Re: A Data Center near Tokyo Japan

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Gribbin
 All I can say is: wow. You guys got REALLY lucky.

What's that old saying about, 'The harder I work the luckier I get'?

It looks to me as though IBM engineers really, 'lucky' equipment. g


Re: A Data Center near Tokyo Japan

2011-03-18 Thread Gregg Levine
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Gribbin jeff.grib...@gmail.com wrote:
 All I can say is: wow. You guys got REALLY lucky.

 What's that old saying about, 'The harder I work the luckier I get'?

 It looks to me as though IBM engineers really, 'lucky' equipment. g


Hello!
Second the motion!
Tom, I wish you well over where you are.

-- 
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again.


Re: EMC definitions for SnapShot PAV

2011-03-18 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 03/15/2011 at 06:59 EDT, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 I've got a customer that performed a DRP test last weekend.  The disks 
at the 
 DRP site are EMC, and he uses Snapshot plus PAV.
 
 The customer told me that in Jan 2010, EMC told him to define most disks 
as 
 unsupported, like this:
 
RDEV 5126-513B TY UNSUP DEVCL DASD DPS Y RESERVE_REL Y 
 
 But, at IPL, I already get lost of these:
HCPIIO6861I Device 5186 cannot be varied online because it is an 
alias 
 Parallel Access Volume for which the base could not be located.
 I found out that these messages appear for disks whose base address is 
defined 
 as unsupported.
 
 That's not that bad, but in addition, the customer want to define quite 
some 
 disks as MDISK DEVNO so they can be shared between the z/OS guests.  
Like this
  MDISK 5809 3390 DEVNO 5809 MWV
 This makes we get lots of 
   HCPLNM117E Userid xx not linked; volid conflict 
 We get these messages for the disks that are defined defined as 
Unsupported.
 
 I understand perfectly well that it is impossible to define an MDISK on 
an 
 unsupported device.  But, the customer replied me that EMC told them to 
work 
 this way.
 
 My question: is it really required to define the disks that are 
candidate as 
 Snapshot target as unsupported.  Or is there another reason to do it?
 (my customer doesn't remember exactly why, but he told me that the EMC 
guys 
 giving him that advice didn't seem to know much about z/VM)

I did some more research.   z/VM was updated some time ago to deal with 
the unusual mix of 3880/3990/2107/2105 controller functionality on EMC 
devices.
But EMC TimeFinder/Snap, remains proprietary EMC technology that z/VM does 
not support for minidisks.

My only recommendation for sharing is to use the technique described on p. 
85 of the IOCP book (-08 level):
  When you are running VM with guest operating systems, you can use 
multiple
  CNTLUNIT statements for a single physical control unit in certain
  environments to effectively dedicate the same physical devices to more
  than one guest. This technique involves potential path-grouping 
considerations
  that create operational complications. Ensure you have determined 
possible
  consequences and that you use caution if employing this technique.

If EMC told the customer that they can create MDISKs (DEVNO or otherwise) 
on TYPE UNSUPPORTED dasd, they were wrong. 

BTW, Snapshot is a function in the IBM RAMAC Virtual Array (RVA)

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: A Data Center near Tokyo Japan

2011-03-18 Thread Tom Huegel
I am not personally in Japan, those pictures are from a customers site.

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Gregg Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Gribbin jeff.grib...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  All I can say is: wow. You guys got REALLY lucky.
 
  What's that old saying about, 'The harder I work the luckier I get'?
 
  It looks to me as though IBM engineers really, 'lucky' equipment. g
 

 Hello!
 Second the motion!
 Tom, I wish you well over where you are.

 --
 -
 Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
 This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again.



Distinguishing Duplicate VTAM Minor Nodes

2011-03-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
I have the same minor nodes OM22VTAM under 2 different MAJORNODES, 
A22OMMVS and A22KOOM1.

The first MAJORNODE that is varied active activates the minor node and the 
other minor node gets a STATUS of RESET.

If I then want to flip them so that the ACTIVE one becomes RESET and the 
RESET one becomes ACTIVE can I do it individually or do I need to VARY the 
whole MAJORNODEs INACT and ACT.

IOW is there a way of qualifying the VARY command with the MAJORNODE name.

VARY command update?

2011-03-18 Thread Marcy Cortes
Happened to watch operations today in a disaster test...

Typing vary on proc 01   vary on proc 02...
Is a bit tedious when you've got more than a handful.

How about a VARY ON PROC ALL ?

(Yes, I gave him a pipe command and yes we can do this in an exec), but it 
would be nice if the CP command could do this.  Then they can look it up in the 
IBM doc.



Marcy 


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


Re: VARY command update?

2011-03-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
Is there a PIPE for Dummies book somewhere?

It seems to be a universal panacea and people, like Marcy here, just 
magically pluck these things out of thin air as though it were common 
knowledge.

Where are the cheat sheets?





Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
03/18/2011 05:16 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
VARY command update?






Happened to watch operations today in a disaster test...

Typing vary on proc 01   vary on proc 02...
Is a bit tedious when you've got more than a handful.

How about a VARY ON PROC ALL ?

(Yes, I gave him a pipe command and yes we can do this in an exec), but it 
would be nice if the CP command could do this.  Then they can look it up 
in the IBM doc.



Marcy 


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, 
you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message 
or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, 
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this 
message. Thank you for your cooperation.



Re: VARY command update?

2011-03-18 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 03/18/2011 at 05:20 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 Is there a PIPE for Dummies book somewhere? 
 
 It seems to be a universal panacea and people, like Marcy here, just 
magically 
 pluck these things out of thin air as though it were common knowledge. 

Though they existed long before, they have been in the VM product since 
CMS Level 7 or 8, IIRC.  We're up to level 25 now. 
 
 Where are the cheat sheets? 

http://www.vm.ibm.com/pipelines/

Start with Will Roden's Pipelines online tutorials.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: VARY command update?

2011-03-18 Thread James Laing - Hotmail
In my experience - the best way to learn pipes - is to trawl any and all execs 
that you can find and look at how they use pipes to solve problems. For me - I 
do not know about anyone else - but I had to adopt a new way of looking at the 
problem - like writing assembler - an atomic approach to solving a problem by 
the incremental refinement step by step - until I got the output I wanted. 
Sometimes I found developing a pipe very tiresome - but once you get used to 
the idea that within a pipe you can arrange the input data to suit your needs 
(or indeed a format needed so that it complies with the selection/operation 
by/on/of a builtin stage - any way you like) - operate on it and output what 
you need - then it becomes a second to none tool that I got hooked on.


From: George Henke/NYLIC 
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 9:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
Subject: Re: VARY command update?


Is there a PIPE for Dummies book somewhere? 

It seems to be a universal panacea and people, like Marcy here, just magically 
pluck these things out of thin air as though it were common knowledge. 

Where are the cheat sheets? 




  Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com 
  Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
  03/18/2011 05:16 PM Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 


 To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU  
cc  
Subject VARY command update? 



 



Happened to watch operations today in a disaster test...

Typing vary on proc 01   vary on proc 02...
Is a bit tedious when you've got more than a handful.

How about a VARY ON PROC ALL ?

(Yes, I gave him a pipe command and yes we can do this in an exec), but it 
would be nice if the CP command could do this.  Then they can look it up in the 
IBM doc.



Marcy 


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.



Re: VARY command update?

2011-03-18 Thread Marcy Cortes
I've been around VM 25 years.  I started when I was 6 obviously ;)

pipe cp q proc | spec /vary on proc/ 1 w2 nw | cp

Obvious, huh ?

Yeah, I'm sure the operator thought I was speaking greek too.

They really do try to be very self sufficient and not bug the systems staff for 
commands.  I appreciate that.
But they aren't programmers or plumbers.



Marcy 


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VARY command update?

Is there a PIPE for Dummies book somewhere? 

It seems to be a universal panacea and people, like Marcy here, just magically 
pluck these things out of thin air as though it were common knowledge. 

Where are the cheat sheets? 



Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
03/18/2011 05:16 PM 
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
cc

Subject
VARY command update?







Happened to watch operations today in a disaster test...

Typing vary on proc 01   vary on proc 02...    
Is a bit tedious when you've got more than a handful.

How about a VARY ON PROC ALL ?

(Yes, I gave him a pipe command and yes we can do this in an exec), but it 
would be nice if the CP command could do this.  Then they can look it up in the 
IBM doc.



Marcy 


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


Re: Distinguishing Duplicate VTAM Minor Nodes

2011-03-18 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 03/18/2011 at 02:27 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 I have the same minor nodes OM22VTAM under 2 different MAJORNODES, 
A22OMMVS and 
 A22KOOM1. 
 
 The first MAJORNODE that is varied active activates the minor node and 
the 
 other minor node gets a STATUS of RESET. 
 
 If I then want to flip them so that the ACTIVE one becomes RESET and the 
RESET 
 one becomes ACTIVE can I do it individually or do I need to VARY the 
whole 
 MAJORNODEs INACT and ACT. 
 
 IOW is there a way of qualifying the VARY command with the MAJORNODE 
name.

A VTAM question on IBMVM?  Since before your sun burned hot in space, I 
have awaited a VTAM question on IBMVM. 

Too bad I can't answer it.  VTAM has the strange and wonderful UPDATE= and 
SCOPE= operands.  I know that UPDATE= is capable of changing some of the 
settings of an active node.  I presume your use of the same minor node in 
two different major nodes is because they have different settings in each 
one.

The folks on IBM-MAIN probably have a better answer.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: Distinguishing Duplicate VTAM Minor Nodes

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Smrcina

On 03/18/2011 04:59 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:


A VTAM question on IBMVM?  Since before your sun burned hot in space, I
have awaited a VTAM question on IBMVM.


Now that's funny!

--
Rich Smrcina
Velocity Software, Inc.
http://www.velocitysoftware.com

Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2011 - April 15-19, 2011 Colorado Springs, CO


Re: A Data Center near Tokyo Japan

2011-03-18 Thread Gregg Levine
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am not personally in Japan, those pictures are from a customers site.

 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Gregg Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Gribbin jeff.grib...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  All I can say is: wow. You guys got REALLY lucky.
 
  What's that old saying about, 'The harder I work the luckier I get'?
 
  It looks to me as though IBM engineers really, 'lucky' equipment. g
 

 Hello!
 Second the motion!
 Tom, I wish you well over where you are.


Hello!
Oh okay. Pardon me. Pass that along to your customer then.

-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again.


Re: Distinguishing Duplicate VTAM Minor Nodes

2011-03-18 Thread David L. Craig
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 A VTAM question on IBMVM?  Since before your sun burned hot in space, I
 have awaited a VTAM question on IBMVM.

I do not believe even Chuckie is that old. :-)


Re: Distinguishing Duplicate VTAM Minor Nodes

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Smrcina

On 03/18/2011 06:23 PM, David L. Craig wrote:

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Alan Altmarkalan_altm...@us.ibm.com  wrote:

A VTAM question on IBMVM?  Since before your sun burned hot in space, I
have awaited a VTAM question on IBMVM.

I do not believe even Chuckie is that old. :-)




But if he's been visiting the Guardian of Forever he is timeless.

Hide, the moderator is looking!!

--
Rich Smrcina
Velocity Software, Inc.
http://www.velocitysoftware.com

Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2011 - April 15-19, 2011 Colorado Springs, CO