Integration between GWT & GWT-EXT application
Hi, I've a requirement where I need to integrate 2 GWT applications. One of the applications is developed in GWT and another in GWT-EXT. Basically, my main application is in GWT which is using GWT widgets for display. Another application is using GWT-EXT for panel display. My requirement is to display an existing panel of application 2 in application 1. Any suggestions will be really helpful. Thanks in advance !! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: What's the latest GWT version usable with GWT-Ext?
That sounds suspiciously like a project I used to work on! Thankfully I am at a different company now and don't have to worry about it anymore, last I heard they were throwing it all away and re-writing using PHP/pure JS. From memory, GWT-Ext wasn't the best implementation (but you have probably found that) and I suspect you aren't going to have much luck moving to a more recent GWT :( On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:16:24 UTC+1, walker1c wrote: I have the unenviable task of resurrecting and modifying a project that was last touched about six years ago. The project uses GWT 1.5.3 and makes extensive use of the GWT-EXT widget toolkit that ceased active development when 1.5.3 was current. There is currently no budget for replacing GWT-EXT with an alternative, so I have to work with what I've got, but I would very much like to update the GWT version, both to take advantage of GWT improvements, and to avoid having to set up a development environment with historic versions of Eclipse, Maven, and associated plugins. What's the latest GWT version anyone has succeeded is using with GWT-EXT? Any links to crib-sheets for this kind of environment would be most appreciated, as they could save me a lot of time. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
What's the latest GWT version usable with GWT-Ext?
I have the unenviable task of resurrecting and modifying a project that was last touched about six years ago. The project uses GWT 1.5.3 and makes extensive use of the GWT-EXT widget toolkit that ceased active development when 1.5.3 was current. There is currently no budget for replacing GWT-EXT with an alternative, so I have to work with what I've got, but I would very much like to update the GWT version, both to take advantage of GWT improvements, and to avoid having to set up a development environment with historic versions of Eclipse, Maven, and associated plugins. What's the latest GWT version anyone has succeeded is using with GWT-EXT? Any links to crib-sheets for this kind of environment would be most appreciated, as they could save me a lot of time. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Gwt-ext Designer Netbeans
Is the Designer for netbeans now? On Friday, February 20, 2009 6:29:44 AM UTC-5, heru wrote: thank you for your reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Gwt-ext Designer Netbeans
Not to my knowledge. On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:30:06 PM UTC-4, nithin wrote: Is the Designer for netbeans now? On Friday, February 20, 2009 6:29:44 AM UTC-5, heru wrote: thank you for your reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Adding GWT-EXT Button on toolbar displayed differently than to add it on a panel
I want to know that when i add a GWT-EXT button to the toolbar it appears as if it were a link or Simply text,the border is not visible and it just got blended with the toolbar . However when we add the same button to the panel it viewed properly. I just want the button when it is added to to toolbar of a panel to be exactly similar when it is added to a panel. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5
Isn't it an issue of gwt-ext and it is better to ask their support if it should work with gwt 2.5? Though I believe a little bit more detailed problem description is required in order to get a reasonable help. On Sunday, January 6, 2013 8:10:08 AM UTC+4, tagoor wrote: Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5 can u please help it out -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/yFGVEBsjQGgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5
Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5 can u please help it out -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/BO0TafDBJvUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
smartgwt is only a wrapper over a js library... you can get problem between browser... After some test, i think GXT 3 is the best choice, very easy to use, good documentation. Sure is not free... but the time saved...you buy easily a licence you can also check vaadin (it use gwt for widget) ... it's a server centric framework... but vaadin 7 will support client side too... Le jeudi 13 septembre 2012 21:29:00 UTC+2, Manuel a écrit : Hi everyone, I just started on GWT and reading alot on that guides and tutorials. Actually i try to find out, which tool to use, to design UI. Regarding to this post http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/ I should use smartgwt, but... I looked these showcases up: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#gridGrouping http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_summaries I think, gwt ext feel more smooter to use and its not as laagy as smartgwt. So, I just started and try to figure out whats the pros / cons on each tool... Hope you can help me with that, and give me maybe some hints I missed. Thanks Regards, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/s8yl2Z5rHTwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
(d) does not apply to SmartGWT. No GWT update has ever broken SmartGWT or broken backcompat. (e) does not apply to SmartGWT. Nightlies are available for all editions - see smartclient.com/builds (c) presumably means customizing a widget by messing with it's DOM or overriding internal methods. SmartGWT has a big range of documented and supported customization APIs that don't involve low-level hacking, and if these break, we consider it a bug and fix it. (a) (b) [performance stuff] needs to be considered in light of what actually drives performance for your application. SmartGWT is designed for complex enterprise applications, so we do not optimize for first-ever page load experience (doesn't apply to apps used repeatedly and for long sessions). Instead we optimize for maximal data reuse, since round-trips to the app server database are almost always the thing to optimize in enterprise apps. A deeper discussion is in the SmartGWT QuickStart Guide, Evaluating SmartGWT chapter. In a nutshell: - the drawbacks of Sencha are not the drawbacks of SmartGWT - get clarity on what performance characteristics will matter for your end users, *then* look at performance from that perspective. If you hyper-optimize the wrong thing, your app will be slow for your end users. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:26:02 AM UTC-7, Andrei wrote: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/N01iJIj6y5wJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
(d) no release of GWT has ever broken SmartGWT. We don't rely on much from GWT other than Java-JavaScript translation, so there is little room for something to break. (c) This may refer to breakage from customizations like modifying a component's DOM or overriding internals. In SmartGWT we have documented extension points, and if they break, we consider it a bug and fix it (e) We provide nightly builds at smartclient.com/builds, so there is never a delay. (a), (b) [performance stuff] We focus on optimizing for enterprise applications, where first-time-ever page load is not much of a concern because the users repeatedly return to the app and use it for longer sessions. Similarly we focus on reducing trips to the server and/or database since this is usually the bottleneck in an enterprise application. A deeper discussion of this is in the SmartGWT QuickStart Guide, Evaluating SmartGWT chapter. In a nutshell: - your experience with Sencha breakage doesn't apply to SmartGWT - carefully consider what will actually drive performance for end users. If you heavily optimize the wrong thing, your users will have a slow application. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:26:02 AM UTC-7, Andrei wrote: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/J5PA5KI8sSUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
I'd have a look at GXT 3.x from Sencha, I can't compare to the others but I think its the best GWT add-on library available. -Dave On Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:29:00 PM UTC-6, Manuel wrote: Hi everyone, I just started on GWT and reading alot on that guides and tutorials. Actually i try to find out, which tool to use, to design UI. Regarding to this post http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/ I should use smartgwt, but... I looked these showcases up: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#gridGrouping http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_summaries I think, gwt ext feel more smooter to use and its not as laagy as smartgwt. So, I just started and try to figure out whats the pros / cons on each tool... Hope you can help me with that, and give me maybe some hints I missed. Thanks Regards, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/AO7KGrSt2HwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
Hey, thanks for your response. I already had a look at Sencha. But as Iam a beginner in GWT I was looking for something thats free to use, but could be used for commercial purpose aswell. Sencha has a GPL License and is for Open Sorce only. SmartGWT is under LGPL licensed, so this could be used for commercial purpose, I guess. Bad thing on SmartGwt´s Version 3.0 (newest version) is, its not working with the GWT Designer... But at this point, I dont even know if the GWT Designer should be used for UI Design. Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 16:00:48 UTC+2 schrieb dhoffer: I'd have a look at GXT 3.x from Sencha, I can't compare to the others but I think its the best GWT add-on library available. -Dave On Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:29:00 PM UTC-6, Manuel wrote: Hi everyone, I just started on GWT and reading alot on that guides and tutorials. Actually i try to find out, which tool to use, to design UI. Regarding to this post http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/ I should use smartgwt, but... I looked these showcases up: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#gridGrouping http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_summaries I think, gwt ext feel more smooter to use and its not as laagy as smartgwt. So, I just started and try to figure out whats the pros / cons on each tool... Hope you can help me with that, and give me maybe some hints I missed. Thanks Regards, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ECJrPJUFYMoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/pUpHcSyL2cwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
Couldn't agree more! On Sunday, September 16, 2012 7:26:02 PM UTC+2, Andrei wrote: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/6dy-QaA06PMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
Hey, thanks for sharing your experience. I will take a look at the UI.Binder stuff. In the meantime i had a look at vaadin (Apache License Version 2.0), another UI library. Since this library works on the server-side, Iam not sure if this is a considerable solution. Anyway, I guess I will stay with pure GWT for now. There are more interesting things to take a look at besides UI :) Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 19:26:02 UTC+2 schrieb Andrei: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/gmzdAKYlXIMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
The best UI library i ve found so far to use with GWT on the Desktop is Flex. Hard to believe to i ve tried them all. Nothing beats Flex on the Desktop. 2012/9/16 Manuel develop.m...@gmail.com Hey, thanks for sharing your experience. I will take a look at the UI.Binder stuff. In the meantime i had a look at vaadin (Apache License Version 2.0), another UI library. Since this library works on the server-side, Iam not sure if this is a considerable solution. Anyway, I guess I will stay with pure GWT for now. There are more interesting things to take a look at besides UI :) Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 19:26:02 UTC+2 schrieb Andrei: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/gmzdAKYlXIMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
Hi, You have a couple of other UI library choices: *GWT Bootstrap* demo: - http://gwtbootstrap.github.com/ *mgwt* demo: - http://gwt-cx.com/mgwt-basic-project/index.html Some useful links: Smart GWT tutorials: - http://uptick.com.au/blog Ext GWT demo: - http://gwt-cx.com/extgwt-serendipity/Serendipity.html Cheers Rob Kiahu.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/b4g4GXo59LMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
Hi everyone, I just started on GWT and reading alot on that guides and tutorials. Actually i try to find out, which tool to use, to design UI. Regarding to this post http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/ I should use smartgwt, but... I looked these showcases up: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#gridGrouping http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_summaries I think, gwt ext feel more smooter to use and its not as laagy as smartgwt. So, I just started and try to figure out whats the pros / cons on each tool... Hope you can help me with that, and give me maybe some hints I missed. Thanks Regards, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/1zctHTngl_oJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Add Google Maps API on GWT-ext
I have just create the example of the web page with a new Web Application Project using GWT 2.3, the gwt-maps-1.1.1 release candidate of Eric Z. Ayers and the GWT designer 2.3.1 more updated from Eclipse and the example works fine. I discover a way to put the web applications in android just putting some files of the project, I'll write the results, later in my web page www.upiicsalibre.org Henry On 13 mayo, 07:52, Bill bjr...@gmail.com wrote: Henry, I'm not exactly sure how far along you are based on your question. Have you already been through the example athttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/wiki/MapsGettingStarted? I found that I had to use GWT SDK 2.1.1 in order to work with the GWTmapsAPI. The latestmapsAPI didn't seem to work for me with GWT 2.2.0 and I haven't tried GWT 2.3 yet. I also found that I had to use gxt-2.1.1 (instead of gxt-2.2.3) to work with GWT 2.1.1. Long story short, I had to revert to some older versions of the GWT SDK and gxt in order to work with the latest GWTmapsAPI. Perhaps someone else reading this can confirm or deny that this was necessary. Hope this helps. Bill On May 13, 2:17 am, Henry henryubu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi: I want to create a project using theGoogleMapsAPI with GWT-ext on Eclipse. I'm a newbie using GWT-ext, does anyone knows about a tutotial o have a tutorial to add degooglemapsAPI? I put a pic of the component I want to activate in GWT-exthttp://www.flickr.com/photos/57139144@N02/5715458100/ Any help will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Add Google Maps API on GWT-ext
Hi: I want to create a project using the Google Maps API with GWT-ext on Eclipse. I'm a newbie using GWT-ext, does anyone knows about a tutotial o have a tutorial to add de google maps API? I put a pic of the component I want to activate in GWT-ext http://www.flickr.com/photos/57139144@N02/5715458100/ Any help will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Add Google Maps API on GWT-ext
Henry, I'm not exactly sure how far along you are based on your question. Have you already been through the example at http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/wiki/MapsGettingStarted ? I found that I had to use GWT SDK 2.1.1 in order to work with the GWT maps API. The latest maps API didn't seem to work for me with GWT 2.2.0 and I haven't tried GWT 2.3 yet. I also found that I had to use gxt-2.1.1 (instead of gxt-2.2.3) to work with GWT 2.1.1. Long story short, I had to revert to some older versions of the GWT SDK and gxt in order to work with the latest GWT maps API. Perhaps someone else reading this can confirm or deny that this was necessary. Hope this helps. Bill On May 13, 2:17 am, Henry henryubu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi: I want to create a project using the Google Maps API with GWT-ext on Eclipse. I'm a newbie using GWT-ext, does anyone knows about a tutotial o have a tutorial to add de google maps API? I put a pic of the component I want to activate in GWT-exthttp://www.flickr.com/photos/57139144@N02/5715458100/ Any help will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Session Management in the gwt-ext
Hello All I am working on the gwt-ext application.On the server side I am using Hibernate.I am mantaining session on the server side.it's time out is 5 minute (In action class). Now take a secenario in which a user logged in remains it open for five minute.After five minutes expires it do a click on a button on the screen.There is some process on the client side it is of 2 minutes and after that it goes for a server call.When it go for server call it is already session out (as session time is 5 minutes which is already expired).And a message of session out popped up with redirecting the login page. In this whole case user feels that I am active on the system so why I am redirected to login page. Reason behind is that that session is maintained on the server side.And server hit is after seven minutes. So I am thinking to maitain the session on the client side also.How to achieve this in the gwt based application. Is there any other way to do solve this issue. Thanks to all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
[gwt-contrib] Session Management in the gwt-ext
Hello All I am working on the gwt-ext application.On the server side I am using Hibernate.I am mantaining session on the server side.it's time out is 5 minute (In action class). Now take a secenario in which a user logged in remains it open for five minute.After five minutes expires it do a click on a button on the screen.There is some process on the client side it is of 2 minutes and after that it goes for a server call.When it go for server call it is already session out (as session time is 5 minutes which is already expired).And a message of session out popped up with redirecting the login page. In this whole case user feels that I am active on the system so why I am redirected to login page. Reason behind is that that session is maintained on the server side.And server hit is after seven minutes. So I am thinking to maitain the session on the client side also.How to achieve this in the gwt based application. Is there any other way to do solve this issue. Thanks to all. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
GWT-ext: Position of the Widgets inside the Window
Hello, I have a question about GWT-ext. I used the method setPosition (int x, int y) to change the position of my Widgets (panels, buttons, labels .) inside my window but they are displayed on the top left . Do you have any suggestions? Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Is there any sample application Login in gwt-ext?
Dear All, i am new be for GWT,..i wanna try for make login that useing any database connection but there any sample that practicaly easy step by step, i have read from some e-book GWT and see some example but it difficult to implementation please help.. could any body or some body give me some sample code? that using database -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT-EXT 2.0.5 + GWT 2.1
Does anybody knows why GWT-EXT 2.0.5 doesn't work with GWT 2.1? In my application with GWT 2.0.x, GWT-EXT works fine but, with 2.1 some custom widgets simply don't appear on screen... Should I migrate to SmartGWT ? WIll be a hard work to do... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT-EXT Store is not working in server side
Hi,
I am using GWT-EXT. I am having trouble initializing GWT-EXT Store in
a RPC call in server side.
public class FloorPlanServiceImpl extends RemoteServiceServlet
implements
FloorPlanService {
private Object [][] links = new Object[][]{
new Object[]{Math,CS445},
new Object[]{Biology,CS446}
};
private final Store linksStore = new SimpleStore(new String[]
{subject,course},links);
@Override
public String getHyperlink(String inputFloor) {
linksStore.load();
return linksStore.query(floor, inputFloor).toString();
}
during runtime I am getting the following error...
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
com.google.gwt.core.client.impl.Impl.getModuleBaseURL()Ljava/lang/
String;
at com.google.gwt.core.client.impl.Impl.getModuleBaseURL(Native
Method)
at com.google.gwt.core.client.GWT.getModuleBaseURL(GWT.java:122)
at com.gwtext.client.core.JsObject.clinit(JsObject.java:37)
at
com.se2.waterlooguide.server.FloorPlanServiceImpl.init(FloorPlanServiceImpl.java:
16)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:
39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:
27)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT-EXT Store is not working in server side
I am using GWT-EXT. I am having trouble initializing GWT-EXT Store in a RPC call in server side. I use all my Stores client side. I can't see the purpose of using it server side. Of course I load the data into the store via RPC... Shawn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT-EXT Store is not working in server side
You cant use a JS classes on a server side..server side is just a normal Java-servlet all this classes must and can be used just in the translatable part of the gwt application. regards, B On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.comwrote: I am using GWT-EXT. I am having trouble initializing GWT-EXT Store in a RPC call in server side. I use all my Stores client side. I can't see the purpose of using it server side. Of course I load the data into the store via RPC... Shawn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT-Ext - Unable to load module entry point class...
Can help anyone? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT-Ext - Unable to load module entry point class...
Hi,
i've got a problem...
I try do it this:
http://www.17od.com/2008/07/24/how-to-create-a-remote-paging-listview-using-gwt-ext/
I using:
- Eclipse Platform
Version: 3.5.2.R35x_v20100210-0800-9hEiFzmFst-
TiEn9hNYgDWg1XN8ulH_JvCNGB
Build id: M20100211-1343
- SDK - GWT: 2.0.3
- ext-2.0.2
- gwtext-2.0.5
My files:
ExtText.gwt.xml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
module rename-to='exttext'
inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/
inherits name='com.gwtext.GwtExt' /
inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.theme.standard.Standard'/
entry-point class='com.extext.client.ExtText'/
source path='client'/
source path='shared'/
stylesheet src=js/ext/resources/css/ext-all.css /
script src=js/ext/adapter/ext/ext-base.js /
script src=js/ext/ext-all.js /
/module
I add in war/js/ext:
/adapter
/resources
ext-all.js
ext-all-debug.js
ext-core.js
ext-core-debug.js
in war/WEB-INF/lib i added: gwtext.jar
In Java Build Path i added library gwtext.jar
When i run this application i see errors:
10:50:43.960 [ERROR] [exttext] Unable to load module entry point class
com.extext.client.ExtText (see associated exception for details)
com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): $wnd.Ext
is undefined
fileName: http://127.0.0.1:
lineNumber: 227
stack: ()@http://127.0.0.1::227
connect(http://127.0.0.1:/ExtText.html?
gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997,JRV.nYqwS{(uX4x,127.0.0.1:9997,exttext,2.0)@:
0
((void 0),exttext,http://127.0.0.1:/exttext/;)@http://
127.0.0.1:/exttext/hosted.html?exttext:264
z()@http://127.0.0.1:/exttext/exttext.nocache.js:2
(4)@http://127.0.0.1:/exttext/exttext.nocache.js:9
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.invokeJavascript(BrowserChannelServer.java:
195)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpaceOOPHM.doInvoke(ModuleSpaceOOPHM.java:
120)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNative(ModuleSpace.java:
507)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNativeBoolean(ModuleSpace.java:
179)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.JavaScriptHost.invokeNativeBoolean(JavaScriptHost.java:
35)
at com.gwtext.client.widgets.Component.checkExtVer(Component.java)
at com.gwtext.client.widgets.Component.clinit(Component.java:
108)
at com.extext.client.ExtText.onModuleLoad(ExtText.java:15)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.onLoad(ModuleSpace.java:
369)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.OophmSessionHandler.loadModule(OophmSessionHandler.java:
185)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.processConnection(BrowserChannelServer.java:
380)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.run(BrowserChannelServer.java:
222)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Please help me.
Thanks for answer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Compatibility for GWT and GWT EXT
Hi , I need to use Editable grid provided by GWT- Ext . The issue here is that the editable grid is to be displayed on click of a tab and the tab is of type import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.TabPanel; Can someone please tell me which version of GWT - EXt should I use ? I am using GWT 2.0.3 version. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
Here is the underlying Webkit bug causing this: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40355 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
Thanks all I will try to fix some peace of code in my application Cheers Eric On 9 juin, 23:53, Dan Dunham dunha...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the underlying Webkit bug causing this:https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40355 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
Interestingly i've discovered that this bug only applies to 32bit safari. On 10.5 or Win running safari 5 normally causes the error, but if i choose to use rosetta to run it (64bit ppc code), it works fine. On 10.6 when safari is in i386_x64 mode, it works fine, but if i choose to run in 32-bit mode then I'm seeing the exception again. On Jun 8, 1:22 pm, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: I am not use deferred commands and code splitting so the problem stay unsolved . Please help On 8 juin, 19:17, matthew jones bigboxe...@gmail.com wrote: We're using deferred commands and code splitting. On Jun 8, 12:12 pm, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: On 8 juin, 18:54, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/08/2010 09:46 AM, matthew jones wrote: Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Are you using deferred commands or codesplitting? I'mn seeing the same thing on the Linux build of Chrome. No, this error appear on 2 tree (gwt ext) and a Grid with a potential big set of data... But an other grid in an others part of my application, with an other big set of data work ... I use cross-site compilation (xs linker) ... Thanks for reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. I don't known where the error come in my application. And my application run in DevMode! Any helps will be welcome Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. I don't known where the error come in my application. And my application run in DevMode! Any helps will be welcome Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
On 06/08/2010 09:46 AM, matthew jones wrote: Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Are you using deferred commands or codesplitting? I'mn seeing the same thing on the Linux build of Chrome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
On 8 juin, 18:54, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/08/2010 09:46 AM, matthew jones wrote: Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Are you using deferred commands or codesplitting? I'mn seeing the same thing on the Linux build of Chrome. No, this error appear on 2 tree (gwt ext) and a Grid with a potential big set of data... But an other grid in an others part of my application, with an other big set of data work ... I use cross-site compilation (xs linker) ... Thanks for reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
We're using deferred commands and code splitting. On Jun 8, 12:12 pm, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: On 8 juin, 18:54, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/08/2010 09:46 AM, matthew jones wrote: Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Are you using deferred commands or codesplitting? I'mn seeing the same thing on the Linux build of Chrome. No, this error appear on 2 tree (gwt ext) and a Grid with a potential big set of data... But an other grid in an others part of my application, with an other big set of data work ... I use cross-site compilation (xs linker) ... Thanks for reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Safari 5 / GWT / GWT EXT 2.0.6
I am not use deferred commands and code splitting so the problem stay unsolved . Please help On 8 juin, 19:17, matthew jones bigboxe...@gmail.com wrote: We're using deferred commands and code splitting. On Jun 8, 12:12 pm, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: On 8 juin, 18:54, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/08/2010 09:46 AM, matthew jones wrote: Same thing here. On Jun 8, 11:43 am, eric73 e...@pentila.com wrote: Hi all! today I upgrade my Safari 4.0 to Safari 5.0 on Snow (other browsers are OK) Now my sites build with GWT 2.0.3 / GWT EXT 2.0.6 etc ... sometime don't run. I test its with Safari 4.0 and all worked. A javascript Error appear : RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Are you using deferred commands or codesplitting? I'mn seeing the same thing on the Linux build of Chrome. No, this error appear on 2 tree (gwt ext) and a Grid with a potential big set of data... But an other grid in an others part of my application, with an other big set of data work ... I use cross-site compilation (xs linker) ... Thanks for reply -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Problems with GWT-EXT widget
In case somebody comes across this post with the same problem, following the tutorial here did the trick: http://paulgrenyer.blogspot.com/2009/04/setting-up-gwt-ext-for-gwt-16-with.html On Mar 19, 4:51 pm, Dan dan.a...@googlemail.com wrote: Apologies for double posting, now sure how it happened. I also followed the instructions found here :http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/wiki/GettingStarted so I included the js and css files as suggested, inside the html file. link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=js/ext/resources/css/ ext-all.css/ link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=js/ext/resources/css/ xtheme-aero.css / script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/adapter/yui/yui- utilities.js/script script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/adapter/yui/ext-yui- adapter.js/script script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/ext-all.js/script Same error persists... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How do I use GWT-Ext 2.0.6 widgets with GWT 2.0?
Yes it it still possible. We still use it. You might discover something that doesn't work, but I cannot remember making any (GWT-EXT related) change when upgrading from GWT 1.7 to 2.0. We certainly use the date time pickers and the multiple fields form. Sebastian On Mar 21, 4:17 pm, Dan dan.a...@googlemail.com wrote: Yes, I know it's dead... But at work they have found that particular date and time pickers that they like and were wondering if it's still possible to include just those two widgets in the project. I don't mind doing some research myself as long as somebody can confirm it's still possible to use GWT-Ext in a GWT 2.0 application? Thanks for your answer anyway :) On Mar 21, 1:12 pm, gaill...@audemat.com gaill...@audemat.com wrote: I know this is not the answer you expect but GWT-Ext is a dead projet. You should try to move to Ext-GWThttp://www.extjs.com/products/gwt/?ref=learnmorebluebutton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
How do I use GWT-Ext 2.0.6 widgets with GWT 2.0?
Hi all, I am trying to find a tutorial on how to use GWT-Ext 2.0.6 widgets in a GWT 2.0 project. Only found a couple, but if I follow them and try to include the widgets here http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#multipleFieldForm I always get an error com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined stack: TypeError: Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined. Is there any step by step guide to integrate GWT-Ext 2.0.6 with GWT 2.0? The results returned are GWT-Ext, EXT-GWT and Ext all mixed together, so can't see a specific one. Thanks, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How do I use GWT-Ext 2.0.6 widgets with GWT 2.0?
I know this is not the answer you expect but GWT-Ext is a dead projet. You should try to move to Ext-GWT http://www.extjs.com/products/gwt/?ref=learnmorebluebutton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How do I use GWT-Ext 2.0.6 widgets with GWT 2.0?
Yes, I know it's dead... But at work they have found that particular date and time pickers that they like and were wondering if it's still possible to include just those two widgets in the project. I don't mind doing some research myself as long as somebody can confirm it's still possible to use GWT-Ext in a GWT 2.0 application? Thanks for your answer anyway :) On Mar 21, 1:12 pm, gaill...@audemat.com gaill...@audemat.com wrote: I know this is not the answer you expect but GWT-Ext is a dead projet. You should try to move to Ext-GWThttp://www.extjs.com/products/gwt/?ref=learnmorebluebutton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Problems with GWT-EXT widget
Hi all, I am trying to use the date and time pickers that I found here: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#multipleFieldForm which is GWT-Ext 2.0.6. GWT version I am using is 2.0 * I imported the library for GWT-Ext ( gwtext.jar ) * I inherited the package ( inherits name='com.gwtext.GwtExt' / ) in Project.gwt.xml * I included a javascript ( script src=js/ext/adapter/ext/ext- base.js / ) in Project.gwt.xml ( is it necessary? ) * I copied ext-all-debug.js, ext-all.js, ext-core-debug.js, ext- core.js inside the war folder. It compiles without problems, but if I try to launch it I get this error message: com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined stack: TypeError: Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined. Would anybody know what it is that I am missing? Thanks, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Problems with GWT-EXT widget
Hi all, I am trying to use the date and time pickers that I found here: http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/#multipleFieldForm which is GWT-Ext 2.0.6. GWT version I am using is 2.0 * I imported the library for GWT-Ext ( gwtext.jar ) * I inherited the package ( inherits name='com.gwtext.GwtExt' / ) in Project.gwt.xml * I included a javascript ( script src=js/ext/adapter/ext/ext- base.js / ) in Project.gwt.xml ( is it necessary? ) * I copied ext-all-debug.js, ext-all.js, ext-core-debug.js, ext- core.js inside the war folder. It compiles without problems, but if I try to launch it I get this error message: com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined stack: TypeError: Cannot read property 'StatusBar' of undefined. Would anybody know what it is that I am missing? Thanks, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Problems with GWT-EXT widget
Apologies for double posting, now sure how it happened. I also followed the instructions found here : http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/wiki/GettingStarted so I included the js and css files as suggested, inside the html file. link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=js/ext/resources/css/ ext-all.css/ link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=js/ext/resources/css/ xtheme-aero.css / script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/adapter/yui/yui- utilities.js/script script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/adapter/yui/ext-yui- adapter.js/script script type=text/javascript src=js/ext/ext-all.js/script Same error persists... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Barchart data update and refresh (redraw) question on using gwt-ext
Hi,
I am working on a vote widget which shows the vote by barchart. I have
problem on refreshing, showing the new statistics, after the user
click the yes button or no button.
The constructor is doing it right. It is able to put up the initialize
statistics.
The problem is on redraw after the user click the vote button.
The following is the extract of my code
public class VoteChart extends BarChart{
private VoteAccessAsync voteAccessProxy;
private Object[][] data = new Object[][]{
new Object[]{new String(Vote), new Integer(0), new
Integer(0)} --Initial vote stat
};
private int oid;
MemoryProxy proxy;
RecordDef recordDef;
ArrayReader reader;
private Store store;
VoteChart(int _oid) //Constructor is doing the right job
{
oid=_oid;
voteAccessProxy=(VoteAccessAsync)GWT.create(VoteAccess.class);
ServiceDefTarget endpoint = (ServiceDefTarget)
voteAccessProxy ;
endpoint.setServiceEntryPoint(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /
VoteAccess);
//this.setTitle, setXField, setYField.The X-Y axis are displayed
correctly
recordDef = new RecordDef(
new FieldDef[]{
new StringFieldDef(Vote),
new IntegerFieldDef(Yes),
new IntegerFieldDef(No),
}
);
proxy = new MemoryProxy(data);
reader = new ArrayReader(recordDef);
store = new Store(proxy, reader);
store.load();
this.setStore(store);
}
//This following part is the one needs to be fixed. The result returns
the correct info from database. The data is updated. The MemoryProxy
is re-constructed. Have tried various way including
store.commitchanges() but still doesnt re-draw the chart. Pleease
help.
public void loadData()
{
//AsyncCallbackVote
AsyncCallbackVote callback=
new AsyncCallbackVote(){
public void onSuccess(Vote result) {
data = new Object[][]{
new Object[]{
new
String(result.getQuestion()),
new Integer(result.getYes()),
new Integer(result.getNo())}
};
System.out.println(Data is loaded: +
result.getQuestion() + +
result.getYes()+ +
result.getNo()
);
System.out.println(Store load and commit
changes);
//store.load();
//store.commitChanges();
proxy = new MemoryProxy(data);
reader = new ArrayReader(recordDef);
store = new Store(proxy, reader);
store.load();
VoteChart.this.setStore(store);
VoteChart.this.refresh();
}
};
voteAccessProxy.getVote(oid, callback);
}
Thanks a lot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT-EXT and GWT 2.0
As GWT-EXT is not more maintained by it's team, I think that would not be a good idea use it with GWT 2.0. I don't know if it has some issue. Why don't you use SmartGWT or GXT? Regards. On Jan 29, 11:09 am, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have experience with mixing these two beasts? I have a GWT 1.5.3 based project that is using GWT-EXT (the old, free/opensource-ish versus that wrapped ExtJS). I'm not talking about GXT or EXT-GWT (yes, I know, confusing names) Roger -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT-EXT and GWT 2.0
How did you find the migration from GWT-EXT to GXT? Do I basically just, well, delete all my views and start over :)? Roger On Jan 30, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Sorinel C wrote: Hi Roger, There you go -- I hope, here: http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2010/01/comparation-ext-gwt-gxt-vs... you can find more info about GWT libraries. Cheers! PS: about your question, I can, for sure, to tell you that GWT1.7.1 + GWT-Ext 2.0.5 work very; though, I don't know about the GWT2.0 'cause in mean time we moved to GXT :-)) -- perhaps this is your next step -- so, book up 2-3 months for you big app migration :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT-EXT and GWT 2.0
Anyone have experience with mixing these two beasts? I have a GWT 1.5.3 based project that is using GWT-EXT (the old, free/opensource-ish versus that wrapped ExtJS). I'm not talking about GXT or EXT-GWT (yes, I know, confusing names) Roger -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
We have multiple modules that are coming from the different providers, there is no way to compile them together as well as GWT compile time grows exponentially, everything works great in PRETTY mode only and there are some method not found exceptions when using Obfuscated or Detailed mode. On Aug 25, 1:22 pm, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: Hi Vlad, I actually misspoke in my previous post - including the two independently compiled modules in your host HTML page should work, although the ideal would still be to combine the two to avoid the redundant boilerplate code from being downloaded a second time and to take advantage of optimizations that come from a monolithic compilation over one codebase. However, if you really need to work with these modules as two separate entities, could you elaborate a little more on the error message you receive or any errors reported in the JavaScript console when using DETAILED or OBF compiled output? Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Vladimir vlad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, I have at least two modules both using GWT-Ext, i include them on the same hosting page with two lines as script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule1.nocache.js/ script script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule2.nocache.js/ script everything works fine in the PRETTY mode but doesn't in the Detailed or Obfuscated it also works fine in hosted mode as well. I world understand if OBF fails but it fails in both OBD and Detailed and no in Pretty. --Vlad On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: Hi Vlad, If I understand correctly, you have one GWT module built with GWT itself, and another module built with GWT-Ext, and you're adding both modules to the same page? If that's the case, I can see how this error could occur, but it's probably not a good idea to develop two independent modules and include them in the same page anyway. You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much snappier application. Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Vlad vlad...@gmail.com wrote: When putting multiple GWT modules on the html host page that use gwt- ext library there is JavaScript error and only in the OBFuscated mode. Everything works just fine in the PRETTY mode. Most likely the error is caused by the name collision in the obfuscated mode when method aa1 () from one module collides with the same obfuscated name from the second one. Basically when first module executes some method there is an error and stack trace reference to the HTML file from the different module. Is there any way to specify some range for JavaScript method names when compiling in the OBFuscated mode via linker etc. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
Hi, ExtGWT --which contains the JS underlying GWTExt - upto 2.0.2-- did a dirty move a year or so ago when they changed their licensing model; as a result there was a falling out between the two projects. Um, ExtJS was underlying GWTExt - no? ExtJS went GPL - no? I guess if you are of a certain ideology then you prefer a BSD type license. Calling moves to the GPL dirty are flame bait I think. Sun went GPL with Java. Why don't you stop programming with Java? Shawn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
Great, another clueless response. um, you are a *Ext* fanboy - no? There's a huge difference between a platform / app server / Java and a library being GPL. A library being GPL means you need you release the source of your entire application, simple. An app server or Java being GPL has absolutely no effect on the licensing and distribution of your application while using GPL library means that you need to release all your code making it unsuitable for use in commercial products. btw where did you read that Java bait and switched to GPL? We were considering using products from the Ext family a long time ago but avoid it like the plague now. Our legal team looked at it and found numerous violations and we did report in on the Ext / ExtGWT forums but the posts were mostly ignored or deleted. For example ExtGWT still uses some code from SWT. SWT is licensed under EPL and EPL is well documented to be incompatible with GPL. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License Since we are no longer planning on using ExtGWT, I have no intentions of burning any more time trying to get them to resolve this. If you are going to make such statements or take a bait, do your homework first. To the original poster : we have decided to go with GWT and GWT incubator widgets and have had excellent results. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, ExtGWT --which contains the JS underlying GWTExt - upto 2.0.2-- did a dirty move a year or so ago when they changed their licensing model; as a result there was a falling out between the two projects. Um, ExtJS was underlying GWTExt - no? ExtJS went GPL - no? I guess if you are of a certain ideology then you prefer a BSD type license. Calling moves to the GPL dirty are flame bait I think. Sun went GPL with Java. Why don't you stop programming with Java? Shawn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
I don't think your response attacking me is productive. I wish you would stop your personal attacks. Please show me where I attacked you personally and I will rephrase it (just consider it a bug). Great, another clueless response. Maybe, maybe not. There's a huge difference between a platform / app server / Java and a library being GPL. A library being GPL means you need you release the source of your entire application, simple. An app server or Java being GPL has absolutely no effect on the licensing and distribution of your application while using GPL library means that you need to release all your code making it unsuitable for use in commercial products. So according to your analysis ExtGWT is unsuitable for commercial products. So what. The authors of ExtGWT are free to release their work under any license they choose. Just because the developers don't see their work serving your purposes...so what. A developer can choose any license they wish for their work. That is what the truth is so why are you calling me names? You somehow believe that ExtGWT developers should only release their work so you can use it in your commercial product. Other developers who are not distributing the ExtGWT library may not feel the same way. For example: A company that modifies open source software released under the GPL is not considered to be distributing (GPL v. 2) or conveying (GPL v. 3) when it runs the modified software as part of collaborative cloud computing. Therefore, the company does not have to contribute the modified software back to the community pursuant to the copyleft clause of the GPL. How about cases where the source code is not modified and the resulting java script is run over a network. Are you asserting that a javascript application run over a network requires that the source for the javascript be made available just because a GPLd library was used in generating the javascript that is run in the clouds. Our legal team looked at it and found numerous violations and we did report in on the Ext / ExtGWT forums but the posts were mostly ignored or deleted. SWT. SWT is licensed under EPL and EPL is well documented to be incompatible with GPL. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License Since we are no longer planning on using ExtGWT, I have no intentions of burning any more time trying to get them to resolve this. Hmmn, let's think about this. The reason they changed in the first place was they had multiple incompatible licenses. You assert they are intending to violate the EPL. I suspect they will rewrite that as soon as they can. If you are going to make such statements or take a bait, do your homework first. Well you can keep using the ExtJS up to what it is 2.0.2 just like they said you could. They haven't changed that at all. They are no longer offering code under that license though. I did my homework. The developers felt that releasing with the type of license that would have been beneficial to you, would have allowed you to take what they felt was unfair advantage of their work. As developers, they choose (right or wrong for the ultimate success of their project) a more restrictive license that they felt was in the best interest of their development. I am sorry you don't agree. The SWT issue surely needs to be worked out but I still fail to see why a developer can not choose to release their new work under a different license than they did in the past. I honestly don't consider that dirty. Ok the developers of ExtGWT thought people were taking advantage of them. You are angry because you can't take advantage of them. Call me clueless all you want but I still fail to see how it makes the ExtGWT developers dirty. Anyway, thank you for your time. All the Best, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
I apologize if you felt that it was a personal attack but truthfully this response of yours really make very little sense. I urge you to read it again with an open mind. What you're saying is that any developer can do anything with their product at anytime and you try to justify their move. Unfortunaltey the software world and licensing does not work that way when there are other libraries with their own licenses to adhere to. Let me quote from the EPL link I provided earlier : The EPL 1.0 is not compatible with the GPL, and a work created by combining a work licensed under the GPL with a work licensed under the EPL cannot be lawfully distributed. On Sep 3, 10:25 am, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: There's a huge difference between a platform / app server / Java and a library being GPL. A library being GPL means you need you release the source of your entire application, simple. An app server or Java being GPL has absolutely no effect on the licensing and distribution of your application while using GPL library means that you need to release all your code making it unsuitable for use in commercial products. So according to your analysis ExtGWT is unsuitable for commercial products. So what. The authors of ExtGWT are free to release their work under any license they choose. Just because the developers don't see their work serving your purposes...so what. A developer can choose any license they wish for their work. That is what the truth is so why are you calling me names? You somehow believe that ExtGWT developers should only release their work so you can use it in your commercial product. Other developers who are not distributing the ExtGWT library may not feel the same way. For example: A company that modifies open source software released under the GPL is not considered to be distributing (GPL v. 2) or conveying (GPL v. 3) when it runs the modified software as part of collaborative cloud computing. Therefore, the company does not have to contribute the modified software back to the community pursuant to the copyleft clause of the GPL. How about cases where the source code is not modified and the resulting java script is run over a network. Are you asserting that a javascript application run over a network requires that the source for the javascript be made available just because a GPLd library was used in generating the javascript that is run in the clouds. Good example! GPL does not require you to distribute your code under such circumstances, however the Ext team put their own spin on how their GPL license should be interpreted. Try posting this very question on the Ext / ExtGWT forum. I guarantee that your post will not get a public response and if you email them you will get a response saying that you will require a license even if you are using their software as part part of collaborative cloud computing which is totally contradictory to what GPL permits. This is the very reason they will not respond in the public forum. Our legal team looked at it and found numerous violations and we did report in on the Ext / ExtGWT forums but the posts were mostly ignored or deleted. SWT. SWT is licensed under EPL and EPL is well documented to be incompatible with GPL. Seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License Since we are no longer planning on using ExtGWT, I have no intentions of burning any more time trying to get them to resolve this. Hmmn, let's think about this. The reason they changed in the first place was they had multiple incompatible licenses. You assert they are intending to violate the EPL. I suspect they will rewrite that as soon as they can. You suspect?? Why do you defend such violations based on speculation and what you think they will do? If you are going to make such statements or take a bait, do your homework first. Well you can keep using the ExtJS up to what it is 2.0.2 just like they said you could. They haven't changed that at all. They are no longer offering code under that license though. I did my homework. The developers felt that releasing with the type of license that would have been beneficial to you, would have allowed you to take what they felt was unfair advantage of their work. As developers, they choose (right or wrong for the ultimate success of their project) a more restrictive license that they felt was in the best interest of their development. Are you part of the Ext / ExtGWT team and speaking on behalf of them? Or simply mind reading? I am sorry you don't agree. The SWT issue surely needs to be worked out but I still fail to see why a developer can not choose to release their new work under a different license than they did in the past. I honestly don't consider that dirty. Let me quote this again for you : The EPL 1.0 is not compatible with the GPL, and a work created by combining a work licensed under the GPL with a work licensed
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
GWTExt is not dead, they're still making maintenance releases, but the lead developer (Sanjiv Jivan) has moved on to SmartGWT. ExtGWT --which contains the JS underlying GWTExt - upto 2.0.2-- did a dirty move a year or so ago when they changed their licensing model; as a result there was a falling out between the two projects. IMO, SmartGWT is the widget library of choice. It's based on a mature Java enterprise client/server technology (SmartClient); seven years of RIA experience; great support, and the project is lead by Sanjiv Jivan. Here's a good discussion of its merits (article goes beyond Groovy): http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/groovyandgrails/introducing-smartgwt-to-grails Regards, Dave On Aug 30, 4:54 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 août, 11:59, muhannad nasser muhannadna...@gmail.com wrote: i wanna choose one of these libraries to start my project... i am searching for a good comparison between those two or any other library that may do the job... GWT-Ext was a *wrapper* around the pure-JS Ext-JS lib, just like SmartGWT is a wrapper around SmartClient (AFAICT); this means that your page will load the whole set of widgets, classes, methods, etc. even those that won't ever be used. Ext-GWT (or GXT) on the other hand is a *port* of Ext-JS over to GWT, which means that only the code you actually use will end in the javascript loaded by the browser. That being said, I haven't ever used any of those libs, so I can't really tell which one to choose... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
i wanna choose one of these libraries to start my project... i am searching for a good comparison between those two or any other library that may do the job... thanks -- ~~~With Regards~~~ Muhannad Dar-Nasser ~~Computer Systems Engineering~~ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
i wanna choose one of these libraries to start my project... i am searching for a good comparison between those two or any other library that may do the job... I think gwt-ext is dead. Ext-GWT was the basis for gwt-ext but Ext-GWT went gpl and gwt-ext got killed. The developers of gwt-ext moved to smartGWT I think. I'm happy with ext-gwt but look at the docs of both smartGWT and ext-GWT. One may be easier for you to start. Also, seach this forum for comparisons of Ext-Gwt and smartGWT. There have been some discussions... The licenses are different too. Ext-Gwt is gpl but smartGWT may be lgpl (double check). Shawn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
thanks Shawn.. :) On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.comwrote: i wanna choose one of these libraries to start my project... i am searching for a good comparison between those two or any other library that may do the job... I think gwt-ext is dead. Ext-GWT was the basis for gwt-ext but Ext-GWT went gpl and gwt-ext got killed. The developers of gwt-ext moved to smartGWT I think. I'm happy with ext-gwt but look at the docs of both smartGWT and ext-GWT. One may be easier for you to start. Also, seach this forum for comparisons of Ext-Gwt and smartGWT. There have been some discussions... The licenses are different too. Ext-Gwt is gpl but smartGWT may be lgpl (double check). Shawn -- ~~~With Regards~~~ Muhannad Dar-Nasser ~~Computer Systems Engineering~~ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ext-GWT vs GWT-ext
On 30 août, 11:59, muhannad nasser muhannadna...@gmail.com wrote: i wanna choose one of these libraries to start my project... i am searching for a good comparison between those two or any other library that may do the job... GWT-Ext was a *wrapper* around the pure-JS Ext-JS lib, just like SmartGWT is a wrapper around SmartClient (AFAICT); this means that your page will load the whole set of widgets, classes, methods, etc. even those that won't ever be used. Ext-GWT (or GXT) on the other hand is a *port* of Ext-JS over to GWT, which means that only the code you actually use will end in the javascript loaded by the browser. That being said, I haven't ever used any of those libs, so I can't really tell which one to choose... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
Hi Vlad, I actually misspoke in my previous post - including the two independently compiled modules in your host HTML page should work, although the ideal would still be to combine the two to avoid the redundant boilerplate code from being downloaded a second time and to take advantage of optimizations that come from a monolithic compilation over one codebase. However, if you really need to work with these modules as two separate entities, could you elaborate a little more on the error message you receive or any errors reported in the JavaScript console when using DETAILED or OBF compiled output? Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Vladimir vlad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, I have at least two modules both using GWT-Ext, i include them on the same hosting page with two lines as script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule1.nocache.js/ script script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule2.nocache.js/ script everything works fine in the PRETTY mode but doesn't in the Detailed or Obfuscated it also works fine in hosted mode as well. I world understand if OBF fails but it fails in both OBD and Detailed and no in Pretty. --Vlad On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: Hi Vlad, If I understand correctly, you have one GWT module built with GWT itself, and another module built with GWT-Ext, and you're adding both modules to the same page? If that's the case, I can see how this error could occur, but it's probably not a good idea to develop two independent modules and include them in the same page anyway. You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much snappier application. Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Vlad vlad...@gmail.com wrote: When putting multiple GWT modules on the html host page that use gwt- ext library there is JavaScript error and only in the OBFuscated mode. Everything works just fine in the PRETTY mode. Most likely the error is caused by the name collision in the obfuscated mode when method aa1 () from one module collides with the same obfuscated name from the second one. Basically when first module executes some method there is an error and stack trace reference to the HTML file from the different module. Is there any way to specify some range for JavaScript method names when compiling in the OBFuscated mode via linker etc. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
Thanks for your reply, I have at least two modules both using GWT-Ext, i include them on the same hosting page with two lines as script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule1.nocache.js/ script script type=text/javascript src=/com.test.Modeule2.nocache.js/ script everything works fine in the PRETTY mode but doesn't in the Detailed or Obfuscated it also works fine in hosted mode as well. I world understand if OBF fails but it fails in both OBD and Detailed and no in Pretty. --Vlad On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: Hi Vlad, If I understand correctly, you have one GWT module built with GWT itself, and another module built with GWT-Ext, and you're adding both modules to the same page? If that's the case, I can see how this error could occur, but it's probably not a good idea to develop two independent modules and include them in the same page anyway. You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much snappier application. Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Vlad vlad...@gmail.com wrote: When putting multiple GWT modules on the html host page that use gwt- ext library there is JavaScript error and only in the OBFuscated mode. Everything works just fine in the PRETTY mode. Most likely the error is caused by the name collision in the obfuscated mode when method aa1 () from one module collides with the same obfuscated name from the second one. Basically when first module executes some method there is an error and stack trace reference to the HTML file from the different module. Is there any way to specify some range for JavaScript method names when compiling in the OBFuscated mode via linker etc. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
File Upload using GWT-EXT FormPanel
Hi all, I want to use file upload facility in my application along with GWT- EXT features. Whatever I serched for File Upload suggests that you should use GWT formPanel along with its submit method, which i am not able to do because of some other fields which i have taken from EXT. Please help me resolving this problem. Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
Hi Vlad, If I understand correctly, you have one GWT module built with GWT itself, and another module built with GWT-Ext, and you're adding both modules to the same page? If that's the case, I can see how this error could occur, but it's probably not a good idea to develop two independent modules and include them in the same page anyway. You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much snappier application. Hope that helps, -Sumit Chandel On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Vlad vlad...@gmail.com wrote: When putting multiple GWT modules on the html host page that use gwt- ext library there is JavaScript error and only in the OBFuscated mode. Everything works just fine in the PRETTY mode. Most likely the error is caused by the name collision in the obfuscated mode when method aa1 () from one module collides with the same obfuscated name from the second one. Basically when first module executes some method there is an error and stack trace reference to the HTML file from the different module. Is there any way to specify some range for JavaScript method names when compiling in the OBFuscated mode via linker etc. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much snappier application. That raises an important architecture question. In our application we are building separate GWT widgets for use on the same web page together with our existing HTML components (its a legacy app). In our case we are using the SmartGWT Tree and List widgets, each in its own div. Does each widget have to load its own copy of GWT and SmartGWT core Javascript libs or can they be downloaded once per page? My concern is that the libs are 500K each which would take some time to download if the user doesnt have broadband. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
GWT1.6.4 multiple module and gwt-ext
When putting multiple GWT modules on the html host page that use gwt- ext library there is JavaScript error and only in the OBFuscated mode. Everything works just fine in the PRETTY mode. Most likely the error is caused by the name collision in the obfuscated mode when method aa1 () from one module collides with the same obfuscated name from the second one. Basically when first module executes some method there is an error and stack trace reference to the HTML file from the different module. Is there any way to specify some range for JavaScript method names when compiling in the OBFuscated mode via linker etc. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
SmartGWT vs GWT-Ext Evaluation
Hi, I am currently evaluating an additional framework on top of GWT for extended UI requirements.I was looking at GWT-Ext, but later decided to look at SmartGWT. But I am concerned about the pricing, I am not sure if it is free opensource or not, although the website says there is a opensource version. but it looks like none of the server side functionalities like database connectors are not available in the opensource version. Since I am new to GWT (even to Java), I am not sure how SmartGWT compares with GWT-Ext. Does it imply that if I use a free version, I will not be able to connect to databases, use server-side validation , etc ( http://www.smartclient.com/product/index.jsp), or am I confusing some additional features with basic specs. All I need is a good GUI for a GWT project. Please help trying to evaluate the correct solution. Regards, Krishna Shasankar http://www.krishnashasankar.com | http://www.clickoffline.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: SmartGWT vs GWT-Ext Evaluation
If you use the free version, you use RestDataSource as the starting point for integration. RestDataSource simply specifies XML or JSON messages to send and receive with your server; it is totally agnostic as to how your server is implemented (it could, for instance, be PHP). http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/javadoc/com/smartgwt/client/data/RestDataSource.html There is also a user-contributed DataSource that works with GWT-RPC: http://forums.smartclient.com/showthread.php?t=4814 If you have follow-up questions, please use the SmartGWT forums, not this one. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: SmartGWT vs GWT-Ext Evaluation
I am also evaluating SmartGWT after a brief stint with GXT. Regarding the GWTRPC code mentioned, it is now part of SmartGWT Extentions. If you are using maven, it's this: dependency groupIdcom.smartgwt/groupId artifactIdsmartgwt-extensions/artifactId version1.0-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency If not, the code is on google code and you can check it out or just grab the jar. It works! And now I am using my own version of a super-genericized example listed on page 7 of that thread: http://forums.smartclient.com/showthread.php?t=4814page=7 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:01 PM, ckendrickcharles.kendr...@gmail.com wrote: If you use the free version, you use RestDataSource as the starting point for integration. RestDataSource simply specifies XML or JSON messages to send and receive with your server; it is totally agnostic as to how your server is implemented (it could, for instance, be PHP). http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/javadoc/com/smartgwt/client/data/RestDataSource.html There is also a user-contributed DataSource that works with GWT-RPC: http://forums.smartclient.com/showthread.php?t=4814 If you have follow-up questions, please use the SmartGWT forums, not this one. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
This last statement seems to contradict it self so to ovoid any confusion (as I and several others I have talked to are confused about this); GXT (Ext-GWT) does NOT use the GPL (License) it uses its own license http://extjs.com/store/gxt/ And it Costs money GWT-EXT does use GPL http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/ And its free for commercial use like (svn, linux, gwt exc) but if you modify it you must post your changes otherwise you will get in trouble with the free software foundation (like cisco did) And now for a quesiton. I know from using Gwt-Ext for a few months that a lot of the code is acutally written in javascript (EXT, and some Flash for its Charts) and GWT-EXT is a GWT adapter to make it work from GWT. What is GXT, is it also this javascript wrapped by a adaptor for GWT? and What is SmartGWT is it also javascript wrapped by a adaptor for GWT? Personally I think that wrapping a bunch of hand written javascript code in the GWT api doesn't make a lot of sense, mostly due to the way it behaves when you work with it. For instance when debugging in Eclipse javascript will throw exceptions that don't get caught by the GWT adaptors, and your exceptions will bounce directly into the Browser stack, causing you hours of frustration. Cheers, Scott On Jun 4, 8:00 pm, Carl Pritchett bogusggem...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding is that GWT-Ext development is halted. An active replacement is SmartGWT (has a free LGPL version). Note that Ext-GWT is not free for commercial use - it uses GPL licensing. I'm currently using it. - Carl. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
Many of these issues are WHY we just got done ripping out all EXT-GWT code out of a large financial app. 1) License issues 2) GWT compatibility ( Widget intermixing, events, exceptions ) 3) LookFeel didn't ( and couldn't be made to ) conform to corporate branding 4) generated javascript size 5) reduce external dependencies 6) rendering speed, especially tables. Financial apps are mostly Table Driven, so I wrote my own friggin Table Widget, an optimized it for our use cases. I can now say the app totally SCREAMS. I have done a few GWT apps for banks, etc, and I can truly say this is one of the fastest I have ever seen. ALL the fancy widget packages were orders of magnitude slower on rendering our data. My table does sorting, paging, selection, and export to Excel is built in. Cells can have custom properties ( alignment, class ) and even override the renderer so a cell can contain a widget. I wrote it, so I understand every line, we own the source, and can extend it... filtering is next on my list. Screens that used to take 7-8 seconds to render now take 1 second, and I still have a few tricks up my sleeve for instance, ( tho this is not working in IE ), this can render a 300x20 grid, with styling and alignment, in 10ms: http://deansjones.appspot.com/ and it is a proper sub-class of Grid. Try that on any of these toolkits ;-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
My understanding is that GWT-Ext development is halted. An active replacement is SmartGWT (has a free LGPL version). Note that Ext-GWT is not free for commercial use - it uses GPL licensing. I'm currently using it. - Carl. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
I started a GWT project and quickly had the need for more widgets than what is provided in the standard SDK. GWT-EXT comes up consistently as a popular library that provides widgets on top of GWT but when digging into the implementation it is clear that it actually is a binding of a Javascript UI library on top of the GWT framework. The situation is tough for developers, it's a bit like the good old days of Java 1.1 / 1.2 when the Netscape IFCs looked so much better than the standard widgets and Swing was in it's infancy. At this point and mostly influenced by the specific project I'm working on I've decided to stick to GWT alone and not use a not-fully-native library on top of it. It was a tough call to make, like every time one has to choose between integrating a 3rd party library that may have long term caveats or building from scratch and taking the hit upfront. - Sylvain On May 31, 8:11 pm, Fitrah Elly Firdaus firdaus.li...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I'm New Member, I want Ask about this, what's differences GWT and GWT-EXT? Which one the best between GWT and GWT-EXT? Regards, Firdaus firdaus_linux.vcf 1KViewDownload --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
My understanding is that GWT-Ext development is halted. Your mileage may be different, but if you are setting up your technology stack, why pick something with no apparent future? It's popular now but when something is not moving at all, other things are bound to catch up and surpass it. We're using Ext-GWT (also known as GXT) and are quite happy with it.We've managed to build a HIGHLY stylized RIA with it such that you'd barely know it was GWT or even GXT for that matter. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
My understanding is that GWT-Ext development is halted. A active replacement is SmartGWT (has a free LGPL version). Note that Ext-GWT is not free for commercial use - it uses GPL licencing. I'm currently using it. - Carl. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
UHM ... that question is a bit confused. GWT is the Toolkit in which GWT-EXT exists. without GWT there is not GWT-EXT. the EXT variants (GWT libraries based on EXT) seem to be rather popular, but also seem to have more than their fair share of detractors. You can search the list for information on the Pros and Cons of using various external Libraries with GWT. That said, I tend to try to stick to straight GWT (and occasionally GWT-Incubator) for my projects. It reduces number of externally induced headaches. But, your situation may be different. Best to create a sample app using the proposed libraries to determine if it is fit for your project. -jason On May 31, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Fitrah Elly Firdaus wrote: Dear All, I'm New Member, I want Ask about this, what's differences GWT and GWT-EXT? Which one the best between GWT and GWT-EXT? Regards, Firdaus firdaus_linux.vcf --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
Please refer: http://gwt-ext.com/ Cheers! Amzad Basha. On May 31, 10:11 pm, Fitrah Elly Firdaus firdaus.li...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I'm New Member, I want Ask about this, what's differences GWT and GWT-EXT? Which one the best between GWT and GWT-EXT? Regards, Firdaus firdaus_linux.vcf 1KViewDownload --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT VS GWT-EXT
Hi, As I see the world, GWT is newer than EXT (javascript library) and a lot more robust. GWT-EXT is a port of EXT so that it works with in the GWT (java souce code) framework. In general they do the same thing, GWT-EXT looks nicer, but GWT is more generally developer friendly. EXT was written by web developers and comes from a web developer mind set (usually modifies the DOM directly), where GWT was written by people who are web developers but have more of a traditional GUI (Swing, SWT, AWT, VB exc) mindset (seems to have the concept of double buffering, or in other words writing to a off screen DOM for things that aren't visible). However on the oppisite argument GWT-EXT has some featurs that are built in to it, that GWT does not yet have. Most notibly Drag and Droping Object between Grids (Tables) and Trees. Sorting in Grids and dragging (reordering) columns in the Ext Grid. Another way of saying this is that the GWT-EXT grid behaves like a swing Table, and the GWT FlexTable behaves more like a swing Grid Bag Layout (for a panel). Answering which one is 'Best' really depends on what your trying to do... Hope this helps, Scott On Jun 1, 6:18 am, Amzad Basha amzad.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Please refer:http://gwt-ext.com/ Cheers! Amzad Basha. On May 31, 10:11 pm, Fitrah Elly Firdaus firdaus.li...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I'm New Member, I want Ask about this, what's differences GWT and GWT-EXT? Which one the best between GWT and GWT-EXT? Regards, Firdaus firdaus_linux.vcf 1KViewDownload --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
GWT VS GWT-EXT
Dear All, I'm New Member, I want Ask about this, what's differences GWT and GWT-EXT? Which one the best between GWT and GWT-EXT? Regards, Firdaus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- begin:vcard fn:Fitrah Elly Firdaus n:Firdaus;Fitrah Elly email;internet:firdaus.li...@gmail.com tel;cell:+6287878443394 version:2.1 end:vcard
GWT EXT compatibilty with GWT 1.6
I have started working with GWT 1.6 and tried to use GWT Ext with it. I configured Ext as i used to do with GWT 1.5 but on startup with 1.6 i get the following java script error Runtime Error Ext is undefined When i ignore the problem the screen loads properly. Any clues. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT EXT compatibilty with GWT 1.6
Thanks it works. On May 14, 2:42 pm, Paul Grenyer paul.gren...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Pints rohitvad...@gmail.com wrote: I have started working with GWT 1.6 and tried to use GWT Ext with it. I configured Ext as i used to do with GWT 1.5 but on startup with 1.6 i get the following java script error Runtime Error Ext is undefined When i ignore the problem the screen loads properly. Setup is rather different with 1.6:http://paulgrenyer.blogspot.com/2009/04/setting-up-gwt-ext-for-gwt-16... -- Thanks Paul Paul Grenyer e: paul.gren...@gmail.com w:http://www.marauder-consulting.co.uk b: paulgrenyer.blogspot.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: problem with TextField of gwt-ext
Deprecated use of gwt.typeArgs for field attributesAllowed; Please use java.util.ArrayListjava.lang.String as the field's type Just do what the warning says: remove the gwt.typeArgs from your rpc declaration and use generic types instead. [ERROR] Unable to load module entry point class com.groupAfricaAward.client.MonApplication (see associated exception for details) com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): '$wnd.Ext.StatusBar' a la valeur Null ou n'est pas un objet. It seems to be a gwt-ext error (it looks like you forgot to include some javascript files, but I'm not sure, I use plain gwt). Maybe you'll have better luck asking in the gwt-ext users' forum (it's an independent project): www.gwt-ext.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1 Hope that helps, Salvador --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Regarding GWT EXT 2.0.6 download
Today I downloaded GWT EXT 2.0.6. But when I unzip the file, the folder which gets extracted to my machine is GWT EXT 2.0.5. I guess the wrong file has been uploaded in the server. Is there any other way to download GWT EXT 2.0.6 ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to create a live suggestion box using GWT-Ext
Hi actually basic combo box in Gwt-Ext is similar to suggestion box in Smart Gwt. I want to know how to implement it in live as done in google. kindly oblige... On Mar 27, 11:42 pm, wouter wouter.behe...@advalvas.be wrote: Can you tell what you already have and where you're stuck ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to create a live suggestion box using GWT-Ext
Can you tell what you already have and where you're stuck ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
to be or not to be... gwt-ext or not thats the question
Hi all, I'm taking a look to the gwt-ext widgets, and ... why I should use thous an not mine? why I should use the ext buttons if I can use the gwt buttons? yeah, Is a fool question , but I'm just a newbie jeje thanks for your support ;)to --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: to be or not to be... gwt-ext or not thats the question
Do you like the way the extGWT buttons look? Do you like the way they behave? Are you or planning to use any of the other functionality/ widgets that extGWT provides? If only for buttons, and if you/your users can live with standard HTML buttons or you want to craft your own...seems like the answer is not. If you want all the features of extGWT in your application, then it's gwtEXT all the way. Good luck! Later, Shaffer On Mar 25, 9:46 am, Juan Francisco Gato Luis jfcog...@gsyc.es wrote: Hi all, I'm taking a look to the gwt-ext widgets, and ... why I should use thous an not mine? why I should use the ext buttons if I can use the gwt buttons? yeah, Is a fool question , but I'm just a newbie jeje thanks for your support ;)to --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: to be or not to be... gwt-ext or not thats the question
It depends on the requirements of your application. If your application has a very rich interface (e.g. a couple of lists and trees with hundreds or maybe thousand of children) then you should consider not using GWT-Ext. I asked myself the same question when I started building my app that at some point reaches 1000-2000 of resizable-draggable-droppable elements. The only solution I have found was to write my own widgets that satisfy that extreme performance. On the other hand, if your application must be very good-looking or you want to provide theme support and has a limited number of widgets then GWT-Ext is the best. On Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:46:49 Juan Francisco Gato Luis wrote: Hi all, I'm taking a look to the gwt-ext widgets, and ... why I should use thous an not mine? why I should use the ext buttons if I can use the gwt buttons? yeah, Is a fool question , but I'm just a newbie jeje thanks for your support ;)to --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Shouldn't everyone stop using GWT-Ext so we can get critical mass in a supported library?
David, I understand your point, it's shame. As soon as enough people start adopting smartGWT, critical mass will be built. I know, for example, the Instantiations group is finishing integrating GWT-Ext into their VisualGWT product (which is a great $60 spend IMO). But Ext-JS will never get better from here in a LGPL format. I am planning for smartGWT. Thanks! On Mar 13, 6:33 am, david peters logicpet...@gmail.com wrote: Ah.. it's not that easy to cast aside GWT-EXT, unfortunately. While SmartGWT is coming along.. it still does not have quite the same polish of EXT. Ext-GWT may be equivalent to GWT-EXT, but the dual- license is restrictive for some environments. Although it's original creator, Sanjiv, may have abandoned the GWT-EXT project, I believe that others have taken it up, although the backend EXT library will never be updated. On Mar 11, 3:20 pm, tv thomas.vilha...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW: I'm looking at starting a GWT project using a widget library add-in. Only after reading for some time did I realize there was some tension between the team that created the Ext JS library and the team that created the GWT-Ext library (that relies on Ext-JS). So now there are two alternatives it seems to me for those that want to carry on using a widget library like this: smartGWT (LGPL or commercial) -or- Ext-GWT (GPL or commercial) I don't have a bias in either one, except that it would be great if there was a clear leader or at least if people stopped developing expertise in GWT-Ext since it is essentially a project that is no longer of interest to its creators. I learn so much from other people's questions on these topics - I would rather see everyone start using a library that will continue to evolve, so we can start helping one another. Is there a better alternative out there? Thanks.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Shouldn't everyone stop using GWT-Ext so we can get critical mass in a supported library?
i think gwt-ext is enough for my application now, although the ext engine will not be update again. if just making CRUD app gwt-ext is enough. Best Regards --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Shouldn't everyone stop using GWT-Ext so we can get critical mass in a supported library?
Ah.. it's not that easy to cast aside GWT-EXT, unfortunately. While SmartGWT is coming along.. it still does not have quite the same polish of EXT. Ext-GWT may be equivalent to GWT-EXT, but the dual- license is restrictive for some environments. Although it's original creator, Sanjiv, may have abandoned the GWT-EXT project, I believe that others have taken it up, although the backend EXT library will never be updated. On Mar 11, 3:20 pm, tv thomas.vilha...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW: I'm looking at starting a GWT project using a widget library add-in. Only after reading for some time did I realize there was some tension between the team that created the Ext JS library and the team that created the GWT-Ext library (that relies on Ext-JS). So now there are two alternatives it seems to me for those that want to carry on using a widget library like this: smartGWT (LGPL or commercial) -or- Ext-GWT (GPL or commercial) I don't have a bias in either one, except that it would be great if there was a clear leader or at least if people stopped developing expertise in GWT-Ext since it is essentially a project that is no longer of interest to its creators. I learn so much from other people's questions on these topics - I would rather see everyone start using a library that will continue to evolve, so we can start helping one another. Is there a better alternative out there? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Shouldn't everyone stop using GWT-Ext so we can get critical mass in a supported library?
FWIW: I'm looking at starting a GWT project using a widget library add-in. Only after reading for some time did I realize there was some tension between the team that created the Ext JS library and the team that created the GWT-Ext library (that relies on Ext-JS). So now there are two alternatives it seems to me for those that want to carry on using a widget library like this: smartGWT (LGPL or commercial) -or- Ext-GWT (GPL or commercial) I don't have a bias in either one, except that it would be great if there was a clear leader or at least if people stopped developing expertise in GWT-Ext since it is essentially a project that is no longer of interest to its creators. I learn so much from other people's questions on these topics - I would rather see everyone start using a library that will continue to evolve, so we can start helping one another. Is there a better alternative out there? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext?
can you give me the link ? On Mar 9, 4:44 am, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I meant those lists/forums smartgwt gwt ext --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext?
hi all, does anybody know what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext? below is extracted from fitlayout of gwt ext: This is a base class for layouts that contain a single item that automatically expands to fill the layout's container. FitLayout does not have any direct config options (other than inherited ones). To fit a panel to a container using FitLayout, simply set layout to FitLayout on the container and add a single panel to it. If the container has multiple panels, only the first one will be displayed. thanks!! /bryan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext?
You might have luck asking on one of the mailing lists/ forums. I think gwtext has a thread about migration. Have you checked there? On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, ytbryan ytbr...@gmail.com wrote: hi all, does anybody know what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext? below is extracted from fitlayout of gwt ext: This is a base class for layouts that contain a single item that automatically expands to fill the layout's container. FitLayout does not have any direct config options (other than inherited ones). To fit a panel to a container using FitLayout, simply set layout to FitLayout on the container and add a single panel to it. If the container has multiple panels, only the first one will be displayed. thanks!! /bryan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: what is the smartgwt equivalent of fitlayout from gwt ext?
Sorry, I meant those lists/forums smartgwt gwt ext --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
