Re: BFS problem
Jim, are the entries in lowercase as noted? In this case it matter. GNAME must match POSIXGROUP, both in lowercase. Regards, Clovis. From: Jim Bohnsack To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 06/08/2010 13:50 Subject:Re: BFS problem Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System Michael---All the POSIXGROUP statements that you listed are there as you listed them. The USER id's that you listed are there, but some of them have POSIXINFO statements with a different UID number. USER DAEMON has UID 1 rather than UID 2 USER ADM had UID 4 rather than UID 3 I don't remember changing them, but if they make a difference, I can change them to what you said. Jim On 8/5/2010 11:43 AM, Michael Donovan wrote: > --1__=0ABBFDE5DFC584808f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDE5DFC58480 > Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable > > > Jim, > > To continue with Rick Troth's note ... make sure the following statemen= > ts > exist in your CP directory > > ---= > - >GLOBALDEFS >POSIXGROUP system 0 >POSIXGROUP staff1 >POSIXGROUP bin 2 >POSIXGROUP sys 3 >POSIXGROUP adm 4 >POSIXGROUP mail 6 >POSIXGROUP security 7 >POSIXGROUP nobody 4294967294 >* >USER ROOT NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 0 GNAME system >* >USER DAEMON NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME staff >* >USER BIN NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME bin >* >USER SYS NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME sys >* >USER ADM NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME adm >* >USER NOBODY NOLOG 32M 128M G > POSIXINFO UID 4294967294 GNAME nobody > ---= > --- > > > These entries are all shipped in the default CP directory, but maybe th= > ey > were removed or commented out in yours? If they are present and you ha= > ve > an ESM running, then you need to do what Alan Altmark described in his > post. > > Cheers! > Mike Donovan > > > > = > >From: Jim Bohnsack = > > = > >To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU = > > = > >Date: 08/05/2010 11:12 AM = > > = > >Subject:BFS problem = > > = > >Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System = > > = > > > > > > > I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM= > > 5.4, and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP,= > I'm > seeing a BFS error for
Re: BFS problem
Michael---All the POSIXGROUP statements that you listed are there as you listed them. The USER id's that you listed are there, but some of them have POSIXINFO statements with a different UID number. USER DAEMON has UID 1 rather than UID 2 USER ADM had UID 4 rather than UID 3 I don't remember changing them, but if they make a difference, I can change them to what you said. Jim On 8/5/2010 11:43 AM, Michael Donovan wrote: --1__=0ABBFDE5DFC584808f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDE5DFC58480 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Jim, To continue with Rick Troth's note ... make sure the following statemen= ts exist in your CP directory ---= - GLOBALDEFS POSIXGROUP system 0 POSIXGROUP staff1 POSIXGROUP bin 2 POSIXGROUP sys 3 POSIXGROUP adm 4 POSIXGROUP mail 6 POSIXGROUP security 7 POSIXGROUP nobody 4294967294 * USER ROOT NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 0 GNAME system * USER DAEMON NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME staff * USER BIN NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME bin * USER SYS NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME sys * USER ADM NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME adm * USER NOBODY NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 4294967294 GNAME nobody ---= --- These entries are all shipped in the default CP directory, but maybe th= ey were removed or commented out in yours? If they are present and you ha= ve an ESM running, then you need to do what Alan Altmark described in his post. Cheers! Mike Donovan = From: Jim Bohnsack = = To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU = = Date: 08/05/2010 11:12 AM = = Subject:BFS problem = = Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System = = I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM= 5.4, and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP,= I'm seeing a BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP stateme= nts, and the LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from= IBM with 5.4. I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing started DTCPRD3018I No options in effect DTCPRD3040I Issuing command: VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM !VMF DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: 5VMTCP40%TCPIP DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. information... DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> RC=3D0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT / DMSOVO2129E GID not found for system ERROR: RC=3D32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system LDAPSRV DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC =3D 1 Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BF= S is an absolute mystery to me. Jim -- James Bohnsack (972) 596-6377 home/office (972) 342-5823 cell = --1__=0ABBFDE5DFC584808f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDE5DFC58480 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Jim, To continue with Rick Troth's note ... make sure the following statemen= ts exist in your CP directory ---= - GLOBALDEFS POSIXGROUP system 0 POSIXGROUP staff1 POSIXGROUP bin 2 POSIXGROUP sys 3 POSIXGROUP adm 4 POSIXGROUP mail 6 POSIXGROUP security 7 POSIXGROUP nobody 4294967294 * USER ROOT NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 0 GNAME system * USER DAEMON NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME staff * USER BIN NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME bin * USER SYS NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME sys * USER ADM NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME adm * USER NOBODY NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 4294967294 GNAME nobody ---= --- These entries are all shipped in the default CP di
Re: BFS problem
Jim, To continue with Rick Troth's note ... make sure the following statements exist in your CP directory GLOBALDEFS POSIXGROUP system 0 POSIXGROUP staff1 POSIXGROUP bin 2 POSIXGROUP sys 3 POSIXGROUP adm 4 POSIXGROUP mail 6 POSIXGROUP security 7 POSIXGROUP nobody 4294967294 * USER ROOT NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 0 GNAME system * USER DAEMON NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME staff * USER BIN NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 2 GNAME bin * USER SYS NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME sys * USER ADM NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 3 GNAME adm * USER NOBODY NOLOG 32M 128M G POSIXINFO UID 4294967294 GNAME nobody -- These entries are all shipped in the default CP directory, but maybe they were removed or commented out in yours? If they are present and you have an ESM running, then you need to do what Alan Altmark described in his post. Cheers! Mike Donovan From: Jim Bohnsack To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 08/05/2010 11:12 AM Subject: BFS problem Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM 5.4, and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP, I'm seeing a BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP statements, and the LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from IBM with 5.4. I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing started DTCPRD3018I No options in effect DTCPRD3040I Issuing command: VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM !VMF DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: 5VMTCP40%TCPIP DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. information... DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> RC=0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT / DMSOVO2129E GID not found for system ERROR: RC=32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system LDAPSRV DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC = 1 Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BFS is an absolute mystery to me. Jim -- James Bohnsack (972) 596-6377 home/office (972) 342-5823 cell
Re: BFS problem
The statements are the same, but does that mean that group "system" is in fact defined? Check for that group in your POSIXGROUP statements. The DMSOVO2129E message says it's looking for a GID, the number behind the name. Forgive me if you already know this. A lot of VMers are still new to POSIX things like UID numbers and GID numbers and the very idea of putting them into the CP Directory. I think it was a brilliant stroke and very well implemented, though it took me some time to become fully indoctrinated with what the Endicott team had done. -- R; <>< On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:08, Jim Bohnsack wrote: > I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM 5.4, > and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP, I'm > seeing a BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP statements, > and the LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from IBM > with 5.4. I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: > > DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing > started > DTCPRD3018I No options in > effect > DTCPRD3040I Issuing > command: > VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM > !VMF > > DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: > 5VMTCP40%TCPIP > DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. > information... > DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: > > LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> > > RC=0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT > / > DMSOVO2129E GID not found for > system > ERROR: RC=32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system > LDAPSRV > DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC = 1 > > Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BFS is > an absolute mystery to me. > > Jim > > -- > James Bohnsack > (972) 596-6377 home/office > (972) 342-5823 cell
Re: BFS problem
On Thursday, 08/05/2010 at 11:08 EDT, Jim Bohnsack wrote: > I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM 5.4, > and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP, I'm seeing a > BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP statements, and the > LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from IBM with 5.4. > I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: > > DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing started > DTCPRD3018I No options in effect > DTCPRD3040I Issuing command: > VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM !VMF > > DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: 5VMTCP40%TCPIP > DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. information... > DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: > LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> > RC=0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT / > DMSOVO2129E GID not found for system > ERROR: RC=32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system LDAPSRV > DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC = 1 > > Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BFS is an > absolute mystery to me. Perhaps you have an ESM running and the ESM is in charge of posix stuff? E.g. in RACF, if you enable it to manage POSIX stuff by coding the ICHNGMAX macro in HCPRWA, you have to 'ADDGROUP system' with an OVM segment that has GID 0. (And that would have been done for you when you ran RPIDIRCT at enablement time.) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
BFS problem
I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM 5.4, and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP, I'm seeing a BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP statements, and the LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from IBM with 5.4. I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing started DTCPRD3018I No options in effect DTCPRD3040I Issuing command: VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM !VMF DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: 5VMTCP40%TCPIP DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. information... DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> RC=0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT / DMSOVO2129E GID not found for system ERROR: RC=32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system LDAPSRV DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC = 1 Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BFS is an absolute mystery to me. Jim -- James Bohnsack (972) 596-6377 home/office (972) 342-5823 cell
