Re: CMS Pipelines for Windows

2010-08-31 Thread James Laing
Pipelines was never intended to represent a port of CMS Pipelines - nor w
as 
it originally intended for anything other than a useful tool for those ti
mes 
when you might need to modify/translate some data.

My background was as a VM/TPF systems programmer and one day I realised t
hat 
I could really use a tool 'like' CMS Pipelines - but there wasn't one on 
my 
Windows platform. So I wrote Pipelines.

James.


Re: CMS Pipelines for Windows

2010-08-31 Thread James Laing
I have had a chance to look through a bunch of interesting stuff on this 

forum/discussion platform, which up until the last day or so .. I didn't 
even 
know existed.

As I said in my previous post; Pipelines was written as a useful (hopeful
ly) 
tool - but if anyone has any suggestions on how to take the project forwa
rd 
in terms of 'what would make it more useful' then please let me know.

I am currently looking into how to bind variables in OOREXX, so that I ca
n 
write VAR and STEM stages.


Re: CMS Pipelines for Windows

2010-08-31 Thread Richard Troth
This is awesome work you've done.

There are two or three strong implementations of Pipelines for
non-CMS/TSO environments.  I don't mean to dis any of them.  I'm
looking for something written in C for maximum efficiency and
portability.  Having a core that is pure C does not prohibit some of
the STAGES being written in C++ or anything else.

Some months back, I began to assemble the following into runnable
code.  It is not complete, but the idea is ...

two Unix pipe() pairs for each effective Pipelines connection
wrapper functions output(), peekto(), and readto() are illustrated below

The two Unix pipes go opposite directions.  One goes forward and
carries data (duh!) and also any meta data (such as length of the
record available, if any) from producer to consumer.  The other goes
backward and carries requests and feedback from consumer to producer.
So a record flows something like ...

producer calls output()
consumer calls peekto()
under the covers, peekto() sends STAT backward
output() sends metadata forward (most interesting being size
of the record)
assuming the buffer can hold the record, peekto() sends PEEK backward
output() then sends the data

A readto() does all of the above plus sends NEXT at the end and
output() can return.  When output() returns, the producer is unblocked
and we get proper record flow.  (You can dealy the record ... or not!)

The design starts with two Unix pipes but can use shared mem if the
platform supports that.  The code is accomodating.  (A NULL pointer to
a shared mem struct means don't use shared mem.)

-- R;   





On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:17, James Laing james_la...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
 Pipelines was never intended to represent a port of CMS Pipelines - nor was
 it originally intended for anything other than a useful tool for those times
 when you might need to modify/translate some data.

 My background was as a VM/TPF systems programmer and one day I realised that
 I could really use a tool 'like' CMS Pipelines - but there wasn't one on my
 Windows platform. So I wrote Pipelines.

 James.



Re: Running back level VSE on a z/10 with VM6.1

2010-08-31 Thread Billy Bingham
This is from the VSE support page:

These releases will not run on z990, z890, z9 or z10 servers. However, for 
transition purposes, a temporary patch may be available. Be aware, these 
releases are unsupported and the temporary patch does not in any way 
imply supported status. Use of unsupported releases is always at the user's 
risk. If you are interested in running one of these releases on any of the 
servers indicated, please contact the Z/VSE Team.


Billy

On 30 Aug 2010 at 13:04, Tony Thigpen wrote:

 VSE 2.2 is not even Y2K certified.
 
 IBM has some patches to allow old VSE's to run on newer hardware, but I
 don't think they go back to 2.2. You would have to contact the z/VSE
 development group directly to ask. I understand that they require that
 you commit to installing a supported VSE within 6 months(?) before they
 will give them to you.
 
 
 Tony Thigpen
 
 -Original Message -
  From: Yosua, Sara
  Sent: 08/30/2010 04:20 PM
  Although it is obviously not supported, does anyone know of any
  technical reason why a back level VSE/ESA 2.2 guest would not IPL and
  run under z/VM 6.1 on a z/10 ?
  
  Thank you for any feedback.
  
   
  
  Sara E Yosua
  
   
  
   
  
 




Re: CMS Pipelines for Windows

2010-08-31 Thread James Laing
Hi.

Thank you very much!

My design is based around the concept of a sort of 'client-server' 
approach. In my little version of Pipelines; the StageManager provides th
e 
central 'server' system that services input and output requests from the 

various stages. 

The StageManager does not 'know' about stages and it does not coordinate 

them; it simply (obviously with other support stuff) reads and writes 
records when it is asked to.

Each stage is responsible for parsing its argument, allocating any data 

structures that it may need during its runtime phase .. and then at 
dispatch time .. its a free-for-all. But because the ReadRecord(), 
PeekRecord() etc functions all call into the StageManager; it simply lock
s 
and releases stages as and when they call the appropriate function.

There is no commit level stuff .. or anything like that .. and there is n
o 
'central brain' which coordinates what can run and when.. it runs by the 

way the stages interconnect. 

Again .. thanks for the support!

Regards.
James Laing.




Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Billy Bingham
Frank,

Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the 
VSWITCH?


Thanks,

Billy

On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 
 Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a COUPLEd 
 VSWITCH:
 
 UnCOUPLEd:
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS: 
 8992
 
 COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT 
 
 ...and initialized:
 * cp q v nic aa0 
 details
 AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices: 
 3 
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM 
 VSWAILT 
 AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors: 
 0 
 AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors: 
 0 
 AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes: 
 2884 
 AR 0015 Connection Name: Session 
 Established
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-
 READ 
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-
 WRITE 
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065 
 Index:
 0065
 
 AR 0015 Options: 
 IPv4 
 AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses: 
 
 AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-
 0E 
 AR 0015 1I40I READY 
 
 
 Thanks Alan!
 
 
 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 
 Behalf Of Alan Altmark
 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
 
 On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers 
 framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
  * cp q v nic aa0 details
  
  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3
  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None 
 
 And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by the 
 * 
 None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet 
 cable.
 
 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott
 
 _ This message 
 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely 
 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
 recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, 
 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us 
 at privacy...@ailife.com. 




Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?

2010-08-31 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
In SHOPZ, for Electronic Delivery, is it necessary to order DDR  to get a 
DVD image for upload (ftping) to VM? 

I installed 5.4 last October from an Electronic Delivery using Chapters 6 
and 7 of the IBM Guide For Automated Installation and Service by ftping a 
DVD image up to VM.  It  went very smoothly.

I am now installing 6.1 and trying to do the same thing again. 

But for Electronic Delivery, SHOPZ requires ordering  DDR , not DVD.  When 
we ftped it down to a laptop and unzipped it, we found a DVD image as well 
as other files.

Am I doing something wrong or is this how it is supposed to work?



I





Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?

2010-08-31 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 09:00 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 In SHOPZ, for Electronic Delivery, is it necessary to order DDR  to get 
a DVD 
 image for upload (ftping) to VM?   
 
 I installed 5.4 last October from an Electronic Delivery using Chapters 
6 and 7 
 of the IBM Guide For Automated Installation and Service by ftping a DVD 
image 
 up to VM.  It  went very smoothly. 
 
 I am now installing 6.1 and trying to do the same thing again.   
 
 But for Electronic Delivery, SHOPZ requires ordering  DDR , not DVD. 
 When we 
 ftped it down to a laptop and unzipped it, we found a DVD image as well 
as 
 other files.
 
 Am I doing something wrong or is this how it is supposed to work? 

You order the DVD version of the product, not the DDR, and select a tape 
format (which is ignored, but required).  Why do you say that Shopz 
requires the DDR?  I just set up a Shopz order (short of actually shipping 
it), and it didn't whine about needing the DDR.

If you navigate to How to buy on the z/VM Home Page, you find a couple 
of Ordering tips links.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: CMS Pipelines for Windows

2010-08-31 Thread James Laing
I see what you mean .. but how about a central 'service unit' that handle
s 
all the input and output. The stages don't need to know anything about ea
ch 
other .. they just request records and write records and that's it.

A stage cannot be expected to 'know' about what it's input and output str
eams 
are connected to; it's a worker bee. In my version (limited as it is) eac
h 
stage is nothing more than a DLL that gets loaded by the StageManager, ki
cked 
off and it starts requesting records. The StageManager only services requ
ests 
as and when it is asked to. By providing a set of interface functions tha
t 
(in the StageManager) cause locking/unlocking; all of the internal pipeli
ne 
complexity is hidden from the stage designer.

Let me know what you think.

James.


Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?

2010-08-31 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
I have done as you said and here are the instructions.  I have bolded the 
text in question.  The instructions call for selecting DDR.  Then the 
instructions at the bottom for installing from FTP Server, Chapter 7, Step 
3 of Guide For Automated Installation and Service, call for using the 
downloaded DVD image.

Apparently, we are to download DDR to upload DVD.


 IBM Systems System z z/VM   
 
 How specify Internet Delivery for your z/VM order on ShopzSeries 
 Effective January 25, 2008, the z/VM base operating system and base 
options are available for Internet delivery for orders placed using 
ShopzSeries in countries where it is available. We know many of our 
customers have requested Internet delivery and IBM is pleased to offer it 
to you. Thank you for your continued interest in z/VM. 


In addition to shipment on tape cartridges and DVD, z/VM is available for 
download from the Internet through ShopzSeries. 

Tips for ordering Internet delivery of z/VM via ShopzSeries 

In ShopzSeries, a black diamond () symbol indicates that electronic 
delivery is available for your z/VM product selection, even though you are 
shown only the two choices -- DDR or DVD. On a ski trail, black diamond 
signs mark the difficult/advanced ski trails. Ironic as it may seem, IBM 
is not using the black diamond symbol to indicate a degree of difficulty 
in ordering electronic delivery of z/VM. Use the tips below to help you 
know which pulldown selections you need, and which buttons to click on 
various screens. 

Once you are signed into ShopzSeries to create a new order: 

Select z/VM for the Operating Environment and select Products for Package 
Category 

Select the Hardware System where you plan to use this order 

On the Shop for Products screen, select Base Product for Group and also 
choose your language and filter. Do NOT click on Continue, instead click 
SHOW CATALOG ! 

When you see the catalog list, select DDR and then select Internet 

Continue if you need to select new licenses, do so. 

To specify delivery options, choose Internet on the Preferred Media 
pull-down and click on Go to be able to indicate any special instructions, 
and then click Continue. 

On the Review and Submit page, you have an opportunity to review and 
change your order before submitting it. Once you have submitted and 
confirmed your order, the next screen shows you a list of your orders and 
their status. 
The internet download can be performed using the instructions that are in 
the post-order email or by clicking on the Internet Download link on the 
order status page. 

For your convenience and planning, you can review the instructions for 
z/VM V5.4. 
See also: 
- How to Buy page 
- SDO page 

Installing z/VM V5.4.0
Installation instructions can be found in the Guide for Automated 
Installation and Service, GC24-6099,
Part 2, z/VM System Image DVD Installation. Select the instructions in 
Part 2 that match the type of
installation you are performing (first or second level, installing from 
DVDs, FTP server or VM minidisk
(second level only)).
The Guide for Automated Installation and Service and the Program 
Directory for z/VM and related
products are available online at the following website: 
http://www.vm.ibm.com/library/
IBM, 
 
 
 
 



Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
08/31/2010 09:35 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?






On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 09:00 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 In SHOPZ, for Electronic Delivery, is it necessary to order DDR  to get 
a DVD 
 image for upload (ftping) to VM? 
 
 I installed 5.4 last October from an Electronic Delivery using Chapters 
6 and 7 
 of the IBM Guide For Automated Installation and Service by ftping a DVD 
image 
 up to VM.  It  went very smoothly. 
 
 I am now installing 6.1 and trying to do the same thing again. 
 
 But for Electronic Delivery, SHOPZ requires ordering  DDR , not DVD. 
 When we 
 ftped it down to a laptop and unzipped it, we found a DVD image as well 
as 
 other files.
 
 Am I doing something wrong or is this how it is supposed to work? 

You order the DVD version of the product, not the DDR, and select a tape 

format (which is ignored, but required).  Why do you say that Shopz 
requires the DDR?  I just set up a Shopz order (short of actually shipping 

it), and it didn't whine about needing the DDR.

If you navigate to How to buy on the z/VM Home Page, you find a couple 
of Ordering tips links.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott



Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
No problem.

 

Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP.  I
wished to move this to a layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes.  (Much
of the following was derived from the IBM Redbook Linux on IBM eserver
zSeries and S/390:  VSWITCH and VLAN Features of z/VM 4.4)

 

 

1)   Define the VSWITCH

a.  define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3

b.   -and- add the same statement to 'SYSTEM CONFIG' file
(Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)

2)   Granting access to the VSWITCH

a.  set vswitch vswitchname grant userid

b.   -and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchname  GRAnt userid to 'SYSTEM
CONFIG'

c.   - or - add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup

3)   Defining the simulated NICs

a.   for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio

b.   -and- add to the directory for userid:
NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
(a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off then
on)

4)   Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to
system vswitchname
(This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is logged
on.)

 

(Don't think I missed anything) 

 

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Billy Bingham
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

Frank,

 

Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the VSWITCH?

 

 

Thanks,

 

Billy

 

On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 

 

 Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
COUPLEd 

 VSWITCH:

 

 UnCOUPLEd:

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS: 

 8992

 

 COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT 

 

 ...and initialized:

 * cp q v nic aa0 

 details

 AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices: 

 3 

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM 

 VSWAILT 

 AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes: 

 2884 

 AR 0015 Connection Name: Session 

 Established

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-

 READ 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-

 WRITE 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065 

 Index:

 0065

 

 AR 0015 Options: 

 IPv4 

 AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses: 

 

 AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-

 0E 

 AR 0015 1I40I READY 

 

 

 Thanks Alan!

 

 

 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

 

 -Original Message-

 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 

 Behalf Of Alan Altmark

 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM

 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

 On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers 

 framaek...@ailife.com wrote:

  * cp q v nic aa0 details

  

  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None 

 

 And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
the 

 * 

 None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet


 cable.

 

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM Development

 IBM Endicott

 

 _ This message 

 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
solely 

 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 

 recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying,
distribution, 

 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 

 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify
us 

 at privacy...@ailife.com. 

 

  


_
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any 
review, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
privacy...@ailife.com.


Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Pace
A couple of things
On the DEFINE VSWITCH you only need to specify the 1st address of the
triplet.

On the NICDEF   add  LAN SYSTEM switchNameand it will be coupled
automatically when you logon.
  example
NICDEF 061C TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3 LAN SYSTEM VSWTCH3
 OR
 SPECIAL 061C QDIO 3 SYSTEM VSWTCH3



On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.comwrote:

  No problem.



 Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP.  I
 wished to move this to a layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes.  (Much of
 the following was derived from the IBM Redbook “Linux on IBM eserver zSeries
 and S/390:  VSWITCH and VLAN Features of z/VM 4.4”)





 1)   Define the VSWITCH

 *a.  **define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3*

 b.   –and- add the same statement to ‘SYSTEM CONFIG’ file
 (Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)

 2)   Granting access to the VSWITCH

 *a.  **set vswitch vswitchname grant userid*

 b.   –and- add *Modify VSwitch vswitchname  GRAnt userid* to ‘SYSTEM
 CONFIG’

 c.   – or – add the *set vswitch* command in the AUTOLOG1 startup

 3)   Defining the simulated NICs

 a.   *for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio*

 b.   –and- add to the directory for *userid*:
 NICDEF *ccuu4* TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
 (a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off then
 on)

 4)   Attaching the simulated NIC with *couple ccuu4 to
 system vswitchname
 *(This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is logged
 on.)



 (Don’t think I missed anything)



 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.




  --

 *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On
 Behalf Of *Billy Bingham
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails



 Frank,



 Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the VSWITCH?





 Thanks,



 Billy



 On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:



 

  Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
 COUPLEd

  VSWITCH:

 

  UnCOUPLEd:

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS:

  8992

 

  COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT

 

  ...and initialized:

  * cp q v nic aa0

  details

  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices:

  3

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM

  VSWAILT

  AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors:

  0

  AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors:

  0

  AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes:

  2884

  AR 0015 Connection Name: Session

  Established

  AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-

  READ

  AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-

  WRITE

  AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065

  Index:

  0065

 

  AR 0015 Options:

  IPv4

  AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses:

 

  AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-

  0E

  AR 0015 1I40I READY

 

 

  Thanks Alan!

 

 

  Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

 

  -Original Message-

  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
 On

  Behalf Of Alan Altmark

  Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM

  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

  Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

  On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers

  framaek...@ailife.com wrote:

   * cp q v nic aa0 details

  

   AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3

   AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None

 

  And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
 the

  *

  None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet

  cable.

 

  Alan Altmark

  z/VM Development

  IBM Endicott

 

  _ This message

  contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely

  for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended

  recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,

  or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you

  have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us

  at privacy...@ailife.com.




  _ This message
 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for
 the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be
 aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
 contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
 in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us 

Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
1)   Yes, but you can have up to 3 triplets (9 address total)

2)   Didn't know about the LAN SYSTEM switchname

 

 

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

A couple of things

On the DEFINE VSWITCH you only need to specify the 1st address of the
triplet.

 

On the NICDEF   add  LAN SYSTEM switchNameand it will be coupled
automatically when you logon.

  example 

NICDEF 061C TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3 LAN SYSTEM VSWTCH3

 OR

 SPECIAL 061C QDIO 3 SYSTEM VSWTCH3 

 

 

 

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:

No problem.

 

Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP.  I
wished to move this to a layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes.  (Much
of the following was derived from the IBM Redbook Linux on IBM eserver
zSeries and S/390:  VSWITCH and VLAN Features of z/VM 4.4)

 

 

1)   Define the VSWITCH

a.  define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3

b.   -and- add the same statement to 'SYSTEM CONFIG' file
(Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)

2)   Granting access to the VSWITCH

a.  set vswitch vswitchname grant userid

b.   -and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchname  GRAnt userid to 'SYSTEM
CONFIG'

c.   - or - add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup

3)   Defining the simulated NICs

a.   for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio

b.   -and- add to the directory for userid:
NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
(a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off then
on)

4)   Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to
system vswitchname
(This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is logged
on.)

 

(Don't think I missed anything) 

 

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Billy Bingham
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

Frank,

 

Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the VSWITCH?

 

 

Thanks,

 

Billy

 

On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 

 

 Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
COUPLEd 

 VSWITCH:

 

 UnCOUPLEd:

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS: 

 8992

 

 COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT 

 

 ...and initialized:

 * cp q v nic aa0 

 details

 AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices: 

 3 

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM 

 VSWAILT 

 AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes: 

 2884 

 AR 0015 Connection Name: Session 

 Established

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-

 READ 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-

 WRITE 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065 

 Index:

 0065

 

 AR 0015 Options: 

 IPv4 

 AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses: 

 

 AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-

 0E 

 AR 0015 1I40I READY 

 

 

 Thanks Alan!

 

 

 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

 

 -Original Message-

 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 

 Behalf Of Alan Altmark

 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM

 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

 On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers 

 framaek...@ailife.com wrote:

  * cp q v nic aa0 details

  

  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None 

 

 And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
the 

 * 

 None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet


 cable.

 

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM Development

 IBM Endicott

 

 _ This message 

 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
solely 

 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 

 recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying,
distribution, 

 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 

 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify
us 

 at privacy...@ailife.com. 

 

  


Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Billy Bingham
What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?


Thanks,

Billy

On 31 Aug 2010 at 9:04, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:


 No problem.

 Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP. I 
 wished to move this to a
 layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes. (Much of the following was 
 derived from the IBM
 Redbook Linux on IBM eserver zSeries and S/390: VSWITCH and VLAN 
 Features of z/VM 4.4)


 1)Define the VSWITCH
 a.define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3
 b.-and- add the same statement to `SYSTEM CONFIG´file
 (Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)
 2)Granting access to the VSWITCH
 a.set vswitch vswitchname grant userid
 b.-and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchnameGRAnt userid to `SYSTEM CONFIG´
 c.- or - add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup
 3)Defining the simulated NICs
 a.for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio
 b.-and- add to the directory for userid:
 NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
 (a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off then 
 on)
 4)Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to system vswitchname
 (This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is logged 
 on.)

 (Don´t think I missed anything)


 Frank M.
 Ramaekers Jr.





 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 
 Behalf Of
 Billy Bingham
 Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails


 Frank,

 Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the VSWITCH?


 Thanks,

 Billy

 On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 
 Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
 COUPLEd
 VSWITCH:
 
 UnCOUPLEd:
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS:
 8992
 
 COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT
 
 ...and initialized:
 * cp q v nic aa0
 details
 AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices:
 3
 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM
 VSWAILT
 AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors:
 0
 AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors:
 0
 AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes:
 2884
 AR 0015 Connection Name: Session
 Established
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-
 READ
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-
 WRITE
 AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065
 Index:
 0065
 
 AR 0015 Options:
 IPv4
 AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses:
 
 AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-
 0E
 AR 0015 1I40I READY
 
 
 Thanks Alan!
 
 
 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
 Behalf Of Alan Altmark
 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
 
 On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers
 framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
  * cp q v nic aa0 details
 
  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3
  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None
 
 And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
 the
 *
 None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet
 cable.
 
 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott
 
 _ This message
 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
  recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying,
 distribution,
 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify
 us
 at privacy...@ailife.com.



 _ This message
 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
 recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,
 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us
 at privacy...@ailife.com.




Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
The stack has to have this capability.   AFAIK, only Linux can do this.

 

 

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Billy Bingham
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?

 

 

Thanks,

 

Billy

 

On 31 Aug 2010 at 9:04, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 

 

 No problem.

 

 Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for
TCP/IP. I wished to move this to a 

 layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes. (Much of the following
was derived from the IBM 

 Redbook Linux on IBM eserver zSeries and S/390: VSWITCH and VLAN
Features of z/VM 4.4)

 

 

 1)Define the VSWITCH

 a.define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3

 b.-and- add the same statement to 'SYSTEM CONFIG'file

 (Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be
used)

 2)Granting access to the VSWITCH

 a.set vswitch vswitchname grant userid

 b.-and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchnameGRAnt userid to 'SYSTEM CONFIG'

 c.- or - add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup

 3)Defining the simulated NICs

 a.for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio

 b.-and- add to the directory for userid:

 NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3

 (a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged
off then on)

 4)Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to system vswitchname

 (This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is
logged on.)

 

 (Don't think I missed anything)

 

 

 Frank M. 

 Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of 

 Billy Bingham

 Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM

 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

 

 Frank,

 

 Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the
VSWITCH?

 

 

 Thanks,

 

 Billy

 

 On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 

  

 Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a 

 COUPLEd 

 VSWITCH:

 

 UnCOUPLEd:

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS: 

 8992

 

 COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT 

 

 ...and initialized:

 * cp q v nic aa0 

 details

 AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices: 

 3 

 AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM 

 VSWAILT 

 AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors: 

 0 

 AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes: 

 2884 

 AR 0015 Connection Name: Session 

 Established

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-

 READ 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-

 WRITE 

 AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065 

 Index:

 0065

 

 AR 0015 Options: 

 IPv4 

 AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses: 

 

 AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-

 0E 

 AR 0015 1I40I READY 

 

 

 Thanks Alan!

 

 

 Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

 

 -Original Message-

 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 

 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 

 Behalf Of Alan Altmark

 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM

 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

 

 On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers 

 framaek...@ailife.com wrote:

  * cp q v nic aa0 details

  

  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3

  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None 

 

 And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated
by 

 the 

 * 

 None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged
ethernet 

 cable.

 

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM Development

 IBM Endicott

  

 _ This
message 

 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
solely 

 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended 

  recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, 

 distribution, 

 or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If
you 

 have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and
notify 

 us 

 at privacy...@ailife.com. 

 

 

 

 _ This message 

 contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
solely 

 for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 

 recipient, be aware 

Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Pace
Learned something today - I didn't realize there could be 2 backup triplets.

Sorry for raising the SNR!  ;-)



On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:

 On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 10:11 EDT, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  A couple of things
  On the DEFINE VSWITCH you only need to specify the 1st address of the
 triplet.

 That's not a triplet.  It's a specification of a primary and two backup
 OSA triplets.  E.g. RDEV 1E00 1F00 2000.

  On the NICDEF   add  LAN SYSTEM switchNameand it will be coupled
  automatically when you logon.
example
  NICDEF 061C TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3 LAN SYSTEM VSWTCH3
   OR
   SPECIAL 061C QDIO 3 SYSTEM VSWTCH3

 Please use NICDEF instead of SPECIAL.

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott




-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems


Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 10:32 EDT, Billy Bingham 
billy.bingham...@suddenlink.net wrote:
 What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?

If the VSWITCH is defined with the ETHERNET option, it is layer 2.  If you 
let it default to (or specify) the IP option, it is layer 3.  Only z/OS is 
limited to layer 3.  Everyone else (with current software) can use layer 
2.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Pace
When did VSE pick up layer 2 support?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:

 On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 10:32 EDT, Billy Bingham
 billy.bingham...@suddenlink.net wrote:
  What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?

 If the VSWITCH is defined with the ETHERNET option, it is layer 2.  If you
 let it default to (or specify) the IP option, it is layer 3.  Only z/OS is
 limited to layer 3.  Everyone else (with current software) can use layer
 2.

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott




-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems


Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Pace
DEFINE VSWITCH VSWTCH1 RDEV 0600 CONTR * *ETH*-* Layer 2  *
Define VSWITCH VSWTCH3 RDEV 0604 CONTR ** IP*  -*Layer 3*

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Billy Bingham 
billy.bingham...@suddenlink.net wrote:

  What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?


  Thanks,

  Billy

  On 31 Aug 2010 at 9:04, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

  
  No problem.
 
  Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP.
 I wished to move this to a
  layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes. (Much of the following was
 derived from the IBM
  Redbook “Linux on IBM eserver zSeries and S/390: VSWITCH and VLAN
 Features of z/VM 4.4”)
 
 
  1)Define the VSWITCH
  a.define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3
  b.–and- add the same statement to ‘SYSTEM CONFIG’file
  (Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)
  2)Granting access to the VSWITCH
  a.set vswitch vswitchname grant userid
  b.–and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchnameGRAnt userid to ‘SYSTEM CONFIG’
  c.– or – add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup
  3)Defining the simulated NICs
  a.for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio
  b.–and- add to the directory for userid:
  NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
  (a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off
 then on)
  4)Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to system vswitchname
  (This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is
 logged on.)
 
  (Don’t think I missed anything)
 
 
  Frank M.
  Ramaekers Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
 On Behalf Of
  Billy Bingham
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
 
 
  Frank,
 
  Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the
 VSWITCH?
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Billy
 
  On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
 
  
  Thanks, that helpsthe difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
  COUPLEd
  VSWITCH:
  
  UnCOUPLEd:
  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS:
  8992
  
  COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):
  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT
  
  ...and initialized:
  * cp q v nic aa0
  details
  AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices:
  3
  AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM
  VSWAILT
  AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors:
  0
  AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors:
  0
  AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes:
  2884
  AR 0015 Connection Name: Session
  Established
  AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-
  READ
  AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-
  WRITE
  AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065
  Index:
  0065
  
  AR 0015 Options:
  IPv4
  AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses:
  
  AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-
  0E
  AR 0015 1I40I READY
  
  
  Thanks Alan!
  
  
  Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
  [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
  Behalf Of Alan Altmark
  Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
  
  On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers
  framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
   * cp q v nic aa0 details
  
   AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3
   AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None
  
  And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
  the
  *
  None. An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet
  cable.
  
  Alan Altmark
  z/VM Development
  IBM Endicott
  
  _ This message
  contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
 solely
  for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
   recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying,
  distribution,
  or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If
 you
  have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and
 notify
  us
  at privacy...@ailife.com.
 
 
 
  _ This message
  contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
  for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
  recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,
  or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
  have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us
  at privacy...@ailife.com.






-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior 

Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?

2010-08-31 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 09:54 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 I have done as you said and here are the instructions. I have
bolded the text 
 in question. The instructions call for selecting DDR. Then
the instructions 
 at the bottom for installing from FTP Server, Chapter 7, Step 3 of
Guide For 
 Automated Installation and Service, call for using the downloaded
DVD image. 
 
 Apparently, we are to download DDR to upload DVD. 

Ah, now I understand (I think).

Big Picture: There are three possible ways to
get z/VM:
1. On DVD by ordering z/VM System Image DVD
on 3590 or 3592. (Huh?) Don't worry - you won't receive a tape, just
a DVD.
2. Electronically, by ordering z/VM 3390 System
DDR using Internet delivery. But don't be fooled by the name!
It is actually a softcopy of the DVD contents (not an iso file).
3. On tape by ordering z/VM 3390 System DDR
on 3590 or 3592. Aha! You actually get what you seem to have
ordered.

For reasons that are both embarrassing and inexplicable,
we do not yet have the ability to have a single z/VM product (e.g. z/VM
V6.1) available in four different media types (DVD, 3590, 3592, Softcopy).
Progress is occurring, but it's slow.

If you want to install from FTP using, you order the
DDR with electronic delivery and follow the special instructions included
with the order. Those instructions have you load the softcopy files
into your FTP server. You can also create a DVD from them.

Your completed Shopz order contains links to instructions
on how to do that. (I worry that people don't see them.) If you'd like
to see them:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/install/vm54inst.pdf
http://www.vm.ibm.com/install/vm61inst.pdf

Most people create a DVD so that they have a bootable
system recovery disc just in case.

We are making efforts to improve the Planning sections
of the Automated Installation book and the post-order instructions so that
the above will be more obvious, with explicit references between the two.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?

2010-08-31 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
tyvm, Alan, it explains everything.




Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
08/31/2010 04:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Electronic Delivery - DDR or DVD?







On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 09:54 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 I have done as you said and here are the instructions.  I have bolded 
the text 
 in question.  The instructions call for selecting DDR.  Then the 
instructions 
 at the bottom for installing from FTP Server, Chapter 7, Step 3 of Guide 
For 
 Automated Installation and Service, call for using the downloaded DVD 
image. 
 
 Apparently, we are to download DDR to upload DVD. 

Ah, now I understand (I think). 

Big Picture:  There are three possible ways to get z/VM: 
1. On DVD by ordering z/VM System Image DVD on 3590 or 3592. (Huh?) 
Don't worry - you won't receive a tape, just a DVD. 
2. Electronically, by ordering z/VM 3390 System DDR using Internet 
delivery.  But don't be fooled by the name!  It is actually a softcopy of 
the DVD contents (not an iso file). 
3. On tape by ordering z/VM 3390 System DDR on 3590 or 3592.  Aha!  You 
actually get what you seem to have ordered. 

For reasons that are both embarrassing and inexplicable, we do not yet 
have the ability to have a single z/VM product (e.g. z/VM V6.1) available 
in four different media types (DVD, 3590, 3592, Softcopy).  Progress is 
occurring, but it's slow.

If you want to install from FTP using, you order the DDR with electronic 
delivery and follow the special instructions included with the order. 
Those instructions have you load the softcopy files into your FTP server. 
You can also create a DVD from them. 

Your completed Shopz order contains links to instructions on how to do 
that. (I worry that people don't see them.) If you'd like to see them: 
http://www.vm.ibm.com/install/vm54inst.pdf 
http://www.vm.ibm.com/install/vm61inst.pdf 

Most people create a DVD so that they have a bootable system recovery disc 
just in case. 

We are making efforts to improve the Planning sections of the Automated 
Installation book and the post-order instructions so that the above will 
be more obvious, with explicit references between the two. 

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott