Re: LPAR MOBILITY
In 5540078572993283.wa.wwwdieuyahoo@listserv.ua.edu, on 05/28/2015 at 07:31 AM, IBMZOS 00af65f10fb1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: Sysplex do the job, You can switch to a standby server, but you can't migrate an address space to another LPAR or CEC. Not at all equivalent to what SSI does. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CA-7 question
I was hoping someone was watching the list today that could help me get over the hump on this one. I know there is some pattern, but it's just not clicking. Some jobs seem to jump in several hours early, while other jump in only 30 minutes before their time. Tony Thigpen Lizette Koehler wrote on 05/31/2015 04:06 PM: I might recommend that, if you have not done so, join the CA Community for CA7. Or open a case with CA. You may get a much faster response. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CA-7 question I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: GENERATED STATEMENT!?
In 2133628351749565.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 05/27/2015 at 11:37 AM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: Where does 41 //SYSIN DD * GENERATED STATEMENT come from? It used to come from the R/I, but in MVS I'm not sure if it's C/I or JES[2|3]. What does it mean? What it's always meant. (I had no stray data cards.) Are you a betting man? 1. Reproduce the problem with a program that echoes SYSIN 2. Post the input here 3. Look at SYSIN form SDSF. 4. Check whether C/I or JES a. Handles SYSIN b. Expands symbols. The most likely explanation is that JES handles SYSIN before the symbols are substituted. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: LPAR MOBILITY
In 0912959236903597.wa.wwwdieuyahoo@listserv.ua.edu, on 05/28/2015 at 04:22 AM, IBMZOS 00af65f10fb1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: thought Z was at the top of technology. Z is missing things that IBM developeds on S/360 and S/370. The cobbler's son is barefoot. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
Right, but this wasn't IBM, and was color (3279). Clearly a 3290 competitor. On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Linda linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote: We had several of these. IBM 3290. Ours were coax attached to a couple of IBM 3174 Controllers. Black background, orange character set. Linda Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2015, at 5:27 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote: OK, this is sorta OT, but related: in the late 1990s I had the pleasure of working for a while at a customer site. Some of the time I used a coax-connected device with a large (for the time) screen that could either support four 3279 sessions at once, or one 3279 session that took the whole screen (you could switch modes; in single-session mode, you'd then cycle through the sessions). The single-session mode was great late at night when very tired. Anyone remember this device? It wasn't IBM. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote: Probably the last time they sold one. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices revision date 12/26/2003 ??? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices http://www.c-reset.com/terminal.html#IBM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OMVS command history
In ofe59387ae.7af02a11-on85257e50.003600b4-80257e50.00368...@prudential.com, on 05/25/2015 at 10:55 AM, Ken MacKenzie ken.macken...@pramerica.ie said: My question, then, is why is my command history kept if I can't use it? Your question has an assumption contrary to fact. In fact, you *can* use it. See the history command. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: GENERATED STATEMENT!?
In sn1pr0101mb1520380b4bfbb7548b340e29ce...@sn1pr0101mb1520.prod.exchangelabs.com, on 05/27/2015 at 04:54 PM, J O Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com said: //SYMS2 DD *IFSYM,SYMBOLS=(EXECSYS,LOGDD2) There is no space between asterisk and ampersand. Could that be right? That depends on whether the JES expands the symbols or only the Converter does. If the first, it looks not only right but necessary. If the second, BAD. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Notify for XMIT
In 555fe63d.3010...@acm.org, on 05/22/2015 at 09:30 PM, Joel Ewing jcew...@acm.org said: But from APPENDIX A in TSO/E Customization, any command invoked directly from the TMP that returns a non-0 return code causes the TMP to end. If true, then 10.2 Writing error routines in the CLIST manual is in error, Has anybody tried ERROR + DO WRITE SEND retu7rned cc LASTCC RETURN END SEND 'message' USER(FOO) NOW where the SEND gets a nonzero RC? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: List of all on-line volumes
In 55673d3b.2020...@vse2pdf.com, on 05/28/2015 at 12:07 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com said: Is there simple batch method to get a list of all on-line dasd volumes without actually coding the volumes in the JCL? There are several tools available from batch TSO, assuming authorization. Are you permitted to use CONSOLE? Also lots of CBTTAPE teeols, e.g., PDG86. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
In 0bf72eb9d750401a98a23caab0737...@exmbxprd01.ad.ufl.edu, on 05/28/2015 at 07:57 PM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu said: The ++PROGRAM MCS describes a program element (a pre-built load module or a program object). It must immediately precede the load module or program object when they are within the SYSMOD. That would be a good trick. I might believe a GIMZIP compressed version. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)
In 0a0e01d0994a$e99c0410$bcd40c30$@mcn.org, on 05/28/2015 at 06:33 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said: Well, I moved ISAUTH() unchanged to its own assembler module. No change in the error. I removed the IEABRCX DEFINE and bingo! It works. My guess is that it doesn't recognize the eye catcher unless there's a B in front of it. Personally, I consider IEABRCX DEFINE to be a ticking time bomb and would only use it under duress. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: New Line vs. Line Feed
In 5567e81c.4040...@vse2pdf.com, on 05/29/2015 at 12:16 AM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com said: 1960's ATT pushes for a replacement of ITA2 which the ATA published as ASCII in 1963. I might believe ASA, through several iterations. I hate overloaded code points! -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Check out Argecy: Thin Clients, Terminals, and Displays - Insync - IN 3483
_Argecy: Thin Clients, Terminals, and Displays - Insync - IN 3483_ (http://www.argecy.com/index.php?pfile=IN3483) Maybe baby! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Where can a running TSO program get its terminal name
In 03d701d09566$b22a3de0$167eb9a0$@mcn.org, on 05/23/2015 at 07:42 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said: @Shmuel, MVS Assembler Services Guide says In what context and section? Is the reference to the AMODE24 flag in the load module or to the actual addressing mode? The AMODE24 pseudo-op implies RMODEANY, but dynamically setting the PSW to 24-bit mode does not. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AW: Re: OMVS command history
In ez-1136710568.1293527...@gmx.ch, on 05/25/2015 at 09:27 PM, Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch said: but OMVS has no access to this file. What about the history command? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Did I really need a CLIST???
In 20150524072331.5312595.17320.38...@yahoo.ca, on 05/24/2015 at 03:23 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said: Real programmers don't document code ITYM real hackers don't document code. Real men aren't afraid to do something just because some idiotic book presents a stereotype as mandatory. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Where can a running TSO program get its terminal name
In 03fa01d09573$5a824990$0f86dcb0$@mcn.org, on 05/23/2015 at 09:13 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said: Sorry to belabor this thread but for the sake of future Googlers felt I needed to say that a global IEABRCX DEFINE is probably a necessary part of this solution. Not if you use MF=. IEABRCX DEFINE might cause collatral damage, but it's not my dog. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Price of OSA Express card
What is the price of OSA Express5S 1000BaseT (copper) ? FC 0417 AFAIK. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku. This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive. mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2015 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.840.228 złotych. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices (3290 Orange Screen!)
I loved the 3290, it was the best ever device to design a nicely readable report when configured in Cinemascope. Wish I could emulate it on my large monitor. Always wishing to push a limit I once split my 3290 into 4 screens, each having a blinking Omegamon screen running. I could hear the little gas gizmos complaining. On 5/30/2015 9:57 PM, Linda wrote: We had several of these. IBM 3290. Ours were coax attached to a couple of IBM 3174 Controllers. Black background, orange character set. Linda Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2015, at 5:27 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote: OK, this is sorta OT, but related: in the late 1990s I had the pleasure of working for a while at a customer site. Some of the time I used a coax-connected device with a large (for the time) screen that could either support four 3279 sessions at once, or one 3279 session that took the whole screen (you could switch modes; in single-session mode, you'd then cycle through the sessions). The single-session mode was great late at night when very tired. Anyone remember this device? It wasn't IBM. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote: Probably the last time they sold one. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices revision date 12/26/2003 ??? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices http://www.c-reset.com/terminal.html#IBM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
No, I had a 3279 SG3 on my desk. It was also 4 session, but could have only one session in the foreground at a time. The 3290 could display all four sessions on screen at the same time. There was a RPQ for the controller to support it. All were IBM branded. Linda Sent from my iPhone On May 31, 2015, at 10:54 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote: Right, but this wasn't IBM, and was color (3279). Clearly a 3290 competitor. On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Linda linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote: We had several of these. IBM 3290. Ours were coax attached to a couple of IBM 3174 Controllers. Black background, orange character set. Linda Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2015, at 5:27 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote: OK, this is sorta OT, but related: in the late 1990s I had the pleasure of working for a while at a customer site. Some of the time I used a coax-connected device with a large (for the time) screen that could either support four 3279 sessions at once, or one 3279 session that took the whole screen (you could switch modes; in single-session mode, you'd then cycle through the sessions). The single-session mode was great late at night when very tired. Anyone remember this device? It wasn't IBM. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote: Probably the last time they sold one. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices revision date 12/26/2003 ??? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices http://www.c-reset.com/terminal.html#IBM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
Some just like to argue. ISPF has had SPLIT since the beginning and if it was on a 3290 device SPLITV. Typically multiple sessions(VTAM) would be a mix of ISPF/CICS/OMEGAMON/BETA42 or RMF. In a message dated 5/31/2015 10:15:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, charl...@mcn.org writes: One could argue both ISPF and the 3290 support split screen. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CA-7 question
Hi Tony, I could see span value is *SPAN = 120 and INCREMENT = 60 from sscan* ; Span=120 is 2 hrs yearly, (span value must be less than increment) SPAN=- CHANGES NUMBER OF HOURS SCHEDULE SCAN IS TO LOOK FORWARD, DURING EACH WAKE-UP, FOR JOBS THAT MUST BE ADDED TO THE QUEUES. VALUE MUST BE A NUMBER OF HOURS FROM 1 TO 24. SPAN VALUE MUST NOT BE LESS THAN THE INCR VALUE. Hope now you understood yearly showing of job now Regards, Rajesh On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote: I was hoping someone was watching the list today that could help me get over the hump on this one. I know there is some pattern, but it's just not clicking. Some jobs seem to jump in several hours early, while other jump in only 30 minutes before their time. Tony Thigpen Lizette Koehler wrote on 05/31/2015 04:06 PM: I might recommend that, if you have not done so, join the CA Community for CA7. Or open a case with CA. You may get a much faster response. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CA-7 question I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
It's really TSO that does not, no? If I could just sign onto TSO multiple times then my desktop with its two 24 monitors would give me all the multiple sessions I could use. And I suppose one could argue semantics here. One could argue both ISPF and the 3290 support split screen. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 8:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices On 2015-05-30, at 18:36, J O Skip Robinson wrote: Sounds a lot like 3290, which was very much an IBM device. Had a large gas panel display with orange on black. (Netflix anyone?) Configurable in various ways as you describe. . An example of how IBM hardware design outpaces its software design. A couple decades after an IBM terminal supported multiple sessions, ISPF doesn't support a user's having multiple sessions. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
CA-7 question
I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: New Line vs. Line Feed
In 838271083.1045039.1432870193420.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com, on 05/29/2015 at 03:29 AM, Ze'ev Atlas 004b34e7c98a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: Does anybody know why do we need two characters that seem to do the same thing No, especially since they *don't* do the same thing. A better question would be why Eunix hijacked the Line Feed instead us using CRLF. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: New Line vs. Line Feed
In 8215077812992901.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 05/29/2015 at 12:27 AM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: Using a device-specific hardware command to separate records in a general file makes as little sense as Assembler H's use of machine carriage control. Or as Eunix using LF as a record separator. A device-neutral convention might have beem Record Separator, ASCII 0x1e. Please inform Ken Thomson. IBM clearly violates a standard. That's not at all clear. What do POSIX et all formally say about the use of LF-broken ASCII? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: SMPE MCS construction question re aliases
In 2008381733857340.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 05/28/2015 at 04:10 PM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: If it's a real mainframe program, it's delivered in individual ++MOD elements and linked at customer's site with ++JCLIN. Or individual ++SRC elements. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Notify for XMIT
On 05/31/2015 09:32 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In 555fe63d.3010...@acm.org, on 05/22/2015 at 09:30 PM, Joel Ewing jcew...@acm.org said: But from APPENDIX A in TSO/E Customization, any command invoked directly from the TMP that returns a non-0 return code causes the TMP to end. If true, then 10.2 Writing error routines in the CLIST manual is in error, Has anybody tried ERROR + DO WRITE SEND retu7rned cc LASTCC RETURN END SEND 'message' USER(FOO) NOW where the SEND gets a nonzero RC? The above CLIST code should presumably work as you expect for intercepting SEND CLIST errors in an Interactive TSO/E, ISPF environment where TSO is invoked via a TSO logon PROC as IKJEFT01 and not as IKJEFT1A or IKJEFT1B. I think the usage of IKJEFT1A/IKJEFT1B is only possible (certainly only reasonable) in batch TSO, and this was the context for our discussion with IBM. The TSO/E CLISTS manual appears to be written from the standpoint of an Interactive TSO environment where there is an associated terminal user, which admittedly is the more common environment for CLIST usage and the environment that has the fullest capability. If you look at the referenced TSO/E/Customization Appendix A, you will find that it explicitly deals with executing the TSO TMP in background -- i.e. Batch TSO, not interactie TSO. The rules for batch TSO are peculiar to that environment -- as obviously you can't expect to do things from a CLIST in batch TSO that require dynamic decisions by an interactive user. The CLIST manual is not in error, just perhaps incomplete in not explicitly mentioning all limitations when running in a batch TSO environment or under IKJEFT1A or IKJEFT1B One could however rationalize that Since this is not really a limitation of CLISTs but of a specific TSO/E environment in which it runs, that it makes more sense for the TSO/E Customization manual and TSO/E User's Manual to lay out this and other Batch-TSO limitations (which they do) since they are the manuals that describe how to run TSO in batch, and I suspect they are also the only manuals that discuss how to use the IKJEFT1A and IKJEFT1B TSO/E entry points. I cannot recall years later the historical reason why we started using IKJEFT1A/IKJEFT1B for Batch TSO rather than IKJEFT01, only that at the time it seemed like the logical thing to do. It didn't bite us until years later when we migrated to TSO user log files for terminal messages because of our usage of SEND under a ClIST under batch TSO under IKJEFJ1A. From our experience, I'm certain The CLIST ERROR handling code in the above example would never be reached if the CLIST were directly executed under IKJEFT1A in batch TSO. -- Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CA-7 question
I might recommend that, if you have not done so, join the CA Community for CA7. Or open a case with CA. You may get a much faster response. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CA-7 question I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: QUESTION ABOUT SPACE ABEND
In ofa502b2ad.1606c58d-onc1257e54.00463b1c-c1257e54.0046a...@se.ibm.com, on 05/29/2015 at 02:51 PM, Steve Coalbran coal...@se.ibm.com said: What happened to the X37 exit. As I recall, it was added for the ASB Reader, which did not carry over to AOS (OS/VS). The exit might still be there, but I doubt that it is supported. I thought it had been incorporated into JES2. That would have been bizarre. Perhaps you're confusing the exit with the ASB Reader, which is not needed if you are running ASP, HASP or JES[123] -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CA-7 question
if jobs are demand , you can see entry mode of job isDEMD .. not REQ ; Also if job is demand to ca7 it will not waiting for time or date request , it will immediately start running. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Lucas Rosalen rosalen.lu...@gmail.com wrote: Are you sure the other jobs are being added by SSCN? Maybe they have/had been demanded? Lucas On May 31, 2015 11:19 PM, Rajesh Kumar herowith.z...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tony, I could see span value is *SPAN = 120 and INCREMENT = 60 from sscan* ; Span=120 is 2 hrs yearly, (span value must be less than increment) SPAN=- CHANGES NUMBER OF HOURS SCHEDULE SCAN IS TO LOOK FORWARD, DURING EACH WAKE-UP, FOR JOBS THAT MUST BE ADDED TO THE QUEUES. VALUE MUST BE A NUMBER OF HOURS FROM 1 TO 24. SPAN VALUE MUST NOT BE LESS THAN THE INCR VALUE. Hope now you understood yearly showing of job now Regards, Rajesh On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote: I was hoping someone was watching the list today that could help me get over the hump on this one. I know there is some pattern, but it's just not clicking. Some jobs seem to jump in several hours early, while other jump in only 30 minutes before their time. Tony Thigpen Lizette Koehler wrote on 05/31/2015 04:06 PM: I might recommend that, if you have not done so, join the CA Community for CA7. Or open a case with CA. You may get a much faster response. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU ] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CA-7 question I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: List of all on-line volumes
MXI is another option. On 31 May 2015 at 14:19, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In 55673d3b.2020...@vse2pdf.com, on 05/28/2015 at 12:07 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com said: Is there simple batch method to get a list of all on-line dasd volumes without actually coding the volumes in the JCL? There are several tools available from batch TSO, assuming authorization. Are you permitted to use CONSOLE? Also lots of CBTTAPE teeols, e.g., PDG86. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CA-7 question
Are you sure the other jobs are being added by SSCN? Maybe they have/had been demanded? Lucas On May 31, 2015 11:19 PM, Rajesh Kumar herowith.z...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tony, I could see span value is *SPAN = 120 and INCREMENT = 60 from sscan* ; Span=120 is 2 hrs yearly, (span value must be less than increment) SPAN=- CHANGES NUMBER OF HOURS SCHEDULE SCAN IS TO LOOK FORWARD, DURING EACH WAKE-UP, FOR JOBS THAT MUST BE ADDED TO THE QUEUES. VALUE MUST BE A NUMBER OF HOURS FROM 1 TO 24. SPAN VALUE MUST NOT BE LESS THAN THE INCR VALUE. Hope now you understood yearly showing of job now Regards, Rajesh On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote: I was hoping someone was watching the list today that could help me get over the hump on this one. I know there is some pattern, but it's just not clicking. Some jobs seem to jump in several hours early, while other jump in only 30 minutes before their time. Tony Thigpen Lizette Koehler wrote on 05/31/2015 04:06 PM: I might recommend that, if you have not done so, join the CA Community for CA7. Or open a case with CA. You may get a much faster response. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CA-7 question I am trying to better understand why jobs show up in the REQ when the show up. For example, I have a job with the following: ID=003 ROLL=D INDEX=+000 SCAL=DOTM=1640 LEADTM=0010 SUBTM=1630 STARTM=1630 WEEKLYDAY=SUN And it already in the queue two hours early: LQ,SEQ=JOB XXX REQ 0823 151/1630 151/1630 151/1640 ALL- 003 SSCN 001 SLIF-00 REQUEST COMPLETED AT 14:44:59 ON 15.151 Yet, other jobs don't seem to appear until almost the time they need to run. I think it has to do with the SSCAN values, but nothing seems to be making sense at this point: SSCAN CURRENT SCHEDULE SCAN VALUES SPAN = 120 INCREMENT = 60 QUEUE DWELL = 30 SKELETON RETRY = 0 REPROMPT= 10 LEAD TIME = 0 STATUS: REQQ IS ACTIVE ABR MSGS = NO RDYQ IS ACTIVE HOLD JOBS = NO NEXT SCAN WAKE-UP = 15151 AT 1517 NEXT SCAN PERIOD START TIME = 15151 AT 1647 -- Tony Thigpen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
On 5/31/2015 11:05 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On 2015-05-30, at 18:36, J O Skip Robinson wrote: Sounds a lot like 3290, which was very much an IBM device. Had a large gas panel display with orange on black. (Netflix anyone?) Configurable in various ways as you describe. . An example of how IBM hardware design outpaces its software design. A couple decades after an IBM terminal supported multiple sessions, ISPF doesn't support a user's having multiple sessions. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Incorrect. ISPF supports multiple user sessions as of z/OS V2R1. However, the only 'sploiter Luthy, is z/OSMF. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AW: Re: AW: Re: OMVS command history
but OMVS has no access to this file. What about the history command? Well, as I wrote, the OMVS command processor has no access to the .sh_history file (because it has not been programmed that way). You can of course use the histroy shell command. But this is not related to what the OP asked about. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
On 2015-05-30, at 18:36, J O Skip Robinson wrote: Sounds a lot like 3290, which was very much an IBM device. Had a large gas panel display with orange on black. (Netflix anyone?) Configurable in various ways as you describe. . An example of how IBM hardware design outpaces its software design. A couple decades after an IBM terminal supported multiple sessions, ISPF doesn't support a user's having multiple sessions. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Where can a running TSO program get its terminal name
The master of the out-of-context quote. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 7:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where can a running TSO program get its terminal name In 03fa01d09573$5a824990$0f86dcb0$@mcn.org, on 05/23/2015 at 09:13 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said: Sorry to belabor this thread but for the sake of future Googlers felt I needed to say that a global IEABRCX DEFINE is probably a necessary part of this solution. Not if you use MF=. IEABRCX DEFINE might cause collatral damage, but it's not my dog. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AW: Re: JES2 Exit 23
Long time ago (MVS/ESA 3.x in the late 80ies), I wrote JES2 and PSF exits to provide (part of) the accounting information as well as some other stuff to PSF. It was a combination of JES Exits 3 and 23, as well as PSF exits 1 and 2. At that time, I did not want to take the burden to extend any JES2 control blokc held on the spool, and since it was sufficient, I used some user fields in the JCT so save acoounting information in JES2 exit 3. Later, JES2 exit 23 aquired some storage (getmain) to store this data for PSF exits 1 and 2. PSF exit 2 (job end) was in charge of releasing the storage after use. This is from a quick refresh of my memory. Note also that I have not verified if there is an easier way nowadays. I'll send you some code snippets offlist. -- Peter Hunkeler Von: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Betreff: Re: JES2 Exit 23 Datum: 31.05.15 07:49 I have not found any definitive info on how to extract the Accounting information on a JOB producing output and getting it to the APSUX01/APSUX01P exit. You might want to contact IBM directly via an SR for assistance. What version of PSF are you running? Are you using Assembler or C Language? Have you looked at the IEFJESCT to see what is available in the JES2 Communications Area? Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 5:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JES2 Exit 23 If you are not aware, there is also a JES2 List that might be helpful as well. IBMMAIN or JES2 will be good. To join JES2 - use this URL JES2 http://listserv.vt.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=jes2-l Have you looked at the JES2 EXITS manual? SA22-7534-13 z/OS JES2 Installation Exits Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- m...@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Markus Haselbach Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 12:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JES2 Exit 23 Hallo, I?m for the first time involved with JES2 exits. The issue is printing with PSF. I have to write accounting information from the Job Card on the Job Header Page. This will be done in PSF Header Exit APSUX01. The question is how to get the information there. I would like to pass the accounting field by putting it in the JSPA in JES2 Exit 23 HASX23A. Can somebody give me a hint, how to get the Jobcard in HASX23A, or an other solution? Best regards Markus Haselbach Credit-Suisse AG -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Question on 3270 Devices
We had a couple of these for operators. It was a box like the INFO windows that a large screen TV. Four DFT sessions. No micro code at controller. Don't remember if it was DATA21 or Barr. In a message dated 5/30/2015 9:57:22 P.M. Central Daylight Time, linda.lst...@comcast.net writes: Anyone remember this device? It wasn't IBM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
