Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-21 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 09:11 EDT, gclo...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> Robert, 
> I normally test it manually: 
> Logon MAINT (at Z10) 
> DIRM USER WITHPASS 
> DIRECTXA USER WITHPASS 
> 
> If something goes wrong, change it: 
> Note: $DIRCTL$ is a pseudo user for Directory statements. 
> 
> DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ GET 
> CP Q CPUID 
> XEdit $DIRCTL$ DIRECT (and update)
> DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ REPlace

Just use the DIRM DIRECTORY command.  It's easier, quicker, and less prone 
to error.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-21 Thread gclovis
Robert,
I normally test it manually:
Logon MAINT (at Z10)
DIRM USER WITHPASS
DIRECTXA USER WITHPASS

If something goes wrong, change it: 
Note: $DIRCTL$ is a pseudo user for Directory statements.

DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ GET
CP Q CPUID
XEdit $DIRCTL$ DIRECT (and update)
DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ REPlace

__
Clovis 



From:
RPN01 
To:
IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
Date:
20/03/2011 06:47
Subject:
Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System 



We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint satellite 
on it won’t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no 
DIRECTORY statement which matches the serial and model number, and then 
has the serial and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial and 
model and copied it into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which actually 
matched what I had there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was right). I 
tried direct again, and it still says the same thing.

The old statement for our z9 was:

DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY


And I replaced it with the following for the z10:

DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY

What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?

-- 
Robert P. Nix  Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844   Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
-^^-^^
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
 in practice, theory and practice are different."





Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-21 Thread RPN01
Since I came in this morning and it has "magically" repaired itself, I think
that this may indeed be the problem. I'll go in and turn off caching on the
shared disks today so as to avoid this issue next weekend when we install
our second z10.

Thanks.

-- 
Robert P. Nix  Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844   Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
-^^-^^
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
 in practice, theory and practice are different."



On 3/20/11 9:19 AM, "Alan Altmark"  wrote:

> On Sunday, 03/20/2011 at 05:53 EDT, RPN01  wrote:
>> We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint
> satellite on 
>> it won?t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no
> DIRECTORY 
>> statement which matches the serial and model number, and then has the
> serial 
>> and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial and model and
> copied it 
>> into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which actually matched what I
> had 
>> there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was right). I tried direct again,
> and it 
>> still says the same thing.
>> 
>> The old statement for our z9 was:
>> 
>> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY
>> 
>> 
>> And I replaced it with the following for the z10:
>> 
>> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY
>> 
>> What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?
> 
> My guess is that you forgot to turn off minidisk cache for the shared
> disks on the satellite system and you're not seeing the directory update.
> I had that problem a couple of weeks ago.  I couldn't figure it out until
> I linked to the DIRMAINT 1DF on the satellite system and noticed that the
> file content didn't match the primary system.  (slap forehead)
> 
> I suggested to one of the developers that satellites should turn off MDC
> for all config and db disks if their partner DIRMAINT server is on a
> different system.
> 
> Alan Altmark
> 
> z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
> IBM System Lab Services and Training
> ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
> office: 607.429.3323
> mobile; 607.321.7556
> alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
> IBM Endicott


Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 03/20/2011 at 05:53 EDT, RPN01  wrote:
> We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint 
satellite on 
> it won?t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no 
DIRECTORY 
> statement which matches the serial and model number, and then has the 
serial 
> and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial and model and 
copied it 
> into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which actually matched what I 
had 
> there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was right). I tried direct again, 
and it 
> still says the same thing.
> 
> The old statement for our z9 was:
> 
> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY
> 
> 
> And I replaced it with the following for the z10:
> 
> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY
> 
> What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?

My guess is that you forgot to turn off minidisk cache for the shared 
disks on the satellite system and you're not seeing the directory update. 
I had that problem a couple of weeks ago.  I couldn't figure it out until 
I linked to the DIRMAINT 1DF on the satellite system and noticed that the 
file content didn't match the primary system.  (slap forehead)

I suggested to one of the developers that satellites should turn off MDC 
for all config and db disks if their partner DIRMAINT server is on a 
different system.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-20 Thread Scott Rohling
I recall using SET CPUID (command or directory) to make yourself immune to
the system CPUID changing..

- Set the DIRMAINT guests (DIRMAINT/DIRMSAT/DATAMOVE) to a simple CPUID
number (e.g. 1)
- Use the CPUID in the directory (1)
- Use different numbers if you need to distinguish between systems (2,
etc) -- DIRMSAT machines only -- everyone else can stay 1 in the
complex.

I tried this a long time ago and it worked fine - but others were
uncomfortable with 'hiding' the real CPUID... I can't recall the objections
now.

You can also play games with CPUID to make SYSTEM NETID immune ..  (1 is
always MYVM1, 2 is MYVM2, etc).

I think setting CPUID (making it truly virtual) can be a useful method in
the right circumstances

(sorry - perhaps not germane to Robert's problem (though it may be a future
strategy?)  - but Kris's comment on the CPUID got me thinking about it
again)

Scott Rohling


On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Kris Buelens wrote:

> You've got the model from Q CPUID?  (a z10 BC is a 2098, an EC is a 2097)
> No hex 41 somewhere?  SET OUTPUT 41 _  can make those visible.
> The DIRMSAT has no CPUID statement in its directory entry?  So CP FOR
> DIRMSAT CMD Q CPUID can help.
>
>
> 2011/3/20 RPN01 
>
>>  We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint
>> satellite on it won’t install a directory. The message I get says that there
>> is no DIRECTORY statement which matches the serial and model number, and
>> then has the serial and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial
>> and model and copied it into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which
>> actually matched what I had there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was
>> right). I tried direct again, and it still says the same thing.
>>
>> The old statement for our z9 was:
>>
>> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY
>>
>>
>> And I replaced it with the following for the z10:
>>
>> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY
>>
>> What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?
>>
>> --
>> Robert P. Nix  Mayo Foundation.~.
>> RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
>> 507-284-0844   Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
>> -^^-^^
>> "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
>>  in practice, theory and practice are different."
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kris Buelens,
> IBM Belgium, VM customer support
>


Re: Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-20 Thread Kris Buelens
You've got the model from Q CPUID?  (a z10 BC is a 2098, an EC is a 2097)
No hex 41 somewhere?  SET OUTPUT 41 _  can make those visible.
The DIRMSAT has no CPUID statement in its directory entry?  So CP FOR
DIRMSAT CMD Q CPUID can help.

2011/3/20 RPN01 

>  We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint
> satellite on it won’t install a directory. The message I get says that there
> is no DIRECTORY statement which matches the serial and model number, and
> then has the serial and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial
> and model and copied it into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which
> actually matched what I had there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was
> right). I tried direct again, and it still says the same thing.
>
> The old statement for our z9 was:
>
> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY
>
>
> And I replaced it with the following for the z10:
>
> DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY
>
> What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?
>
> --
> Robert P. Nix  Mayo Foundation.~.
> RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
> 507-284-0844   Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
> -^^-^^
> "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
>  in practice, theory and practice are different."
>
>


-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Anyone using Dirmaint with a z10?

2011-03-20 Thread RPN01
We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint satellite
on it won¹t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no
DIRECTORY statement which matches the serial and model number, and then has
the serial and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial and model
and copied it into a directory statement in Dirmaint (which actually matched
what I had there, but hey, I wanted to be sure it was right). I tried direct
again, and it still says the same thing.

The old statement for our z9 was:

DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 025A7E-2094 GRIZZLY


And I replaced it with the following for the z10:

DIRECTORY 0123 3390 54GRES 0123 02B3E6-2097 GRIZZLY

What small gem of wisdom am I missing here?

-- 
Robert P. Nix  Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844   Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
-^^-^^
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
 in practice, theory and practice are different."