[Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Connection Problem

2005-05-26 Thread vista

yassir,

I've tested all of u're suggestions but the problem 
still persist:
- telnet 192.168.1.225 9200 works but I loose 
the connection when I enter some characters
- I've disabled the Redhat Firewall
- Kevin, I didn't understand for Cache Mumps, is it 
an implementation of Mon Windows or I have to install it in a Windows CPRS 
client ? (Sorry I have just a medium level in English)
- I've checked my Vista Linux Server, it seems to work without 
problems



[Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Crawford Rainwater
The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in my
honest opinion.

With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that have
tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game plan, most
will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is if you
have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said implementation
that becomes the question. 

FWIW.

--- Crawford
-- 
The Linux ETC Company
368 South McCaslin Boulevard
P.M.B. 146
Louisville, CO 80027 USA
+1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
+1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
+1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
http://www.linux-etc.com

Quoting Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:34:31 -0400
 From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How do I start?
 To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 I am running Debian, and I am very happy with it and loath to change,
being 
 comfortable with it, but since he is just starting out and looking at 
 supporting 40,000,000, maybe something with an Enterprise version
would be a
 
 good thing for him to look at.  
 
 If I were from RedHat or Novell and happened to be reading this list,
I would
 
 be writing him a nice email offering him a free eval copy of the
Enterprise 
 version right now!
 
 On Wednesday 25 May 2005 11:53 am, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
  First, do you have anything you are in love with on your Fedora 2
machine?
 
  If no, why not start by getting yourself an up to date version of
Linux
  version.
 
  Rat Hat and Suse have Enterprise versions.  It have been thinking
that
  might be nice to my feet wet with one of those that a hospital or
perhaps
 a
  practice installing VistA-Office might like to use for that reason
as it
  will have support guaranteed to be available.
 
  Red Hats non-enterprise offspring is Fedora, as you know, and tends
to be
 a
  bit bleeding edge as others more than me have said. (One with a
name
  beginning with a B comes to mind, and my son as well.)
 
  Then there is Suse, and I would like to have someone comment on Suse
as
 you
  can download it for bargain use vs. the Enterprise version.
 
  Also, maybe some know about the quality and depth of the support
available
  to a large enterprise for the other distros.
 
  On Wednesday 25 May 2005 10:27 am, Alberto Odor wrote:
   Well, I'm decided to give OpenVistA as much time as I can. I
downloaded
 a
   lot of stuff yesterday like:
  
   1. OpenVistA VIVA FOIA Gold 20050212.iso
   2. OpenVistA SemiVIVA FOIA Gold 20050212.tar.gz
   3. GT.MAcculturation0.3.iso
  
   I have a Linux Server with Fedora2 I can use as I only use it for
   testing. (Linux is not my strong point)
   I also have a Windows Server and a couple of PCs with WindowsXP I
can
   use.
  
   If you would like to have a DEMO site, how would you start? Please
   elaborate as much as you want to ;)
  
   Once I have a Demo site, I plan to try and make an installation
from the
   VA files on GT.M. (I also have Cache's demo disk - one user
version).
  
   Thanks,
  
   Alberto Odor, MD
   Mexico City
  
  



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


Re: [Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread LD \Gus\ Landis
Hi,

  Re: Linux
  Not too strong, IMO. Anything, no, *everything* outside of the kernel is
  frosting on the cake.

  What you are talking about is what is necessary for a POSIX environmnet,
  (e.g. sh, bash, mv, cp, tar, etc).

  These are not Linux at all.

  They are (usually) part of a Linux distribution as they are part of an
  AIX distribution, OS X distribution, FreeBSD distribution, etc,
  etc, and so forth.

  Linux is just a kernel.  Debian, Knoppix, Red Hat and SuSE, etc are 
  merely software distributions that happen to use the Linux kernel between
  the hardware and the execution environment.

Cheers,
  --ldl

On 5/26/05, Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party of
 the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
 (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things are
 all icing on the cake?
 
 --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
  another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
  enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
  kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in
  my
  honest opinion.
 
  With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that have
  tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game plan,
  most
  will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is if
  you
  have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said implementation
  that becomes the question.
 
  FWIW.
 
  --- Crawford
  --
  The Linux ETC Company
  368 South McCaslin Boulevard
  P.M.B. 146
  Louisville, CO 80027 USA
  +1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
  +1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
  +1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
  http://www.linux-etc.com
 
 
 
 A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. 
 --Benjamin Disraeli
 
 Greg Woodhouse
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
 Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
 Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
 Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 


-- 
LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


Re: [Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Greg Woodhouse
Well, maybe, but without them your Linux box is close to being a usless
hunk of metal.

Now, things like Gnome, KDE, etc., THAT is frosting on the cake (which
is not necessarily a bad thing).

--- LD \Gus\ Landis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
   Re: Linux
   Not too strong, IMO. Anything, no, *everything* outside of the
 kernel is
   frosting on the cake.
 
   What you are talking about is what is necessary for a POSIX
 environmnet,
   (e.g. sh, bash, mv, cp, tar, etc).
 
   These are not Linux at all.
 
   They are (usually) part of a Linux distribution as they are part
 of an
   AIX distribution, OS X distribution, FreeBSD distribution,
 etc,
   etc, and so forth.
 
   Linux is just a kernel.  Debian, Knoppix, Red Hat and SuSE, etc
 are 
   merely software distributions that happen to use the Linux kernel
 between
   the hardware and the execution environment.
 
 Cheers,
   --ldl
 
 On 5/26/05, Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party
 of
  the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
  (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things
 are
  all icing on the cake?
  
  --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or
 (insert
   another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
   enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel,
 the
   kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the
 cake in
   my
   honest opinion.
  
   With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that
 have
   tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game
 plan,
   most
   will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is
 if
   you
   have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said
 implementation
   that becomes the question.
  
   FWIW.
  
   --- Crawford
   --
   The Linux ETC Company
   368 South McCaslin Boulevard
   P.M.B. 146
   Louisville, CO 80027 USA
   +1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
   +1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
   +1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
   http://www.linux-etc.com
  
  
  
  A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
 forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli
  
  Greg Woodhouse
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
  
  ---
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
  Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using
 Yahoo!
  Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your
 own
  Applications - visit
 http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
  ___
  Hardhats-members mailing list
  Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
  
 
 
 -- 
 LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
 Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using
 Yahoo!
 Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
 Applications - visit
 http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 

A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. 
--Benjamin Disraeli

Greg Woodhouse 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

2005-05-26 Thread Cameron Schlehuber
Since it appears there is nothing in the sub-file at 200.07475 in the DD (as
you indicated in your other response where you did ZWR ^DD(200.07475,*)) and
the CERTIFICATION field (which represents the column for that table)
thinks the DD should be there, I think that's what's actually leading to the
error you have.  And since the field is no longer being used for anything, I
suggest you simply use FM's Modify option, select file 200 then field 747.5
and delete it by entering @ at the Name prompt.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Usha
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 9:29 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

When I look at my DATA DICTIONARY entry, this is what I get

GTMd Q^DI
VA FileMan 22.0
Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: 1  LIST FILE ATTRIBUTES
 START WITH WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
  GO TO WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
  Select SUB-FILE:
Select LISTING FORMAT: STANDARD//
Start with field: FIRST// CERTIFICATION
Go to field:
STANDARD DATA DICTIONARY #200 -- NEW PERSON FILE
   MAY 26,[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:54:31
PAGE 1
STORED IN ^VA(200,  (150 ENTRIES)   SITE: HUIVISTA3   UCI: ROU,ROU (VERSION
8.0)


DATA  NAME  GLOBALDATA
ELEMENT   TITLE LOCATION  TYPE

---

200,747.5 CERTIFICATION  QAR2;0 POINTER Multiple #200.07475

  DESCRIPTION:  This field allows you to enter specialties
in
which the practitioner is Board Certified.






200,747.6 BOARD ELIGIBLE QAR4;0 POINTER Multiple #200.07476
 (Add New Entry without Asking)

  DESCRIPTION:  If this applicant is eligible to complete
specialty board exams, enter the area of
specialty.


200.07476,2 VERIFICATION   0;3 SET

  '1' FOR LETTER FROM TRAINING DIRECTOR;
  '2' FOR LETTER FROM SPECIALTY BOARD;
...

Is it that my global is corrupted? How can I rectify it?

Regards
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error


 I would like to know how to chase this down for future reference.  Am I on
the
 right track and now what?  How do I find out more about IOSL?

  This is what I did so far:

 I found the 32nd line after the tag WR in the routine DDSU.m.   the line
with
 the WR tag is 126.  The lines below are 149-159 and there were no line
wraps
 above to screw things up that I could see.  It seems that WR+32 is
probably
 line 157, so WR+32 must count the line with WR as 1, correct?

  W DDH(A0,A4)
  I $D(DDH(ID)) D  S:$D(DUOUT) DIY=U
  . N DDD,DIY,DDSID
  . S DDSID=DDH(ID)
  . S:$D(DDH(ID,1))#2 DDSID(1)=DDH(ID,1)
  . N DDH
  . S:$D(DDSID(1))#2 DDH(ID,1)=DDSID(1) K DDSID(1)
  . S Y=A4
  . S:$D(DDS) DDQ=$S(DY(IOSL-1):IOSL-1,1:DY)_U_$X
  . X DDSID
  Q


 IOSL is not newed and is used early in the routine,and gives me a value,
so I
 assume it is the undefined global variable. This is immediately after I
 started up with D P^DI, which I think wipes the local variables, correct?

 GTMW IOSL
 24

  I asked for that section in the global, I think.

 GTMZWR ^DD(200.07475,.01,0)
 ^DD(200.07475,.01,0)=CERTIFICATION^MP747.9'^QA(747.9,^0;1^Q

 Then   I looked in the Data Dictionary:

 **
 Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
 Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: ^
 Select OPTION: ^
 GTMD Q^DI
 VA FileMan 22.0
 Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
 Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: 1  LIST FILE ATTRIBUTES
  START WITH WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
   GO TO WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
   Select SUB-FILE:
 Select LISTING FORMAT: STANDARD//
 Start with field: FIRST// Certification
 Go to field:
 DEVICE:   TELNET
 STANDARD DATA DICTIONARY #200 -- NEW PERSON FILE
MAY 25,[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]:04:05
PAGE
 1
 STORED IN ^VA(200,  (1154 ENTRIES)   SITE: CAMP MASTER   UCI: VAH,ROU
(VERSION
 8.0)

 DATA  NAME  GLOBALDATA
 ELEMENT   TITLE LOCATION  TYPE
 --
-

 200,747.5 CERTIFICATION  QAR2;0 POINTER Multiple #200.07475

   DESCRIPTION:  This field allows you to enter specialties
in
 which the practitioner is Board Certified.

 200.07475,.01   CERTIFICATION  0;1 POINTER ** TO AN UNDEFINED FILE
**
(Multiply asked)
  LAST EDITED: 

RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

2005-05-26 Thread Mobley, Sharon C.
Lloyd,

Would you please send me your telephone number on a separate e-mail.  

Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lloyd
Milligan
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:03 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

No, but I think there is a path length limitation.  Try it from a short
path, if you are not already doing so.

Lloyd

- Original Message -
From: Thurman Pedigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error


 Is there a special folder to place a KIDS build/transport? I am having
 problems getting VistA to find a KIDS upgrade. The system is VistA
running
 on Cache with Win2K server.

 Thanks,

 thurman

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron Schlehuber
 Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:46 PM
 To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

 One can manually reconstruct things, but it's usually safer (and less
 labor
 if a lot is missing) to create a KIDS build from a reliable account
for
 just
 the components involved then import it.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin
 Toppenberg
 Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 1:33 PM
 To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

 My question, looking at this, is how to go about
 fixing such a problem. I assume a node was blown away
 somehow.  Would it have to be manually reconstructed?

 Kevin

 --- Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Actually, pointing to missing files won't cause the
  problem reported here.
  Fileman does tolerate that.  Having data at
  ^DD(200.07475,.01,nn but not at
  ^DD(200.07475,.01,0) WILL cause such errors.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Gregory
  Woodhouse
  Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:55 AM
  To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error
 
  Fileman is resilient against quite a few potential
  errors, but
  pointing to files not in the DD is not one of them.
 
  ===
  Gregory Woodhouse
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  A practical man is a man who practices the errors
  of his
  forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Gregory Woodhouse
  wrote:
 
   Yes, you're on the right track.
  
   IOSL is one of a number of documented Kernel
  variables that you can
   read about in the online documentation. This one
  is screen
   length, and is ultimately a value set by the
  device handler based
   on the DEVICE file. It is unrelated to the problem
  here.
  
   Notice that this is an invalid pointer, and
  without looking too
   closely, I'd guess that the problem here was an
  attempt to
   dereference it.
  
   ===
   Gregory Woodhouse
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   The whole of science is nothing more than a
  refinement
of everyday thinking.  -- Albert Einstein
  
  
 
 
 
 
 ---
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
  Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create
  apps using Yahoo!
  Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo!
  directly into your own
  Applications - visit
 
 http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
  ___
  Hardhats-members mailing list
  Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 
 
 
 
 ---
  SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the
  easiest way to collaborate
  online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the
  high cost of travel and
  communications. There is no equipment to buy and you
  can meet as often as
  you want. Try it
 
 free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7402alloc_id=16135op=click
  ___
  Hardhats-members mailing list
  Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to 
 collaborate
 online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of
travel
 and
 communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as
often as
 you want. Try it
 free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7402alloc_id=16135op=click
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 

[Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Crawford Rainwater
Just a simple analogy.  I will admit, the Linux kernel by itself would
make things interesting even from a console point of view (to put it
very mildly).  Have to love modular design though, so I want a simple
cake with icing, or shall we go for the quad layer with the works? ;-)

--- Crawford
-- 
The Linux ETC Company
368 South McCaslin Boulevard
P.M.B. 146
Louisville, CO 80027 USA
+1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
+1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
+1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
http://www.linux-etc.com

On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:33 -0700, Greg Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party of
 the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
 (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things are
 all icing on the cake?
 
 --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
  another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
  enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
  kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in
  my
  honest opinion.
  
  With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that have
  tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game plan,
  most
  will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is if
  you
  have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said implementation
  that becomes the question. 
  
  FWIW.
  
  --- Crawford




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread LD \Gus\ Landis
Hi,

  I'm with Crawford, I'll take whatever you give me as a starting point, and
  make the many layered cake I am used to.  I don't really care what kernel
  is under the covers... I am finding the OS X layout a but unusual, so will
  probably go buy the book (OS X for the UNIX user, or whatever it is called).

  I find even with Linux distributions I have to go to the store for my favorite
  things (e.g. GT.m is not there, they are usually a release or two behind in
  Python, etc, etc...).  To date the worst I've had is with the HP-UX 10.20
  systems here at work... They are almost like being back in 1980 with naked
  pre-GNU V7... (but even there my scripts work as is no mods.. that's the 
  point of POSIX!)

Cheers,
  --ldl
On 5/26/05, Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just a simple analogy.  I will admit, the Linux kernel by itself would
 make things interesting even from a console point of view (to put it
 very mildly).  Have to love modular design though, so I want a simple
 cake with icing, or shall we go for the quad layer with the works? ;-)
 
 --- Crawford
 --
 The Linux ETC Company
 368 South McCaslin Boulevard
 P.M.B. 146
 Louisville, CO 80027 USA
 +1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
 +1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
 +1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
 http://www.linux-etc.com
 
 On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:33 -0700, Greg Woodhouse
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party of
  the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
  (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things are
  all icing on the cake?
 
  --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
   another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
   enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
   kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in
   my
   honest opinion.
  
   With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that have
   tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game plan,
   most
   will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is if
   you
   have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said implementation
   that becomes the question.
  
   FWIW.
  
   --- Crawford
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
 Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
 Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
 Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 


-- 
LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


Re: [Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Mark Street
On Thursday 26 May 2005 07:51, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
 Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party of
 the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
 (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things are
 all icing on the cake?

And I for one am glad they are NOT part of the kernel.  Think of the whole 
thing as a model of a distant universe with the kernel in the middle.  It is 
the nature of things.

This is the reason why some in the community refer to Linux as GNU/Linux.

What would 'Linux' be without the GNUutilities and tools wrapped around the 
kernel?  What would any OS be without the universe of utilities wrapped 
around the kernel.  Some kernel's are monolithic, some are micro-kernel 
based  you make the choice.

It is an ever expanding universe of applications, drivers and utilities 
spinning around the kernel  this is referred to as a distribution when 
someone grabs the parts and pieces they want, wrap them around the Linux 
kernel, package them up and release them to the community.  Like a present 
from me to you.

The beautiful thing about GNU and Linux is that one has the 'freedom of 
choice' to do with GNU/Linux what they may.

http://www.gnu.org

 --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
  another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
  enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
  kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in
  my
  honest opinion.

-- 
Mark Street, RHCE
http://www.oswizards.com
--
Key fingerprint = 3949 39E4 6317 7C3C 023E  2B1F 6FB3 06E7 D109 56C0
GPG key http://www.oswizards.com/pubkey.asc


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Greg Woodhouse
Hey...I'm a big fan of modularity. In fact, I'm an OS X user meaning
that I use a sytem built on the Mach microkernel! I appreciate the
point you're making here, and completely agree that it's important to
distinguish between the kernel and the rest of the package. 

I guess it just struck me as a bit odd to refer to minor little things
like a runtime library or a shell as icing on the cake.

--- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just a simple analogy.  I will admit, the Linux kernel by itself
 would
 make things interesting even from a console point of view (to put
 it
 very mildly).  Have to love modular design though, so I want a simple
 cake with icing, or shall we go for the quad layer with the works?
 ;-)
 
 --- Crawford
 -- 
 The Linux ETC Company
 368 South McCaslin Boulevard
 P.M.B. 146
 Louisville, CO 80027 USA
 +1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
 +1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
 +1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
 http://www.linux-etc.com
 
 On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:33 -0700, Greg Woodhouse
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  Well, that might be a LITTLE strong. For example, X11 isn't party
 of
  the kernel, nor is bash, little things like mv, cp, tar, etc., etc.
  (much less libraries like libc). Does that mean that these things
 are
  all icing on the cake?
  
  --- Crawford Rainwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or
 (insert
   another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
   enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel,
 the
   kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the
 cake in
   my
   honest opinion.
   
   With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that
 have
   tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game
 plan,
   most
   will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is
 if
   you
   have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said
 implementation
   that becomes the question. 
   
   FWIW.
   
   --- Crawford
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
 Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using
 Yahoo!
 Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
 Applications - visit
 http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
 

A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. 
--Benjamin Disraeli

Greg Woodhouse 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


[Hardhats-members] Backup/journaling for OpenVista

2005-05-26 Thread theirish
Hello,

Does anyone know if there is a document on journaling and backup for
OpenVista (either generic issues or specifically for GTM platforms?)

Thanks
John

- Original Message - 
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I
start?)


 So am I. Wasn't Unix revolutionary, among other things, becausre of the
 small size of its kernel? I'm as big a fan as anyone of the Do one
 thing and do it well concept.

 --- Mark Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  And I for one am glad they are NOT part of the kernel.  Think of the
  whole
  thing as a model of a distant universe with the kernel in the middle.
   It is
  the nature of things.
 
  This is the reason why some in the community refer to Linux as
  GNU/Linux.
 


 A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli
 
 Greg Woodhouse
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
 Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
 Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
 Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
 ___
 Hardhats-members mailing list
 Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


RE: [Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Bhaskar, KS
Crawford --

Good to hear from you again - you've been quiet for a while!

If you consider Debian to be a family of releases with a common package 
management system and database, rather than just the specific Debian GNU/Linux, 
then doesn't a distribution like Ubuntu (http://www.ubuntulinux.org) count as 
having commercial support (e.g., see 
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/supportoptions/paidsupport and 
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/supportoptions/marketplace)?

Regards
-- Bhaskar

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Crawford Rainwater
Sent:   Thu 5/26/2005 10:24 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: 
Subject:[Hardhats-members] On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I 
start?)
The only difference of doing RedHat and/or SuSE vs. Debian or (insert
another non-commercial distribution name here) is the commercial
enterprise support offered.  As Mark said, Linux is the kernel, the
kernel is Linux.  Distributions are the icing on top of the cake in my
honest opinion.

With that said, there are quite a few folks on the HHs list that have
tried Debian and RedHat variants.  Depending on the end game plan, most
will work for small and large implementations quite well.  It is if you
have the Linux system administrator(s) to handle said implementation
that becomes the question. 

FWIW.

--- Crawford
-- 
The Linux ETC Company
368 South McCaslin Boulevard
P.M.B. 146
Louisville, CO 80027 USA
+1 (303) 604-2550 (voice)
+1 (866) 604-2550 (toll free within the US)
+1 (303) 664-0036 (fax)
http://www.linux-etc.com
winmail.dat

RE: [Hardhats-members] Backup/journaling for OpenVista

2005-05-26 Thread Bhaskar, KS
John --

If there is something that you are looking for which is not in the chapter on 
MUPIP in the GT.M Administration and Operations manual as supplemented by the 
tutorial exercise in the GT.M Acculturation CD, please let me know what that 
is.  Implementing journaling for VistA should not be any different from any 
other GT.M application.

Regards
-- Bhaskar

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Thu 5/26/2005 3:16 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: 
Subject:[Hardhats-members] Backup/journaling for OpenVista
Hello,

Does anyone know if there is a document on journaling and backup for
OpenVista (either generic issues or specifically for GTM platforms?)

Thanks
John
winmail.dat

RE: [Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Bhaskar, KS



-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Street
Sent:   Thu 5/26/2005 9:00 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: 
Subject:Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How 
do I start?)

[KSB] ...snip...

What would a cake be without icing?

[KSB] Less filling and therefore healthier, but maybe not as much fun?  :-)

-- Bhaskar
winmail.dat

Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

2005-05-26 Thread Usha
I tried to modify file attributes to remove CERTIFICATION field, but 

Select OPTION: 4  MODIFY FILE ATTRIBUTES
Do you want to use the screen-mode version? YES// NO

MODIFY WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//



Select FIELD: 747.5  CERTIFICATION
And the system hangs...

Is there any other way?
Usha


- Original Message -
From: Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error


Since it appears there is nothing in the sub-file at 200.07475 in the DD (as
you indicated in your other response where you did ZWR ^DD(200.07475,*)) and
the CERTIFICATION field (which represents the column for that table)
thinks the DD should be there, I think that's what's actually leading to the
error you have.  And since the field is no longer being used for anything, I
suggest you simply use FM's Modify option, select file 200 then field 747.5
and delete it by entering @ at the Name prompt.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Usha
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 9:29 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error

When I look at my DATA DICTIONARY entry, this is what I get

GTMd Q^DI
VA FileMan 22.0
Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: 1  LIST FILE ATTRIBUTES
 START WITH WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
  GO TO WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
  Select SUB-FILE:
Select LISTING FORMAT: STANDARD//
Start with field: FIRST// CERTIFICATION
Go to field:
STANDARD DATA DICTIONARY #200 -- NEW PERSON FILE
   MAY 26,[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:54:31
PAGE 1
STORED IN ^VA(200,  (150 ENTRIES)   SITE: HUIVISTA3   UCI: ROU,ROU (VERSION
8.0)


DATA  NAME  GLOBALDATA
ELEMENT   TITLE LOCATION  TYPE

---

200,747.5 CERTIFICATION  QAR2;0 POINTER Multiple #200.07475

  DESCRIPTION:  This field allows you to enter specialties
in
which the practitioner is Board Certified.






200,747.6 BOARD ELIGIBLE QAR4;0 POINTER Multiple #200.07476
 (Add New Entry without Asking)

  DESCRIPTION:  If this applicant is eligible to complete
specialty board exams, enter the area of
specialty.


200.07476,2 VERIFICATION   0;3 SET

  '1' FOR LETTER FROM TRAINING DIRECTOR;
  '2' FOR LETTER FROM SPECIALTY BOARD;
...

Is it that my global is corrupted? How can I rectify it?

Regards
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Another GTM error


 I would like to know how to chase this down for future reference.  Am I on
the
 right track and now what?  How do I find out more about IOSL?

  This is what I did so far:

 I found the 32nd line after the tag WR in the routine DDSU.m.   the line
with
 the WR tag is 126.  The lines below are 149-159 and there were no line
wraps
 above to screw things up that I could see.  It seems that WR+32 is
probably
 line 157, so WR+32 must count the line with WR as 1, correct?

  W DDH(A0,A4)
  I $D(DDH(ID)) D  S:$D(DUOUT) DIY=U
  . N DDD,DIY,DDSID
  . S DDSID=DDH(ID)
  . S:$D(DDH(ID,1))#2 DDSID(1)=DDH(ID,1)
  . N DDH
  . S:$D(DDSID(1))#2 DDH(ID,1)=DDSID(1) K DDSID(1)
  . S Y=A4
  . S:$D(DDS) DDQ=$S(DY(IOSL-1):IOSL-1,1:DY)_U_$X
  . X DDSID
  Q


 IOSL is not newed and is used early in the routine,and gives me a value,
so I
 assume it is the undefined global variable. This is immediately after I
 started up with D P^DI, which I think wipes the local variables, correct?

 GTMW IOSL
 24

  I asked for that section in the global, I think.

 GTMZWR ^DD(200.07475,.01,0)
 ^DD(200.07475,.01,0)=CERTIFICATION^MP747.9'^QA(747.9,^0;1^Q

 Then   I looked in the Data Dictionary:

 **
 Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
 Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: ^
 Select OPTION: ^
 GTMD Q^DI
 VA FileMan 22.0
 Select OPTION: 8  DATA DICTIONARY UTILITIES
 Select DATA DICTIONARY UTILITY OPTION: 1  LIST FILE ATTRIBUTES
  START WITH WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
   GO TO WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON//
   Select SUB-FILE:
 Select LISTING FORMAT: STANDARD//
 Start with field: FIRST// Certification
 Go to field:
 DEVICE:   TELNET
 STANDARD DATA DICTIONARY #200 -- NEW PERSON FILE
MAY 25,[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]:04:05
PAGE
 1
 STORED IN ^VA(200,  (1154 ENTRIES)   SITE: CAMP MASTER   UCI: VAH,ROU
(VERSION
 8.0)

 DATA  NAME  GLOBALDATA
 ELEMENT   

[Hardhats-members] Uninstall a patch

2005-05-26 Thread Usha



While registering a patient, the Austin database is 
checked. Wiki says that it can be disabled if the HL*1.6*39 patch is not 
installed. Unfortunately,we have it installed in our system. 

How canthis patch be 
uninstalled?

Regards
Usha



Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: On Linux distributions (was Re: How do I start?)

2005-05-26 Thread Greg Woodhouse
In truth, I'm not terribly surprised.

Of course, I grew up on BSD, so...
--- Mark Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That Mach kernel is FreeBSD UNIX.  Mac OSX is FreeBSD at its core
 with some 
 NeXT BSD code thrown in.
 
 Not to rain on the parade but..
 
 In truth the Mac OSX kernel is not a mircrokernel it never was,
 it is not 
 monolithic kernel either. although it was.  It is a hybrid kernel
 thanks 
 to the Mac engineers.
 
 What would a cake be without icing?
 


A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. 
--Benjamin Disraeli

Greg Woodhouse 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members