Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Cin
*giggle*
My husband had a similar issue with an English loan-word in Toyko. In
Japan, many items, not just clothing, of Western origin have
Japanese-ified names.  For example, "aparto" is apartment, and
"co-hee" is coffee.  My spouse asked the concierge at one hotel desk
if they could have his "pant-su" ironed.  Unfortunately, as in the UK,
he didnt mean *that*.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Beteena Paradise
 wrote:
> We recently moved back to the US after living in the UK for five years. While 
> there, I never got used to the word "pants" meaning underwear. It was very 
> embarrassing when we went into a Starbucks out of a downpour where the water 
> had come up to my ankles. I turned with disgust to my husband and said, "My 
> pants are soaking wet!!" Several people turned my way and just stared. I 
> said, "Trousers! I meant trousers!" but it was too late. ;-) LOL
>
> Teena

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Beteena Paradise
We recently moved back to the US after living in the UK for five years. While 
there, I never got used to the word "pants" meaning underwear. It was very 
embarrassing when we went into a Starbucks out of a downpour where the water 
had come up to my ankles. I turned with disgust to my husband and said, "My 
pants are soaking wet!!" Several people turned my way and just stared. I said, 
"Trousers! I meant trousers!" but it was too late. ;-) LOL

Teena



 From: Robin Netherton 
To: Historical Costume  
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants
 
One of my favorite speakers on costume history once began a lecture at an 
international conference by saying, "I considered giving this presentation 
wearing knickers and a vest." The Americans in the audience may have thought 
she had a quirky fashion sense, but the Brits were horrified. The speaker went 
on to discuss the problems of fashion terminology in historical sources.

--Robin

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Cin
*giggle*  Oh, yeah, I remember that, again, it was my mother's era to
say *snigger* clam-diggers.  I never did.  I was too sophisticate a
teenager in the 70s for that sort of thing.  (Yeah, we're from
Virginia, too, tho the Northern part.)
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Sybella  wrote:
> LOL! I'm laughing my butt off over here.
> 'Bella

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Kathryn Pinner  wrote:
>
>> Another name, at least in southeast Virginia, was 'clam diggers'.
>>
>> Kate Pinner
>>
>> Costume & Scenic Design
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Robin Netherton

On 3/20/2013 5:34 PM, Jean Waddie wrote:

But in the UK, certainly modernly,
it's always knickerbockers.  Knickers are female underwear, only.


One of my favorite speakers on costume history once began a lecture at an 
international conference by saying, "I considered giving this presentation 
wearing knickers and a vest." The Americans in the audience may have thought 
she had a quirky fashion sense, but the Brits were horrified. The speaker went 
on to discuss the problems of fashion terminology in historical sources.


--Robin

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] terms or pants

2013-03-20 Thread Julie
>
>
> Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  Terry
> ** definitely 
>


> Tongue stuck firmly in cheek:
> It never changes. Some guy (Charles Worth, for example) decides we all need
> to wear hoop skirts (for example) and we all follow along. I bet it's been
> going on since Mankind first started wearing clothes. And I don't mean only
> women who follow fashion slavishly; men are right in there too. We finally
> figure it out,

**Too true.  Why should I wear what somebody else decides on?


>  I enjoy following fashion trends I really like, but since most trends are
> not historic
> (which to me is pre-1930), I follow many of the historic ones and ignore
> most of the others. Fran

** Exactly.  That's why I sew.  I can make things that look good on me
regardless of what *they* say is in style.  For me, 1920s is modern 
Julie
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Lavolta Press
I look absolutely horrible in both jumpsuits and farmer-style overalls, 
so have never worn either style.  Pity, because farmer overalls can be 
cute, though I've never liked jumpsuits.


Fran
Books on making historic clothing
www.lavoltapress.com

On 3/20/2013 4:24 PM, costumegal66 wrote:

I wore gauchos for my modeling portfolio in 1977 and my husband bought me a red 
corduroy knicker jumpsuit in 1982.  Still have both of them.

Penny Ladnier
The Costume Gallery Websites
Www.costumegallery.com


>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.

 Original message 
From: Lynn Downward 
Date: 03/20/2013  7:08 PM  (GMT-05:00)
To: Historical Costume 
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants
  
Tongue stuck firmly in cheek:

It never changes. Some guy (Charles Worth, for example) decides we all need
to wear hoop skirts (for example) and we all follow along. I bet it's been
going on since Mankind first started wearing clothes. And I don't mean only
women who follow fashion slavishly; men are right in there too. We finally
figure it out, Terry figured it out once she got out of high school. It
takes other people decades to realize that the most up to date fashion
isn't always the one for them. I love people!

And what would we costumers do if no one followed fashion? How could we
tell an 1875 bonnet from an 1885 one?

Lynn

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Terry  wrote:


Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  I had two pairs of
knickers I got in my last year or two of high school--'81 or '82--the kind
with the band just below the knee.  One pair was a tasteful tweed.  The
other was lilac corduroy that I wore with cream colored socks and lavender
shoes.  I actually had two pairs of lavender shoes, but only one pair was
deemed dressy enough for the knickers.  After that, I stopped following
fads...

Terry

-Original Message-
From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On
Behalf Of Sybella

Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
keep it a secret! ;)


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume




___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Lavolta Press
in the 1980s I had green velvet knee breeches/knickers a la Princess 
Diana, and several pairs of (vintage, 20s or 30s) natural linen jodhpurs 
a  la Ralph Lauren. I just thought I'd throw in a mention of the 
jodhpurs, because both styles looked great on me.  I enjoy following 
fashion trends I really like, but since most trends are not historic 
(which to me is pre-1930), I follow many of the historic ones and ignore 
most of the others.


Fran
Lavolta Press
www.lavoltapress.com
www.facebook.com/LavoltaPress

On 3/20/2013 3:57 PM, Terry wrote:

Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  I had two pairs of




___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread costumegal66
I wore gauchos for my modeling portfolio in 1977 and my husband bought me a red 
corduroy knicker jumpsuit in 1982.  Still have both of them.

Penny Ladnier
The Costume Gallery Websites
Www.costumegallery.com


From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.

 Original message 
From: Lynn Downward  
Date: 03/20/2013  7:08 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Historical Costume  
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants 
 
Tongue stuck firmly in cheek:
It never changes. Some guy (Charles Worth, for example) decides we all need
to wear hoop skirts (for example) and we all follow along. I bet it's been
going on since Mankind first started wearing clothes. And I don't mean only
women who follow fashion slavishly; men are right in there too. We finally
figure it out, Terry figured it out once she got out of high school. It
takes other people decades to realize that the most up to date fashion
isn't always the one for them. I love people!

And what would we costumers do if no one followed fashion? How could we
tell an 1875 bonnet from an 1885 one?

Lynn

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Terry  wrote:

> Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  I had two pairs of
> knickers I got in my last year or two of high school--'81 or '82--the kind
> with the band just below the knee.  One pair was a tasteful tweed.  The
> other was lilac corduroy that I wore with cream colored socks and lavender
> shoes.  I actually had two pairs of lavender shoes, but only one pair was
> deemed dressy enough for the knickers.  After that, I stopped following
> fads...
>
> Terry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On
> Behalf Of Sybella
>
> Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
> may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
> distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
> pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
> Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
> keep it a secret! ;)
>
>
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Lynn Downward
Tongue stuck firmly in cheek:
It never changes. Some guy (Charles Worth, for example) decides we all need
to wear hoop skirts (for example) and we all follow along. I bet it's been
going on since Mankind first started wearing clothes. And I don't mean only
women who follow fashion slavishly; men are right in there too. We finally
figure it out, Terry figured it out once she got out of high school. It
takes other people decades to realize that the most up to date fashion
isn't always the one for them. I love people!

And what would we costumers do if no one followed fashion? How could we
tell an 1875 bonnet from an 1885 one?

Lynn

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Terry  wrote:

> Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  I had two pairs of
> knickers I got in my last year or two of high school--'81 or '82--the kind
> with the band just below the knee.  One pair was a tasteful tweed.  The
> other was lilac corduroy that I wore with cream colored socks and lavender
> shoes.  I actually had two pairs of lavender shoes, but only one pair was
> deemed dressy enough for the knickers.  After that, I stopped following
> fads...
>
> Terry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On
> Behalf Of Sybella
>
> Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
> may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
> distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
> pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
> Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
> keep it a secret! ;)
>
>
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Terry
Hey, be loud and proud about your sartorial choices.  I had two pairs of
knickers I got in my last year or two of high school--'81 or '82--the kind
with the band just below the knee.  One pair was a tasteful tweed.  The
other was lilac corduroy that I wore with cream colored socks and lavender
shoes.  I actually had two pairs of lavender shoes, but only one pair was
deemed dressy enough for the knickers.  After that, I stopped following
fads...

Terry

-Original Message-
From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On
Behalf Of Sybella

Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
keep it a secret! ;)


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Jean Waddie
Ah, I remember my New Romantic days, those wonderful black velvet 
knickerbockers and frilly white blouse!  But in the UK, certainly 
modernly, it's always knickerbockers.  Knickers are female underwear, 
only.  The idea of (male) baseball players routinely wearing knickers is 
hilarious!


Jean

On 20/03/2013 21:11, Sybella wrote:

Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
keep it a secret! ;)

Like I said, every time they come back into fashion, there's a new name for
the same recycled style! LOL!

'Bella


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM,  wrote:


There was a short fad for knickers in the mid to late 1970s for women.
Gauchos were another one, loose pants that ended below the knee - sort of
like a split skirt.
For both, you might wear them with a blouse and matching vest.

Culottes were a skirt/shorts combo, just above the knee. They might have a
wide leg or a separate panel for the skirt effect. Sporty, I remember my
mom wearing them for golfing.

Capri pants are high ankle or low calf length, and are currently
fashionable, and were various times back as far as the 1950s. I think of
Audrey Hepburn in them.

Pedal pushers were long-ish shorts, I think just below the knee? But a
regular pants width, not flared and not gathered. I remember them from the
1960s, but could be earlier.

-Carol



On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Sybella  wrote:

In the '80s people called pants that ended just below the knee
"knickers."

Assuming you mean 1980s: I recall "Capri pants" for women,not knickers.


Before that, they were "peddle pushers." And I think there's at least
one
other name for them. "Knee highs," maybe?  It seems every time they come
back into fashion, they are called something else.

Probably, pedal-pushers as that what my mom called the things they
went bicycling in in the 1950s.

Also, Knickers strikes me as something an early 20th c golfer or
upperclass sport hunter (male) might wear.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Lynn Downward
I don't know... When i was five and six I had peddle pushers and felt
pretty cute in the - in the late 1950s. Alas, no bike with which to push
peddles.

I love words and this has been a really interesting topic!
LynnD

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Sybella  wrote:

> LOL! I'm laughing my butt off over here.
>
> Hope, thanks for trying but you can't pull the embarrassment card unless
> you wore them! You have spared yourself a lifetime of shame by not using
> that pattern! :)
>
> "Clam diggers" Great one!!! I'm surprised I forgot that one. It and peddle
> pushers are my favorite names for this horrid, fashion blight!
>
>
> 'Bella
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Kathryn Pinner  wrote:
>
> > Another name, at least in southeast Virginia, was 'clam diggers'.
> >
> > Kate Pinner
> >
> > Costume & Scenic Design
> >
> > Tech. Coord., Kelsey Theatre, MCCC
> >
> > 609-570-3584
> >
> > pinn...@mccc.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants
> >
> > Bella - I won't tell if you won't tell that I actually had a pattern
> > very similar to this one. Like so many other fashionable items that I
> > thought would put me in the cool kid category, I didn't actually ever
> > make them...
> > http://momspatterns.com/inc/sdetail/95681
> >
> > - Hope
> >
> >
> > On 3/20/13 5:11 PM, Sybella wrote:
> > > Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all
> to
> > > keep it a secret! ;)
> > >
> > ___
> > h-costume mailing list
> > h-costume@mail.indra.com
> > http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
> >
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Sybella
LOL! I'm laughing my butt off over here.

Hope, thanks for trying but you can't pull the embarrassment card unless
you wore them! You have spared yourself a lifetime of shame by not using
that pattern! :)

"Clam diggers" Great one!!! I'm surprised I forgot that one. It and peddle
pushers are my favorite names for this horrid, fashion blight!


'Bella



On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Kathryn Pinner  wrote:

> Another name, at least in southeast Virginia, was 'clam diggers'.
>
> Kate Pinner
>
> Costume & Scenic Design
>
> Tech. Coord., Kelsey Theatre, MCCC
>
> 609-570-3584
>
> pinn...@mccc.edu
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants
>
> Bella - I won't tell if you won't tell that I actually had a pattern
> very similar to this one. Like so many other fashionable items that I
> thought would put me in the cool kid category, I didn't actually ever
> make them...
> http://momspatterns.com/inc/sdetail/95681
>
> - Hope
>
>
> On 3/20/13 5:11 PM, Sybella wrote:
> > Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
> > keep it a secret! ;)
> >
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Kathryn Pinner
Another name, at least in southeast Virginia, was 'clam diggers'.

Kate Pinner

Costume & Scenic Design

Tech. Coord., Kelsey Theatre, MCCC

609-570-3584

pinn...@mccc.edu



Subject: Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

Bella - I won't tell if you won't tell that I actually had a pattern
very similar to this one. Like so many other fashionable items that I
thought would put me in the cool kid category, I didn't actually ever
make them...
http://momspatterns.com/inc/sdetail/95681

- Hope


On 3/20/13 5:11 PM, Sybella wrote:
> Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
> keep it a secret! ;)
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Emily Gilbert
The only contribution I can make is that in Arthur Ransome's Swallows 
and Amazons books, written and set in the 1930s, a small boy (Roger) is 
described as wearing knickerbockers.


Emily


On 3/20/2013 3:05 PM, Hope Greenberg wrote:


Ah the wonderful vagaries of fashion terms. Here's what I believe the 
evolution is:


18th and early 19th century: the general term for pants that end at 
the knee is knee breeches--or just plain breeches (let's not go back 
to Elizabethan trunk hose, etc. now!)


1809: Washington Irving publishes his satirical take on history and 
politics titled A History of New York from the Beginning of the World 
to the End of the Dutch Dynasty, by Diedrich Knickerbocker. The 
frontispiece sports an image of a patrician-looking elder gentleman 
wearing knee breeches. (Irving also begins an amusing hoax related to 
the whereabouts of Mr. Knickerbocker that has the effect of boosting 
sales of the book.)


1810-1840: the name is picked up by the public to refer to New 
Yorkers, particularly gentleman of the old school variety.


1840s: the New York Knickerbockers baseball team is formed. They adopt 
the uniform of a white flannel shirt and blue wool (long!) pants. No 
knickers yet.


mid-19th century: boys wear short pants - not shaped quite like knee 
breeches, but not as baggy as later knickerbockers either. The OED 
dates the use of knickerbocker for the baggy variety dates to 1859. 
And then there's the gentleman's country wear, the knickerbocker suit, 
of the late 1860s-1870s. Let's also throw in the baggy pants developed 
by Amelia Bloomer for the women's dress reform movement which were 
baggy but originally ankle length. They got shorter at the end of the 
century and were especially popular for women bicyclists, in fact the 
OED cites "knickerbocker ladies" as meaning women cyclists. And when 
do baseball uniforms move to shorter baggy pants that are called 
knickerbockers...hmmm...


1872: reference to women's under drawers as knickerbockers, followed 
by 1895 reference to satin knickerbockers. Other references also refer 
to the younger girls drawers as knickers at about this time.


Here's where it gets fuzzy: by WWI the uniform was characterized by 
what we would term knickerbockers. At about the same time, boys by the 
early 20th century boys pants were short and baggy. By the 1920s 
golfers adopted the short baggy look but there's were 4 inches longer 
than knickerbockers, hence the label "plus fours." Knickers were also 
the staple of baseball and football uniforms. And by 1926 we have a 
reference to "French knickers" a British/American term for ladies "tap 
pants" or short, elastic waist, baggy open leg drawers. (Think Busby 
Berkley dancers or 30s film stars underwear.)


They made a come-back in the 1960s after 1950s ankle pants shortened 
to pedal pushers. Knickers were always characterized as baggier and 
drawn in at the knee.



Whew! There you have it--what a fun look at this garment. Oh, but back 
to your original question: it looks like knickers would not be the 
correct term for any knee-length garment before the late 1850s.


- Hope






War days.
Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in




___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Hope Greenberg


Bella - I won't tell if you won't tell that I actually had a pattern 
very similar to this one. Like so many other fashionable items that I 
thought would put me in the cool kid category, I didn't actually ever 
make them...

http://momspatterns.com/inc/sdetail/95681

- Hope


On 3/20/13 5:11 PM, Sybella wrote:

Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
keep it a secret! ;)



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread Sybella
Yes, I did mean the 1980s and "capri" is another one, Cynthia!  And Carol
may be right, where my memories blended '70s with the '80s...but I do
distinctly remember asking Mom to take me shopping for a pair of knickers,
pants that came to a gather just below the knee, during my childhood.
Honestly, it's something I'd rather not admit to so I'll trust you all to
keep it a secret! ;)

Like I said, every time they come back into fashion, there's a new name for
the same recycled style! LOL!

'Bella


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM,  wrote:

> There was a short fad for knickers in the mid to late 1970s for women.
> Gauchos were another one, loose pants that ended below the knee - sort of
> like a split skirt.
> For both, you might wear them with a blouse and matching vest.
>
> Culottes were a skirt/shorts combo, just above the knee. They might have a
> wide leg or a separate panel for the skirt effect. Sporty, I remember my
> mom wearing them for golfing.
>
> Capri pants are high ankle or low calf length, and are currently
> fashionable, and were various times back as far as the 1950s. I think of
> Audrey Hepburn in them.
>
> Pedal pushers were long-ish shorts, I think just below the knee? But a
> regular pants width, not flared and not gathered. I remember them from the
> 1960s, but could be earlier.
>
> -Carol
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Sybella  wrote:
> >> In the '80s people called pants that ended just below the knee
> >> "knickers."
> >
> > Assuming you mean 1980s: I recall "Capri pants" for women,not knickers.
> >
> >> Before that, they were "peddle pushers." And I think there's at least
> >> one
> >> other name for them. "Knee highs," maybe?  It seems every time they come
> >> back into fashion, they are called something else.
> >
> > Probably, pedal-pushers as that what my mom called the things they
> > went bicycling in in the 1950s.
> >
> > Also, Knickers strikes me as something an early 20th c golfer or
> > upperclass sport hunter (male) might wear.
> > --cin
> > Cynthia Barnes
> > cinbar...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Chris Bertani
Certainly breeches is the correct term for the garments worn as part
of British court dress during the Victorian era.  I'm not sure what
the lower garment of a Norfolk suit is called, though.  A random
advertisement from 1905 refers to hunting breeches, but that's all a
quick search turned up.

-- Chris Bertani
www.goblinrevolution.org/costumes


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:48 AM,   wrote:
> Hello,
>Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party
> sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from my Rev
> War days.
>Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in Victorian
> times?
>Henry Osier
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for pants

2013-03-20 Thread aquazoo
There was a short fad for knickers in the mid to late 1970s for women.
Gauchos were another one, loose pants that ended below the knee - sort of
like a split skirt.
For both, you might wear them with a blouse and matching vest.

Culottes were a skirt/shorts combo, just above the knee. They might have a
wide leg or a separate panel for the skirt effect. Sporty, I remember my
mom wearing them for golfing.

Capri pants are high ankle or low calf length, and are currently
fashionable, and were various times back as far as the 1950s. I think of
Audrey Hepburn in them.

Pedal pushers were long-ish shorts, I think just below the knee? But a
regular pants width, not flared and not gathered. I remember them from the
1960s, but could be earlier.

-Carol


> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Sybella  wrote:
>> In the '80s people called pants that ended just below the knee
>> "knickers."
>
> Assuming you mean 1980s: I recall "Capri pants" for women,not knickers.
>
>> Before that, they were "peddle pushers." And I think there's at least
>> one
>> other name for them. "Knee highs," maybe?  It seems every time they come
>> back into fashion, they are called something else.
>
> Probably, pedal-pushers as that what my mom called the things they
> went bicycling in in the 1950s.
>
> Also, Knickers strikes me as something an early 20th c golfer or
> upperclass sport hunter (male) might wear.
> --cin
> Cynthia Barnes
> cinbar...@gmail.com

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Cin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Sybella  wrote:
> In the '80s people called pants that ended just below the knee "knickers."

Assuming you mean 1980s: I recall "Capri pants" for women,not knickers.

> Before that, they were "peddle pushers." And I think there's at least one
> other name for them. "Knee highs," maybe?  It seems every time they come
> back into fashion, they are called something else.

Probably, pedal-pushers as that what my mom called the things they
went bicycling in in the 1950s.

Also, Knickers strikes me as something an early 20th c golfer or
upperclass sport hunter (male) might wear.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Cin
Modernly, you are correct.  My grandmother was fond of asking if I'd
gotten my "knickers in a twist" if I was angry about something.  This
often happened if I was being sent to my room for beating up a younger
sibling.
--cin
Cynthia Barnes
cinbar...@gmail.com


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Julie  wrote:
> I thought knickers referred to underwear.
> Julie
>
>
>>Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party
>> sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from my
>> RevWar days.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Hope Greenberg


Oh heck, as long as I'm in there, here's the OED entry for breeches:

c. Now always in pl. breeches /?br?t??z/ , or a pair of breeches(perh. 
not so used before 15th c.). /Breeches/ are distinguished from 
/trousers/ by coming only just below the knee, but dialectally (and 
humorously) /breeches/ includes /trousers/.


[/c/1275  (/c/??a1200) La?amon /Brut / (Calig.) 
(1978) l. 8996 Heo..gripen heore cniues. & of mid here breches.
1382 /Bible (Wycliffite, E.V.) / Gen. iii. 7   They 
soweden to gidre leeves of a fige tree, & maden hem brechis.]
/a/1500 in T. Wright & R. P. Wülcker /Anglo-Saxon & Old Eng. Vocab. 
/ (1884) I. 629 /Bracce/, brechys.
1555 W. Waterman tr. J. Boemus /Fardle of Facions / 
i. iv. 41   Some make them brieches of the heares of their heades.
1560 /Bible (Geneva) / Gen. iii. 7 They sewed figge 
tree leaues together, and made themselues breeches.
1591 Spenser /Prosopopoia/ in /Complaints / 211   
His breeches were made after the new cut.
1661 S. Pepys /Diary / 6 Apr. (1970) II. 66 To put 
both his legs through one of his Knees of his breeches.
1785 W. Cowper /Task / i. 10   As yet black breeches 
were not.
17.. /Chestnut Horse /, Dreamed of his boots, his 
spurs, his leather breeches, Of leaping five-barred gates, and crossing 
ditches.
1858 N. Hawthorne /Fr. & Ital. Jrnls. / II. 179 
Their trousers being tucked up till they were strictly breeches.

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Hope Greenberg

On 3/20/13 4:05 PM, Hope Greenberg wrote:
And when do baseball uniforms move to shorter baggy pants that are 
called knickerbockers...hmmm...


Ah-ha - here's one lead: 
http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/timeline_1868.htm


- Hope

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Hope Greenberg


Ah the wonderful vagaries of fashion terms. Here's what I believe the 
evolution is:


18th and early 19th century: the general term for pants that end at the 
knee is knee breeches--or just plain breeches (let's not go back to 
Elizabethan trunk hose, etc. now!)


1809: Washington Irving publishes his satirical take on history and 
politics titled A History of New York from the Beginning of the World to 
the End of the Dutch Dynasty, by Diedrich Knickerbocker. The 
frontispiece sports an image of a patrician-looking elder gentleman 
wearing knee breeches. (Irving also begins an amusing hoax related to 
the whereabouts of Mr. Knickerbocker that has the effect of boosting 
sales of the book.)


1810-1840: the name is picked up by the public to refer to New Yorkers, 
particularly gentleman of the old school variety.


1840s: the New York Knickerbockers baseball team is formed. They adopt 
the uniform of a white flannel shirt and blue wool (long!) pants. No 
knickers yet.


mid-19th century: boys wear short pants - not shaped quite like knee 
breeches, but not as baggy as later knickerbockers either. The OED dates 
the use of knickerbocker for the baggy variety dates to 1859. And then 
there's the gentleman's country wear, the knickerbocker suit, of the 
late 1860s-1870s. Let's also throw in the baggy pants developed by 
Amelia Bloomer for the women's dress reform movement which were baggy 
but originally ankle length. They got shorter at the end of the century 
and were especially popular for women bicyclists, in fact the OED cites 
"knickerbocker ladies" as meaning women cyclists. And when do baseball 
uniforms move to shorter baggy pants that are called 
knickerbockers...hmmm...


1872: reference to women's under drawers as knickerbockers, followed by 
1895 reference to satin knickerbockers. Other references also refer to 
the younger girls drawers as knickers at about this time.


Here's where it gets fuzzy: by WWI the uniform was characterized by what 
we would term knickerbockers. At about the same time, boys by the early 
20th century boys pants were short and baggy. By the 1920s golfers 
adopted the short baggy look but there's were 4 inches longer than 
knickerbockers, hence the label "plus fours." Knickers were also the 
staple of baseball and football uniforms. And by 1926 we have a 
reference to "French knickers" a British/American term for ladies "tap 
pants" or short, elastic waist, baggy open leg drawers. (Think Busby 
Berkley dancers or 30s film stars underwear.)


They made a come-back in the 1960s after 1950s ankle pants shortened to 
pedal pushers. Knickers were always characterized as baggier and drawn 
in at the knee.



Whew! There you have it--what a fun look at this garment. Oh, but back 
to your original question: it looks like knickers would not be the 
correct term for any knee-length garment before the late 1850s.


- Hope






War days.
Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in




___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Sybella
In the '80s people called pants that ended just below the knee "knickers."
Before that, they were "peddle pushers." And I think there's at least one
other name for them. "Knee highs," maybe?  It seems every time they come
back into fashion, they are called something else.

Maybe the term "breeches" is more accurate. However, that term was used 4
or 500 years before Victorian times, so I'm not really sure.

Thanks to the Brits, I do consider "knickers" undergarments, and I do think
the term has been used that way since Victorian times.

Isn't Steampunk simply a style, not an accurate reflection of any true time
period? As I understand it, it takes characteristics from a span of years,
and throws in some extra flare. Since it doesn't really claim to be
historically accurate*, call the trousers whatever you want! :)

*Even the Steampunk fans argue this out. Some say it's Victorian clothes
with technology from another year...some say it's just a literary genre.
See this link:
http://austinsirkin.tumblr.com/post/20317870381/what-is-steampunk-its-come-to-my-attention

This online store calls all the bottoms/pants trousers but they do carry
two that end below the knee. They call them...are you ready...KNICKERS! :)
http://www.steampunkemporium.com/steam.php

'Bella


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Lynn Downward wrote:

> Knickers are short for knickerbockers, from some deep recess of my memory.
> I know they weren't called knee-breeches during Victorian times (except
> maybe by old ladies) but I can't verify they were called knickers.
>
> My theory is that the ladies' underwear term, knickers, came from the name
> of the short trousers worn by men.
>
> Supposition on my part; my library is miles away and I can't remember
> anything solid to back up my comments.
> LynnD
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Julie  wrote:
>
> > I thought knickers referred to underwear.
> > Julie
> >
> >
> > >Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party
> > > sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from
> > my
> > > Rev
> > > War days.
> > >Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in
> Victorian
> > > times?
> > >Henry Osier
> > >
> > >
> > ___
> > h-costume mailing list
> > h-costume@mail.indra.com
> > http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
> >
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Lynn Downward
Knickers are short for knickerbockers, from some deep recess of my memory.
I know they weren't called knee-breeches during Victorian times (except
maybe by old ladies) but I can't verify they were called knickers.

My theory is that the ladies' underwear term, knickers, came from the name
of the short trousers worn by men.

Supposition on my part; my library is miles away and I can't remember
anything solid to back up my comments.
LynnD

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Julie  wrote:

> I thought knickers referred to underwear.
> Julie
>
>
> >Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party
> > sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from
> my
> > Rev
> > War days.
> >Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in Victorian
> > times?
> >Henry Osier
> >
> >
> ___
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread Julie
I thought knickers referred to underwear.
Julie


>Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party
> sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from my
> Rev
> War days.
>Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in Victorian
> times?
>Henry Osier
>
>
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Terms for men's pants

2013-03-20 Thread CC2010Milw
Hello,
   Last Sunday, a friend came to a Steampunk St. Patty's Day party 
sporting knickers. I am in the habit of calling them knee-breeches from my Rev 
War days. 
   Is knickers the correct term for men's knee breeches in Victorian 
times?
   Henry Osier
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume