[ilugd] ILUG-D: Query
[Please CC replies to the original poster] Message from anand: Respected Sir/Mam I rate myself as a beginner to linux,and after the installation when i tried to bootit, at the loading the kernel in the memory the monitor gives an error that sync out of range so is there is any other way to load the kernel or to work on it, thru command line, so that i should be able to edit the monitor configuration,and to which file i should look for in which directory . looking forward for your reply,highly obliged if u solve my problem anand -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: document: 7 steps to software samadhi
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 11:43, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: LinuxLingam wrote: okay, let's have a show of hands, how many of you *really* use openoffice? (jumping with hands flying up!) .. I DO! I DO! We ( yes about 35 users) do! Most friendly software suite till date so that I could convert all our users to OO. -- Sudev Barar Learning Linux ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] New resource - Best Source of GNU?Linux cds at your doorstep
Resource ID: 67 Title: Best Source of GNU?Linux cds at your doorstep Category: Operating System URL: http://www.gnuindia.org Contact: Kaushal Bhandu Description: Dear sir I have almost all new distros and i keep it updating... Kindly see http://www.gnuindia.org for more details... Regards kaushal Bhandu Inform when comment is added: ON Inform when resource is rated: ON - Submitted by Kaushal Bhandankar on 11/03/2003. -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] New resource - Best Source of GNU/Linux cds at your doorstep
Resource ID: 68 Title: Best Source of GNU/Linux cds at your doorstep Category: Operating System URL: http://www.gnuindia.org Contact: Kaushal Bhandu Description: Dear sir I have almost all new distros and i keep it updating... Kindly see http://www.gnuindia.org for more details... Regards kaushal Bhandu Inform when comment is added: ON Inform when resource is rated: ON - Submitted by Kaushal Bhandankar on 11/03/2003. -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUG-D: Query
try linux lowres at the boot promt. shuld work. arvind On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Please CC replies to the original poster] Message from anand: Respected Sir/Mam I rate myself as a beginner to linux,and after the installation when i tried to bootit, at the loading the kernel in the memory the monitor gives an error that sync out of range so is there is any other way to load the kernel or to work on it, thru command line, so that i should be able to edit the monitor configuration,and to which file i should look for in which directory . looking forward for your reply,highly obliged if u solve my problem anand -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] ILUG-D: Contact Us:Linux for Mac
[Please CC the original poster] Message from Dr. Vikas Thanvi: I'm intrested in installing Linux on my iMac. I'm currently using Mac OS 9.2.2 and OS X(10.1.5) Please inform as how can I migrate. -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] ILUG-D: Need help for Wipro Cobol on Sco Unix
[Please CC the original poster] Message from Mohan Shah: Is any one from Linux User group can provide us the Wipro cobol Software. Pl contact on 011-32008268 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This email is brought to you by http://www.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] DVD player
father's got a samsung dvd player - working fine in linux!! No setup necessary. Arvind At 06:00 PM 11/3/2003 +0530, you wrote: Any inputs into which DVD ROM works with Linux? Sorry for trying to mooch information like this but I have a free VD offer that I need to grab or -- Sudev Barar Learning Linux ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUG-D: Query
--- Arvind Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: try linux lowres at the boot promt. shuld work. arvind Or try vga=normal at boot prompt. You also could have it in your lilo.conf file. -- narsingh Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] DVD player
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 18:00, Sudev Barar wrote: Any inputs into which DVD ROM works with Linux? Sorry for trying to mooch information like this but I have a free VD offer that I need to grab or pioneer works, but then am sure all models of dvd players work fine. even dvd-burners are well supported. LL ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUG-D: Query
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 20:48, Narsingh Sahu wrote: --- Arvind Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: try linux lowres at the boot promt. shuld work. arvind Or try vga=normal at boot prompt. The original poster had said that he was a newbie to Linux. I do no think he would know how to pass arguments at boot time (also he has not specified his boot loader). You also could have it in your lilo.conf file. Moreover, IMHO he would not know the the location of the lilo.conf file (it resides in /etc/lilo.conf). Also, I think he will have to run lilo at command prompt so that the effect of the new lilo.conf file. It sometimes gets really maddening locating configuration files unless you know the Linux file system moderately well. The point I am trying to make is that instead of making off-the-cuff answers to questions from newbies, the more expert people should take time to put a bit more thought into the answers and tone (or dumb) down the answers so that newbies have less problem in understanding the answer. Pointers to man and info pages (with hints on how to invoke them) are also useful. -- / \__ (@\___Raj Shekhar / O My home : http://geocities.com/lunatech3007/ / (_/My blog : http://lunatech.journalspace.com/ /_/ U ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Re: [LIG] [Fwd: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning]
Distilled points: 1. Red hat linux 9 is the LAST redhat linux version. This version will be supported only till April next year. 2. Red hat will only sell its $$$ enterprise servers from now on. 3. Support for all Red Hat Linux versions till 8.0 will end on December 31st this year. People have been warning of this happening for quite some time and it finally happened. All those (like me) who were completely dependent on RHL will suddenly find themselves without a job from next year - how many Redhat Enterprize customers will you get in the SME in India right now with the current level of Linux popularity? The biggest selling point of Linux which has been till now is zero product cost (admit it or not) - those who can say that it is the strength and stability that matters to the customer are people who provide that level of Linux support - and these people cost a bomb with their services causing TCO to reach noticeable levels. Time to move over to Debian, and help make it more mass oriented and take the place which Red Hat once occupied. - Sandip Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: So will they push their open source efforts to Fedora, or will they concentrate on selling advanced server? Original Message Subject: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:32:25 -0500 From: Red Hat Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for being a Red Hat Network customer. This e-mail provides you with important information about the upcoming discontinuation of Red Hat Linux, and resources to assist you with your migration to another Red Hat solution. As previously communicated, Red Hat will discontinue maintenance and errata support for Red Hat Linux 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.0 as of December 31, 2003. Red Hat will discontinue maintenance and errata support for Red Hat Linux 9 as of April 30, 2004. Red Hat does not plan to release another product in the Red Hat Linux line. With the recent announcement of Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.3, you'll find migrating to Enterprise Linux appealing. We understand that transitioning to another Red Hat solution requires careful planning and implementation. We have created a migration plan for Red Hat Network customers to help make the transition as simple and seamless as possible. Details: If you purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS or ES Basic before February 28, 2004, you will receive 50% off the price for two years.[*] (That's two years for the price of one.) In addition, we have created a Red Hat Linux Migration Resource Center to address your migration planning and other questions, such as: * What are best practices for implementing the migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux? * Are there other migration alternatives? * How do I purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS or ES Basic at the price above? * What if my paid subscription to RHN extends past April 30, 2004? Find out more about your migration options with product comparisons, whitepapers and documentation at the Red Hat Linux Migration Resource Center: http://www.redhat.com/solutions/migration/rhl/rhn Or read the FAQ written especially for Red Hat Network customers: https://rhn.redhat.com/help/rhlmigrationfaq/ Sincerely, Red Hat, Inc. [*] Limit 10 units. Higher volume purchase inquiries should contact a regional Red Hat sales representative. Contact numbers available at http://www.redhat.com/solutions/migration/rhl/rhn --the Red Hat Network Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Linux-india-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-general -- Sandip Bhattacharyahttp://www.sandipb.net sandip at puroga.com Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. http://www.puroga.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
LinuxLingam wrote: or is there something else that needs to be done? ?? Whic app are you trying to compile, LL? Is it compiled using GNU ./configure? If your libsigc++ library files are installed in /usr/local/ and the actual library files are installed in /usr/local/lib Then, try this command while compiling the *dependent* app: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ./configure ... (Yes. All on the same line and with spaces exactly as I had given.) - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharyahttp://www.sandipb.net sandip at puroga.com Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. http://www.puroga.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
try this command while compiling the *dependent* app: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ./configure ... (Yes. All on the same line and with spaces exactly as I had given.) - Sandip thanks sandip, but the app i'm trying to install that is dependent on libsigc is in an rpm form, so the above won't work. the app is also too huge to compile and make etc, and a bit tricky, from the documentation. ?? LL ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] GRUB fails to load FreeBSD beyond 70GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am not being able to boot into FreeBSD 5.1 with GRUB. I have an 80 GB Seagate Barracuda HDD with Debian (sid), Red Hat 8.0 and 9 installed. Grub's installed in the MBR and my /boot (where GRUB is located) is /dev/hda5 (within 8.3 GB though I have an Asus A7VE motherboard with a comparatively new BIOS). I boot around 8 different linux kernels with grub and they all load fine. Even kernels beyond 60 GB are loaded without any problem from ext3 partitions. (my debian /boot is beyond 60GB). Now I have a FreeBSD slice (hda3) beyond 72 GB. The problem is that my kernel doesn't boot from it. I have tried all possibilities but have reached no solution as yet. From the GRUB command-line during boot, when I do root (hd0,14), grub says partition is unknown type but gives the correct hex value. Seems it is not being able to recognize the UFS partition. After that the boot command fails. Interestingly the same version of GRUB boots my FreeBSD installation from a 40 GB Seagate HDD connected as primary slave. It boots without any problems. Here the same version of grub shows the correct partition type. I am wondering whether grub fails to recognize UFS partitions beyond 60-70 GB. Is this a known issue with grub? Does anyone have any solutions? Regards, Bhaskar. - -- - --- Bhaskar Dutta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = AA56 1EB5 D7E8 DD9C 298E 8F4D 375F D416 01D5 671C - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/psJAN1/UFgHVZxwRAn+PAKCQfzwY2MnRPiEYMo83pTmtgoevqQCfZaos 9kw63lAllf5i9yBamcYyFlk= =fNDg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: Re: [ilugd] Re: Apache/2.0.40 problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # ./DDoS 68.56.176.39 :) On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 Yashpal Nagar wrote : access_log contains:- ### . . 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:15 +051800] GET /scripts/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:15 +051800] GET /MSADC/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:16 +051800] GET /c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:17 +051800] GET /d/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:17 +051800] GET /scripts/..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:18 +051800] GET /_vti_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:18 +051800] GET /_mem_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:19 +051800] GET /msadc/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c/..%c1%1c../..%c1%1c../..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:20 +051800] GET /scripts/..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - . . .## I think my server is being tried for hacking ? What to do now. Should i forward such request to M$ which we did at one pt of time.:) /yash On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 20:39, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Yashpal Nagar wrote: Dear team, I have one web server with no site hosted on it. I just use it for smokeping latency check. But for the last few days i am seeing in error_log [Sat Nov 01 17:52:00 2003] [error] [client 210.174.164.7] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:52:06 2003] [error] [client 65.138.121.92] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:53:16 2003] [error] [client 12.209.185.230] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:53:25 2003] [error] [client 67.38.12.57] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:55:28 2003] [error] [client 66.233.76.187] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:57:20 2003] [error] [client 219.78.196.35] Directory What are the corresponding entries in access_log? - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharyahttp://www.sandipb.net sandip at puroga.com Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. http://www.puroga.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
In that case the ldconfig way described by Arindam should have worked. Try running ldconfig in verbose mode( with -v option) and see if the libc++ library is displayed: ldconfig -v | grep sigc did this, here's the output: # ldconfig -v | grep sigc libsigc-1.2.so.5 - libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 libsigc-1.2.so.5 - libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 Also show us: 1. The exact RPM message which said libsigc++ was needed. # rpm -ivh k3d-0.2.5.4-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libsigc++ = 1.2 is needed by k3d-0.2.5.4-1 2. The list of files which has been installed in /usr/local/lib when you did make install while building libsigc++. this is under /usr/local/lib libsigc-1.2.a libsigc-1.2.la libsigc-1.2.so libsigc-1.2.so.5 libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 btw, i noticed something rather unusual, and tell me if this has something to do with the problem: i discovered a directory called /user/ (note the spelling 'user' and not 'usr') in this i discovered two sub-directories: include lib the contents of these directories as follows: # ls include sigc++-1.2 # ls lib libsigc-1.2.a libsigc-1.2.solibsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 sigc++-1.2 libsigc-1.2.la libsigc-1.2.so.5 pkgconfig wonder where all this came from, could it have been a typo by the developer who made the scripts for compiling libsigc++, or is this by design? ?? LL ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 04 November 2003 02:36 am, LinuxLingam wrote: # rpm -ivh k3d-0.2.5.4-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libsigc++ = 1.2 is needed by k3d-0.2.5.4-1 btw, i noticed something rather unusual, and tell me if this has something to do with the problem: i discovered a directory called /user/ (note the spelling 'user' and not 'usr') in this i discovered two sub-directories: include lib the contents of these directories as follows: # ls include sigc++-1.2 # ls lib libsigc-1.2.a libsigc-1.2.solibsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 sigc++-1.2 libsigc-1.2.la libsigc-1.2.so.5 pkgconfig wonder where all this came from, could it have been a typo by the developer who made the scripts for compiling libsigc++, or is this by design? AFAIK this has to be a typo (or maybe some app actually looks there for the libs !!) I have compiled the sources of libsigc++ but haven't encountered this before. i.e. haven't seen /user directory in my filesystem. Did you at any point of time compile the sources by passing --libdir=/user or --includedir=/user ? (dont think so) or maybe edit the Makefile generated by configure and change prefix=/usr/local to prefix=/user ??? Anyways a suggestion to install the rogue rpm for k3d: try setting the library path to /usr/local/lib by doing this: # export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib Then install the rpm. Maybe that would work. Otherwise why don't you create an rpm (the spec file is included in the sources of libsigc++) and install it and see what happens. Regards, Bhaskar. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ptIaN1/UFgHVZxwRAm6sAJ9shlfYA3rbJbs7X31KCCDeHCvb+gCfc2Rz GbKLprKaNVbByxjU1PR90TY= =yUoL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUG-D: Query
Anand, try the text based os selection (use cntrl-x to shift from the graphical to text. this may vary with the installation). type 'linux xvrefresh=60' (the number denotes the refresh rate of your screen which is usually the defaulting parameter in this kinda error. if you know your screen refresh rate substitute the same) i think you should be good to go. have fun Anuj Sharma _ Nutrition is in! Junk food is out! http://server1.msn.co.in/features/fabmall/ Be a part of the microwave revolution. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 05:06, LinuxLingam wrote: In that case the ldconfig way described by Arindam should have worked. Try running ldconfig in verbose mode( with -v option) and see if the libc++ library is displayed: ldconfig -v | grep sigc did this, here's the output: # ldconfig -v | grep sigc libsigc-1.2.so.5 - libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 libsigc-1.2.so.5 - libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 Also show us: 1. The exact RPM message which said libsigc++ was needed. # rpm -ivh k3d-0.2.5.4-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libsigc++ = 1.2 is needed by k3d-0.2.5.4-1 AFAIK this message is popping up because when you are trying to install the k3d rpm it is just querying the rpmdb to check whether you have libsigc installed or not. Now you have two options.. The second one I feel is easier...and will maintain your system in a nice rpmey fashion 1)Compile k3d from source and the ./configure script of that will pick up the libsig in your pc. You may have to pass the LDFLAGS=-L/usr/*** option mentioned by Sandip. To do this you may also use the *.spec file in the k3d source tree if it is there.So you can do rpmbuild -ta k3d***.tar.gz. Not too sure about this though whether the spec file is there in the k3d source tree??? 2) OK just for ya I compiled the libsig from source and then installed. using ./configure make make install. After this I did updatedb and then ran locate libsig on my system. Surprisingly it DID NOT find anything like that the user dir dunno why. Maybe you have played around with the makefile or passed some other options to it during make install [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]# locate user | grep libsig /home/dey/Download/libsigc++-1.2.5/doc/powerusers The above is the ONLY output I got. After doing this method of install I then did an rpmbuild -ta on the libsig source tar.gz. Created the RPM and then did an rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPM/i386/libsigc++-1.2.5-1.i386.rpm The RPM installed without any problems . So go ahead follow the RPM route and then try and install k3d from RPM everything should be fine. 2. The list of files which has been installed in /usr/local/lib when you did make install while building libsigc++. this is under /usr/local/lib libsigc-1.2.a libsigc-1.2.la libsigc-1.2.so libsigc-1.2.so.5 libsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 btw, i noticed something rather unusual, and tell me if this has something to do with the problem: i discovered a directory called /user/ (note the spelling 'user' and not 'usr') in this i discovered two sub-directories: include lib the contents of these directories as follows: # ls include sigc++-1.2 # ls lib libsigc-1.2.a libsigc-1.2.solibsigc-1.2.so.5.0.5 sigc++-1.2 libsigc-1.2.la libsigc-1.2.so.5 pkgconfig wonder where all this came from, could it have been a typo by the developer who made the scripts for compiling libsigc++, or is this by design? ?? LL ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd -- Arindam Dey The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled. GPG FPR: B8E3 219E F129 F970 F4A7 BC50 9636 504A BEDF 5739 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sandip LinuxLingam wrote: thanks sandip, but the app i'm trying to install that is dependent on libsigc is in an rpm form, so the above won't work. the app is also too huge to compile and make etc, and a bit tricky, from the documentation. Sandip In that case the ldconfig way described by Arindam should Sandip have worked. Try running ldconfig in verbose mode( with -v Sandip option) and see if the libc++ library is displayed: Sandip ldconfig -v | grep sigc Sandip Also show us: 1. The exact RPM message which said Sandip libsigc++ was needed. 2. The list of files which has been Sandip installed in /usr/local/lib when you did make install Sandip while building libsigc++. Nah, if he's trying to install an RPM the rpm program won't allow him to install due to missing dependencies. Remember, RPM will look for dependencies in the RPM database, not on the filesystem. Good lord, I'm reminding an RHCE! *g,dr* LL, you're left with two options: 1. Remove the compiled-from-source libsigc++ that you have installed and install the libsigc++ rpm instead. You problem would be fixed. This is the preferred way. 2. Install your package with rpm --nodeps ... so that it ignores the fact that the libsigc++ rpm is not present. It may or may not work after that. Deprecated anyway. Regards, - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard http://www.gnupg.org/ iD8DBQE/pxx+yWjQ78xo0X8RAtgXAJ0Utk8EKHuGR+53bKMVyPj4lDa07ACbBt77 MmAIIoCuE8s32aVNoX/+8dc= =Bzhx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Re: libsigc++ install problem
Raj Mathur wrote: Nah, if he's trying to install an RPM the rpm program won't allow him to install due to missing dependencies. Remember, RPM will look for dependencies in the RPM database, not on the filesystem. Good lord, I'm reminding an RHCE! *g,dr* Very funny! :-P The output of RPM will normally tell you the exact library version that the app expects. The contents of /usr/local/lib will confirm to you whether teh same library version is installed - sometimes a simple symlink to the library file is needed to let the app use the correct library. If we could confirm that the library is installed then we can bite the bullet and install teh app with RPM --nodeps - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharyahttp://www.sandipb.net sandip at puroga.com Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. http://www.puroga.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Apache/2.0.40 problem
access_log contains:- ### . . 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:15 +051800] GET /scripts/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:15 +051800] GET /MSADC/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:16 +051800] GET /c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:17 +051800] GET /d/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:17 +051800] GET /scripts/..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:18 +051800] GET /_vti_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:18 +051800] GET /_mem_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:19 +051800] GET /msadc/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c/..%c1%1c../..%c1%1c../..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - 68.56.176.39 - - [03/Nov/2003:14:36:20 +051800] GET /scripts/..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0 404 1041 - - . . .## I think my server is being tried for hacking ? What to do now. Should i forward such request to M$ which we did at one pt of time.:) /yash On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 20:39, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Yashpal Nagar wrote: Dear team, I have one web server with no site hosted on it. I just use it for smokeping latency check. But for the last few days i am seeing in error_log [Sat Nov 01 17:52:00 2003] [error] [client 210.174.164.7] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:52:06 2003] [error] [client 65.138.121.92] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:53:16 2003] [error] [client 12.209.185.230] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:53:25 2003] [error] [client 67.38.12.57] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:55:28 2003] [error] [client 66.233.76.187] Directory index forbidden by rule: /var/www/html/ [Sat Nov 01 17:57:20 2003] [error] [client 219.78.196.35] Directory What are the corresponding entries in access_log? - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharyahttp://www.sandipb.net sandip at puroga.com Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. http://www.puroga.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
