Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-28 Thread Kris Buelens

Note: SET OBSERVER and  SET SECUSER (i.e. SCIF) are mutually exclusive.

However: SET OBSERVER still sees linemode output when the primary user is
logged on; SET SECUSER only sees  them when the primary user is
disconnected.

Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-28 Thread Rob van der Heij

On 2/27/07, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
 considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on
 VM ?

Syslog can also log to local files/devices, which doesn't require a
external network connection to work. If you have SCIF active, log to
/dev/console. See man page for syslogd.conf for syntax.


Sure, that's what most of us do for a subset of the syslog traffic.
But the point I raised is that the driver of /dev/console does not
write lines as such but a stream of bytes. If SCIF captures that you
need to work to construct the original lines again. Let's share the
war stories of screen scraping 3270 data streams with HLLAPI and
friends.

Rob


Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-28 Thread David Boyes
 Sure, that's what most of us do for a subset of the syslog traffic.
 But the point I raised is that the driver of /dev/console does not
 write lines as such but a stream of bytes.

Unfortunately true. Syslog-ng is a little better behaved about that, but
not much. 

 Let's share the
 war stories of screen scraping 3270 data streams with HLLAPI and
 friends.

Ugh. I'd rather not. The therapy was expensive. 

-- db


TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
Since the z/Linux guests do not timestamp their VM console messages, I
am considering turning the TIMESTAMP ON.  We do have the SCIF to
VM:Operator but that can be time consuming when researching when
messages are issued.

Has anyone done this?   Other than for someone who does a LOGON to the
VM console can you see any problem with this?

Jim


If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Mike Walter
Jim,

Can you clarify:
We do have the SCIF to VM:Operator but that can be time consuming when 
researching when messages are issued. for me?

When scanning the VM:Operator syslog, each message is prefixed by the time 
it was issued (well... the time VM:Operator processed it, but that's 
pretty close enough), who issued it, and the IUCVclass in which it 
arrived.  If your guest is SCIFing to VM:Operator then the timestamp is 
there in the syslog.  But if you are logged onto the guest server, then 
due to SCIF design (unless you use SET OBSERVER ON?) VM:Operator no longer 
sees the messages until you disconnect again -- and while you are 
connected there are no timestamps without CP TERM TIMESTAMP ON.

I'm confused by your statement.

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.




Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/27/2007 08:20 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
TERM TIMESTAMP ON






Since the z/Linux guests do not timestamp their VM console messages, I
am considering turning the TIMESTAMP ON.  We do have the SCIF to
VM:Operator but that can be time consuming when researching when
messages are issued.

Has anyone done this?   Other than for someone who does a LOGON to the
VM console can you see any problem with this?

Jim


If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the 
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain 
or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to 
this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/





 
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient 
is strictly prohibited.


Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Rob van der Heij

On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Has anyone done this?   Other than for someone who does a LOGON to the
VM console can you see any problem with this?


Most lines of what comes on the Linux console is not single lines
output, and so CP is limited in what can be done. Like this:

18:44:05  INIT: version 2.82 booting
18:44:08 Running /etc/init.d/boot
Mounting /proc device
18:44:08 ..done
Mounting /dev/pts
18:44:08 ..done
18:44:13  Boot logging started on /dev/ttyS0(/dev/con
18:44:16 Enabling syn flood protection
18:44:16 ..done
Disabling IP forwarding..done
18:44:19 Setting up hostname 'lnx00c00'
18:44:19 ..done
18:44:19
18:44:19 Setting up NIS domainname 'home.rvdheij.com'
18:44:19 ..done
18:44:19
Setting up loopback interface
18:44:38 ..done
18:44:38

But SCIF output has similar problems, so you would at least need
something to break up the lines when SCIF picks them up.

I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on
VM ?  I could also see some value in an IUCV-based virtual console
driver for Linux (playing serial console through virtual CTC is not my
idea of having fun).

Rob


Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
Simply put:  I want to know if turning it on will hurt anything.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON


On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone done this?   Other than for someone who does a LOGON to the
 VM console can you see any problem with this?

Most lines of what comes on the Linux console is not single lines
output, and so CP is limited in what can be done. Like this:

18:44:05  INIT: version 2.82 booting
18:44:08 Running /etc/init.d/boot
Mounting /proc device
18:44:08 ..done
Mounting /dev/pts
18:44:08 ..done
18:44:13  Boot logging started on /dev/ttyS0(/dev/con
18:44:16 Enabling syn flood protection
18:44:16 ..done
Disabling IP forwarding..done
18:44:19 Setting up hostname 'lnx00c00'
18:44:19 ..done
18:44:19
18:44:19 Setting up NIS domainname 'home.rvdheij.com'
18:44:19 ..done
18:44:19
Setting up loopback interface
18:44:38 ..done
18:44:38

But SCIF output has similar problems, so you would at least need
something to break up the lines when SCIF picks them up.

I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on VM
?  I could also see some value in an IUCV-based virtual console driver
for Linux (playing serial console through virtual CTC is not my idea of
having fun).

Rob


If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Rob van der Heij

On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Simply put:  I want to know if turning it on will hurt anything.


If your VM:Operator is supposed to act on some console output, having
the time stamp there sometimes will make the match fail. Apart from
that, the worst is that someone using the virtual console may get
confused by the output.

Rob


Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
I can live with confusion.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON


On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Simply put:  I want to know if turning it on will hurt anything.

If your VM:Operator is supposed to act on some console output, having
the time stamp there sometimes will make the match fail. Apart from
that, the worst is that someone using the virtual console may get
confused by the output.

Rob


If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON

2007-02-27 Thread David Boyes
 I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
 considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on
 VM ?  

Syslog can also log to local files/devices, which doesn't require a
external network connection to work. If you have SCIF active, log to
/dev/console. See man page for syslogd.conf for syntax.