Re: [fsug-tvm] Network devices disappears in Fedora 16

2011-12-04 Thread Syam
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Vishnupradeep
intermedia.vis...@gmail.comwrote:

 The network device disappears in my Fedora 16 installation.


Is it the 'p12p1' device that seems to be missing? You could have told us
instead of expecting us to compare your screenshots for differences!


 Attached two screenshot showing output of 'ifconfig' before and after
 network device missing*.


Again, when exactly does this happen? What were you doing when the device
disappeared?



 Tried to restart network service. I don't know if that solve problem. but
 tried and failed. 3rd image shows its output.
 Is there any way to restart the service needed for proper working
 of OS without restarting system.


While 'service network restart' should still work, here's the new (systemd)
way to do it:
systemctl restart network.service

You might also be interested in other actions apart from 'restart':
systemctl enable/start/stop/restart/status network.service


-- 
Regards,

Syam
sya...@gmail.com

-- 
Freedom is the only law. 
Freedom Unplugged
http://www.ilug-tvm.org

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups ilug-tvm group.
To control your subscription visit 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe
To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com



For details visit the google group page: 
http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en


Re: [fsug-tvm] Network devices disappears in Fedora 16

2011-12-04 Thread Vishnupradeep
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Syam sya...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Vishnupradeep intermedia.vis...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 The network device disappears in my Fedora 16 installation.


 Is it the 'p12p1' device that seems to be missing? You could have told us
 instead of expecting us to compare your screenshots for differences!

Yes p12p1 is the device.



 Attached two screenshot showing output of 'ifconfig' before and after
 network device missing*.


 Again, when exactly does this happen? What were you doing when the device
 disappeared?

I was watching move in vlc.




 Tried to restart network service. I don't know if that solve problem. but
 tried and failed. 3rd image shows its output.
 Is there any way to restart the service needed for proper working
 of OS without restarting system.


 While 'service network restart' should still work, here's the new
 (systemd) way to do it:
 systemctl restart network.service

 You might also be interested in other actions apart from 'restart':
 systemctl enable/start/stop/restart/status network.service


 --
 Regards,

 Syam
 sya...@gmail.com

 --
 Freedom is the only law.
 Freedom Unplugged
 http://www.ilug-tvm.org

 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups ilug-tvm group.
 To control your subscription visit
 http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe
 To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com



 For details visit the google group page:
 http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en


-- 
Freedom is the only law. 
Freedom Unplugged
http://www.ilug-tvm.org

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups ilug-tvm group.
To control your subscription visit 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe
To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com



For details visit the google group page: 
http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en


Re: [fsug-tvm] Single Data Partition. (GNU/Linux)

2011-12-04 Thread Arjun Suresh Raji
If you are using that system as a standalone and a primary backup machine.
This will do good provided you are not using any rolling release distros.

If you get screwed then you can keep the two halves. ;)
--
Arjun S R
http://about.me/arjunsr


On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 20:58, Dhananjay Balan mb.dhanan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hai,

 I have a computer with ~300 gigs of harddisk, where 30-50GB stores the OS.
 I was wondering if theres any problem with using the remaining space as
 single partion to store my entire data. has anyone done it before? What are
 the problems that can arise?


-- 
Freedom is the only law. 
Freedom Unplugged
http://www.ilug-tvm.org

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups ilug-tvm group.
To control your subscription visit 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe
To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com



For details visit the google group page: 
http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en


Re: [fsug-tvm] Single Data Partition. (GNU/Linux)

2011-12-04 Thread Arjun Suresh Raji
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 20:58, Dhananjay Balan mb.dhanan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hai,

 I have a computer with ~300 gigs of harddisk, where 30-50GB stores the OS.
 I was wondering if theres any problem with using the remaining space as
 single partion to store my entire data. has anyone done it before? What are
 the problems that can arise?


@Dj,
Oh! Discard my previous mail. [assumed that you wanted to use the /
completely for data]

I don't really think it can increase the performance. I think its better to
classify and partition the volumes appropriately by considering on what all
partition there will be frequent writes and on what all partitions only
frequent read is done.

Eg: Movies,tutorial and stuffs like that can be stored in a volume as it
has frequent read but occasional writes.
and codes, document preparation, personal auditing on various stuffs,
mails, can be partitioned in a separate volume as it has frequent writes
and read.

To get enough performance you can tweak the file system mount flags like
noatime on frequent read only volumes and many others are there. Also you
can use resiserfs on /var filesystem as it faster and efficient that ext*
filesystems on small files. There are many minor over-killing stuffs like
that. ;)

If performance is not that important, you can neglect the above said
suggestions.
--
Arjun S R
http://about.me/arjunsr

-- 
Freedom is the only law. 
Freedom Unplugged
http://www.ilug-tvm.org

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups ilug-tvm group.
To control your subscription visit 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe
To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com



For details visit the google group page: 
http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en