Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] I am only running one server on my box, with default port, and i get lag. (100 tick) I have another server installed (66 tick war with srctv), and if i start it it lags much later, counting from the start. But it does lag also, after a time. And if it isnt running, the other server on the default port produces still lag. Sometimes right after the start, sometimes only 12 hours or so later... So sorry to say that, but this theory isnt correct. Maybe it has in your case more to do with the 66 tick. Locutus Arne Guski írta: Another apporach here to get closer to these lags that bug us all so badly: Ive heard about Providers claiming that they have no lag and after some checkups on what would be diferrent to my setup it turned out they use a single IP for every gameserver. That would result in all the servers running on default ports, unlike most of us who run multiple gameservers on the same ip with different ports. I cannot do large amount of tests, because i have a _single_ box where is currently only running one server on it. It is only an old P4 2.8 (without HT) running a Tick 66 server BUT i cant see the lag problem on it ! It has been running crowded for at least 2 days and i also do not see the 10FPS if i spam stats to the console. So as far as i can tell, this one runs perfectly fine, this is also debian starge with 2.6.16.31-1000hz-p4 preempt. So mayB something for Alfred to work on (i have no idear if they have multiple servers on a box or not) and some input for you to discuss, share, check, compare, think and bitch about ... just my 2 goldbars regards Arne Guski ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[1] ===References:=== 1. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
running 4 css servers on debian etch, amd64 x2 dual core with 2 ips (2x port 27015 and 2x port 1337) -> no lag. btw: i hope admins getting lag tried shutting down all srcds but one... Arne Guski schrieb: Another apporach here to get closer to these lags that bug us all so badly: Ive heard about Providers claiming that they have no lag and after some checkups on what would be diferrent to my setup it turned out they use a single IP for every gameserver. That would result in all the servers running on default ports, unlike most of us who run multiple gameservers on the same ip with different ports. I cannot do large amount of tests, because i have a _single_ box where is currently only running one server on it. It is only an old P4 2.8 (without HT) running a Tick 66 server BUT i cant see the lag problem on it ! It has been running crowded for at least 2 days and i also do not see the 10FPS if i spam stats to the console. So as far as i can tell, this one runs perfectly fine, this is also debian starge with 2.6.16.31-1000hz-p4 preempt. So mayB something for Alfred to work on (i have no idear if they have multiple servers on a box or not) and some input for you to discuss, share, check, compare, think and bitch about ... just my 2 goldbars regards Arne Guski ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Another apporach here to get closer to these lags that bug us all so badly: Ive heard about Providers claiming that they have no lag and after some checkups on what would be diferrent to my setup it turned out they use a single IP for every gameserver. That would result in all the servers running on default ports, unlike most of us who run multiple gameservers on the same ip with different ports. I cannot do large amount of tests, because i have a _single_ box where is currently only running one server on it. It is only an old P4 2.8 (without HT) running a Tick 66 server BUT i cant see the lag problem on it ! It has been running crowded for at least 2 days and i also do not see the 10FPS if i spam stats to the console. So as far as i can tell, this one runs perfectly fine, this is also debian starge with 2.6.16.31-1000hz-p4 preempt. So mayB something for Alfred to work on (i have no idear if they have multiple servers on a box or not) and some input for you to discuss, share, check, compare, think and bitch about ... just my 2 goldbars regards Arne Guski ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Couldnt we just get a version for FreeBSD 6-STABLE instead and drop Linux all together? My head hurts just reading about all the different linux dists... ;p One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, One OS to bring them all and in the darkness, bind them. Just so you know: http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/99mar/uf000446.gif /Bjorn On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Alfred Reynolds wrote: > I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the > problem. > > - Alfred > > DEPRE Gaetan wrote: > > So, I guess we'll need these information : > > > > Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags > > Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the > > server is running > > Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags > > > > Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. > > > > Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai > > György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 > > À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > > Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 > > only ? > > > > [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] > > Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. > > Locutus > > J.Miribel írta: > > > > Lets update then: > > So far: > > Debian > > Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) > > Etch - Lag (1/1 report) > > Fedora > > FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) > > FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) > > FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) > > Slackware - No lag (1 report) > > Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > > There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting > > srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon > > 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 > > tick we had. > > Azhibberd > > - Original Message Follows - > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian > > (sarge) only ? > > Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > > > >> Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: > >>> So far: > >>> > >>> Debian > >>> Sarge - Lag > >>> Etch - Lag > >>> > >>> Fedora > >>> FC 5 - No lag > >>> FC 6 - Lag > >>> > >>> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > >> > >> Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq > >> 1000hz Source running at 100 tic > >> No lag issues. > >> > >> Jeff Love > >> Burgh Gaming > > I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon > > MP 2800 > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > > list archives, please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] > > == > > == > > This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate > > content > > == > > == > > > > -TAW Signature- > > Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me > > LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] > > Aaron T Hibberd > > Contact info: > > Xfire: Azhibberd > > Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have > > cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please > > contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please > > visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please > > visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] > > > > ===References:=== > > 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 3. mail
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
- Pentium 4 3 GHz - 2 GB dual channel DDR RAM - Kernel 2.6.16.11 - HT enabled including the kernel SMT hyperthreading scheduler support - The preemption model is set to 'Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)' and 'Preempt The Big Kernel Lock' - Kernel timer frequency is 1000 Hz - Linux distribution is Debian 3.1 Sarge - the libc6-i686 module is installed (NPTL support and optimizations for i686 CPUs) - srcds runs with the default tickrate at 250 fps - the system load average is 0.02 until now i've not noticed any lags but i've seen two error messages on the server console and a frame rate drop on the server side to about 10 fps when shooting at physic objects. this wasn't the case with the last srcds version. the two error messages that i've seen are the following. on server start: net.cpp (932) : Assertion Failed: 0 == iRet && iValLen == sizeof( iVal ) && cSendBufSize <= iVal net.cpp (940) : Assertion Failed: 0 == iRet && iValLen == sizeof( iVal ) && cRecvBufSize <= iVal and while playing on the server: SteamStartValidatingUserIDTicket: Returned ESteamError 25 Phillip Alfred Reynolds wrote: I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred DEPRE Gaetan wrote: So, I guess we'll need these information : Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the server is running Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. Locutus J.Miribel írta: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag Etch - Lag Fedora FC 5 - No lag FC 6 - Lag Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq 1000hz Source running at 100 tic No lag issues. Jeff Love Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list pr
[hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
We have lags on: p4 HT (singlecore) Dual Xeon (singlecore but HT) Core 2 Duo (dualcore) all running debian Stable. Kernel 2.6.16, 2.6.18, 2.6.21-rc3 tested, all the same. Might be that this is also HyperThread related ?! i wont check that though becaus i cannot fiddle around all the time with customer (production) servers. With and without VAC the same, cant tell difference in the timeframe in wich the server stars lagging since its different all the time depending on the player count. regards Arne Guski www.server-sales.de ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
No lag on Xeon dualcore 2.6.18-1.2868.fc6 running srcds_i686 - Original Message - From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 7:26 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Alfred Reynolds wrote: I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred A64 X2 Dualcore 32-bit mode Debian Sarge using 1000Hz 2.6.16 has instant lag problems since the last steam update. Before that it was running great, although in the last months it sometimes needed a restart. Ewoud ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Alfred Reynolds wrote: I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. I'm using single core smp boxes (32 bit Xeon and 64 bit Xeon) and one dual core Opteron. All are experiencing this problem (And have been for a very long time now). ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] P4 3.6 HT (single core) here. / Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. / Locutus Alfred Reynolds írta: I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred DEPRE Gaetan wrote: So, I guess we'll need these information : Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the server is running Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 Ŕ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. Locutus J.Miribel írta: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[7][4]: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag Etch - Lag Fedora FC 5 - No lag FC 6 - Lag Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq 1000hz Source running at 100 tic No lag issues. Jeff Love Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5[8]] == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9[12]] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10[13]] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[18] 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[22] 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[23] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[24] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[25] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[26] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5 9. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9 13. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10 14. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1
[hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Glad to hear from you Alfred :) I have the problem on Xeon and P4 FSB 800 machines. I'll look into my core2duo and pentium D machines, I have to monitored all types of machines as the lag commes after a random (and often larg) amount of time. Best regards. Julian Alfred Reynolds writes: I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred DEPRE Gaetan wrote: So, I guess we'll need these information : Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the server is running Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. Locutus J.Miribel írta: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag Etch - Lag Fedora FC 5 - No lag FC 6 - Lag Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq 1000hz Source running at 100 tic No lag issues. Jeff Love Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the problem. - Alfred DEPRE Gaetan wrote: > So, I guess we'll need these information : > > Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags > Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the > server is running > Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags > > Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. > > Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai > György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 > À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 > only ? > > [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] > Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. > Locutus > J.Miribel írta: > > Lets update then: > So far: > Debian > Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) > Etch - Lag (1/1 report) > Fedora > FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) > FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) > FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) > Slackware - No lag (1 report) > Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting > srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon > 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 > tick we had. > Azhibberd > - Original Message Follows - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian > (sarge) only ? > Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > >> Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: >>> So far: >>> >>> Debian >>> Sarge - Lag >>> Etch - Lag >>> >>> Fedora >>> FC 5 - No lag >>> FC 6 - Lag >>> >>> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? >> >> Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq >> 1000hz Source running at 100 tic >> No lag issues. >> >> Jeff Love >> Burgh Gaming > I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon > MP 2800 > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] > == > == > This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate > content > == > == > > -TAW Signature- > Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me > LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] > Aaron T Hibberd > Contact info: > Xfire: Azhibberd > Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have > cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please > contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] > > ===References:=== > 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
So, I guess we'll need these information : Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the server is running Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box. Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? [ Converted text/html to text/plain ] Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. Locutus J.Miribel írta: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: >> So far: >> >> Debian >> Sarge - Lag >> Etch - Lag >> >> Fedora >> FC 5 - No lag >> FC 6 - Lag >> >> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > > Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq > 1000hz Source running at 100 tic > No lag issues. > > Jeff Love > Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag. Locutus J.Miribel írta: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]: >> So far: >> >> Debian >> Sarge - Lag >> Etch - Lag >> >> Fedora >> FC 5 - No lag >> FC 6 - Lag >> >> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > > Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq > 1000hz Source running at 100 tic > No lag issues. > > Jeff Love > Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5] == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10] ===References:=== 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com 4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux 10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Claudius Rücker writes: Hi Julian, Debian 3.1. etch is 4.0 or am I wrong? I`m just a beginner with Linux, Trick to identify for me an Debian sarge? Provider just say Debian... Debian 3.1 is sarge and etch 4.0 yes Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel (Low Latency Desktop) Preempt The Big Kernel Lock 1000 hz No Patch installed Ok, I'm compiling the same setup, just hoping the lag issue ain't comming from another kernel option :) Do you have a tip for me Which Kernelconfig would be best for CSS Gameserver? Patches? Not much to say, having 1000HZ is the base, I use preemption as well on my setup.. Then you need to know your hardware to disable the unnecessary modules.. Last question: Some say the lag issue ain't there if VAC is off, are you running with or withour VAC ? Still no news from VALVe, Alfred, moday is included in weekends oversea ? We definitly need answers now :) Best regards Greetings from Germany -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von J.Miribel Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:36 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? Interresting ! Debian etch / sarge ? Is your debian up to date ? Whet kernel config ? Preemption on/off ? Kernel 100/1000Hz ? Any patch to the kernel ? You're the first debian user I see not having lag, don't let us down ;) Julian Claudius Rücker writes: Hi, Debain with Kernel 2.6.20.3 no lags. Update since yesterday. No lags anymore. Greetz Stullen Andi -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von DEPRE Gaetan Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:02 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? Sarge (2.6.20-1 customized) & Etch (2.6.20-1 customized) Same lag problems -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Regime Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 15:58 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, as opposed to just moaning at Valve. --- Regime Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
I have SuSE 9.3 and I have lags :( J.Miribel schrieb: Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> So far: >> >> Debian >> Sarge - Lag >> Etch - Lag >> >> Fedora >> FC 5 - No lag >> FC 6 - Lag >> >> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > > Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq > 1000hz Source running at 100 tic > No lag issues. > > Jeff Love > Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
AW: AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Hi Julian, Debian 3.1. etch is 4.0 or am I wrong? I`m just a beginner with Linux, Trick to identify for me an Debian sarge? Provider just say Debian... Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel (Low Latency Desktop) Preempt The Big Kernel Lock 1000 hz No Patch installed Do you have a tip for me Which Kernelconfig would be best for CSS Gameserver? Patches? Greetings from Germany -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von J.Miribel Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:36 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? Interresting ! Debian etch / sarge ? Is your debian up to date ? Whet kernel config ? Preemption on/off ? Kernel 100/1000Hz ? Any patch to the kernel ? You're the first debian user I see not having lag, don't let us down ;) Julian Claudius Rücker writes: > Hi, > > Debain with Kernel 2.6.20.3 no lags. Update since yesterday. No lags > anymore. > > Greetz Stullen Andi > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von DEPRE Gaetan > Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:02 > An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Betreff: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? > > Sarge (2.6.20-1 customized) & Etch (2.6.20-1 customized) > > Same lag problems > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Regime > Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 15:58 > À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? > > As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. > Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, > as opposed to just moaning at Valve. > --- > Regime > >> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? >> There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting >> srcds ! > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Interresting ! Debian etch / sarge ? Is your debian up to date ? Whet kernel config ? Preemption on/off ? Kernel 100/1000Hz ? Any patch to the kernel ? You're the first debian user I see not having lag, don't let us down ;) Julian Claudius Rücker writes: Hi, Debain with Kernel 2.6.20.3 no lags. Update since yesterday. No lags anymore. Greetz Stullen Andi -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von DEPRE Gaetan Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:02 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? Sarge (2.6.20-1 customized) & Etch (2.6.20-1 customized) Same lag problems -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Regime Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 15:58 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, as opposed to just moaning at Valve. --- Regime Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
disabled VAC than everything is good macht VAC aus dann geht alles mfg hellermann _ Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
AW: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Hi, Debain with Kernel 2.6.20.3 no lags. Update since yesterday. No lags anymore. Greetz Stullen Andi -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von DEPRE Gaetan Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 16:02 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? Sarge (2.6.20-1 customized) & Etch (2.6.20-1 customized) Same lag problems -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Regime Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 15:58 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, as opposed to just moaning at Valve. --- Regime > Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting > srcds ! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Sarge (2.6.20-1 customized) & Etch (2.6.20-1 customized) Same lag problems -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Regime Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 15:58 À : hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ? As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, as opposed to just moaning at Valve. --- Regime > Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting > srcds ! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
As reported earlier, we have no lag on FC2 with kernel 2.6.20.3 @ 1000HZ.. Good to see someone getting some constructive 'research' of the ground, as opposed to just moaning at Valve. --- Regime > Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting > srcds ! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5 only ?
Lets update then: So far: Debian Sarge - Lag (1/1 report) Etch - Lag (1/1 report) Fedora FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag) FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports) FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report) Slackware - No lag (1 report) Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon 3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66 tick we had. Azhibberd - Original Message Follows - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian (sarge) only ? Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT > Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> So far: >> >> Debian >> Sarge - Lag >> Etch - Lag >> >> Fedora >> FC 5 - No lag >> FC 6 - Lag >> >> Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ? > > Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq > 1000hz Source running at 100 tic > No lag issues. > > Jeff Love > Burgh Gaming I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon MP 2800 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux == == This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content == == -TAW Signature- Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff] Aaron T Hibberd Contact info: Xfire: Azhibberd Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
