Re: REXX370 4.02 01 Dec 1998 - why is Rexx so old?
Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only thing that might be nice is to have his later ObjectREXX on z/VM That would be Simon Nash's Object REXX (just to get the attribution where it belongs :-)) Ray Mansell
Re: alternate SMTP server
THANKS!! On 17 Apr 2007 at 9:22, Alan Altmark wrote: On Tuesday, 04/17/2007 at 03:43 ZE2, Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I set up an alternate TCPIP stack - the TCPIP user has a CPUID that has a different name in the SYSTEM NETID. : Is there something to set to tell it who the correct server is? I am getting tired of 'CP TRAN SMTP R ...'. Did you set the SMTPSERVERID correctly in TCPIP DATA with the appropriate prefix? Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott -- Shimon Lebowitzmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] VM System Programmer . Israel Police National HQ. http://www.poboxes.com/shimonpgp Jerusalem, Israel phone: +972 2 542-9877 fax: 542-9308
Re: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q
On Tuesday, 04/17/2007 at 07:24 GMT, Dusha, Cecelia CIV WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guest OSs need access to the various VLANs. Would the following work? CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 645 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 745 Please advice. Yes, that will work as long as you have authorized the OSA port on the switch for VLANs 1, 545, 645, and 745. In this case, do NOT change the guest IP configuration. The guests will remain VLAN-unaware. If you share the OSA with other LPARs or VSWITCHes, they must also be VLAN-aware and you must specify NOGVRP on the DEFINE VSWITCH. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q
I want to assign the TCPIP stacks to VLAN 545. With the following definition, CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 only one VSWITCH definition would be required for multiple VLANS? CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 VLAN 645 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid3 VLAN 745 Thank you. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:31 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q On Monday, 04/16/2007 at 06:56 GMT, Dusha, Cecelia CIV WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a requirement to implement a VLAN aware tcpip. 1. The VLAN parameter on DEFINE VSWITCH must match the native VLAN of the switch. For every switch I have encountered, the default is VLAN 1. If this parameter is wrong, things won't work. (In z/VM 5.3 we have fixed this - see below.) 2. Are you sure you want TCP/IP stacks to be VLAN-aware? Or do you just want to assign them to VLAN 545? Unless the guest is acting as a VLAN router, I don't recommend giving the guest a virtual trunk port. In this case, must SET VSWITCH GRANT VLAN 545 and DON'T specify PORTTYPE TRUNK on DEFINE VSWITCH. 3. If you give them all virtual trunk ports, then each *IP stack* must ALSO be explicitly configured to use VLAN 545 (e.g. in DEVICE/LINK). I thought the following was sufficient to implement this: 'CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 CONNECT QUEUESTORAGE 8M CONTROLLER * IP IPTIMEOUT 5 NONROUTER VLAN 545 PortType TRUNK' I suggest CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 (leave other options off) CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 VLAN 545 etc. If you have RACF, it can hold the VSWITCH authorizations (incl. VLAN id) if you activate the VMLAN class. In z/VM 5.3 this can alternatively appear as: CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 565 NATIVE 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q
My guest OSs need access to the various VLANs. Would the following work? CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 645 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT guest-os1 VLAN 745 Please advice. Thank you. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Dusha, Cecelia CIV WHS/ITMD Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:45 AM To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System' Subject: RE: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q I want to assign the TCPIP stacks to VLAN 545. With the following definition, CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 only one VSWITCH definition would be required for multiple VLANS? CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 VLAN 645 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid3 VLAN 745 Thank you. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:31 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: VSWITCHes, TCPIP and 802.1Q On Monday, 04/16/2007 at 06:56 GMT, Dusha, Cecelia CIV WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a requirement to implement a VLAN aware tcpip. 1. The VLAN parameter on DEFINE VSWITCH must match the native VLAN of the switch. For every switch I have encountered, the default is VLAN 1. If this parameter is wrong, things won't work. (In z/VM 5.3 we have fixed this - see below.) 2. Are you sure you want TCP/IP stacks to be VLAN-aware? Or do you just want to assign them to VLAN 545? Unless the guest is acting as a VLAN router, I don't recommend giving the guest a virtual trunk port. In this case, must SET VSWITCH GRANT VLAN 545 and DON'T specify PORTTYPE TRUNK on DEFINE VSWITCH. 3. If you give them all virtual trunk ports, then each *IP stack* must ALSO be explicitly configured to use VLAN 545 (e.g. in DEVICE/LINK). I thought the following was sufficient to implement this: 'CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 CONNECT QUEUESTORAGE 8M CONTROLLER * IP IPTIMEOUT 5 NONROUTER VLAN 545 PortType TRUNK' I suggest CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 1 (leave other options off) CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 VLAN 545 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 VLAN 545 etc. If you have RACF, it can hold the VSWITCH authorizations (incl. VLAN id) if you activate the VMLAN class. In z/VM 5.3 this can alternatively appear as: CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSW1 RDEV 500 600 VLAN 565 NATIVE 1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid1 CP SET VSWITCH VSW1 GRANT userid2 Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
SERVICE install problem
I have a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem regarding trying to use the automated SERVICE EXEC. I have a PTF I tried to put on using SERVICE, but the process failed since I do not have a prerequisite on. I have downloaded the prereq, but I can't put it on because SERVICE wants me to do a restart on the first PTF, but I can't restart the first PTF because the prereq is not on, but I can't put the prereq on because I need restart the first PTF, but I can't . . . Is there a way to terminate the first PTF apply process, or will I need to figure out how to manually apply the prereq PTF? Thanks, Jon
Re: SERVICE install problem
On 4/17/07, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to terminate the first PTF apply process, or will I need to figure out how to manually apply the prereq PTF? Manual service really pretty straight forward. Look in the Service Guide - GC24-6117 -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems
Small remote dasd
We have an IBM DS6800 and have looked into what it would take to mirror the dasd, offsite somewhere. Not only does license fees come into play for the DS6800, but communications, a remote box and site requirements. But, when it really comes down to it, in about a year, I only need to mirror the DB2 log as in dual logging to two different disk packs. It started me to think about options. What if we had one, remotely supported disk drive on our system? What if one of our 3390-3 packs, and only one, could be mirrored to some remote system? Obviously, large shops may just mirror the entire DS6800. But in the smaller shops, perhaps there is a black box thingie out there, or perhaps a service bureau that has a solution that may be workable. Right now, this is DB2/VSE. The log files are on VSAM. Not interested in doing log archives every hour and sending the tape, over an IP connection. In the virtual tape world, there are many options. I don't know of any options in the VSE dasd world. Being able to use a NAS device as CKD disk, would really be great. I've done that with a P/390 to expand the emulated disk available. But the z/890 doesn't support emulated disk, and besides, emulated disk sure had its performance issues. Anyway, it can't hurt to ask... Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting
Re: Small remote dasd
-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Small remote dasd We have an IBM DS6800 and have looked into what it would take to mirror the dasd, offsite somewhere. Not only does license fees come into play for the DS6800, but communications, a remote box and site requirements. But, when it really comes down to it, in about a year, I only need to mirror the DB2 log as in dual logging to two different disk packs. It started me to think about options. What if we had one, remotely supported disk drive on our system? What if one of our 3390-3 packs, and only one, could be mirrored to some remote system? Obviously, large shops may just mirror the entire DS6800. But in the smaller shops, perhaps there is a black box thingie out there, or perhaps a service bureau that has a solution that may be workable. Right now, this is DB2/VSE. The log files are on VSAM. Not interested in doing log archives every hour and sending the tape, over an IP connection. In the virtual tape world, there are many options. I don't know of any options in the VSE dasd world. Being able to use a NAS device as CKD disk, would really be great. I've done that with a P/390 to expand the emulated disk available. But the z/890 doesn't support emulated disk, and besides, emulated disk sure had its performance issues. Anyway, it can't hurt to ask... Tom Duerbusch Well, there are devices on the market, such as BusTech and FlexCUB, that would allow you to use Open System DASD as ECKD DASD. You could then possibly do a remote mirror on that. No, I don't know how. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it.
Re: Small remote dasd
I don't know VSE worth squat, but can you NFS mount something? Maybe a little linux server in a remote location? Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
Re: Small remote dasd
Thanks The zDASD 3390 controller, from BusTech, seems to match my requirements. That is, it can do it, but now comes the cost portionG. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/17/2007 2:43 PM -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Small remote dasd We have an IBM DS6800 and have looked into what it would take to mirror the dasd, offsite somewhere. Not only does license fees come into play for the DS6800, but communications, a remote box and site requirements. But, when it really comes down to it, in about a year, I only need to mirror the DB2 log as in dual logging to two different disk packs. It started me to think about options. What if we had one, remotely supported disk drive on our system? What if one of our 3390-3 packs, and only one, could be mirrored to some remote system? Obviously, large shops may just mirror the entire DS6800. But in the smaller shops, perhaps there is a black box thingie out there, or perhaps a service bureau that has a solution that may be workable. Right now, this is DB2/VSE. The log files are on VSAM. Not interested in doing log archives every hour and sending the tape, over an IP connection. In the virtual tape world, there are many options. I don't know of any options in the VSE dasd world. Being able to use a NAS device as CKD disk, would really be great. I've done that with a P/390 to expand the emulated disk available. But the z/890 doesn't support emulated disk, and besides, emulated disk sure had its performance issues. Anyway, it can't hurt to ask... Tom Duerbusch Well, there are devices on the market, such as BusTech and FlexCUB, that would allow you to use Open System DASD as ECKD DASD. You could then possibly do a remote mirror on that. No, I don't know how. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it.
Re: alternate SMTP server
What I have done: TCPPR11 TCPIP - TCPMAINT 198 disk TCPPR11 DATA - TCPMAINT 592 disk SMTSETUP EXEC - TCPMAINT 198 disk U = userid() if U = 'SMTP' then 'COPY TCPIP DATA F TCPIP DATA A (OLDD REPLACE' if U = 'SMTPPB11' then 'COPY TCPPB11 DATA F TCPIP DATA A (OLDD REPLACE' if U = 'SMTPPR11' then 'COPY TCPPR11 DATA F TCPIP DATA A (OLDD REPLACE' if U = 'SMTPTR11' then 'COPY TCPTR11 DATA F TCPIP DATA A (OLDD REPLACE' Exit This ensures the SMTP server has the correct DATA file. There may be better ways to achieve this, but this works for my applications. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Shimon Lebowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8:44 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: alternate SMTP server Hi, I set up an alternate TCPIP stack - the TCPIP user has a CPUID that has a different name in the SYSTEM NETID. That TCPIP starts a different SMTP server, also on that 'other system' (CPUID). [Note: not to be confused with OtherSystem (tm?) ] My own userid is running with that CPUID, and identifies itself using that system name from the NETID. My user correctly uses the alternate stack, but when I send a note with SENDFILE ( NOTE SMTP it goes to the SMTP user, and *not* to my alternate server. Is there something to set to tell it who the correct server is? I am getting tired of 'CP TRAN SMTP R ...'. Thanks, Shimon -- ** ** Shimon Lebowitzmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] VM System Programmer . Israel Police National HQ. http://www.poboxes.com/shimonpgp Jerusalem, Israel phone: +972 2 542-9877 fax: 542-9308 ** **
Re: WGET
Charlotte (the one on Fran Hensler's download page) comes with a WW2GET EXEC which is an WGET-like product written by Jonathan Scott. WW2GET url fn ft fm (proxy CCSID nnn POST HTML WIDTH nn XLATE table USERID userid PASSWORD password It does not support HTTPS.
