Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: FWIW this will get fixed in the IBM VME in due course. Of course, once we have test metadata... Sorry. I'm foggy this morning - what do you mean by the last sentence? The implication is going over my head... Once we have the ability to add metadata to the test cases, e.g. by using the TestNG annotations that have been discussed, then we can mark this as a test that is known to fail on the RI / VME and not have to decide whether to universally exclude it, or universally include it and remember that it is known to fail on those VMs. Makes perfect sense. Thanks geir Regards, Tim - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: >> FWIW this will get fixed in the IBM VME in due course. Of course, >> once we have test metadata... > > Sorry. I'm foggy this morning - what do you mean by the last sentence? > The implication is going over my head... Once we have the ability to add metadata to the test cases, e.g. by using the TestNG annotations that have been discussed, then we can mark this as a test that is known to fail on the RI / VME and not have to decide whether to universally exclude it, or universally include it and remember that it is known to fail on those VMs. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Alexey Varlamov wrote: > If there are other misunderstandings, I hope we can resolve them privately. Don't do that, I'm enjoying it Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Tim Ellison wrote: Fedotov, Alexei A wrote: Mikhail, Alexey, I have double checked reasoning about H-1309, H-1670. Alexey's solution is good with me, though I see one more option. If RI and J9 have a bug, shouldn't we correct the test in a way it would fail on these VMs? What do you think? Yes. FWIW this will get fixed in the IBM VME in due course. Of course, once we have test metadata... Sorry. I'm foggy this morning - what do you mean by the last sentence? The implication is going over my head... geir Regards, Tim With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Alexey Varlamov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:22 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest Too many Alexe[i|y]s on the list %). [snip] BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks invalid or VM-specific? OK, let me answer this particular question: Yes, the removed check is invalid but passes on some JREs (VMs). In short, top level class permitted to access any members of a nested class, including private ones, while the check expects IllegalAccessException to be thrown. There is a comment in JIRA's description: "1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; " Indeed, the HARMONY-1309 contains exhaustive information, including reference to JLS and Sun's bug database. If there are other misunderstandings, I hope we can resolve them privately. -- Regards, Alexey Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mikhail, I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". Here should be the following text: This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test, they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took many geek/weeks to locate. With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". 2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mikhail, I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I accept that they are not good. I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment prevent getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to fix. Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is to keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different subject, so that other people could notice that discussion and participate Thanks, Mikhail With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest Hi Alexei I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a number of similar comments in other JIRAs) Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- 1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: - [drlvm][unit] Blocks http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM This is a low risk test fix. [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest -- Key: HARMONY-1670 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 Project: Harmony Issue Type: Bug Components: Classlib Reporter: Alexey Varlamov Priority: Trivial Attachments: H-1670.patch The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Cla s sTes t.java checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of private method of inner class. This is bad due to: 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and this is already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira ---
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote: > Mikhail, Alexey, > > I have double checked reasoning about H-1309, H-1670. Alexey's solution > is good with me, though I see one more option. > > If RI and J9 have a bug, shouldn't we correct the test in a way it would > fail on these VMs? What do you think? Yes. FWIW this will get fixed in the IBM VME in due course. Of course, once we have test metadata... Regards, Tim > With best regards, > Alexei Fedotov, > Intel Middleware Products Division > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alexey Varlamov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:22 AM >> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >> testcase in ClassTest >> >> Too many Alexe[i|y]s on the list %). >> >> [snip] >>> BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks >> invalid >>> or VM-specific? >> OK, let me answer this particular question: >> Yes, the removed check is invalid but passes on some JREs (VMs). In >> short, top level class permitted to access any members of a nested >> class, including private ones, while the check expects >> IllegalAccessException to be thrown. >> There is a comment in JIRA's description: >> "1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; " >> Indeed, the HARMONY-1309 contains exhaustive information, including >> reference to JLS and Sun's bug database. >> >> If there are other misunderstandings, I hope we can resolve them > privately. >> -- >> Regards, >> Alexey >>> Thanks, >>> Mikhail >>> >>> 2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Mikhail, >>>> >>>>> I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". >>>> Here should be the following text: >>>> >>>> This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one > test, >>>> they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which > took >>>> many geek/weeks to locate. >>>> >>>> With best regards, >>>> Alexei Fedotov, >>>> Intel Middleware Products Division >>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM >>>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] > invalid >>>>> testcase in ClassTest >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". >>>>> >>>>> 2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>> Mikhail, >>>>>> >>>>>> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I >>>> accept >>>>>> that they are not good. >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment >>>> prevent >>>>>> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for >>>>>> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs > to >>>> fix. >>>>>> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement > is >>>> to >>>>>> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. >>>>> IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with > different >>>>> subject, >>>>> so that other people could notice that discussion and participate >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mikhail >>>>> >>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>> Alexei Fedotov, >>>>>> Intel Middleware Products Division >>>>>> >>>>>>> -Original Message- >>>>>>> From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >>>>>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] >>>> invalid >>>>>>> testcase in ClassTest >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Alexei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well > as a >>>>>>> number of si
RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Mikhail, Alexey, I have double checked reasoning about H-1309, H-1670. Alexey's solution is good with me, though I see one more option. If RI and J9 have a bug, shouldn't we correct the test in a way it would fail on these VMs? What do you think? With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Alexey Varlamov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:22 AM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >testcase in ClassTest > >Too many Alexe[i|y]s on the list %). > >[snip] >> BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks >invalid >> or VM-specific? > >OK, let me answer this particular question: >Yes, the removed check is invalid but passes on some JREs (VMs). In >short, top level class permitted to access any members of a nested >class, including private ones, while the check expects >IllegalAccessException to be thrown. >There is a comment in JIRA's description: >"1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; " >Indeed, the HARMONY-1309 contains exhaustive information, including >reference to JLS and Sun's bug database. > >If there are other misunderstandings, I hope we can resolve them privately. >-- >Regards, >Alexey >> >> Thanks, >> Mikhail >> >> 2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Mikhail, >> > >> > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". >> > >> > Here should be the following text: >> > >> > This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test, >> > they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took >> > many geek/weeks to locate. >> > >> > With best regards, >> > Alexei Fedotov, >> > Intel Middleware Products Division >> > >> > >-Original Message- >> > >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM >> > >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >> > >testcase in ClassTest >> > > >> > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". >> > > >> > >2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> Mikhail, >> > >> >> > >> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I >> > accept >> > >> that they are not good. >> > >> >> > >> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment >> > prevent >> > >> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for >> > >> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to >> > fix. >> > >> >> > >> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is >> > to >> > >> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. >> > > >> > >IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different >> > >subject, >> > >so that other people could notice that discussion and participate >> > > >> > >Thanks, >> > >Mikhail >> > > >> > >> >> > >> With best regards, >> > >> Alexei Fedotov, >> > >> Intel Middleware Products Division >> > >> >> > >> >-Original Message- >> > >> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >> > >> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] >> > invalid >> > >> >testcase in ClassTest >> > >> > >> > >> >Hi Alexei >> > >> > >> > >> >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a >> > >> >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) >> > >> > >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> >Mikhail >> > >> > >> > >> >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- >> > >> >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] >> > >> >> >> >
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Too many Alexe[i|y]s on the list %). [snip] BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks invalid or VM-specific? OK, let me answer this particular question: Yes, the removed check is invalid but passes on some JREs (VMs). In short, top level class permitted to access any members of a nested class, including private ones, while the check expects IllegalAccessException to be thrown. There is a comment in JIRA's description: "1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; " Indeed, the HARMONY-1309 contains exhaustive information, including reference to JLS and Sun's bug database. If there are other misunderstandings, I hope we can resolve them privately. -- Regards, Alexey Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mikhail, > > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". > > Here should be the following text: > > This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test, > they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took > many geek/weeks to locate. > > With best regards, > Alexei Fedotov, > Intel Middleware Products Division > > >-Original Message- > >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM > >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid > >testcase in ClassTest > > > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". > > > >2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Mikhail, > >> > >> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I > accept > >> that they are not good. > >> > >> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment > prevent > >> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for > >> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to > fix. > >> > >> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is > to > >> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. > > > >IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different > >subject, > >so that other people could notice that discussion and participate > > > >Thanks, > >Mikhail > > > >> > >> With best regards, > >> Alexei Fedotov, > >> Intel Middleware Products Division > >> > >> >-Original Message- > >> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM > >> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] > invalid > >> >testcase in ClassTest > >> > > >> >Hi Alexei > >> > > >> >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a > >> >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >Mikhail > >> > > >> >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- > >> >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] > >> >> > >> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: > >> >> - > >> >> > >> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks > >> >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM > >> >> > >> >> This is a low risk test fix. > >> >> > >> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest > >> >> > -- > >> >> > > >> >> > Key: HARMONY-1670 > >> >> > URL: > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 > >> >> > Project: Harmony > >> >> > Issue Type: Bug > >> >> > Components: Classlib > >> >> >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov > >> >> >Priority: Trivial > >> >> > Attachments: H-1670.patch > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of > >> > >modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas > >> sTes > >> >t.java > >> >> > checks if Illeg
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Sorry, I probably need more coffee. What is "This" ? Do you mean that you have reviewed the patch previously attached by Alexey V. and found it good enough? BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks invalid or VM-specific? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mikhail, >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". Here should be the following text: This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test, they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took many geek/weeks to locate. With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >testcase in ClassTest > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". > >2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Mikhail, >> >> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I accept >> that they are not good. >> >> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment prevent >> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for >> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to fix. >> >> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is to >> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. > >IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different >subject, >so that other people could notice that discussion and participate > >Thanks, >Mikhail > >> >> With best regards, >> Alexei Fedotov, >> Intel Middleware Products Division >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >> >testcase in ClassTest >> > >> >Hi Alexei >> > >> >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a >> >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Mikhail >> > >> >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- >> >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] >> >> >> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: >> >> - >> >> >> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks >> >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM >> >> >> >> This is a low risk test fix. >> >> >> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > Key: HARMONY-1670 >> >> > URL: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 >> >> > Project: Harmony >> >> > Issue Type: Bug >> >> > Components: Classlib >> >> >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov >> >> >Priority: Trivial >> >> > Attachments: H-1670.patch >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of >> >modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas >> sTes >> >t.java >> >> > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of >> private >> >method of inner class. This is bad due to: >> >> > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; >> >> > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and >> this is >> >already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> >> - >> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >> administrators: >> >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> >> - >> >> For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >- >> >Terms of use : http://incubator.apa
RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Mikhail, >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". Here should be the following text: This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test, they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took many geek/weeks to locate. With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >testcase in ClassTest > >I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". > >2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Mikhail, >> >> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I accept >> that they are not good. >> >> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment prevent >> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for >> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to fix. >> >> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is to >> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. > >IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different >subject, >so that other people could notice that discussion and participate > >Thanks, >Mikhail > >> >> With best regards, >> Alexei Fedotov, >> Intel Middleware Products Division >> >> >-Original Message----- >> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >> >testcase in ClassTest >> > >> >Hi Alexei >> > >> >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a >> >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Mikhail >> > >> >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- >> >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] >> >> >> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: >> >> - >> >> >> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks >> >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM >> >> >> >> This is a low risk test fix. >> >> >> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > Key: HARMONY-1670 >> >> > URL: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 >> >> > Project: Harmony >> >> > Issue Type: Bug >> >> > Components: Classlib >> >> >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov >> >> >Priority: Trivial >> >> > Attachments: H-1670.patch >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of >> >modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas >> sTes >> >t.java >> >> > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of >> private >> >method of inner class. This is bad due to: >> >> > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; >> >> > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and >> this is >> >already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> >> - >> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >> administrators: >> >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> >> - >> >> For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >- >> >Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> - >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >- >Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix". 2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mikhail, I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I accept that they are not good. I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment prevent getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to fix. Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is to keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different subject, so that other people could notice that discussion and participate Thanks, Mikhail With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >testcase in ClassTest > >Hi Alexei > >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) > >Thanks, >Mikhail > >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] >> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: >> - >> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM >> >> This is a low risk test fix. >> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest >> > -- >> > >> > Key: HARMONY-1670 >> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 >> > Project: Harmony >> > Issue Type: Bug >> > Components: Classlib >> >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov >> >Priority: Trivial >> > Attachments: H-1670.patch >> > >> > >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of >modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas sTes >t.java >> > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of private >method of inner class. This is bad due to: >> > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; >> > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and this is >already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> - >> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> > >- >Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Mikhail, I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I accept that they are not good. I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment prevent getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to fix. Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is to keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment. With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid >testcase in ClassTest > >Hi Alexei > >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a >number of similar comments in other JIRAs) > >Thanks, >Mikhail > >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY- >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] >> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: >> - >> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM >> >> This is a low risk test fix. >> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest >> > -- >> > >> > Key: HARMONY-1670 >> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 >> > Project: Harmony >> > Issue Type: Bug >> > Components: Classlib >> >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov >> >Priority: Trivial >> > Attachments: H-1670.patch >> > >> > >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of >modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas sTes >t.java >> > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of private >method of inner class. This is bad due to: >> > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; >> > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and this is >already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> - >> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> > >- >Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
2006/10/11, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Alexei I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a number of similar comments in other JIRAs) Hi Mikhail, I'll be happy to clarify. Please tell me which part is not clear? Is it my English or smth else? -- Regards, Alexey Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] > > Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: > - > > [drlvm][unit] Blocks http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM > > This is a low risk test fix. > > > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest > > -- > > > > Key: HARMONY-1670 > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 > > Project: Harmony > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: Classlib > >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov > >Priority: Trivial > > Attachments: H-1670.patch > > > > > > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/ClassTest.java > > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of private method of inner class. This is bad due to: > > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; > > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and this is already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
Hi Alexei I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a number of similar comments in other JIRAs) Thanks, Mikhail 2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ] Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670: - [drlvm][unit] Blocks http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM This is a low risk test fix. > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest > -- > > Key: HARMONY-1670 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Classlib >Reporter: Alexey Varlamov >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: H-1670.patch > > > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/ClassTest.java > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of private method of inner class. This is bad due to: > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details; > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and this is already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
