Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
CTSSYNC does take volser ranges. SYNC G0-G00019 I use ranges to fix large numbers tapes at once as it is easier to code and not miss something. If you have a lot of tapes like we do, you may want to limit the size of the range per run. I usually don't do more than 100,000 at a time. An alternative is to put the command in the parm for the step and only the volsers in the file. Then run the job twice, once for each command. //CTSSYNC EXEC PGM=CTSSYNC,PARM=SCRATCH //TMSRPT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSINDD * F05935 G03314 G41312 J23288 Thank you and have a Terrific day! Jonathan Goossen, DTM ACT Mainframe Storage Group Personal: 651-361-4541 Department Support Line: 651-361- For help with communication and leadership skills checkout Woodwinds Toastmasters. IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 09/20/2012 07:30:07 AM: > From: גדי בן אבי > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 09/20/2012 07:37 AM > Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > Do I have to issue a separate command for each scartch volme? > > If I understand correctly I have to: > 1. find all of the scratch volumes in CA-1 > 2. Issue the PRIVATE,VSN command for each of them > 3. Issue the SCRATCH,VSN command for each of them. > > Is this correct? > > I have opened an issue with CA support, but haven't heard from them yet. > > Gadi > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
Gadi - In order to accomplish automatic TMC/SMS synchronization, CA-1 releases after 11.5 require the ROBTY flag in the TMC Volume Record to be properly set for SMS-controlled tape volumes in an IBM ATL/VTL as well as other libraries. R11.5 and below have no such requirement, but instead used a CA-1 user exit called during tape scratch processing which invoked the CA-1 synchronization module internally to sync newly scratched volumes in SMS. The CTSSYNC utility can be used to accomplish the same thing manually, assuming the volumes have already been set to scratch in the TMC. This assumes the volumes have also been properly defined in SMS. The CA-1 version of CBRUXENT is optional, not a requirement, depending on the environment. It would be helpful if you could provide a bit more detail on the specifics of the problem and the results from the CTSSYNC executions that don't seem to work. Frank. GSG Systems -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS They are using CA-1 v5.2. Yes, I kno they are very back level, but there are no plans to upgrade. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David [david.jou...@53.com] Sent: 20 September 2012 14:43 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS What version of CA1? We had this problem when going from CA1 V11.5 to V12.0. I'm not the CA1 support person here, but CA support knew exactly the problem. Something in CA1 changed how the library manager is being notified(or not, with the newer versions). There was something we had to turn on. I think the CA1 version of CBRUXENT became a requirement. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך ע
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
On Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:30:01 UTC+1, גדי בן אבי wrote: > Hi, > I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. > Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 > and the ATL are out of sync. > CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. > > There is no online communication between the two sites. > Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore > includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. > > How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? > I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. > Any help would be apprreciated. > Thanks > Gadi Gadi, Without knowing more details about your 2 sites configuration related to ATL and VTS, what is shared, what is not, any movement of physical tapes between sites, export/import, how scratch tapes are used at each site, no-one could offer you best advice about what is wrong nor how to correct it. If you could describe more details about tape usage, TMC backup/restore, running CA-1 on backup site, who updates TCDB on backup site . you might get better help and advice. Mike Wood -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
Do I have to issue a separate command for each scartch volme? If I understand correctly I have to: 1. find all of the scratch volumes in CA-1 2. Issue the PRIVATE,VSN command for each of them 3. Issue the SCRATCH,VSN command for each of them. Is this correct? I have opened an issue with CA support, but haven't heard from them yet. Gadi From: Russell Witt [res09...@verizon.net] Sent: 20 September 2012 15:27 To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Cc: גדי בן אבי Subject: RE: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS When you say that CTSSYNC does not work; it is probably a situation where the TCDB (the OAM database on the MF itself) and the Library Manager (the database down in the ATL itself) themselves are not in sync. Originally, for performance reasons within CTSSYNC we would compare the desired state (scratch or active) with what the TCDB says and if those two were already in-sync we would not perform an update. However, if the TCDB and LM themselves are not in-sync (something that should never happen but often does) the tape will never be used. A couple of ways to correct this, but the best way is to do a "double reset" with CTSSYNC. First, use CTSSYNC to set the status of all the scratch volumes to PRIVATE (ACTIVE). This forces the status to ACTIVE in the TCDB. Then, use CTSSYNC again to set the status of all the scratch volumes you just set to PRIVATE back to SCRATCH status. If the TCDB or originally said SCRATCH and the LM originally said ACTIVE what this double-change does is to first set the TCDB to ACTIVE (so it now matches the LM) and then sets both back to SCRATCH. If you simply tried to set the status to SCRATCH to begin with; OAM have seen that its database was already in SCRATCH and never have notified the LM. Which is probably where your problem lies. If you have any further problems, please contact CA 1 support. Even though this is an out-of-support release; they should be able to help. Russell Witt L2 Support Manager -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of âãé áï àáé Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS They are using CA-1 v5.2. Yes, I kno they are very back level, but there are no plans to upgrade. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David [david.jou...@53.com] Sent: 20 September 2012 14:43 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS What version of CA1? We had this problem when going from CA1 V11.5 to V12.0. I'm not the CA1 support person here, but CA support knew exactly the problem. Something in CA1 changed how the library manager is being notified(or not, with the newer versions). There was something we had to turn on. I think the CA1 version of CBRUXENT became a requirement. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
When you say that CTSSYNC does not work; it is probably a situation where the TCDB (the OAM database on the MF itself) and the Library Manager (the database down in the ATL itself) themselves are not in sync. Originally, for performance reasons within CTSSYNC we would compare the desired state (scratch or active) with what the TCDB says and if those two were already in-sync we would not perform an update. However, if the TCDB and LM themselves are not in-sync (something that should never happen but often does) the tape will never be used. A couple of ways to correct this, but the best way is to do a "double reset" with CTSSYNC. First, use CTSSYNC to set the status of all the scratch volumes to PRIVATE (ACTIVE). This forces the status to ACTIVE in the TCDB. Then, use CTSSYNC again to set the status of all the scratch volumes you just set to PRIVATE back to SCRATCH status. If the TCDB or originally said SCRATCH and the LM originally said ACTIVE what this double-change does is to first set the TCDB to ACTIVE (so it now matches the LM) and then sets both back to SCRATCH. If you simply tried to set the status to SCRATCH to begin with; OAM have seen that its database was already in SCRATCH and never have notified the LM. Which is probably where your problem lies. If you have any further problems, please contact CA 1 support. Even though this is an out-of-support release; they should be able to help. Russell Witt L2 Support Manager -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of âãé áï àáé Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS They are using CA-1 v5.2. Yes, I kno they are very back level, but there are no plans to upgrade. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David [david.jou...@53.com] Sent: 20 September 2012 14:43 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS What version of CA1? We had this problem when going from CA1 V11.5 to V12.0. I'm not the CA1 support person here, but CA support knew exactly the problem. Something in CA1 changed how the library manager is being notified(or not, with the newer versions). There was something we had to turn on. I think the CA1 version of CBRUXENT became a requirement. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
They are using CA-1 v5.2. Yes, I kno they are very back level, but there are no plans to upgrade. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David [david.jou...@53.com] Sent: 20 September 2012 14:43 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS What version of CA1? We had this problem when going from CA1 V11.5 to V12.0. I'm not the CA1 support person here, but CA support knew exactly the problem. Something in CA1 changed how the library manager is being notified(or not, with the newer versions). There was something we had to turn on. I think the CA1 version of CBRUXENT became a requirement. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
What version of CA1? We had this problem when going from CA1 V11.5 to V12.0. I'm not the CA1 support person here, but CA support knew exactly the problem. Something in CA1 changed how the library manager is being notified(or not, with the newer versions). There was something we had to turn on. I think the CA1 version of CBRUXENT became a requirement. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Syncronize between CA-1 and IBM ATL and VTS
Hi, I am supporting a customer that has CA-1 and an IBM ATL and VTS. Their main site has no syncronization problems, but at the backup site, CA-1 and the ATL are out of sync. CA-1 reports many virtual scratch tapes, while the VTS reports none. There is no online communication between the two sites. Once every few months, the backup site is restored from tapes. This restore includes the CA-1 TMC and AUDIT datasets. How do I sync the ATL and VTS with CA-1? I tried using the CTSSYNC utility, but it doesn't seem to work. Any help would be apprreciated. Thanks Gadi לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי. Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
