[hugin-ptx] Re: Processing time of enfused panos

[kfj]

On 18 Okt., 01:51, tbransco  wrote:

> ..
> on similar issues I added the enblend options "-a -m 2 --fine-mask" to

are you sure about that? enfuse tells me that

 -m CACHESIZE   set image CACHESIZE in megabytes; default:
1024MB

so maybe you forced it to work with 2 MB of RAM only, which might
explain the problems. Just a guess.

I often stitch panoramas of the sort you have, usually 6 around, 1 up,
1 down with 3 exposures each, and on my slightly aged core duo it
takes maybe half an hour at the resolution you're using. I use no
additional parameters for enblend.

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] 360 degree panaromic image

[Ramazan Duvar]

Hi
I have six images.I must makes a 360 degree panaroma from these
images.Could I do that using Hugin's functions with visual studio.If
could I use James Legg's openGL preview it will be very good for
me.Because I will make a real time application.How can I do that?Which
functions I must use?

rd

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Processing time of enfused panos

[tbransco]

I'm new to hugin and trying to follow the tutorial "Creating 360°
enfused panoramas" by Bruno Postle.  I have a series of 3*6 bracketed
images shot with a full-frame fisheye lens, and seemed to have no
trouble getting CP's using Bruno's instructions, i.e., using
"align_image_stck" for each of the six 3-image stacks, then
"Panomatic" for the six 0EV images.  On the Stitcher tab in the Output
section I clicked the two Calculate buttons then checked only the
"Fused and blended panorama" and "Blended exposure layers" output
options before clicking "Stitch now!"

I had run into some problems earlier and as a result of my reading up
on similar issues I added the enblend options "-a -m 2 --fine-mask" to
the Stitcher tab before running the current stitch.  So far, no
errors, but my system has been busy on little else for about 8 hours.
The last 7 of those hours the console has been stuck on the following
lines:

C:\Program\ Files\Hugin\bin\enblend --compression NONE -a -m 2 --fine-
mask -w -f11476x4462 -o Christchurch_20101016_exposure_00.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0001.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0002.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0003.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0004.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0005.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0006.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0007.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0008.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0009.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0011.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0012.tif
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_0014.tif
enblend: info: combining non-overlapping images:
Christchurch_20101016_exposure_layers_.tif 1/1

My system is a Dell E-521 with AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ dual-core CPU
and 4 GB RAM.  I'm wondering if I should be expecting better
performance given the parameters I set?

Thanks for reading,
Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Automatic Control Point Editors And Panoramic Viewers

[Dale Beams]

What is the state of automatic control point editors available for hugin?  
Which ones are still being developed?  Which ones are considered defunct? 
Currently I see ...

Autopano-Sift-C
Match-N-Sift
MatchPoint
Panomatic
CPFind


What is the state of Panoramic Viewers?  Which ones are still being developed?  
I understand that FreePV is out of development because of a change in 
mozilla.  I've read on the list about issues with PanoGLView, though I 
don't recall issues with Ubuntu 10.04.Which ones are considered defunct? 
Currently I see ...


PanoGLView
FreePV
Panini
Pure JavaScript Viewer


  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Integration Queue - current status

[Bruno Postle]

On Sun 26-Sep-2010 at 10:58 +, Andreas Metzler wrote:

Pablo d'Angelo  web.de> wrote on 2009-09-20:

> 6. vigra-1.6 (Lukáš): it has been decided to push the changes upstream;
> wait for vigra-1.7 with the changes; then make Hugin work with
> [vigra]-1.7. @Lukáš and @Pablo: what does it take to prepare Lukáš' work
> to go into vigra; and how do we make it available to vigra?

I'll make a patch that fits the current vigra development version (They
now have an mercurial repository) and submit it to the vigra developers.



Vigra 1.7 has been released in April 2010, are hugin's changes already included
in this version?


I don't think anything has been submitted upstream, this still needs 
to be done.


There are some other libraries that should be removed from Hugin: as 
far as I can tell ANN and levmar are the same as the resepctive 
upstream versions.


--
Beuno

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and 
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: IMPORTANT: GoogleGroup Changes

[Bart van Andel]

Just deleted the files I had uploaded. I have a backup of these files
in case anyone ever needs them (not very likely).

Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Yuv!

--
Bart

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

[Andreas Metzler]

Yuval Levy  wrote:
[...]
> The Hugin PPA [3] can use an update.  The packages contributed by
> Philipp Seidel about six months ago are 2010.0.0 and for Karmic and
> Lucid only.  Does any of the experienced deb packagers (Andreas?)
> have source packages available that can be fed to Launchpad?
[...]

Hello,

I have not got any Ubuntu system to test and have not used a a ppa
therefore I do not know the finer points. However I would be surprised
if the packages in Debian/experimental would not work unchanged,
except for author and versioning. (I think even the *binary* packages
would work on ubuntu 10.10)

If you have got experimental[1] in sources.list this should work:

-

[as root] apt get install devscripts
[as root] apt get build-dep libpano13=2.9.17+dfsg-2

apt-get source libpano13=2.9.17+dfsg-2
cd libpano13-2.9.17+dfsg/
edit Maintainer and/or Uploaders in debian/control [2]
debemail=yourm...@address dch --newversion 2.9.17+dfsg-2~huginppa1 rebuilt for 
hugin ppa
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us -sa -S
cd ..
debsign -k resulting_changes
Upload. https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading

Wait a day or two to give the buildd a chance to build binaries of
libpano13-2.

[as root] apt get build-dep hugin=2010.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1
apt-get source hugin=2010.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1
cd hugin-2010.2.0+dfsg~rc2
edit Maintainer and/or Uploaders in debian/control [2]
debemail=yourm...@address dch --newversion 2010.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1~huginppa1 
rebuilt for hugin ppa
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us -sa -S
cd ..
debsign -k resulting_changes
Upload. https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading

--

Obvously you'd build and test binaries (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
-b  -uc -us) before uploading the sources.

cu andreas


[1]
deb-src ftp://ftp.at.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main
[2] I am not sure about the ppa policy, but judging from the existing
packages you would delete Uploaders and set yourself as Maintainer.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 14:55, Yuval Levy  wrote:
> sorry to read this.  No, the error message does not look familiar to me.  It
> seems to be a runtime error.  Have you tried with a jpeg image? or a tiff with
> different compression?  I have not tried panoglview in more than two years...
>

the error is what I'd call 'unconditional' ;) - it occurs even when
calling panoglview without any parameters.

> What are your machine's specs?

I'm running an IBM Thinkpad R60e with 4G RAM. Processor's a T2300 @
1.66 GHz, also called a Core Duo, first generation double core, but
annoyingly in my case it doesn't do VT extensions. The graphics is
done by a 945GM chipset. I don't know how much memory is set aside for
the graphics - it definitely doesn't have any dedicated video RAM.

I'll see if there are any configuration options - I like what I've
seen of Panini and I'd be happy to get it to work for me. Until then
I've found a manageable alternative - I revisited Fulvio Senore's
website and noticed him mentioning that FSPViewer works under wine.
Tried that, works fine.

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

[Yuval Levy]

On October 17, 2010 07:09:54 am JeCh wrote:
> I tried Hugin 2010.3 Windows build from this thread:
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/7740afd5982d1
> a6
> 
> Unfortunately the problem with non-ASCII characters is still there.
> Are the changes in the system for running external programs, you were
> talking about, already implemented in this version? Thank you.

Most likely yes.  The new makefile lib has been integrated into 2010.3.

Sorry to read that the problem with non-ASCII characters is still there. 

The bug is reported [0], however I vaguely recall somebody saying that a 
solution would be to use the windows short path names and I don't find it 
mentioned in the bug report.  It was too late in the 2010.2 release cycle to 
try, but maybe it is something you want to try for 2010.3 before we branch out 
2010.4 for release?

Yuv

[0] 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[Yuval Levy]

On October 17, 2010 05:25:55 am kfj wrote:
> oops... maybe I've been barking up the wrong tree all along. Sorry for
> all the noise I created because of my naively following the wiki and
> installing Dale's packets. I'll start afresh.

don't worry.  as the Italian say goes:  "can che abbaia non morde" - a barking 
dog does not bite.  No harm done.


On October 17, 2010 06:50:21 am kfj wrote:
> > I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.
> 
> still no joy with panoglview. Does this look familiar to anyone

sorry to read this.  No, the error message does not look familiar to me.  It 
seems to be a runtime error.  Have you tried with a jpeg image? or a tiff with 
different compression?  I have not tried panoglview in more than two years...


On October 17, 2010 07:38:42 am kfj wrote:
> On 17 Okt., 13:21, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
> > spherical 360X180 panorama.
> 
> I used the 'sherical' setting for my image, since it's a spherical
> panorama, after all. Using the equirectangular setting, it displays
> correctly now. I thought the two were the same? What's the difference?

I don't recall the difference, sorry.  What I do know is that the Panini 
terminology refers to the projection of the input image.  Your "spherical 
360x180 panorama" can be projected in many different ways, all representing the 
same "spherical space".  E.g. it can be an ordered list of six rectilinear 
cubefaces; a sinusoidal projection; or, as in your case an equirectangular 
projection.

> And, yes, it's very lo-res on my machine. Is there any way to get it
> to create more detail, never mind the performance?

Weird.  I use an IGP as well.  In the video at [0] you can see panini panning 
a 7000x3500 equirect in full resolution on my meanwhile deceased dynobook -- 
1.6GHz Pentium M with 2 MB RAM and 915GM chipset (Intel Graphics Media 
Accelerator 900 with up to 128 MB shared system memory).  The panning was 
smooth enough / comparable to QuickTimeVR.

What are your machine's specs?

[0] 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

[Yuval Levy]

Hi everybody!

On October 17, 2010 05:26:27 am Florian Achleitner wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> 
> On So, 2010-10-17 at 08:50 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> > > 2. dpkg was tolerant of this in the past.  Now it throws an error if a
> > > folder  does not exist / is not created properly.  A well crafted deb
> > > package creates folders properly.
> > 
> > This is to be corrected.
> > Lately I got a mail from Marijn Ros (mar...@mad.scientist.com). As it
> > turned out, the cmake 2.8.2 is broken, not dpkg. The upcoming version
> > 2.8.3 will be corrected.
> > In the deb-package there is a tar-file
> > 
> > data.tar.gz
> > 
> > which lacks the directory information. I never before have seen such a
> > tar-file. Certainly not created with tar-command.
> 
> I think thats the point!

Thanks, Bob, Kornel, Florian for explaining the detail of how things work.  I 
stand indeed corrected in my assumption that the change was with dpkg, however 
I never stated that dpkg is broken - only that it is less tolerant of the 
broken deb packages produced by CMake.

Thanks also to Marijn for the workaround posted to the wiki page.

Even without this latest extra CMake bug, the situation (bad CMake-generated 
deb) still stands and so does my suggested solution:  to build and distribute 
proper deb packages using a PPA [0], uploading a source package [1] and 
letting the Ubuntu/Canonical infrastructure do the building, making sure that 
the package complies with the proper specifications [2].

The Hugin PPA [3] can use an update.  The packages contributed by Philipp
Seidel about six months ago are 2010.0.0 and for Karmic and Lucid only.  Does 
any of the experienced deb packagers (Andreas?) have source packages available 
that can be fed to Launchpad?

This is still unchartered territory for me and I don't trust myself doing it.  
I barely started reading the documentation about deb packaging and honestly I 
have little interest in the area of packaging and distribution.  However  I 
think it would be nice to provide 'buntu users with an up to date PPA so that 
all they have to do to get our latest release is

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hugin/hugin-builds
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install hugin enblend autopano-sift-c panini

Yuv


[0] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA
[1] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete
[3] https://launchpad.net/~hugin 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 13:21, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
> spherical 360X180 panorama.

I used the 'sherical' setting for my image, since it's a spherical
panorama, after all. Using the equirectangular setting, it displays
correctly now. I thought the two were the same? What's the difference?
And, yes, it's very lo-res on my machine. Is there any way to get it
to create more detail, never mind the performance?

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 04:11, Yuval Levy  wrote:

> For viewing the panos (and more), I highly recommend Panini.  I've added the
> instruction on the wiki page [0]
>
> Yuv

Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
spherical 360X180 panorama. And it's a bit rough, with all the debug
mesages popping up. Maybe I'm doing the wrong thing with it? I'll try
for a while and see if I can make it work for me. I only have on-board
graphics on this machine, and if I remember rightly from my previous
Windows experience with Panini, it only gave me a very low-res image,
probably for that reason. Maybe that's the problem here as well, it's
still the same machine after all?!
Is there a ready-made package of panoglview anywhere? I just can't get
the thing to build or run.

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

[JeCh]

I tried Hugin 2010.3 Windows build from this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/7740afd5982d1a6

Unfortunately the problem with non-ASCII characters is still there.
Are the changes in the system for running external programs, you were
talking about, already implemented in this version? Thank you.

JeCh

On 5 říj, 00:36, Bruno Postle  wrote:
> On Mon 04-Oct-2010 at 02:39 -0700, JeCh wrote:
>
> >3) Hugin can't process images stored in path with non ASCII
> >characters. Usually the problem appears when running Nona. First I
> >thought it can be fixed by using a different encoding of .tmp files.
> >But that didn't help. So I tried to convert the path to the short
> >(DOS) names and that fixed the problem. The same problem appears if I
> >try to use Autopano-SIFT-C multirow.
>
> I'm guessing you are using Windows with a Russian codepage?  Hugin
> works fine with non-ascii characters on OS X, Windows and Linux, but
> apparently not on Windows with Russian/Czech character sets.  This
> has been a known problem for a long time, but is impossible to fix
> without a developer who has this particular combination.
>
> The entire system for running external programs has been rewritten
> in the current trunk/default branch.  So hopefully this problem is
> already fixed there, but it won't be possible to backport these
> major changes to the 2010.2 branch (we would very much like you to
> test this new code if you can).
>
> Bruno

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 12:16, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.

still no joy with panoglview. Does this look familiar to anyone:

k...@anja:~/src/panoglview/pglv.hg$ panoglview ~/Bilder/*4/*_fused.tif
The program 'panoglview' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)'.
  (Details: serial 345 error_code 9 request_code 137 minor_code 8)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported
asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error()
function.)
k...@anja:~/src/panoglview/pglv.hg$

Thanks again for the updated wiki, apart from panoglview, I managed to
compile and install everything!

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 04:01, Yuval Levy  wrote:

> You are free to do what you want on your website and with your resources.
> Lemmings are free to follow each other to the abyss.  For those not wanting to
> build to use new features there are better options.  They are now documented
> on the wiki page as well.  I recommend the deb packages by Philipp Seidel -
> they have been built according to the canonical way of building packages.

Here's from a lemming. I reverted my Kubuntu 10.10 virgin vm to just
after building enblend and left it there, the botched branch in the
abyss. It was a learning experience, nevertheless, and now the vm is
sitting there for the next occasion I need a virgin system to try
silly stuff on. Disregard my comments on KpackageKit vs apt-get, it
was probably just some confusion arising from trying to do the
impossible after a day of hard work...
With the revised wiki I went back to work with a new checkout of
2010.3, got all the dependencies, ran cmake, ran make package,
waited... it went past 63% ... completed ... installed ... RUNS
Thanks for the rectifications, and sorry again for all the noise.
Hopefully I'll be able to do something productive eventually...
I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

[Kornel Benko]

Am Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010 schrieb Florian Achleitner:
> Hi everybody!
> 
> On So, 2010-10-17 at 08:50 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> > > 2. dpkg was tolerant of this in the past.  Now it throws an error if a
> > > folder  does not exist / is not created properly.  A well crafted deb
> > > package creates folders properly.
> > 
> > This is to be corrected.
> > Lately I got a mail from Marijn Ros (mar...@mad.scientist.com). As it
> > turned out, the cmake 2.8.2 is broken, not dpkg. The upcoming version
> > 2.8.3 will be corrected.
> > In the deb-package there is a tar-file
> > 
> > data.tar.gz
> > 
> > which lacks the directory information. I never before have seen such a
> > tar-file. Certainly not created with tar-command.
> 
> I think thats the point!
> I can confirm that on my ubuntu 10.10 (having the same problem). The tar
> file doesn't contain dirs.
> According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/ cmake was 2.8.0 in lucid and is
> now 2.8.2.
> 
> I unpacked an inspected the data.tar.gz in a libpano deb file I built
> before upgrading on lucid. And it _does_ contain the dirs.
> 
> > Here is the proposed work-around for e.g. libpano13 for users having this 
> > cmake version:
> > #mkdir unpacked
> > #cd unpacked
> > #ar x ../libpano13.build/libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb
> > #mkdir untarred
> > #cd untarred
> > #tar zxvf ../data.tar.gz
> > #tar czf ../data.tar.gz .
> > #cd ..
> > #ar a ../libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb debian-binary control.tar.gz
> > data.tar.gz ...
> 
> I tried this with libpano. The tar file created by tar contains dirs and
> the repacked deb installs nicely.
> 
> But ar a doesn't seem to be a valid operation. I used
> #ar r ../libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb debian-binary control.tar.gz
> data.tar.gz
> instead.

Yes, I should mention "untested" first. And yes, "r" is the correct parameter 
for existing files. 

Kornel

-- 
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

[Florian Achleitner]

Hi everybody!


On So, 2010-10-17 at 08:50 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> > 2. dpkg was tolerant of this in the past.  Now it throws an error if a
> > folder  does not exist / is not created properly.  A well crafted deb
> > package creates folders properly.
> 
> This is to be corrected.
> Lately I got a mail from Marijn Ros (mar...@mad.scientist.com). As it turned 
> out, the cmake 2.8.2 is broken, not dpkg.
> The upcoming version 2.8.3 will be corrected.
> In the deb-package there is a tar-file
>   data.tar.gz
> which lacks the directory information. I never before have seen such a 
> tar-file. Certainly not created with tar-command.

I think thats the point!
I can confirm that on my ubuntu 10.10 (having the same problem). The tar
file doesn't contain dirs. 
According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/ cmake was 2.8.0 in lucid and is
now 2.8.2.

I unpacked an inspected the data.tar.gz in a libpano deb file I built
before upgrading on lucid. And it _does_ contain the dirs.

> 
> Here is the proposed work-around for e.g. libpano13 for users having this 
> cmake version:
> 
>   #mkdir unpacked
>   #cd unpacked
>   #ar x ../libpano13.build/libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb
>   #mkdir untarred
>   #cd untarred
>   #tar zxvf ../data.tar.gz
>   #tar czf ../data.tar.gz .
>   #cd ..
>   #ar a ../libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb debian-binary control.tar.gz 
> data.tar.gz
>   ...

I tried this with libpano. The tar file created by tar contains dirs and
the repacked deb installs nicely.

But ar a doesn't seem to be a valid operation. I used 
#ar r ../libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb debian-binary control.tar.gz
data.tar.gz
instead.

> 
>   Kornel

-- 
Flo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 17 Okt., 00:56, Yuval Levy  wrote:

> @Dale:  I find your activity to be spurious, random, conducive to confusion at
> best, and to damage otherwise.  Whether it is about build instructions or the
> distribution of deb packages.  Would you please stop and validate with more
> experienced contributors before moving ahead with your stuff?

oops... maybe I've been barking up the wrong tree all along. Sorry for
all the noise I created because of my naively following the wiki and
installing Dale's packets. I'll start afresh.

with regards
KFJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

[kfj]

On 16 Okt., 21:58, Dale Beams  wrote:
> I've had an exhausting week, and have decided to rest before i collapse.  I 
> do know that hugin will build.  Make sure > you have gettext and look through 
> the list of wx stuff ... "sudo aptitude search wx"

Hi Dale!
Please don't stress yourself because I'm moaning about my build
problems, since so far this is only my private endeavour to get to a
state where I can start looking at the sources (I've been trying for
some time now, first on Windows/minGW, where I managed to build
libpano13, but had to give up on hugin, and now on Ubuntu, where I
succeeded to build on plain Ubuntu 10.4, but I couldn't get my camera
to work there. So I migrated to Kubuntu 10.10 where the EOS 450D works
fine, but now I can't build...) so it's just me, no need to hurry.
Rest well, thanks for the good work!

> Towards the bottom of the page is PanoGLView.  
> http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/deb/ubuntu/10.10/20101015/panoglvi...

I can't get your panoglview package to work for me, neither on my
clean-ish vm [see below] nor on my normal Kubuntu 10.10 environment
[see also below], but I tried to build it myself, too:
It failed spectacularly, also with wxWidgets-related code, which is
one reason for my suspicions about the wxWidgets code used per default
by Kubuntu 10.10. Look at this:

make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/kfj/src/panoglview/pglv.hg/src'
if g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"panoglview\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"panoglview\" -
DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.2.2\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"panoglview\ 0.2.2\" -
DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -
DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -
DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -
DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -
DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -I. -I.-I/usr/lib/wx/
include/base-unicode-release-2.8 -I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -
D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -DwxUSE_GUI=0 -pthread -g -O2 -MT
panoglview-panoapp.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/panoglview-panoapp.Tpo" -c -o
panoglview-panoapp.o `test -f 'panoapp.cpp' || echo './'`panoapp.cpp;
\
then mv -f ".deps/panoglview-panoapp.Tpo" ".deps/panoglview-
panoapp.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/panoglview-panoapp.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
In file included from panointeractivecanvas.h:16,
 from panoframe.h:22,
 from panoapp.cpp:35:
panocanvas.h:146: error: expected class-name before ‘{’ token
panocanvas.h:148: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘wxPoint’ with
no type
panocanvas.h:148: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’ token
panocanvas.h:150: error: ‘wxPaintEvent’ has not been declared
panocanvas.h:151: error: ‘wxSizeEvent’ has not been declared
panocanvas.h:152: error: ‘wxEraseEvent’ has not been declared
panocanvas.h:159: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘wxImage’ with
no type
panocanvas.h:159: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’ token
panocanvas.h:181: error: ‘wxSize’ does not name a type
panocanvas.h:184: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
panocanvas.h:185: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
panocanvas.h:186: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
In file included from panoframe.h:22,
 from panoapp.cpp:35:
panointeractivecanvas.h:25: error: expected class-name before ‘{’
token
panointeractivecanvas.h:36: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of
‘wxPoint’ with no type
panointeractivecanvas.h:36: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’
token
panointeractivecanvas.h:37: error: ‘wxKeyEvent’ has not been declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:38: error: ‘wxKeyEvent’ has not been declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:39: error: ‘wxMouseEvent’ has not been
declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:40: error: ‘wxTimerEvent’ has not been
declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:41: error: ‘wxPaintEvent’ has not been
declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:42: error: ‘wxSizeEvent’ has not been declared
panointeractivecanvas.h:79: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of
‘wxPoint’ with no type
panointeractivecanvas.h:79: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’
token
panointeractivecanvas.h:92: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
panointeractivecanvas.h:93: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
panointeractivecanvas.h:94: error: ‘wxPoint’ does not name a type
panointeractivecanvas.h:95: error: ‘wxTimer’ does not name a type
In file included from panoapp.cpp:35:
panoframe.h:51: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct wxFrame’
/usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/utils.h:50: error: forward declaration of
‘struct wxFrame’
panoframe.h:53: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘wxPoint’ with
no type
panoframe.h:53: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’ token
panoframe.h:58: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panoframe.h:59: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panoframe.h:60: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panoframe.h:61: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panoframe.h:62: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panoframe.h:63: error: ‘wxCommandEvent’ has not been declared
panofra