Re: [hlds] Name hacking?
Swapping your name slightly every few seconds so admins cannot find the person that needs banning. It normally chooses a name that is incredibly close to a currently playing player. On 10/11/06, Ghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I heard from one of my CS:S server admins that VAC banned a guy for name hacking and I was wondering what it is... ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] Name hacking?
I heard from one of my CS:S server admins that VAC banned a guy for name hacking and I was wondering what it is... ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Server Choke with 66 tick/100 tick optimization
I know! I know! Admins! :) On 10/11/06, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We all used to have horsepower grunt to run 66 & 100 tickrate servers, but this is no longer the case, SRCDS on both Windows and Linux has goobled it all up. Check the Linux SRCDS list, they are really unhappy about SRCDS performance over on that list. We used to be able to run 2 x 40 and 2 x 32 100 tickrate servers on our dual core dual CPU opteron with lots of plugins, and smooth as silk. Now we can barely manage 4 x 18 on the same hardware at 66 tickrate with minimal plugins. You could usually blame Microsoft for putting some patch in that has screwed up SRCDS performance, but when its happing on Windows 2000, Windows 2003, and various disto's of Linux on a wide variety of hardware platforms, well whats the common factor here? On 11/10/06, ShootMe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > srcds is not supporting multi-cpu so it'll run on just one "CPU" > try to turn off the HT - this splits one physical core into two virtual > and you will use then just one of them . > > > Peter N wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > I have a CS:Source server on a Dell Precision 650 dual 2.4ghz zeon w/ 2 > gig of ram and raid 0 U320 15k scsi drives (W2k3 with Windows Firewall > On). I believe i have plenty of horsepower to run a 20 player server, my > FPS is 512 usually w/ no players in the server. It's dedicated to running > GunGame w/ custom gg_ maps. Processor rarely goes past 30% utilization and > i have srcds running at "above normal". Processor affinity is set to both > procs plus both hyperthreading virtual procs Shows a total of 4 procs > because HT is on). I have done some speed tests and found that my servers > download speed is 9500Kbps and upload is 5500 Kbps. > > > > In my mind the settings below are optimal and very conservative > considering i'm only running one srcds server on this box. I continually > get Choke, lots and lots of choke. I can't figure out why this is > happening. I'm thinking it might be the maps because some maps have more > choke than others. I've read many many guides (all of which preached > different philosophies...very confusing sometimes) and have tried > everything. I wish Valve had a guide on the site that covered higher > tickrate optimization like 66 or 100 tick. Any thoughts on this issue would > be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > My server.cfg settings are: 128.135.94.192:27015 > > > > //Server Name > > hostname "Multideath GunGame Server Knife-Pro" > > > > // Advanced RCON > > sv_rcon_banpenalty 20 > > sv_rcon_maxfailures 10 > > sv_rcon_minfailures 5 > > sv_rcon_minfailuretime 30 > > > > //Log internal to cs > > log off > > sv_logbans 0 > > sv_logecho 0 > > sv_logfile 0 > > sv_log_onefile 0 > > mp_logmessages 0 > > mp_logdetail 0 > > > > //Lag Compensation > > sv_unlag 1 > > sv_maxunlag .1 > > fps_max 600 > > > > //Server cvars > > mp_friendlyfire 0 > > mp_footsteps 1 > > mp_flashlight 1 > > mp_freezetime 1 > > mp_limitteams 2 > > mp_falldamage 1 > > sv_gravity 800 > > sv_maxspeed 320 > > sv_allowupload 0 > > sv_voiceenable 1 > > sv_voicecodec voice_speex > > sv_voicequality 1 > > sv_alltalk 0 > > sv_consistency 1 > > decalfrequency 60 > > sv_timeout 40 > > sv_hltv 0 > > sv_pausable 0 > > > > //Cheats > > sv_aim 0 > > sv_cheats 0 > > > > //server rates > > sv_maxrate 2 > > sv_minrate 5000 > > sv_maxupdaterate 66 > > sv_minupdaterate 20 > > sv_lan 0 > > sv_filterban 1 > > > > //Region Settings > > sv_region 0 > > > > //Exec Configs > > exec banned_user.cfg > > exec mani_server.cfg > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pete > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] "An 8 & 10 year old". You are a total loser for letting your children play a game that is rated for teens and when in public servers they can hear the worst type of people say the worst things. plus in most hl1 mods the hipp thing to do is humiliate others. what are you fucking thinking ? people like you should be talking to child protective services. I'm an adult and i'll admit i have a mouth like a dock worker but i would never subject my children to what goes on in public gaming servers.YOU ='s a horrible parent. let the flame begin!!i said what i had to and i wont respond further. ---Original Message--- From: Chris Bass Date: 11/09/06 18:45:40 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner They could get that with a nasty spray as well. Ook wrote: > The liability issue is too great. Some bozo puts child p0rn in their > banner, > and Valve finds themselves in court. I have an 8 year old and a 10 > year old > that play on my server all the time, and sometimes play on other > servers. I > don't need them joining a server and having some xxx banner in their > face. > Too many children play Half-Life, and all it took was some bozo with an > obscene logo to get Valve to take the feature away. It will never be > given > back to us. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:40 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner > > >> I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the >> banners >> weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been taken out of the >> engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. >> >> Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, >> better to >> have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. >> >> Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than having in game >> sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? >> >> Steve! >> www.timerider.co.uk >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
Whether or not kids play the game isn't the issue. Valve turned off banners because people were using inappropriate content. The inappropriate content was offensive to adults, and went far beyond what one could reasonably expect to find in a game rated M for mature. They may one day do something about sprays in game, but the usage of offensive sprays hasn't become enough of a problem for them to do anything about them. yet. - Original Message - From: "Scott Tuttle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:11 PM Subject: RE: [hlds] HL1 banner Yes but what is the esrb rating on most hl1 games? You guessed it... Rated M for mature. It is not valve's job to enforce the M rating on the game. It is the job of the retailers to not sell the game to minors and then the job of the parents to monitor what their children "consume". You can't argue that it should be taken down because an 8 year old could see a banner. You could maybe argue that a porno banner because it actually appeared to come "from" valve leads them to disable it to reduce their liability. But then could not also a spray in game appear to come "from" valve, because you see it in game? I suppose valve should have never brought hl1 and hl2 to market because an 8 year old could accidently see it, if we were to use your they don't need to joining to see that in their face argument. If people want to let their kids play mature games then they should merely make a setting that would disable the banner and sprays... Oh wait that already exits... It is called the cl_allowdownloads cvar. Wouldn't this cvar disable the banner downloads, fast downloads, and any custom content that did not come with the default game and disable sprays also? Seems like people that let their kids play mature games and are concerned about them seeing that material should use that setting and monitor their children. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Bass Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:42 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner They could get that with a nasty spray as well. Ook wrote: > The liability issue is too great. Some bozo puts child p0rn in their > banner, > and Valve finds themselves in court. I have an 8 year old and a 10 > year old > that play on my server all the time, and sometimes play on other > servers. I > don't need them joining a server and having some xxx banner in their > face. > Too many children play Half-Life, and all it took was some bozo with an > obscene logo to get Valve to take the feature away. It will never be > given > back to us. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:40 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner > > >> I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the >> banners >> weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been taken out of the >> engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. >> >> Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, >> better to >> have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. >> >> Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than having in game >> sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? >> >> Steve! >> www.timerider.co.uk >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] Re: Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs?
Thanks for the suggestions. I've been using filezilla server for my ftp. It's working great, but the only thing I'm having problems with is the fact that I can only connect to one of the IPs configured on my box. When I try to connect to the server via FTP using the other IPs, the connection automatically closes saying that the connection was lost even before it. Any ideas on how to fix this issue? I'm behind a firewall of course. Thanks in advance -- Thanks, Noi ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] HL1 banner
Yes but what is the esrb rating on most hl1 games? You guessed it... Rated M for mature. It is not valve's job to enforce the M rating on the game. It is the job of the retailers to not sell the game to minors and then the job of the parents to monitor what their children "consume". You can't argue that it should be taken down because an 8 year old could see a banner. You could maybe argue that a porno banner because it actually appeared to come "from" valve leads them to disable it to reduce their liability. But then could not also a spray in game appear to come "from" valve, because you see it in game? I suppose valve should have never brought hl1 and hl2 to market because an 8 year old could accidently see it, if we were to use your they don't need to joining to see that in their face argument. If people want to let their kids play mature games then they should merely make a setting that would disable the banner and sprays... Oh wait that already exits... It is called the cl_allowdownloads cvar. Wouldn't this cvar disable the banner downloads, fast downloads, and any custom content that did not come with the default game and disable sprays also? Seems like people that let their kids play mature games and are concerned about them seeing that material should use that setting and monitor their children. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Bass > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:42 PM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner > > They could get that with a nasty spray as well. > > Ook wrote: > > The liability issue is too great. Some bozo puts child p0rn in their > > banner, > > and Valve finds themselves in court. I have an 8 year old and a 10 > > year old > > that play on my server all the time, and sometimes play on other > > servers. I > > don't need them joining a server and having some xxx banner in their > > face. > > Too many children play Half-Life, and all it took was some > bozo with an > > obscene logo to get Valve to take the feature away. It will never be > > given > > back to us. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Steve!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:40 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner > > > > > >> I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the > >> banners > >> weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been > taken out of the > >> engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. > >> > >> Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, > >> better to > >> have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. > >> > >> Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than > having in game > >> sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? > >> > >> Steve! > >> www.timerider.co.uk > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
They could get that with a nasty spray as well. Ook wrote: The liability issue is too great. Some bozo puts child p0rn in their banner, and Valve finds themselves in court. I have an 8 year old and a 10 year old that play on my server all the time, and sometimes play on other servers. I don't need them joining a server and having some xxx banner in their face. Too many children play Half-Life, and all it took was some bozo with an obscene logo to get Valve to take the feature away. It will never be given back to us. - Original Message - From: "Steve!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:40 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the banners weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been taken out of the engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, better to have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than having in game sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? Steve! www.timerider.co.uk ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
The liability issue is too great. Some bozo puts child p0rn in their banner, and Valve finds themselves in court. I have an 8 year old and a 10 year old that play on my server all the time, and sometimes play on other servers. I don't need them joining a server and having some xxx banner in their face. Too many children play Half-Life, and all it took was some bozo with an obscene logo to get Valve to take the feature away. It will never be given back to us. - Original Message - From: "Steve!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:40 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the banners weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been taken out of the engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, better to have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than having in game sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? Steve! www.timerider.co.uk ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
I've brought this up before, Alfred even took steps to see WHY the banners weren't working. Then he remembered that they had been taken out of the engine, and I'm sure commented that they would not be coming back. Why they were taken out, I'm not sure, they were a nice feature, better to have something there than a boring loading screen during maploads. Really Valve, give us these back, they're no worse than having in game sprays etc, what harm could they possibly do? Steve! www.timerider.co.uk ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
I haven't tried it but I doubt they would bring it back, for cs servers at least. from what i gather, the reason they removed the option was because people were abusing it (using porn, obscenities, etc) and they didn't want it to appear valve/steam was affiliated with that material. it was probably the content server's banner you saw, not a fastdownload or hltv. - Original Message - From: "Ðåñ Offord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] HL1 banner -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hey, There for Hypernia Ranked Servers, with a free copy of BattleField 2, but they dont appear to be clickable. I hope they have added the banner system back in, I can change from the black box, to a link back to my website. On 09/11/06, [GS]Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ðåñ Offord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:54 PM > Subject: [hlds] HL1 banner > > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > Hi, > > > > Recently playing on a SvenCoop Server i noticed they put the "advert" > > banners back on, for some BF2 servers? > > > > I also noticed that I got the advert on my own content server which is > > annoying. So quick question, does the banner.gif work again and how are > > you > > meant to use it? > > > > Dan > > I don't think they have started letting people have adverts again?I wish > they would though cause it sucks that I'm using my bandwidth for other > people's servers to help them out and I can't even do a bit of > advertising. > > And by BF2 do you mean the game BF2 or is that a communities abbreviation? > > BeNt > http://www.gorillazsouth.com > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- .: =CATS= Gaming :. .: http://www.catsgaming.com :. .: This email contains information that maybe confidential if your not the intended recipient, please delete this email :. -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hey, There for Hypernia Ranked Servers, with a free copy of BattleField 2, but they dont appear to be clickable. I hope they have added the banner system back in, I can change from the black box, to a link back to my website. On 09/11/06, [GS]Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ðåñ Offord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:54 PM > Subject: [hlds] HL1 banner > > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > Hi, > > > > Recently playing on a SvenCoop Server i noticed they put the "advert" > > banners back on, for some BF2 servers? > > > > I also noticed that I got the advert on my own content server which is > > annoying. So quick question, does the banner.gif work again and how are > > you > > meant to use it? > > > > Dan > > I don't think they have started letting people have adverts again?I wish > they would though cause it sucks that I'm using my bandwidth for other > people's servers to help them out and I can't even do a bit of > advertising. > > And by BF2 do you mean the game BF2 or is that a communities abbreviation? > > BeNt > http://www.gorillazsouth.com > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- .: =CATS= Gaming :. .: http://www.catsgaming.com :. .: This email contains information that maybe confidential if your not the intended recipient, please delete this email :. -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] HL1 banner
- Original Message - From: "Ðåñ Offord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:54 PM Subject: [hlds] HL1 banner -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, Recently playing on a SvenCoop Server i noticed they put the "advert" banners back on, for some BF2 servers? I also noticed that I got the advert on my own content server which is annoying. So quick question, does the banner.gif work again and how are you meant to use it? Dan I don't think they have started letting people have adverts again?I wish they would though cause it sucks that I'm using my bandwidth for other people's servers to help them out and I can't even do a bit of advertising. And by BF2 do you mean the game BF2 or is that a communities abbreviation? BeNt http://www.gorillazsouth.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Server Choke with 66 tick/100 tick optimization
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We all used to have horsepower grunt to run 66 & 100 tickrate servers, but this is no longer the case, SRCDS on both Windows and Linux has goobled it all up. Check the Linux SRCDS list, they are really unhappy about SRCDS performance over on that list. We used to be able to run 2 x 40 and 2 x 32 100 tickrate servers on our dual core dual CPU opteron with lots of plugins, and smooth as silk. Now we can barely manage 4 x 18 on the same hardware at 66 tickrate with minimal plugins. You could usually blame Microsoft for putting some patch in that has screwed up SRCDS performance, but when its happing on Windows 2000, Windows 2003, and various disto's of Linux on a wide variety of hardware platforms, well whats the common factor here? On 11/10/06, ShootMe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > srcds is not supporting multi-cpu so it'll run on just one "CPU" > try to turn off the HT - this splits one physical core into two virtual > and you will use then just one of them . > > > Peter N wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > I have a CS:Source server on a Dell Precision 650 dual 2.4ghz zeon w/ 2 > gig of ram and raid 0 U320 15k scsi drives (W2k3 with Windows Firewall > On). I believe i have plenty of horsepower to run a 20 player server, my > FPS is 512 usually w/ no players in the server. It's dedicated to running > GunGame w/ custom gg_ maps. Processor rarely goes past 30% utilization and > i have srcds running at "above normal". Processor affinity is set to both > procs plus both hyperthreading virtual procs Shows a total of 4 procs > because HT is on). I have done some speed tests and found that my servers > download speed is 9500Kbps and upload is 5500 Kbps. > > > > In my mind the settings below are optimal and very conservative > considering i'm only running one srcds server on this box. I continually > get Choke, lots and lots of choke. I can't figure out why this is > happening. I'm thinking it might be the maps because some maps have more > choke than others. I've read many many guides (all of which preached > different philosophies...very confusing sometimes) and have tried > everything. I wish Valve had a guide on the site that covered higher > tickrate optimization like 66 or 100 tick. Any thoughts on this issue would > be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > My server.cfg settings are: 128.135.94.192:27015 > > > > //Server Name > > hostname "Multideath GunGame Server Knife-Pro" > > > > // Advanced RCON > > sv_rcon_banpenalty 20 > > sv_rcon_maxfailures 10 > > sv_rcon_minfailures 5 > > sv_rcon_minfailuretime 30 > > > > //Log internal to cs > > log off > > sv_logbans 0 > > sv_logecho 0 > > sv_logfile 0 > > sv_log_onefile 0 > > mp_logmessages 0 > > mp_logdetail 0 > > > > //Lag Compensation > > sv_unlag 1 > > sv_maxunlag .1 > > fps_max 600 > > > > //Server cvars > > mp_friendlyfire 0 > > mp_footsteps 1 > > mp_flashlight 1 > > mp_freezetime 1 > > mp_limitteams 2 > > mp_falldamage 1 > > sv_gravity 800 > > sv_maxspeed 320 > > sv_allowupload 0 > > sv_voiceenable 1 > > sv_voicecodec voice_speex > > sv_voicequality 1 > > sv_alltalk 0 > > sv_consistency 1 > > decalfrequency 60 > > sv_timeout 40 > > sv_hltv 0 > > sv_pausable 0 > > > > //Cheats > > sv_aim 0 > > sv_cheats 0 > > > > //server rates > > sv_maxrate 2 > > sv_minrate 5000 > > sv_maxupdaterate 66 > > sv_minupdaterate 20 > > sv_lan 0 > > sv_filterban 1 > > > > //Region Settings > > sv_region 0 > > > > //Exec Configs > > exec banned_user.cfg > > exec mani_server.cfg > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pete > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] HL1 banner
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, Recently playing on a SvenCoop Server i noticed they put the "advert" banners back on, for some BF2 servers? I also noticed that I got the advert on my own content server which is annoying. So quick question, does the banner.gif work again and how are you meant to use it? Dan -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs?
What is the best FTP server to use for multiple IPs on a single server? -- Thanks, Noi I use a filezilla server for my windows boxes.Then I use smartftp for my client.Or filezilla client depending on what computer I'm on. From my experience smartftp gets hellaciously over loaded on the server side if you have logging turned on and it starts using upto 40-60Mb of ram when its loaded.Filezilla isn't using hardly anything and its very fast. BeNt http://www.gorillazsouth.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Server Choke with 66 tick/100 tick optimization
srcds is not supporting multi-cpu so it'll run on just one "CPU" try to turn off the HT - this splits one physical core into two virtual and you will use then just one of them . Peter N wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > I have a CS:Source server on a Dell Precision 650 dual 2.4ghz zeon w/ 2 gig > of ram and raid 0 U320 15k scsi drives (W2k3 with Windows Firewall On). I > believe i have plenty of horsepower to run a 20 player server, my FPS is 512 > usually w/ no players in the server. It's dedicated to running GunGame w/ > custom gg_ maps. Processor rarely goes past 30% utilization and i have srcds > running at "above normal". Processor affinity is set to both procs plus both > hyperthreading virtual procs Shows a total of 4 procs because HT is on). I > have done some speed tests and found that my servers download speed is > 9500Kbps and upload is 5500 Kbps. > > In my mind the settings below are optimal and very conservative considering > i'm only running one srcds server on this box. I continually get Choke, lots > and lots of choke. I can't figure out why this is happening. I'm thinking > it might be the maps because some maps have more choke than others. I've > read many many guides (all of which preached different philosophies...very > confusing sometimes) and have tried everything. I wish Valve had a guide on > the site that covered higher tickrate optimization like 66 or 100 tick. Any > thoughts on this issue would be greatly appreciated. > > > My server.cfg settings are: 128.135.94.192:27015 > > //Server Name > hostname "Multideath GunGame Server Knife-Pro" > > // Advanced RCON > sv_rcon_banpenalty 20 > sv_rcon_maxfailures 10 > sv_rcon_minfailures 5 > sv_rcon_minfailuretime 30 > > //Log internal to cs > log off > sv_logbans 0 > sv_logecho 0 > sv_logfile 0 > sv_log_onefile 0 > mp_logmessages 0 > mp_logdetail 0 > > //Lag Compensation > sv_unlag 1 > sv_maxunlag .1 > fps_max 600 > > //Server cvars > mp_friendlyfire 0 > mp_footsteps 1 > mp_flashlight 1 > mp_freezetime 1 > mp_limitteams 2 > mp_falldamage 1 > sv_gravity 800 > sv_maxspeed 320 > sv_allowupload 0 > sv_voiceenable 1 > sv_voicecodec voice_speex > sv_voicequality 1 > sv_alltalk 0 > sv_consistency 1 > decalfrequency 60 > sv_timeout 40 > sv_hltv 0 > sv_pausable 0 > > //Cheats > sv_aim 0 > sv_cheats 0 > > //server rates > sv_maxrate 2 > sv_minrate 5000 > sv_maxupdaterate 66 > sv_minupdaterate 20 > sv_lan 0 > sv_filterban 1 > > //Region Settings > sv_region 0 > > //Exec Configs > exec banned_user.cfg > exec mani_server.cfg > > Thanks, > > Pete > -- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] Re: Server Choke with 66 tick/100 tick optimization
try sv_maxrate 3 On 09/11/06, Peter N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I have a CS:Source server on a Dell Precision 650 dual 2.4ghz zeon w/ 2 gig of ram and raid 0 U320 15k scsi drives (W2k3 with Windows Firewall On). I believe i have plenty of horsepower to run a 20 player server, my FPS is 512 usually w/ no players in the server. It's dedicated to running GunGame w/ custom gg_ maps. Processor rarely goes past 30% utilization and i have srcds running at "above normal". Processor affinity is set to both procs plus both hyperthreading virtual procs Shows a total of 4 procs because HT is on). I have done some speed tests and found that my servers download speed is 9500Kbps and upload is 5500 Kbps. In my mind the settings below are optimal and very conservative considering i'm only running one srcds server on this box. I continually get Choke, lots and lots of choke. I can't figure out why this is happening. I'm thinking it might be the maps because some maps have more choke than others. I've read many many guides (all of which preached different philosophies...very confusing sometimes) and have tried everything. I wish Valve had a guide on the site that covered higher tickrate optimization like 66 or 100 tick. Any thoughts on this issue would be greatly appreciated. My server.cfg settings are: 128.135.94.192:27015 //Server Name hostname "Multideath GunGame Server Knife-Pro" // Advanced RCON sv_rcon_banpenalty 20 sv_rcon_maxfailures 10 sv_rcon_minfailures 5 sv_rcon_minfailuretime 30 //Log internal to cs log off sv_logbans 0 sv_logecho 0 sv_logfile 0 sv_log_onefile 0 mp_logmessages 0 mp_logdetail 0 //Lag Compensation sv_unlag 1 sv_maxunlag .1 fps_max 600 //Server cvars mp_friendlyfire 0 mp_footsteps 1 mp_flashlight 1 mp_freezetime 1 mp_limitteams 2 mp_falldamage 1 sv_gravity 800 sv_maxspeed 320 sv_allowupload 0 sv_voiceenable 1 sv_voicecodec voice_speex sv_voicequality 1 sv_alltalk 0 sv_consistency 1 decalfrequency 60 sv_timeout 40 sv_hltv 0 sv_pausable 0 //Cheats sv_aim 0 sv_cheats 0 //server rates sv_maxrate 2 sv_minrate 5000 sv_maxupdaterate 66 sv_minupdaterate 20 sv_lan 0 sv_filterban 1 //Region Settings sv_region 0 //Exec Configs exec banned_user.cfg exec mani_server.cfg Thanks, Pete -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] Server Choke with 66 tick/100 tick optimization
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I have a CS:Source server on a Dell Precision 650 dual 2.4ghz zeon w/ 2 gig of ram and raid 0 U320 15k scsi drives (W2k3 with Windows Firewall On). I believe i have plenty of horsepower to run a 20 player server, my FPS is 512 usually w/ no players in the server. It's dedicated to running GunGame w/ custom gg_ maps. Processor rarely goes past 30% utilization and i have srcds running at "above normal". Processor affinity is set to both procs plus both hyperthreading virtual procs Shows a total of 4 procs because HT is on). I have done some speed tests and found that my servers download speed is 9500Kbps and upload is 5500 Kbps. In my mind the settings below are optimal and very conservative considering i'm only running one srcds server on this box. I continually get Choke, lots and lots of choke. I can't figure out why this is happening. I'm thinking it might be the maps because some maps have more choke than others. I've read many many guides (all of which preached different philosophies...very confusing sometimes) and have tried everything. I wish Valve had a guide on the site that covered higher tickrate optimization like 66 or 100 tick. Any thoughts on this issue would be greatly appreciated. My server.cfg settings are: 128.135.94.192:27015 //Server Name hostname "Multideath GunGame Server Knife-Pro" // Advanced RCON sv_rcon_banpenalty 20 sv_rcon_maxfailures 10 sv_rcon_minfailures 5 sv_rcon_minfailuretime 30 //Log internal to cs log off sv_logbans 0 sv_logecho 0 sv_logfile 0 sv_log_onefile 0 mp_logmessages 0 mp_logdetail 0 //Lag Compensation sv_unlag 1 sv_maxunlag .1 fps_max 600 //Server cvars mp_friendlyfire 0 mp_footsteps 1 mp_flashlight 1 mp_freezetime 1 mp_limitteams 2 mp_falldamage 1 sv_gravity 800 sv_maxspeed 320 sv_allowupload 0 sv_voiceenable 1 sv_voicecodec voice_speex sv_voicequality 1 sv_alltalk 0 sv_consistency 1 decalfrequency 60 sv_timeout 40 sv_hltv 0 sv_pausable 0 //Cheats sv_aim 0 sv_cheats 0 //server rates sv_maxrate 2 sv_minrate 5000 sv_maxupdaterate 66 sv_minupdaterate 20 sv_lan 0 sv_filterban 1 //Region Settings sv_region 0 //Exec Configs exec banned_user.cfg exec mani_server.cfg Thanks, Pete -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike
Sorry Scott that was a typo on my part Roger Stumbaugh Cumberland Computer & Network Services 606a North Centre Street Cumberland, MD 21502 301-777-1874 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Tuttle Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:22 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike He said 16000 not 1600 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > Stumbaugh > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:42 PM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: RE: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike > > > I just don't like it when you can't buy all the ct weapons > when you're a ct. > I'm not real good at the game, but still like to have a > chance. I may have > gotten it, but not sure cause I only play against bots. I changed the > mp_startmoney to 1600 but didn't see a difference, then I > turned off the > dynamic weapons crap and it may be okay now, just have to > play against real > players to see for sure > > > Roger Stumbaugh > Cumberland Computer & Network Services > 606a North Centre Street > Cumberland, MD 21502 > 301-777-1874 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Williams > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:27 PM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike > > depends coz if he wants to keep the classic game play but in > turn wants > to allow the ct to buy t weapons ans visa verca (Kinda like deathmatch > without the constant respawning) or not. > > Biscuits wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > mp_startmoney 16000 > > > > On 11/9/06, Roger Stumbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> How can I change my Counter-Strike Source server so that > players can > >> purchase any weapons any time they want. Let me rephrase > that, how can I > >> make it so when the round starts and they are in the buy > zone they are > >> able > >> to purchase any weapon they want, until the buy time > expires(no need to > >> change that). > >> > >> Thanks Rodge > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Biscuits > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike
He said 16000 not 1600 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > Stumbaugh > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:42 PM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: RE: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike > > > I just don't like it when you can't buy all the ct weapons > when you're a ct. > I'm not real good at the game, but still like to have a > chance. I may have > gotten it, but not sure cause I only play against bots. I changed the > mp_startmoney to 1600 but didn't see a difference, then I > turned off the > dynamic weapons crap and it may be okay now, just have to > play against real > players to see for sure > > > Roger Stumbaugh > Cumberland Computer & Network Services > 606a North Centre Street > Cumberland, MD 21502 > 301-777-1874 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Williams > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:27 PM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds] Hlds-cstrike > > depends coz if he wants to keep the classic game play but in > turn wants > to allow the ct to buy t weapons ans visa verca (Kinda like deathmatch > without the constant respawning) or not. > > Biscuits wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > mp_startmoney 16000 > > > > On 11/9/06, Roger Stumbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> How can I change my Counter-Strike Source server so that > players can > >> purchase any weapons any time they want. Let me rephrase > that, how can I > >> make it so when the round starts and they are in the buy > zone they are > >> able > >> to purchase any weapon they want, until the buy time > expires(no need to > >> change that). > >> > >> Thanks Rodge > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Biscuits > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs?
I use serv-u which works fine on servers with multiple ips, only thing is the process needs restarting after adding / removing ips from the box. The main benefit for us is that it can store user settings in the registry making automation systems for setting up / removing ftp accounts easy. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:41 AM Subject: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] What is the best FTP server to use for multiple IPs on a single server? -- Thanks, Noi -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs?
For Windows there is a good one from Filezilla http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/ and for Linux i prefer Proftpd. As Client FileZilla is also a good Solution (Client and Server is not in one Bundle - it's seperate). Regards, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > What is the best FTP server to use for multiple IPs on a single server? > > -- > > Thanks, > > Noi > > -- > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I use proFTP http://www.proftpd.org/goals.html for winblows servers. but i prefere pureFTP http://www.pureftpd.org/project/pure-ftpd for every other OS. as far as clients go cuteFTP is the only way to go. ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 11/08/06 23:46:39 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds] Best FTP Server for Multiple IPs? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] What is the best FTP server to use for multiple IPs on a single server? -- Thanks, Noi -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds . -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
