impacts developers decisions. This information that I am asking for is extremely basic and others have asked the same question in recent days. So I could go on here, but Google management ! surprise us for once and just answer the question definitively. I am not expecting to have an answer like it will happen next week. But just give the developer community a general sense that yes it will happen in the next month or so, or not, that is sort of OK too, but keeping the community abreast on what is going on is really the point here. Thanks for you continued support, Michael I Angerman Albuquerque, New Mexico http://www.zrato.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0 -- would someone from Google please respond
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael, While we'd like to support Django 1.0 be default in App Engine its going to be a little while before we'll have that support. Paul, I would like to point out that there is also very heavy demand for other web frameworks in addition to Django. Currently appengine comes bundled with WebOb, which is a core library that Turbogears 2.0 and Pylons use. There is a substantial base of professional software developers all of the world that would love to have Django as well as WebOb derived frameworks bundled. Personally, I think it would be a great service to the Python community to natively include these frameworks with appengine if Django is included, or at least ensure that their components work such as Genshi or Mako templating by default. Thanks again for the communication! We are currently working on some larger features that require the team's resources. For the time being we suggest you include it in the app you are uploading to App Engine. Below is a link to a thread that discuss getting Django 1.0 working with App Engine. http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/edaa3f36ebef201f/a0935973b63b9e34?lnk=gstq=Using+django+1.0#a0935973b63b9e34 Please let us know if you have any questions. Paul - Product Manager, App Engine On Sep 6, 12:35 pm, Michael Angerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this group has already got an official announcement that the next version of appengine will have Django 1.0 inside it, so we don't have to upload it with our app, Just tell me its official and point me to the email or blog posting where it has been announced, if it hasn't been announced yet then here goes my flame. There are lots of developers out there in the community who would like to know the answer to this question, because it impacts them on whether or not to release their new app or lets say wait for another week or two. This is exactly the type of communication that is lacking from Google's management -- and why their has been a thread recently on why people are disappointed in the lack of information from Google. I think appengine is a great product, really amazing, and I think all of the other Google products are great too, so I am big huge fan of Google, but why are they letting the developer community down by not supplying them with information in a timely fashion that impacts developers decisions. This information that I am asking for is extremely basic and others have asked the same question in recent days. So I could go on here, but Google management ! surprise us for once and just answer the question definitively. I am not expecting to have an answer like it will happen next week. But just give the developer community a general sense that yes it will happen in the next month or so, or not, that is sort of OK too, but keeping the community abreast on what is going on is really the point here. Thanks for you continued support, Michael I Angerman Albuquerque, New Mexico http://www.zrato.com -- Noah Gift http://noahgift.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0?
First search result on Django 1.0: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/d91a710891cc6789 On Sep 3, 8:40 pm, DaNmarner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does any body know whether GAE is going to update the version included Django to 1.0? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Django 1.0?
I think the question is not if, but when. I hope it will happen very soon, now that 1.0 final is out... On 4 Sep., 02:40, DaNmarner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does any body know whether GAE is going to update the version included Django to 1.0? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
