Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod

2008-01-22 Thread deacon.DGX 

So true... sorry for that.

AMX ModX is pretty standard.  http://www.amxmodx.org/compiler.php

Once you're on that page you can select TFC from the drop down.

-Deac

Roman Hatsiev wrote:

You are missing essential part of the question, guys. TFC is HL1-based mod.






___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Christopher M. Bass 
I'm believing it's an issue related to something the clients have set OR
some network hiccup between them and server.

Chris Bass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 16:34
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Chris,

No only a handful are complaining of choke.

And are you guys saying change the server max_rate to 5000?

Or tell the client to?

And I found an issue. Every Since Valve released this new cvar.

> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10

For some reason i have though this was related to all rate settings.

I have been telling people it doesn't matter what you have your rates
set
for because the server would temporarily adjust them to meet minimum
server side settings.

I think i may have been wrong here. That cvar only affects cmdrate..
Right?

the client CAN adjust there rate and update_rate independent to what the
server has set. Being they are within the minimum/maximum.

Is this correct?



---
>
Tell them to set their rates properly, depending on which game the
default rate is 1-25000 and at 66 tick that isnt always enough,
anyone that complains about that I tell them to put rate 5 and that
usually smooths it out, you can do this for people using cvars.



Christopher M. Bass wrote:
> Is everyone complaining of choke on one server or is it few people on
> all servers? If it's a few people across all servers, I'm likely to
> blame something client side or network related. Generally when the
> server is choking, EVERYONE sees it.
>
> Chris Bass
>
>--
> Yes I am running, scrdsfpsbooster as a service.  The main thing I get
is
> some players complaining of choke. No Lag really just Choke.
>
> Any suggestions there?
>
>
>

> -
> Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
> have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of
players
> per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.
>
> As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
> or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
> the network load.
>
> As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
> download it here:
> http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
> service so it runs when server starts up.
>
> Chris Bass
---
>
> Strange you should say that.
>
> With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
> 100mb Network connection.
>
> As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
> above
> load?
>
> What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
> learn.
>
> And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever
instances.
>
> I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for
32
> players?
>
> Thanks again all.
>
>

> ---
> If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
> handle
> 2 more servers loaded on it.
>
> Jason
>
-
>
> Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
> offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
> machine?
> If
> you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
> stable.
>
> I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist,
but
> I
> shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them.
Beside
> that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!
>
---
>
> Hey all,
>
> Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.
>
> I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.
>
> Stats:
> 2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
> 8Gigs 533DDR2
> Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
> 250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
> 100Gig Ethernet
> Good DataCenter.
>
> I wan to run
> 1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
> 1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
> 2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
> 2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.
>
> So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
> the
> Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.
>
> I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to
stay
> at
> 66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
> Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
> server
> is
> running sourceboost.
>
> // bandwidth rates/settings
> sv_minrate 1
> sv_maxrate 3
> sv_mincmdrate 30
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 30
> sv_maxupdaterate 86
> sv_client_predict 1
> sv_client_interpolate 1
> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
> decalfrequency 10
> fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command

Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod

2008-01-22 Thread Johnathan Davis 
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Foxbot:
http://foxbot.planetfortress.gamespy.com/?go=downloads

AMX Mod X is very easy to configure and probably has the most advanced
programming behind it (I'd say it's also the most supported).  It comes with
plugins for basic admin functions, but you can also get a whole lot of other
ones too.  Here are some plugins for AMX Mod X that are strictly for TFC:
http://www.amxmodx.org/compiler.php?mod=5&cat=0&plugin=&author=&go=search

On Jan 22, 2008 9:27 AM, Roman Hatsiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You are missing essential part of the question, guys. TFC is HL1-based
> mod.
>
> On 1/22/08, Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
> > Osa!
> > Agreed, BAT is nice and simple with little overhead.  I do have
> customers
> > that
> > run sourcemod on TF2 and that works well for them.
> > I would suggest trying BAT first and then upgrading if you need addition
> > functionality.
> > -GGCF
> >
> > - Original Message 
> > From: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> > To: "hlds@list.valvesoftware.com" 
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod
> > Date: 22/01/08 11:44
> > We use BAT on lesser source mods .. i.e. Dystopia
> > Mike Stiehm wrote:
> > > --
> > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > >
> > > I'm setting up a TFC server ran one about 6 years ago now.
> > > I'm a TF2 server admin and know just about all the tips and
> > > tricks for SRCDS. I'm looking for a good admin type mod for
> > > TFC. So any TFC server admins out their what do you guys
> > > run?
> > > --
> > >
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[1]
> > >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please
> > visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[2]
> >
> > 
> > Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.10
> >
> > ===References:===
> >   1. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >   2. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Greg Williams 
Chris,

No only a handful are complaining of choke.

And are you guys saying change the server max_rate to 5000?

Or tell the client to?

And I found an issue. Every Since Valve released this new cvar.

> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10

For some reason i have though this was related to all rate settings.

I have been telling people it doesn't matter what you have your rates set
for because the server would temporarily adjust them to meet minimum
server side settings.

I think i may have been wrong here. That cvar only affects cmdrate..
Right?

the client CAN adjust there rate and update_rate independent to what the
server has set. Being they are within the minimum/maximum.

Is this correct?



---
>
Tell them to set their rates properly, depending on which game the
default rate is 1-25000 and at 66 tick that isnt always enough,
anyone that complains about that I tell them to put rate 5 and that
usually smooths it out, you can do this for people using cvars.



Christopher M. Bass wrote:
> Is everyone complaining of choke on one server or is it few people on
> all servers? If it's a few people across all servers, I'm likely to
> blame something client side or network related. Generally when the
> server is choking, EVERYONE sees it.
>
> Chris Bass
>
>--
> Yes I am running, scrdsfpsbooster as a service.  The main thing I get is
> some players complaining of choke. No Lag really just Choke.
>
> Any suggestions there?
>
>
> 
> -
> Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
> have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of players
> per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.
>
> As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
> or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
> the network load.
>
> As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
> download it here:
> http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
> service so it runs when server starts up.
>
> Chris Bass
---
>
> Strange you should say that.
>
> With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
> 100mb Network connection.
>
> As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
> above
> load?
>
> What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
> learn.
>
> And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.
>
> I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
> players?
>
> Thanks again all.
>
> 
> ---
> If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
> handle
> 2 more servers loaded on it.
>
> Jason
>
-
>
> Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
> offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
> machine?
> If
> you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
> stable.
>
> I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but
> I
> shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
> that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!
>
---
>
> Hey all,
>
> Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.
>
> I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.
>
> Stats:
> 2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
> 8Gigs 533DDR2
> Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
> 250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
> 100Gig Ethernet
> Good DataCenter.
>
> I wan to run
> 1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
> 1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
> 2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
> 2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.
>
> So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
> the
> Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.
>
> I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay
> at
> 66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
> Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
> server
> is
> running sourceboost.
>
> // bandwidth rates/settings
> sv_minrate 1
> sv_maxrate 3
> sv_mincmdrate 30
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 30
> sv_maxupdaterate 86
> sv_client_predict 1
> sv_client_interpolate 1
> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
> decalfrequency 10
> fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to
> 600..
> Was testing the 300 setting.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Here is my current setup.
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
>





_

Re: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread [??R] The-/ 

Christopher M. Bass wrote:

Is everyone complaining of choke on one server or is it few people on
all servers? If it's a few people across all servers, I'm likely to
blame something client side or network related. Generally when the
server is choking, EVERYONE sees it.

Chris Bass

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:52
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Yes I am running, scrdsfpsbooster as a service.  The main thing I get is
some players complaining of choke. No Lag really just Choke.

Any suggestions there?



-
Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of players
per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.

As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
the network load.

As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
download it here:
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
service so it runs when server starts up.

Chris Bass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:47
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Strange you should say that.

With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
100mb Network connection.

As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
above
load?

What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
learn.

And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.

I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
players?

Thanks again all.


---
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
machine?
If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but
I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay
at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
server
is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to
600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



Tell them to set their rates properly, depending on which game the
default rate is 1-25000 and at 66 tick that isnt always enough,
anyone that complains about that I tell them to put rate 5 and that
usually smooths it out, you can do this

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Christopher M. Bass 
Is everyone complaining of choke on one server or is it few people on
all servers? If it's a few people across all servers, I'm likely to
blame something client side or network related. Generally when the
server is choking, EVERYONE sees it.

Chris Bass

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:52
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Yes I am running, scrdsfpsbooster as a service.  The main thing I get is
some players complaining of choke. No Lag really just Choke.

Any suggestions there?



-
Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of players
per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.

As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
the network load.

As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
download it here:
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
service so it runs when server starts up.

Chris Bass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:47
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Strange you should say that.

With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
100mb Network connection.

As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
above
load?

What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
learn.

And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.

I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
players?

Thanks again all.


---
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
machine?
If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but
I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay
at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
server
is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to
600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Jason O. Washburn 
WOW!  Welcome back the list has been boring without you.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: "kdog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: 1/22/2008 4:22 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Source is an abomination.  Stick with hl1mods.
How ya been Jason O.  >>> K .  This list is now fun again.

---Original Message---

From: Jason O. Washburn
Date: 01/22/08 01:16:01
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine? If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


__ NOD32 2811 (20080121) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
--


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Greg Williams 
Yes I am running, scrdsfpsbooster as a service.  The main thing I get is
some players complaining of choke. No Lag really just Choke.

Any suggestions there?


-
Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of players
per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.

As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
the network load.

As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
download it here:
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
service so it runs when server starts up.

Chris Bass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:47
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Strange you should say that.

With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
100mb Network connection.

As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
above
load?

What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
learn.

And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.

I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
players?

Thanks again all.


---
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
machine?
If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but
I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay
at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
server
is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to
600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Tim Renshaw 
> Hey all,
>
> Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.
>
> I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.
>
> Stats:
> 2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
> 8Gigs 533DDR2
> Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
> 250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
> 100Gig Ethernet
> Good DataCenter.
>
> I wan to run
> 1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
> 1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
> 2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
> 2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.
>
> So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
> Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.
>
> I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
> 66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
> Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server
> is running sourceboost.
>
> // bandwidth rates/settings
> sv_minrate 1
> sv_maxrate 3
> sv_mincmdrate 30
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 30
> sv_maxupdaterate 86
> sv_client_predict 1
> sv_client_interpolate 1
> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
> decalfrequency 10
> fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
> Was testing the 300 setting.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
you say 100mbit but how much bandwidth can you chew up a month, your
want list looks like about 2.5 - 3 TB a month to me & your disk I0
looks rather heavy would look maybe look at addtional drives if you
want to keep this setup.

As others have said I would  look at getting another box rather
putting all your eggs in one basket 1 x server per core is nice having
said that we have 24 man CSS & 18 man tf2 war server with sourceTV on
one core without issue & a 28 slot tf2 eating another core all at 66
tick..

We found little difference on cpu load running 300(250) vs 600
fps(512)  pings were slightly improved, so we run them at 600fps.
Players without looking at netgraph couldn't tell the difference
between 66 & 100 tick(apart from funky door issues with 100 tick) load
seemed a bit higher with 100 tick so we run at 66 tick :)

we run...

sv_minrate 15000///
sv_maxrate 3///
sv_mincmdrate 66//
sv_maxcmdrate 100//
sv_minupdaterate 66///
sv_maxupdaterate 100///
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_min_interp_ratio 1//
sv_client_max_interp_ratio 1//
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10/
sv_unlag 1/
sv_unlag_fixstuck 1
sv_maxunlag .2/


I hope this helps..

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] [Tf2] Map doesnt switch

2008-01-22 Thread LDuke 
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
The server creates the tf_gamerules entity, but the map must send input that
defines the behavior required for the map.

All of the Valve maps send the input necessary for that map. This map
apparently does not.  Therefore, the bug is with the map.



On Jan 22, 2008 12:15 AM, Ronny Schedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> So in other words, it is a server bug and needs to be fixed. The server
> make
> the rules, not the map.
>
>
> > its a map problme, if the map doesnt set OnMapSpawn"
> > "tf_gamerules,SetStalemateOnTimelimit,1,0,-1".. the map wont change at
> > hte timelimit. it will only change at the end of the round
> >
> > On Jan 21, 2008 5:09 PM, Ronny Schedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> When the time limit is set, the server must change the map after the
> >> limit
> >> is reached. This is not map related, this is a server setting.
> >>
> >> We have disabled the stalemate round in the server settings, this is
> not
> >> working, but this is another problem.
> >>
> >>
> >> > some of the map makers didnt put "OnMapSpawn"
> >> > "tf_gamerules,SetStalemateOnTimelimit,1,0,-1". so the map will never
> >> > change til you do it manualy or rtv
> >> >
> >> > On Jan 21, 2008 9:54 AM, Saint K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> I don't agree with that statement. Ctf_2fort for example doesn't
> >> >> respect
> >> >> map
> >> >> time limits. It go's waaay over limit before it decides to throw
> >> >> up
> >> >> suddendeath mode to close off the map.
> >> >>
> >> >> Saint K.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> >> >> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Graham M
> >> >> Verzonden: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:27 PM
> >> >> Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> >> >> Onderwerp: Re: [hlds] [Tf2] Map doesnt switch
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If everything else and all other maps are working fine then it must
> be
> >> >> a
> >> >> bug in the map.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Eric van Beesten wrote:
> >> >> > Hee guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I just uploaded the map cp_toy_fort_beta2 to our server. But the
> map
> >> >> doesn't
> >> >> > change if we set this map on. So, if there is no admin we could
> play
> >> >> > this
> >> >> > map the whole day without any change. Did I set something wring in
> >> >> > my
> >> >> > server.cfg? or is it just a bug in the map?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If have set this in server.cfg:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > mp_timelimit 25
> >> >> > mp_maxrounds 2
> >> >> >
> >> >> > so basicly the server needs to change after 25 minutes and 2
> rounds!
> >> >> > But
> >> >> it
> >> >> > doesn't!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > anyone have the same problem?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ___
> >> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >> >> > archives,
> >> >> please visit:
> >> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ___
> >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> >> >> please visit:
> >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1234 - Release Date:
> >> >> 1/20/2008
> >> >> 2:15 PM
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ___
> >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> >> >> please visit:
> >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> >> > please visit:
> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod

2008-01-22 Thread Roman Hatsiev 
You are missing essential part of the question, guys. TFC is HL1-based mod.

On 1/22/08, Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
> Osa!
> Agreed, BAT is nice and simple with little overhead.  I do have customers
> that
> run sourcemod on TF2 and that works well for them.
> I would suggest trying BAT first and then upgrading if you need addition
> functionality.
> -GGCF
>
> - Original Message 
> From: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> To: "hlds@list.valvesoftware.com" 
> Subject: Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod
> Date: 22/01/08 11:44
> We use BAT on lesser source mods .. i.e. Dystopia
> Mike Stiehm wrote:
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> >
> > I'm setting up a TFC server ran one about 6 years ago now.
> > I'm a TF2 server admin and know just about all the tips and
> > tricks for SRCDS. I'm looking for a good admin type mod for
> > TFC. So any TFC server admins out their what do you guys
> > run?
> > --
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[1]
> >
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[2]
>
> 
> Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.10
>
> ===References:===
>   1. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>   2. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod

2008-01-22 Thread Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme 
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Osa!
Agreed, BAT is nice and simple with little overhead.  I do have customers that
run sourcemod on TF2 and that works well for them.
I would suggest trying BAT first and then upgrading if you need addition 
functionality.
-GGCF

- Original Message 
From: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To: "hlds@list.valvesoftware.com" 
Subject: Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod
Date: 22/01/08 11:44
We use BAT on lesser source mods .. i.e. Dystopia
Mike Stiehm wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>
> I'm setting up a TFC server ran one about 6 years ago now.
> I'm a TF2 server admin and know just about all the tips and
> tricks for SRCDS. I'm looking for a good admin type mod for
> TFC. So any TFC server admins out their what do you guys
> run?
> --
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[1]
>
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds[2]


Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.10

===References:===
  1. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
  2. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] HLDS (Ya it's old) Good admin mod

2008-01-22 Thread Rob Poe 

We use BAT on lesser source mods .. i.e. Dystopia



Mike Stiehm wrote:

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

I'm setting up a TFC server ran one about 6 years ago now.
I'm a TF2 server admin and know just about all the tips and
tricks for SRCDS. I'm looking for a good admin type mod for
TFC. So any TFC server admins out their what do you guys
run?
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Christopher M. Bass 
Go ahead and put more servers on there. It shouldn't be a problem. I
have found there isn't some set in stone formula for X amount of players
per y server. It all depends on mods, tickrate, FPS among others.

As for network, my guess based on hardware is your at either Softlayer
or ThePlanet. Both of them have fine networks and it can easily handle
the network load.

As Roman said earlier, make sure your running scrdsfpsbooster. You can
download it here:
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/downloads/srcdsfpsboost.zip Set it as a
service so it runs when server starts up.

Chris Bass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:47
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Strange you should say that.

With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
100mb Network connection.

As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the
above
load?

What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to
learn.

And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.

I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
players?

Thanks again all.


---
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one
machine?
If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but
I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of
the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay
at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The
server
is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to
600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Roman Hatsiev 
It is not clear from your description whether you run FPS booster or
not. If not then you should try it first to see if it will improve
your gaming experience.

Speaking of resources your new box should be fine running all those
servers even with full load - dual Xeon 5310 is quite a workhorse. I
had similar box running several public CS:S 100 ticks servers with FPS
booster quite some time ago, it was doing just great under 100-110
players while all games you mentioned are less demanding than boosted
100 tics CS:S.

Regards,

Roman

On Jan 22, 2008 6:46 PM, Greg Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange you should say that.
>
> With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
> 100mb Network connection.
>
> As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the above
> load?
>
> What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to learn.
>
> And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.
>
> I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
> players?
>
> Thanks again all.
>
> ---
>
> If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
> handle
> 2 more servers loaded on it.
>
> Jason
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions
>
>
> Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
> offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine?
> If
> you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
> stable.
>
> I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
> shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
> that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
> Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
> Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions
>
> Hey all,
>
> Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.
>
> I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.
>
> Stats:
> 2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
> 8Gigs 533DDR2
> Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
> 250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
> 100Gig Ethernet
> Good DataCenter.
>
> I wan to run
> 1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
> 1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
> 2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
> 2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.
>
> So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
> Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.
>
> I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
> 66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
> Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server
> is
> running sourceboost.
>
> // bandwidth rates/settings
> sv_minrate 1
> sv_maxrate 3
> sv_mincmdrate 30
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 30
> sv_maxupdaterate 86
> sv_client_predict 1
> sv_client_interpolate 1
> sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
> decalfrequency 10
> fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
> Was testing the 300 setting.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Here is my current setup.
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Greg Williams 
Strange you should say that.

With 32 players on DOD and 24 on COD last night I was using 3% of the
100mb Network connection.

As for stability. I am no where touching the CPU or memory with the above
load?

What do you base your remarks on? I am not bashing, I am trying to learn.

And so far the data from the box fully substantiates 6 sever instances.

I am looking for Rate Settings. DTMS, did they recommend 33 tick for 32
players?

Thanks again all.

---
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could
handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine?
If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers
stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server
is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread kdog 
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Source is an abomination.  Stick with hl1mods.
How ya been Jason O.  >>> K .  This list is now fun again.

---Original Message---

From: Jason O. Washburn
Date: 01/22/08 01:16:01
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine? If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


__ NOD32 2811 (20080121) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
--


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Jason O. Washburn 
If what he's saying is correct it does appear that the machine could handle
2 more servers loaded on it.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric van Beesten
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions


Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine? If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server is
running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


__ NOD32 2811 (20080121) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

2008-01-22 Thread Eric van Beesten 
Good luck with running 6 servers on 1 machine. Hope you enjoy lagg. No
offence, but why do you want to run that much gameservers on one machine? If
you have a decent community buy another server to run those servers stable.

I don't know if you are starting a new community or that one exist, but I
shall rather focus on 2 gameserver on one machine then 6 of them. Beside
that, your creating a hell of datatrafic!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Williams
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2008 6:12
Aan: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Onderwerp: [hlds] Looking for suggestions

Hey all,

Looking for some suggestions here. Maybe it can help everyone.

I just got a new dedicate server for our community to use.

Stats:
2 Quad Core Intel Xeons 1.6GHZ
8Gigs 533DDR2
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
250 Gig Raid0 (I think)
100Gig Ethernet
Good DataCenter.

I wan to run
1 - DOD:s 32 Slot.
1- DOD:s 24 Slot.
2 - TF2 - 24 Slot
2 Cod4 - 24 Slot.

So far I have the 2 Cod4, and 2 DOD:s on the box, and am using 2GB of the
Ram, and 10% Cpu with 50 player total across the COD & DOD servers.

I am looking for the optimum setting for the DOD Server. I want to stay at
66 tick. I have no interest in 100. Lots of players experience choke.
Especially on the 32 slot server when we get above 20 players. The server
is running sourceboost.

// bandwidth rates/settings
sv_minrate 1
sv_maxrate 3
sv_mincmdrate 30
sv_maxcmdrate 66
sv_minupdaterate 30
sv_maxupdaterate 86
sv_client_predict 1
sv_client_interpolate 1
sv_client_cmdrate_difference 10
decalfrequency 10
fps_max 300  ---> I have this in because the command line is set to 600..
Was testing the 300 setting.

Any help would be appreciated.

Here is my current setup.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


__ NOD32 2811 (20080121) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds