Re: Problem with CA-1
Problem # 2 is VOLSEQ=0002 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 The next problem we had was where the job called for a scratch tape, the scratch tape was mounted (see the tape inquiry info below says it's a scratch tape) M00605 VOLSER=M00605 VOLSER=M00605 DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO75FC.CYC8072 EXPDT=2008/093 ACCT=HEXZEROS SMSMC=BLANKSFLAG1=44=(CLO,SCR) HOOKID=FE= FLAG2=40=(OUT) CTLGCNT=000 BATCHID=54=TMSSCR FLAG3=00 FLAG5=00 USERID=TMSUSER FLAG4=00 DSN17=UP.M147FC.CYC8072 LJOB=MEP001CC LDATE=2008/073 LPGM=ADRDSSU LUNIT=057A LTIME=0649 CJOB=MEP001CC CDATE=2008/073 CPGM=ADRDSSU CUNIT=057A CTIME=0446 CSTEP=DUMP1CDDNAME=TAPE01 BLKCNT=00 ROBTY=00 COMPRES=078 LABEL=SL DEN=3590 TRTCH=256TROBID=000 TRERRC=0 RECFM=ULRECL=00 BLKSIZE=00EDMID=BLANKS TWERRC=0 NUMDSNB= 1STDSNB=000 LSTDSNB=000 ACTVOL= PRERRC=0 1STVOL=NEXTVOL= PREVVOL= VOLSEQ=0002 PWERRC=0 COUNT=00209VENDOR=BLANKSBTHDATE=2007/115 VOLPERC=024 TRERRI=0 USECLN=00201 CLNCNT=013 DATECLN=2008/072 FILPERC=002 TWERRI=1 OUTCODE=BLANKS SLOT=000 OUTDATE=ZEROS CPUID=JCC1 PRERRI=0 AUTIME=0427AUCODE=00AUDATE=2008/093 AUFLAG1=00 PWERRI=0 *** SCRATCH TAPE *** INQUIRY COMPLETE Here is the error we got: MO14FC.CYC8093 IEC151I A13-08,IFG0195B,MEP001CO,DUMP1,TAPE16,0570,M00605,MEP001.BACKUP. M102FC.CYC8093 IEF196I TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, IEF196I DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 -MEP001CO DUMP108597276.00.001.7 The error message says: 08The requested file sequence number is less than that of the first file on the SL or AL tape during an open to the start of the file. Probable user error. Check the file sequence number and volume serial numbers. We have verified this was not a user error. For some reason it appears that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a scratch tape. (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in scratch status) Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing this? Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version. Thanks, Mary Mary J. Yukus IT Specialist - Lead Systems Programmer HQ US Military Entrance Processing Command J6/MIT-System Support Branch 2834 Green Bay Road North Chicago, IL 60064-3057 Work: 847-688-3680 x7274 Work Cell: 224-627-6017 DSN: 792-7274 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Problem with CA-1
Since this is a scratch tape, it should ignore this. The old version of CA-1 does. VOLSEQ 1 doesn't exist any longer either since it also was a scratch tape. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Campbell Jay Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with CA-1 Problem # 2 is VOLSEQ=0002 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 The next problem we had was where the job called for a scratch tape, the scratch tape was mounted (see the tape inquiry info below says it's a scratch tape) M00605 VOLSER=M00605 VOLSER=M00605 DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO75FC.CYC8072 EXPDT=2008/093 ACCT=HEXZEROS SMSMC=BLANKSFLAG1=44=(CLO,SCR) HOOKID=FE= FLAG2=40=(OUT) CTLGCNT=000 BATCHID=54=TMSSCR FLAG3=00 FLAG5=00 USERID=TMSUSER FLAG4=00 DSN17=UP.M147FC.CYC8072 LJOB=MEP001CC LDATE=2008/073 LPGM=ADRDSSU LUNIT=057A LTIME=0649 CJOB=MEP001CC CDATE=2008/073 CPGM=ADRDSSU CUNIT=057A CTIME=0446 CSTEP=DUMP1CDDNAME=TAPE01 BLKCNT=00 ROBTY=00 COMPRES=078 LABEL=SL DEN=3590 TRTCH=256TROBID=000 TRERRC=0 RECFM=ULRECL=00 BLKSIZE=00EDMID=BLANKS TWERRC=0 NUMDSNB= 1STDSNB=000 LSTDSNB=000 ACTVOL= PRERRC=0 1STVOL=NEXTVOL= PREVVOL= VOLSEQ=0002 PWERRC=0 COUNT=00209VENDOR=BLANKSBTHDATE=2007/115 VOLPERC=024 TRERRI=0 USECLN=00201 CLNCNT=013 DATECLN=2008/072 FILPERC=002 TWERRI=1 OUTCODE=BLANKS SLOT=000 OUTDATE=ZEROS CPUID=JCC1 PRERRI=0 AUTIME=0427AUCODE=00AUDATE=2008/093 AUFLAG1=00 PWERRI=0 *** SCRATCH TAPE *** INQUIRY COMPLETE Here is the error we got: MO14FC.CYC8093 IEC151I A13-08,IFG0195B,MEP001CO,DUMP1,TAPE16,0570,M00605,MEP001.BACKUP. M102FC.CYC8093 IEF196I TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, IEF196I DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 -MEP001CO DUMP108597276.00.001.7 The error message says: 08The requested file sequence number is less than that of the first file on the SL or AL tape during an open to the start of the file. Probable user error. Check the file sequence number and volume serial numbers. We have verified this was not a user error. For some reason it appears that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a scratch tape. (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in scratch status) Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing this? Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version. Thanks, Mary Mary J. Yukus IT Specialist - Lead Systems Programmer HQ US Military Entrance Processing Command J6/MIT-System Support Branch 2834 Green Bay Road North Chicago, IL 60064-3057 Work: 847-688-3680 x7274 Work Cell: 224-627-6017 DSN: 792-7274 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Re: Problem with CA-1
Thanks Tom, I'll forward this on to my CA-1 person. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with CA-1 - Original Message - From: Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 snip Mary, The first thing I would do is run TMSPTRS at V11 and at V11R5 to see if you have pointer issues. After that, I would work with Russ Witt at CA, and then the O/C/E folks at IBM if necessary, to figure out the problem. If you haven't talked to Russ yet, you should request him. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Problem with CA-1
- Original Message - From: Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 snip Mary, The first thing I would do is run TMSPTRS at V11 and at V11R5 to see if you have pointer issues. After that, I would work with Russ Witt at CA, and then the O/C/E folks at IBM if necessary, to figure out the problem. If you haven't talked to Russ yet, you should request him. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Problem with CA-1
That second issue sounds like an intercept is missing and CA-1 isn't getting control to subvert the VOLSEQ. We have plenty of chains that run over 7,000 dsnbs long created every week, I did nothing for 11.5 to enable that, it should work out of the box. My wag is that there is something wrong when you ipl with the new 11.5, old CA90 running downlevel L052INIT or something. That's just very bizarre behaviour for CA-1. Jeff Williams Operating Systems Support -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM Sent: April 9, 2008 11:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with CA-1 Since this is a scratch tape, it should ignore this. The old version of CA-1 does. VOLSEQ 1 doesn't exist any longer either since it also was a scratch tape. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Campbell Jay Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with CA-1 Problem # 2 is VOLSEQ=0002 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 The next problem we had was where the job called for a scratch tape, the scratch tape was mounted (see the tape inquiry info below says it's a scratch tape) M00605 VOLSER=M00605 VOLSER=M00605 DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO75FC.CYC8072 EXPDT=2008/093 ACCT=HEXZEROS SMSMC=BLANKSFLAG1=44=(CLO,SCR) HOOKID=FE= FLAG2=40=(OUT) CTLGCNT=000 BATCHID=54=TMSSCR FLAG3=00 FLAG5=00 USERID=TMSUSER FLAG4=00 DSN17=UP.M147FC.CYC8072 LJOB=MEP001CC LDATE=2008/073 LPGM=ADRDSSU LUNIT=057A LTIME=0649 CJOB=MEP001CC CDATE=2008/073 CPGM=ADRDSSU CUNIT=057A CTIME=0446 CSTEP=DUMP1CDDNAME=TAPE01 BLKCNT=00 ROBTY=00 COMPRES=078 LABEL=SL DEN=3590 TRTCH=256TROBID=000 TRERRC=0 RECFM=ULRECL=00 BLKSIZE=00EDMID=BLANKS TWERRC=0 NUMDSNB= 1STDSNB=000 LSTDSNB=000 ACTVOL= PRERRC=0 1STVOL=NEXTVOL= PREVVOL= VOLSEQ=0002 PWERRC=0 COUNT=00209VENDOR=BLANKSBTHDATE=2007/115 VOLPERC=024 TRERRI=0 USECLN=00201 CLNCNT=013 DATECLN=2008/072 FILPERC=002 TWERRI=1 OUTCODE=BLANKS SLOT=000 OUTDATE=ZEROS CPUID=JCC1 PRERRI=0 AUTIME=0427AUCODE=00AUDATE=2008/093 AUFLAG1=00 PWERRI=0 *** SCRATCH TAPE *** INQUIRY COMPLETE Here is the error we got: MO14FC.CYC8093 IEC151I A13-08,IFG0195B,MEP001CO,DUMP1,TAPE16,0570,M00605,MEP001.BACKUP. M102FC.CYC8093 IEF196I TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, IEF196I DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 -MEP001CO DUMP108597276.00.001.7 The error message says: 08The requested file sequence number is less than that of the first file on the SL or AL tape during an open to the start of the file. Probable user error. Check the file sequence number and volume serial numbers. We have verified this was not a user error. For some reason it appears that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a scratch tape. (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in scratch status) Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing this? Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version. Thanks, Mary Mary
Re: Problem with CA-1
Did you copy the TMC onto this system for testing? How did you copy it? I have seem weird DSNB chaining problems using TMSCOPY to backup and restore for testing and would use an IEBGENER copy anyday. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM Sent: 09 April 2008 16:04 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Problem with CA-1 Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down. IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818 DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033 -JBACKSM1 SMFD16 00 41255 151K.03.032.7 469K 0 0 0 0 0 -JBACKSM1 B4BOMB IEFPROC FLUSH 0 0.00.00 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17 IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005, DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 -JBACKSM1 SMFD17 08 58 15.00.00 .4 2414 0 0 0 0 0 The next problem we had was where the job called for a scratch tape, the scratch tape was mounted (see the tape inquiry info below says it's a scratch tape) M00605 VOLSER=M00605 VOLSER=M00605 DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO75FC.CYC8072 EXPDT=2008/093 ACCT=HEXZEROS SMSMC=BLANKSFLAG1=44=(CLO,SCR) HOOKID=FE= FLAG2=40=(OUT) CTLGCNT=000 BATCHID=54=TMSSCR FLAG3=00 FLAG5=00 USERID=TMSUSER FLAG4=00 DSN17=UP.M147FC.CYC8072 LJOB=MEP001CC LDATE=2008/073 LPGM=ADRDSSU LUNIT=057A LTIME=0649 CJOB=MEP001CC CDATE=2008/073 CPGM=ADRDSSU CUNIT=057A CTIME=0446 CSTEP=DUMP1CDDNAME=TAPE01 BLKCNT=00 ROBTY=00 COMPRES=078 LABEL=SL DEN=3590 TRTCH=256TROBID=000 TRERRC=0 RECFM=ULRECL=00 BLKSIZE=00EDMID=BLANKS TWERRC=0 NUMDSNB= 1STDSNB=000 LSTDSNB=000 ACTVOL= PRERRC=0 1STVOL=NEXTVOL= PREVVOL= VOLSEQ=0002 PWERRC=0 COUNT=00209VENDOR=BLANKSBTHDATE=2007/115 VOLPERC=024 TRERRI=0 USECLN=00201 CLNCNT=013 DATECLN=2008/072 FILPERC=002 TWERRI=1 OUTCODE=BLANKS SLOT=000 OUTDATE=ZEROS CPUID=JCC1 PRERRI=0 AUTIME=0427AUCODE=00AUDATE=2008/093 AUFLAG1=00 PWERRI=0 *** SCRATCH TAPE *** INQUIRY COMPLETE Here is the error we got: MO14FC.CYC8093 IEC151I A13-08,IFG0195B,MEP001CO,DUMP1,TAPE16,0570,M00605,MEP001.BACKUP. M102FC.CYC8093 IEF196I TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, IEF196I DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001, DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093 -MEP001CO DUMP108597276.00.001.7 The error message says: 08The requested file sequence number is less than that of the first file on the SL or AL tape during an open to the start of the file. Probable user error. Check the file sequence number and volume serial numbers. We have verified this was not a user error. For some reason it appears that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a scratch tape. (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in scratch status) Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing this? Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version. Thanks, Mary Mary J. Yukus IT Specialist - Lead Systems Programmer HQ US Military Entrance Processing Command J6/MIT-System Support Branch 2834 Green Bay Road North Chicago, IL 60064-3057 Work: 847-688-3680 x7274 Work Cell: 224-627-6017 DSN: 792-7274 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.9/1364 - Release Date: 07/04/2008 18:38 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.9/1364 - Release Date: 07/04/2008 18:38 -- For
Re: Problem with CA-1
Mary, I am aware of the first problem (the level-1 tech asked me to look at the issue). She is going to ask for some additional information (for example, you have the SYSPRINT for the DFDSS step that is failing coded as DD DUMMY, and we would like to see if DFDSS is putting out any error messages. I was not aware of the second issue, so please open an issue with CA-1 support. I can tell you that the first question we will ask is to see the joblog and/or JCL for the failing job. My guess is that they have LABEL=2 specified and are trying to stack a dataset onto a scratch tape. Feel free to contact me directly. Russell Witt L2 Support Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Problem with CA-1
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:03:39 -0500, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem. We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5. When we implement the v11.5 we have the following problems. The first is a problem with multiple files on a tape. When it complete the 4th file, we get the following error. The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new version of CA-1. snip We have verified this was not a user error. For some reason it appears that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a scratch tape. (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in scratch status) Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing this? Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version. We performed many 11.0 to 11.5 conversion and some from 5.2 to 11.5 and some from TLMS to CA-1 11.5. Had no problems with any of them. Did all the intercepts apply correctly in TMSINIT? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
