Re: Performance Rules of Thumb ?

2007-05-22 Thread barton
zTUNE includes a list of over 100 rules that looks for all the problems I thought worth 
looking for in both Linux and z/VM.  Not only will it identify high cpu utilization, but 
also the Linux server and process that are causing that utilization. zTUNE was created 
with the new Linux installations in mind as I've heard of many Linux proof of concepts 
that failed for silly performance reasons.





Marcy Cortes wrote:


I think a lot of the answers will be it depends :)

But one thing that comes to mind is page space utilization.   40% I'd say
then you need to start worrying about adding more for good performance.
Page rates can vary wildly.  Like when you IPL and start bringing up all
your Linux guests - we can see 10-20K per sec to xstor and 4-8K to DASD.  I
wouldn't want to be alerted during every IPL, but if I saw those rates
during the day, I'd be worrying :)

Production we don't want to see going about  60% cpu utilization - but that
is only so that we have the white space available should one of the 3 lpars
fail.  But that's not really alerted on here - but is looked at the next day
by the perf people when they do their daily data stuff.
 

Marcy Cortes 
 


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
message.  Thank you for your cooperation.

 




From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:10 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Performance Rules of Thumb ?



Thanks for the two replies - what I'm looking for is something like this: 

cpu utilization 90% warning  99% critical 
swap rate ..% warning ..% critical 
page rate 
etc. 

Has anyone created such a list? 


thanks




Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services
(CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We're
here to make lives better. 

Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication. 


NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail,
you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing
its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 






Re: GDPS/XRC mirroring of VM volumes

2007-05-22 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz

Good news, after flashcopy yesterday and xrecover today, VM and both linuxes
that I checked came up at the DR site today. On VM, perfkit is fine, my
spool files are there, but I did have to do a cold start. Pretty slick.
MA

On 5/21/07, Mary Anne Matyaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


We didn't seem to have a problem with them. We only really have CMS,(I
think, I'm a newbie. Maybe performance monitor too?)  and it was fine. And
we only really have two real users, sysprogs. I *have* had to rebuild the
cms nss after a full volume restore before, so I would have (hopefully)
recognized that problem. I will be testing both vm and linux again this week
and will update you on our status.
We had been having problems with vm formats causing the sdms to crash, but
we put ptfs on and that problem seems to be gone, though we are opening a
pmr with a linux dasdfmt that crashed the sdms, but I have not been allowed
to try to recreate that. Maybe after the test. If the dasdfmt problem
continues, we will likely have to take all the linuxes out of xrc.
MA

On 5/21/07, Jack H. Slavick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A quick question for MAHow did you handle your NSS/DCSS files?

 Jack H. Slavick
 Acxiom Corp.





Re: VM CONSOLE Experts...I need your help

2007-05-22 Thread James M

When you set up the ICC on the HMC you defined an IP# for the ICC
itself. Let's say 192.168.1.1.
You also define pc's as potential VM consoles within ICC. Let's say
192.168.1.2 @ cuu 400 is one such pc.
After defining 400 within VM as a console and before ipl'ing vm log
onto the pc and tn3270 to 192.168.1.1.
IPL VM and the ipl should be directed to the pc assuming it has
precedence either on the sapl screen or in your system config.
-James


On 5/21/07, Joan Gerads [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



James,
what specifically did you mean by your first  question:  Did you TN3270 to the 
ICC adapter IP # before  ipl'ing.

How do you TN3270 to the IP # before ipl'ing and AFTER OSA  is reset with the 
ipl?  We had the TN3270 session ready before the IPL and  then the OSA is reset 
in the IPL, so is there a timing issue with having to get  the TN3270 session 
ready again for the IPL to find it to send the SAIPL  screen?



We think the IOCP and system config are  correct.

thanks again for your help



Joan M. Gerads
Systems  Programming
SCICOM Data Services, Ltd.
10101 Bren Rd. East
Minnetonka, MN  55343
Direct: 952-936-4170
Toll  Free: 1-800-488-9087
Fax: 952-932-3936


This e-mail message, including any attachments, is  intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) and may contain privileged and  confidential information, 
including but not limited to information that is  protected under HIPAA or 
other state/federal privacy rules.  Any  unauthorized review; disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use is  prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail 
in error, please notify the  sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the original  message.


 



From: The IBM z/VM  Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
James  M
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:54 PM
To:  IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM CONSOLE Experts...I need your  help



Joan-
There's a lot to consider  check.
Did you tn3270 to  the ICC adapter IP # before ipl'ing?
Is your iocp correct?
Is your system  config correct - console defined same as ipl device on ICC def.
Are your ICC  definitions correct - valid ipl device  pc ip # specified 
correctly
I'm  using the hummingbird emulator w/o problems.
-James


On 5/21/07, Joan  Gerads [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:



 I have a couple more questions regarding setting upa VM console through 
OSA-ICC.

 z/VM version 5.2 -
 IBM z9 2096 BC processor 1 LPAR
 VM running multiple VSE guests

 1)   is there any software restrictions as far as 3270emulator software 
running on the PC for the VM console to work on it?  Weare currently trying it 
with QWS Plus Version 4.0 (JollyGiantSoftware)?

 Is anyone else using that software? Or what isworking for you?

 2) secondly, on the HMC screen for OSA Advanced Facilities, 'active 
sessions configuration ', there is a field called 'MIFID'.  In the IBM Redbook
example, this field is set to a 'C' on a VM console definition.  On our
screen, our VM console session, it is set to a '1' (the default?)….what exactly 
does' C'mean?

 On a trial IPL of VM this last weekend, we couldnot get the OSA-ICC PC to 
come up as the VM console…I am pretty sure thesystem configuration is 
correct…we can 'DISC' from the dummy tube and'RECONNECT' on the PC.  We just 
have not figured out the VM IPL- how to get it tocome up on the OSA-ICC PC.

 Thanks again for all your help!

 Joan M. Gerads
 Systems  Programming
 SCICOM Data Services, Ltd.
 10101 Bren Rd. East
 Minnetonka, MN  55343
 Direct: 952-936-4170
 Toll  Free: 1-800-488-9087
 Fax: 952-932-3936


 This e-mail message, including any attachments, isintended only for the 
use of the recipient(s) and may contain privileged andconfidential 
information, including but not limited to information that isprotected under 
HIPAA or other state/federal privacy rules.  Anyunauthorized review; 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use isprohibited.  If you have received 
this e-mail in error, please notify thesender immediately by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the originalmessage.


































 z/VM version 5.2 -
 IBM z9 2096 BC processor 1 LPAR
 VM running multiple VSE guests


 Two questions that I could use any advice, tips ortricks with:


 We recently migrated to z/VM 5.2 and an IBM z9 BCprocessor:

 1)We recently switched our VMconsole from a dummy terminal to an OSA 
connection.  We 'disc' VM on thedummy terminal and reconnected the console on 
the PC.  That part workedfine.   We will not be IPL'ing VM until this weekend 
so my questionis: What do we need to do to have the OSA console be recognized 
as the VMconsole during an IPL of VM?   For the dummy terminal, we had the
address hard assigned in the system configuration under Console Definitions:
Operator_Consoles….How do you do that same thing with an OSA VMconsole?   

Re: CTC change

2007-05-22 Thread Anne Crabtree
Do I have to logon TCPIP to detach it or can I do it from, say, MAINT?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/21/2007 3:26 PM 
On Monday, 05/21/2007 at 10:04 AST, Anne Crabtree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 What about the SPECIAL statement in USER TCPIP?  If I change it from
 WVLNX5 to VMTEST, will it know about it without recycling TCPIP or
 doing OBEY or something?

No.  In fact, you will need to logoff/logon or DETACH the vctc and
DEFINE 
it anew.  Changing the configuration in the directory never changes the

active configuration.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: CTC change

2007-05-22 Thread Jim Bohnsack
You can use the NETSTAT command with the CP option.  Enter NETSTAT CP 
DET /cuu/.  You could also use the SECUSER (secondary user or console 
facility).  From a class A or C privileged userid, enter:


SET SECUSER TCPIP /yourid/ 


then

SEND CP TCPIP DET /cuu

/When you're done, enter:

SET SECUSER TCPIP RESET

Jim

Anne Crabtree wrote:

Do I have to logon TCPIP to detach it or can I do it from, say, MAINT?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351

  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/21/2007 3:26 PM 


On Monday, 05/21/2007 at 10:04 AST, Anne Crabtree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  

What about the SPECIAL statement in USER TCPIP?  If I change it from
WVLNX5 to VMTEST, will it know about it without recycling TCPIP or
doing OBEY or something?



No.  In fact, you will need to logoff/logon or DETACH the vctc and
DEFINE 
it anew.  Changing the configuration in the directory never changes the


active configuration.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

  



--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(607) 255-1760
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Duane Weaver
The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM 
READ all the time.


Why?


Re: set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Thomas Kern
Try doing a 'SET AUTOREAD OFF'. If it goes to 'RUNNING' then maybe you ca
n
add it to the PROFILE EXEC.

/Tom Kern

On Tue, 22 May 2007 08:56:11 -0400, Duane Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
e:

The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM
READ all the time.

Why?


Re: set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Rick Bourgeois
Try,

SET AUTOREAD OFF

Rick Bourgeois, President
Virtual Software Systems, Inc.
7715 Browns Bridge Rd
Gainesville, GA  30506
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-781-3200

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Duane Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: set run on

The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM 
READ all the time.

Why?


Re: set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Jim Bohnsack
I see that all of the time on OPERATOR ids.  Enter SET AUTOREAD OFF in 
addition to SET RUN ON. 


Why??  Who knows.
Jim

Duane Weaver wrote:
The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM 
READ all the time.


Why?

  



--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(607) 255-1760
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Duane Weaver
Thanks guys. I am not sure what caused AUTOREAD to be set on. I even 
logged Operator off and back on to make sure there was something 
setting autoread on.


Now that I know, I will keep watch to see what happens.
duane


At 09:09 AM 5/22/2007, you wrote:
I see that all of the time on OPERATOR ids.  Enter SET AUTOREAD OFF 
in addition to SET RUN ON.

Why??  Who knows.
Jim

Duane Weaver wrote:
The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM 
READ all the time.


Why?





--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(607) 255-1760
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: set run on

2007-05-22 Thread Ray Mansell

Duane Weaver wrote:
The Operator on my system has SET RUN ON.  Yet it still shows a VM 
READ all the time.


Why?
The other appenders are correct - you should include the CMS command SET 
AUTOREAD OFF in the operator's PROFILE EXEC. Note that SET AUTOREAD is a 
CMS command, while SET RUN is a CP command.


AUTOREAD is a feature that harks back to 2741 (i.e. typewriter) terminal 
days when the terminal was either in receive or transmit mode. AUTOREAD 
ON meant that when CMS was ready to accept input it would send a READ to 
the terminal, enabling you to type. However, in this mode, any output 
from the system could not be sent until the next time you pressed the 
ENTER (or some other interrupt) key.  With AUTOREAD OFF, such system 
output could be sent immediately, but the keyboard was disabled and you 
had to press the ATTN key to unlock it. Fun times. With the advent of 
the 3270 screen, there was no longer a need for this feature, since 
whatever you typed on the keyboard was buffered in the terminal. When 
you pressed ENTER, an attention was sent to the system, which in turn 
would issue a read to the terminal, which in its turn would send the 
contents of it buffer to the system. Even though AUTOREAD was no longer 
required, it was retained for compatibility (just like SET BLIP :-) )


For historical reasons, the default for AUTOREAD is ON if the virtual 
machine is autologged, and OFF if you logon from a terminal (I forget 
why). If you have a userid which is ever likely to be autologged, you'll 
probably want to include SET AUTOREAD OFF in its profile exec.


Ray Mansell


system config file

2007-05-22 Thread Richard Corak
The SYSTEM CONFIG statements are intended to be parsed like REXX 
statements.  Things in quotes remain as-is, otherwise each token gets 
folded to uppercase.  In theory, you could specify


cpowned slot 99 'a B c'

and get a really bizarre volume label.  Whether CP could use such a 
specification is another question.


Richard Corak


TCPNJE

2007-05-22 Thread Schuh, Richard
Is there anyone who has an operating TCPNJE link between VM and z/OS? If
so, would you be willing to share your link definitions/parms (both
sides of the link would be nice) or otherwise disclose your secrets?  I
am at wit's end, getting socket errors (timeout variety) in the middle
of files. If they happen on stream 1, it freezes the link. My current
definition is:

LINKDEF MVS1   TYPE TCPNJE AST RETRY   
PARM MVS1 HOST=nn.nn.nn.nn KEEPALIV=NO STREAMS=4 BUFF=8192

This definition is the one that kept the link up the longest. It took a
socket error on stream 2 and kept on chugging until it subsequently had
the failure on stream 1. 

I suppose that the JES definition could be involved in this. Our JES
person tells me that he let everything default. I do not know what the
defaults for JES are, and he wasn't very forthcoming with information.


Regards, 
Richard Schuh 




Re: TCPNJE

2007-05-22 Thread Gillis, Mark
My RSCS definitions for our TCPNJE link (which works) are as follows:

LINKDEFINE linkname AST TYPE TCPNJE NODE nodename QUEUE SIZE
RETRY

PARM   linkname ITO=100 HOST=nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn

 

I can't provide our JES2 definition, since it was been made dynamically
by our z/OS people and won't be put into a parameter file until after
our DR test a few weeks from now.

Hope this helps.

 

Regards,

Mark Gillis.



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2007 8:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: TCPNJE

 

Is there anyone who has an operating TCPNJE link between VM and z/OS? If
so, would you be willing to share your link definitions/parms (both
sides of the link would be nice) or otherwise disclose your secrets?  I
am at wit's end, getting socket errors (timeout variety) in the middle
of files. If they happen on stream 1, it freezes the link. My current
definition is:

LINKDEF MVS1   TYPE TCPNJE AST RETRY   

PARM MVS1 HOST=nn.nn.nn.nn KEEPALIV=NO STREAMS=4 BUFF=8192

This definition is the one that kept the link up the longest. It took a
socket error on stream 2 and kept on chugging until it subsequently had
the failure on stream 1. 

I suppose that the JES definition could be involved in this. Our JES
person tells me that he let everything default. I do not know what the
defaults for JES are, and he wasn't very forthcoming with information.

Regards,
Richard Schuh 



TCPNJE

2007-05-22 Thread Les Geer (607-429-3580)
Is there anyone who has an operating TCPNJE link between VM and z/OS? If
so, would you be willing to share your link definitions/parms (both
sides of the link would be nice) or otherwise disclose your secrets?  I
am at wit's end, getting socket errors (timeout variety) in the middle
of files. If they happen on stream 1, it freezes the link. My current
definition is:

LINKDEF MVS1   TYPE TCPNJE AST RETRY  =20
PARM MVS1 HOST=3Dnn.nn.nn.nn KEEPALIV=3DNO STREAMS=3D4 BUFF=3D8192

This definition is the one that kept the link up the longest. It took a
socket error on stream 2 and kept on chugging until it subsequently had
the failure on stream 1.=20

I suppose that the JES definition could be involved in this. Our JES
person tells me that he let everything default. I do not know what the
defaults for JES are, and he wasn't very forthcoming with information.



I recommend you open an incident with JES support to determine why the
stream requests are being rejected.


Best Regards,
Les Geer
IBM z/VM and Linux Development