Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Maor Meir

Regarding the first 3 CDs they are truely Redhat CDs.
The last CD contains redhat updates and a few more things
which are by no means redhat.

I do think we should add an inner cover(at least for the updates CD)
making it abundantly clear, that this CD was not compiled by RedHat but
does contain the RedHat updates(from redhat) and was designed(by haifux)
for use on redhat 9 systems.

I think if we make it clear enough what we did we should be on solid
legal ground.

  Meir.

P.s
 I didn't hear any other sugestions as for what to do with
the CDs.


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Haim Ravia
Read the Red Hat FAQs.

 -Original Message-
 From: Maor Meir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:16 PM
 To: RAVIA
 Cc: Shachar Shemesh; Haifux
 Subject: Re: [Haifux] CD logos
 
 
 
 Regarding the first 3 CDs they are truely Redhat CDs.
 The last CD contains redhat updates and a few more things
 which are by no means redhat.
 
 I do think we should add an inner cover(at least for the 
 updates CD) making it abundantly clear, that this CD was not 
 compiled by RedHat but does contain the RedHat updates(from 
 redhat) and was designed(by haifux) for use on redhat 9 systems.
 
 I think if we make it clear enough what we did we should be 
 on solid legal ground.
 
   Meir.
 
 P.s
  I didn't hear any other sugestions as for what to do with
 the CDs.
 


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Orna Agmon


On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Haim Ravia wrote:

 Read the Red Hat FAQs.


/me is reading the FAQ.

There is nothing unclear about this: The updates CD is not the problem: it
is the three RH cds. We, in this case hamakor, which is the legal body, is
selling CDs, and getting money. It does not matter that we get little
money for it. We are re-distributing RH, with their trademark, which is
what is important here. The code is here to redistribute. But they do not
let us re-distribute the RED HAT ITSELF.

So we can:

1. replace the red hats (e.g. pink tie linux, or ourselves)
In this case, the updates CD will be fine as it is.

2. choose another distro. At this point in time, it would be a headache
with the updates.

3.Break the law. I do not think this is a good option. This is like when
Moore declared that the DVD of Revolution OS will be distributed
un-coded (without CSS), and somebody jumped and said: I can burn it, does
anybody want a copy.

I think we, of all people, should be able to play along, and prove that
you can make money from free software. If people insist on getting the RED
HAT trademark, when they can have the source, then RED HAT deserve the
money. Their trade mark is the one which has earned that. And we are not
here to steal it.

Not covering my behind,

Orna.

--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Maor Meir


On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Orna Agmon wrote:



 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Haim Ravia wrote:

  Read the Red Hat FAQs.
 

 /me is reading the FAQ.

 There is nothing unclear about this: The updates CD is not the problem: it
 is the three RH cds. We, in this case hamakor, which is the legal body, is
 selling CDs, and getting money. It does not matter that we get little
 money for it. We are re-distributing RH, with their trademark, which is
 what is important here. The code is here to redistribute. But they do not
 let us re-distribute the RED HAT ITSELF.

 So we can:

 1. replace the red hats (e.g. pink tie linux, or ourselves)
 In this case, the updates CD will be fine as it is.

OK, how?
we have 300 Redhat CDs, they have the redhat name on logo both
on the outside and in the software on them. Throwing them out
seems like a bad idea.

What did Actcom do with Mandrake? they burned there own Mandrake CDs
didn't they? and last year with the redhat CDs? did we break the law then
as well? we sold Redhat CDs with the redhat name printed on them and
on the software inside.

I am trying to think more of what is right then what is legal(mainly
because I know very little about legal), It is wrong to take credit for
other peoples work, and it is wrong to claim something is someone elses
work when it isn't. I think if we make it clear what we did, we should be
in the right. However if someone has a practical plan for being legal as
well I am listening.

Meir.


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Haim Ravia
Couldn't agree more (although I ache the loss of a potentially good case :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Orna Agmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:54 PM
 To: RAVIA
 Cc: 'Maor Meir'; 'Shachar Shemesh'; 'Haifux'
 Subject: RE: [Haifux] CD logos
 
 
 
 
 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Haim Ravia wrote:
 
  Read the Red Hat FAQs.
 
 
 /me is reading the FAQ.
 
 There is nothing unclear about this: The updates CD is not 
 the problem: it is the three RH cds. We, in this case 
 hamakor, which is the legal body, is selling CDs, and getting 
 money. It does not matter that we get little money for it. We 
 are re-distributing RH, with their trademark, which is what 
 is important here. The code is here to redistribute. But they 
 do not let us re-distribute the RED HAT ITSELF.
 
 So we can:
 
 1. replace the red hats (e.g. pink tie linux, or ourselves)
 In this case, the updates CD will be fine as it is.
 
 2. choose another distro. At this point in time, it would be 
 a headache with the updates.
 
 3.Break the law. I do not think this is a good option. This 
 is like when Moore declared that the DVD of Revolution OS 
 will be distributed un-coded (without CSS), and somebody 
 jumped and said: I can burn it, does anybody want a copy.
 
 I think we, of all people, should be able to play along, and 
 prove that you can make money from free software. If people 
 insist on getting the RED HAT trademark, when they can have 
 the source, then RED HAT deserve the money. Their trade mark 
 is the one which has earned that. And we are not here to steal it.
 
 Not covering my behind,
 
   Orna.
 


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD Logos - we have explicit permission

2003-11-10 Thread Alon Altman

We should prepare a small page saying (a) we give no warranties and (b) This
distribution does not include support (either technical or developer)
services from Red Hat but that such services may be purchased from Red Hat
separately. This page will be given to anyone who buys a CD set.

  Note that we're charging 25NIS for 4 CDs which is the duplication cost
plus less than 5NIS handling cost, which is reasonable.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:

 From http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/page9.html :

 Educational Institutions, Not-For-Profits, Linux User Groups and Affiliated
 Individuals

 If you are an educational institution, a not-for-profit organization, a user
 group, or an individual affiliated with or employed by any of those
 organizations, Red Hat grants you a trademark license with respect to the
 RED HAT mark for use with the non-commercial redistribution of Red Hat®
 Linux® in the form you electronically downloaded it from our FTP site or
 other authorized electronic download sites or as copied from an original
 disk from Red Hat or its authorized distributors (either from the boxed set
 or delivered directly to you by Red Hat or an authorized distributor). We
 consider non-commercial redistribution to be any distribution for which you
 charge no more than the cost of replicating the CD and a reasonable handling
 fee. If any copies are to be distributed to individuals outside your
 organization, either the label or an accompanying printed document must
 indicate that: (a) the distribution is provided without any warranties
 (unless you elect to provide those warranties); and (b) this distribution
 does not include support (either technical or developer) services from Red
 Hat but that such services may be purchased from Red Hat separately. If you
 are making copies available for electronic download from your site, these
 same statements must be prominently displayed prior to any download being
 initiated. (Authorized FTP or Electronic Download Sites, please see below.)
 This permission is not applicable to Red Hat® Enterprise Linux® or any Red
 Hat subscription product.  Of course, you are always permitted to
 redistribute the code without utilizing Red Hat's trademark so long as you
 otherwise comply with the GNU General Public License and Red Hat's Trademark
 Guidelines. Please note that if Red Hat feels that an activity falls outside
 of this limited license or you are not a qualified individual or entity
 under this provision, Red Hat reserves the right to revoke this limited
 license.





-- 
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627  DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--
 -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at
least until we've finished building it.

--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD Logos - we have explicit permission

2003-11-10 Thread Shachar Raindel
This clean the first 3 CDs (we only need to fix the instalee forms
now...). We still need to fix the updates CD.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:

 From http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/page9.html :

 Educational Institutions, Not-For-Profits, Linux User Groups and Affiliated
 Individuals

 If you are an educational institution, a not-for-profit organization, a user
 group, or an individual affiliated with or employed by any of those
 organizations, Red Hat grants you a trademark license with respect to the
 RED HAT mark for use with the non-commercial redistribution of Red Hat®
 Linux® in the form you electronically downloaded it from our FTP site or
 other authorized electronic download sites or as copied from an original
 disk from Red Hat or its authorized distributors (either from the boxed set
 or delivered directly to you by Red Hat or an authorized distributor). We
 consider non-commercial redistribution to be any distribution for which you
 charge no more than the cost of replicating the CD and a reasonable handling
 fee. If any copies are to be distributed to individuals outside your
 organization, either the label or an accompanying printed document must
 indicate that: (a) the distribution is provided without any warranties
 (unless you elect to provide those warranties); and (b) this distribution
 does not include support (either technical or developer) services from Red
 Hat but that such services may be purchased from Red Hat separately. If you
 are making copies available for electronic download from your site, these
 same statements must be prominently displayed prior to any download being
 initiated. (Authorized FTP or Electronic Download Sites, please see below.)
 This permission is not applicable to Red Hat® Enterprise Linux® or any Red
 Hat subscription product.  Of course, you are always permitted to
 redistribute the code without utilizing Red Hat's trademark so long as you
 otherwise comply with the GNU General Public License and Red Hat's Trademark
 Guidelines. Please note that if Red Hat feels that an activity falls outside
 of this limited license or you are not a qualified individual or entity
 under this provision, Red Hat reserves the right to revoke this limited
 license.



 --
 This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
 GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
 Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627  DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
 --
  -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
 Loan-department manager:  There isn't any fine print.  At these
 interest rates, we don't need it.

 --
 Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
 To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Haifux] CD Logos - we have explicit permission

2003-11-10 Thread Haim Ravia
Well,,, I should have read these pages also :( Thanks, Alon. I imagine
Haifux should qualify as a Linux User Group so the changed neede are
adding a printed document with the content described below.

 -Original Message-
 From: Haifux - Haifa Linux Club 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alon Altman
 Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:51 PM
 To: Haifux
 Subject: [Haifux] CD Logos - we have explicit permission
 
 
 From 
 http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/pag
 e9.html :
 
 Educational Institutions, Not-For-Profits, Linux User Groups 
 and Affiliated Individuals
 
 If you are an educational institution, a not-for-profit 
 organization, a user group, or an individual affiliated with 
 or employed by any of those organizations, Red Hat grants you 
 a trademark license with respect to the RED HAT mark for use 
 with the non-commercial redistribution of Red HatR LinuxR in 
 the form you electronically downloaded it from our FTP site 
 or other authorized electronic download sites or as copied 
 from an original disk from Red Hat or its authorized 
 distributors (either from the boxed set or delivered directly 
 to you by Red Hat or an authorized distributor). We consider 
 non-commercial redistribution to be any distribution for 
 which you charge no more than the cost of replicating the CD 
 and a reasonable handling fee. If any copies are to be 
 distributed to individuals outside your organization, either 
 the label or an accompanying printed document must indicate 
 that: (a) the distribution is provided without any warranties 
 (unless you elect to provide those warranties); and (b) this 
 distribution does not include support (either technical or 
 developer) services from Red Hat but that such services may 
 be purchased from Red Hat separately. If you are making 
 copies available for electronic download from your site, 
 these same statements must be prominently displayed prior to 
 any download being initiated. (Authorized FTP or Electronic 
 Download Sites, please see below.) This permission is not 
 applicable to Red HatR Enterprise LinuxR or any Red Hat 
 subscription product.  Of course, you are always permitted to 
 redistribute the code without utilizing Red Hat's trademark 
 so long as you otherwise comply with the GNU General Public 
 License and Red Hat's Trademark Guidelines. Please note that 
 if Red Hat feels that an activity falls outside of this 
 limited license or you are not a qualified individual or 
 entity under this provision, Red Hat reserves the right to 
 revoke this limited license.
 
 
 
 -- 
 This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
 ICQ:1366540 GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt 
 Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627  DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
 --
 
  -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
 Loan-department manager:  There isn't any fine print.  At 
 these interest rates, we don't need it.
 
 --
 
 Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
 To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD Logos - we have explicit permission

2003-11-10 Thread Ez-Aton
On Monday 10 November 2003 13:41, Shachar Raindel wrote:
 This clean the first 3 CDs (we only need to fix the instalee forms
 now...). We still need to fix the updates CD.

The updates CD does not try to be RH Linux, and it is not a modified version 
of RH. It is no more then updates, made by Rh and Haifux, which fit RH.

There is no problem with it.

Ez.


 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
  From
  http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/page9.html :
 
  Educational Institutions, Not-For-Profits, Linux User Groups and
  Affiliated Individuals
 
  If you are an educational institution, a not-for-profit organization, a
  user group, or an individual affiliated with or employed by any of those
  organizations, Red Hat grants you a trademark license with respect to the
  RED HAT mark for use with the non-commercial redistribution of Red Hat
  Linux in the form you electronically downloaded it from our FTP site or
  other authorized electronic download sites or as copied from an original
  disk from Red Hat or its authorized distributors (either from the boxed
  set or delivered directly to you by Red Hat or an authorized
  distributor). We consider non-commercial redistribution to be any
  distribution for which you charge no more than the cost of replicating
  the CD and a reasonable handling fee. If any copies are to be distributed
  to individuals outside your organization, either the label or an
  accompanying printed document must indicate that: (a) the distribution is
  provided without any warranties (unless you elect to provide those
  warranties); and (b) this distribution does not include support (either
  technical or developer) services from Red Hat but that such services may
  be purchased from Red Hat separately. If you are making copies available
  for electronic download from your site, these same statements must be
  prominently displayed prior to any download being initiated. (Authorized
  FTP or Electronic Download Sites, please see below.) This permission is
  not applicable to Red Hat Enterprise Linux or any Red Hat subscription
  product.  Of course, you are always permitted to redistribute the code
  without utilizing Red Hat's trademark so long as you otherwise comply
  with the GNU General Public License and Red Hat's Trademark Guidelines.
  Please note that if Red Hat feels that an activity falls outside of this
  limited license or you are not a qualified individual or entity under
  this provision, Red Hat reserves the right to revoke this limited
  license.
 
 
 
  --
  This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
  GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
  Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627  DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
  -
 - -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
  Loan-department manager:  There isn't any fine print.  At these
  interest rates, we don't need it.
 
  -
 - Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
  To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
 Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
 To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Haim Ravia wrote:

While I have my own reservations regarding the Red Hat policy, let me offer
you the following simple guideline: what is right = what is legal.
 

Not trying to open an old discussion again, but I would like it 
explained again, if you can.

As far as I understand Trademark law - once RedHat decided a given thing 
is called RedHat Linux 9, they have no way of forcing me to use or not 
use it a given way. As long as I'm not trying to attribute the name 
RedHat 9 to something it isn't, there is nothing they can tell me to 
do or not to do. The fact that they have an FAQ does not change that, 
except to agree that certain things are agreed by all to be ok. In 
particular, if their FAQ claims that I cannot do something, or must do 
something only under certain conditions, this claim holds no binding on 
me unless Trademark or Copyright law also says I must get permission 
from them.

Furthermore - RedHat themselves distribute RedHat Linux 9 as free 
downloads from their site, without any accompanying support. As such, it 
is them (the trademark holder) that decided that the specific ISOs can 
be called RedHat Linux 9. Unless copyright law says I cannot 
distribute them (and I think there is a clear consensus here that this 
is not the case), I can distribute them AND call them RedHat Linux 9, 
because that's what they are.

Am I missing something here? Is there even a reason that some HTML page 
on their web site should have a legal holding on me in this case?

I'll just add that I heartily recommend that this be the last time we 
(Hamakor) duplicate any CD that has any trademark owned by RedHat 
related to it (Fedora included - did you know Fedora comes with a EULA? 
It tries to enforce those same things that Trademark law doesn't cover 
via contract. I think RedHat made my list of proprietary software 
vendors now - they sure act like one).

   Shachar

--
Shachar Shemesh
Open Source integration consultant
Home page  resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/


--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-10 Thread Ron Artstein
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:

 Furthermore - RedHat themselves distribute RedHat Linux 9 as
 free downloads from their site, without any accompanying
 support. As such, it is them (the trademark holder) that
 decided that the specific ISOs can be called RedHat Linux 9.
 Unless copyright law says I cannot distribute them (and I think
 there is a clear consensus here that this is not the case), I
 can distribute them AND call them RedHat Linux 9, because
 that's what they are.

 Am I missing something here?

Shachar,

Here's the missing link, as far as I understand it: you're not
distributing abstract code, but rather a physical medium, and
bitwise identity between two media does not make the products
identical, just like molecular identity between two products does
not make them identical. This is why manufacturers of generic
pharmaceuticals are not allowed to use brand names, despite the
fact that their products are exact copies of the original. You
can consider your copies to be a generic distro, identical to
Red Hat in all aspects that are relevant to the user.

I don't understand the legal implications of the trademark
permission for non-profits. I wonder what would happen if a
pharmaceutical company gave a similar exemption, say gave
blank permission to use their brand name to all manufacturers
who distribute the product at-cost in developing countries; I
don't know how this would affect their defense of the trademark
against for-profit generic manufacturers.

-Ron.



--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-09 Thread Adir Abraham
Nice. I'm impressed. Way to go.

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:

 Hi,
   The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
 http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/

   Alon



-- 

Adir Abraham
Technion's Advisors Group and Public PC Farms Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haifa, Israel
ICQ# 1841481
Cel# +972-53-243438, +972-55-481245
KeyID: 0xD8DC85C7  Fingerprint: 138D 8F41 7A06 44A0  3DBB 9DC3 FE8B 2658



-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com
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=dgNP
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-09 Thread Orna Agmon
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:

 Hi,
   The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
 http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/

   Alon



Very pretty. I like the updates design more, though. But- what about RH
wishing people to avoid the usage of the trademark RedHat when
re-distributing it? Is this thing already in order?
Or does this relate only to the Enterprise edition?

Orna.

--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Haifux] CD logos

2003-11-09 Thread Raindel Shachar
Aren't we limited to 3 or 2 colors? I counted few more on that design, and
simple dithering filter will make it look really bad.

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:

 Hi,
 The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
 http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/

 Alon

 --
 This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
 GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
 Key fingerprint =A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
 --
  -=[ Random Fortune ]=-
 Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill.

 --
 Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
 To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]