Re: web IBMLINK - anyone else having an issue?
All DAY TODAY! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Justice Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: web IBMLINK - anyone else having an issue? anyone else having a problem trying to logon to web ibmlink??. (not that I'm concerned or anything with the 3270 interface going away today) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DSCOPY under 1.7
Hello We believe the problem lies in the way the USI exit was coded. Our new exit has a larger cushion for 1.7 that made us think it was DSCOPY. Thanks for your help Rich -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DSCOPY under 1.7 At 9/28/2006 10:52 AM, RLopez wrote: >Hello > We have DSCOPY running on z/OS 1.7. We upgraded to the newer > release which we downloaded from colsoft.com because of some S80A > storage problems on an older version that dates back to 1986. The > newer version available from colsoft.com seems to be failing (at > least in our shop) on region size unavailable periodically. The > region sizes ranged upward to 5-7M. This program is buried quite > deep in our customers JCL for over 20 years. Has anyone had similar > problems with storage issues with DSCOPY either with the old > version or the latest that is available on 1.7? > >Thanks >Rich Lopez I have posted (at www.colesoft.com) a new version that increases the amount of elbow room given back to the OS. I think this will fix Mr. Lopez's problem. Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cole Software WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com 736 Fox Hollow RoadVOICE:540-456-8536 Afton, VA 22920FAX: 540-456-6658 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
DSCOPY under 1.7
Hello We have DSCOPY running on z/OS 1.7. We upgraded to the newer release which we downloaded from colsoft.com because of some S80A storage problems on an older version that dates back to 1986. The newer version available from colsoft.com seems to be failing (at least in our shop) on region size unavailable periodically. The region sizes ranged upward to 5-7M. This program is buried quite deep in our customers JCL for over 20 years. Has anyone had similar problems with storage issues with DSCOPY either with the old version or the latest that is available on 1.7? Thanks Rich Lopez -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: BTAM on Zos 1.7
Thanks. We are at 1.4 and running successfully so far. We expect to be running 1.7 by September this year. I've heard rumors that it has been running on 1.7 and that lots of people out there are still using the 3745. Richard Lopez -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Pate Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: BTAM on Zos 1.7 We have a handful of customers who will still be attempting to use bisynch connectivity through BTAM when we go to 1.7 . It works fine on 1.4. - The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information may also constitute a legally privileged confidential communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: BTAM on Zos 1.7
Can I ask of how many people are stilling using BTAM and will expect it to still run under 1.7? Rich Lopez -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Rabara Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: BTAM on Zos 1.7 On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:49:08 -0600, Staller, Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Don't know, Haven't used it. However, circa OS/390 2.10 IBM provided >a procedure to "extract" BTAM from the SMP CDS so that it could be re- installed. > >AFAIK this "reworked" BTAM release has functioned through (at least) z/OS 1.4 >so I have little fear it will not function on Z/OS 1.7 (although I haven't tried it). > >HTH, > > > >Anybody out there know if BTAM still works on Zos 1.7 ? > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html I'm running BTAM for BSC connections under z/OS 1.6 RSU 0501 with no problem. If you're upgrading from z/OS 1.2 and applied an APAR gerated at that time, I think you'll be OK. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Billing for SRB Time
Charging for SRB time is something like shipping and handling. I'll charge you always for shipping (TCB) and you'll also get the handling charge (SRB) which are always combined and never separated. Rich -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Billing for SRB Time >1) Do you ignore SRB CPU time and not charge for it as part of your accounting algorithm? >2) Do you charge for SRB CPU time, but use a different rate than for TCB CPU time? Whenever I have been asked for input on this, I have always recommended against charging for SRB. It's not repeatable for the same job. Actually, even TCB is not repeatable. -teD Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
Hello Does it time out the same number of minutes eg. 10 minutes. Your message is exactly the message I had gotten earlier this year. "java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out" I had a similar problem when retrieving large amounts of SMF records which caused the submitting job to run longer than 10 minutes. I needed to increase the FTP timeout interval from the default of 10 minutes. The default parameter coded below is the default, which may time you out after 10 minutes. JESPUTGETTO 600 Increasing this value should get you working. Rich Lopez -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:56 +, Perryman, Brian wrote: > The FTP log shows: > SENT: LIST > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out I've seen this happen if either (a) there's a MTU mismatch (see your plumbers about this), or (b) you're using an active (rather than passive) ftp connection. For the latter, try to insert a LOCSITE FWF in the command stream, which enables passive ftp. -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SDSF authorizing
She could be falling into another entry. Confirm correct entry by having her issue the "who" command form the SDSF prompt. You will be looking for the GRPINDEX and the GRPNAME which should correlate to your definitions. Rich -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 2:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF authorizing > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John C. Wolf > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:22 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: SDSF authorizing > > > I havew a problem with SDSF under z/OS 1.4. I have a user who needs to > see jobs which are not hers. She can see a listing of all the jobs she > just can't look at any output. > The folling are the SDSFPARMS entries that I have set up but > they don't > work. She still gets 'Not authorized for job' message when she tres to > look at any output. > IUID(DSFADJP), > ACTION(ALL), > AUTH(DA,H,I,INPUT,O,PR,ST,INIT,PREF,DEST,FINDLIM), > DADFLT(IN,OUT,TRANS,READY,STC,INIT,TSU,JOB), > DSPAUTH(ALL), > ICMD(IDSFADJP), > IDSP(IDSFADJP), > The rest follow but I woun't bore you all with them. > Here are a few NTBL entries: > NTBL NAME(IDSFADJP) > NTBLENT STRING(A700SFA),OFFSET(1) > There are a lot more entries but these are the ones which I > think control > what I am trying to do. > She is trying to see jobs which are SFA I have entered all the job > names which end with SFA. > Thank for any help > > > John Wolf sysprog University of Cincinnati voice 513-556-0009 Does she have the appropriate RACF authorities in the JESSPOOL class? -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its' content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Z/890 CTC - Is there still a jumper cable available ?
I just saw a large flash over the horizon -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Clark, Kevin D, HRC-Alexandria/EDS Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 10:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Z/890 CTC - Is there still a jumper cable available ? All The 9672s use to have a special jumper cable for escon ctc. But I heard of a special black cable built into the Z/890 . Has anyone any knowledge of this "special Black Cable" , I am going down to open box now... Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
