Re: [ilugd] foss.in
Kishore Bhargava wrote: Any ILUGD'ers going to foss.in this year. Have not seen the final list yet but don't remember seeing too many talks from here. I am going. Shehjar ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] foss.in
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 3:44 pm, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: Kishore Bhargava wrote: Any ILUGD'ers going to foss.in this year. Have not seen the final list yet but don't remember seeing too many talks from here. I am going. Me too, along with Kapil and Supreet. -Taj. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] NICs on RHEL 4.0
Hi All, I have a Redhat Enterprise linux 4.0 with two NICs on a DL320, 32 bit arch HP server. Problem is every reboot the interface eth0 flips over to the other physical interface and then i have to physically move the cable to other interface. I get the following on console. Nov 8 12:29:40 servername ifup: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. What i have tried: 1. By specifying the HWADDR keyword in ifcfg-eth0 but no luck. 2. i have also tried putting BOOTPROTO=none and placing the /sbin/ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:0B:CD:4E:31:C1 in /etc/rc.d/rc/local and then restart the network interface as told at http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-April/msg02721.html http://whoozoo.co.uk/mac-spoof-linux.htm but still same problem. The both NIC is NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet. Any pointer/hack would be highly appreciated. Regards Yashpal ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] [Gllug] NICs on RHEL 4.0
Yashpal Nagar wrote: Hi All, I have a Redhat Enterprise linux 4.0 with two NICs on a DL320, 32 bit arch HP server. Problem is every reboot the interface eth0 flips over to the other physical interface and then i have to physically move the cable to other interface. I get the following on console. Nov 8 12:29:40 servername ifup: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. What i have tried: 1. By specifying the HWADDR keyword in ifcfg-eth0 but no luck. 2. i have also tried putting BOOTPROTO=none and placing the /sbin/ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:0B:CD:4E:31:C1 in /etc/rc.d/rc/local and then restart the network interface as told at http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-April/msg02721.html http://whoozoo.co.uk/mac-spoof-linux.htm but still same problem. The both NIC is NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet. Any pointer/hack would be highly appreciated. you can get the redhat support contact details from their website at http://www.redhat.com/ :) -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] [Gllug] NICs on RHEL 4.0
Karanbir Singh wrote: you can get the redhat support contact details from their website at http://www.redhat.com/ :) does that mean, nobody know RHEL? apart from Redhat itself. Or there is any restriction of discussing anything about RHEL in any open forum like this ? Cheers! Yashpal ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] foss.in
On 11/8/06, Kishore Bhargava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ILUGD'ers going to foss.in this year. Have not seen the final list yet but don't remember seeing too many talks from here. Just curious. Cheers...Kishore -- Good chance to see u there. anand ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Special Interest Group on FOSS for Business and Industry
FOSS has made great strides in IT industry and is widely recognised, respected and used by knowledgable IT professionals and organisations. However, non-IT Professionals and non-IT Organisations largely seem to completly miss the bus as far as FOSS is concerned. These segments are still possessed by many a myths on FOSS which have time and again been debunked by the FOSS Community. Most active LUG / FOSS community members are primarily driven by IT as a passion. However, for many of those for whome IT is neither a passion nor a profession continue to be in dark ages as far as FOSS is concerned. Incidently, many of these non-IT people influence decisions in many ways in places where FOSS can play a significant role. A need is felt to have a Special Interest Group within the LUG, which can discuss methods, plan activities and create resources to help reach these non-IT decision makers, so as to enhance the potential for FOSS use in a larger segment of our society and economy. The above follows from the thread of discussions following Sudev Brar's earlier posting [Cut Paste] Vista EULA on the ilugd mailing list. While most certainly the ilugd general mailing list is the breeding ground for many an idea which are helpful for the above cause, but is less meaningful to the audience to which the above Special Interest Group is being targetted. It is for the more technology inclined and for a general believer in doing things by his own hands. The Special Interest Group will be a focussed area of activity with its own specific agenda. I sincerely believe that it will bring positive synergies for the fundamental cause we stand for. Definetly there are a large number of similar groups already in existence, but a new one under the ilugd shall give a fresh impetus in a new direction, bringing practicing people from the industry in the NCR to a common platform. The Business and Industry are faced with many an unique problem which mostly escape the attention of the existing ilugd general mailing list or gets tagged as Commercial. I strongly propose creation of a separate Special Intrerest Group under the ilugd, with an independent mailing list. Comments and suggestions please. Anand Shankar ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] answer seeking by an admin
Sharad Birmiwal wrote: 4) If this disk is configured and partitioned successfully. One has copied /boo, / , /var and /usr of running system to this disk on If you copy / you don't need to copy anything else. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research. The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who cannot - rrs ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] NICs on RHEL 4.0
Blame Kudzu for all this. That's what was/is broken in RHEL4. You haven't mentioned which Update you're using. The latest Update release should have it fixed. Ritesh Yashpal Nagar wrote: Hi All, I have a Redhat Enterprise linux 4.0 with two NICs on a DL320, 32 bit arch HP server. Problem is every reboot the interface eth0 flips over to the other physical interface and then i have to physically move the cable to other interface. I get the following on console. Nov 8 12:29:40 servername ifup: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. What i have tried: 1. By specifying the HWADDR keyword in ifcfg-eth0 but no luck. 2. i have also tried putting BOOTPROTO=none and placing the /sbin/ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:0B:CD:4E:31:C1 in /etc/rc.d/rc/local and then restart the network interface as told at http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-April/msg02721.html http://whoozoo.co.uk/mac-spoof-linux.htm but still same problem. The both NIC is NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet. Any pointer/hack would be highly appreciated. Regards Yashpal -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research. The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who cannot - rrs ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] [Gllug] NICs on RHEL 4.0
On 08-Nov-06, at 9:29 PM, Yashpal Nagar wrote: you can get the redhat support contact details from their website at http://www.redhat.com/ :) does that mean, nobody know RHEL? apart from Redhat itself. Or there is any restriction of discussing anything about RHEL in any open forum like this ? it means that since you have paid Redhat, you should extract support from them - if they are unable/refuse to give support, then report here and we will put them in the hall of shame. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Special Interest Group on FOSS for Business and Industry
On 08/11/06, Anand Shankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, non-IT Professionals and non-IT Organisations largely seem to completly miss the bus as far as FOSS is concerned. These segments are still possessed by many a myths on FOSS which have time and again been debunked by the FOSS Community. [SNIP] general mailing list or gets tagged as Commercial. I strongly propose creation of a separate Special Intrerest Group under the ilugd, with an independent mailing list. Comments and suggestions please. Count me in. Let those on this list interested raise their (virtual) hands. Maybe if there is sufficient interest we convene a ILUGD-SIG meet to discuss ways forward. [SEMANTICS NOTE] The above follows from the thread of discussions following Sudev Brar's earlier posting [Cut Paste] Vista EULA on the ilugd mailing Sudev Barar and not Sudev Brar -- Regards, Sudev Barar ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Indian language character conversion
On 3:38:18 am 11/08/06 Nagarjuna Venna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] 3. I see problems with the six categories defined in the doc: a. It is not clear to me where a syllable like 'shri' falls. [...] I mis-spoke regarding this, which might be an important point for any future discussion. According to the logic that I am using here, शà¥à¤°à¥ would be a conjunct (श + र), plus a matra (vowel sign ii, à¥), Sorry for the confusion. Not enough sleep on my part. Regards, Gora ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Our IP getting listed in cbl again and again
Hi all, We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP is getting listed on cbl again and again. We have verified the checklist given by cbl and observed that we are fulfilling all the conditions specified by them but still we are getting listed. The security considerations we have setup are pop3/imap for local users pop3/imap ssl for remote users smtp securefor remote users Any hints/pointers at what could be wrong are highly appreciated. Regards, Sangeeta ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Our IP getting listed in cbl again and again
On 09-Nov-06, at 10:29 AM, Sangeeta Joneja wrote: We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP which ISP? static IP or dynamic IP? -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Our IP getting listed in cbl again and again
On 11/9/06, Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09-Nov-06, at 10:29 AM, Sangeeta Joneja wrote: We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP which ISP? static IP or dynamic IP? It's static IP. Regards, Sangeeta ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
