Re: [hlds_linux] Source and HL1 dedicated server Beta available
I noticed a high cpu spike on my celeri server, runing default FC3 install, with the beta, with no players, so I removed the beta. K - Original Message - From: Alfred Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com; hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:41 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] Source and HL1 dedicated server Beta available We have a beta release available for both the Source and HL1 engine. This beta fixes the steam id swapping problem amongst other small fixes. You can apply the beta by running the hldsupdatetool and adding -beta swapbeta to the command line. A couple of users in an initial test reported a server hang and associated assert (pipes.cpp line 298), if you see this please send me your OS configuration and hardware. - Alfred ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Eric (the deacon)
nice, which list is this again? oh i remember spam and spank me silly list! K - Original Message - From: Nic Strix [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Eric (the deacon) Oh dear, now I only have sympathy... N From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Eric (the deacon) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:03:05 +0100 Ever since I cam to this list wich was roughly 6 years ago Eric has been this way. I'm under the impression he calmed down since he got married so please just leave him alone and do what most the other guys do on this list, ignore him (when he's like that). :o) Have a great day! Tom - Original Message - From: Stan Bubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Eric (the deacon) It's simple, eric is a flamer. He's been needlessly flaming people on this list for years. -sb ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] spawn and sound issues
1) We noticed that we have some issues with respawn, have to wait until a teamates dies before we can respawn. 2) Voice won't work up until you go in the options and click on apply, this is only since about a week or so, that we noticed anyways. Anyone has a fix for this? Thanks K ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Crashes
agree - Original Message - From: Joseph Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Crashes I think he's saying that considering 100% of all linux servers crashed after applying this updatethey either didn't test it or the person testing it should be tested to be sure they have a human brain and they aren't some random monkey behind a keyboard. Eric (Deacon) wrote: In a bold display of creativity, forb wrote: They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. They released a faulty update that wasn't tested. I may have missed something, since I wasn't specifically looking for that, but what makes you believe it wasn't tested? I can understand saying their QA process for updates needs to be expanded or whatever, but to say it wasn't tested is probably inaccurate unless Alfred or someone actually said so, which would be odd. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: srcds with multiple ip address
Multiple Internet providers is supported by the kernel, have a look at: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html Replying packets will use the same NIC as the packet came in from for it's gateway. I have to test once again binding this to 0.0.0.0 but time has been the problem lately. I though i did and it gave me problems, as soon as you start using NAT with IP rule, it get complicated. Thanks K - Original Message - From: James Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:21 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: srcds with multiple ip address Lol. OSPF does not do that. OSPF is an IP routing protocol, that routes correctly between gateways by opening the (lookahead) shortest route to destination first. THIS DOES NOT SUPPORT TEAMING OR BONDED NIC'S! The solution is simple - add a port forwarding rule to the NIC's not set to listen by SRCDS. Forward to the IP of the NIC that is. The traffic will never leave the kernel after coming in, so you would get your desired effect. This WILL NOT show up with anything but the public IP in the steam browser. N.B. this is NO DIFFERENT from just using a second NIC as a routing gateway to the servers IP. In other words, if your on a lan, the server is connected to the net, and your server has 2 nic's, one lan, one internet, then connecting to the server will only use the LAN nic anyway, as the final routing portion is done inside the kernel. There is however absolutely no good reason to do this as far as I can see. The ideal solution is somehting like compaq's teaming nic's. You can also do this undex many modern *nixes provided your upstream switch supports it. Technologies NOT involved in this: BGP, OSPF, RIP, or any other IP routing protocol extension. You cannot solve this problem in IP. IP does not do this. Unless the server can manage multiple IP's you will always end up using the IP endpoint set by +ip. You can try port forwards and other similar tricks, but this will be unreliable in many setups. This problem is the sort that should be solved on the MAC layer, however, I still don't see the point. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sorenson Sent: 09 November 2005 21:07 To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: srcds with multiple ip address One thought on this, how will the box choose the proper route back to the client if the srcds server is bound to multiple IP's? You'd need something that forces it to answer a packet addressed to IP 1.2.3.4 from interface ip 1.2.3.4 and use the 1.2.3.1 router as the default gateway. Otherwise, what would prevent the server from receiving a packet on 1.2.3.4, sending a reply back on 5.6.7.8, and the client happily ignoring it? Or worse, sourcing a packet on 1.2.3.4, choosing 5.6.7.1 as the appropriate gateway, which isn't on the same network, and dropping the packet as undeliverable? There may be a way to do it, but I'm thinking a router running OSPF or BGP if you can is the way to go. - Dan * Dan Sorenson DoD #1066 A.H.M.C. #35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Vikings? There ain't no vikings here. Just us honest farmers. * * The town was burning, the villagers were dead. They didn't need * * those sheep anyway. That's our story and we're sticking to it. * ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] srcds with multiple ip address
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Got a server with multiple net connection which I would like to start using different IPs. /usr/bin/screen -S dod /var/dod/srcds_run -console -game dod -maxplayers 13 +map dod_forestfortress_b2 +ip x.x.x.x +ip x.x.x.x +ip x.x.x.x -pidfile srcds.pid -tickrate 66 +mani_path mani_admin_plugin Obvioulsy the above doesn't work as it will take the last argument +ip x.x.x.x and only use the specified IP. Is this possible without having to place a firewall in front of the box and doing some nasty nating? K -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] srcds with multiple ip address
I would be able to do load balancing on multiple internet connection doing it this way, probably just easier to slap a firewall in front and have multiple Internet address translate to one. K - Original Message - From: Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds with multiple ip address Hi K, K1LL3rD wrote: Got a server with multiple net connection which I would like to start using different IPs. Just curious but why do you want to do this? i.e. What is the purpose of running the same server on multiple IP addresses? If you don't specify an ip argument, I believe it listens on all available addresses but it might be that it listens on the first available one; I can't remember. -- Ben ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] srcds with multiple ip address
I really don't think this is possible, I don't think steam will allow me to bind the process to multiple IP addresses. The whole reasoning behing this is to be able to increase my upload bandwith, 2 or 3 different ISP which are conneted to the same box. Given some users are on cable, and some are on DSL, they could just pick the faster link. Of course you need to know all IPs in order for this two work but ... I have a linux gateway setup this way and it work great for ip rules and traffic shaping but again, I don't think the application will let me do this. K - Original Message - From: Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:23 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds with multiple ip address Regime wrote: Think he means a failover kind of solution, where if one connection fails, you can still use the other. Does not sound very usefull if you ask me.. but thats just my opinion. If you really want to loadbalance the way you say, you'd have to have half the people connect to one IP and the other half to the next.. If its even possible. Unnecessary awkwardness.. UNLESS... perhaps he means the server has connectivity with multiple ISPs, each of which have set up routing to his server with a different IP. So if one link goes down he could still use another. Although this has many problems, not least of which that players are unlikely to think: oh, the server has gone down. well i better try one of it's other IP addresses! ;) How are they going to even know that it has multiple IP addresses? etc etc ... -- Ben www.benkennish.co.uk ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Remote Desktop Connection for SUSE 10.0
SSH - Original Message - From: Genocidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 2:28 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Remote Desktop Connection for SUSE 10.0 -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Wow, shut the fuck up. I'm simply asking for some help because I've really never used linux before and I couldn't find a good program. I asked nicely and politely. But you have no right to tell me to use your brain and post somewhere else just because I figured, Hey this is a linux chat maybe someone here can help! I listed my OS figuring thats what you should normally do anyways. So it appears that I did use my brain. Screw you buddy. Glenn: Look on the site and notice that support for unix OS is only available in the enterprise version. On 10/15/05, JCHost.net - Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a HLDS e-mail list, not a Suse linux help list. Use your brain and post somewhere else perhaps? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Genocidal Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:06 PM To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Remote Desktop Connection for SUSE 10.0 -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm kind of looking for free apps. If it comes to it I might just buy it though. The only problem is it is for enterprise only which means more money :( On 10/15/05, Jason L. Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: realvnc.com http://realvnc.com http://realvnc.com Genocidal wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, I recently just installed SUSE Linux 10.0 on my server box that I own. The only problem with this is that if I need to do something with the server I have to run all the way down to my basement and do it from there. Are there any programs for linux to allow a Windows XP client to remotely connect to that server like Windows has its own RDC? I would greatly appreciate all your help. Thank you, ~TG -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Remote Desktop Connection for SUSE 10.0
ditto I agree. (although watching children fight is pretty amusing.) -- Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Rcon Issues with dod server
I think this was covered before but you have to make sure to include your ip in your startup script +ip 192.168.1.1, something like this. K - Original Message - From: InspectorGifts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:27 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Rcon Issues with dod server Any one else having rcon problems?? I cant seem to connect to my server via rcon. Im sure I have all the necessary ports open (if they are same as css) but in hlsw and in game it wont work. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
