Re: [ilugd] I am unable to understand this C code
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:29 PM, rakesh kumar kumar3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Today while studying a book i just saw the following lines of code:
int main(void)
{
int printf(const char *n,...);
The local declaration(prototype of the function)
int a=1;
printf(abcdef);
Calls the C library printf() function.at the time of linking.
return 0;
}c
and the output was: abcdef
When i tried to run this code, it ran well without any error and this was
asked in GATE exam also. I am confused, how it ran without stdio.h, when i
used printf() function and gave the same output as printf gives. Okay after
that i commented the third line int printf(const char *n,);, the
output didn't get affected. Now i am thinking when we can use printf()
function without any prototype or defining any header, then why do we need
to use #include in our program, because when i changed this program a bit
by substituting printf() with scanf() it worked fine like scanf() does
normally.
Can anyone explain me,what is this?
The C compiler is a bit lenient in syntactic analysis part for
functions. It assumes a default declaration. And while linking links
your printf() call to the library fucntion.But it should give
warning(saying some implicit declaration).
just try compiling with -Wall option set, you will get the warning.
Also compile the code using g++, it will give error, saying prototype not found.
Thanks
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] I am unable to understand this C code
I have tried compling it with g++ and also with g++ -Wall , but it gives no
error warning message. It runs smoothly
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Prashant Batra prashant0...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:29 PM, rakesh kumar kumar3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Today while studying a book i just saw the following lines of
code:
int main(void)
{
int printf(const char *n,...);
The local declaration(prototype of the function)
int a=1;
printf(abcdef);
Calls the C library printf() function.at the time of linking.
return 0;
}c
and the output was: abcdef
When i tried to run this code, it ran well without any error and this was
asked in GATE exam also. I am confused, how it ran without stdio.h,
when i
used printf() function and gave the same output as printf gives. Okay
after
that i commented the third line int printf(const char *n,);, the
output didn't get affected. Now i am thinking when we can use printf()
function without any prototype or defining any header, then why do we
need
to use #include in our program, because when i changed this program a
bit
by substituting printf() with scanf() it worked fine like scanf() does
normally.
Can anyone explain me,what is this?
The C compiler is a bit lenient in syntactic analysis part for
functions. It assumes a default declaration. And while linking links
your printf() call to the library fucntion.But it should give
warning(saying some implicit declaration).
just try compiling with -Wall option set, you will get the warning.
Also compile the code using g++, it will give error, saying prototype not
found.
Thanks
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] What happened in today's meeting
Hi, Sorry i couldn't get there today but curiously waiting what happened in today's meeting. Have the date for freed.in been decided today? ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Problem on installing GnuPG-Interface perl 5.8.8 module.
Dear All, I was trying to install RT-3.8.7 on CentOs 5.4 and stuck in dependence of GnuPG-Interface-0.42.tar.gz. It is failing on testing.I have searched on google but unable to fine help. I am enclosing output for help pls Executing make test .. PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', ' blib/arch') t/*.t t/clearsignsyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/clearsign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/clearsign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/decrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/decrypt.t line 12. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/decrypt.t line 12. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-4 Failed 4/4 tests, 0.00% okay t/detach_sign..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/detach_sign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/detach_sign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt_symmetricallysyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/export_keys..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/export_keys.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/export_keys.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/Fingerprint..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Fingerpr int.pm line 18, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) Compilation failed in require at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/get_public_keys..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in
Re: [ilugd] ILUGD meeting: 2.30pm, Sun., 7th Feb., 2010, SIT, JNU
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Gaurav Mishra gauravtec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Long time since we have had a meeting. So, we will be having one this coming Sunday at the School of Information Technology, JNU. Time and place are tentative and feel free to debate on it if required. There is one main agenda item as of now (Please feel free to add any more agenda items and we can drool over it at the meeting): (a) Planning for Freed.in 2010. Event:ILUG-Delhi meeting Date: Sun., Feb. 7th, 2010 Time: 2.30pm Agenda: o Freed.in planning meeting o Misc: Minutes of the meeting (MOM) : (a)Possible ideas for the freed.in 1.Get more developers 2.Showcase more projects 3.FOSS with colleges and students 4.Initiating new FOSS projects 5.Make FOSS available 6.Develop the foss ecosystem and go beyond simple software. 7.Networking 9.Open ends 8.Make foss open for others. (b)Possible Audience: 1.Developers 2.Students 3.Foss evangelists 4.Entrepreneurs 5.Techies/Geeks (c)Possible Targets: 1.Mobiles 2.Web 3.Open Source Media (Wiki and open contents) (d)Event Duration - 2 Days (e)Event Date : Not yet decided Ps: I shared very rough notes, feel free to reply if i lost any points. - Honey Singh www.twitter.com/honeytech ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUGD meeting: 2.30pm, Sun., 7th Feb., 2010, SIT, JNU
dear all, Minutes of the meeting (MOM) : thanks honey for the MOM, my POP is that the overall feelgood factor for freed.in is high, the team is refreshed and motivated, and everybody seems to have a better sense of what works, what would not work, and how to delegate tasks, and to coordinate the event. Okay, so POP = my Personal Opinion and Perspective. meanwhile, kishore is happy to see others willing to take on the main tasks, and is glad to offer his experience and full support where needed to help the team drive the event. (a)Possible ideas for the freed.in [snip] we also discussed content-contributors, such as wiki people, creative content authors, et al. [snip] (c)Possible Targets: [snip] the meeting ended with the question should we also have a track for sysadmins, networkAdmins, cloud-computing, etc. one suggestion was to have the theme but have the actual track and sessions for this for a day. (d)Event Duration - 2 Days (e)Event Date : Not yet decided. towards sep-end, somewhere in oct, or perhaps spilling into the first dates of nov. gaurav and others to fill in all the details, list of participants to this meeting; discussion-point details; misc; and then to announce the date for the next meet, which should probably be the coming sunday. eh? regards niyam ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUGD meeting: 2.30pm, Sun., 7th Feb., 2010, SIT, JNU
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Linux Lingam linuxlin...@gmail.com wrote: dear all, Minutes of the meeting (MOM) : thanks honey for the MOM, my POP is that the overall feelgood factor for freed.in is high, the team is refreshed and motivated, and everybody seems to have a better sense of what works, what would not work, and how to delegate tasks, and to coordinate the event. Okay, so POP = my Personal Opinion and Perspective. meanwhile, kishore is happy to see others willing to take on the main tasks, and is glad to offer his experience and full support where needed to help the team drive the event. (a)Possible ideas for the freed.in [snip] we also discussed content-contributors, such as wiki people, creative content authors, et al. [snip] (c)Possible Targets: [snip] the meeting ended with the question should we also have a track for sysadmins, networkAdmins, cloud-computing, etc. one suggestion was to have the theme but have the actual track and sessions for this for a day. (d)Event Duration - 2 Days (e)Event Date : Not yet decided. towards sep-end, somewhere in oct, or perhaps spilling into the first dates of nov. hey I might be wrong..but I think CWG may affect. 3rd-14th October. gaurav and others to fill in all the details, list of participants to this meeting; discussion-point details; misc; and then to announce the date for the next meet, which should probably be the coming sunday. eh? regards niyam ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd -- Dhiraj Pandey # Web: http://www.mediaredefined.com # Blog: http://www.dhirajpandey.com # Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dhirajpandey # LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhirajpandey # Phone: +91.9312047648 ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUGD meeting: 2.30pm, Sun., 7th Feb., 2010, SIT, JNU
on Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya sand...@foss-community.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Yashpal Nagar yashna...@gmail.com wrote: I still remeber the chilly momos of Vasant Vihar... after a great session of Open Source/ Linux. Such meeting are a valuable platform to anyone wheather he is begineer, intermediate or proficient in the Linux/OSS technologies and its awareness. ... and the post-meeting rolls at Saket market is one of my best memories about ILUGD meet. :) recession!!! and budget cuts we settled down for Samosas and Tea at the University canteen ;-) -Satya ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Unable to set virtual environment
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:31 PM, narendra sisodiya narendra.sisod...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to run qemu but I think it is very slow Or not working, $ qemu -cdrom Ubuntu_9.10_i386.iso -hda qemu_disk.img -m 256 -boot d open /dev/kvm: No such file or directory Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support You can check - your hardware has virtualization support or not via : egrep '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo May anybody tell me about the error. After booting , ubuntu logo comes followed by a blank screen, but it do not show any desktop. I am unable to boot any of iso images. Does this issue related to hardware ? here is the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo http://www.textbin.com/show_text.php?id=2434o I have also tried using all sort of GUI, like vboxgtk, qemu-launcer but nothing worked out. Do anybody have clue what is wrong with my machine. -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya ( नरेन्द्र सिसोदिया ) │Society for Knowledge Commons │Web : http://narendra.techfandu.org └─┘ ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Regards, Ashu ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUGD meeting: 2.30pm, Sun., 7th Feb., 2010, SIT, JNU
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Linux Lingam linuxlin...@gmail.com wrote: dear all, Minutes of the meeting (MOM) : thanks honey for the MOM, my POP is that the overall feelgood factor for freed.in is high, the team is refreshed and motivated, and everybody seems to have a better sense of what works, what would not work, and how to delegate tasks, and to coordinate the event. starting with a clean slate was a good start . Rajesh tried to break the ice but , i think still he was trying to find meaning what the heck is this community which folks around talk about ;-) Okay, so POP = my Personal Opinion and Perspective. meanwhile, kishore is happy to see others willing to take on the main tasks, and is glad to offer his experience and full support where needed to help the team drive the event. Good for the event hopefully it will bring new zeal. (a)Possible ideas for the freed.in [snip] we also discussed content-contributors, such as wiki people, creative content authors, et al. [snip] (c)Possible Targets: [snip] the meeting ended with the question should we also have a track for sysadmins, networkAdmins, cloud-computing, etc. one suggestion was to have the theme but have the actual track and sessions for this for a day. i think in some way the event speaks of the charater the people who are going run the show , like to me as of now looks more of Bloggers meet / Drupal camp but again it is too early to take a call let it take shape , lets now worry about what's its gonna be. @Gaurav proposed an idea of making it a meeting point of communities to meet, i would say its a noble goal but needs some reflections on constrains and how to manage them. Overall i would start without any expectations and not to try hold on to some unrealistic goals so let it go as you get inputs you will have a great event. -Satya satyaakam.net ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Problem on installing GnuPG-Interface perl 5.8.8 module.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Ajay Kumar joinaj...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I was trying to install RT-3.8.7 on CentOs 5.4 and stuck in dependence of GnuPG-Interface-0.42.tar.gz. It is failing on testing.I have searched on google but unable to fine help. I am enclosing output for help pls Have you tried to install lower version of GnuPG::Interface? Executing make test .. PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', ' blib/arch') t/*.t t/clearsignsyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/clearsign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/clearsign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/decrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/decrypt.t line 12. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/decrypt.t line 12. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-4 Failed 4/4 tests, 0.00% okay t/detach_sign..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/detach_sign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/detach_sign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt_symmetricallysyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/export_keys..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/export_keys.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/export_keys.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/Fingerprint..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Fingerpr int.pm line 18, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) Compilation failed in require at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/get_public_keys..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted
Re: [ilugd] Problem on installing GnuPG-Interface perl 5.8.8 module.
Thanks for response.Yes,I tried lower version .41,.40 and .36 but same issue. On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Linuz Ashu linuza...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Ajay Kumar joinaj...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I was trying to install RT-3.8.7 on CentOs 5.4 and stuck in dependence of GnuPG-Interface-0.42.tar.gz. It is failing on testing.I have searched on google but unable to fine help. I am enclosing output for help pls Have you tried to install lower version of GnuPG::Interface? Executing make test .. PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', ' blib/arch') t/*.t t/clearsignsyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/clearsign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/clearsign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/decrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/decrypt.t line 12. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/decrypt.t line 12. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-4 Failed 4/4 tests, 0.00% okay t/detach_sign..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/detach_sign.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/detach_sign.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay t/encrypt_symmetricallysyntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/encrypt_symmetrically.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/export_keys..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Interfac e.pm line 16, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG /Interface.pm line 18. Compilation failed in require at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/MyTestSpecific.pm line 26. Compilation failed in require at t/export_keys.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/export_keys.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/Fingerprint..syntax error at /tmp/.webmin/GnuPG-Interface-0.42/blib/lib/GnuPG/Fingerpr int.pm line 18, near with qw(GnuPG::HashInit) Compilation failed in require at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/Fingerprint.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay t/get_public_keys..syntax error at
Re: [ilugd] Minutes of Meeting
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Honey Singh honeyt...@gmail.com wrote: Minutes of the meeting (MOM) : We had a great meeting and total 14 people attended the meet, Out of which 13 ended in the Famous JNU canteen for some delicious samosa and chai :) (a)Possible ideas for the freed.in 1.Get more developers 2.Showcase more projects 3.FOSS with colleges and students 4.Initiating new FOSS projects 5.Make FOSS available 6.Develop the foss ecosystem and go beyond simple software. 7.Networking 9.Open ends 8.Make foss open for others. Also, The basic theme of freed.in is Free and Open source ecosystem which will comprises of not only the Software gurus and geeks, but the overall ecosystem of creative commons contributors and open source software users. (b)Possible Audience: 1.Developers 2.Students 3.Foss evangelists 4.Entrepreneurs 5.Techies/Geeks 6. Creative common contributors This is a very exhaustive list and is very open for discussion , feel free to comment on it. (c)Possible Targets: 1.Mobiles 2.Web 3.Open Source Media (Wiki and open contents) These are basic themes that we decided to target, We had a great discussion over System Admin track but decided to let go the theme due to lack of interest seen in the FOSS community over System admin. (d)Event Duration - 2 Days (e)Event Date : Not yet decided We need suggestions on Venue Date ? and Venue location !, JNU is always on cards but we are very open to find new avenues. Suggesions and Comments ? Regards, Gaurav Mishra Co-founder - Media Redefined - A social media branding consulting studio. # Web: http://www.mediaredefined.com # Blog: http://www.gmishra.com # Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmishra # LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/gauravmishra7 # Phone: +91.9911264089 ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
