Re: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-16 Thread James Clark
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:40:07AM -0500, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
 James Clark wrote:
 3110b here.

 Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?

Probably =P  (game cstrike) (version 46/3.1.1.0/2147)

What ever that is?  It's been ages since I did the last update - just
sitting tight till one point six, man I'm getting hungry - I've been
sitting here for ages and they won't feed me.

--
James.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-16 Thread Michael Ressen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  previously said:

 Is the majority of people running this 3111c?  Or are you sticking
 with the 3110beta ? I've been watching and see different opinions and
 info posted regarding the differences and it seems that CPU usage is
 still a concern regarding these new releases.  Is everyone just
 accepting it and suffering performance loss or staying with 3110beta?

3.1.1.0c on all servers for the following observed reasons:

- Stability is equal or better
- No additional features warrant upgrading
- Performance is equal
- Resource consumption is less
- Better playerslot/MHZ ratio
- Works with all my existing plugins and mods
- 7 month proven track record

Point of note, if 3.1.1.1x was required in it's current form, hlds would
be gone from my servers in favor of something else.

Michael Ressen,
Michigan Burbs Network Administrator

www.michiganburbs.com


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-15 Thread Eric (Deacon)
Scott Pettit wrote:

I'm running 3111c1. The way I see it is that we just have to move on
with the times and realise that games and the way they run changes.
We don't *have* to yet, thankfully.  3110c still works and is currently
the best choice :\  I can only hope that HL2's server will be designed
from the ground up to be more efficient, streamlined, and manageable.
Honestly, HL's server, despite a couple black eyes (such as CPU usage),
is is still THE model for how servers should be done, from the support
Valve's put into the server part of the house to the actual *usefulness*
 of the whole thing, to the fact that it's a separate, dedicated
installation that does not require the game itself to be installed, etc.
 Valve, over all, has done a great job with hlds, and I'm confident
(well, hopefull at least :D) that they'll take what they've learned and
apply it to future server products!
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-15 Thread James Clark
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Britt wrote:
 Is the majority of people running this 3111c?  Or are you sticking with the
 3110beta ?
 I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted regarding the
 differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a concern regarding these
 new releases.  Is everyone just accepting it and suffering performance loss
 or staying with 3110beta?

3110b here.

--
James.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-15 Thread Eric (Deacon)
James Clark wrote:
3110b here.
Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?

--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] 3111c

2003-06-15 Thread Simon Garner
On Monday, June 16, 2003 4:59 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is the majority of people running this 3111c?  Or are you sticking
 with the 3110beta ?
 I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted
 regarding the differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a
 concern regarding these new releases.  Is everyone just accepting it
 and suffering performance loss or staying with 3110beta?

 Britt


I'm still running 3110 as I have yet to see any advantage to upgrading
to 3111 -- all it seems to do is *reduce* performance :(

-Simon

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux