Re: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:32:08 +1000, Matthew Hartwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >How many detections does it take for someone to be globally banned? I'm not 100% certain, but I think right now just one. I think the secure-global bans only last 24 hours right now. Once we get more comfortable with the way the system is working, both of these variables will probably change. Other than that, I don't really know the specifics. Any change in the way the ban system works will probably be announced by Erik or Eric, who are out this week and have left me on module PR duty. :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -Wednesday
I'm another one that's been on the list a long time and hasn't been following it for a while, too. I still run my cstrike server and update it a little later than everyone else... :) Will 27011 have to be open for inbound connections, or just be able to receive replies on server initiated outbound connections? Thanks... -Chris aka ZenCow Erik Johnson wrote > If you block port 27011, you won't globally ban people right now. In the > future, you'll be required to open that port. > > Erik > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik wrote a nice explanation on this topic about 2 weeks ago so check the archives for the details. In short, HLDM/TFC require a client release to implement VAC, and client releases take time to do (lots of testing needs to be done, and people hate upgrading every 2 months). HalfLife wrote: | Hi Leon, | | Aii Why is it always CS and DOD the VAC is for - I'm waiting for the VAC to be used on HLDM serveres. | | Is there any release date for HLDM serveres to use VAC in the future or is it only for CS and DOD??? | | Regards | Frank | | - Original Message - | From: "Leon Hartwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 AM | Subject: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28 | | | |>We've updated the BETA security modules again (see #4 below to set your |>server up to use these). Changes for these modules include: |> |>- Detection of OGC 10.1b, Joolz, and GoldFinger. |>- Fixed secure-global bans not taking effect sometimes. |>- Fixed secure-global banned players being allowed to connect to secure |>servers sometimes. |> |>1) This beta test is only for Counter-Strike servers...not Day of Defeat. |> |>2) Anyone detected cheating during this beta test *may* get banned for it, |>but only for the duration of the beta test. This means if you test a cheat |>on your server while running the beta modules, you might find yourself |>banned from your own server. At the end of the beta test, we'll clear the |>bans that were collected before releasing the modules publicly. |> |>3) We're no longer using port 27013 for the ban list. You will now see |>traffic (in/out) on port 27011. This traffic is to/from the ban list |>server. Make sure you have this port open in your firewall. |> |>4) The password for the beta modules is "vactest", so make sure you have... |> |>-testmodule vactest |> |>...in your command line and restart your server. |> |>Let me know if you have any problems with these modules and we'll look into |>them right away. Thanks for helping out. |> |>-Leon |>___ |>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: |>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux |> | | | ___ | To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: | http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9bbD7tQexIcEKo44RArhlAKCC+pcuyuxHYVwpDmKofU6EY71mwACfWQzS y1QaM8eFPY0D3ceQiKL/je8= =bYoq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
Hi Leon, Aii Why is it always CS and DOD the VAC is for - I'm waiting for the VAC to be used on HLDM serveres. Is there any release date for HLDM serveres to use VAC in the future or is it only for CS and DOD??? Regards Frank - Original Message - From: "Leon Hartwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28 > We've updated the BETA security modules again (see #4 below to set your > server up to use these). Changes for these modules include: > > - Detection of OGC 10.1b, Joolz, and GoldFinger. > - Fixed secure-global bans not taking effect sometimes. > - Fixed secure-global banned players being allowed to connect to secure > servers sometimes. > > 1) This beta test is only for Counter-Strike servers...not Day of Defeat. > > 2) Anyone detected cheating during this beta test *may* get banned for it, > but only for the duration of the beta test. This means if you test a cheat > on your server while running the beta modules, you might find yourself > banned from your own server. At the end of the beta test, we'll clear the > bans that were collected before releasing the modules publicly. > > 3) We're no longer using port 27013 for the ban list. You will now see > traffic (in/out) on port 27011. This traffic is to/from the ban list > server. Make sure you have this port open in your firewall. > > 4) The password for the beta modules is "vactest", so make sure you have... > > -testmodule vactest > > ...in your command line and restart your server. > > Let me know if you have any problems with these modules and we'll look into > them right away. Thanks for helping out. > > -Leon > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:04:52 +, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > Cant see how it can be used to cheat more than say, external voice com > systems... even the telephone :) > Run an irc bot and have it relay both teams chat? Telephones dont pick up team chat ;) Most hopefully use external voice, or ingame atleast, but some people still type away.. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ...
As has been said before, don't use mode 3 unless you want to break something :) Its experimental, you will be lucky if it works. Mode 1 and 2 are rock solid though, use them where ever you want :) Bill B wrote: > Hi Adam, > Pingboost 3 was pretty unusable for me, it caused lag from hell at times. > And this was on a 1.1 ghz server with up to 8 players! > I use pingboost 2 and it helped lower peoples pings by 10 to 20 with no > noticable lag increase and cpu was about the same as well. > > -Bill > - Original Message - > From: "Adam Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:32 PM > Subject: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ... > > > >>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand >>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. >>-- >>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] >>Hi all, I run a 20 ppl CS server on a XP 2000+ with 512 MB of memory on a >>stripped down Linux 2.4.18. This is the only process running. It is >>connected to a 10Mbit half duplex connection to the Net. I am wondering > > due > >>to the fact that pingboost 3 processing a frame EVERY time a packet > > arrives > >>and can cause extreme CPU usage, should some players experience "warping" > > or > >>sliding effect when they are all in and around 30 - 50ms with a server >>average across all players of approx. 45 ms? Basically, has anyone else >>noticed that when running pingboost 3 that some (1 or 2) ppl are >>experiencing lag-like effect? >>___ >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Alfred Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem.
Cant see how it can be used to cheat more than say, external voice com systems... even the telephone :) On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 16:00, alfred wrote: > yes. You can use it as a "covert" channel to tell your teammates where > others are :) Not that its the only way, but its a way never the less. > > > craig kaiser wrote: > > Okay can IRC be used to play unfairly? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem.
yes. You can use it as a "covert" channel to tell your teammates where others are :) Not that its the only way, but its a way never the less. craig kaiser wrote: > Okay can IRC be used to play unfairly? > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PiTaGoRaS > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. > > Err, hlirc isn't a client hook, or at least is what his autor has said. > > - Original Message - > From: "MoD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:35 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. > > > >>HLirc is a client.dll hook, just like OGC. >> >>True, all it does is give you IRC, but valve don't allow it. >> >>Tell your friends to stfu... fact is valve didnt ban you, right? >> >> MoD, >> >>Always @ your service. >> >>- Original Message - >>From: "Paul Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:14 PM >>Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. >> >> >> >>>Can you help please? >>> >>>I joined my usual server (80.71.2.84:27016 [5SI]Public Smoking Shed) a >> > few > >>>days ago and was kicked to console with the follwing message: >>> >>>* >>>You have been automatically disconnected from this secure server because >> >>an >> >>>illegal cheat was detected on your computer. Repeat violaters may be >>>permanently banned from all secure servers. >>>* >>>screenshot: http://reidme.info/misc/vac_screeny.jpg >>> >>>It was a fresh install of CS that morning as I had installed the Merc >> > pack > >>>the night before and found the player models too confusing and I'd lost >> >>the >> >>>function of the variable crosshair to show aiming stability. >>>I re-installed HL + CS, and backed up the sounds/sprites/models dirs and >>>installed the Mercenary Pack v2.5 for Counter-Strike >>>(http://clanfmc.xrs.net/). I replaced the models folder with the backup >> >>but >> >>>kept the sprite and sound changes. >>>I also downloaded HLirc (http://www.cscentral.com/hlirc/), which is an >> > irc > >>>client for the Half Life console. >>> >>>These are the only two changes to my HL install. I unloaded the HLirc >> >>script >> >>>from Mirc as soon as it happened. I went back to the server and I never >> >>got >> >>>kicked again. Until the kick showed up on the servers stats page, and a >> >>few >> >>>clan members pushed the CL to ban me from the server all together. >>> >>>Below are the specs of my system: >>> >>>WinXP >>>Geforce 2 MX 64mb (using Detonator drivers) >>>Athlon TBird 700mhz @ 133x7(933mhz) >>>256MB ram >>>SBlive player 1024 >>>Only other games installed are Red Alert II and Yuris revenge. >>> >>>The server in question is run by www.clan-hq.com >>> >>>Basically, some people now think I cheat, and they are wrong. >>>I'd like them to know they are wrong. >>>Reid. >>> >>>___ >>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> >>please visit: >> >>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >> >> >>___ >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Alfred Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ...
Hi Adam, Pingboost 3 was pretty unusable for me, it caused lag from hell at times. And this was on a 1.1 ghz server with up to 8 players! I use pingboost 2 and it helped lower peoples pings by 10 to 20 with no noticable lag increase and cpu was about the same as well. -Bill - Original Message - From: "Adam Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Pingboost 3 impressions ... > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Hi all, I run a 20 ppl CS server on a XP 2000+ with 512 MB of memory on a > stripped down Linux 2.4.18. This is the only process running. It is > connected to a 10Mbit half duplex connection to the Net. I am wondering due > to the fact that pingboost 3 processing a frame EVERY time a packet arrives > and can cause extreme CPU usage, should some players experience "warping" or > sliding effect when they are all in and around 30 - 50ms with a server > average across all players of approx. 45 ms? Basically, has anyone else > noticed that when running pingboost 3 that some (1 or 2) ppl are > experiencing lag-like effect? > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] VAC problem.
Okay can IRC be used to play unfairly? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PiTaGoRaS Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. Err, hlirc isn't a client hook, or at least is what his autor has said. - Original Message - From: "MoD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. > HLirc is a client.dll hook, just like OGC. > > True, all it does is give you IRC, but valve don't allow it. > > Tell your friends to stfu... fact is valve didnt ban you, right? > > MoD, > > Always @ your service. > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:14 PM > Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC problem. > > > > Can you help please? > > > > I joined my usual server (80.71.2.84:27016 [5SI]Public Smoking Shed) a few > > days ago and was kicked to console with the follwing message: > > > > * > > You have been automatically disconnected from this secure server because > an > > illegal cheat was detected on your computer. Repeat violaters may be > > permanently banned from all secure servers. > > * > > screenshot: http://reidme.info/misc/vac_screeny.jpg > > > > It was a fresh install of CS that morning as I had installed the Merc pack > > the night before and found the player models too confusing and I'd lost > the > > function of the variable crosshair to show aiming stability. > > I re-installed HL + CS, and backed up the sounds/sprites/models dirs and > > installed the Mercenary Pack v2.5 for Counter-Strike > > (http://clanfmc.xrs.net/). I replaced the models folder with the backup > but > > kept the sprite and sound changes. > > I also downloaded HLirc (http://www.cscentral.com/hlirc/), which is an irc > > client for the Half Life console. > > > > These are the only two changes to my HL install. I unloaded the HLirc > script > > from Mirc as soon as it happened. I went back to the server and I never > got > > kicked again. Until the kick showed up on the servers stats page, and a > few > > clan members pushed the CL to ban me from the server all together. > > > > Below are the specs of my system: > > > > WinXP > > Geforce 2 MX 64mb (using Detonator drivers) > > Athlon TBird 700mhz @ 133x7(933mhz) > > 256MB ram > > SBlive player 1024 > > Only other games installed are Red Alert II and Yuris revenge. > > > > The server in question is run by www.clan-hq.com > > > > Basically, some people now think I cheat, and they are wrong. > > I'd like them to know they are wrong. > > Reid. > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: RE: [hlds_linux] Starting/Stopping hlds_L via web
have you tried to install webmin? its easy! 29/08/2002 02:03:27, "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >its pretty easy to write a cgi script to start/stop the hlds, just write up >a start/stop >sh script (I normally start hlds into a screen session) and call that from >your cgi. not exactly >secure. but heh, you can't expect that from the web :) > >Mat. > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
Although I do enjoy counter-strike, I run a day of defeat server, I'd really like for these beta-modules to be opened to DOD servers ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players
Quoting HD: " So, before jumping to conclusions like "it's HLGuard's wallhack block", " It is true that many times HLG *HAS* messed things up in the past although I don't think his intention was to shadow doubt OVER HLG ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Server Options
Good Evening all. I just set up my Half life server on one of my RH boxes last night, and it works fantastic. I am looking for resources for the different options I can configure on the server like logging, MOTD, and other cool stuff. Any suggestions? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] good es_ maps ?
hmmm, i never played in a es_ map, where can i download one to take a look? 26/08/2002 18:54:50, "[EFR]The HEAD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >yes they work, but i think valve didn't work on this kind of maptype >since.. uhm well before 1.0 (correct me if i am wrong) >es_ maps sometimes have bugs because the code hasn't been worked on for so >long. that's sad, but true because many people i know like es_ maps > >HEAD ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] mp_mirrordamage 1
im running latest hl and cs versions (plus adminmod and statsme), and seems that doesnt work :( 26/08/2002 15:33:19, Björn Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >Anyone got this to work? mp_mirrordamage 1 (i dont :( ) > >mp_mirrordamage <0|1> >Mods: cstrike >Default: 0 (off) >If this cvar and 'mp_friendlyfire' are enabled, any friendlyfire damage >will be reciprocated to the attacker. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
How many detections does it take for someone to be globally banned? -Original Message- From: Leon Hartwig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2002 10:43 AM To: Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List Subject: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28 We've updated the BETA security modules again (see #4 below to set your server up to use these). Changes for these modules include: - Detection of OGC 10.1b, Joolz, and GoldFinger. - Fixed secure-global bans not taking effect sometimes. - Fixed secure-global banned players being allowed to connect to secure servers sometimes. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] [OT] Dissapearing players
LOL @ the irony of someone sitting on exodus mentioning spam filtering. On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 14:08, Delirium Tremens wrote: > I see Mr. Brooking is another bright soul to place on my spam filter... > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players
I see Mr. Brooking is another bright soul to place on my spam filter... >>Dissable the wallhack block, the problem stoped. re-enable it, the >>problems back. >>thats jumping to a conclusion? >>Quick to jump to HLG's defence, absolute shit when it comes to giving >>the product support. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players
Exactly.. by doing what you have stated with the maxplayers, HLDS will do some INCREDIBLY strange stuff with tfc, including letting player cap the flag over and over and over without moving 3 feet... Strange but True! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of HoundDawg Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players Anomolies like these used to happen on my TFC servers. For a long time we thought it was due to something within AdminMod. For some reason, when we uninstalled AdminMod and Metamod, the problem would disappear. Then, after HLDS 1106 or some old patch like that or 1108, the problem existed even without AdminMod and Metamod. The problem was finally diagnosed as a simple thing like adding maxplayers to the server.cfg which would be larger than the default (6) or anything defined in the autoexec.cfg. I believe it had something to do with resource alocation in that HLDS alocates a specific amount of resources as the server starts up based on command line parameters and the autoexec.cfg. When the server.cfg requests more, it has unexpected results. So, before jumping to conclusions like "it's HLGuard's wallhack block", people should re-look at the issue because it could very well be not HLGuard. I would look at what you set in your server.cfg and autoexec.cfg files first. There could very well be a setting in that server.cfg that is causing this issue. HoundDawg United Admins - Game Server Admin Association http://www.unitedadmins.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players
I privately emailed Jeremy off the list. If anyone is interested in the discussion, please send me an email and I'll forward the private responses. HoundDawg United Admins - Game Server Admin Association http://www.unitedadmins.com - Original Message - From: "James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:19 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players > > Take it somewhere else guys. Jeremy, Houndawg was asked you to contact > him privately about this. > > I'm sure the whole drama has been caused by a simple misunderstanding. > > I know just replying is easier, but it's starting to piss me off, and > no doubt others are getting tired of it aswell. > > END THIS THREAD. > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:06:30PM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 11:50, HoundDawg wrote: > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28
We've updated the BETA security modules again (see #4 below to set your server up to use these). Changes for these modules include: - Detection of OGC 10.1b, Joolz, and GoldFinger. - Fixed secure-global bans not taking effect sometimes. - Fixed secure-global banned players being allowed to connect to secure servers sometimes. 1) This beta test is only for Counter-Strike servers...not Day of Defeat. 2) Anyone detected cheating during this beta test *may* get banned for it, but only for the duration of the beta test. This means if you test a cheat on your server while running the beta modules, you might find yourself banned from your own server. At the end of the beta test, we'll clear the bans that were collected before releasing the modules publicly. 3) We're no longer using port 27013 for the ban list. You will now see traffic (in/out) on port 27011. This traffic is to/from the ban list server. Make sure you have this port open in your firewall. 4) The password for the beta modules is "vactest", so make sure you have... -testmodule vactest ...in your command line and restart your server. Let me know if you have any problems with these modules and we'll look into them right away. Thanks for helping out. -Leon ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Dissapearing players
Take it somewhere else guys. Jeremy, Houndawg was asked you to contact him privately about this. I'm sure the whole drama has been caused by a simple misunderstanding. I know just replying is easier, but it's starting to piss me off, and no doubt others are getting tired of it aswell. END THIS THREAD. On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:06:30PM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 11:50, HoundDawg wrote: ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
