Re: IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-08 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
We are trying to see if that will work but currently our FTP server is coded to 
have AUTH required, and so AT-TLS doesn't help (at least that's what we think - 
I have my network guy working on brainstorming as I type) 

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:00 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: IBM SoftCopy Librarian
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> > 
> > Has any progress been bade to make SoftCopy Librarian 
> security aware?
> (Using FTP/TLS specifically). We
> > are not allowed to use non secure FTP to the mainframe due to PCI
> constraints.
> 
> Might AT-TLS be a consideration?
> 
>-jc-
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the 
> message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
> http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> 
"Email Firewall" made the following annotations.
--

Warning: 
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail 
system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient.  This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended 
only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this 
message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify the sender immediately.   
 
==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-08 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> 
> Has any progress been bade to make SoftCopy Librarian security aware?
(Using FTP/TLS specifically). We
> are not allowed to use non secure FTP to the mainframe due to PCI
constraints.

Might AT-TLS be a consideration?

   -jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-08 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
Has any progress been bade to make SoftCopy Librarian security aware? (Using 
FTP/TLS specifically). We are not allowed to use non secure FTP to the 
mainframe due to PCI constraints. 

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN 
> Richard Yeadon
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 1:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: IBM SoftCopy Librarian
> 
> >Date:Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:03:02 -0500
> >From:    "John P. Baker" 
> >Subject: IBM SoftCopy Librarian>
> >
> >All,
> >Has anyone had any success getting the IBM SoftCopy Librarian to run 
> >under Windows 7?
> >IBM updated version 4.3 was made to run under Windows Vista.
> >However, when attempting to run it under Windows 7, I receive the 
> >following error message -
> >
> >IOException opening log file:java.io.FileNotFoundException: 
> C:\Program 
> >Files (x86)\IBM\SoftCopy Librarian\log.txt
> >
> >Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >John P. Baker
> >Chief Software Architect
> >HFD Technologies
> 
> A new version of IBM SoftCopy Librarian, that supports 
> Windows 7, will be on the V1R11 Refresh Collections being 
> shipped in early April.  
> 
> It will, of course, also be made available for download.  As 
> soon as I have an availability date, I will post it, (and the 
> appropriate URL).
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the 
> message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
> http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> 
"Email Firewall" made the following annotations.
--

Warning: 
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail 
system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient.  This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended 
only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this 
message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify the sender immediately.   
 
==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-07 Thread John P. Baker
Richard,

Thanks for the update.

John P. Baker

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Richard Yeadon
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 4:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBM SoftCopy Librarian

A new version of IBM SoftCopy Librarian, that supports Windows 7, will be on

the V1R11 Refresh Collections being shipped in early April.  

It will, of course, also be made available for download.  As soon as I have
an 
availability date, I will post it, (and the appropriate URL).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-07 Thread SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Richard Yeadon
>Date:Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:03:02 -0500
>From:"John P. Baker" 
>Subject: IBM SoftCopy Librarian>
>
>All,
>Has anyone had any success getting the IBM SoftCopy Librarian to run under
>Windows 7?
>IBM updated version 4.3 was made to run under Windows Vista.
>However, when attempting to run it under Windows 7, I receive the following
>error message -
>
>IOException opening log file:java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\Program Files
>(x86)\IBM\SoftCopy Librarian\log.txt
>
>Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>
>John P. Baker
>Chief Software Architect
>HFD Technologies

A new version of IBM SoftCopy Librarian, that supports Windows 7, will be on 
the V1R11 Refresh Collections being shipped in early April.  

It will, of course, also be made available for download.  As soon as I have an 
availability date, I will post it, (and the appropriate URL).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM SoftCopy Librarian

2010-03-05 Thread John P. Baker
All,

 

Has anyone had any success getting the IBM SoftCopy Librarian to run under
Windows 7?

 

IBM updated version 4.3 was made to run under Windows Vista.

 

However, when attempting to run it under Windows 7, I receive the following
error message -

 

IOException opening log file:java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\Program Files
(x86)\IBM\SoftCopy Librarian\log.txt

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

 

John P. Baker

Chief Software Architect

HFD Technologies


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM Softcopy Librarian cannot seem to access all z1.10 files

2008-10-06 Thread Binyamin Dissen
When I select DFSort-L in the PDf section I get 

java.io IOException: Server returned HTTP response code 403 for URL:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/df/zosv1r10p5.des

-- 
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-13 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
Yes -- and I'd love for Linux and z/OS support too.

Jerry Whitteridge
Safeway Inc
925 951 4184
  

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John
> 
> That's the entire question. Well, with a secondary question of "Does
> anybody else wish it would run on Linux or a Mac? Or maybe 
> even on z/OS
> itself under TSO or a UNIX shell or both?"

"Email Firewall" made the following annotations.
--

Warning: 
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail 
system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient.  This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended 
only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this 
message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify the sender immediately.   
 
==

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-12 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:48 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?
> 
> 
> I just took a look to see what the current release is, in 
> case I've missed
> one.  And WOW! the site is showing a LINUX version available.
> 
> So happy demo'ing John!
> 

Where? I only see a Windows download at:

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/applications/office/bkmgr/librarian.html

I see a __READER__ for Linux, but not the __LIBRARIAN__.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-12 Thread Matthew Stitt
I just took a look to see what the current release is, in case I've missed
one.  And WOW! the site is showing a LINUX version available.

So happy demo'ing John!

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:51:54 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:34:19 -0500 "McKown, John"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>:>That's the entire question. Well, with a secondary question of "Does
>:>anybody else wish it would run on Linux or a Mac? Or maybe even on z/OS
>:>itself under TSO or a UNIX shell or both?"
>
>Yes. Windows.
>
>Great stuff.
>
>--
>Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:34:19 -0500 "McKown, John"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

:>That's the entire question. Well, with a secondary question of "Does
:>anybody else wish it would run on Linux or a Mac? Or maybe even on z/OS
:>itself under TSO or a UNIX shell or both?"

Yes. Windows.

Great stuff.

-- 
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-12 Thread Kurt Gramling
Yup, strictly on windows - just fine with me.



That's the entire question. Well, with a secondary question of "Does
anybody else wish it would run on Linux or a Mac? Or maybe even on z/OS
itself under TSO or a UNIX shell or both?"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Anybody use IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2007-06-12 Thread McKown, John
That's the entire question. Well, with a secondary question of "Does
anybody else wish it would run on Linux or a Mac? Or maybe even on z/OS
itself under TSO or a UNIX shell or both?"

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian? (what was he drinking?)

2005-09-12 Thread McKown, John
OK, I'm the original idiot that brought this up. I've looked a Python
and it has some nice things in it. I especially like how I can route the
data from an HTTP GET directly into an ftp session without an
intermediate file.

I now have another consideration. Should I try to make this a "drop in"
replacement which can understand the current software's files (so that a
person could switch back and forth)? I ask because the "CAT" file is, to
me, an abomination. And difficult to read as well. Take a look at it (in
C:\Program Files\IBM\IBM SoftCopy Librarian V4\output\ subdirectory). I
guess it is an attempt to store data that is crossed referenced into
itself like an RDMS without an RDMS. It's giving me a headache just
looking at it. The same goes for the repository information
(repository.fil in the "output" subdirectory). I can't even find where
the "source" information is stored.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-07 Thread Jay Maynard
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:16:54PM -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/06/2005
>at 09:12 AM, Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >I can't speak to Ruby, but Python does.
> Perl runs (mostly) happily on OS/2; does Python?

Yes. See http://www.pcug.org.au/~andymac/python.html .

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/06/2005
   at 09:12 AM, Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>I can't speak to Ruby, but Python does.

Perl runs (mostly) happily on OS/2; does Python?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see  
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
09/06/2005
   at 08:31 AM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Being the original questioner, I will say that anything I might write
>for the "Librarian" functionality would probably be written in Perl.
>Perl is fairly transportable. However, I am likely to end up using
>modules from CPAN for utility functions (such an ftp and http
>functions). I don't know how portable the various CPAN modules are.
>It most likely varies greatly.

I've only run into one nasty portability issue in Perl, involving the
CGI module. The code "require CGI" messes up line-end handling even if
you don't explicitly[1] call any of the CGI code. The bug may have
been fixed by now.

[1] The require implicitly calls it.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see  
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/06/2005
   at 06:47 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Linux for what hardware platform?

I'd like to see binaries for at least AMD and Intel; zSeries would be
nice, but as long as there is a z/OS version a z/Linux version
wouldn't add that much.

>I'd hope portable for all.

That would be ideal, given acceptable performance.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see  
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-07 Thread Ulrich Boche

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does the subjunctive mean you perceive Java has failed to meet its
objective?  Has Java become platform-sensitive, outcome of lawsuits
notwithstanding?

-- gil


Java on a server might be ok but Java on the PC is a royal pain. On my 
ThinkPad running Windows XP I have a total of ten JREs - every other 
Java application brings its own JRE. Still, there are so many problems 
with application incompatibility with the installed JRE, especially with 
browser based applications.


For me, Java on the desktop is a dismal failure.
--
Ulrich Boche
SVA GmbH, Germany
IBM Premier Business Partner

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>However, I have seen considerable discussion over the last couple of years
in which a desire for a version for Linux has been mentioned.

So far, I have observed no response out of IBM.

...

Has anybody made a request?
IBM doesn't usually troll the various discussion lists for requirements.
-teD

In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
 -- W. Edwards Deming

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:50:16 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>>
>> You might take a look at Python, which includes a lot of the
>> things that you
>> need to go to CPAN to get for Perl in its standard distribution.
>
>Well, I like Perl. I have also used Python in the past and think well of
>it as well.

I'm with Jay - I picked up Python as a quick "proto-typer". Very impressed,
especially with wxPython giving access to the wxWindows widget set.
I find Python has some limitation with it's sockets implementation, but of
course you can overload that in need.
All up a (generally) nice solution.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Jay Maynard
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:50:16AM -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> I guarantee that I will __not__ even consider writing it in APL (yes, I
> have an APL on Linux) .

Really? I assume it uses an X window to display in. Is it freely available?

> I was wanting something fairly portable. Perl exists on almost every UNIX
> in the known universe, as well as Windows and MAC OS/X. I do not know know
> if Python or Ruby has such an extensive reach.

I can't speak to Ruby, but Python does.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Jay Maynard said:

> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:36:28 -0500
> 
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:31:37AM -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> > Parsing up these files should be so simple that even I could write a
> > program to do it. But the legalities stymie me. I'm a coward, I guess.
> 
> No, I don't think you are. IBM's lawyers are justifiably feared.
> 
There's a T&C page at:

   Linkname: z/OS and OS/390 Internet Library terms and conditions
URL: 
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/license.html

Which states, first and foremost:

   The z/OS and OS/390 Internet libraries are intended for use by IBM's
   z/Architecture and S/390 customers; other usages are prohibited.

Deep links that bypass that page abound in the WWW.  There are plenty
in the archives of this list.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Maynard
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 8:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:31:37AM -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> > Being the original questioner, I will say that anything I 
> might write
> > for the "Librarian" functionality would probably be written in Perl.
> > Perl is fairly transportable. However, I am likely to end up using
> > modules from CPAN for utility functions (such an ftp and http
> > functions). I don't know how portable the various CPAN 
> modules are. It
> > most likely varies greatly.
> 
> PLEASE don't use CPAN. You think DLL hell is a problem on 
> Windows? You ain't
> seen nothing yet.

I use CPAN for some things, but not extensively. Only for one project
and I have had no problems so far. 

> 
> You might take a look at Python, which includes a lot of the 
> things that you
> need to go to CPAN to get for Perl in its standard distribution.

Well, I like Perl. I have also used Python in the past and think well of
it as well. Hum, perhaps I should use this as a "learning experience"
for Ruby. I will refrain from using GCC or Java (although Java is not
really too bad). I guarantee that I will __not__ even consider writing
it in APL (yes, I have an APL on Linux) . I was wanting something
fairly portable. Perl exists on almost every UNIX in the known universe,
as well as Windows and MAC OS/X. I do not know know if Python or Ruby
has such an extensive reach.

If I wanted to be UNIX specific, I could possibly even use "standard"
utilities in a shell script. (wget is so nice for fetching stuff via
http and ftp).

> 
> > Parsing up these files should be so simple that even I could write a
> > program to do it. But the legalities stymie me. I'm a 
> coward, I guess.
> 
> No, I don't think you are. IBM's lawyers are justifiably feared.
> 

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Martin Kline
> That is a very simple text document which lists the other
> descriptor files. Parsing up these files should be so
> simple that even I could write a program to do it. But the
> legalities stymie me. I'm a coward, I guess.

My own rule for this is that as long as I am using the code for myself, or 
for the company that claims ownership to all code I write, and it is not 
distributed to other companies, then who cares? You already plan to write 
and maintain the code yourself, so you're aware of the pitfalls of keeping 
up with IBM's random code/format/link/security changes. 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This electronic transmission (including any
accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized
recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for
delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, be
aware that any review, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of
the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this electronic message in error, please contact us immediately by
electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or notify us
immediately by telephone at 1-800-345-2021 or 816-531-5575 and destroy the
original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments).
Thank you.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Jay Maynard
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:31:37AM -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> Being the original questioner, I will say that anything I might write
> for the "Librarian" functionality would probably be written in Perl.
> Perl is fairly transportable. However, I am likely to end up using
> modules from CPAN for utility functions (such an ftp and http
> functions). I don't know how portable the various CPAN modules are. It
> most likely varies greatly.

PLEASE don't use CPAN. You think DLL hell is a problem on Windows? You ain't
seen nothing yet.

You might take a look at Python, which includes a lot of the things that you
need to go to CPAN to get for Perl in its standard distribution.

> Parsing up these files should be so simple that even I could write a
> program to do it. But the legalities stymie me. I'm a coward, I guess.

No, I don't think you are. IBM's lawyers are justifiably feared.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread McKown, John
Being the original questioner, I will say that anything I might write
for the "Librarian" functionality would probably be written in Perl.
Perl is fairly transportable. However, I am likely to end up using
modules from CPAN for utility functions (such an ftp and http
functions). I don't know how portable the various CPAN modules are. It
most likely varies greatly.

My main concern at this point, beyond my ability, is whether IBM
corporation could sue me. I've read so much about this sort of thing
that I'm intimidated (as was the intent). Also, could IBM do something
due to the fact that my code would need to access their, publicly
accessable, web pages? For an example, the first "load" to do is via 

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/df/ebrscrt.des

That is a very simple text document which lists the other descriptor
files. Parsing up these files should be so simple that even I could
write a program to do it. But the legalities stymie me. I'm a coward, I
guess.


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Thomas Kern
A source RPM for Linux, then I could build the binaries on my RedHat laptop, my
Novell Linux Desktop workstation, my SLES9x server on the z/890 etc.

/Tom Kern

--- Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:55:28 -0300
> > 
> > I'd love a Linux version.
> > 
> Linux for what hardware platform?  z/Series?  Power PC?  SPARC?
> Other (specify)?  I'd hope portable for all.
> 
> -- gil
> -- 
> StorageTek
> INFORMATION made POWERFUL


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Jay Maynard
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:07:39AM -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> In a recent note, Jay Maynard said:
> > Heck, I'd settle for a Java version that wasn't tied to the Windows
> > platform, IBM is not about to do anything for Mac OS X specifically, but
> Because OS X abandoned the Power PC?  (In turn because the Power PC
> ceased to meet the requirements of laptops)

Pretty much, yeah. I'd be greatly surprised if IBM went out of its way to do
anything at all for Apple in the future (not like it did before, but...).

> > a platform-independent Java version (you know, what Java was supposed to be
> > all about) woul let me run it there anyway.
> Does the subjunctive mean you perceive Java has failed to meet its
> objective?  Has Java become platform-sensitive, outcome of lawsuits
> notwithstanding?

Java itself is not platform-sensitive (AFAIK); IBM's software, however, is.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cartwright
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?
> 
> 
> John,
> Have you tried it under WINE? I have not myself worked with 
> WINE, I just
> know how to spell it.
> 
> Dave

Yes, I tried WINE. The install failed with many error messages.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenner, Jim
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 7:43 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?
> 
> 
> John,
>   Always enjoy your posts!
> Have you considered buying VMWare for Linux and running (a 
> licensed copy
> of) Windows under Linux as an application?
> It's attractive because (i) you can run any windows app (ii) 
> and if that
> app insists on an older version of Windows, install that version of
> windows into a VM and bob's your uncle (iii) it is just S-O 
> C-O-O-L
> 
> Jim
> 

I already have a PC dedicated to Windows (a low powered PC). VMWare
actually costs more than that PC did. However, I have used VMWare and
agree that it is nice. Having multiple PCs is no problem to me. I have a
LAN and a KVM switch to switch my keyboard/mouse between PCs. I also
have used VNC to have access to my Windows system on my Linux system, if
I am being too lazy to push the KVM button . However, for personal
reasons, I would prefer to be totally off of Windows. I know that I will
never get to that point due to our wonderful LAN people designing "web"
applications which demand .NET in order to use them. I am trying to get
MONO on Linux to do these functions, but it is not there yet (probably
due to my ignorance).

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Jay Maynard said:

> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:52:46 -0500
> 
> Heck, I'd settle for a Java version that wasn't tied to the Windows
> platform, IBM is not about to do anything for Mac OS X specifically, but
> 
Because OS X abandoned the Power PC?  (In turn because the Power PC
ceased to meet the requirements of laptops)

> a platform-independent Java version (you know, what Java was supposed to be
> all about) woul let me run it there anyway.
> 
Does the subjunctive mean you perceive Java has failed to meet its
objective?  Has Java become platform-sensitive, outcome of lawsuits
notwithstanding?

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Jay Maynard
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:03:57AM -0500, Shane Ginnane wrote:
> I tried the (Linux) reader a while back, and it went to hell in a handbasket
> - didn't like the Blackdown JRE I had installed IIRC.

Ah, yes, I'd forgotten there was a Linux version. I brought up a Red Hat
system after discovering that's what it wanted (platform independent? Ha.),
and it did indeed run. That doesn't do me any good, though, and writing
Linux-dependent Java is as wrong-headed as writing Windows-dependent Java.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:52:46 -0500, Jay Maynard wrote:

>> > I'd love a Linux version.
>> Linux for what hardware platform?  z/Series?  Power PC?  SPARC?
>> Other (specify)?  I'd hope portable for all.
>
>Heck, I'd settle for a Java version that wasn't tied to the Windows
>platform, IBM is not about to do anything for Mac OS X specifically, but
>a platform-independent Java version (you know, what Java was supposed to be
>all about) woul let me run it there anyway.

 - Java; "write once, run nowhere".
I tried the (Linux) reader a while back, and it went to hell in a handbasket
- didn't like the Blackdown JRE I had installed IIRC.

Yet another instance to re-enforce my dis-enchantment with the abject
con-job that is Java.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Jay Maynard
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:47:27AM -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> > I'd love a Linux version.
> Linux for what hardware platform?  z/Series?  Power PC?  SPARC?
> Other (specify)?  I'd hope portable for all.

Heck, I'd settle for a Java version that wasn't tied to the Windows
platform, IBM is not about to do anything for Mac OS X specifically, but
a platform-independent Java version (you know, what Java was supposed to be
all about) woul let me run it there anyway.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:

> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:55:28 -0300
> 
> I'd love a Linux version.
> 
Linux for what hardware platform?  z/Series?  Power PC?  SPARC?
Other (specify)?  I'd hope portable for all.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
09/05/2005
   at 01:59 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Is there such a beastie? I would really prefer to have a z/OS based,
>or even Linux based version of this utility.

I'd love a Linux version.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see  
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-06 Thread Dave Cartwright
John,
Have you tried it under WINE? I have not myself worked with WINE, I just
know how to spell it.

Dave



On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:42:58 +1000, Fenner, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>John,
> Always enjoy your posts!
>Have you considered buying VMWare for Linux and running (a licensed copy
>of) Windows under Linux as an application?
>It's attractive because (i) you can run any windows app (ii) and if that
>app insists on an older version of Windows, install that version of
>windows into a VM and bob's your uncle (iii) it is just S-O C-O-O-L
>
>Jim
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-05 Thread Fenner, Jim
John,
Always enjoy your posts!
Have you considered buying VMWare for Linux and running (a licensed copy
of) Windows under Linux as an application?
It's attractive because (i) you can run any windows app (ii) and if that
app insists on an older version of Windows, install that version of
windows into a VM and bob's your uncle (iii) it is just S-O C-O-O-L

Jim




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: 6 Sep 2005 04:59
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

Is there such a beastie? I would really prefer to have a z/OS based, or
even Linux based version of this utility. Is there one? If not, how much
trouble would I be in if I were to try to create one? I am running the
Windows based one on my home system. But it uses my Linux based HTTP
proxy (squid) because I don't let my Windows system out onto the
Internet. I have reviewed my Squid logs and found the host name of the
IBM server as well as the names of the control files. I have looked at
the control files and they are simply text files with more variable
information in them. It is fairly likely that even I could write a
replacement program. Most likely in Perl, but maybe even in Java. Both
Perl and Java are available for both the z/OS and Linux systems (Windows
too, of course). I guess that it will depend on how irritated I get with
Windows again.

If you're wondering why I'm using my home system for this, it is because
my work has a "packet shaper" which reduces my ftp speed to about 4Kb/s
in order to conserve bandwidth for higher priority work.


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



IMPORTANT

 The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and 
may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, 
re-transmission, disclosure dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties.  If you 
have received this e-mail in error please notify the Privacy Hotline of the 
Australian Taxation Office, telephone 13 28 69 and delete all copies of this 
transmission together with any attachments. 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-05 Thread John P Baker
The only version of the IBM Softcopy Librarian now available is for the
Windows platform.

However, I have seen considerable discussion over the last couple of years
in which a desire for a version for Linux has been mentioned.

So far, I have observed no response out of IBM.

John P Baker
Software Engineer

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 14:59
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

Is there such a beastie? I would really prefer to have a z/OS based, or
even Linux based version of this utility. Is there one? If not, how much
trouble would I be in if I were to try to create one? I am running the
Windows based one on my home system. But it uses my Linux based HTTP
proxy (squid) because I don't let my Windows system out onto the
Internet. I have reviewed my Squid logs and found the host name of the
IBM server as well as the names of the control files. I have looked at
the control files and they are simply text files with more variable
information in them. It is fairly likely that even I could write a
replacement program. Most likely in Perl, but maybe even in Java. Both
Perl and Java are available for both the z/OS and Linux systems (Windows
too, of course). I guess that it will depend on how irritated I get with
Windows again.

If you're wondering why I'm using my home system for this, it is because
my work has a "packet shaper" which reduces my ftp speed to about 4Kb/s
in order to conserve bandwidth for higher priority work.


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-05 Thread Mark Blain
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 at 13:59 John McKown wrote (in part), 

> Is there such a beastie? I would really prefer to have a z/OS based, or even 
> Linux based version of this utility. Is there one? If not, how much trouble 
> would I be in if I were to try to create one?

I'm working at a much lower level (Softcopy Reader alone meets my 
needs), but these links may clarify what's available and for which 
platform(s):

"BookManager Family of Products - Family Overview"
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/applications/office/bkmgr/

"Highlights: Library Server replaces BookServers"
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/applications/office/bkmgr/libserver.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Non-Windows version of IBM Softcopy Librarian?

2005-09-05 Thread McKown, John
Is there such a beastie? I would really prefer to have a z/OS based, or
even Linux based version of this utility. Is there one? If not, how much
trouble would I be in if I were to try to create one? I am running the
Windows based one on my home system. But it uses my Linux based HTTP
proxy (squid) because I don't let my Windows system out onto the
Internet. I have reviewed my Squid logs and found the host name of the
IBM server as well as the names of the control files. I have looked at
the control files and they are simply text files with more variable
information in them. It is fairly likely that even I could write a
replacement program. Most likely in Perl, but maybe even in Java. Both
Perl and Java are available for both the z/OS and Linux systems (Windows
too, of course). I guess that it will depend on how irritated I get with
Windows again.

If you're wondering why I'm using my home system for this, it is because
my work has a "packet shaper" which reduces my ftp speed to about 4Kb/s
in order to conserve bandwidth for higher priority work.


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html