Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 released
Hello Luval, I filed a new report. OS X Hugin reassigns Completed PTBatcherGUI queue list processeshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/830655 Allan On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: Hi Allan, On August 16, 2011 07:38:12 am AKS-Gmail-IMAP wrote: There remains something fundamentally wrong with how new stitch processes are added to PTBatcherGui in OS X. Thank you for testing and for your feedback. Do I need to open a specific bug entry for this or is there one already? If what you observe prevents consistently OS X 10.5 from stitching, you can add your observations to the existing ticket [0]. There may be much to describe the symptoms and the conditions needed to see them. Vary the names and sizes of added stitch processes for the same project to observe the symptoms. If what you observe is applicable only to specific situations that needs to be triggered, I would recommend opening a new ticket [1]. It seems to me that this is the case, and that you have done a very thorough job at documenting it. This makes the new ticket even more valuable. Thanks! Yuv [0]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/697039 [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: 20110623 hugin-mac-2011.1-5322_5c296e79fe54-build2 (NO 2011.2 beta build)
I was seeing this only when from the Assistant tab. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Allan and George, Thanks for testing. By now I have the idea that there is a bug in ptbatcher on OSX as somehow the queue status is constantly reset. I will file a bug in the bug tracker. Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: 20110623 hugin-mac-2011.1-5322_5c296e79fe54-build2 (NO 2011.2 beta build)
I tested this version on Tiger running on an Intel. It functions just like it does on the PPC 10.5.8. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:56 PM, grow george...@gmail.com wrote: Harry, Thanks for this version. You may have seen me commenting on another thread - about getting caught again by an old preferences file. I should have learned as that tripped me up once before! Anyway once I got rid of the old preferences things went a lot more smoothly. Later I ran into some other (small) problems with PTBatcherGUI. When I am in a cycle of stitch-- adjust -- stitch again ... I tend to hit the stitch button and save the output files each time with a slightly different name and into a new folder. When I do this the previous batches seem to always: a) remain in PTBatcher's batch list b) restart when I try to start a new stitch c) provoke a pop-up dialogue with Overwrite Files ... OK The problem is that if you have run a stitch saving the intermediate output files the list of files to be overwritten just gets longer and longer with the dialogue window stretching to accommodate the list. Eventually the bottom of window goes off the bottom of the screen taking the buttons with it. This leaves the user with no way of responding other than to Force-Quit the batcher and then relaunch and tidy up the batch before proceeding. all the best George On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi mac users, Another OSX developmesnt build. This is NOT a 2011.2.0 beta build. I'm still struggling with the PTBatcherGui concept to work on all platforms with parameters. If this works I will apply it to the trunk for the following beta build. What's changed: - removed Snow Leopards open from the bundle again. - I switched to a 2 step approach: Make a standard open call to open the PTBatcherGui.app bundle needed for a bundle instance running, after 3 seconds followed by a linux like call directly to the PTBatcherGui binary to add the project with all necessary parameters. It's a horrible work-around but I think it will work and on all platforms. - Still no python. Charlie Reiman gave me a hint how it could be done as well in a much better way (for those who followed the discussions), but for the time being it has reduced functionality. Hopefully we can improve that at a later stage. Information and binaries via my website http://panorama.dyndns.org/index.php?lang=ensubject=Hugintexttag=Hugin. (The binaries themselves are served from hugin.panotools.org who kindly provide the disk space and bandwidth). Hoi, Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2011.0.0_rc1 released
Perhaps these have been mentioned before. I am seeing problems in the Control Points tab. For example when starting to pick a point on the left side image a duplicate version of that image appears at the bottom of the frame and the right image enlarges a bit, overflowing the original space allocated for that image. Also, the operation to move a control point is not usable. The point does not appear to move. Allan On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Yuv, 2011/5/22 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch On May 22, 2011 12:32:43 PM Harry van der Wolf wrote: As always: Information and binaries via my website http://panorama.dyndns.org/index.php?lang=ensubject=Hugintexttag=Hugin . (The binaries themselves are served from hugin.panotools.org who kindly provide the disk space and bandwidth). should we wait a few days for test reports about this binary before declaring 2011.0.0 final? Yes, please wait a few days. I assume it will be OK apart from the stitching error on 10.5 Leopard (18-19% of the users) which still requires the work around to push the project to PTBatcherGui. It does work on 10.4 and 10.6. We've tried so much options and nothing works. I'm afraid it will remain a known bug for this release. so far there have been no negative reports from other platforms. I would like to close 2011.0.0 and move on to 2011.2.0 - python scripting. Yes. That will be the next challenge: to get it working on OSX. Thanks Yuv Thanks for your ongoing support to get a new release out. best, Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Towards a non-patented control point detector
Thanks Aron. This fix solved three weeks of problems. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Aron H aron.hel...@gmail.com wrote: Changes: Pablo, there seems to be a typo in the CMakeModules/ FindVIGRA.cmake, line 21 FIND_LIBRARY( VIGRALIBRARIES needs to change to FIND_LIBRARY( VIGRA_LIBRARIES -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: [OSX] hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download
Does a change to the Celeste parameters in preferences result in better performance for these images without removing desirable points? There are also people in these images. Sometimes they are also like clouds. By the way, from my perspective I am struck by the total absence of litter and excess body weight in these images. Allan On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:55 AM, grow george...@gmail.com wrote: Allan, Thanks. I tried the JPEGs on my machine and just as you had found ... Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were on the clouds. So then I created two 8-bit TIFF files and again Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were on the clouds. So then I loaded the original 16-bit TIFF files and Auto-pano-sift again created 35 control points BUT this time Celeste removed only 9 of them. I took screen captures and can see no pattern. The screens are here http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR__BeforeCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GBgsc=KotfnAsgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkP and here: http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR_after1stCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GBgsc=KotfnAsgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkPand as I said I can’t see much pattern to the cloud-control-points removed and those that remain. So it seems that Celeste is not as good at removing control points on 16-bit TIFF images. all the best George On 7 Oct, 03:52, AKS-Gmail-IMAP aksei...@gmail.com wrote: OSX hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 on this G4 removed all 64 control points autopano-sift-c had matched on the clouds in your two jpg photos. Allan On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, grow wrote: OK, Here they are: http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/5-of-9_IMG_0052.jpg?hl=en-GB http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/4-of-9_IMG_0049.jpg?hl=en-GB As for the other error - the crashing Enblend running out of memory - I re-ran the stitch at 10,000 x 5,000 and it worked OK ... I can live with that. all the best George On 7 Oct, 01:18, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: hi George, try with high quality JPEG. if we can't reproduce the error, you can always upload the heavier TIFFs in a second time. thanks for your effort Yuv grow wrote: Bruno, Can you upload these two photos somewhere? I am happy to do so ... at present they are 16-bit TIFF files and are each 70+Mb ... do you think that their size/resolution/TIFF-ness might would be significant? If so I can upload them onto one of my sites and provide a link ... if not and high-quality JPEGs would do I could make those and upload them here. all the best George On Oct 6, 8:56 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Tue 06-Oct-2009 at 07:18 -0700, grow wrote: This should probably have gone on a thread about Celetse ... but I am working on that panorama I mentioned with the current Beta and have found that I don't seem to to have the sort of clouds that Celeste recognises. This could be a problem with celeste as you say, or something wrong with the build or installation. Can you upload these two photos somewhere? -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Control point generation in difficult conditions - some success
I also tried a similar method with GIMP on your photos using other filters such as unsharp mask with the same substitution idea in mind. Match points were found, but they tended to be on the upper elements that would introduce parallax errors when used as match points. It seems to me that for these photos you need to match to elements occurring only in the narrow band in the middle of each image that is directly below the camera while also cropping each image in Hugin so that only that middle portion is used for the final image. It looks like reliable matching would be possible in these images if the auto process were to compare large areas for matching instead of small areas. Perhaps the processes have a variable to control this. Allan On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.comwrote: I made a workaround with some sucess that I have yet to try on a bigger scale than on two pictures. Have a look at this project [1]. I pre processed the photos using Adbe lightroom. I made quite radical adjustments: Sharpening 91 at radius 1.0 Exposure +0.4 EV Contrast +100 Doing this, APC finds 11 CP instead of 0. Of which 2 were completely off, but they are excluded automatically if ransac is used, see [1]. To the human eye (mine:-) the selected CP doesn't use the obvious and most prominent features, but this is still good progress! My idea is to run CP finding on preprocessed images, and then substitute these for the originals before the stich step. I'd like to understand the APC inner working better though, maybe there are potential improvements. I've been peeking a bit in the code of APC and the LoweFeature detector. It seems to look for contrast rich areas, is it using the colour channels separately or luminance? Any suggested reading? Dale, there is a reference to layout mode in the parameter list, but that may be one not-yet-working feature of APC (right?) [1] http://sites.google.com/site/thebigo1984/mosaiks/UW_low_contrast_workaround.zip?attredirects=0 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Changing [OSX] hugin-mac AutoCP parameters is possible.
Hello Harry, I thought OS X users should know that they could change the plug-in parameters. Your idea to save multiple parameter versions for the same plug-in type is a great idea. If it were me creating the Hugin interface I would not have the parameter settings accessible only in Peferences. I'd have the setting available in the context where it is used. In other words the parameters would be visible and easily changed with a double click on their representation. One way to do this would be to have the Peference pane openable to the settings location upon that double click. That same concept could be applied througout Hugin where applicable. I don't know how the different os packages are created. It seems to me that one can code the parameter less plugin concept without needing to change the current the OS X plug-in structure. Hugin knows all about these plug-in files. It can easily read each plug-in's argument line, report it in Peferences and then alter the argument if needed. Allan On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/9/8 AKS-Gmail-IMAP aksei...@gmail.com Harry van der Wolf wrote regarding the plug-in method for AutoCP matchers used in the OS X implementation: The disadvantage of Ippei's implementation is that you can't change parameters which you can with Thomas solution. Ah but Harry you can change easily the parameters for the OS X AutoCPs. In each of the OS X AutoCP packages is an XML property list plist file called Info.plist. OS X will open that file using the Property List Editor. Using the editor you may change the HginAutoCPArgs key to be anything you want. You may even keep the plist open after saving the change so to quickly change the arguments for the next AutoCP run. Allan Hi Allan, Thanks for your reply. I know that you can do that as I myself created a couple of them after the first release by Ippei. The same plist editor also gives you the chance to change the name displayed inside hugin. So you can copy them, change the parameters and displayed name and you have a new plugin The problem is that many users simply don't know where these plugins are or how to open them. I want to look into the option where we have parameter less plugins that can be selected and configured from the new Preferences panel. That leaves you with only one plugin per AutoCP creator, but you can call it many times based on the settings. Harry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
