Re: [h-cost] Shirone gown

2009-08-11 Thread Jackie Wyatt

>And as Kass mentions, it is not supposed to lace closed in front. It 
>really is cut that way, tho why I am still not sure.

I've made two of these dresses and I have to agree with Kass's conclusions that 
it is a dress that can be adapted for pregnancy (though I've yet to try it on 
someone who is actually pregnant, darn it!).  The curved line one sees in the 
pictures of the gown are actually the result of two darts which pull up the 
waistline.  Before adding in these darts the waistline is positioned under the 
belly, which is perfect for the increase in size during pregnancy.

Jackie Wyatt


  
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Venetian Carnevale Gown

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Hamilton
Hello All,

I'm a newbie so I beg your patience 

My wife and I are living in Italy for a few years, and have made a
goal to go to Carnevale in Venice next February.

I have undertaken the grand challenge of making costumes for this
event.  Even with my meager sewing skills/experience (a few Halloween
costumes).

I've been searching the web for examples and patterns to work from for
her gown.  But, most of what turns up seems to be French fashion.
Maybe it's true that the French fashion dominated Europe in the 18th
century, esp. the late 18th century, which is the era I'm looking at.
But, is there anything particularly "Italian" or even "Venetian" with
respect dress?

In particular, so far most of what I've found is the "Robe a la
Francese" or sack dress.  I really like the sleeves, with the lace
trim, and the front, with the pointed stomacher and the layered skirts
sweeping open in the front.  But, I really don't like the "sack" part
in the back.  I've looked at patterns for a Robe a la Inglese, and
Polonese, but, really don't like it as much in general.  In
particular, I find the skirt isn't as nice.

I am honestly not totally committed to historical accuracy, but, I'd
like to not embarrass myself, either. I want something that looks good
and withing some realm of reality.  In particular, I'm a little
dubious about having a separate stomacher, rather than something more
one-piece.   I'd even stoop to a back zipper if I had to  (I hear your
gasps of horror and ask for your patience, again).  Part of the reason
is that we are also avid dancers, and look forward to perhaps even a
little waltzing at Carnevale.  We'd like something which is also
movable.  (Although I also know that we're probably talking more
Minuets, and the clothing and dance of the era went hand in hand -
that is, not a lot of raising your hands high above your head wearing
a frock coat, and that wasn't required in Minuets.  But, I
digress).

So, anybody have suggestions on good ideas for this?   Patterns, or
differences between Venetian and general 18th century European (i.e.
French) fasion?  Books?  Even better - web resources?

I'm also hoping to make a frock coat for myself.  At the moment, I'm
working on a set of stays for my wife by J.P. Ryan and Costume
Classroom.  We'll see how far I get in this whole venture.

Any help is greatly appreciated.  Thanks for humoring a newbie.

Best Regards,
Mike
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Venetian Carnevale Gown

2009-08-11 Thread Käthe Barrows
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I'm a newbie so I beg your patience 


No advice at the moment, except to remind you that everyone on this list was
once a newbie.  So you've probably come to the right place.

-- 
Carolyn Kayta Barrows
--
“The future is already here, it is just unevenly distributed.”   -William
Gibson
--
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Shirone gown

2009-08-11 Thread appin1

I too have actually seen the Shinrone gown up close, but did not have the 
opportunity to handle it (I didn't know at the time that I could have just 
asked to do so, and the museum people probably would have said yes), but that 
said, I have some dispute with Kass' interpretation.



Part of the problem is that the gown is displayed on a form that's too big for 
it, so it can't be laced up in front. 



If the gown is indeed dated c. 1600, then there is no reason I know of that it 
would be cut to not lace in front -- all the?contemporary drawings of Irish 
gowns I've seen (both before and after 1600) show the gowns laced closed in 
front. Also, why would a gown not lace? It can get pretty cold and damp in 
Ireland -- what would a woman wear under the gown to keep her warm? 



According to descriptions of the gown, a lot of "restoration" was done to it in 
the 1800s. so we realy don't know how much of the weird stitching, seams, etc 
are Victorian and how much is contemporary. For example, the bodice was 
reinforced back in the 1800s to hold the skirt, which is very heavy.



Look at some of the color illustrations of late 16th century Irish gowns?in 
Dunleavy's Dress in Ireland for comparison. I've made several of those gowns 
and if you unlace them, guess what? They look just like the Shinrone gown.



By the way, has anyone mentioned the little stand-up collar on the center back 
(but not elsewhere) of the bodice? Any ideas what it's for? I'm thinking maybe 
to support a small ruff?



Kathleen Norvell


-Original Message-
From: Kimiko Small 
To: Historical Costume 
Sent: Mon, Aug 10, 2009 4:32 pm
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Shirone gown




Hi Cynthia,

Kass' info on the Shinrone gown is probably the most thorough I know of, as she 
handled the gown herself, and most of the rest I've seen is usually based on 
written descriptions of the garment and two photos in one book (Dress in 
Ireland). I know from having made my own many years ago, before her info came 
out, that the written info is incomplete, and there are unseen & unwritten 
details that Kass describes pretty well.

And as Kass mentions, it is not supposed to lace closed in front. It really is 
cut that way, tho why I am still not sure.

Kimiko




From: Cin 


Ladies (and a few gents),
Have any of you got informative comments to share on the Shirone gown?
I'm looking at the front and wondering whether that placket is
* cut on the straight grain like a Henrican kirtle & distorted with
age, wear and/or burial
* cut on the straight CF but folded back in a slight V for a wider CF
lacing area
* really cut in a curve like that?!
I've read Recontructing History's notes and would like confirming or
contrasting facts, if you have any to share.
Thanks all!
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com


  
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Shirone gown

2009-08-11 Thread Beth and Bob Matney

Cynthia,

I had a chance to examine (through glass) the gown last year in 
Dublin, where it is on display at the Museum of Archaeology. Kass' 
info is good.


My notes:
The Shinrone Gown Late 16th-early 17th century. Museum num. W5.)
displayed on a form with full view of front and limited view of back
of bodice. This dress was found in a bog near Shinrone, County Offaly
in 1843.
The bodice is made from 1 piece of fabric, which is seamed at the
shoulders.  The lower half of the bodice is lined with a piece of the
same fabric.  Skirt is made from 23 pieces sewn together.  Lower hem
measures 6.53m.  Both sleeves would have been secured at the
wrist.  Coarse twill (approx. 1mm thread).  Skirt gathered to bodice.

Unfortunately, the Museum would not allow photos.

Beth


Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:49 -0700
From: Cin 

Ladies (and a few gents),
Have any of you got informative comments to share on the Shirone gown?
 I'm looking at the front and wondering whether that placket is
* cut on the straight grain like a Henrican kirtle & distorted with
age, wear and/or burial
* cut on the straight CF but folded back in a slight V for a wider CF
lacing area
* really cut in a curve like that?!
I've read Recontructing History's notes and would like confirming or
contrasting facts, if you have any to share.
Thanks all!
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Fabric Stores Crystal City? DC?

2009-08-11 Thread Althea Turner
Any recommendations on a fabric store in DC, somewhere near metro? 
Going to the Textile Museum on Thursday. Yay!

Thanks!
Althea

***
Directory of Diverse Knowledge
http://www.alfalfapress.com/sca

Althea Turner
alt...@alfalfapress.com

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] early 17th century stays and bodice

2009-08-11 Thread appin1

I made a jacket very similar to the one shown. It's wool, lined with drill 
(heavy twill-weave cotton -- you could use canvas). I wear no stays under it 
and it looks just like the illustration shown. If you look closely, you can see 
the rounded bottom of the bosom under the jacket. You don't get that look with 
stays. 



Years ago, when I asked Janet Arnold about 17th century corsetry for the middle 
class, she replied that "we just don't know" because there are no extant 
"middle class" 17th century stays.



Kathleen Norvell?


-Original Message-
From: Zuzana Kraemerova 
To: h-costume 
Sent: Sun, Aug 9, 2009 10:38 am
Subject: [h-cost] early 17th century stays and bodice





Hi, I am going to do an early 17th century woman's middle class dress, 
location: 
Bohemia (today's Czech Republic, east of Germany if someone doesn't know), 
time: 
1618-1648. I want it to look like this:

http://link.library.utoronto.ca/hollar/digobject.cfm?Idno=Hollar_k_1716&query=Hollar_k_1716&size=large&type=browse

I have some questions regarding the bodice and stays. First of all, I assume I 
should use stays (I prefer stays to boned bodices). Then, if I use stays, shall 
I do some light boning to the bodice as well? It'll be light wool lined with 
linen. 

I don't really know how shall the stays look like. I have only found this: 
http://www.manchestergalleries.org/the-collections/search-the-collection/image.php?EMUSESSID=bf812423145fbba6ba4d441b7ec2ec13&imageirn=400682&r=51445954
 
from this era, but I'm not sure about the style...I thought I should do some 
traditional type of stays with lacing at the back...do you have any pictures of 
other surviving garments (corsets) from the 1st half of 17th century?

The bodice should be pointed, cut at the waist, probably with tabs, and with 
something like princess seams. I think I should keep to this pattern:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hkoslov/1354051356/in/set-72157601949667448/

For the stays and bodice, but again, it's a bit too late. 

What do you think? Thanks,

Zuzana








  
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] comparison shopping - Tudor Shoes

2009-08-11 Thread A. Thurman
I'm considering two different vendors to finally get myself some
historically accurate Tudor/Elizabethan footwear. The vendors I'm
considering are Pilgrim Shoes in the UK:
http://www.pilgrimshoes.co.uk/ and Armlann in the States:
http://www.armlann.com/.

I've heard good things about the latter, next to nothing about the
former, but I'm interested in their slip-on style which Armlann
doesn't seem to offer. Can anyone offer any anecdotes, experiences
etc. for or against?

Thanks in advance,

A. Thurman
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Fabric Stores Crystal City? DC?

2009-08-11 Thread Cin
Well the best fabrics store in DC is G Street Fabrics, but I dont know if
any of them are near Metro stops.  Certainly Fairfax circle isnt.  I dont
recall where the metro is near 7 Corners or Rockville.
Have fun at the museum. Report back on anything good!
--cin

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Althea Turner wrote:

> Any recommendations on a fabric store in DC, somewhere near metro?
> Going to the Textile Museum on Thursday. Yay!
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Venetian Carnevale Gown

2009-08-11 Thread Carol Kocian

On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:

My wife and I are living in Italy for a few years, and have made a  
goal to go to Carnevale in Venice next February.


 What a wonderful opportunity!

I've been searching the web for examples and patterns to work from  
for her gown.  But, most of what turns up seems to be French  
fashion. Maybe it's true that the French fashion dominated Europe  
in the 18th century, esp. the late 18th century, which is the era  
I'm looking at. But, is there anything particularly "Italian" or  
even "Venetian" with respect dress?


 "Venetian" images tend to be of Carnavale, usually with masks  
and an over-the-top sort of look. They also look a bit fuller to my  
eye, but that may be the fancy dress / costume aspect of them.


In particular, so far most of what I've found is the "Robe a la  
Francese" or sack dress.  I really like the sleeves, with the lace  
trim, and the front, with the pointed stomacher and the layered  
skirts sweeping open in the front.  But, I really don't like the  
"sack" part in the back.  I've looked at patterns for a Robe a la  
Inglese, and Polonese, but, really don't like it as much in  
general.  In particular, I find the skirt isn't as nice.


 You said late century; how late? The popularity of these styles  
changed through the decades.


I am honestly not totally committed to historical accuracy, but,  
I'd like to not embarrass myself, either.


 In that case are you really concerned about a specific historic  
era? You could pick the style of gown you like and embellish it.  
Besides masks, they seemed to use fans and hats to conceal identity.


In particular, I'm a little dubious about having a separate  
stomacher, rather than something more one-piece.


 Stomachers are another aspect of fashion that were in use for  
some years but not the entire century. The benefit of a separate  
stomacher, however, is that the fit of the gown can be adjusted. Also  
you can make more than one and change the look of the ensemble.


I'd even stoop to a back zipper if I had to  (I hear your gasps of  
horror and ask for your patience, again).


 Why in the back? Gowns were front-fastening for the most part,  
so why not do that? Do you have to get in and out of the gown  
quickly? You already said you are making stays. Stays are adjustable  
so the gown needs some flexibility in the fit, too. Even if you used  
hooks & eyes instead of straight pins, you might find they need to be  
moved from year to year.


 -Carol
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Shinrone Gown

2009-08-11 Thread Regina Voorhes
I've been staring at the few pictures that exist for 25 years, and have
discussed it with several people who have seen it in person.  (I,
unfortunately, am probably the person who knows the most about 16th C. Irish
clothes who hasn't actually been TO Ireland.  Just imagine what I will know
after I've been there.  Someday...)

Draw a line from 15th C. V-necked gowns, to the German "Cranach" dress.
Luke Gernon noted, in the 1620s, that they (Irish women) "*They have
straight bodyes, and long wasts, but theyre bodyes come no closer but to the
middle of the ribbe, the rest is supplyed with lacing, from the topp of
their breasts, to the bottome of theyre **plackett, the ordinary sort have
only theyr smockes between, but the better sort have a silke scarfe about
theyre neck, which they spead and pinne over theyre breasts. "
*
The photos available show the dress on a manequin of the wrong size and
shape.  The front opening in the skirt should be closed at the bottom of the
bodice, leaving a U-shaped opening in the bodice.  No one has mentioned the
shape of the front piece, but as there is not evidence remaining of the
fastening of the bodice, the original closure was not under tension and so
was probably, like most other garments of the time, worn over another
garment laced closed for support.  I believe the shape of the edge is due to
its storage on an ill-fitting dummy.

Do check Kass' site for her observations.  She did actually get to measure
the garment.


Regina Lawson Voorhes
Historical Clothing Coordinator
Clan MacColin of Glenderry
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume