Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
Thanks every one for suggestions. I found one more resource which is more in tune with what I was looking for: https://blog.apnic.net/2023/04/04/ipv6-architecture-and-subnetting-guide-for-network-engineers-and-operators/ X. Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. --- Original Message --- On Monday, July 31st, 2023 at 9:31 PM, Fearghas Mckay wrote: > On 31 Jul 2023 at 11:19:29, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> See if you can find a friendly local person in your local Network Operators >> Group (NOG) to help you a bit. NOGs are a great place for those looking to >> learn. And otherwise feel free to contact me off-list. I’ll happily get you >> started. > > UKNOF and NetLDN would be good places to start. > > https://uknof.uk/ > > https://netldn.uk/ > > f-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
On 31 Jul 2023 at 11:19:29, Sander Steffann wrote: > See if you can find a friendly local person in your local Network > Operators Group (NOG) to help you a bit. NOGs are a great place for those > looking to learn. And otherwise feel free to contact me off-list. I’ll > happily get you started. > UKNOF and NetLDN would be good places to start. https://uknof.uk/ https://netldn.uk/ f -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
Hi, > We are not using IGP as of now, its a small NOC with a couple of devices. I would strongly suggest using an IGP (probably OSPF) even in a small setup. It will allow you much greater flexibility and redundancy with very little effort. See if you can find a friendly local person in your local Network Operators Group (NOG) to help you a bit. NOGs are a great place for those looking to learn. And otherwise feel free to contact me off-list. I’ll happily get you started. Cheers! Sander -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
Thanks for your input Michael. The vagueness of the problem description reflects my own confusion. We are not using IGP as of now, its a small NOC with a couple of devices. --- Original Message --- On Monday, July 31st, 2023 at 12:38 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > Each router needs a /128 as a loopback address to use. > I assign them all from a single /64 for that purpose. Ok. > Many of your p2p ethernet links between sites/routers might not > need prefixes at all. This is not clear. > > 2. How will we be assigning static address to (DNS?) > > servers? > > > I don't understand the question. My question was that I have a /35 (say 2001:db8:2000::/35), and a router with three interfaces, one a p2p link with upstream, rest two interfaces are connected to two different segments as shown below: │ ┌─┴───┐ │ │ │ Router│ │ │ └┬───┬┘ A│ │ B ┌─┘ └───┐ │ │ ┌─┴───┐ ┌───┴──┐ │ CD │ E │ F│ ┌───┴┐ ┌──┴──┐ ┌──┴─┐ ┌──┴─┐ │ dns1 │ │ mail1 │ │ S1│ │S2 │ └┘ └─┘ └┘ └┘ In the diagram above what will be the ip address at points A to F? C-F are servers and need static ip address. > Otherwise a static allocation > from the /64 that the routers provide. Can you please elaborate this? Thanks for your patience and time. I hope the questions I am having will be shared by many and will be addressed in the guidelines when published! X. -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
