[ilugd] [OT] SOS for Internet connectivity
hi, i need a good internet connection in Noida sector 51 , any ideas clues , vendors, providers,known devils , unknown devils ... my problem with the presently available connection from SIFY is availability, i need somethin which should be highly available, i am not too particular about bandwidth. cheers satyakam __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] [OT] SOS for Internet connectivity
try perfect solutions, 2546859 Mr. Sumit, sector 19 , noida he provides internet on cable and i am using it from last 2 years now. amit - Original Message - From: satyakam goswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:25 PM Subject: [ilugd] [OT] SOS for Internet connectivity hi, i need a good internet connection in Noida sector 51 , any ideas clues , vendors, providers,known devils , unknown devils ... my problem with the presently available connection from SIFY is availability, i need somethin which should be highly available, i am not too particular about bandwidth. cheers satyakam __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] Query reg. LTSP Installation
LTSP is? - Original Message - From: Kunal Singhal (Linux) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Delhi LUG Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 1:49 PM Subject: [ilugd] Query reg. LTSP Installation Hi everyone, For quite a time I have been trying to implement LTSP in my office. I used PCQLinux 2004 which comes with LTSP pre-installed on it. Now I have two queries : 1. I want to do a fresh installation of Linux. So, for LTSP should I use Fedora Core 1 or 2 OR a stable version like Red Hat 8/9. 2. I tried booting 5 different systems in my office using LTSP. 4 of them succesfully booted, but none of them booted to the GUI screen. All gave an error that XFree86 is not able to load the driver. I used auto and the screen type in settings. Out of those 2 have Intel 810 graphics and remaining 2 have SiS 6326 and Cirrus Logic Displays. Kindly provide me some help on the above. Thanks to all who respond. Kunal ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] Query reg. LTSP Installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit Sharma wrote: | LTSP is? LTSP(Linux Terminal Serrver Project) http://www.ltsp.org - -- Regards Ritesh Agrawal -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA/4L6n9bwBzJy218RAjJOAKCip5GCrRf58688z0DBkG39sc1xnwCgpUu4 lr75E5ryVGlX9nstkUCzdNE= =EtIB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
[ilugd] [Fwd: [blug-non-tech] LUG Meets: Are they still relevant]
Very interesting!!! And I thought it was only me wondering. -Tarun -Forwarded Message- From: Kartik N To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [blug-non-tech] LUG Meets: Are they still relevant Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:34:23 +0530 I was just wondering how relevant LUG meets are in today's world. Lesser participation and a seemingly low enthusiasm at BLUG meets points to a lack of interest in these meetings. Here are some reasons that I could think of for the diminishing interest. a) We can find Linux users everywhere. About 5 years ago, a LUG meet was the only place where I could find other Linux users. It was exciting to go the meets and discuss stuff! Things are different now. Almost every college student uses Linux, more offices are beginning to use Linux and one does not need to wait till the end of the month to have a face-to-face meeting with another Linux user. b) Easier Internet access. Almost everyone has easy access to the Internet now, even from home. And the number of sites providing help and information have increased tremendously. If I have a problem, I have to just type my query into Google and, in most cases, I can find an answer immediately. Thoughts and ideas are shared on blogs and other public sites. There are many more reasons, but from what I have seen in the past few years, the above reasons are major players. So, are BLUG meets still relevant? Do we need to change the format/frequency for the meets to make them more interesting and get more involvement? Kartik ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] [OT] SOS for Internet connectivity
--- satyakam goswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i need a good internet connection in Noida sector 51 , any ideas clues , vendors, providers,known devils , unknown devils ... my problem with the presently available connection from SIFY is availability, i need somethin which should be highly available, i am not too particular about bandwidth. cheers satyakam Hi. Try touchtel. They're digging up the roadsides in my sector for putting new landlines for telephones and internet. -Shehjar __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
[ilugd] I/O perf improvement
Hi, I have RH 8 installed on my machine. Tomcat/Apache/MySQL are installed to run few web applications. The machine usually gives OK kind performance. BUT when i take MySQL backups to other machine over NFS (that i have to take every 4 hours), the perf of web apps go down drastically, What i can see if as Backup does lot of I/O, and the apps also do lot of I/O for log processing and all. so this may be the problem. because other times, the apps give faster response. What could be the ways to improve I/O perf. I have IDE and dont and wont ;-) have SCSI drives. any insights if can fine tune something in linux. Navjot Singh ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] [Fwd: [blug-non-tech] LUG Meets: Are they still relevant]
Hey All! Am back after a hiatus of over 2 months ;) Lesser participation and a seemingly low enthusiasm at BLUG I can very confidently state that BLUG meetings (and hopefully ilug-d - i haven't one attended since LinuxAsia..:) are in no shortage of members who want to hang out and talk about linux. I think thats more so with ilug-d because of the informality and 'snakes' which is prevalent (not to mention the original Guitar twanging and SciFi book meets coupled with them). The BLUG meets on the other hand, have [sic] become corporatized [/sic]. It was exciting to go the meets and discuss stuff! Things are different now. Almost every college student uses Linux.. Correction. It IS still exciting to go, meet other people and discuss stuff and debate about issues as varied as which distro, or how barista is too expensive, and satkar's rules ;) Secondly, most college students might use Linux as a compulsion, which is definitely not in the same vein as getting hooked on to something new and exciting. Talking to people who fall in the latter category might rub some enthusiasm off them! ..Internet now, even from home. And the number of sites providing help.. But we come back to the oft discussed topic.. Is the internet (and BBS's before) the end of our social skills as we know them? Searching google (or even IRC) for a technical problem is one thing, but looking for expressions and epressing thoughts on blogs is a totally wierd concept, if seen in mutual exclusion of face to face contact. You NEED to go talk to people, drink, eat with them, and generally talk about stuff. I'm part of the Delhi Blogger's group, and even THEY have group meetings every month. (Do a google on DelhiBloggersMeet). I really don't think the concept of meets is going to fade away for a long time. [Kartik, the original thread creator btw, is the maintainer of the BLUG list. Or was till a while ago..] PS, this was just an off the cuff reaction to the post ;) Ciao! Viksit = -- Viksit Gaur http://www.viksit.com me[at]viksit.com viksit[at]linux-delhi[dot]org 'Not all who wander are lost.' - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] [Fwd: [blug-non-tech] LUG Meets: Are they still relevant]
From: Viksit Gaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ilugd] [Fwd: [blug-non-tech] LUG Meets: Are they still relevant] Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Hey All! Am back after a hiatus of over 2 months ;) Lesser participation and a seemingly low enthusiasm at BLUG I can very confidently state that BLUG meetings (and hopefully ilug-d - i haven't one attended since LinuxAsia..:) are in no shortage of members who want to hang out and talk about linux. I think thats more so with ilug-d because of the informality and 'snakes' which is prevalent (not to mention the original Guitar twanging and SciFi book meets coupled with them). The BLUG meets on the other hand, have [sic] become corporatized [/sic]. It was exciting to go the meets and discuss stuff! Things are different now. Almost every college student uses Linux.. Correction. It IS still exciting to go, meet other people and discuss stuff and debate about issues as varied as which distro, or how barista is too expensive, and satkar's rules ;) Secondly, most college students might use Linux as a compulsion, which is definitely not in the same vein as getting hooked on to something new and exciting. Talking to people who fall in the latter category might rub some enthusiasm off them! ..Internet now, even from home. And the number of sites providing help.. But we come back to the oft discussed topic.. Is the internet (and BBS's before) the end of our social skills as we know them? Searching google (or even IRC) for a technical problem is one thing, but looking for expressions and epressing thoughts on blogs is a totally wierd concept, if seen in mutual exclusion of face to face contact. You NEED to go talk to people, drink, eat with them, and generally talk about stuff. I'm part of the Delhi Blogger's group, and even THEY have group meetings every month. (Do a google on DelhiBloggersMeet). I really don't think the concept of meets is going to fade away for a long time. [Kartik, the original thread creator btw, is the maintainer of the BLUG list. Or was till a while ago..] PS, this was just an off the cuff reaction to the post ;) Ciao! Viksit = -- Viksit Gaur http://www.viksit.com me[at]viksit.com viksit[at]linux-delhi[dot]org 'Not all who wander are lost.' - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ _ Get head-hunted by 10,000 recruiters. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/46246.asp Post your CV on naukri.com today. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] Samba 3.x swat preauthentication buffer overflow
[Please upgrade if you run swat on Samba 3.x. Updated distribution packages should be available soon -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Evgeny Demidov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Samba 3.x swat preauthentication buffer overflow Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:05:55 +0400 Name: Samba 3.x swat preauthentication buffer overflow Date: 22 Jule 2004 CVE candidate: CAN-2004-0600 Author:Evgeny Demidov Description: There exists a remote preauthentication buffer overflow in Samba 3.x swat administration service. All version of Samba 3.0.2-3.0.4 are vulnerable to our knowledge. Fix: Samba 3.0.5 which fixes this problem is available: http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.5.html History: 28 April 2004 - vulnerability has been discovered during Samba source code audit by Evgeny Demidov 29 April 2004 - vulnerability details has been made available to VulnDisco clients 14 Jule 2004 - vulnerability has been reported to Samba Team 22 Jule 2004 - public release of the advisory ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- End of this Digest ** -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
[ilugd] Email Delays
Dear all, Is there a way where i can trace ( other than the mail header ) how the email has travelled from its source o destination ( hops etc.. ) Problem is oly from one domain, we get the email 1.5 hrs later. Source email logs show that it leaves a x time and our email logs show that it hits us at 1.5+ x hrs.. Very mind puzzling.. any clues ?? regards, -- anil bindal [EMAIL PROTECTED] dcm technologies ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] [DSA 532-1] New libapache-mod-ssl packages fix multiple vulnerabilities
[Please upgrade libapache-mod-ssl on all platforms. This is additional to the apache-ssl advisory posted a few weeks earlier -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] [SECURITY] [DSA 532-1] New libapache-mod-ssl packages fix multiple vulnerabilities Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:29:33 -0700 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Debian Security Advisory DSA 532-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimmerman July 22nd, 2004 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - -- Package: libapache-mod-ssl Vulnerability : several Problem-Type : remote Debian-specific: no CVE Ids: CAN-2004-0488 CAN-2004-0700 Two vulnerabilities were discovered in libapache-mod-ssl: CAN-2004-0488 - Stack-based buffer overflow in the ssl_util_uuencode_binary function in ssl_util.c for Apache mod_ssl, when mod_ssl is configured to trust the issuing CA, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a client certificate with a long subject DN. CAN-2004-0700 - Format string vulnerability in the ssl_log function in ssl_engine_log.c in mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary messages via format string specifiers in certain log messages for HTTPS. For the current stable distribution (woody), these problems have been fixed in version 2.8.9-2.3. For the unstable distribution (sid), CAN-2004-0488 was fixed in version 2.8.18, and CAN-2004-0700 will be fixed soon. We recommend that you update your libapache-mod-ssl package. Upgrade Instructions - wget url will fetch the file for you dpkg -i file.deb will install the referenced file. If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for sources.list as given below: apt-get update will update the internal database apt-get upgrade will install corrected packages You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the footer to the proper configuration. Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias woody - Source archives: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3.dsc Size/MD5 checksum: 678 6a21d08bfe122ad4165d7764d34f0acb http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3.diff.gz Size/MD5 checksum:17915 b1769bb313f5b262b0ee377cae527e63 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9.orig.tar.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 752613 aad438a4ea29ae74483f7afe9db0 Architecture independent components: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl-doc_2.8.9-2.3_all.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 303658 3cee43feb0382c94a91f37c869784211 ARM architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_arm.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 240152 8ea7ed4b9a52ad9104c1b7241bfcfa7e Intel IA-32 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_i386.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 238974 ab879ea9c8f4a25fee9f297162a720c7 Intel IA-64 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_ia64.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 268784 4a9593779bf0a88d6508875301aefc0b HP Precision architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_hppa.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 248170 bd367099eaea46b34f35bebfe0623ea3 Motorola 680x0 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_m68k.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 241190 6b535557a851a978ca24c5d99cacaf6e Big endian MIPS architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_mips.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 236148 be9a58f7d4ebd346d6f763b55e27d4d9 Little endian MIPS architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_mipsel.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 236104 46d64b439ff98561b0b0567cda037ca3 PowerPC architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/liba/libapache-mod-ssl/libapache-mod-ssl_2.8.9-2.3_powerpc.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 242008 97ce3ae75e342f817d16fca999a8f3ba IBM S/390 architecture:
