[H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Jerry Jones
A co-worker  friend of my wife asked if I would be willing to look at their 
PC. Appearantly they have a bad virus infestation on their PC and have not 
been using an anti-virus program. They have spoke to tech support at Gateway 
and were told that they may be best off backing up their data and 
reformating. I have not seen the PC yet so I don't know how bad it is. I 
have never had to deal with a PC that has a virus and has NO anti-virus at 
all.


I am looking for suggestions of what software tools I should bring with me 
when I go look at the PC. I have a bootable Norton Anti-virus disc and can 
let it scan the PC and try to clean it up. Is there something better that I 
should use? If I do have to reformat and re-install the OS, what is the best 
way to backup the data and not re-infect the PC when the data is restored?






Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jerry Jones wrote:

A co-worker  friend of my wife asked if I would be willing to look at their 
PC. Appearantly they have a bad virus infestation on their PC and have not 
been using an anti-virus program. They have spoke to tech support at Gateway 
and were told that they may be best off backing up their data and reformating. 
I have not seen the PC yet so I don't know how bad it is. I have never had to 
deal with a PC that has a virus and has NO anti-virus at all.


I am looking for suggestions of what software tools I should bring with me 
when I go look at the PC. I have a bootable Norton Anti-virus disc and can let 
it scan the PC and try to clean it up. Is there something better that I should 
use? If I do have to reformat and re-install the OS, what is the best way to 
backup the data and not re-infect the PC when the data is restored?


From a time/value perspective, if you can get them to agree to a reformat 
that is generally what I prefer to do.  Backup their data (Now they have a 
known good backup) and reinstall windows.  This gives you the advantage of 
installing the latest bios/drivers/updates, etc while not worrying about 
remnants of virus infections from installations past.



The amount of time you will spend cleaning the system, rebooting, etc 
rarely justifies doing the cleaning on a system you can just format and 
restore data to instead.



Just make sure you backup all the data they could need.


That said, if you really want to attempt to clean as opposed to 
formatting, you can get yourself a Bart disk and boot from that and run 
your antivirus, or take the drive out and put it into a USB2/Firewire and 
scan it from a known good machine.




Christopher Fisk
--
`That young girl is one of the least benightedly
unintelligent organic life forms it has been my profound
lack of pleasure not to be able to avoid meeting.'

- Marvin's first ever compliment about anybody.


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 02:44 PM 10/02/2006, Jerry Jones wrote:
A co-worker  friend of my wife asked if I would be willing to look 
at their PC. Appearantly they have a bad virus infestation on their 
PC and have not been using an anti-virus program. They have spoke to 
tech support at Gateway and were told that they may be best off 
backing up their data and reformating. I have not seen the PC yet so 
I don't know how bad it is. I have never had to deal with a PC that 
has a virus and has NO anti-virus at all.


Those are the most fun. :)


I am looking for suggestions of what software tools I should bring 
with me when I go look at the PC. I have a bootable Norton 
Anti-virus disc and can let it scan the PC and try to clean it up. 
Is there something better that I should use? If I do have to 
reformat and re-install the OS, what is the best way to backup the 
data and not re-infect the PC when the data is restored?


It would be best to scan the computer without booting the OS, as the 
OS is compromised and may allow proper removal.  At worst, scan from 
Safe Mode.  Better would be to move the hard drive to a known clean 
computer and scan with it's AV.  Or you could use a BartPE CD.


T 



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
I'd also second the backup  reinstall, nothing else is 100% in this day 
 age of things that cloak themselves and not-as-yet detected 
exploits/malware.


In addition I would suggest they rotate all passwords used anywhere and 
consider monitoring their credit reports if they've done any online

transactions.

As to what to backup, everything. What to restore, non-programs (doc, 
pdf, txt, etc...)  then carefully go through them with a up to date AV 
(online) scanner(s). If they are with an ISP offering name brand AV for 
free, install it if reputable otherwise buy one.


Christopher Fisk wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jerry Jones wrote:

I am looking for suggestions of what software tools I should bring 
with me when I go look at the PC. I have a bootable Norton Anti-virus 
disc and can let it scan the PC and try to clean it up. Is there 
something better that I should use? If I do have to reformat and 
re-install the OS, what is the best way to backup the data and not 
re-infect the PC when the data is restored?


From a time/value perspective, if you can get them to agree to a reformat 
that is generally what I prefer to do.  Backup their data (Now they have 
a known good backup) and reinstall windows.  This gives you the 
advantage of installing the latest bios/drivers/updates, etc while not 
worrying about remnants of virus infections from installations past.



The amount of time you will spend cleaning the system, rebooting, etc 
rarely justifies doing the cleaning on a system you can just format and 
restore data to instead.



Just make sure you backup all the data they could need.


That said, if you really want to attempt to clean as opposed to 
formatting, you can get yourself a Bart disk and boot from that and run 
your antivirus, or take the drive out and put it into a USB2/Firewire 
and scan it from a known good machine.




RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 03:20 PM 10/02/2006, Mesdaq, Ali wrote:

Honestly just reformat. If you were to try to clean it you would need to
be versed in rootkit detection and other kernel level skills to even be
remotely able to clean out a partially sophisticated virus. Its just
totally not worth it then you never have the peace of mind you got rid
of all of them.


Man, I'm shocked at the surrender attitude coming from this 
list.  Removing viruses and spyware is possible, and really isn't 
much more time consuming than a reinstall, and is much less time 
consuming than a reinstall plus software install plus configuration 
plus data recovery.  (Especially since data back without virus scan 
makes the reinstall questionable as viruses can hide in apparent data files.



T 



RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:

Man, I'm shocked at the surrender attitude coming from this list.  Removing 
viruses and spyware is possible, and really isn't much more time consuming 
than a reinstall, and is much less time consuming than a reinstall plus 
software install plus configuration plus data recovery.  (Especially since 
data back without virus scan makes the reinstall questionable as viruses can 
hide in apparent data files.


I gave the suggestion on how to do it without the reinstall, I'm just 
saying from the standpoint of someone who does this for family:  You're 
going to run into something that you have to research, that research time 
takes away from time that could be spent socializing/hanging out.



In a business environment, yeah, removal is fine, but as a favor for 
someone, go the full reinstall route IMO, it's more sure thing, less 
gambling on how long it's going to take, and you leave knowing they at 
least have a backup from that day in case there is a disaster after that. 
Plus, you can sit down and watch TV while the thing is running the 
reinstall.



Christopher Fisk
--
Hmmm, look at those eyes.  He's trying to hypnotize me, but not in the
good Las Vegas way.
-- Homer Simpson, Mountain of Madness


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
This is not surrender, it's the current state of things. Why go through 
a process that you can't guaranty?


At least if you backup everything, reformat/reinstall  then restore 
only what is assumed to be data you're narrowing down the field quite 
a bit and also removing the potential for a cloaked active or unknown virus.


If viruses can hide in apparent data files then using your method 
there is even more untrusted files to scan  miss plus the potential for 
active infection cloaking itself.


One way is now a hit-or-miss hack job, the other the proper solution. 
It's not a academic exercise, it's a job, there is no reason to spend 
time and still not be certain you've done the job right.


Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:

At 03:20 PM 10/02/2006, Mesdaq, Ali wrote:

Honestly just reformat. If you were to try to clean it you would need to
be versed in rootkit detection and other kernel level skills to even be
remotely able to clean out a partially sophisticated virus. Its just
totally not worth it then you never have the peace of mind you got rid
of all of them.


Man, I'm shocked at the surrender attitude coming from this list.  
Removing viruses and spyware is possible, and really isn't much more 
time consuming than a reinstall, and is much less time consuming than a 
reinstall plus software install plus configuration plus data recovery.  
(Especially since data back without virus scan makes the reinstall 
questionable as viruses can hide in apparent data files.



T



RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 04:00 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
In a business environment, yeah, removal is fine, but as a favor for 
someone, go the full reinstall route IMO, it's more sure thing, less 
gambling on how long it's going to take, and you leave knowing they 
at least have a backup from that day in case there is a disaster 
after that. Plus, you can sit down and watch TV while the thing is 
running the reinstall.


But if you agree that the removal route isn't safe, then how can you 
guarantee the data?


T 



RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:


At 04:00 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
In a business environment, yeah, removal is fine, but as a favor for 
someone, go the full reinstall route IMO, it's more sure thing, less 
gambling on how long it's going to take, and you leave knowing they at least 
have a backup from that day in case there is a disaster after that. Plus, 
you can sit down and watch TV while the thing is running the reinstall.


But if you agree that the removal route isn't safe, then how can you guarantee 
the data?


Because data is data, it's not executed, it's not stored in registry, it's 
much easier to verify with virus scanning software.


When was the last time you saw a tiff file with a virus?


Christopher Fisk
--
Pop a Poppler in your mouth
When you come to Fishy Joe's
What they're made of is a mystery
Where they come from no one knows
You can pick 'em you can lick 'em you can chew 'em you can stick 'em
If you promise not to sue us you can shove one up your nose.


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
You have better odds on cleaning the data files then you do cleaning an 
entire system. Data alone, unaccessed by the programs that facilitate 
virus delivery makes he data easier to clean. If you can't see that, 
time to step back and see the forest through the trees.


This is not about making statement by not giving up and not bowing 
down to some malware assholes will, it's about getting the job done right.


Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:

At 04:00 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
In a business environment, yeah, removal is fine, but as a favor for 
someone, go the full reinstall route IMO, it's more sure thing, less 
gambling on how long it's going to take, and you leave knowing they at 
least have a backup from that day in case there is a disaster after 
that. Plus, you can sit down and watch TV while the thing is running 
the reinstall.


But if you agree that the removal route isn't safe, then how can you 
guarantee the data?


T



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 04:07 PM 10/02/2006, warpmedia wrote:

One way is now a hit-or-miss hack job, the other the proper 
solution. It's not a academic exercise, it's a job, there is no 
reason to spend time and still not be certain you've done the job right.


I am doing the job right.  Just because you can't get the time down 
to a reasonable level to clean a system doesn't mean it's 
impossible.  It just means you haven't figured it out yet.


T 



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
You've got half of the answer. But even if it had a payload, having not 
been opened with the exploitable program or delivered through a series 
steps would mean it's payload is not executed and MAY be detectable.


In some cases the simple act of how the file 1st delivered to the PC is 
the starting domino and that goes away when remove the resulting 
infection by reformatting, restore only the data  scan it.


Remember people it's not just the payloads that are an issue here, it's 
the chain of events from delivery to infection. That chain can be broken 
 making opening the file the only way to restart the chain of events.



Christopher Fisk wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:


At 04:00 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
In a business environment, yeah, removal is fine, but as a favor for 
someone, go the full reinstall route IMO, it's more sure thing, less 
gambling on how long it's going to take, and you leave knowing they 
at least have a backup from that day in case there is a disaster 
after that. Plus, you can sit down and watch TV while the thing is 
running the reinstall.


But if you agree that the removal route isn't safe, then how can you 
guarantee the data?


Because data is data, it's not executed, it's not stored in registry, 
it's much easier to verify with virus scanning software.


When was the last time you saw a tiff file with a virus?


Christopher Fisk


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 04:30 PM 10/02/2006, warpmedia wrote:
This is not about making statement by not giving up and not 
bowing down to some malware assholes will, it's about getting the 
job done right.


I am doing the job right.  I'm glad that you find reinstallation the 
best route, but it's not the only route, and I find it isn't the 
best.  If the machine is clean at the end, and the customer has a 
functional Windows and programs and all their data, it doesn't matter 
which route you take.  I just hate the idea of reinstalling all those 
apps, creating all the users, and making sure the data is in the right place.


T 



RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)

At 04:27 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
Because data is data, it's not executed, it's not stored in 
registry, it's much easier to verify with virus scanning software.

When was the last time you saw a tiff file with a virus?


What about Word Macros, WMF infections, movie files with embedded code, etc?

T 



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Sam Franc

warpmedia wrote:
This is not surrender, it's the current state of things. Why go through 
a process that you can't guaranty?


At least if you backup everything, reformat/reinstall  then restore 
only what is assumed to be data you're narrowing down the field quite 
a bit and also removing the potential for a cloaked active or unknown 
virus.


If viruses can hide in apparent data files then using your method 
there is even more untrusted files to scan  miss plus the potential for 
active infection cloaking itself.


One way is now a hit-or-miss hack job, the other the proper solution. 
It's not a academic exercise, it's a job, there is no reason to spend 
time and still not be certain you've done the job right.



Aren't you liable to carry the virus with you into the backup?
Sam


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
No it means you are assuming because you find nothing more  no one 
has complained yet. Kind of like an AIDS test, just because it's 
negative doesn't mean a whole lot since it tests for the presence of 
something. Granted that applied both surgical cleaning and data only 
cleanings, but data only is less risky.


Honestly speaking neither method is the true solution. The true solution 
is to dump everything including data for fear of unknown infections but 
that's just not acceptable since most people don't have one much less 
many backups.


Along the same lines, no web server that's been exploited can be trusted 
until wiped, reinstalled and data restored from backups made before the 
exploit. Difference is they tend to have the backups and are not trying 
to pick though an infected store of data.


The worst way to do this is trying to disinfected the whole system. You 
gonna do what you want to do, but it is certainly more risky than the 
other two options.


Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:

At 04:07 PM 10/02/2006, warpmedia wrote:

One way is now a hit-or-miss hack job, the other the proper solution. 
It's not a academic exercise, it's a job, there is no reason to spend 
time and still not be certain you've done the job right.


I am doing the job right.  Just because you can't get the time down to a 
reasonable level to clean a system doesn't mean it's impossible.  It 
just means you haven't figured it out yet.


T



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
I've not said it's the only, just that it's better. You can't be SURE 
it's clean since the executables have been surgically fixed, period.


I'm not trying to be an ass T, it's just that you have no way of BEING 
SURE so limiting what you need to disinfect IS the better way because 
you are assuming on a smaller base of files.


It's seems that the reinstallers are arguing from a less risk posture 
and you are arguing from your ego.


Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:

At 04:30 PM 10/02/2006, warpmedia wrote:
This is not about making statement by not giving up and not bowing 
down to some malware assholes will, it's about getting the job done 
right.


I am doing the job right.  I'm glad that you find reinstallation the 
best route, but it's not the only route, and I find it isn't the best.  
If the machine is clean at the end, and the customer has a functional 
Windows and programs and all their data, it doesn't matter which route 
you take.  I just hate the idea of reinstalling all those apps, creating 
all the users, and making sure the data is in the right place.


T



Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread warpmedia
Yes, but if you are restoring only the data files it's not the same as 
doing a full restore with the executables nor is it like how the 
infected file got there in the 1st place. I've just posted the statement 
that only wiping everything including data and starting from scratch is 
known clean but the worse of 3 methods.


Look at it this way:

1. IE is exploited to both drop  execute an infected file on your system.
2. If you only restore the file on a clean system, it would stay inert 
until you executed it yourself.
3. If you scanned the file now unfettered by it's payload actions, you 
have a better chance of detecting  cleaning it.


Like I said a few posts back, it's the chain of events before the file 
more than user clicked on the file causing infections these days.


Sam Franc wrote:

warpmedia wrote:
This is not surrender, it's the current state of things. Why go 
through a process that you can't guaranty?


At least if you backup everything, reformat/reinstall  then restore 
only what is assumed to be data you're narrowing down the field 
quite a bit and also removing the potential for a cloaked active or 
unknown virus.


If viruses can hide in apparent data files then using your method 
there is even more untrusted files to scan  miss plus the potential 
for active infection cloaking itself.


One way is now a hit-or-miss hack job, the other the proper solution. 
It's not a academic exercise, it's a job, there is no reason to spend 
time and still not be certain you've done the job right.



Aren't you liable to carry the virus with you into the backup?
Sam



RE: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:


At 04:27 PM 10/02/2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
Because data is data, it's not executed, it's not stored in registry, it's 
much easier to verify with virus scanning software.

When was the last time you saw a tiff file with a virus?


What about Word Macros, WMF infections, movie files with embedded code, etc?


See many word macro's that couldn't be cleaned from a removable device 
that could from the machine the macro infected?


We're not blindly putting the data back onto the system, we're scanning 
that, but not worrying about the integrety of the OS because it is known 
good.



Christopher Fisk
--
The fundamental question is: 'Will I be a successful president when it comes
to foreign policy?'  I will be, but until I'm the president, it's going to be
hard for me to verify that I think I'll be more effective.
George W. Bush, June 27, 2000
Comment made in Wayne, Michigan during the presidential campaign.


Re: [H] Suggested tools for helping a friend with bad virus infestation

2006-02-10 Thread Wayne Johnson

At 03:49 PM 2/10/2006, Thane Sherrington (S) typed:
I am doing the job right.  I'm glad that you find reinstallation the 
best route, but it's not the only route, and I find it isn't the 
best.  If the machine is clean at the end, and the customer has a 
functional Windows and programs and all their data, it doesn't 
matter which route you take.  I just hate the idea of reinstalling 
all those apps, creating all the users, and making sure the data is 
in the right place.


In the past 10yrs I've had only 2 machines that I couldn't clean well 
enough  those were machines that lived in the prOn zone.  I did 
re-installs on them at no charge. When I know that they are prOn 
machines I don't mind socking it to them in the wallet for the 
cleanup because usually it means that it's going to take a while.


--+--
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
http://www.wavijo.com