[SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use

2016-03-12 Thread Walter Marguccio
3278-5 is my favourite. 
Valter Marguccio 

Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Apply PTF on DB2 10 (z/os 1.12)

2016-02-28 Thread Walter Marguccio
Mehrshad,
you can use the EXCLUDE parameter on the APPLY command if you don't wantto 
apply one or more PTFs. The syntax is easy: EXCLUDE(ptf1 ptf2 ptf3).Could you 
post the SMP/E statements you used for your last APPLY run ? Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Apply PTF on DB2 10 (z/os 1.12)

2016-02-24 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello Manshadi, 
it has nothing to do with your query, however ... why would you want to bypass 
HOLDERR during APPLY ?Are there other people on this list who would recommend 
this practice ? Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DASD device not going offline

2016-02-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello,
you asked who is allocating device 376B, and z/OS repliesthat OMVS is 
allocating device 376E, which is another device.Or am I reading wrong ? Walter 
Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Which CP is used when ...

2016-02-20 Thread Walter Marguccio
Ladies and gentlemen, 
as always, thanks for your replies.
Walter Marguccio 

Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Which CP is used when ...

2016-02-19 Thread Walter Marguccio
we have old OSA-Express-3 cards, 1Gbps. We use WLM SC for both batch and ftp, 
the latter has higher importance (3) compared to batch.So far I haven't run any 
trace.
> Check your transfer rates shown in EZA1617I messages. Are they varying 
>wildly, even within a batch job? 
this is what my co-workers tell me, that the performance of the file transfer 
varies wildy.. They assumethis depends on how much the LPAR is busy, in terms 
of CPU.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Which CP is used when ...

2016-02-19 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello Peter,.> I this what you've been asking for? .well, let's say your reply 
helps me to understand better which processor (either the CP or the SAP, in 
this case)is involved when a dataset is transmitted from z/OS to another box. I 
understand that both CP and SAP are involved..Which might mean that if my zBC 
12 is, say, 80% CPU busy, a given outbound trasmission will be slower 
comparedto the same transmission which takes place when the zBC 12 is only 20% 
CPU busy. .What my co-workers wants to know is whether an outbound ftp 
transmission on a zBC 12 can be assigned to a processorwhich works a full 
speed, or , viceversa, the performance of the transmission is affected by how 
busy the CP and/or the SAP is/are..
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany.P.S. Please, apologize if the formatting of my post makes the 
reading confusing.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Which CP is used when ...

2016-02-19 Thread Walter Marguccio
 ... I use ftp to transfer a dataset from z/OS to a distributed maschine ?
The CP ? The SAP (the I/O processor) ?
 Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DFSORT (old) enhancement

2015-09-15 Thread Walter Marguccio
David,
thanks very much for your clarifications. Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DFSORT (old) enhancement

2015-09-14 Thread Walter Marguccio
Ciao Massimo,
I read that excerpt, too, which however refers to unknown file size as 
input.I'd like to know the amount of primary and secondary space of 
dynamicallyallocated SORTWKxx when the input file size is known. 
Which lead me to another query ... 1) I know my programmers specify often FILSZ 
on the PARM2) we have DFSMSrmm3) I'm pretty sure BLOCKSET technique is always 
selected for a SORT operation
Can I assume from the above that DFSORT is always able to determine an accurate 
file size ? Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DFSORT (old) enhancement

2015-09-14 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello,
is there a default value for the primary space allocation for dynamically 
allocated SORTWKxx when the file size is known ? Or does DFSORT adjust this 
value depending on the input file size ?
TIA Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zFS high number of real frames

2015-07-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
Lizette,may I ask you which level is your zFS at?And how much CS does your LPAR 
have assigned? Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zFS high number of real frames

2015-07-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello Lizette,all values you mentioned use their default value. I 
have:user_cache_size set to 1229Mvnode_cache_size set to 32768 (I assume byte) 
meta_cache_size set to 100Mmetaback_cache_size set to 1129M
Our LPAR has 12800M real storage assigned. According to IBM,above default 
values but the 2nd are dependent from the amount of RSin the system .
 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zFS high number of real frames

2015-07-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello list,
has anyone noticed a higher number of real frames usage in the zFS address 
space on z/OS 2.1 compared to z/OS 1.13? I already opened a PMR with IBM, but 
wanted to ask for any feedbacks/gotchas.                                       
Kind regards,                                                    Walter 
Marguccio 

Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Intermittent, not consistently reproducible problems with PDSEs on z/OS V2R1 (incl. infrequent S0F4-20 RSN 1C0752EE ABENDs)

2015-03-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello Karl,
you are welcome; you said the problem is intermittent. Running only once on my 
z/OS 2.1 doesn't necessarily mean that it will run correctly the next 100 
times. I ran the job a second time in order to call IEBGENER, rather than 
ICEGENER.Still, I get a 'clean'  in both datasets. 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Intermittent, not consistently reproducible problems with PDSEs on z/OS V2R1 (incl. infrequent S0F4-20 RSN 1C0752EE ABENDs)

2015-03-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello Karl,
I did ran your job, without changing a comma, on one of our z/OS 2.1 
systems.Member  is identical on both PDSEs.
 Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SMPE CSI issue

2015-02-27 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello,
I would think the duplicated record is the GIMZPOOL record you copied in step 
2).
The SMP/E manuals describe a procedure to reorganize CSIs, have a look here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.gim3000/dsscmp.htm

Give it a try .

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zFS and VVDS

2014-09-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
Jürgen,

which z/OS release are you working on?

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


z/OS V2.1 and System Symobls and JCL

2014-07-30 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello again,

Peter's sample would work coding:

//H2PC EXEC PGM=FTP,PARM='(EXIT'
//MYFILE   DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MY.DATASET

//OUTPUT   DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN    DD *,SYMBOLS=EXECSYS
mypc
mypw

put DD://MYFILE test.file.&LYYMMDD..&LHHMMSS..txt

no EXPORT, no SET.


The z/OS 2.1 Initialization and Tuning Reference claims &DATE, &LDATE,
&TIME and <IME as old sysmbols. Maybe this is the reason why they do not
get resolved when used in the JCL above.

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


z/OS V2.1 and System Symobls and JCL

2014-07-30 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello there,

I find the last sample provided by Peter very effective, because it does not 
involve
any programs and use pure, sole JCL. However, I don't understand why you need 
to EXPORT
and SET the variables first. Let me explain. On a z/OS 2.1 this works:

//H2PC EXEC PGM=FTP,PARM='(EXIT'    
//OUTPUT   DD SYSOUT=*  
//SYSIN    DD *,SYMBOLS=EXECSYS  
  mypc 
  mypw
  put MY.DSNAME myfile_&sysname..txt  


Symbol &sysname is resolved, no need to code EXPORT or SET in JCL.
The same work for another variable like &jday. But the same does NOT work if I 
code

put MY.DSNAME myfile_&ldate..<ime..txt  
Both &ldate and <ime do not get resolved.

Grateful if someone can explain why.
 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF / GRS

2013-06-25 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Mark Brooks 
> Subject: Re: XCF / GRS

> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp0158.pdf 

Mark,

thanks for the link to the Redpaper and the summary of the steps involved 
in the migration.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: XCF / GRS

2013-06-24 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Roger Steyn 
> Subject: Re: XCF / GRS

> That's a nice article . Thanks Chris !


>> the GRS team wrote a Hot Topics Article that outlines the changes made 

>> to GRS and contains a tested procedure for migrating to FICON. Please take a 
>> look.

>>  http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/hot_topics.html
 
the article deals with configurations with GRS-managed CTC devices. 
Is there any guide, Redpaper, doc for rings with devices managed by XCF, 
which, too, need to migrate to Ficon ?

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Ported Tools - Unix

2013-06-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Jake anderson 
> Subject: Ported Tools - Unix

> Any idea or suggestion on why this PTF is included ? Is it licensed or a
> priced feature that we need to purchase seperately ?
 
AFAIK the Ported Tools are now distribued by Rocket Software:

http://www.rocketsoftware.com/portedtools

and have been rebranded. I can't tell you whether the PTF you claim is in the 
package,
but I'd try to download the tools from then following the above link.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: To view Brodcast notification message

2013-06-13 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Jake anderson 
> Subject: To view Brodcast notification message

> Is there a possibility to view the missed Notification messages ?


If you have access to the LPAR's hardcopy log (SYSLOG or OPERLOG), you must 

find one or more lines like this:

13164 07:06:08.35 INTERNAL 0290  SE 'hh.mm.ss JOB0n $HASP165 JOB12345 
ENDED AT nodename  MAXCC=0004',LOGON,
   USER=(your_userid)   
         


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO

2013-05-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Horst Sinram 
> Subject: Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO


> "Mananage to Both" is intended to combine the region management of the TORs 

> (allowing to favor the TORs over the AORs)


Horst,

we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together.
Would you suggest managing the region using goal of "transaction" or "both" ?

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO

2013-05-22 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: "Barkow, Eileen" 

> Subject: why does WLM  Server status change from YES to NO


> Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?


Eileen,

very interesting query. I noticed myself this behaviour two weeks ago when I 
changed my OLTP

region from "manage region using goal of REGION" to "manage region using goal 
of TRANSACTION".

If I understood what the FM say, with the latter WLM does take into account the 
OLTP's transaction response
time when managing the region. Using the former, WLM does not consider OLTP's 
transaction response time.
Ever since, the OLTP's SERVER field in SDSF keeps changing from NO to YES and 
viceversa.

Maybe someone with more expericence can explain why.

I wonder what the SDSF SERVER field shows if "manage region using goal of  
BOTH" is set.



Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DFHSM QUESTION - RECALLING DSN TO ITS ORIGINAL VOLUME

2013-03-21 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: willie bunter 
 
> I checked the SC.  It doesn't have Guaranteed Space.

Willie,
 
if the SC doesn't have Guaranteed Space, then there is no way to force hsm to
recall a migrated dataset on the original volume (at least that I'm aware of). 
If your dataset would have had a SC with Guaranteed Space = Yes, then hsm would 
have recalled it on the same volume where it was allocated. And if the original 
volume 
is not there (for whatever reason) the recall would fail. 
 
If you have datasets with such a SC, you can test this yourself.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DFHSM QUESTION - RECALLING DSN TO ITS ORIGINAL VOLUME

2013-03-21 Thread Walter Marguccio
From: willie bunter 

> how can I force HSM to recall the dsn to the original volume?  


IIRC, if the datasets belongs to a SC whose Guaranteed Space = Yes, then hsm 
recalls
the dataset on the same volume where the dataset originally was. 


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Use of FCWITHDRAW with EMC Dasd

2012-11-28 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Lizette Koehler 
> Subject: Use of FCWITHDRAW with EMC Dasd

> ADR287I (001)-DDTFP(01), FCWITHDRAW WAS ISSUED FOR VOLUME XX
> ON UNIT A051 BECAUSE THE VOLUME WAS NOT INITIALIZED, RETURN CODE 1 

> And I am not sure if this is an issue. 

From the dss manual:

"FCWITHDRAW specifies that if the volume that is dumped is the target volume of
a FlashCopy relationship, the relationship is withdrawn when the dump has
successfully completed"

Is your source volume the target volume of a FC relationship ? If not, then the 
keyword
here would make no sense, would it ?

Explanation for ADR287I claims that 

"Following a successful DUMP operation, DFSMSdss attempted to 
invoke ICKDSF to initialize the source volume of the DUMP operation    
because the FCWITHDRAW keyword was specified."

If your goal is to obtain a successfull DUMP of the volume, you've got one.
In this case I wouldn't see the rc=1 as an issue.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: New DFSMSrmm retention method

2012-10-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Mike Wood 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 


> I am sceptical about using RETPD(93000) as a default retention for all new 
> tape data sets. 

> But, if that works for you . . . . .


Well, we have been keeping cataloged datasets on DASD forever (NOLIMIT in MC).

Therefore, I'd use the same principle for cataloged datasets on tape.
Whether that is questionable, I agree. 


> I hope that helps you, 


it does, thanks a bunch!

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: New DFSMSrmm retention method

2012-10-23 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Mike Wood 

> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

> So, if still cataloged, and the VRS specifies WHILECATALOG, 
> a data set will be retained regardless of the EXPDT/RETPD.

Mike,

I understand that, for cataloged datasets, the WHILECATALOG keyword, specified
in a single VRS or in a VRS chain, always wins. Am I correct ?

Ever since we migrated to rmm, we have: 

a) RETPD(5) in EDGPRMxx and 
b) one VRS defined as: dsname('**') WHILECATALOG LOCATION(HOME)

with this setup, a cataloged dataset with a given RETPD/EXPDT will never be 
deleted.

If I want RETPD/EXPDT to be honored for a dataset, and want to stick to VRSEL 
retention method, I suppose I need to change:

a) RETPD in EDGPRMxx from 5 to 93000 (keep the data almost forever)
b) update my only VRS as: dsname('**') UNTILEXPIRED LOCATION(HOME)

Or, I change the global retention method from VRSEL to EXPDT, and still need to 
change

a) RETPD in EDGPRMxx from 5 to 93000 

Are my assumptions correct ?

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


New DFSMSrmm retention method

2012-10-22 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello all,

ever since we migrated from CA-1 to rmm in 2008, I have been told that
the latter would never delete a cataloged dataset, even if the dataset
had a RETPD or EXPDT specified at allocation time. In other words, the 

VRSEL retention method would never allow the above, no matter which
combination of VRS(es) was used.


Has the new EXPDT retention method (introduced at z/OS 1.13 level) been 

implemented in order to satisfy such requirement ?  

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-10 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: "Knutson, Sam" 

> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

> If you want to put some time into updating your SMF recording consider whether
> you might get more bang for your buck migrating to Logger rather than 
> reallocating all your MANx data sets.

Sam,

thanks, this is a very interesting food-for thoughts post, I didn't consider 
moving to the logger.
I've been following the changes in this area, and read that in the beginning it 
wasn't really reliable,
with some disturbing glitches. Somehow I left this z/OS improvement aside from 
my "to do list".
Maybe it is time to reconsider it. 
As far as the performance and saving CPU cycles, we produce only 10 million SMF 
records 
on our production LPAR. In a month.

Whether the logger would dramatically reduce CPU consuption I can't tell.
Still, it is worth having a look.

Thanks very much.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-10 Thread Walter Marguccio
> I see all my MANx are all too small...  

a higher CISZE for the MANx datasets was recommended by Cheryl Watson in her 
last
"SMF 101 everything you should know and more" presentation at Share. So I went 
to look
and discovered that all my MANx across the sysplex have a poor CISIZE, don't 
know why either.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-10 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Elardus Engelbrecht 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

> I can try out that stunt in a sandbox, but ...

I tried myself on ours, and when tried to add a brand new MANx with a
bigger CISIZE using the T SMF=xx, the system issues IEE396I.
Which doesn't leave any chance for doing that on the fly.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-10 Thread Walter Marguccio
> Q: Why to change the CISZ of the MANx datasets?
 
because they are 4096 in size, every since they were created.
I expect  better performance if I change it to 26624.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-10 Thread Walter Marguccio
Answering my onw question ...

The FM says:


"If you define a new group of SMF data sets with a different CI size, you
must re-IPL to use these data sets. When you define an SMF data set, the
logical record size must be 10 less than the CI size."   

 :-(


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Change MANx CISIZE on the fly

2012-10-09 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello all,


does the old limitiation which requires an IPL to change the CISIZE of the MANx 

VSAM datasets still apply ?
I found an old post from Skip Robinson on this subject (searched for IEE396I), 

but I wonder if things changed in the last 14 years. We are at z/OS 1.13.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: syslogd: FSUM1229 syslogd is already active

2012-10-09 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: IT Pro 

> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

> The result is that starting it from /etc/rc works, but letting TCPIP
> start it using the AUTOLOG feature ends with the message "already active".

but that doesn't make sense, does it ?
Just curious .


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: syslogd: FSUM1229 syslogd is already active

2012-10-08 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: IT Pro 
> Subject: Re: syslogd: FSUM1229 syslogd is already active


>but I don't know why SYSLOG complains there is another instance running,
> that I don't see anywhere in the process list. 

what does command D A,SYSL* show ? 


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Creating .xls on z/OS

2012-09-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Steve Goetze 


> If you would like to pursue the Hybrid Batch / Perl Linux suggestion,
> here's a sample Co:Z Launcher job that runs a perl program 

Steve,

terrific ... thanks. 



Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Creating .xls on z/OS

2012-09-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
> I wasn't unaware of Co:Z Hybrid Batch. 


"I was unaware ... ", should be ... sorry, brain cells not yet online, although 
is late afternoon, for me.

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Creating .xls on z/OS

2012-09-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
From: "McKown, John" 

> I would *STRONGLY* suggest that you try to get your management to allow you 
> to install Co:Z Hybrid Batch
John,
I wasn't unaware of Co:Z Hybrid Batch. However, we have already Co:Z Batch 
implemented on every LPARs.

Still, I need a .xls generator on the Linux side.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Creating .xls on z/OS

2012-09-17 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: "McKown, John" 


> Supposedly, but I haven't actually tried. Look at:


http://poi.apache.org/

as always, thanks to everybody for your valuable input. 
I'll try to answer to some of the questions which have been posed :

we don't have SAS, nor DB2;

.csv is considered not acceptable because it lacks features which .xls offers 
(formatting, graphs, and so on)

CPAN is worth a try, thanks to John for explaining why it might NOT work on 
z/OS. We don't have C compiler, either.

Radoslaw's comment about creating .xls on z/OS and not on a PC is surely 
correct, I forgot that we 
already offload some processes to distributed machines, depending on the 
process.
As an example, if we need to produce a single .pdf file, we use TXT2PDF on 
z/OS, pure. But if we need to produce
3,000 .pdf files, we offlload TXT2PDF's execution on a Linux box. Likewise, we 
can think of producing the raw data
on z/OS, offloading the creation of a .xls on a Linux box, where the 
availability of programs to create Excels is wider.

Sam, may I try your Cobol/assembler API ? 


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Creating .xls on z/OS

2012-09-14 Thread Walter Marguccio
Hello all,

I've been asked if there is the possibility to create Excel tables (.xls) files 
on z/OS, 
using a batch job. I've searched the archives, the developerwork IBM's site, 
redbooks,
but found no clue. 
We run the XMITIP tool which is able to create .csv files, but this seems not 
enough.

We are at z/OS 1.13, with Java 6.0.1, and Perl from the Ported Tools, 1.2.0.

Any thoughts, experiences links, books ?
 

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMP/E question

2012-09-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
From: גדי בן אבי 
Subject: SMP/E question

> What would be the recommended procedure to resolve these errors?


Gadi, 


there is no procedure to resolve the errors you see. 


If you receive the most current HOLDDATA from IBM and you receive them along
with the 700 PTFs, there is nothing you can do to 'resolve' the fact that one 
or more PTFs
won't be installable. That's what HOLDDATA are for.


One thing you ca do is to obtain a clean APPLY CHECK, removing those PTFs which,
for the reasons described by HOLDDATA, cannot be installed. 


One way to identify them is to browse the SMPRPT report and search for 'CAUSER".
The "CAUSER  SYSMOD  SUMMARY  REPORT"  lists those PTFs which can't be 
installed,
their FMID, and why they can't be installed.
Add those PTFs to the EXCLUDE list and retry you APPLY CHECK.

HTH

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Which Global zone?

2012-08-31 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Vince Getgood 
> Subject: Which Global zone?

> Is there a way of interrogating the TARGET / DLIB zone to see which GLOBAL 
> zone it is (supposed to be) a 'child' of?

What about acting the other way round ? I mean, searching the GLOBAL zone(s) 
you have around and see
if they contain information related to your "orphaned" Target/DLIB pair. The 
information one GLOBAL zone
might contain is, i.e. an FMID, or a Zone index, an Option name, an FMID set.

I'm not sure you can determine which GLOBAL zone an orphaned set of Target/DLIB 
belongs to.

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IODF for new computer

2012-07-16 Thread Walter Marguccio
> For a while, but I'm not sure that the PCHIPID's will be the same.

AFAIK, PCHIDs belonging to different models are different. For you convenience,
you can use the IBM Mapping Tool in order to keep CHIDs ("P" left out 
purposely) 
identical for both your z10 and z114. It makes life easier.

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IODF for new computer

2012-07-16 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: גדי בן אבי 
> Subject: Re: IODF for new computer

> Once I created the IODF, I can create input to IOCP that can be read by the 
> new computer.



I thought you could use your existing IODF, used by your existing z10,
to create an IOCP input file. You then give the latter to the stand-alone IOCP 
of
your z114 and make POR.
Aren't you going to share your HW (CUs, DASD, terminals, and so on) between
z10 and z114 for a while ?
 

Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IODF for new computer

2012-07-16 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: גדי בן אבי 
> Subject: IODF for new computer

> We just ordered a new z114 that will replace our z10BC.
> I have to create an IODF for the new computer.


Gadi,

are you sure you mean IODF and not IOCDS ?
One of the first thing you need to do when you get a new HW is to feed him with
your IOCDS and make a POR. Afterwards, your z114 will be able to "see"
all yout attached HW.

Can you please clarify ?


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NFS Client Start Delay

2012-07-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
Saurabh,

I would investigate how long does it take for OMVS (or Unix System Services)
to initialize and, if that takes too long, why. I would presume that the NFS 
Client
cannot start if OMVS is not completely initialized.

 
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NFS Client Start Delay

2012-07-06 Thread Walter Marguccio
Saurabh,

just a couple of questions:

> I started NFS client at 23.35.45 but it actually started at 00.10.15e. So,
> it took more then 30 min to start. Not sure, why this is happening.

When did you receive the "BPXI004I OMVS INITIALIZATION COMPLETE" message ?

Do you have a shared USS file system ?


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Easiest way to build a new SYSRES via Serverpac

2012-06-26 Thread Walter Marguccio
> From: Dana Mitchell 

> Subject: Easiest way to build a new SYSRES via Serverpac

> Software upgrade sounds like it is going to want to reach out and update my 
> existing running datasets

Software upgrade does NOT upgrade your existing running dataset, that would be 
crazy.



> I'd like a 3rd option - Create the SYSRES and DLB volume and leave it at that.

This is exactly what the "Software upgrade" option does. Upgrading a z/OS from 
one relase to another
using this option is one of the easiest methods IBM developed and made 
available to the customers.

  

> Can a guy selectively skip some of the installation jobs if they are deemed 
> not needed?

Of course you can. Beware what you skip, though.


> If IBM could just provide a full volume backup of the sysres and dlib 
> volumes, 


Many moons ago we had this option available in Italy, where the majority of the 
customers wanted
a new z/OS exactly in the form you mentioned. They did a restore, and that was 
it. This option
is not available using a ServerPac/SystemPac. But I'm pretty sure some 
countries still deliver a z/OS
as a full backup. Maybe Marna Walle or John Eells can provide more details on 
this.


Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN