Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
I have not got the precise number. I will try it.:) On 11/1/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7 secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI. What are your numbers? On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Mikhail Fursov -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Great news, Leo! 2006/11/1, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
3754ms on RI versus 5740ms on Harmony to startup Tomcat. Seems about 50% slower as well. On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not got the precise number. I will try it.:) On 11/1/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7 secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI. What are your numbers? On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Mikhail Fursov -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Thanks! AFAIK RI uses interpreter and could use OSR, while we do almost the same with a simple JIT without any advanced techniques. Not so bad :) + BEA must be slower than SUN in such tests. On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3754ms on RI versus 5740ms on Harmony to startup Tomcat. Seems about 50% slower as well. On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not got the precise number. I will try it.:) On 11/1/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7 secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI. What are your numbers? On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Mikhail Fursov -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Mikhail Fursov
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Mikhail Fursov wrote: Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) Leo was claiming 100% of Tomcat's test cases pass -- that's measurable. It's probably the best measure that we have so far for determining that an application 'works'. Well done -- everyone! Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
congratulation! I really like 100% ;-) On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Nice! Post it on the wiki? Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Yes, I have posted it on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat.:) On 11/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice! Post it on the wiki? Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Sigh...you must didn't read into it...;-) Leo The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat /Leo Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Nice! Post it on the wiki? Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Paulex Yang China Software Development Lab IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top, could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there? geir Leo Li wrote: Yes, I have posted it on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat.:) On 11/1/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice! Post it on the wiki? Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top, could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there? Front Page Application Status (in the 'Status' section) There are a number of apps listed there as people test them. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top, could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there? Front Page Application Status (in the 'Status' section) There are a number of apps listed there as people test them. Yes, and I suggest we always add links to this page when somebody creates a wiki page for application test, a few days ago, I just added several links to it(IIRC, Eclipse, Tomcat, Log4j...), because I thought they should be there but couldn't find... Regards, Tim -- Paulex Yang China Software Development Lab IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Excellent! Well done everyone! Alex. On 01/11/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Yah, that was my point. Glad to know it was already there. geir Paulex Yang wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top, could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there? Front Page Application Status (in the 'Status' section) There are a number of apps listed there as people test them. Yes, and I suggest we always add links to this page when somebody creates a wiki page for application test, a few days ago, I just added several links to it(IIRC, Eclipse, Tomcat, Log4j...), because I thought they should be there but couldn't find... Regards, Tim
Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7 secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI. What are your numbers? On 11/1/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all: Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. Note: 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval between the launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to ensure the server has been running. 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], so I have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the possible side-effect of the latter. mailing thread [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM -- Mikhail Fursov
