RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
> Yeah, man...that's what gets me down sometimes. I work for a software > company (not a developer, myself), and sometimes you end up talking to > some net admin that's trying to run your server software but is adamant > about NOT opening any more ports than are *absolutely necessary* on the > firewall...even if all ports are going to allow traffic only to and from > the one server box. It's weird, but a common occurrence, even among > highly trained admins. People seem to think that more ports open means > less security, when in reality it's not the ports that are security > holes, it's the services communicating through those ports. You've > already got at least 2 ports open (minimum), so why balk at a range 1000 > more for the service? I have a guy I code for sometimes who believes the same thing. That basically crackers can exploit "ports" even if there is no application that has them open. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
> Blocking all the other services doesn't help if you have one > that is insecure (or running as root). If you have nothing on > the machine but a web server, and through the combination of it > running as root (unlikely) and a misconfiguration or summat, > it's just as easy to break into as a machine with no firewall > and a whole bunch of other programs, all properly secured, with > the buggy/misconfigured web server. Moral of the story: root != > (everyday user || service account) Yeah, man...that's what gets me down sometimes. I work for a software company (not a developer, myself), and sometimes you end up talking to some net admin that's trying to run your server software but is adamant about NOT opening any more ports than are *absolutely necessary* on the firewall...even if all ports are going to allow traffic only to and from the one server box. It's weird, but a common occurrence, even among highly trained admins. People seem to think that more ports open means less security, when in reality it's not the ports that are security holes, it's the services communicating through those ports. You've already got at least 2 ports open (minimum), so why balk at a range 1000 more for the service? -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
Even with highest security, you are still at risk. Blocking all the other services doesn't help if you have one that is insecure (or running as root). If you have nothing on the machine but a web server, and through the combination of it running as root (unlikely) and a misconfiguration or summat, it's just as easy to break into as a machine with no firewall and a whole bunch of other programs, all properly secured, with the buggy/misconfigured web server. Moral of the story: root != (everyday user || service account) --agenthh SQLBoy wrote: Not even if "with the highest security on?" On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:35, Oscar N wrote: hmm, running stuff as root is not secure, not in any way, not even close... /Oscar White Tiger* wrote: He's wise! I love him :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of agenthh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs Crazy. As the linux kernel README says, "Never take the name of root in vain." It is easy and simple to run HLDS as a separate user. Sure, you may only have HLDS on the box, but that doesn't make it good security policy. What if some l4m3r somehow gets in and trashes the box, due to the fact that HLDS is running as root? Basically, you can run HLDS as root, it's just that running as another user has less risk, for no real work. Oh, and habits. Who knows, I've done this before, you might be working on some other box, and your default policy is to run stuff as root. You might just install something as root, especially something insecure. BAD. --agenthh ---Original Message--- From: John Hemmingsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 02/11/03 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs I currently run it as root, with highest security on. Only 5 ports are allowed in/out on server (the ones that hl/cs require) Got nothing else on the dedicated server, it is also outside my router. With own ip address. So I don't think running as root is dangerous :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- SQLBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.playway.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Tricky one! Erasing banfile!?!
I would recommend you put it in your startup line. Because if you have a BIG one .. Like me it takes forever to load on map changes...so putting on the command line is prolly the best way to go :). You must add +exec banned.cfg for the banned.cfg NOT to erase. Long story..Don't want to type White Tiger* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Hemmingsen Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Tricky one! Erasing banfile!?! No, I don't have "exec banned.cfg" in my server.cfg file. Should I? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Børge Amundsen Sent: 12. februar 2003 00:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Tricky one! Erasing banfile!?! You do have "exec banned.cfg" in your server.cfg file. I can imagine the server create the banned.cfg file is its startet with out one and then have to ban a ide. Other than that i cant think of more clues ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug
I've noticed it only happens when I've just changed maps and there is only a few people on the server less than 5. Once more people show up it shows up about 10 minutes into the map... For some on the server it never shows up again, and have to exit to come back into the server again. It's random for me however those are the times I've noticed it happens the most. JD Jesonis - Original Message - From: "Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Half-Life Dedicated Server Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Half-Life Dedicated Linux Server Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:45 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug > I'm trying to get the "disappearing radar" bug fixed for the Counter-Strike > 1.6 release, but I need your help! > > This bug has been very difficult to reproduce. If anyone has a solid repro > case (where you can get it to happen every time), please send me the step by > step details so we can get it fixed. > > Please send the details directly to me at: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks! =) > > Eric Smith > Valve > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs
yes. the case and everything is exactly the same except it is a .cfg file instead of a .bsp - Original Message - From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:52 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs > Eric Miller wrote: > > std cfg file format? how would that be? Cause right now I have that file in > > my cstrike/maps folder and it's not work. So if anyone could help me out > > that would be great > > std cfg file format just simply means the same way you woud put it in > the server.cfg. So like: > > mp_freezetime 0 > > A search on the adminmod forums for "mapname.cfg" pulls 2 pages of > results for me. You put it in the right folder. Does the cAsE of the > mapname.cfg file match exactly the same as the mapname? > > -- > - m0gely > http://quake2.telestream.com/ > Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug
yeah, Dont have any knowledge of what "causes" it... might want to post on csnation or something kev ->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tyler ->"Overkill" Schwend ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:32 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug -> -> ->I know of no such case... It seems completely random to me. -> ->- ->Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend ->"Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." ->"Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and ->irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." -> ->___ ->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ->archives, please visit: ->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug
Usually happens to me if I get dropped on mapchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tyler "Overkill" Schwend Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug I know of no such case... It seems completely random to me. - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Radar Bug
I know of no such case... It seems completely random to me. - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Tricky one! Erasing banfile!?!
No, I don't have "exec banned.cfg" in my server.cfg file. Should I? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Børge Amundsen Sent: 12. februar 2003 00:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Tricky one! Erasing banfile!?! You do have "exec banned.cfg" in your server.cfg file. I can imagine the server create the banned.cfg file is its startet with out one and then have to ban a ide. Other than that i cant think of more clues ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
Not even if "with the highest security on?" On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:35, Oscar N wrote: > hmm, running stuff as root is not secure, not in any way, not even close... > > /Oscar > > White Tiger* wrote: > > >He's wise! I love him :p > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of agenthh > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:01 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs > > > > > >Crazy. > >As the linux kernel README says, "Never take the name of root in vain." > >It is easy and simple to run HLDS as a separate user. Sure, you may only > >have HLDS on the box, but that doesn't make it good security policy. > >What if some l4m3r somehow gets in and trashes the box, due to the fact > >that HLDS is running as root? Basically, you can run HLDS as root, it's > >just that running as another user has less risk, for no real work. Oh, > >and habits. Who knows, I've done this before, you might be working on > >some other box, and your default policy is to run stuff as root. You > >might just install something as root, especially something insecure. > >BAD. > > > >--agenthh > > > >---Original Message--- > >From: John Hemmingsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 02/11/03 11:47 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs > > > > > > > >> > >> > >I currently run it as root, with highest security on. > >Only 5 ports are allowed in/out on server (the ones that hl/cs require) > >Got nothing else on the dedicated server, it is also outside my router. > >With own ip address. > > > >So I don't think running as root is dangerous :) > >___ > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > >___ > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- SQLBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.playway.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 13:35, Oscar N wrote: > hmm, running stuff as root is not secure, not in any way, not even close... 'Stuff' ?? Lots of 'stuff' requires being run as root. Its simply a case that hlds doesnt need to be, so shouldnt be. Being root != insecure, it simply increases what damage can be done when software/deamons/etc.. are exploited. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs
Eric Miller wrote: std cfg file format? how would that be? Cause right now I have that file in my cstrike/maps folder and it's not work. So if anyone could help me out that would be great std cfg file format just simply means the same way you woud put it in the server.cfg. So like: mp_freezetime 0 A search on the adminmod forums for "mapname.cfg" pulls 2 pages of results for me. You put it in the right folder. Does the cAsE of the mapname.cfg file match exactly the same as the mapname? -- - m0gely http://quake2.telestream.com/ Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
hmm, running stuff as root is not secure, not in any way, not even close... /Oscar White Tiger* wrote: He's wise! I love him :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of agenthh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs Crazy. As the linux kernel README says, "Never take the name of root in vain." It is easy and simple to run HLDS as a separate user. Sure, you may only have HLDS on the box, but that doesn't make it good security policy. What if some l4m3r somehow gets in and trashes the box, due to the fact that HLDS is running as root? Basically, you can run HLDS as root, it's just that running as another user has less risk, for no real work. Oh, and habits. Who knows, I've done this before, you might be working on some other box, and your default policy is to run stuff as root. You might just install something as root, especially something insecure. BAD. --agenthh ---Original Message--- From: John Hemmingsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 02/11/03 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs I currently run it as root, with highest security on. Only 5 ports are allowed in/out on server (the ones that hl/cs require) Got nothing else on the dedicated server, it is also outside my router. With own ip address. So I don't think running as root is dangerous :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
He's wise! I love him :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of agenthh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs Crazy. As the linux kernel README says, "Never take the name of root in vain." It is easy and simple to run HLDS as a separate user. Sure, you may only have HLDS on the box, but that doesn't make it good security policy. What if some l4m3r somehow gets in and trashes the box, due to the fact that HLDS is running as root? Basically, you can run HLDS as root, it's just that running as another user has less risk, for no real work. Oh, and habits. Who knows, I've done this before, you might be working on some other box, and your default policy is to run stuff as root. You might just install something as root, especially something insecure. BAD. --agenthh ---Original Message--- From: John Hemmingsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 02/11/03 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs > > I currently run it as root, with highest security on. Only 5 ports are allowed in/out on server (the ones that hl/cs require) Got nothing else on the dedicated server, it is also outside my router. With own ip address. So I don't think running as root is dangerous :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs
std cfg file format? how would that be? Cause right now I have that file in my cstrike/maps folder and it's not work. So if anyone could help me out that would be great - Original Message - From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs Eric Miller wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > ok, this is pissing me off. I've looked everywhere. I'm a newbie to this list. So i've probably missed this topic many times. How do I get mp_freezetime to = 0 when awp_map is loaded. Here are my server stats: > > adminmod > statsme > metamod > > I'm willing to do anything because this is not the only map i want specific configs for. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. > > - Eric Miller Counter-strike doesn't do this natively. With Adminmod you just make a mapname.cfg (eg. awp_city.cfg) with the info in it you want exec'ed in std cfg file format. Although there was no information I found as to the location where this file should reside: http://www.adminmod.org/help/online/Admin_Mod_Reference/Frequently_Asked_Que stions_FAQ.htm#QMapSpecificConfigs If you use AMX, then you will need this addon: http://amxmod.net/amx-plugins.php?cat=7#25130 More on this here: http://amxmod.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25130 The config file goes in the "addons/amx/map_configs/" folder. -- - m0gely http://quake2.telestream.com/ Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs
Eric Miller wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] ok, this is pissing me off. I've looked everywhere. I'm a newbie to this list. So i've probably missed this topic many times. How do I get mp_freezetime to = 0 when awp_map is loaded. Here are my server stats: adminmod statsme metamod I'm willing to do anything because this is not the only map i want specific configs for. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. - Eric Miller Counter-strike doesn't do this natively. With Adminmod you just make a mapname.cfg (eg. awp_city.cfg) with the info in it you want exec'ed in std cfg file format. Although there was no information I found as to the location where this file should reside: http://www.adminmod.org/help/online/Admin_Mod_Reference/Frequently_Asked_Questions_FAQ.htm#QMapSpecificConfigs If you use AMX, then you will need this addon: http://amxmod.net/amx-plugins.php?cat=7#25130 More on this here: http://amxmod.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25130 The config file goes in the "addons/amx/map_configs/" folder. -- - m0gely http://quake2.telestream.com/ Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] map specific configs
Well you haven't looked EVERYWHERE :). This question was just asked a few days ago. Create a file in your maps directory called awp_map.cfg and put mp_freezetime 0 in it. - Original Message - From: "Eric Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:47 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] map specific configs This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] ok, this is pissing me off. I've looked everywhere. I'm a newbie to this list. So i've probably missed this topic many times. How do I get mp_freezetime to = 0 when awp_map is loaded. Here are my server stats: adminmod statsme metamod I'm willing to do anything because this is not the only map i want specific configs for. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. - Eric Miller ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 13:11, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > I always thought it was the people who write long winded, > > politely stated insults that had the deep seated issues :P > > They're the ones who you don't want learning martial arts and becoming > proficient at handling firearms. Unfortunately, I am both :) Fortunately we dont allow those kind of people into our country :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
For what its worth. I am Eric's friend. He's crass and obnoxious at timesbut I consider him a friend. Can we kill this please? thanks! |404|Innoc`JF - Original Message - From: "Børge Amundsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:12:22PM -0600, Eric (Deacon) wrote: | > you don't have many friends do you? You sound like you need help... | | I've noticed that the insults people dish out are almost always the | areas in their own lives about which their insecurities are the most | poignant. The insult attempt "you don't have many friends do you?" | seems to be very popular among those people in whose lives the internet | plays a large role. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
> I always thought it was the people who write long winded, > politely stated insults that had the deep seated issues :P They're the ones who you don't want learning martial arts and becoming proficient at handling firearms. Unfortunately, I am both :) -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] map specific configs
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] ok, this is pissing me off. I've looked everywhere. I'm a newbie to this list. So i've probably missed this topic many times. How do I get mp_freezetime to = 0 when awp_map is loaded. Here are my server stats: adminmod statsme metamod I'm willing to do anything because this is not the only map i want specific configs for. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. - Eric Miller ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Linux don't create logs
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, My first post and first time setting up own server :) I have installed Redhat Mandrake 8.0 (linux) and cs offcourse. I am noob @ linux, but installed it and it runs just fine. I use adminmod on the server, works fine too. My problem is whenever i ban anyone it erases the whole banlist, so i must add the bakup over the newone to get everyone still banned. (i use SAMC list, 12000 banned wonids). I got Hlguard aswell, it looks like that one is working properly. I get problem with logging of the server too. I have enabled logging in cfg files, but it dosn't create a log folder in cs. So the server isn't logging afterall. I might have made noob mistakes, i don't know. I would be very thankful if anyone have any ideas how to correct these issues. Server ip: 81.0.162.154:27015 Sincerely [ZlD]Zelda -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
> They broke file scanning. Heh... You think it is good that ANY admin can scan ANY file in your system? Plz... Grow up.. That was a big security problem. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
How much time would you spend developing a product that is about to be superceded with the next version?? Valve would be very busy working on 1.6 right now I would think, and I wouldn't mind betting that the VAC stuff they are doing is aimed at the release of 1.6. Isn't that one of the main reasons the steam engine has been developed?? so that anticheat can be incorporated and updated easily and more often. Steam will let valve push client side blocks for cheats etc etc etc. Then again I could be barking up the wrong tree. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill B Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? I do know the original info on Vac, been running a server for 2 years now, thanks. Your comments about meds etc. are well, wow that's a great contributor to a discussion, niceyou don't have many friends do you? You sound like you need help... anyways.. I deal in facts and logic. Ok it's been what going on 8-9 months now? When was the last vac update?? Too long... They lost the battle with cheaters. Also they've spurned offers of Cheating Death and PunkBuster at times in the past. They broke file scanning. This doesn't seem like a company thats serious about it. Valve said they were coming out with it for all mods. Hasn't happened. And it's in Valves economic interest for all mods to make Vac actually work, or people will lose interest in the game because of cheater. I care about the game and the fun I've had with it. Most folks who run servers here do. If you're trolling for just the sake of trolling, leave the discussion to the folks who can and actually want to talk about things in a reasonable manner. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
its obvious you are angry right now. I'll just leave you to yourself. ; ) kev ->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill B ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:52 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? -> -> ->I do know the original info on Vac, been running a server for 2 years now, ->thanks. Your comments about meds etc. are well, wow that's a great ->contributor to a discussion, niceyou don't have many friends do you? ->You sound like you need help... anyways.. I deal in facts and logic. Ok ->it's been what going on 8-9 months now? When was the last vac ->update?? Too ->long... They lost the battle with cheaters. Also they've ->spurned offers of ->Cheating Death and PunkBuster at times in the past. They broke file ->scanning. This doesn't seem like a company thats serious about it. Valve ->said they were coming out with it for all mods. Hasn't happened. -> And it's ->in Valves economic interest for all mods to make Vac actually work, or ->people will lose interest in the game because of cheater. -> ->I care about the game and the fun I've had with it. Most folks who run ->servers here do. If you're trolling for just the sake of trolling, leave ->the discussion to the folks who can and actually want to talk about things ->in a reasonable manner. -> ->- Original Message - ->From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:09 AM ->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? -> -> ->> roflmao. sounds like fun. ->> ->> anyways, gotta love it when people flame w/o all the information. Its ->too ->> bad that you never paid attention to the original talks about ->valves anti ->> cheat solution, most importantly that their system wouldnt be complete ->till ->> they had their steam system working fully. In other words, until they ->can ->> force updates globaly easily at short intervals, their envisioned system ->> would not be complete, but rather still in testing. ->> ->> sure, of course they are milking the cs cash cow for what its worth. I ->> dont know any other game company that has stuck w/ and supported and ->> improved their product FOR FREE over such a period of time. my god. If ->you ->> havent gotten your moneys worth out of this product, you either have ->> derranged expectations (heavy on the derranged bit, believe me) ->or you are ->> just a flaming, idiotic, un happy person who needs to get out ->more, or get ->> back on his meds, or something. ->> ->> lol. who plays op for anyways? I'm sure it has its niche audience, but ->its ->> certainly not big enough to dedicate any large amount of resources ->towards, ->> thats just simple logic/economics/buisness sense. ->> ->> get over it. ->> ->> and try to think about about things before you flame. ->> ->> ; P ->> kev ->> ->> ->-Original Message- ->> ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->> ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill B ->> ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:37 AM ->> ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->> ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? ->> -> ->> -> ->> ->Yeah, gotta agree. It seems like valve has definitely given up ->> ->the battle ->> ->and doesn't care about VAC. The much vaunted "Global Ban" never ->> ->happened as ->> ->far as I know. I never even got to see VAC on my op4 ->server, probably ->> ->never will. Ah well. HLGuard and Cdeath have made valiant ->> ->efforts, and seem ->> ->to stop most stuff for now. Sound hacks still work though. How long ->till ->> ->stuff gets by hlg and cd again? I think when this next cycle of ->> ->cheats come ->> ->out and Valve still hasn't done antything, I'll probably ->take my server ->> ->down. ->> -> ->> ->Valve managed to create 1 gamethink they'll ever come out with ->another ->> ->that has real anti cheat integrated in it from the ground up? Nah, why ->> ->bother probably just keep milking the CS franchise till the end time. ->> -> ->> ->What the heck does Valve do all day, manage licensing deals for: ->> ->"CS: Condition Flatulent", ->> ->"CS:Were Out of Ideas", ->> ->"CS: My Kid Needs Braces" or whatever stupid thing they have licensed ->> ->someone else to develop for them? ->> -> ->> ->Ack. ->> ->-B ->> -> ->> ->- Original Message - ->> ->From: "Tyler "Overkill" Schwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->> ->Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:19 PM ->> ->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? ->> -> ->> -> ->> ->> I certainly feel that CS and HLDS have become pretty stagnant... ->> ->> I think Valve's support cycle for this stuff is coming to an end ->> ->> except as a testing ground for future products. VAC is way ->> ->> behind, HLGuard is way behind, and I can't imagine much revenue ->> ->> is still being generated... I'm looking into other games, but ->> ->> sadly, Linux servers and community-generated utilities are hard ->>
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
I do know the original info on Vac, been running a server for 2 years now, thanks. Your comments about meds etc. are well, wow that's a great contributor to a discussion, niceyou don't have many friends do you? You sound like you need help... anyways.. I deal in facts and logic. Ok it's been what going on 8-9 months now? When was the last vac update?? Too long... They lost the battle with cheaters. Also they've spurned offers of Cheating Death and PunkBuster at times in the past. They broke file scanning. This doesn't seem like a company thats serious about it. Valve said they were coming out with it for all mods. Hasn't happened. And it's in Valves economic interest for all mods to make Vac actually work, or people will lose interest in the game because of cheater. I care about the game and the fun I've had with it. Most folks who run servers here do. If you're trolling for just the sake of trolling, leave the discussion to the folks who can and actually want to talk about things in a reasonable manner. - Original Message - From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:09 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? > roflmao. sounds like fun. > > anyways, gotta love it when people flame w/o all the information. Its too > bad that you never paid attention to the original talks about valves anti > cheat solution, most importantly that their system wouldnt be complete till > they had their steam system working fully. In other words, until they can > force updates globaly easily at short intervals, their envisioned system > would not be complete, but rather still in testing. > > sure, of course they are milking the cs cash cow for what its worth. I > dont know any other game company that has stuck w/ and supported and > improved their product FOR FREE over such a period of time. my god. If you > havent gotten your moneys worth out of this product, you either have > derranged expectations (heavy on the derranged bit, believe me) or you are > just a flaming, idiotic, un happy person who needs to get out more, or get > back on his meds, or something. > > lol. who plays op for anyways? I'm sure it has its niche audience, but its > certainly not big enough to dedicate any large amount of resources towards, > thats just simple logic/economics/buisness sense. > > get over it. > > and try to think about about things before you flame. > > ; P > kev > > ->-Original Message- > ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill B > ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:37 AM > ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? > -> > -> > ->Yeah, gotta agree. It seems like valve has definitely given up > ->the battle > ->and doesn't care about VAC. The much vaunted "Global Ban" never > ->happened as > ->far as I know. I never even got to see VAC on my op4 server, probably > ->never will. Ah well. HLGuard and Cdeath have made valiant > ->efforts, and seem > ->to stop most stuff for now. Sound hacks still work though. How long till > ->stuff gets by hlg and cd again? I think when this next cycle of > ->cheats come > ->out and Valve still hasn't done antything, I'll probably take my server > ->down. > -> > ->Valve managed to create 1 gamethink they'll ever come out with another > ->that has real anti cheat integrated in it from the ground up? Nah, why > ->bother probably just keep milking the CS franchise till the end time. > -> > ->What the heck does Valve do all day, manage licensing deals for: > ->"CS: Condition Flatulent", > ->"CS:Were Out of Ideas", > ->"CS: My Kid Needs Braces" or whatever stupid thing they have licensed > ->someone else to develop for them? > -> > ->Ack. > ->-B > -> > ->- Original Message - > ->From: "Tyler "Overkill" Schwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ->Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:19 PM > ->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? > -> > -> > ->> I certainly feel that CS and HLDS have become pretty stagnant... > ->> I think Valve's support cycle for this stuff is coming to an end > ->> except as a testing ground for future products. VAC is way > ->> behind, HLGuard is way behind, and I can't imagine much revenue > ->> is still being generated... I'm looking into other games, but > ->> sadly, Linux servers and community-generated utilities are hard > ->> to come by for the majority of games I'm interested in. AA:O, > ->> BF1942... > ->> > ->> - > ->> Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend > ->> "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." > ->> "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and > ->> irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." > ->> > ->> ___ > ->> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > ->please visit: > ->> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_lin
RE: [hlds_linux] HLBook 0.99 beta 1 released
For those interested I have mirrored the file here: http://files.redphive.org/hlbook-0.99-b1.tar.gz Cheers, Red Phive www.redphive.org www.fragmart.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SQLBoy Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] HLBook 0.99 beta 1 released Here it is. Bookable Half-Life servers as far as the eye can see. http://hlb.playway.net/index.html -- SQLBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.playway.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list?
roflmao. sounds like fun. anyways, gotta love it when people flame w/o all the information. Its too bad that you never paid attention to the original talks about valves anti cheat solution, most importantly that their system wouldnt be complete till they had their steam system working fully. In other words, until they can force updates globaly easily at short intervals, their envisioned system would not be complete, but rather still in testing. sure, of course they are milking the cs cash cow for what its worth. I dont know any other game company that has stuck w/ and supported and improved their product FOR FREE over such a period of time. my god. If you havent gotten your moneys worth out of this product, you either have derranged expectations (heavy on the derranged bit, believe me) or you are just a flaming, idiotic, un happy person who needs to get out more, or get back on his meds, or something. lol. who plays op for anyways? I'm sure it has its niche audience, but its certainly not big enough to dedicate any large amount of resources towards, thats just simple logic/economics/buisness sense. get over it. and try to think about about things before you flame. ; P kev ->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill B ->Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:37 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? -> -> ->Yeah, gotta agree. It seems like valve has definitely given up ->the battle ->and doesn't care about VAC. The much vaunted "Global Ban" never ->happened as ->far as I know. I never even got to see VAC on my op4 server, probably ->never will. Ah well. HLGuard and Cdeath have made valiant ->efforts, and seem ->to stop most stuff for now. Sound hacks still work though. How long till ->stuff gets by hlg and cd again? I think when this next cycle of ->cheats come ->out and Valve still hasn't done antything, I'll probably take my server ->down. -> ->Valve managed to create 1 gamethink they'll ever come out with another ->that has real anti cheat integrated in it from the ground up? Nah, why ->bother probably just keep milking the CS franchise till the end time. -> ->What the heck does Valve do all day, manage licensing deals for: ->"CS: Condition Flatulent", ->"CS:Were Out of Ideas", ->"CS: My Kid Needs Braces" or whatever stupid thing they have licensed ->someone else to develop for them? -> ->Ack. ->-B -> ->- Original Message - ->From: "Tyler "Overkill" Schwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:19 PM ->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Quiet on the list? -> -> ->> I certainly feel that CS and HLDS have become pretty stagnant... ->> I think Valve's support cycle for this stuff is coming to an end ->> except as a testing ground for future products. VAC is way ->> behind, HLGuard is way behind, and I can't imagine much revenue ->> is still being generated... I'm looking into other games, but ->> sadly, Linux servers and community-generated utilities are hard ->> to come by for the majority of games I'm interested in. AA:O, ->> BF1942... ->> ->> - ->> Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend ->> "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." ->> "Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and ->> irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance." ->> ->> ___ ->> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, ->please visit: ->> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ->> -> ->___ ->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ->archives, please visit: ->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
