[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-20 Thread bFlood

I agree jay, the most important feature for me right now is getting
the payment system in place. One thing that is not clear to me is if
we will be able to buy more Puts-per-hour so that we aren't taken
offline for a legitimate spike in traffic. I'm not sure how I would
tell me clients to *slowly* ramp up their usage :) (now if there was a
queue in GAE that I could dump to and slowly add from the background,
i would gladly use it). I've looked at SimpleDB too and the lack of
Put limits makes it far easier to test a real-world application.

some notes on this from yesterday's chat that were somewhat
encouraging:

[09:29am] ryan_google: billing will include user-definable budgets,
notifications, and other tools to let you ensure that you're not cut
off

[09:52am] danielobrien: Vamsi: Billing is sometime between now and the
end
of march, not necessarily march itself. --maybe March, yuck

[09:57am] marzia_google: bFlood: we are trying to release some form
of
billing by the end of the year, but the exact timeline and form of
such a
release is yet to be determined


On Nov 19, 10:12 pm, Jay Freeman \(saurik\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 It seems to me like, if this were a problem, then Google isn't doing their
 job when it comes to scaling our applications. When I'm using Amazon's S3 or
 their SimpleDB (or, for the most part, EC2) I just have to think about how
 much I pay for per GB used and per GB transferred. Amazon provides me
 almost no limitations on how much data I can store or how quickly I can
 access it, so why does Google? Is Amazon's ability to install more servers
 to handle increased load fundamentally greater than that of Google's? I wish
 less time was spent on quotas, even on features... even on /fixing bugs/
 (and yes, even those which I consider to be blocking issues), and more time
 was spent on billing infrastructure so I could start paying them to scale in
 the way my application actually needs rather than in the ways they are
 willing to provide out of the kindness of their giant Google hearts for
 free. :( -J

 --
 From: Barry Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:57 AM
 To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

  Remember AppEngine is a 'shared' environment - lots of apps are all
  using a slice of the same resources.

  Would you rather that someone (maliciously or simply though ignorance)
  monopolizes all the resources (even if they are paying) and that
  brings your app (though no fault of your own) to a standstill.

 ...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-19 Thread Raj

I understand some of the reasons given above, I guess my app is not
for AppEngine then. I feel that Google would end up alienating
developers with their quota system. When they announced the AppEngine,
they talked about quotas in a different way - some millions or so cpu
hours would be free per month. But, with this per request quotas and
red warnings that I get for most urls long long before I have been
anywhere close to that enormous free stuff which was promised; I feel
that the facts wasn't communicated properly or I didn't understand
them properly. I don't have time to discuss this and waste my time
further, I am off to Amazon today.

Quota   Limit
Emails per Day  2,000
Bandwidth In per Day*   10,000 MB
Bandwidth Out per Day*  10,000 MB
HTTPS Bandwidth In per Day  2,000 MB
HTTPS Bandwidth Out per Day 2,000 MB
CPU Megacycles per Day  200,000,000
Total HTTP Requests per Day 650,000
HTTPS Requests per Day  130,000
Datastore API Calls per Day 2,500,000
URLFetch API Calls per Day  160,000

This is *bs*to at least a class of developers, because it is not true
in reality for them.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-19 Thread Jay Freeman (saurik)

It seems to me like, if this were a problem, then Google isn't doing their 
job when it comes to scaling our applications. When I'm using Amazon's S3 or 
their SimpleDB (or, for the most part, EC2) I just have to think about how 
much I pay for per GB used and per GB transferred. Amazon provides me 
almost no limitations on how much data I can store or how quickly I can 
access it, so why does Google? Is Amazon's ability to install more servers 
to handle increased load fundamentally greater than that of Google's? I wish 
less time was spent on quotas, even on features... even on /fixing bugs/ 
(and yes, even those which I consider to be blocking issues), and more time 
was spent on billing infrastructure so I could start paying them to scale in 
the way my application actually needs rather than in the ways they are 
willing to provide out of the kindness of their giant Google hearts for 
free. :( -J

--
From: Barry Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:57 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

 Remember AppEngine is a 'shared' environment - lots of apps are all
 using a slice of the same resources.

 Would you rather that someone (maliciously or simply though ignorance)
 monopolizes all the resources (even if they are paying) and that
 brings your app (though no fault of your own) to a standstill.
... 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-11 Thread mawei1981

Hi,All

now I worry about my applications that I development on google
appengine. when the quota has been exceed. what can  I do??

transfer it to Django again or that

how about you/?


On Nov 10, 6:47 pm, Barry Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Google have said that Quotas will still be there for paying customers,
 most will then be higher but they wont be gone. My personal opinion of
 course, but Google want you to spend time to make your application
 better not just throw more money at the problem (which is just
 delagating the developement to Google)

 However its also been said that high CPU warnings is generally
 considered a bug, so that will be 'cured' at some point for everyone.

 On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  It would be nice to get an assurance that paid accounts will cure
  quotas, when they arrive.

  Cheers!
  Greg.

 --
 Barry

 -www.nearby.org.uk-www.geograph.org.uk-
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-10 Thread Barry Hunter

Google have said that Quotas will still be there for paying customers,
most will then be higher but they wont be gone. My personal opinion of
course, but Google want you to spend time to make your application
better not just throw more money at the problem (which is just
delagating the developement to Google)

However its also been said that high CPU warnings is generally
considered a bug, so that will be 'cured' at some point for everyone.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would be nice to get an assurance that paid accounts will cure
 quotas, when they arrive.

 Cheers!
 Greg.
 




-- 
Barry

- www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk -

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[google-appengine] Re: quotas in appengine

2008-11-09 Thread Greg

It would be nice to get an assurance that paid accounts will cure
quotas, when they arrive.

Cheers!
Greg.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---